Re: Squeeze release vs. tracker
On Wed, February 9, 2011 19:50, Francesco Poli wrote: On the other hand, the security tracker seems to still think that lenny is stable [1] and squeeze is testing [2], while I have been unable to find any traces of wheezy... Is there something that should be done manually, in order to let the tracker realize that squeeze is out? Is there any event that should happen before this can be done? I've changed the code right after squeeze's release. I've also restarted the tracker service. Apparently this is not enough - Florian, can you help? Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-tracker-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/9dcd3808ad5094069f613bad0e74a131.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
Re: Squeeze release vs. tracker
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:12:21 +0100 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, February 9, 2011 19:50, Francesco Poli wrote: On the other hand, the security tracker seems to still think that lenny is stable [1] and squeeze is testing [2], while I have been unable to find any traces of wheezy... Is there something that should be done manually, in order to let the tracker realize that squeeze is out? Is there any event that should happen before this can be done? I've changed the code right after squeeze's release. I've also restarted the tracker service. Apparently this is not enough - Florian, can you help? The Makefile also needs to change since that is used to download the release files that are parsed for package version info. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-tracker-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110209214059.5dc8741e.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com
Re: Squeeze release vs. tracker
On Thu, February 10, 2011 03:40, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:12:21 +0100 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, February 9, 2011 19:50, Francesco Poli wrote: On the other hand, the security tracker seems to still think that lenny is stable [1] and squeeze is testing [2], while I have been unable to find any traces of wheezy... Is there something that should be done manually, in order to let the tracker realize that squeeze is out? Is there any event that should happen before this can be done? I've changed the code right after squeeze's release. I've also restarted the tracker service. Apparently this is not enough - Florian, can you help? The Makefile also needs to change since that is used to download the release files that are parsed for package version info. Thanks, so that's what I've overlooked. I changed it now but (famous last words) I need to leave soon so I hope it didn't break too much. On the other hand, the tracker didn't work for wheezy now anyway. I skipped the volatile part as that has completely changed for squeeze so if someone wants to put the correct urls in there be my guest. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-tracker-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/071cd33e88baa4c34f9313f0f6a31300.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
