Re: Please consider loop-aes-utils 2.12p-4 for sarge

2005-05-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Max,

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:54:34AM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:

 I just noticed that util-linux 2.12p-4 is now in testing - somewhat
 unexpectedly for me, since the last discussion on -release seemed to
 conclude that updating it was out of question.

 loop-aes-utils 2.12p-4 has been held out of testing as it depends
 on versions of mount (=2.12p-1) that use libblkid, which I added in
 order to keep both packages synced for sarge.

 The difference now in upstream versions between util-linux and
 loop-aes-utils is suboptimal for a number of reasons:

 - Bugs fixed in mount between 2.12a and 2.12p resurface if users
   install loop-aes-utils 2.12a-3

 - Security updates are probably complicated by having two different
   upstream versions of setuid /bin/mount.

 - Translations from util-linux-locales 2.12p may not apply to the
   code from 2.12a.

 loop-aes-utils 2.12p-4 is the same as the mount parts of util-linux 
 2.12p-4, modulo the loop-AES patch. It should be identical to it in
 terms of non-crypto bugs and features. 

 The current version has been in unstable for 47 days with no bugs
 reported against it, and for above reasons, I would like to ask you
 to make a freeze exception for this package.

Yes, given that this was only blocked by util-linux before, I'm going to go
ahead and push it in.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Please consider loop-aes-utils 2.12p-4 for sarge

2005-05-09 Thread Max Vozeler
Hi release team,

I just noticed that util-linux 2.12p-4 is now in testing - somewhat
unexpectedly for me, since the last discussion on -release seemed to
conclude that updating it was out of question.

loop-aes-utils 2.12p-4 has been held out of testing as it depends
on versions of mount (=2.12p-1) that use libblkid, which I added in
order to keep both packages synced for sarge.

The difference now in upstream versions between util-linux and
loop-aes-utils is suboptimal for a number of reasons:

- Bugs fixed in mount between 2.12a and 2.12p resurface if users
  install loop-aes-utils 2.12a-3

- Security updates are probably complicated by having two different
  upstream versions of setuid /bin/mount.

- Translations from util-linux-locales 2.12p may not apply to the
  code from 2.12a.

loop-aes-utils 2.12p-4 is the same as the mount parts of util-linux 
2.12p-4, modulo the loop-AES patch. It should be identical to it in
terms of non-crypto bugs and features. 

The current version has been in unstable for 47 days with no bugs
reported against it, and for above reasons, I would like to ask you
to make a freeze exception for this package.

thanks,
Max


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature