Re: dependency problem
after updating the list of available packages I have encountered the following dependency problem: dpkg pre-depends on libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 does not appear to be available and in fact I didn't find that package. I'm running potato with the following source list: deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib non-free deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates It's being fixed now. 1.6.15.1 will be installed today. Now I am running into another prob . After updating I have an unmet dependency regarding modutils which depends ob libc6 = 2.1.94. But there is no such version of libc6 ?!?! cheers, Steffan --- I am the ILOVEGNU signature virus. Just copy me to your signature. This email was infected under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
Re: dependency problem
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:21:21PM +0100, Steffan Baron wrote: after updating the list of available packages I have encountered the following dependency problem: dpkg pre-depends on libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 does not appear to be available and in fact I didn't find that package. I'm running potato with the following source list: deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib non-free deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates It's being fixed now. 1.6.15.1 will be installed today. Now I am running into another prob . After updating I have an unmet dependency regarding modutils which depends ob libc6 = 2.1.94. But there is no such version of libc6 ?!?! Wait for 1.6.15.2 -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
Re: dependency problem
Now I am running into another prob . After updating I have an unmet dependency regarding modutils which depends ob libc6 = 2.1.94. But there is no such version of libc6 ?!?! Wait for 1.6.15.2 Mmh, I'm running 1.6.15.2 . Steffan --- I am the ILOVEGNU signature virus. Just copy me to your signature. This email was infected under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
Re: dependency problem
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 03:02:07PM +0100, Steffan Baron wrote: Now I am running into another prob . After updating I have an unmet dependency regarding modutils which depends ob libc6 = 2.1.94. But there is no such version of libc6 ?!?! Wait for 1.6.15.2 Mmh, I'm running 1.6.15.2 . DOH, you mean modutils! :) Let me see if I can fix that. -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
dependency problem
Hi there, after updating the list of available packages I have encountered the following dependency problem: dpkg pre-depends on libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 does not appear to be available and in fact I didn't find that package. I'm running potato with the following source list: deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib non-free deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates Any ideas ?? cheers, Steffan --- I am the ILOVEGNU signature virus. Just copy me to your signature. This email was infected under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
Re: dependency problem
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 02:52:32PM +0100, Steffan Baron wrote: Hi there, after updating the list of available packages I have encountered the following dependency problem: dpkg pre-depends on libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 does not appear to be available and in fact I didn't find that package. I'm running potato with the following source list: deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib non-free deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates It's being fixed now. 1.6.15.1 will be installed today. -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
Re: Bug#69075: Forced upgrade to unstable gnome to fix a simple dependency problem?
MJR == Mikko J Rauhala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MJR While looking in the archives for the (obvious-seeming) dependency bug MJR that I encountered in Potato, I was rather surprised that the bug was MJR actually marked closed. Of course, I was rather surprised that the bug MJR is still around, also... MJR Anyway, seems to me that a simple dependency problem like this should be MJR corrected in Potato and not suggest upgrading to gnome packages from MJR Woody... It doesn't really seem like requiring anything else but a plain MJR old gnome-panel-data_1.0.55-2 package with an extra .0.1 added to the MJR end or a gnome-panel package with a fixed dependency for only MJR gnome-panel-data_1.0.55-2 MJR So, I hope to have this issue reopened and fixed. Currently Potato/SPARC MJR is pretty inconvenient to the Gnome desktop user, since gnome-panel and MJR therefore gnome-session don't want to install without forcing... Somebody in the sparc list can do a upload to fix this problem ? Christian
Re: Bug#44685: Dependency problem with LPRng (fwd)
G'day sparc people, This bug is for whoever does the sparc version of lprng, it is not a generic deb or upstream issue. - Forwarded message from Alexandre Vitrac - From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 10 16:30:05 1999 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on Solaris X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 08:29:30 +0200 (MET DST) Organization: CS SI Athesa Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Alexandre Vitrac [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Craig Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#44685: Dependency problem with LPRng Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sorted: Debian On 10-Sep-99 Craig Small wrote: Having a quick look at the packages on master and other sites, they all have the dependency of libncurses4 (with no version, as it should be). However, I did notice the sparc arch did have versioned dependencies, are you running a sparc? Yes I'm running a sparc version of Debian GNU/Linux. So there's probably no problem with the archive. How will the problem be solved ? Will there be a new upload of libncurses of a new upload of lprng ? Looking at the BTS I saw that libncurses was upgraded to 3.1 due to problems with glibc2.1 on version 3. And if I'm not mistaken, the sparc port is based on a pre-version of glibc2.1. This is probably why the sparc package for lprng places a dependency on this specific version. == Alexandre Vitrac CS SI ATHESA E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] == - End of forwarded message from Alexandre Vitrac - -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIEEE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dependency problem with apache_1.3.3-6
I installed apache from slink on Sunday, and the package apache_1.3.3-6 seems to require apache-common_1.3.4, rather than 1.3.3. It's easy to find -- but it's in potato, not in slink. It's probably just a typo which has slipped into the .deb, rather than an actual dependency on version 1.3.4. Perhaps someone else can check this, too.
Re: Dependency problem with apache_1.3.3-6
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 12:05:24PM -0800, John Chapman wrote: I installed apache from slink on Sunday, and the package apache_1.3.3-6 seems to require apache-common_1.3.4, rather than 1.3.3. It's easy to find -- but it's in potato, not in slink. It's probably just a typo which has slipped into the .deb, rather than an actual dependency on version 1.3.4. Perhaps someone else can check this, too. Jonnie Ingram uploaded a fixed version of that for i386, it was installed today, just needs to be compiled for sparc. -- Ben Collins - - --- - - - --- UnixGroup Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Developer GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenLDAP Core [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- - - - --- --- -- The Choice of the GNU Generation
