exception request (was: Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition)

2010-08-11 Thread Ricardo Mones
 Hi,

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:13:04PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
  Nikita,
 
  On 08/06/2010 02:47 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
   I'm afraid that as this hasn't started it's transition yet, it seems
   that there won't be space in the queue for this one, so I'm afraid we
   can't handle the transition.
  
   Apologies for the inconvenience,
  
   :(
  
   I'm just a few days back from vacation, and have to resolve urgent
   work issues now. But I hoped to get to debian stuff almost today or
   tomorrow.
  
   Is the situation lost for squeze, or there will be another window?
  
   Nikita
 
  there isn't likely another window for transitions in squeeze, sorry.
 
 Very sad :(.
 Bad luck to have vacation exactly at the same dates when upload window was 
 open :(
 
 Anyway, I have package ready, and may upload within an hour if there will 
 be any chance to do so.

  Yep, this unlucky coincidence has also caught me by surprise.

  Given the affected packages are just a few and it seems all the involved
  maintainers seem to be now on guard, is it possible to request a freeze
  exception and let this pico-transition to happen?
  
  Chances of something going wrong are very low: the version Nikita wants
  to upload is practically the same as current in Squeeze and has been
  extensively tested in claws-mail, but surely users will appreciate having
  the latest bugfixes.

  thanks in advance for any response,
-- 
  Ricardo Mones 
  ~
  Don't take the name of root in vain.  /usr/src/linux/README



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-08-10 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
 Nikita,

 On 08/06/2010 02:47 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
  I'm afraid that as this hasn't started it's transition yet, it seems
  that there won't be space in the queue for this one, so I'm afraid we
  can't handle the transition.
 
  Apologies for the inconvenience,
 
  :(
 
  I'm just a few days back from vacation, and have to resolve urgent
  work issues now. But I hoped to get to debian stuff almost today or
  tomorrow.
 
  Is the situation lost for squeze, or there will be another window?
 
  Nikita

 there isn't likely another window for transitions in squeeze, sorry.

Very sad :(.
Bad luck to have vacation exactly at the same dates when upload window was 
open :(

Anyway, I have package ready, and may upload within an hour if there will 
be any chance to do so.

Nikita


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-08-06 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
 On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:21:03PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
  On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 10:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
   On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:36, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
   I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is
   already
 
  [...]
 
Could you please notify me then when it is correct moment to
upload?
   
Yes, no problem.
  
   Please go ahead.
 
  Just a quick ping, as I noticed that the new libetpan hasn't been
  uploaded yet.

 Hi Nikita,

 I'm afraid that as this hasn't started it's transition yet, it seems
 that there won't be space in the queue for this one, so I'm afraid we
 can't handle the transition.

 Apologies for the inconvenience,

:(

I'm just a few days back from vacation, and have to resolve urgent work 
issues now. But I hoped to get to debian stuff almost today or tomorrow.

Is the situation lost for squeze, or there will be another window?

Nikita


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-08-06 Thread Philipp Kern

Nikita,

On 08/06/2010 02:47 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:

I'm afraid that as this hasn't started it's transition yet, it seems
that there won't be space in the queue for this one, so I'm afraid we
can't handle the transition.

Apologies for the inconvenience,
 

:(

I'm just a few days back from vacation, and have to resolve urgent work
issues now. But I hoped to get to debian stuff almost today or tomorrow.

Is the situation lost for squeze, or there will be another window?

Nikita
   


there isn't likely another window for transitions in squeeze, sorry.

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c5c04b5.7000...@debian.org



Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-08-05 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:21:03PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 10:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
  On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
   On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:36, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
  I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is already
 [...]
   Could you please notify me then when it is correct moment to upload?
  
   Yes, no problem.
  
  Please go ahead.
 
 Just a quick ping, as I noticed that the new libetpan hasn't been
 uploaded yet.
 

Hi Nikita,

I'm afraid that as this hasn't started it's transition yet, it seems
that there won't be space in the queue for this one, so I'm afraid we
can't handle the transition.

Apologies for the inconvenience,
Neil
-- 
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100805233833.ga9...@halon.org.uk



Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-07-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:36, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is already
 in
experimental), to have it released with squeeze.
 [...]
  I'm ready to upload at any moment.

 Please don't do so at the moment.

 We're currently part way through the python2.6 transition and will need
 to rule out potential conflicts with that before starting any further
 transitions.

 Could you please notify me then when it is correct moment to upload?

 Yes, no problem.

Please go ahead.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/ef529d6ac3b5693c52d4d1a24d73c147.squir...@adsl.funkybadger.org



Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-06-23 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
   I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is already in
   experimental), to have it released with squeeze.
  
   That will cause soname change, libetpan13 - libetpan15.
   Reverse-dependences are etpan-ng, claws-mail, and cairo-dock-plugins
  
   Is it ok to do that now?
 
  Have the reverse dependencies been tested with the new library?
 
  cairo-dock-plugins currently FTBFS, although the bug is marked as
  pending so would hopefully not be an issue.

   I've been running claws-mail with 1.0 without problem and seems
   cairo-dock-plugins problem has been solved, is there any other issue
   blocking the upload?

I'm ready to upload at any moment.

I may upload package same as in experimental, or I may remove .la file 
from -dev package. What is better?

Nikita


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201006231245.06...@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su



Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-06-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, June 23, 2010 09:45, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
   I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is already in
   experimental), to have it released with squeeze.
  
   That will cause soname change, libetpan13 - libetpan15.
   Reverse-dependences are etpan-ng, claws-mail, and cairo-dock-plugins
  
   Is it ok to do that now?
 
  Have the reverse dependencies been tested with the new library?
 
  cairo-dock-plugins currently FTBFS, although the bug is marked as
  pending so would hopefully not be an issue.

   I've been running claws-mail with 1.0 without problem and seems
   cairo-dock-plugins problem has been solved, is there any other issue
   blocking the upload?

 I'm ready to upload at any moment.

Please don't do so at the moment.

We're currently part way through the python2.6 transition and will need to
rule out potential conflicts with that before starting any further
transitions.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/a04bf05896bc00b1a6286b76169a62eb.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org



Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-06-23 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is already in
experimental), to have it released with squeeze.
   
That will cause soname change, libetpan13 - libetpan15.
Reverse-dependences are etpan-ng, claws-mail, and
cairo-dock-plugins
   
Is it ok to do that now?
  
   Have the reverse dependencies been tested with the new library?
  
   cairo-dock-plugins currently FTBFS, although the bug is marked as
   pending so would hopefully not be an issue.
 
I've been running claws-mail with 1.0 without problem and seems
cairo-dock-plugins problem has been solved, is there any other
  issue blocking the upload?
 
  I'm ready to upload at any moment.

 Please don't do so at the moment.

 We're currently part way through the python2.6 transition and will need
 to rule out potential conflicts with that before starting any further
 transitions.

Could you please notify me then when it is correct moment to upload?

Nikita


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201006231736.20...@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su



Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-06-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, June 23, 2010 14:36, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is already in
experimental), to have it released with squeeze.
[...]
  I'm ready to upload at any moment.

 Please don't do so at the moment.

 We're currently part way through the python2.6 transition and will need
 to rule out potential conflicts with that before starting any further
 transitions.

 Could you please notify me then when it is correct moment to upload?

Yes, no problem.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/8fa33362b3774edc26ececbffe73.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org



Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-06-22 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Wed, 19 May 2010 21:25:50 +0100
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:

 On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 10:36 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: 
  I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is already in 
  experimental), to have it released with squeeze.
  
  That will cause soname change, libetpan13 - libetpan15.
  Reverse-dependences are etpan-ng, claws-mail, and cairo-dock-plugins
  
  Is it ok to do that now?
 
 Have the reverse dependencies been tested with the new library?
 
 cairo-dock-plugins currently FTBFS, although the bug is marked as
 pending so would hopefully not be an issue.

  I've been running claws-mail with 1.0 without problem and seems
  cairo-dock-plugins problem has been solved, is there any other issue
  blocking the upload?

  regards,
-- 
 Ricardo Mones
 http://people.debian.org/~mones
 «Q: What do you call a boomerang that doesn't come back? A: A stick.»


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-05-20 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Wed, 19 May 2010 21:25:50 +0100
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:

 On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 10:36 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: 
  I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is already in 
  experimental), to have it released with squeeze.
  
  That will cause soname change, libetpan13 - libetpan15.
  Reverse-dependences are etpan-ng, claws-mail, and cairo-dock-plugins
  
  Is it ok to do that now?  
 
 Have the reverse dependencies been tested with the new library?

  Latest upload of claws-mail (already in testing) includes support for it,
  so it should be no problem regarding this.

  regards,
-- 
 Ricardo Mones
 http://people.debian.org/~mones
 «You need no longer worry about the future. This time tomorrow you'll 
 be dead.»


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-05-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
  I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is already in
  experimental), to have it released with squeeze.
 
  That will cause soname change, libetpan13 - libetpan15.
  Reverse-dependences are etpan-ng, claws-mail, and cairo-dock-plugins
 
  Is it ok to do that now?

 Have the reverse dependencies been tested with the new library?

I don't know, however changes in libetpan library, compared to previous 
version, are minor, so problems are not expected.

People, could you please check your packages against libetpan from 
experimental?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201005201012.17...@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su



Re: libetpan13 - libetpan15 mini-transition

2010-05-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 10:36 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: 
 I would like to upload libetpan 1.0 to unstable (it is already in 
 experimental), to have it released with squeeze.
 
 That will cause soname change, libetpan13 - libetpan15.
 Reverse-dependences are etpan-ng, claws-mail, and cairo-dock-plugins
 
 Is it ok to do that now?

Have the reverse dependencies been tested with the new library?

cairo-dock-plugins currently FTBFS, although the bug is marked as
pending so would hopefully not be an issue.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1274300750.21123.248.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net