Re: Debian 3.0 on Netra X1, installs but won't run

2003-06-12 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:55:24PM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
 Nope, it's not a Sparc thing, it's an IDE thing.  Maybe it depends on 
 the motherboard, but just last week I was building a OpenBSD box out of 
 spare parts that wouldn't boot because the CD on the second IDE was 
 jumpered as a master.

It's not an IDE thing, it's a CDROM thing.  Some just don't want to be
masters.  I don't know why they even have jumpers.  Others are OK being
masters.  I think most recent drives can handle being masters, but I
could be wrong.  In my experience it's pretty much a toss-up whether a
given drive will work when jumpered as master.

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgpjtqdYd24dZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: sparc64 and ipsec

2003-05-29 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:33:31PM +0200, Andreas Pettersson wrote:
 I've been planning to test ipsec on my Ultra 1.
 But it seems that the FreeS/WAN kernel patches for 2.4.x won't compile on
 sparc64 and 2.5.69 was horribly unstable.
 So my question now is if there is any other way of getting ipsec for the
 sparc64 platform?

There is a backport of the IPsec implementation from 2.5 to 2.4.  See
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/davem/IPSEC/linux-2.4.21-ipsec.patch

It's totally unsupported, but might work for you.

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgpZunpR1sKbG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb

2003-05-09 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Peter Keel wrote:
 ping6 on an IPv6-enabled Sparc32 or Sparc64 on Kernel 2.4.20 
 bombs really nasty. Machine halts instantly. No matter what patches.

You're using ping6 from iputils-ping?  I maintain that package, and use
it on a number of sparc systems.  I do quite a bit of IPv6 stuff on
these machines, using one as a tunnel gateway and another as a
dual-stack web server.  Never have I seen any crashes related to IPv6 or
ICMPv6 or ping6 or any related code.

If you want, I can send you an image of one of the kernels that I use on
my Ultra1s.  I *know* they do IPv6.  It would be interesting to see if
they have problems on your machines.

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgpaX9vyxdwKy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Ultra 5 won't boot from HD after install

2003-05-05 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 07:47:09PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
 Are you sure that you have the disk setup as Master, and not cable
 select or something else weird.
 

Yup, entirely.

I found another IDE disk (6x the capacity!) and it works fine.  I don't
know what was wrong before.  I know the disk was jumpered properly.  It
was a weird ancient disk, so who knows.

Now, one more question, to which I should know the answer by now:  When
compiling the kernel in a default woody installation on this system, the
build fails because there is no sparc64-linux-gcc on the system.  I've
worked around that problem in the past by making that a symlink to
gcc-3.0.  What's the actual right thing to do?

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgpy9Uahj24LO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Ultra 5 won't boot from HD after install

2003-05-02 Thread Noah Meyerhans
Hi all.  I just installed potato on an Ultra 5 (will upgrade once it's
working, but that's all I had on CD) but the machine doesn't seem to
want to boot from the IDE hard drive.  It had no problem booting the
install CD and the installation seemed to go fine.  No errors were
reported when installing SILO.

Here's the output of my interaction with OpenBoot:
ok boot disk
Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],0  File and args:

Can't open boot device

The partition table has a Linux partition first, occupying most of the
disk, followed by swap.  The 3rd partition is the entire disk in the
Sun disklable.

The disk in the machine is not the original Sun-supplied disk but is an
old 1.2 gig IDE disk.  The manual with hardware detected defaults
option when creating a sun disklabel in fdisk seemed to pick the right
values, according to the label on the disk, and as I said, there was no
sign of problems during the installation of the system or of SILO.

Any suggestions?

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgpgsd6UTA0jh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Ultra 5 won't boot from HD after install

2003-05-02 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 03:09:04PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
 I'm only guessing but OBP doesn't seem to detect the device, atleast not
 at the OBP address that the disk alias points to.
 
 Try doing boot disk1 or boot disk2, boot disk3...

That didn't work.

show-devs reveals, among a bunch of other non-disk things, a disk at
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/disk, which is the 
device that disk seems to be
pointing to (how do I view device aliases?).

I don't suppose there's some IDE equivalent to probe-scsi-all that I
need to run, or something like that, is there?

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgphyYnflY4uL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Ultra 5 won't boot from HD after install

2003-05-02 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 04:13:56PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
 Boot back to the install and switch to a the shell console (ALT+F2) and
 use dmesg | more to see if you can find some info about your IDE. I
 have an Ultra5 here working perfectly with a non-stock IDE drive, so I
 know it works.

Here's the boottime output when initializing the IDE busses:
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
CMD646: IDE controller on PCI bus 01 dev 18
CMD646: chipset revision 3
CMD646: chipset revision 0x03, MultiWord DMA Force Limited
CMD646: 100% native mode on irq 4,7e0
ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1fe02c00020-0x1fe02c00027, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
ide1: BM-DMA at 0x1fe02c00028-0x1fe02c0002f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
hda: Conner Peripherals 1275MB - CFS1276A, ATA DISK drive
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
hdc: CRD-8322B, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide0 at 0x1fe02c0-0x1fe02c7,0x1fe02ca on irq 4,7e0
ide1 at 0x1fe02c00010-0x1fe02c00017,0x1fe02c0001a on irq 4,7e0 (shared with ide)
hda: 2502308 sectors (1281 MB), CHS=2482/16/63, DMA
hdc: ATAPI 32X CD-ROM drive, 128kB Cache
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.12
Partition check:
 hda: hda1 hda2 hda3

The partition table looks like:
Disk /dev/hda (Sun disk label): 16 heads, 63 sectors, 2480 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes

   Device FlagStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1 0  2379   1199016   83  Linux native
/dev/hda2  u   2379  2480 50904   82  Linux swap
/dev/hda3 0  2480   12499205  Whole disk


noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgp5fZaEbU0jD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Ultra 5 won't boot from HD after install

2003-05-02 Thread Noah Meyerhans
I have set up a tftp environment from which I can boot the installation
system on this machine.  What do I need to do to tftp a kernel to this
machine and boot it?  I obviously can't just send a kernel image to the
machine (I tried).  I can boot the tftpboot.img file with no troubles,
but of course that kicks me into the system installer.  I just want to
boot the actual installed system via tftp.

I've found the silotftp.b bootloader and used tftp to get it running,
but it can't seem to access the disk, either.  So it really seems like
I'll need to download the whole kernel.

Of course, even if I manage to do this, who knows if the machine will be
stable or not.  I'm starting to think there might be something wrong
with the PCI bus or the IDE controller.

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgpkDyNYncWZM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Mail Server?

2002-06-18 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 06:43:33PM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
 I don't  think exim's good  for an  ISP. It could  be useful for  a home
 computer but nothing more. I don't like qmail.
 

I'm surprised to hear you say that about exim.  You realize that it was
written to handle mail for a rather large site, right?  See
http://www.exim.org/FAQ.html#TOC188 for some testimonials from other
large sites that use it.

I won't comment on qmail or those involved in its development.  I
suspect I don't need to comment on things like sendmail.

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgpQrFANOXU6i.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: kernel 2.4.x compile failure on Ultra 1

2001-09-12 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 03:47:20AM +0200, Ben Castricum wrote:
 I think a came across this problem as well. Try compiling the kernel with
 SMP, i think the atomic_dec_and_lock only gets exported when SMP is being
 used. Unfortunately I run accross more problems later on when trying to
 compile 2.4.9, hopefully you have more luck.

Yup, that did it.  It also turned out that I needed to enable PCI
support, despite the fact that the Ultra1 is an SBus machine.  But all
seems to be well now.

Thanks.
noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgpZMOfwVw4Nw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: SPARC 20 firmware error at boot

2001-08-27 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 12:14:52PM +0800, Jean-Paul Blaquiere wrote:
 what's probably happened is the internal battery has died.  It is a trivial
 matter to attach a new lithium/NiCad battery to the top of your CMOS chip
 after disconnecting the old one.  All you need is a soldering iron and a
 small hacksaw :)

I ended up pulling an NVRAM chip from an unused SPARC 10.  According to
the SPARC FAQ the SS10 and 20 used the same chip.  Lo and behold, my
SS20 is now happily working again.  Yay!

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 


pgpOOYjueOjVa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: SPARC 20 firmware error at boot

2001-08-24 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 12:57:59PM +0800, Jean-Paul Blaquiere wrote:
 google is your friend.
 or the copy I keep at home ;)
 http://japester.ucc.asn.au/faqsunnvram.txt

Thanks!  Now I only need to determine whether or not it's worth it to me
to buy a replacement NVRAM chip...  ;^)

noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html