Re: first pass at KDE/JACK hint, openssl disaster, etc.
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And openssh-krb5 needs to be rebuilt for the same reason (kdeutils depends on it). Huh? Where are you seeing that? That makes no sense and absolutely should not be the case. Are you sure you're not just seeing output picking up one of multiple possible sources for the ssh pseudopackage? -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: first pass at KDE/JACK hint, openssl disaster, etc.
* Russ Allbery [Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:10:06 -0700]: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And openssh-krb5 needs to be rebuilt for the same reason (kdeutils depends on it). Huh? Where are you seeing that? That makes no sense and absolutely should not be the case. Are you sure you're not just seeing output picking up one of multiple possible sources for the ssh pseudopackage? He is. kdessh Depends: openssh-client | ssh-client -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but That's funny... -- Isaac Asimov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: first pass at KDE/JACK hint, openssl disaster, etc.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 04:38:29AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: DO NOT upload packages built against libssl-dev or libssl0.9.8. All packages should be built against libssl0.9.7-dev (libssl0.9.7) at this time. I intend to drop the libssl0.9.7-dev package in the next upload, which I hope to do soon. I don't think it's a good idea to keep that -dev package around. Unless the release team ask me to keep it around, I'll remove it. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: first pass at KDE/JACK hint, openssl disaster, etc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kurt Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 04:38:29AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: DO NOT upload packages built against libssl-dev or libssl0.9.8. All packages should be built against libssl0.9.7-dev (libssl0.9.7) at this time. I intend to drop the libssl0.9.7-dev package in the next upload, which I hope to do soon. I don't think it's a good idea to keep that -dev package around. Unless the release team ask me to keep it around, I'll remove it. I would be very surprised if the release team would ask you to keep it around (due to conversations on IRC). Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDTUti5UTeB5t8Mo0RAgdTAKC5kCcXoLz2ua/n7svUYRsKxLrJwwCgmIBN Pohej6Qj3nr6pm+BLiJnjUg= =6cWY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
