Re: wvdial and ultra 5?

2000-09-19 Thread Steve Bowman
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 10:17:26PM -0700, Jason Wright wrote:
 [snipped]
 I pulled one of my old pre-wvidal /etc/ppp/options out of mothballs and
 I was able to run with the port speed set to 115200.  Is there a way to
 get wvdial to run at a higher speed on this machine?

You were able to run at 115200 port speed on _this_ box?  I have an
Ultra 10 that'll only run pppd with a 38400 port speed.  It's the serial
controller chipset that limits it.  I don't remember OTTOMH which it
is and the machine's at another location I can't check at the moment.
I can check later if you need, but if it you have such a chipset, then
it's not a wvdial problem.

Steve

-- 
Steve Bowman  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred)
Buckeye, AZ   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.goodnet.com/~sbowman/

Powered by Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org



Re: wvdial and ultra 5?

2000-09-19 Thread Steve Bowman
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 10:45:47PM -0700, Jason Wright wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 10:40:24PM -0700, Steve Bowman spewed forth:
 
  You were able to run at 115200 port speed on _this_ box?  I have an
 
 For a couple of days, before switching back to wvdial.  I was getting
 10-11k throughput on news overview too, almost as good as the Pentium.

Well then, your serial controller should be a fast one.  Maybe it is
wvdial, or whatever it uses to detect serial port/modem capabilities.

 
 I was under the impression that the sun4u's have 115200 serial ports.  Am I
 mistaken?

The mistake may be mine.  I'll have to check that machine again to
be sure.  It's a Solaris box with free ppp on it.  I'm *sure* it will
only do 38400 since I had to d**k around with Sun's stupid aspppd until I
gave up on it and put a working ppp on it.  I'm not sure about the arch,
though.  It may be a SparcStation 10 (sun4m) - it's been awhile since
I've looked at it and for some reason this detail escapes me.  I'm trying
to arrange to replace it with an Ultra running Debian.  Does anyone know
what multi-port cards work with sparc linux, say 2.4.0-testx?

Steve

-- 
Steve Bowman  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred)
Buckeye, AZ   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.goodnet.com/~sbowman/

Powered by Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org



Re: howto to configure isdn and X in a sparcstation 10

2000-09-19 Thread Ottavio Campana
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 11:19:41PM +0200, digihans wrote:

 ISDN once worked for the ss10  and ss-LX. Unfortunately, this was only
 in kernel 2.3.0. The code is not supported anymore ;))

who's the mantainer oh the source? and why did they dismiss it?

 I tried to make a patch my self, but failed absolutely.

what did uoy  do? have you taken the  source of 2.3.0 and put  it in the
newst kernel?

Bye

-- 
Non c'è più forza nella normalità, c'è solo monotonia.



Weird working of X

2000-09-19 Thread Ottavio Campana
I'm using  windowmaker on my ss10  with a cg6 framebuffer.  I've noted a
strange behaviour of  X. When I run Wmakerconf or  gimp1.1 and the mouse
is on  the application window I  get the window correctly  displayed and
tha background has all the colors inverted. When the mouse is out of the
window on the background its colors are  ok and the colors of the window
are inverted.
I've  had the  idea that  it could  be a  gtk problem.  I wrote  a small
program with gtk, I ran it and it worked.
Does it happenat o other people this fact or just to me?
Do you know why it happens?

Bye

-- 
Non c'è più forza nella normalità, c'è solo monotonia.



Re: wvdial and ultra 5?

2000-09-19 Thread Pieter Krul
Jason Wright wrote:

 I pulled one of my old pre-wvidal /etc/ppp/options out of mothballs and
 I was able to run with the port speed set to 115200.  Is there a way to
 get wvdial to run at a higher speed on this machine?

My ZyXel TA128 runs at 460800 baud on my Ultra5, which is the maximum 
rate the TA itself can handle. I only use pppd and chat.

My guess it that wvdial tries to set/negotiate the baudrate, as it 
probably should on a PC, with a limit of 115200 baud. You could try 
using wvdial as a chat replacement. Perhaps forcing the ttya/b-mode 
on the PROM, or with `eeprom`, might perhaps(?) help as well, if your
modem supports the speeds you set it to.

Good serial cabling is also very important at higher speeds, but
that might be obvious :)

Pieter



Re: Weird working of X

2000-09-19 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 02:14:13PM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
 I'm using  windowmaker on my ss10  with a cg6 framebuffer.  I've noted a
 strange behaviour of  X. When I run Wmakerconf or  gimp1.1 and the mouse
 is on  the application window I  get the window correctly  displayed and
 tha background has all the colors inverted. When the mouse is out of the
 window on the background its colors are  ok and the colors of the window
 are inverted.
 I've  had the  idea that  it could  be a  gtk problem.  I wrote  a small
 program with gtk, I ran it and it worked.
 Does it happenat o other people this fact or just to me?
 Do you know why it happens?

You seem to only be supporting 256 colors. What you are experiencing is a
palette change. Basically, there are only 256 possible different colors
that can be displayed at any one time. When your applications are in the
foreground, they are adjusting the palette so they can show as many
possible colors for itself. This has the affect of turning the rest of the
colors to garbage (since they are still using the palette, but the colors
don't correspond to what it expects). This isn't gtk, it's the X system
doing this.

I think you can disable this somehow, so all apps use the same palatte.
Doesn't look very good for things like gimp, since it limits it's own
palette, but it'll avoid the palette shift. However, since I've always had
atleast 16bits (65k colors) when I use X, I'm not sure what the
configuration is to change it (maybe email debian-x, if someone here
doesn't know).

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: Weird working of X

2000-09-19 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote:

 On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 02:14:13PM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
  I'm using  windowmaker on my ss10  with a cg6 framebuffer.  I've noted a

 You seem to only be supporting 256 colors.

[good explanation of palette shift omitted]

 palette, but it'll avoid the palette shift. However, since I've always had
 atleast 16bits (65k colors) when I use X, I'm not sure what the
 configuration is to change it (maybe email debian-x, if someone here
 doesn't know).

I'm pretty sure the 256-color limit is a cg6 Sun hardware limit and
there's nothing you can do to change it.  (Certainly our Solaris 8
installations using the cg6 also only have 256 colors.)

-- 
Andy Dougherty  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Physics
Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042