Re: X problems on Ultra 5
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 06:29:02PM -0500, Ian Setford wrote: > Having a problem configuring Xfree86 to run on an Ultra 5 with an ATI Mach64 > card. When I run X, I get one quarter of an X screen with my Afterstep > background but then my machine is locked up locally. I can get in remotely. > My first guess is that I have an improperly configured XF86Config file. > Anyone have an Ultra5 able to share theirs? Below are some files that might > help debug this. > > Machine: Debian 3.x Unstable, 333MHz, 512MB RAM, kernel-image-2.4.19-sun4u Can you try 2.4.20-sun4u? It should work with 2.4.19-sun4u. I have a U5, so I know it works. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
X problems on Ultra 5
Having a problem configuring Xfree86 to run on an Ultra 5 with an ATI Mach64 card. When I run X, I get one quarter of an X screen with my Afterstep background but then my machine is locked up locally. I can get in remotely. My first guess is that I have an improperly configured XF86Config file. Anyone have an Ultra5 able to share theirs? Below are some files that might help debug this. Machine: Debian 3.x Unstable, 333MHz, 512MB RAM, kernel-image-2.4.19-sun4u XFree86.0.log: ** This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.Org and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs) XFree86 Version 4.2.1.1 (Debian 4.2.1-6 20030226131232 [EMAIL PROTECTED]) / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) Release Date: 18 October 2002 If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer than the above date, look for a newer version before reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/) Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.18 sparc [ELF] Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Mon May 5 17:39:28 2003 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" (==) ServerLayout "Simple Layout" (**) |-->Screen "Screen 1" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "My Monitor" (**) | |-->Device "ATI Mach64" (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse1" (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard1" (**) Option "AutoRepeat" "500 30" (**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc101" (**) XKB: model: "pc101" (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us" (**) XKB: layout: "us" (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) FontPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/us r/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,/usr/ X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" (--) using VT number 7 (WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such file or directory) (II) Module ABI versions: XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1 XFree86 Video Driver: 0.5 XFree86 XInput driver : 0.3 XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1 XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.3 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.2.1.1, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.3 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.2.1.1, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 108e,a000 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 108e,5000 card , rev 13 class 06,04,00 hdr 81 (II) PCI: 00:01:1: chip 108e,5000 card , rev 13 class 06,04,00 hdr 81 (II) PCI: 01:01:0: chip 108e,1000 card , rev 01 class 06,80,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 01:01:1: chip 108e,1001 card , rev 01 class 02,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 01:02:0: chip 1002,4750 card , rev 5c class 03,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 01:03:0: chip 1095,0646 card 1095,0646 rev 03 class 01,01,8f hdr 00 (II) PCI: End of PCI scan (II) LoadModule: "scanpci" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a (II) Module scanpci: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.2.1.1, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 (II) UnloadModule: "scanpci" (II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (-1,0,0), BCTRL: 0x08 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 0 I/O range: [0] -1 00x - 0x00ff (0x100) IX[B] (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 00x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 00x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 2: bridge is at (0:1:0), (0,2,255), BCTRL: 0x23 (VGA_EN is cleared) (II) Bus 2 I/O range: [0] -1 00x - 0x001f (0x20) IX[B] [1] -1 00x0020 - 0x003f (0x20) IX[B] [2] -1 00x0040 - 0x005f (0x20) IX[B] [3] -1 00x0060 - 0x007f (0x20) IX[B] [4] -1 00x0080 - 0x009f (0x20) IX[B] [5] -1 00x00a0 - 0x00bf (0x20
Re: U5/10 and IDE drives larger than 20GB
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 12:40:56AM +0200, Nathanael Camelot wrote: > Hi, > > Did anyone try and succed to put a >20GB IDE hard drive in an Ultra > 5/10 running woody ? > The actual (or somehow former) 20GB said goodbye, and 20 gigs drives > are now quite overpriced, so if I can use a bigger-for-less one... > > Thanks in advance, sorry if it's a bit off topic. > > -- > Nathanael Camelot > mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yup. I've got a 120GB drive running fine in my Ultra 10. Only difference is that I'm running sid, and not woody. -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE- Version: 3.12 GCS/MU d- s+:- a-- C>$ UL+++ P L+++> !E W+++ N++ K? W--- M-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++(+++) t+ 5+ X+ R(+) tv b++(+++) DI++ D++(+++) G(++) e* h* r++>+++ y? --END GEEK CODE-- finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import pgpIGCPdKQR4k.pgp Description: PGP signature
U5/10 and IDE drives larger than 20GB
Hi, Did anyone try and succed to put a >20GB IDE hard drive in an Ultra 5/10 running woody ? The actual (or somehow former) 20GB said goodbye, and 20 gigs drives are now quite overpriced, so if I can use a bigger-for-less one... Thanks in advance, sorry if it's a bit off topic. -- Nathanael Camelot mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ultra 5 won't boot from HD after install
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 07:47:09PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > Are you sure that you have the disk setup as Master, and not cable > select or something else weird. > Yup, entirely. I found another IDE disk (6x the capacity!) and it works fine. I don't know what was wrong before. I know the disk was jumpered properly. It was a weird ancient disk, so who knows. Now, one more question, to which I should know the answer by now: When compiling the kernel in a default woody installation on this system, the build fails because there is no sparc64-linux-gcc on the system. I've worked around that problem in the past by making that a symlink to gcc-3.0. What's the actual right thing to do? noah -- ___ | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html pgpy9Uahj24LO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: XFree on Ultra10
Le ven 02/05/2003 à 22:49, Ben Collins a écrit : > > > > > > Is like what? > > Due to my bad english (i'm french) ... > > > > Do you see "dri" in that list anywhere? > > > > > No line with dri in Section Module > > Sorry. Basically, I just want you to add the Load "dri" line in there > and see if it helps you. > I put the line Load "dri" in the /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 and got an error, see bellow extracts of /var/log/XFree.0.log : --- ... (II) LoadModule: "vbe" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libvbe.a (II) Module vbe: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 (II) LoadModule: "xie" (WW) Warning, couldn't open module xie (II) UnloadModule: "xie" (EE) Failed to load module "xie" (module does not exist, 0) (II) LoadModule: "dri" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.a (II) Module dri: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1 (II) Loading sub module "drm" (II) LoadModule: "drm" ... (II) Reloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.a (II) UnloadModule: "dri" (EE) SUNFFB: Failed to load module "dri" (once-only module, 0) (II) UnloadModule: "sunffb" ... (II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libmfb.a (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. Fatal server error: no screens found --- I think i have found why XFree was so slow : My locale is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and require font iso-8859-15 I run an : apt-get install 'xfonts.*transcoded' And the XFree seems now Ok. Thanks for your help Marc
Re: sound and keyboard issues woody on ultra 10
Robert Zakaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a Swedish keyboard so I choosed fi for keyboard > language during installation If Finnish is available but not Swedish, you might report a bug. It looks as though `se' should work instead of `fi', at least in Woody. > any idea where to check the keyboard configuration for > the console and apply it in X? If necessary install `xkeycaps'. Then you can generate a file to use with xmodmap to modify the layout. It knows about type5 Swedish. (Previously you could put the result in ~/.xmodmap-$HOSTNAME to be picked up when the server started, but that no longer works.)
RE: StorEdge A1000
Addition to Ben's comment: as you may already know, the configuration utility you will need under Solaris is RAID Manager (it has an executable binary called rm6 installed under /usr/lib/osa/bin). This is an optional package that you can download from Sun's web site. After configuring the array with RM6, the created LUNs will register to the bus as regular drives. No special drivers needed to see them. Cheers Raoul Volpe Phone (877) 44 SOL EX (Toll Free) Phone +001 407 396-1341 (outside US) Fax +001 586 816 7086 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.solarisexpert.com -Original Message- From: Ben Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 11:51 AM To: Adrian Zaugg Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: StorEdge A1000 On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 05:34:01PM +0200, Adrian Zaugg wrote: > Dear List > > Does someone know how to manage the HW Array of the StoreEdge A1000 > under Debian? > > Thank you for your answer! > > Regards, Adrian Zaugg. You'll have to boot into Solaris to setup the A1000. It works perfectly well on Linux after that. auric.debian.org has an A1000 attached to it. We have a small solaris partition just to manage the array, which is never used. It's only there for disaster recovery (parity checks, disabling failed drive, enabling hotswap replacement). -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: StorEdge A1000
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 05:34:01PM +0200, Adrian Zaugg wrote: > Dear List > > Does someone know how to manage the HW Array of the StoreEdge A1000 > under Debian? > > Thank you for your answer! > > Regards, Adrian Zaugg. You'll have to boot into Solaris to setup the A1000. It works perfectly well on Linux after that. auric.debian.org has an A1000 attached to it. We have a small solaris partition just to manage the array, which is never used. It's only there for disaster recovery (parity checks, disabling failed drive, enabling hotswap replacement). -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
StorEdge A1000
Dear List Does someone know how to manage the HW Array of the StoreEdge A1000 under Debian? Thank you for your answer! Regards, Adrian Zaugg. PS: I'm not on the list, please reply CC'd.
Re: PS/2 mouse on Sparc Classic
> I would like to connect a regular PS/2 mouse to Sparc > Classic instead of broken one which was made by SUN. > As I understood, it shouldn't be a problem from the > signalling point of view, I have just change the mouse > connector. Have been discussing this with a hardware hacker associate of mine. This isn't quite as easy as it sounds. There are commercially avaliable boxes that will do SUN <-> PS/2 and that may be you best bet as I believe they also convert the protocol. > Then I am planning to run Debian instalation on the > same machine. > The question is - will Debian understand the new mouse > protocol (I am pretty sure that Solaris will not)? Yes if it has drivers for it - X may have been compiled without them. > Should I expect any problem with this installation? Your mouse may not work - I suspect this will take a while to get working. I guess the worst that will happen is that your machine will simply refuse to recognise the keyboard at all and you'll have to install via Serial. > Should I use a particular mouse for the replacement ? A Sun one? This is a genuine question - why does it need to be a PS/2 mouse? You can get Sun keyboards / mice very cheaply on eBay and that will not only probabily be cheaper but less hassel than trying to wire up a PS/2. If you are intent on it then go for as generic a mouse as possible IMHO - if you start having to play with the Microsoft or Logictec protocol extensions as well things are going to start getting very complicated. HTH Sweet Dreams, - Martin -- Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Seasons change, things come to pass"
PS/2 mouse on Sparc Classic
I would like to connect a regular PS/2 mouse to Sparc Classic instead of broken one which was made by SUN. As I understood, it shouldn't be a problem from the signalling point of view, I have just change the mouse connector. Then I am planning to run Debian instalation on the same machine. The question is - will Debian understand the new mouse protocol (I am pretty sure that Solaris will not)? Should I expect any problem with this installation? Should I use a particular mouse for the replacement ? Thanks __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com
