Re: Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:41:00AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > [...] > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > >nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 > >gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild > >with fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746' dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 > >galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 > >xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= 1.9.1.6-2)' > [...] > >It seems the nmus haven't triggered on the architectures where > >xulrunner-dev >= 1.9.1.6-2 is available. Could you check what is > >happening ? > > Which package / architecture combinations haven't been tried that > you think should have been? > > The archive is still at xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1 for alpha, armel, mips, > powerpc and sparc. So far as I can see, all other architectures have > built all of the binNMUs, with a couple of exceptions for e.g. > gluezilla being not-for-us on mipsel. M I was basing my mail on https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=galeon and likewise for others packages, which only show the logs for the non binNMUs version for the ones that are currently not dep-wait. Turns out the buildd site is wrong, since http://packages.debian.org/sid/galeon lists the binNMU versions. Sorry for the noise. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100218121808.ga13...@glandium.org
Re: Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
Mike Hommey writes: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 07:39:45PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:04 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:57:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: >> > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: >> > > > nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 >> > > > gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with >> > > > fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746' >> > > > dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 >> > > > gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner >> > > > (>= 1.9.1.6-2)' >> > > I'm wondering... is the >= syntax properly handled ? 1.9.1.6-2 has been >> > > available on (some) architectures for a few days, but none of the >> > > packages above have apparently been attempted to be built. >> > Cyril Brulebois enlighted me with the obvious: the dep-wait should be on >> > xulrunner-dev (>= 1.9.1.6-2), not xulrunner. >> dep-waits fixed. > It seems the nmus haven't triggered on the architectures where > xulrunner-dev >= 1.9.1.6-2 is available. Could you check what is > happening ? I don't see this. The binNMUs haven't triggered for alpha, armel, mips, powerpc and sparc, which all have no newer version of xulrunner in the archive: https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=xulrunner%2Cgluezilla%2Cgaleon%2Cchmsee%2Cgnome-python-extras%2Cxiphos&maint=&dist=unstable Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 18: Vorbereitet für den Multimediaeinsatz Es sind noch zwei Slots auf dem Motherboard frei. (Peter Berlich) pgpUEwyyT6a4H.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
Mike Hommey wrote: [...] On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746' dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= 1.9.1.6-2)' [...] It seems the nmus haven't triggered on the architectures where xulrunner-dev >= 1.9.1.6-2 is available. Could you check what is happening ? Which package / architecture combinations haven't been tried that you think should have been? The archive is still at xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1 for alpha, armel, mips, powerpc and sparc. So far as I can see, all other architectures have built all of the binNMUs, with a couple of exceptions for e.g. gluezilla being not-for-us on mipsel. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/29561960fa6e4195ad289d8c9105b...@internal.avcosystems.com
Re: Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 07:39:45PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:04 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:57:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 > > > > gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with > > > > fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746' > > > > dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 > > > > gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= > > > > 1.9.1.6-2)' > > > > > > I'm wondering... is the >= syntax properly handled ? 1.9.1.6-2 has been > > > available on (some) architectures for a few days, but none of the > > > packages above have apparently been attempted to be built. > > > > Cyril Brulebois enlighted me with the obvious: the dep-wait should be on > > xulrunner-dev (>= 1.9.1.6-2), not xulrunner. > > dep-waits fixed. It seems the nmus haven't triggered on the architectures where xulrunner-dev >= 1.9.1.6-2 is available. Could you check what is happening ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100218104312.ga28...@glandium.org
Re: Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:04 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:57:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 > > > gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with > > > fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746' > > > dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 > > > gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= > > > 1.9.1.6-2)' > > > > I'm wondering... is the >= syntax properly handled ? 1.9.1.6-2 has been > > available on (some) architectures for a few days, but none of the > > packages above have apparently been attempted to be built. > > Cyril Brulebois enlighted me with the obvious: the dep-wait should be on > xulrunner-dev (>= 1.9.1.6-2), not xulrunner. dep-waits fixed. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:57:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The dh_xulrunner script provided by xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1 was broken and > > led to packages using it lacking a dependency on xulrunner-1.9.1. > > > > The script was fixed in 1.9.1.6-2 and to ensure it will continue to work > > in the future, I added a test during the xulrunner build. > > > > I've checked all the build-rdeps using dh_xulrunner and only 5 are > > apparently affected. So, please schedule the following binNMUs: > > > > nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 > > gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with > > fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746' > > dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 > > gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= > > 1.9.1.6-2)' > > I'm wondering... is the >= syntax properly handled ? 1.9.1.6-2 has been > available on (some) architectures for a few days, but none of the > packages above have apparently been attempted to be built. Cyril Brulebois enlighted me with the obvious: the dep-wait should be on xulrunner-dev (>= 1.9.1.6-2), not xulrunner. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > Hi, > > The dh_xulrunner script provided by xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1 was broken and > led to packages using it lacking a dependency on xulrunner-1.9.1. > > The script was fixed in 1.9.1.6-2 and to ensure it will continue to work > in the future, I added a test during the xulrunner build. > > I've checked all the build-rdeps using dh_xulrunner and only 5 are > apparently affected. So, please schedule the following binNMUs: > > nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 > gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with fixed > dh_xulrunner, see #567746' > dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 > gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= > 1.9.1.6-2)' I'm wondering... is the >= syntax properly handled ? 1.9.1.6-2 has been available on (some) architectures for a few days, but none of the packages above have apparently been attempted to be built. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
Mike Hommey writes: > I've checked all the build-rdeps using dh_xulrunner and only 5 are > apparently affected. So, please schedule the following binNMUs: Done. Marc -- BOFH #424: operation failed because: there is no message for this error (#1014) pgpPFeWnB93ia.pgp Description: PGP signature
Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
Hi, The dh_xulrunner script provided by xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1 was broken and led to packages using it lacking a dependency on xulrunner-1.9.1. The script was fixed in 1.9.1.6-2 and to ensure it will continue to work in the future, I added a test during the xulrunner build. I've checked all the build-rdeps using dh_xulrunner and only 5 are apparently affected. So, please schedule the following binNMUs: nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746' dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= 1.9.1.6-2)' Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
