Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On 13951 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th >> > for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work >> > for people? >> Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later? > I was assuming either 8ish UTC (skipping dinstall) or 10ish UTC (after > dinstall). Either would work for me, I'll just need more coffee for the > former. :-) I've put 12 to 14 (so 10 to 12 UTC) in my calendar. -- bye, Joerg I think Smithers picked me because of my motivational skills. Everyone says they have to work a lot harder when I'm around. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87egm4n7zl@gkar.ganneff.de
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 09:56 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to > >> > start planning for the first point release. > >> > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 > >> > really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for > >> > which pu > opu > stable. > > Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th > > for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work > > for people? > > Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later? I was assuming either 8ish UTC (skipping dinstall) or 10ish UTC (after dinstall). Either would work for me, I'll just need more coffee for the former. :-) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1432482871.1640.21.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 16:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > press@ - ping? :-) ... > > Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th > > for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work > > for people? I can be available as a backup for Neil if needed. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
press@ - ping? :-) On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 21:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > [Added some missed CCs; sigh] > > > > On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to > > > start planning for the first point release. > > > > > > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 > > > really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for > > > which pu > opu > stable. > > Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th > for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work > for people? > > Regards, > > Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1432394876.30889.24.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to >> > start planning for the first point release. >> > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 >> > really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for >> > which pu > opu > stable. > Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th > for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work > for people? Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later? -- bye, Joerg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87vbfmz7lk@delenn.ganneff.de
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:22:44PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> [Added some missed CCs; sigh] >> >> On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to >> > start planning for the first point release. >> > >> > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 >> > really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for >> > which pu > opu > stable. > >Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th >for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work >for people? Works for me, yes. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "This dress doesn't reverse." -- Alden Spiess -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150521082137.gw4...@einval.com
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
Adam D. Barratt (2015-05-20): > Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th > for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work > for people? Provided the p-u freeze happens on time so that I can perform d-i tests ahead of the release, that's fine with me; thanks. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [Added some missed CCs; sigh] > > On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to > > start planning for the first point release. > > > > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 > > really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for > > which pu > opu > stable. Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1432153364.3938.14.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:16:23PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >Hi, > >As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to >start planning for the first point release. > >We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 >really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which >pu > opu > stable. > >Suggested dates (all of which appear to be okay for me currently): > >May 23/24 Not good for me - already have big plans that weekend. >May 30/31 >June 6/7 >June 13/14 All OK. >June 20/21 Definitely not for me - on VAC abroad that weekend. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150502000235.gu21...@einval.com
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On 13927 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 > really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which > pu > opu > stable. > May 23/24 Works > May 30/31 Works > June 6/7 Works. > June 13/14 Nope. > June 20/21 Should work. -- bye, Joerg (23:02) I should take a photograph of my stapler, the maker of which is "RAPESCO" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87sibgarz6@gkar.ganneff.de
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
Hi On 2015-05-01, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [...] > - I see gnutls28, linux, and wpa in pu; some testing couldn't hurt. wpa should be safe (famous last words), as it contains only the one-line security fix for CVE-2015-1863[1], which applies to a code path/ file not used by the udeb (as CONFIG_P2P is disabled there); the same goes for wheezy (where CONFIG_P2P is disabled alltogether). I've been testing all three versions (sid, jessie-security and wheezy-security) successfully in a non-udeb context - d-i is different of course and needs special testing, please let me know if there are any issues with the uploads. Regards Stefan Lippers-Hollmann [1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-3233-1 http://w1.fi/security/2015-1/ pgpB_dLl4V8ca.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
[Added some missed CCs; sigh] On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which pu > opu > stable. Suggested dates (all of which appear to be okay for me currently): May 23/24 May 30/31 June 6/7 June 13/14 June 20/21 Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/0a70a4f9f4ea661be0e082441c776...@mowgli.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:08:59PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > May 23/24 > > Offline-ish on May 23. > Same for me. > > May 30/31 > > OK. > OK > > June 6/7 > > Offline on June 6, offline-ish on June 7. > OK > > June 13/14 > > Offline-ish on June 13. > OK > > June 20/21 > > OK. > Offline-ish both these days. Neil -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
(cc+=boot) Adam D. Barratt (2015-04-30): > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to > start planning for the first point release. AFAICT there haven't been too many reports of d-i being badly broken, so there's not much to be fixed. Here's a quick brain dump for jessie: - win32-loader is in the pu pipes already. - we might want to have hw-detect as well because acpi and friends, even if there's some discussion still taking place in #783247 after an upload to unstable. - it'd be nice to have a tasksel fix to allow gnome && xfce to be coinstalled (foo → foo | bar in depends for a single package), even though the fix isn't in unstable yet. - I see gnutls28, linux, and wpa in pu; some testing couldn't hurt. What am I forgetting about? (I had noted down to maybe look into #781439 and #744865 but that hasn't happened yet.) > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; > 7.9 really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for > which pu > opu > stable. Besides the debootstrap pu for wheezy (already in the pipes), I don't think I've got anything planned for wheezy. > Suggested dates (all of which appear to be okay for me currently): Keeping in mind testing d-i against stuff that's in pu (notably linux) should probably happen ahead of the release dates, let's see how much I'm available for the said dates… > May 23/24 Offline-ish on May 23. > May 30/31 OK. > June 6/7 Offline on June 6, offline-ish on June 7. > June 13/14 Offline-ish on June 13. > June 20/21 OK. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
