Re: ssh pause on ultra 2

2003-12-22 Thread Rob Radez
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:33:39AM -0600, JJ Streicher-Bremer wrote:
 I have woody installed on my ultra2 and have had this problem from the 
 beginning.  When I'm sshing to my system my clients (every one I have 
 tried) pauses for approx 15 sec before coming back with a prompt (or 
 connecting in the case of key-based auth).  I do have forward _and_ 
 reverse name lookups working on this host.  I even tried compiling my 
 own openssh with the same problem.  When I run sshd in debug mode this 
 is what I get.
...
 This is one of the last little niggles I have with my install of debian 
 (now that I have RAID1 working) and I'd love to figure out what is going 
 on.  When I tried gentoo on this host, there was no pause at all 
 connecting via ssh so I don't think it's hardware.

If you're using testing or unstable, add /usr/lib/v9/ to /etc/ld.so.conf
and run ldconfig and /etc/init.d/ssh restart.

(for sun4m people, add /usr/lib/v8/ and run the same commands)

Regards,
Rob Radez



Re: kernel-package sparc confusion

2003-11-12 Thread Rob Radez
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:49:59PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
   OK. This is going into the new version.

I'm not sure what's in 8.069, but the attached patch against 8.068 adds
back in setting KPKG_SUBARCH if it's not set, and also sets KERNEL_ARCH
properly (without an extra endif).

Regards,
Rob Radez

--- kernel-package-8.068/kernel/rules.orig  2003-11-12 10:11:40.0 
-0500
+++ kernel-package-8.068/kernel/rules   2003-11-12 10:11:46.0 -0500
@@ -355,15 +355,22 @@
 DEBCONFIG = $(CONFDIR)/config.sparc
 ARCH_IN_NAME = YES
 
-  ifneq (,$(filter sparc64%,$(KPKG_SUBARCH)))
-KERNEL_ARCH = sparc64
-  else
-ifneq (,$(filter sparc%,$(KPKG_SUBARCH)))
-  KERNEL_ARCH = sparc
-else
-  KERNEL_ARCH = $(strip $(shell uname -m))
-endif
-  endif
+ifeq (,$(KPKG_SUBARCH))
+ ifeq (sparc64,$(strip $(shell uname -m)))
+  KPKG_SUBARCH = sparc64
+ else
+  KPKG_SUBARCH = sparc32
+ endif
+endif
+
+ifneq (,$(filter sparc64%,$(KPKG_SUBARCH)))
+ KERNEL_ARCH = sparc64
+else
+ ifneq (,$(filter sparc%,$(KPKG_SUBARCH)))
+  KERNEL_ARCH = sparc
+ else
+  KERNEL_ARCH = $(strip $(shell uname -m))
+ endif
 endif
 
 ifneq ($(shell if [ $(VERSION) -ge 2 -a $(PATCHLEVEL) -ge 5 -a  \



Re: kernel-package sparc confusion

2003-11-01 Thread Rob Radez
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 01:53:48PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
 The logic I wanted was, if KPKG_SUBARCH is set, leave it. If it is
 unset, set it according to uname -m (that is sparc32 for uname ==
 sparc and sparc64 for uname == sparc64).

In my limited amount of testing, the attached patch seems to be doing the
right thing on sparc32 and sparc64.  By limited, I mean I've tried not
setting subarch, setting it to foo, sparc64-foo, sparc64, sparc32-foo,
and sparc32.  It's a simple patch; it just breaks up setting
KPKG_SUBARCH, if necessary, into a separate operation than setting
KERNEL_ARCH.  Ben, if you wouldn't mind testing to make sure it doesn't
break anything for you, I would really appreciate it.

Regards,
Rob Radez

(patch is against /usr/share/kernel-package/rules, kernel-package 8.066)
--- rules.orig  2003-11-01 10:34:51.0 -0500
+++ rules   2003-11-01 10:42:02.0 -0500
@@ -348,19 +348,31 @@
 DEBCONFIG = $(CONFDIR)/config.sparc
 ARCH_IN_NAME = YES
 
+ifeq (,$(KPKG_SUBARCH))
+ TMP = $(strip $(shell uname -m))
+ ifeq (sparc64,$(TMP))
+  KPKG_SUBARCH = sparc64
+ else
+  KPKG_SUBARCH = sparc32
+ endif
+endif
+
 ifneq (,$(filter sparc64%,$(KPKG_SUBARCH)))
-KERNEL_ARCH = sparc64
+ KERNEL_ARCH = sparc64
 else
-  ifeq ($(KPKG_SUBARCH),sparc64)
-  KERNEL_ARCH = sparc64
+ ifeq ($(KPKG_SUBARCH),sparc64)
+ KERNEL_ARCH = sparc64
+ else
+  ifneq (,$(filter sparc32%,$(KPKG_SUBARCH)))
+   KERNEL_ARCH = sparc
   else
+   ifeq ($(KPKG_SUBARCH),sparc32)
+KERNEL_ARCH = sparc
+   else
 KERNEL_ARCH = $(strip $(shell uname -m))
-ifneq (,$(filter sparc%,$(KPKG_SUBARCH)))
-  KERNEL_ARCH = sparc
-else
-  KPKG_SUBARCH = sparc64
-endif
+   endif
   endif
+ endif
 endif
 
 ifneq ($(shell if [ $(VERSION) -ge 2 -a $(PATCHLEVEL) -ge 5 -a  \



Re: kernel-package sparc confusion

2003-10-07 Thread Rob Radez
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 01:53:48PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
 The logic I wanted was, if KPKG_SUBARCH is set, leave it. If it is
 unset, set it according to uname -m (that is sparc32 for uname ==
 sparc and sparc64 for uname == sparc64).

Unfortunately, it's not doing that right now.  With KPKG_SUBARCH unset
by me, it's getting set to sparc64 by kernel-package on my sparc32
machines.  I'll look into a proper patch soon if no one else does.

Regards,
Rob Radez



Re: Ethernet lockup

2003-06-06 Thread Rob Radez
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:31:37PM +0200, David List wrote:
 As far as I remember, if you use make-kpkg to build a new kernel
 package, it does the right thing.  (See the Debian FAQ.)
 
 Just to make sure I understand the man page right:
 If I issue 'make-kpkg kernel_image' the kernel is built *and* installed
 *and* any symlinks are set correctly.
 
 Is this correct?

No.  http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-kernel.en.html#s-customkernel
gives a short overview of using make-kpkg.  You have to install the
kernel package separately using dpkg.

Regards,
Rob Radez



2.4.21-rc7 sparc32 kernel debs

2003-06-05 Thread Rob Radez
Hopefully people don't mind my plugging my sparc32 kernel debs again.
2.4.21-rc7 debs have been posted; UP has been tested on an ss5, SMP on
an SS10.  I'm uploading them now to http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/
and they're almost all up there.

Now back to your regularly scheduled mailings,
Rob Radez



2.4.21-rc1 sparc32 kernel debs

2003-04-24 Thread Rob Radez
2.4.21-rc1 sparc32 kernel debs are up at
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/ for downloading.  UP boots on my ss5,
haven't tried booting the SMP image.

Regards,
Rob Radez



2.4.21-pre7 sparc32 kernel debs

2003-04-06 Thread Rob Radez
Howdy,
I've uploaded kernel debs for 2.4.21-pre7 to
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/ for those who want them.  The UP image
boots on my ss5/110, other booting status for UP and SMP is unknown.
Your mileage might vary.

Regards,
Rob Radez



2.4.21-pre6 sparc32 kernel debs

2003-03-29 Thread Rob Radez
Well, spring break is over so I got around to packaging up a set of
2.4.21-pre6 kernel debs for sparc32.  I've uploaded them to
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/ for your downloading pleasure.  The UP
image boots fine for me but I haven't tested out the SMP image.  As
always, your mileage may (and probably will) vary.

Regards,
Rob Radez



Re: 2.4.20 compilation failure

2003-03-12 Thread Rob Radez
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:34:58PM +, Taras Ciuriak wrote:
 http://osinvestor.com/sparc/
 
 Thanks Warwick.  The kmap problem mentioned there applies to Stable 
 series - 2.4.21-pre5.  Funnily enough, it says for Stable series - 2.4.20;
 
 2.4.20 compiles and works on sun4m, UP and SMP. Sun4d doesn't work, 
 sun4c *ought* to work, and there are a bunch of other smaller bugs for 
 sun4m. And yes, dbri isn't working that well.
 
 So it says it should compile.  Grumble.../Taras

2.4.20 compiles fine for me, but I can't and haven't tested every
.config.  If you send me yours offlist I can try to find where it's failing.

Regards,
Rob Radez



sparc32 2.4.21-pre5 kernel debs

2003-03-02 Thread Rob Radez
I'm currently uploading 2.4.21-pre5 kernel debs for sparc32, UP and SMP,
to http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/ that will hopefully boot this time
on SMP.  If they're still too big I'll try to modularize more stuff, in
which case more people will likely need an initrd.  pre5 UP boots fine
here, with a patch that I mailed off to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I
make no promises on machines out of my control though.

Regards,
Rob Radez



Sparc32 2.4.21-pre4 kernel debs

2003-01-29 Thread Rob Radez
Good evening,
I just uploaded a set of 2.4.21-pre4 sparc32 kernel debs for UP and SMP to
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/ for your enjoyment.  A couple changes
that I made: ext3 is now compiled in instead of modular, and I finally
got around to enabling the NFS root config options.  UP kernel image
boots fine here, but as usual, your mileage might vary.

Merry SPARCing,
Rob Radez

P.S. Note: Sparc32, NOT Sparc64.



sparc32 2.4.21-pre3 kernel debs

2003-01-09 Thread Rob Radez
I just posted 2.4.21-pre3 UP and SMP kernel debs for sparc32 to
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/ but as per my usual practice have only
booted the UP ones on my sun4m machines.  These work for me but might
not for you.

Regards,
Rob Radez



sparc32 2.4.21-pre2 kernel debs

2003-01-03 Thread Rob Radez
Happy 2003.  I just uploaded 2.4.21-pre2 sparc32 kernel debs to
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/ and joy of joys I actually managed to
boot them on sun4c and both UP and SMP sun4m.  Standard cover-my-ass
disclaimer, these debs work for me, they might not for you and there are
no guarantees (except death and taxes).

Regards,
Rob Radez



Re: unofficial 2.4.21-pre1 sparc32 kernel debs

2002-12-13 Thread Rob Radez
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:16:00AM +0100, Christian J?nsson wrote:
 On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:18:43PM -0500, Rob Radez wrote:
  Unofficial 2.4.21-pre1 sparc32 kernel debs have been uploaded to
  http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/ .  Running UP here, but I can make no
  guarantees.  Also, does anyone even care about this now that official
  debian 2.4 sparc debs are available?
 
 I must have missed that, where is that official site?

Oops, apparently only the .changes file is available (in
ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/proposed-updates/).  I guess I'll just keep
making debs until the official ones are available.  I'll most likely
stop (since I don't actually use every kernel revision on my personal
machines) unless people want me to continue.

Regards,
Rob Radez



unofficial 2.4.21-pre1 sparc32 kernel debs

2002-12-11 Thread Rob Radez
Unofficial 2.4.21-pre1 sparc32 kernel debs have been uploaded to
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs/ .  Running UP here, but I can make no
guarantees.  Also, does anyone even care about this now that official
debian 2.4 sparc debs are available?

Regards,
Rob Radez



Re: SS20 2.4 SMP, irregular boot freezes and swapon segfaults

2002-12-03 Thread Rob Radez
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:46:01PM -0600, Nicolas WILL wrote:
 On my SS20 I compiled a 2.4.18 kernel with SMP support. I discovered that
 the machine would boot beyond the simple kernel startup only once every 5 to
 10 trys.
 
 I then tried 2.4.19, then this week-end 2.4.20. Same problem. I used either
 the kernel-source stable packages or direct source tarballs from kernel.org
 with the same result.
 
 No such problem on my ss5.
 
 Any well know issue on that?

It sounds like some people are running into problems like this.
Personally, I didn't have any trouble with my SMP SS10 back in August
when I was at home able to test out 2.4 on it.  Some people seem to be
running SMP fine on their SS10s and SS20s.

 Another problem I have is with swapon under 2.4 kernel. It segfaults... swap
 looks finely there as far as I know though.
 
 swapoff seems fine and happy. swapon segfaults During startup or manual
 command.
 
 Any known issue on that?

Known problem, but there are higher priority things to be fixed.  The
swap still gets activated, so it's not that big of a deal.

Regards,
Rob Radez



Re: SS20 2.4 SMP, irregular boot freezes and swapon segfaults

2002-12-03 Thread Rob Radez
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:38:51PM -0600, Nicolas WILL wrote:
 Any fix they applied or it is still unknown?

No, no fix for it yet.  I don't think the cause is known yet either.

 I would tend to discard hardware issues: I have no such problem in
 Uniprocessor, so it should not be a memory problem. I swapped the CPU's in
 their slots, and have the same problem in SMP, same great working system in
 UP.

I wouldn't discount memory if it's an intermittent ability to boot.  But
then, I don't know anything at all about why it's happening.

  Personally, I didn't have any trouble with my SMP SS10 back in August
  when I was at home able to test out 2.4 on it.  Some people seem to be
  running SMP fine on their SS10s and SS20s.
 
 
 hmm... interesting... Could this be an OpenPROM version issue? I have the
 2.25R, needed by my 2 Ross CPU's.

I'll have to take a look at my prom version next time I go home in a
couple weeks.

 Is there any list of know problems? or FAQ?

There's uzi's faq at http://sparclinux.net/ plus I'm trying to put
together a sparc32 kernel status page at http://osinvestor.com/sparc/
(where I also have kernel debs).

Regards,
Rob Radez



2.4.20 sparc32 kernel debs

2002-11-30 Thread Rob Radez
So I kept on getting halfway through making kernel debs when a new
version would be released, and work piled up, and life happened.
Anyways, I'm uploading kernel debs for 2.4.20 sparc32 to
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/ right now.  As usual, I'm running the UP
image here myself, I don't have my SMP SS10 to test on, but everything
seems alright so far.  Your mileage might vary, I can't make any
guarantees, but if something breaks, please e-mail me.  Since this is
not a -pre/-rc patch release, I'm finally taking the 2.4.19 debs off of
my website.  Unless of course, somebody wants to offer me enough web
space that I can keep old versions up indefinitely :-).

Regards,
Rob Radez



2.4.20-rc2 sparc32 kernel debs

2002-11-19 Thread Rob Radez
It's that time of the week again.  I'm uploading 2.4.20-rc2 sparc32
kernel debs for UP and SMP to http://osinvestor.com/sparc/ as I type
this.  Blah blah, no guarantees, blah blah, I'm very busy with
schoolwork and probably won't be able to look very deeply into problems,
blah blah, it works here, your mileage may vary.

Regards,
Rob Radez



Re: official 2.4 debs for sun4cdm (was: Re: kernel 2.4.x on sun4c)

2002-10-23 Thread Rob Radez
My opinion is that Ben knows a lot more about this stuff than I do, plus he's
the one that would end up having to support it.  I personally think of 2.4
on sparc32 as experimental.  sun4d is completely broken, sun4c breaks at
whim, and sun4m has a bunch of smaller problems.  The only reason I put up
my debs is because they're what I use personally, that I don't guarantee
anything by putting them up, and that the userbase is so much smaller than
Debian's that I don't need to worry about getting 20 e-mails a day about
swapon being broken on SMP.

Regards,
Rob Radez



2.4.20-pre11 sparc32 kernel debs

2002-10-17 Thread Rob Radez
Subject says (almost) all.  Just uploaded 2.4.20-pre11 debs for sparc32 to
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/ .  I'm contemplating making 2.5.x debs for
sparc32 (and if I can get it working, sparc64) if there's any interest for
them.  Once again, these debs Work Here, but might not work for you.  Please
e-mail me with any comments or suggestions.

Regards,
Rob Radez



sparc32 2.4.20-pre10 kernel debs

2002-10-11 Thread Rob Radez
It's that time of the night again.  I've just built and posted 2.4.20-pre10
kernel debs for sparc32 (sun4cdm although sun4d probably doesn't work) at
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/ . I'm using the UP image on my own sun4m systems
but I can't make any guarantees for other people's hardware.

Comments, criticsm, and suggestions always welcomed.

Regards,
Rob Radez



2.4.20-pre8 kernel debs

2002-09-26 Thread Rob Radez
I'm uploading 2.4.20-pre8 kernel debs to http://osinvestor.com/sparc/ now.
Once again, these are for sparc32, not sparc64, and I've only tested the UP
image on one of my systems.  On yours, it might just decide to drink a beer
and call it quits for the day.  YMMV.  Oh yeah, the debs should also be up on
http://sparclinux.mit.edu/sparc/ momentarily too.

Regards,
Rob Radez



smp kernel debs

2002-09-20 Thread Rob Radez
Ok, I just uploaded smp 2.4.20-pre7 kernel debs to http://osinvestor.com/sparc

Note that I haven't tested the smp image since my smp ss10 is at home.

Regards,
Rob Radez



kernel debs rise again

2002-09-19 Thread Rob Radez
I've uploaded 2.4.20-pre7 UP debs to http://osinvestor.com/sparc/ now that my
webserver is back up.  SMP is still building since I didn't really have a
pressing need for it and left it til now.  The UP kernel works on two ss4's
that I brought with me, with a small nit-patch that I mailed off to the
iptables maintainer.  Once again, they work here, but YMMV.  Comments,
criticsm, requests, feel free to e-mail me.

Regards,
Rob Radez



Re: Sparc linux kernel 2.5

2002-08-27 Thread Rob Radez
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:26:09PM +0200, Christian J?nsson wrote:
 What about the 2.5.x kernels for sun4m? Anyone got some working?
 
 Cheers,
 
 /ChJ
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Joshua Uziel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Uziel
 Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:39 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
 Subject: Re: Sparc linux kernel 2.5
 
 
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020827 03:49]:
  I am looking for a 2.5 kernel for a sparc4c. I tried 2 linus trees (18
 
  and 31) but they didn't compile at all. I checked the kernel source 
  finder and vger.rutgers.edu and vger.samba.org without success. Any 
  ideas how I can get a working 2.5 kernel tree are welcome.
 
 At the moment, you can't.  The closest thing there is to it is a
 bitkeeper tree at http://linux-wli.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5-sparc32
 that Pete Zaitcev has been putting a ton of work into.
 
 The latest known working kernel for sun4c is 2.4.19 (and probably the
 2.4.20-pre ones).

sun4m and sun4c are both sparc32, and sparc32 as a whole is not working in
2.5.  And actually, unless I've missed something, the latest known working
kernel for sun4c is 2.4.19, and the latest known working for sun4m is
2.4.20-pre1.

Regards,
Rob Radez



Re: How to install a new kernel?

2002-08-14 Thread Rob Radez
With all these people suggesting kernel-package, I thought I'd just plug my own
kernel packages, available at http://osinvestor.com/sparc/ .  They're only for
sparc32 at this point, but I'm at LinuxWorld right now without access to most
of my home machines.  When I get back home, I'll make and upload a 2.4.20-pre2
set of packages, and remake 2.4.19 with a couple CONFIG_ options turned on that
people requested.

Regards,
Rob Radez



Re: 2.4.19-ac1 kernel compilation

2002-08-04 Thread Rob Radez
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 12:14:35PM +0200, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote:
 Good. After this problem I found some other problems in
 arch/sparc/kernel/process.c. I fixed them by reverting to .19 instead of
 .19-ac1. Looks like Alan doesn't care too much about Sparc. :-(
 
 What's the best kernel for sun4m/sparc5 machines exactly? I'm told I
 should be running 2.4, but I'm not quite sure about that anymore...

2.4.19 is the best 2.4 kernel for sparc32.  2.4-ac has the O(1) scheduler,
which Pete Zaitcev has been working on for sparc32 in 2.5.  There are still
some problems with 2.4 and sparc32, but I'm not sure how seriously they might
affect you.

Regards,
Rob Radez



2.4.19 kernel debs

2002-08-04 Thread Rob Radez
I'm uploading 2.4.19 kernel debs to http://osinvestor.com/sparc/ right now.
These are the kernel debs that I use for my own sparcs, but I can't make
any promises about them.

Regards,
Rob Radez



2.4.19-rc3 kernel debs

2002-07-26 Thread Rob Radez
I've actually had these available for a couple days, just forgot to post to
the list about them.  I've uploaded my kernel debs for 2.4.19-rc3 to
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/
This time I've included both UP and SMP kernels for your booting enjoyment.
Usual disclaimer applies; these kernels work for me and I use them on my own
network, but I make no guarantees other than your hair might fall out or
you might have a sudden aversion to beer.  YMMV.

Regards,
Rob Radez


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



2.4 kernel debs

2002-06-25 Thread Rob Radez
I'm in the process of uploading kernel debs for 2.4.19-rc1.  Same disclaimer
from last time applies.

New site this time though:
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/

Regards,
Rob Radez


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: linux-2.4.x on sparc32 systems

2002-06-13 Thread Rob Radez
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:22:31PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
 
 Nothing stops anyone from build a set of deb's for sparc32 2.4.x kernels
 and emailing the location to this list. Hey, I'd even welcome someone
 else taking on that responsibility, rather than hearing everyone
 complain about it.

Well, I haven't heard anything else from anyone about this, and I don't even
know how many people will care, but I've built a set of kernel debs.  Just a
disclaimer, I added no patches, just took a stock 2.4.19-pre10 tree and used
that, and my config might not be everything for everybody, and insert
standard covering-my-ass disclaimer it might crash your machine, eat your
disk, break your windows, or make all the food in your refrigerator go bad.

Also, this is my first time using kernel-package, so I've yet to tweak all
the little settings that the man page says you can.  Anyways, enough of what
they aren't; they are 2.4.19-pre10 and up at http://junker.org/~rradez/sparc/

Regards,
Rob Radez

PS: When you spot a bug, e-mail me before the list since these are completely
unofficial and not supported by debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: sun4 status

2002-05-28 Thread Rob Radez
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:55:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Bob,
 
 The old Sparc 2 4/75 here accepted 

Maybe I'm missing something, but he was asking about plain-jane sun4, not
sun4c which is what a sparcstation 2 is.  And no, I don't have a sun4
machine nor do I know about that port's status.

Regards,
Rob Radez


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: kernel 2.4.18 and 2.4.19 for sparc

2002-05-28 Thread Rob Radez
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 06:39:26PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
 Back when 2.4.18 came out, I heard there was a problem where a patch
 vital to Sparc didn't make it it.  At the time I wasn't worried about
 it since I didn't need to go to 2.4.18.  Now looking at changelogs
 for 2.4.19-pre1, I see mention of one change labeled SPARC64, but
 nothing for SPARC in general.  Does this mean that 2.4.18 works fine
 for Sparc 32?  Or did 2.4.19-pre1 not yet fix that problem?  Or was
 the change mislabeled?
 
 Is 2.4.19-pre9 now as stable for Sparc/Sparc64 as it is for x86?
 Is there a web page/site that gives Sparc specific information about
 the kernel?

I would have to say 2.4.19-pre9 is the stablest (is that a word? :-) stock
2.4 kernel available on the net for sparc32.  Of course, I suspect there are
some hacks floating around people's trees, but those'll get merged in
eventually.

Regards,
Rob Radez


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]