Typo3 version number for wheezy
Hi there, currently TYPO3 4.5.19+dfsg1-2 is in testing. A security bulletin was published yesterday and i prepared a new version of the package. I want to name it 4.5.19+dfsg1-2+wheezy1 because i hope this is the version that goes into wheezy and want to communicate, that this is not the vanilla upstream package. Is this version ok for you? -- MfG, Christian Welzel GPG-Key: 4096R/5117E119 2011-09-19 Fingerprint: 3688 337C 0D3E 3725 94EC E401 8D52 CDE9 5117 E119 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/509cdf57.9070...@camlann.de
Re: Typo3 version number for wheezy
On 2012-11-09 10:47, Christian Welzel wrote: currently TYPO3 4.5.19+dfsg1-2 is in testing. A security bulletin was published yesterday and i prepared a new version of the package. I want to name it 4.5.19+dfsg1-2+wheezy1 because i hope this is the version that goes into wheezy and want to communicate, that this is not the vanilla upstream package. Is this version ok for you? Unofficial NACK; the same version is in sid and wheezy, so the correct version is either 4.5.19+dfsg1-3 or 4.5.19+dfsg2-1, however you want to express best the modification, and targetting sid. Alternatively persuade upstream to make a proper minimal release with an incremented version. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7e3355c07e2b6631b19ccbb12ffaa...@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net
Re: Typo3 version number for wheezy
Am 09.11.2012 13:48, schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: currently TYPO3 4.5.19+dfsg1-2 is in testing. A security bulletin was published yesterday and i prepared a new version of the package. I want to name it 4.5.19+dfsg1-2+wheezy1 because i hope this is the version that goes into wheezy and want to communicate, that this is not the vanilla upstream package. Is this version ok for you? Unofficial NACK; the same version is in sid and wheezy, so the correct version is either 4.5.19+dfsg1-3 or 4.5.19+dfsg2-1, however you want to express best the modification, and targetting sid. Alternatively persuade upstream to make a proper minimal release with an incremented version. The latest official release of TYPO3 4.5 branch is 4.5.21 which contains other bugfixes too (4.5.20 was skipped because of the freeze). So when i name it 4.5.19+dfsg1-3, it will enter wheezy by this version number, and peoeple could think, it is a security buggy version. But this new version contains the bugfixes backported from 4.5.21. And this is not really expressed by 4.5.19+dfsg1-3. After the freeze i can upload 4.5.21 or later to unstable and all will be ok. I dont believe, that a complete new version 4.5.21 will get a freeze exception, will it? -- MfG, Christian Welzel GPG-Key: 4096R/5117E119 2011-09-19 Fingerprint: 3688 337C 0D3E 3725 94EC E401 8D52 CDE9 5117 E119 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/509d0665.8030...@camlann.de
Re: Typo3 version number for wheezy
On 2012-11-09 13:34, Christian Welzel wrote: Am 09.11.2012 13:48, schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: currently TYPO3 4.5.19+dfsg1-2 is in testing. A security bulletin was published yesterday and i prepared a new version of the package. I want to name it 4.5.19+dfsg1-2+wheezy1 because i hope this is the version that goes into wheezy and want to communicate, that this is not the vanilla upstream package. Is this version ok for you? Unofficial NACK; the same version is in sid and wheezy, so the correct version is either 4.5.19+dfsg1-3 or 4.5.19+dfsg2-1, however you want to express best the modification, and targetting sid. Alternatively persuade upstream to make a proper minimal release with an incremented version. The latest official release of TYPO3 4.5 branch is 4.5.21 which contains other bugfixes too (4.5.20 was skipped because of the freeze). So when i name it 4.5.19+dfsg1-3, it will enter wheezy by this version number, and peoeple could think, it is a security buggy version. But this new version contains the bugfixes backported from 4.5.21. And this is not really expressed by 4.5.19+dfsg1-3. I fail to see how '+wheezy1' communicates this any better. Release extensions are for squeezing versions in between suites. In either of these cases the user is still going to have to inspect the package to see what changed. You could add a NEWS entry detailing it, but that's likely to be noise for the majority of users. After the freeze i can upload 4.5.21 or later to unstable and all will be ok. I dont believe, that a complete new version 4.5.21 will get a freeze exception, will it? Not unless it is purely RC-bug fixes, no. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/48b4d6512d1851a74a2c61eab9f91...@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net
Re: Typo3 version number for wheezy
Am 09.11.2012 14:41, schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: You could add a NEWS entry detailing it, but that's likely to be noise for the majority of users. Is it ok to make the version of the package 4-5.19+dfsg1-3 and add a -pl1 to the internal version number of the app which gets displayed to the user? Then he can clearly see the updated version but the debian version does not get messed up? -- MfG, Christian Welzel GPG-Key: 4096R/5117E119 2011-09-19 Fingerprint: 3688 337C 0D3E 3725 94EC E401 8D52 CDE9 5117 E119 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/509d6183.3040...@camlann.de
Re: Typo3 version number for wheezy
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:03:15PM +0100, Christian Welzel wrote: Am 09.11.2012 14:41, schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: You could add a NEWS entry detailing it, but that's likely to be noise for the majority of users. Is it ok to make the version of the package 4-5.19+dfsg1-3 and add a -pl1 to the internal version number of the app which gets displayed to the user? Then he can clearly see the updated version but the debian version does not get messed up? I can't see a problem with this approach. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121109224113.gc22...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net
Re: Typo3 version number for wheezy
Hi Christian, (I owe you a private reply...) On Freitag, 9. November 2012, Christian Welzel wrote: Is it ok to make the version of the package 4-5.19+dfsg1-3 and add a -pl1 to the internal version number of the app which gets displayed to the user? Then he can clearly see the updated version but the debian version does not get messed up? if it has the security patches of 4.5.21 you could also make it -p4.5.21 (and not just -p11 or p21) to express this more clearly...! :) cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201211100256.33094.hol...@layer-acht.org
