Re: transition of packages into testing where Build-Depends can't be fulfilled for some architecture

2017-01-22 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Hello Emilo,

Am 22.01.2017 um 23:36 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> Changing the architecture doesn't help and is not needed. You can revert that 
> in
> your next upload.
> 
> The issue is that the kicad-common package went from arch:all to arch:any, and
> the arch:all package is still around. The arch:all package was available to
> mips64el and s390x, and that confuses britney when switching to arch:any and
> being unavailable on some architectures.
> 
> The solution here is to file a removal bug for kicad-common_4.0.5+dfsg1-1
> against ftp.debian.org

thanks for this helpful information! I wasn't aware of that reason why
britney isn't showing the expected view. I will revert my last change
about the architectures in a future upload.

I think Adrian was much quicker than me about the removal request you
suggested, thanks Adrian for filing the RM bug.

https://bugs.debian.org/852262

-- 
Regards
Carsten Schoenert



Re: transition of packages into testing where Build-Depends can't be fulfilled for some architecture

2017-01-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 19/01/17 07:53, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> for some time I'm working on the package kicad [1] to help the current
> maintainer Georges Khaznadar. Georges told me he currently haven't the
> needed time to get kicad fully prepared for the Stretch release and
> thankfully he gave me upload rights.
> 
> So I worked on the latest release of KiCad v4.0.5 and prepared the
> upload and changes for a Debian release.
> 
> KiCad is using a lot of the Boost libraries, so the package
> libboost-context-dev is also needed.
> As I've now have seen boost changed [2] the supported platforms for this
> package in 1.58.0.2 and only the platforms any-i386 any-amd64 armel
> armhf arm64 mips mipsel powerpc ppc64el are now provided with a package
> of libboost-context-dev.
> 
> Thus kicad isn't build able on mips64el and s390x [3]. And some other
> non RC platforms as well. So, now to my question, is this behavior
> preventing kicad to migrate into testing after the delay?
> Need I to change the Architecture field for the arch related packages of
> kicad then accordingly? As we are going on to the 26th January I would
> solve this issue before we would need to call for unblocking later.
> Or would kicad enter testing automatically and no further action is need
> for kicad?

Changing the architecture doesn't help and is not needed. You can revert that in
your next upload.

The issue is that the kicad-common package went from arch:all to arch:any, and
the arch:all package is still around. The arch:all package was available to
mips64el and s390x, and that confuses britney when switching to arch:any and
being unavailable on some architectures.

The solution here is to file a removal bug for kicad-common_4.0.5+dfsg1-1
against ftp.debian.org

Cheers,
Emilio