Re: emacs23 23.2+1-7 suitable for squeeze?

2010-12-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 11:43 -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
 emacs23 (23.2+1-7) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Don't initialize the terminal twice.  Previously a console-mode
 Emacs would send the escape sequence to switch to the alternate
 screen twice. At a minimum, this caused problems with screen.
 Thanks to Courtney Bane debian-bugs-5...@cbane.org for the
 report and the patch. (closes: #599463)
 
   * Fix the value for RIPEMD-160 in epg-digest-algorithm-alist
 according to RFC 4880.  Thanks to Daniel Kahn Gillmor
 d...@fifthhorseman.net for the report and the fix.
 (closes: #594510)
 
  -- Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org  Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:00:07 -0600

Unblocked; thanks.

 emacs23 (23.2+1-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Build-depend on bsd-mailx | mailx rather than just mailx since
 the latter is a virtual package.  Thanks to Cyril Brulebois
 k...@debian.org for the report, and thanks to Mehdi Dogguy
 me...@debian.org for the 23.2+1-5.1 NMU. (closes: #600826)

As a side note, because -6 was never uploaded, -7 should have been built
using dpkg-buildpackage -v, so that the .changes for -7 included the
stanza from -6.  This is to ensure that the BTS knows that the emacs23
package now in unstable includes the fix for #600826; I've just fixed
the version information, but as things were the BTS believed that the
bug had been re-introduced in -6.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1292176598.3595.856.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org



Re: emacs23 23.2+1-7 suitable for squeeze?

2010-12-12 Thread Rob Browning
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:

 As a side note, because -6 was never uploaded, -7 should have been built
 using dpkg-buildpackage -v, so that the .changes for -7 included the
 stanza from -6.  This is to ensure that the BTS knows that the emacs23
 package now in unstable includes the fix for #600826; I've just fixed
 the version information, but as things were the BTS believed that the
 bug had been re-introduced in -6.

Ahh, OK.  Sorry I overlooked that.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ei9m8nfh@raven.defaultvalue.org