Re: Fwd: Re: not co-installable Multi-Arch:same packages
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 01:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: a few Multi-Arch: same packages have all their dependencies satisfied, but are not co-installable because they got binNMUs. A sourceful no-change upload to rebuild them should restore co-installability. I've identified 8 source packages where this would help: bogl delay, retry for r1 (udeb) clutter-gst pending libdmtx done (me) libftdi delay, retry for r1 (nontrivial but probably harmless python dependency changes) libopenraw delay, retry for r1 (symbol changes, ftbfs with DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL=0) libpano13 done (maintainer) lua-sql pending myodbc pending Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/517e7a1f.2060...@debian.org
Re: Fwd: Re: not co-installable Multi-Arch:same packages
Andreas Beckmann, le Sat 27 Apr 2013 13:06:55 +0200, a écrit : you might consider doing a no-change upload for your package to get rid of a bin-NMU and restore multiarch co-installability. I'm unsure we want to risk anything with bogl, as it is used in the debian installer, even if the installer is already uploaded as RC2. I don't see any reverse dependency for the co-installable package, libbogl0, so I don't consider it very useful to risk anything here. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130429202224.gf7...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
Re: Fwd: Re: not co-installable Multi-Arch:same packages
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (29/04/2013): Andreas Beckmann, le Sat 27 Apr 2013 13:06:55 +0200, a écrit : you might consider doing a no-change upload for your package to get rid of a bin-NMU and restore multiarch co-installability. I'm unsure we want to risk anything with bogl, as it is used in the debian installer, even if the installer is already uploaded as RC2. I don't see any reverse dependency for the co-installable package, libbogl0, so I don't consider it very useful to risk anything here. Now is not the time to work around dpkg's being unable to handle binNMU'd m-a packages. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: not co-installable Multi-Arch:same packages
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 01:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: a few Multi-Arch: same packages have all their dependencies satisfied, but are not co-installable because they got binNMUs. A sourceful no-change upload to rebuild them should restore co-installability. I've identified 8 source packages where this would help: bogl clutter-gst libdmtx libftdi libopenraw libpano13 lua-sql myodbc Note that such issues are not RC for wheezy. If the maintainers are interested in fixing them, I might be minded to accept such changes, but it would need to be /very/ soon. I have to admit to being concerned about changes that might be introduced by a rebuild of a package in unstable after several months though... Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367050916.13168.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: not co-installable Multi-Arch:same packages
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 09:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 01:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: a few Multi-Arch: same packages have all their dependencies satisfied, but are not co-installable because they got binNMUs. A sourceful no-change upload to rebuild them should restore co-installability. I've identified 8 source packages where this would help: [...] Note that such issues are not RC for wheezy. If the maintainers are interested in fixing them, I might be minded to accept such changes, but it would need to be /very/ soon. I have to admit to being concerned about changes that might be introduced by a rebuild of a package in unstable after several months though... Alternatively, we can look at fixing these issues for the first point release. That gives us more time to evaluate any potential side-effects of the rebuilds. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367051272.13168.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Fwd: Re: not co-installable Multi-Arch:same packages
Dear maintainers, you might consider doing a no-change upload for your package to get rid of a bin-NMU and restore multiarch co-installability. Ensure to build in a really clean sid chroot, otherwise another binNMU could be required to fix your package and break MA co-installability again. If you file an unblock request, you should include a *binary* debdiff to the packages in testing, too, to ensure no library dependencies from unstable get picked up. On 2013-04-27 10:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 01:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: a few Multi-Arch: same packages have all their dependencies satisfied, but are not co-installable because they got binNMUs. A sourceful no-change upload to rebuild them should restore co-installability. I've identified 8 source packages where this would help: bogl clutter-gst libdmtx libftdi libopenraw libpano13 lua-sql myodbc Note that such issues are not RC for wheezy. If the maintainers are interested in fixing them, I might be minded to accept such changes, but it would need to be /very/ soon. I have to admit to being concerned about changes that might be introduced by a rebuild of a package in unstable after several months though... On 2013-04-27 10:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Alternatively, we can look at fixing these issues for the first point release. That gives us more time to evaluate any potential side-effects of the rebuilds. Andreas PS: libdmtx would have to go via t-p-u, I'll look into this in more detail because there is another issue, too -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/517bb14f.5060...@debian.org
Re: not co-installable Multi-Arch:same packages
[adding -release@] Hi, a few Multi-Arch: same packages have all their dependencies satisfied, but are not co-installable because they got binNMUs. A sourceful no-change upload to rebuild them should restore co-installability. I've identified 8 source packages where this would help: bogl clutter-gst libdmtx libftdi libopenraw libpano13 lua-sql myodbc Note: I only tested co-installing amd64 + i386 packages. Perhaps there are some more binNMUs hidden in other architectures. On 2013-04-25 21:27, Andreas Beckmann wrote: On 2013-04-22 21:38, Andreas Beckmann wrote: On 2013-04-22 07:31, Guillem Jover wrote: I guess a way to detect those could be piuparts runs that install multiple instances of Multi-Arch:same packages, purge just one of ... Actually I already tried something similar some time ago, although I only focussed on co-installability problems. I didn't look into this ... I just reran these tests (host: amd64, installing the foreign i386 packages) on current wheezy and will provide a short report here: Many packages marked M-A:same are not co-installable due to unsatisfied dependencies (usually not all deps are properly multiarchified). That's not a problem right now, apt will take care of this. But there are some packages that qualify as co-installable, but fail to do so: Uninstallable due to binNMU: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libbogl0/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libbogl0:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libclutter-gst-1.0-0/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libclutter-gst-1.0-0:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libclutter-gst-1.0-dbg/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libclutter-gst-1.0-dbg:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libdmtx0a/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libdmtx0a:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libftdi1-dbg/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libftdi1-dbg:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libftdi1/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libftdi1:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libftdipp1-dbg/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libftdipp1-dbg:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libftdipp1/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libftdipp1:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libmyodbc/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libmyodbc:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libopenraw1/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libopenraw1:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libopenrawgnome1/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libopenrawgnome1:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libpano13-2/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libpano13-2:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/lua-sql-mysql-dev/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package lua-sql-mysql-dev:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/lua-sql-mysql/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package lua-sql-mysql:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/lua-sql-sqlite3-dev/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package lua-sql-sqlite3-dev:i386 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/lua-sql-sqlite3/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package lua-sql-sqlite3:i386 but otherwise dependencies are satisfied, so these might be candidates for no-change rebuilds to make them co-installable in wheezy. Looks like this is a manageable amount of source packages: bogl clutter-gst libdmtx libftdi libopenraw libpano13 lua-sql myodbc Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/517b119e.70...@debian.org
