Re: setenv missing

1996-11-17 Thread Neil Walker
Thanks to all who responded, problem solved.
Some time ago I had a trouble with
with color-ls. I had put bash.rc's and bash_profile's
in /etc & /root csh.cshrc and so on 
A clear out and fresh start has worked wonders,

Thanks again ,
Neil

-- 
~~~+
Neil Walker (+44 626 853306) Learning Debian Linux |
~~~+




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: g77 failure

1996-11-17 Thread Hamish Moffatt
> > As I understand it, f77 wants gcc 2.7.2 and not gcc 2.7.2.1
> As a workaround I did now the following:
> 
> cd /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.1/
> ln -s ../2.7.2/libf2c.a .
> ln -s ../2.7.2/f771 .
> 
> I will now have to check wether it still works in all cases.
> Development team: Please consider if there shouldn't be a dependency
> between g77 and gcc versions, which shall be resolved by dselect.

That would stop you installing these two together at all.
A similar problem applies with GNAT Ada; it wants gcc 2.7.2, and in
fact replaces the gcc executable, so things don't go nicely
if you try to run gcc 2.7.2.1 + gnat 3.04 (well, 3.05 is out
but not in a package). I did mention this on the list a while
back and to the maintainer; I'm not sure what's being done
about resolving this, though.

GNAT supplies a new gcc binary because Ada support is disabled
in gcc 2.7.2's binary by default, and needs to be recompiled
with it enabled. Ideally, the GCC package will have gcc with
this enabled, and the GNAT package will not supply a gcc at
all. Hopefully this will happen for the next GNAT package version,
which is awaiting GNAT 3.06 (based on gcc 2.7.2.1).



hamish

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: dpkg problems

1996-11-17 Thread Andy Guy
Martin Konold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 
> > Hi there,
> > how to resolve
> > 
> > Odd number of elements in hash list at /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/ftp/install


This is a bug in dpkg-ftp shown up by the latest version of perl -
don't worry it is still doing things correctly.  It is fixed in the
latest version 1.4.7.

Andy.

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


kernel version

1996-11-17 Thread Joe Feenin
Hello,
   I have been told that the Debian distribution is based on the 2.x kernel
version.  Is this true?  If so if I buy a recent release of a CDROM set say
Informagics will it include this release?  I desparately need an actual
distribution based on the 2.x kernel versions, Ive been told Debian is it. 
Perhaps you all could tell me if I heard correctly.

Joe
http://www.servtech.com/public/fruitcake/linux.html

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help installing debian "Other" packages

1996-11-17 Thread Paul Christenson
On Fri, 15 Nov 1996, Wayne Richardson wrote:

> I can download these packages from the internet from my windows '95
> machine and then transfer them to the Linux system using a diskette. 

> When I try to run dpkg on these files I get errors. 

Are you *certain* that you are transferring them in BINARY mode?

Do you have your floppy drive mounted so that it does automatic *nix<->DOS
conversion?  (It shouldn't.)

   |   This is OFFICIAL WRITTEN notification that I want to be REMOVED   |
   |   from ALL commercial mailing lists.  EVERY message sent from this  |
   | account has had this request posted. ALL UNSOLICITED ADVERTISEMENTS |
   | SENT TO THIS ACCOUNT ARE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL (U.S.) LAW.|

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


UUCP lib/distribution mismatch

1996-11-17 Thread Carl Greco
The uucp_1.06.1-2.deb that was included in the Debian 1.1-14
distribution is not compatible with libc.  The executables (uucico,
etc) are looking for libc.so.4 while this distribution comes with
libc.so.5. Is there an updated compiled uucp packages available?

-- 
\/
 \ Carl Greco   PHONE voice: (402) 496-3381 /
  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]   /
   \==/

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]