Bug#816101: petsc: FTBFS on mipsel - try rebuild again
On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 19:59 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > [Adding debian-wb-team back to Cc] > > On 13/03/16 17:56, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 17:35 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > > > > On 13/03/16 16:34, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > > > What would make mipsel different to other architectures or from the > > earlier successful mipsel build? It's the same petsc. > petsc may be at the same version, but the environment has changed. > It may be a bug in another package (e.g. an rdep) or a bug in petsc > that was latent until now. > > > > > > > Have you checked if it builds fine on a porterbox? > > I tried but sbuild wouldn't work inside the schroot environment on > > etler. > Did you read the MOTD? See https://dsa.debian.org/doc/schroot/ I missed that. I'll add it to my bookmarks. > Anyway given the build queue is currently empty on mipsel, I've given > it back. > Let's see if the problem is fixed now... Thanks for that. It's showing a very different build failure now, as if something is wrong with mpi (openmpi). I'll follow those schroot instructions and look directly. Drew -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#816101: petsc: FTBFS on mipsel - try rebuild again
[Adding debian-wb-team back to Cc] On 13/03/16 17:56, Drew Parsons wrote: On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 17:35 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 13/03/16 16:34, Drew Parsons wrote: Source: petsc Followup-For: Bug #816101 The petsc build failure on mipsel appears to be a transient problem on the build machine. Please try the mipsel build again. Why? It has failed twice already. What would make mipsel different to other architectures or from the earlier successful mipsel build? It's the same petsc. petsc may be at the same version, but the environment has changed. It may be a bug in another package (e.g. an rdep) or a bug in petsc that was latent until now. Have you checked if it builds fine on a porterbox? I tried but sbuild wouldn't work inside the schroot environment on etler. Did you read the MOTD? See https://dsa.debian.org/doc/schroot/ Anyway given the build queue is currently empty on mipsel, I've given it back. Let's see if the problem is fixed now... Emilio -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Poly/ML 5.6-3
Hi, > On 13 Mar 2016, at 09:48, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: >> Added in >> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/keyring/keyring.git/commit/?id=bb8f943a3b54332b65cf4a64644e9e8b57bdbdcf. > > ok :) > > please do source-only uploads, or use pbuilder/sbuild to generate the > binaries. > If you are in doubt, don't hesitate to ask me or to the debian-mentors list :) > > $ dcut -k 92978A6E195E4921825F7FF0F34F09744E9F5DD9 ftp-master dm --uid "James > Clarke" --allow polyml > Uploading commands file to ftp.upload.debian.org (incoming: /pub/UploadQueue/) > Picking DM James Clarke with fingerprint > 8F58342BEABE1EF4379551FBB193770C186A1C7D > > You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for > user: "Gianfranco Costamagna " > 4096-bit RSA key, ID 4E9F5DD9, created 2014-09-14 > > Uploading locutus-1457862406.dak-commands to ftp-master > > now you should be able to perform the uploads by yourself :) Thanks, and thank you once again for all your help! I’m sure you’ll still see me around the place, even if you won’t get any more of my emails asking you to do things for me :) James signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#816101: petsc: FTBFS on mipsel - try rebuild again
On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 17:35 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 13/03/16 16:34, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > Source: petsc > > Followup-For: Bug #816101 > > > > The petsc build failure on mipsel appears to be a transient problem > > on > > the build machine. Please try the mipsel build again. > Why? It has failed twice already. What would make mipsel different to other architectures or from the earlier successful mipsel build? It's the same petsc. > Have you checked if it builds fine on a porterbox? > I tried but sbuild wouldn't work inside the schroot environment on etler. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
apertium-fra-cat 1.1.0~r64309-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the apertium-fra-cat source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.1.0~r64309-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
apertium-swe 0.5.0~r66062-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the apertium-swe source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.5.0~r66062-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
apertium-nno-nob 1.1.0~r66076-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the apertium-nno-nob source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.1.0~r66076-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
apertium-fr-ca REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the apertium-fr-ca source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.3~r61322-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: (no removal hint found) The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#816101: petsc: FTBFS on mipsel - try rebuild again
On 13/03/16 16:34, Drew Parsons wrote: Source: petsc Followup-For: Bug #816101 The petsc build failure on mipsel appears to be a transient problem on the build machine. Please try the mipsel build again. Why? It has failed twice already. Have you checked if it builds fine on a porterbox? Emilio -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#816101: petsc: FTBFS on mipsel - try rebuild again
Source: petsc Followup-For: Bug #816101 The petsc build failure on mipsel appears to be a transient problem on the build machine. Please try the mipsel build again. gb petsc_3.6.2.dfsg1-3+b3 . mipsel -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#816101: petsc: FTBFS on mipsel - timeout while running the test suite
As far as I can tell this build failure is just some ephemeral problem on the build machine. The same code built before, and builds now on mips and other architectures. Trigger a rebuild, maybe it will work now. The orte/plm warning is a red herring. All architectures have the same problem. It's a warning not an error. In any case, I've uploaded v3.6.3 and invoked plm rather than orte. Hopefully once the new version is pushed through, the mipsel build will clear. Drew -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Re: Poly/ML 5.6-3
Hi, >Added in >http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/keyring/keyring.git/commit/?id=bb8f943a3b54332b65cf4a64644e9e8b57bdbdcf. ok :) please do source-only uploads, or use pbuilder/sbuild to generate the binaries. If you are in doubt, don't hesitate to ask me or to the debian-mentors list :) $ dcut -k 92978A6E195E4921825F7FF0F34F09744E9F5DD9 ftp-master dm --uid "James Clarke" --allow polyml Uploading commands file to ftp.upload.debian.org (incoming: /pub/UploadQueue/) Picking DM James Clarke with fingerprint 8F58342BEABE1EF4379551FBB193770C186A1C7D You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "Gianfranco Costamagna " 4096-bit RSA key, ID 4E9F5DD9, created 2014-09-14 Uploading locutus-1457862406.dak-commands to ftp-master now you should be able to perform the uploads by yourself :) cheers! Gianfranco -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
