unblock request: upgrade-system
Greetings, I was wondering why src:upgrade-system hadn't entered Testing after 10 days and only noticed now that we have already entered The Freeze. Hurray! On the other hand, this means that I hereby need to request a freeze unblock for this recent upload. Most changes are mere polishing of what was already started in 1.6.2.0 (cleaning up debian/copyright and using --long-options for everything). There is exactly one new feature in the cron job and even then it's a minor one. Looking forward to the Release Team's response. Best Regards, Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPZXPQeT=sdfkky18z_p4har8gttpdwjtg7vo-_26bbk4m-...@mail.gmail.com
Re: unblock request: upgrade-system
Hello, Martin-Éric Racine (16/07/2012): > I was wondering why src:upgrade-system hadn't entered Testing after 10 > days and only noticed now that we have already entered The Freeze. … > On the other hand, this means that I hereby need to request a freeze > unblock for this recent upload. > > Most changes are mere polishing of what was already started in 1.6.2.0 > (cleaning up debian/copyright and using --long-options for > everything). There is exactly one new feature in the cron job and even > then it's a minor one. even if the diff is indeed tiny, I don't think it matches the rules described at: http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html (linked from the freeze announcement). Given there's no actual bug fix, I think the current package will stay in unstable. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: unblock request: upgrade-system
Hello again, 2012/7/16 Cyril Brulebois : > Martin-Éric Racine (16/07/2012): >> Most changes are mere polishing of what was already started in 1.6.2.0 >> (cleaning up debian/copyright and using --long-options for >> everything). There is exactly one new feature in the cron job and even >> then it's a minor one. > > even if the diff is indeed tiny, I don't think it matches the rules > described at: http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html > (linked from the freeze announcement). 6. as above, important changes that the maintainer feels are needed before release. Those changes were done with the specific goal of covering oversights from 1.6.2.0 on time for the release, thus why I feel they are needed for Wheezy. Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/capzxpqeajjmbikbo1xcyt0qp1hl5g6zxzttw3vevmptenrr...@mail.gmail.com
