Re: Bug#554003: munin cpu plugin has too strict limits (#554003)
Hi Adam, On Dienstag, 24. November 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Would you accept a fixed package with just this fix in stable? Yes, the patch looks fine. Thanks. Uploaded to stable-proposed-updates. Should I reassign/clone 554003 to release.debian.org now? regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bug#554003: munin cpu plugin has too strict limits (#554003)
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:11 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Dienstag, 24. November 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Would you accept a fixed package with just this fix in stable?
Yes, the patch looks fine.
Thanks. Uploaded to stable-proposed-updates. Should I reassign/clone 554003
to
release.debian.org now?
There's not really any need now that the package is in p-u-new; {o-,}p-u
bugs are more useful for making sure that we don't forget about updates
that are waiting for us to decide whether to approve them.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#554003: munin cpu plugin has too strict limits (#554003)
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 18:22 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: On Montag, 16. November 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote: http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/munin/1.2.6-17/610-plugin -cpu-fix-max.patch This patch is in sid+squeeze since some time (munin 1.2.6-14 from Aug 26 2009) without any negative feedback, fixing a severity normal bug, which many users, including our beloved DSA team, would like to see fixed in stable. Would you accept a fixed package with just this fix in stable? Yes, the patch looks fine. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#554003: munin cpu plugin has too strict limits (#554003)
Hi stable-release-team, On Montag, 16. November 2009, Peter Palfrader wrote: http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/munin/1.2.6-17/610-plugin -cpu-fix-max.patch This patch is in sid+squeeze since some time (munin 1.2.6-14 from Aug 26 2009) without any negative feedback, fixing a severity normal bug, which many users, including our beloved DSA team, would like to see fixed in stable. Would you accept a fixed package with just this fix in stable? regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bug#554003: munin cpu plugin has too strict limits (#554003)
Hi Peter, Peter Palfrader wrote: I have not heard anything from you munin folks about a possible fix of this bug in stable. Comments? The reason you didn't hear from us is because I've forwarded this bug upstream [1] as this is not a debian specific issue, and as such, it will interest upstream developers (and other distributions). So we should probably continue this discussion in the upstream bug. However, I've seen that so far upstream developers haven't responded to this bug. Maybe some more details on when exactly this is happening might (how to reproduce exactly) might help. Another thing that I notice, is that according to this bug, you're running munin version 1.2.5-1 which is the one released for etch. The cpu plugin was enhanced in munin version 1.2.6, which is packaged for lenny. Can you install the latest munin version from lenny (or testing) and see if the problem persists? Regards, Tom Feiner [1] http://munin.projects.linpro.no/ticket/736 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#554003: munin cpu plugin has too strict limits (#554003)
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Tom Feiner wrote: So we should probably continue this discussion in the upstream bug. Or we could just fix it. However, I've seen that so far upstream developers haven't responded to this bug. Maybe some more details on when exactly this is happening might (how to reproduce exactly) might help. I have lined out whent it happens. And it happens lots and often. Another thing that I notice, is that according to this bug, you're running munin version 1.2.5-1 which is the one released for etch. The cpu plugin was enhanced in munin version 1.2.6, which is packaged for lenny. Bad copy/paste. It applies to lenny, not etch (bug report accordingly modified). -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#554003: munin cpu plugin has too strict limits (#554003)
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Tom Feiner wrote: Peter Palfrader wrote: On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Tom Feiner wrote: Bad copy/paste. It applies to lenny, not etch (bug report accordingly modified). Thanks for updating the found version. After digging a bit more, this looks like the same issue as debian bug [1] , which is fixed in testing. They used a similar fix as you proposed, only instead of increasing the MAX field slightly, they removed it completely. This is also the same solution offered by upstream [2], only backported to munin 1.2.6. Can you test if munin from testing fixes your problem? http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/munin/1.2.6-17/610-plugin-cpu-fix-max.patch If that's the patch you are referring to then it very likely fixes my bug. It's a more brutal version of my patch, both will do. -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
