Re: NMU ncurses via testing-proposed-updates to fix #319554 ?
Daniel Baumann writes ("Re: NMU ncurses via testing-proposed-updates to fix
#319554 ?"):
> has been uploaded; will ask for freeze exception together with a bunch
> of other packages mid of next week.
Fantastic, thanks.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NMU ncurses via testing-proposed-updates to fix #319554 ?
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Daniel Baumann writes ("Re: NMU ncurses via testing-proposed-updates to fix
> #319554 ?"):
>> Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Would the release team and maintainer welcome an NMU to fix this ?
>> no; give me time until the end of the week to handle it properly.
>
> Great, thanks.
has been uploaded; will ask for freeze exception together with a bunch
of other packages mid of next week.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NMU ncurses via testing-proposed-updates to fix #319554 ?
Daniel Baumann writes ("Re: NMU ncurses via testing-proposed-updates to fix
#319554 ?"):
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Would the release team and maintainer welcome an NMU to fix this ?
>
> no; give me time until the end of the week to handle it properly.
Great, thanks.
> > I wrote two weeks ago that I would offer an NMU and I have had no
> > response other than a content-free dissent from Thomas Dickey (who is
> > not ncurses maintainer and who is also wrong and terse to the point of
> > opacity - see below).
>
> well, Thomas is the upstream maintainer.. and a very fine one, if I may
> add so.
I see. Err, well, he seems to be having some difficulty communicating
to me how fine and right he is, at least on this issue.
> > I see the version in unstable has a new upstream version so I assume
> > that we've essentially forked this package now ? Or, Daniel, do you
> > plan to request a freeze exception for the latest updates ?
>
> yes, because of the eterm-256 addition.
Right.
> > This,
> > macos$ ssh -t [EMAIL PROTECTED] screen
> > is a very common case.
>
> s/root/$random_user_account/ *scnr*
Indeed.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NMU ncurses via testing-proposed-updates to fix #319554 ?
Ian Jackson wrote: > Would the release team and maintainer welcome an NMU to fix this ? no; give me time until the end of the week to handle it properly. > I wrote two weeks ago that I would offer an NMU and I have had no > response other than a content-free dissent from Thomas Dickey (who is > not ncurses maintainer and who is also wrong and terse to the point of > opacity - see below). well, Thomas is the upstream maintainer.. and a very fine one, if I may add so. > I see the version in unstable has a new upstream version so I assume > that we've essentially forked this package now ? Or, Daniel, do you > plan to request a freeze exception for the latest updates ? yes, because of the eterm-256 addition. > This, > macos$ ssh -t [EMAIL PROTECTED] screen > is a very common case. s/root/$random_user_account/ *scnr* -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
