Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:10:02AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:10:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: Are security updates visible at this point in the install. I think they are (except for network-less installs). No. Bummer, but at least it fixes upgrades. luk_work 22:55:11 dannf: from SRM's POV the security update for the kernel on arm is a go! So I'm planning to proceed. Last build (hppa) just came in, so its released. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:10:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: Are security updates visible at this point in the install. I think they are (except for network-less installs). No. Bastian -- Our missions are peaceful -- not for conquest. When we do battle, it is only because we have no choice. -- Kirk, The Squire of Gothos, stardate 2124.5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:10:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: Are security updates visible at this point in the install. I think they are (except for network-less installs). No. Bummer, but at least it fixes upgrades. luk_work 22:55:11 dannf: from SRM's POV the security update for the kernel on arm is a go! So I'm planning to proceed. * waldi 00:21:19 detex: dannf don't wait for a correction of its own assumptions and makes the problem worser Well, I did wait - but I let the buildds do some work while I waited. You'll have to clarify what you mean by worser if you want to convince me to stop this. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On 2007-08-18, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the version 6, anything else 6etch1. This is a serious problem as arm will be uninstallable now and no machine gets new security uploads. I'm sure this is my fault, sorry about that. Is it possible to update this before r2? You could release a new linux-latest-2.6 package pointing to the new arm kernel images in a DSA-1356-2. Are security updates visible at this point in the install. I think they are (except for network-less installs). And I assume we'd want to do a 6etch2 instead of trying to shoehorn in a build of 6etch1? Does anyone object to this? -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:10:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 11:52:52AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On 2007-08-18, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the version 6, anything else 6etch1. This is a serious problem as arm will be uninstallable now and no machine gets new security uploads. I'm sure this is my fault, sorry about that. Is it possible to update this before r2? You could release a new linux-latest-2.6 package pointing to the new arm kernel images in a DSA-1356-2. Are security updates visible at this point in the install. I think they are (except for network-less installs). And I assume we'd want to do a 6etch2 instead of trying to shoehorn in a build of 6etch1? Does anyone object to this? No objections voiced so far, so I've uploaded to security-master. I'll plan to release once the buildds finish. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
On 2007-08-18, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the version 6, anything else 6etch1. This is a serious problem as arm will be uninstallable now and no machine gets new security uploads. I'm sure this is my fault, sorry about that. Is it possible to update this before r2? You could release a new linux-latest-2.6 package pointing to the new arm kernel images in a DSA-1356-2. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the version 6, anything else 6etch1. This is a serious problem as arm will be uninstallable now and no machine gets new security uploads. Bastian -- ... The prejudices people feel about each other disappear when they get to know each other. -- Kirk, Elaan of Troyius, stardate 4372.5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the version 6, anything else 6etch1. This is a serious problem as arm will be uninstallable now and no machine gets new security uploads. I'm sure this is my fault, sorry about that. Is it possible to update this before r2? I can build/upload an arm pkg, but probably not before Monday (I'll need to go physically reset my netwinder). -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-latest-2.6 update in stable incomplete
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:10:16PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:20:11PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi folks The linux-latest-2.6 update in 4.0r1 was incomplete. arm still have the version 6, anything else 6etch1. This is a serious problem as arm will be uninstallable now and no machine gets new security uploads. I'm sure this is my fault, sorry about that. Is it possible to update this before r2? By definition, no; pushing a new package into stable is pushing a point release. Unfortunately this isn't the only regression in r1, so there's some incentive to have r2 happen soon. I can build/upload an arm pkg, but probably not before Monday (I'll need to go physically reset my netwinder). I imagine that's soon enough, I don't think folks are going to be ready to do an r2 before then. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
