Re: Thunderbird 102
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 18:26:39 +0200 Paul van der Vlis wrote: > > Ook cardav en caldav is nu beter geregeld :) > > Wat ervaar je als verbeterd? Voor mij werkte het ook goed in de > vorige versie. Toen ging dat met plugins, maar kennelijk draaide ik een heel oude versie gezien je opmerking :) -- richard lucassen http://contact.xaq.nl/
Re: SSD Optimization - Crucial CT1000MX500SSD1
Your debian is a test version, check your SSD in a LTS debian. bookworm/sid is a testing version. On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 5:34 PM David Christensen wrote: > On 10/2/22 06:19, Marcelo Laia wrote: > >> # cat /etc/debian_version ; uname -a > > > > bookworm/sid > > Linux marcelo 5.19.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 5.19.11-1 > > (2022-09-24) x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > Please install Debian Stable. > > > > > >> Disable the Wi-Fi via CMOS Setup. > > > > This isn't possible in the BIOS. > > > Please reset your CMOS settings: > > > > https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000130200/how-to-use-and-troubleshoot-the-inspiron-15-5547#Issue0_7 > > > >> # dmesg | grep error > > > > Only error related to iwlwifi and r8169 (wifi card) > > > >> # date ; dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1M count=10k ; date > > > > started at 13:01:03 > > finished at 13:01:27 > > > >> How long does it take? > > > > 24 s > > > >> Were there any error messages? > > > > No > > > >> Does dmesg(1) show any errors? > > > > The same previous errors: iwlwifi and r8169 (wifi card) > > > That supports my theory that the problem is Debian Unstable. > > > David > > -- Atenciosamente, Rodrigo da Silva Cunha São Gonçalo, RJ - Brasil
Re: SSD Optimization - Crucial CT1000MX500SSD1
On 10/2/22 06:19, Marcelo Laia wrote: # cat /etc/debian_version ; uname -a bookworm/sid Linux marcelo 5.19.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 5.19.11-1 (2022-09-24) x86_64 GNU/Linux Please install Debian Stable. Disable the Wi-Fi via CMOS Setup. This isn't possible in the BIOS. Please reset your CMOS settings: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000130200/how-to-use-and-troubleshoot-the-inspiron-15-5547#Issue0_7 # dmesg | grep error Only error related to iwlwifi and r8169 (wifi card) # date ; dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1M count=10k ; date started at 13:01:03 finished at 13:01:27 How long does it take? 24 s Were there any error messages? No Does dmesg(1) show any errors? The same previous errors: iwlwifi and r8169 (wifi card) That supports my theory that the problem is Debian Unstable. David
Re: Pasar de Firefox (release) a Firefox ESR
To unsubscribe from this list, send "unsubscribe" in the message subject to: -requ...@lists.debian.org and you will be removed after your confirmation reply has been received. Un Saludo El 2/10/22 a las 08:27, Adolfo Calatayu escribió: Por favor, quisiera que me den de baja de éstas publicaciones, muchas gracias ! El dom, 2 oct 2022 a las 7:09, Alfonso García Rodríguez () escribió: > Según la salida de cpupinfo¹ (aparece la extensión «lm») y las > especificaciones del procesador² puedes instalar perfectamente un > sistema de 64 bits. > > Salvo que hayas elegido manualmente instalar un kernel PAE para tener > binarios de 32 bits y poder usar más de 4 GiB de RAM o se trate de una > máquina virtual donde hayas alterado en el equipo anfitrión las > banderitas de las opciones del procesador... no se me ocurre ningún > otro motivo para que tengas instalado la versión PAE del kernel. > > O eso o se trata de un bug del instalador de Debian, pero en cualquier > caso, con las características de tu portátil (bien dotado) notarás una > merma de rendimiento con un sistema de 32 bits (nativo o PAE) en lugar > de un entorno de 64 bits. > > ¹ https://www.baeldung.com/linux/proc-cpuinfo-flags > ² https://ark.intel.com/content/www/es/es/ark/products/88190/intel-core-i56300u-processor-3m-cache-up-to-3-00-ghz.html > Muchas gracias por todo este análisis, Camaleón, de verdad. Yo no soy un experto en Debian, aunque lo uso desde hace 20 años o más, y no sé cómo pude instalar un núcleo de 32 en un procesador de 64. La verdad es que no tenía ni idea de eso de la versión PAE. Pues nada, tendré que instalarlo de nuevo. Empiezas con Firefox y te meto es esto, se nos ha ido la olla. Jejeje... -- */Gerardo Braica */gbra...@gmail.com.ar /*/*
Re: usrmerge
On 02/10/2022 20:09, Frank wrote: Op 02-10-2022 om 19:12 schreef billium: /bin, /lib(*) and /sbin are directories not links, sorry I did not make that clear. And the corresponding items in /usr? Also directories? What about /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6? Both files? And /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu? Both directories? Did you by any chance copy (or move or symlink) individual files before the usrmerge upgrade? Regards, Frank Thanks Frank /usr/bin /usr/lib* & /usr/sbin are directories /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu & /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu are directories /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 are both files Before the fault occurred I had made no changes (except apt update /upgrade). After the fault, I tried changing the root directory (/lib /bin) files to sym links but got bored by the time I had done thirty different files. I undid the above changes, and the system works o.k., just not upgradeable. Billy
Re: usrmerge
Op 02-10-2022 om 19:12 schreef billium: /bin, /lib(*) and /sbin are directories not links, sorry I did not make that clear. And the corresponding items in /usr? Also directories? What about /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6? Both files? And /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu? Both directories? Did you by any chance copy (or move or symlink) individual files before the usrmerge upgrade? Regards, Frank
Re: usrmerge
On 02/10/2022 18:19, Michael Stone wrote: On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 06:12:45PM +0100, billium wrote: may be I am idiot for keeping it so long since a re-install. I think stretch was the install, and it is now on bookworm. FYI, skipping releases is not supported; in future, go through each release in order when upgrading. Whether that was the cause of the problem it's impossible to say based on the information available. There was no skipping, I went through all testings from stretch through buster, bullseye on to bookworm the years.
Re: usrmerge
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 06:12:45PM +0100, billium wrote: may be I am idiot for keeping it so long since a re-install. I think stretch was the install, and it is now on bookworm. FYI, skipping releases is not supported; in future, go through each release in order when upgrading. Whether that was the cause of the problem it's impossible to say based on the information available.
Re: usrmerge
On 02/10/2022 15:32, Michael Biebl wrote: On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 11:06:55AM +0100, billium wrote: Since the last update to my debian testing I am unable to install anything or upgrade. Setting up usrmerge (31) ... FATAL ERROR: Both /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 exist. How did you arrive in this state? Is /lib already a symlink to /usr/lib on your system? This is a good question. billium, if you by any chance have a backup of your system from before the upgrade, it would be great if you can file a bug report against the usrmerge package so its maintainers can have a look. Michael Thanks Michael /bin, /lib(*) and /sbin are directories not links, sorry I did not make that clear. I only backup /etc and /home and some other setting files, even though it is testing. This is the first big failure, for me, in the years, though re-install is not a big issue, which I will do some time later as it all works but just cannot be updated and no new applications. I see your point in knowing weather the previous or the failed update caused the problem would help the maintainer. But all I can state is that it was between upgrades as no other application installs were made in this time. I do not know what I can say in a bug report ... may be I am idiot for keeping it so long since a re-install. I think stretch was the install, and it is now on bookworm. Billy
Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list
On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 09:08:41 -0400 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > +1 > > But I would suggest putting a copy of the current text of the wiki > page in the email for convenience of those who don't need the > revision history, e.g., first time readers. Not to pick on rhkra...@gmail.com, I just happened to reply to this email. I see a number of suggestions for changes in how the monthly FAQ is managed. I have yet to see any volunteers to take on the necessary work. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/
Re: firmware-iwlwifi
On Sun, 02 Oct 2022 12:41:14 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: > And that the SSH connection is (at least part of) what seems to be > dropping out, which is being interpreted as evidence that there's a > problem with the wireless connection. Good point. Let's see if the original poster (OP) clarifies this. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/
Re: firmware-iwlwifi
On 2022-10-02 at 12:33, Charles Curley wrote: > On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 11:49:14 +0300 > Georgi Naplatanov wrote: > >> I have a notebook (Lenovo) with Intel's WiFi and I have minor issues >> with it - sometimes works as expected but sometimes I cannot connect >> to the notebook at first attempt throw SSH or sometimes latency is >> high. > I'm not sure what you mean by > >> … sometimes I cannot connect to the notebook at first attempt throw >> SSH or sometimes latency is high. > > Connecting to the network and using SSH are two distinct operations. Do > you connect to a network, and then check that you have a working network > before you try SSH? > > What are you using to connect the laptop to a network? Network Manager? I'm not sure, but just in case you missed it: please note that he did not say that he sometimes cannot connect to the *network*, but that he sometimes cannot connect to the *notebook* through SSH. I interpret that (with the rest of the context) to mean that he's connecting the notebook/laptop to the network via Wi-Fi, and then connecting *to* that laptop *from* another computer via SSH. And that the SSH connection is (at least part of) what seems to be dropping out, which is being interpreted as evidence that there's a problem with the wireless connection. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: firmware-iwlwifi
On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 11:49:14 +0300 Georgi Naplatanov wrote: > I have a notebook (Lenovo) with Intel's WiFi and I have minor issues > with it - sometimes works as expected but sometimes I cannot connect > to the notebook at first attempt throw SSH or sometimes latency is > high. Which model Lenovo, and what is the exact wifi device? Please use lspci to identify the device. For example, on my T520: root@jhegaala:~# lspci | grep -i wifi 03:00.0 Network controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8188CE 802.11b/g/n WiFi Adapter (rev 01) root@jhegaala:~# You may have to use lspci with no options to identify your wifi device. I'm not sure what you mean by > … sometimes I cannot connect to the notebook at first attempt throw > SSH or sometimes latency is high. Connecting to the network and using SSH are two distinct operations. Do you connect to a network, and then check that you have a working network before you try SSH? What are you using to connect the laptop to a network? Network Manager? > In kernel log are visible messages for unsuccessful attempts to > load firmware files. Do those correlate with successful or unsuccessful attempts to join a network? Please show us the exact log entry. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/blog/
Re: usrmerge
On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 11:06:55AM +0100, billium wrote: Since the last update to my debian testing I am unable to install anything or upgrade. Setting up usrmerge (31) ... FATAL ERROR: Both /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 exist. How did you arrive in this state? Is /lib already a symlink to /usr/lib on your system? This is a good question. billium, if you by any chance have a backup of your system from before the upgrade, it would be great if you can file a bug report against the usrmerge package so its maintainers can have a look. Michael OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Re: SSD Optimization - Crucial CT1000MX500SSD1
# cat /etc/debian_version ; uname -a bookworm/sid Linux marcelo 5.19.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 5.19.11-1 (2022-09-24) x86_64 GNU/Linux Disable the Wi-Fi via CMOS Setup. This isn't possible in the BIOS. # dmesg | grep error Only error related to iwlwifi and r8169 (wifi card) # date ; dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1M count=10k ; date started at 13:01:03 finished at 13:01:27 How long does it take? 24 s Were there any error messages? No Does dmesg(1) show any errors? The same previous errors: iwlwifi and r8169 (wifi card) If you remove the Crucial SSD, install the previous HDD/SSD, and exercise it with the Debian installer rescue shell, do you see any errors? I will do that at night, to day. Thank you! -- Marcelo
Re: Pastebins [was Re: SSD Optimization - Crucial CT1000MX500SSD1]
Or paste.debian.net Thank you so much! I didn't know it, yet. -- Marcelo
Re: nginx.conf woes
On 02/10/2022 16:12, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 04:07:05PM +0300, Patrick Kirk wrote:
If I
try lynx http://cleardragon.com a similar redirect takes place and I get a
"Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host" error and lynx closes down.
I'm not an expert on nginx configuration, but I did notice one thing:
server {
listen 443 ssl http2;
listen [::]:443 ssl http2;
server_name server_name cleardragon.com
*.cleardragon.com;
You've repeated "server_name" twice here.
Thanks. Good spot but sadly that doesn't fix it.
Re: nginx.conf woes
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 04:07:05PM +0300, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> If I
> try lynx http://cleardragon.com a similar redirect takes place and I get a
> "Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host" error and lynx closes down.
I'm not an expert on nginx configuration, but I did notice one thing:
> server {
> listen 443 ssl http2;
> listen [::]:443 ssl http2;
> server_name server_name cleardragon.com
> *.cleardragon.com;
You've repeated "server_name" twice here.
Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list
On Sunday, October 02, 2022 05:58:23 AM debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: > If the document were maintained using technology such as a wiki (with > restricted edit permissions) then the wiki underpinnings would maintain > the edit history automatically. A link to the wiki page and a statement > as to whether there were any recent changes would then be sufficient, I > think. +1 But I would suggest putting a copy of the current text of the wiki page in the email for convenience of those who don't need the revision history, e.g., first time readers. -- rhk If you reply: snip, snip, and snip again; leave attributions; avoid HTML; avoid top posting; and keep it "on list". (Oxford comma included at no charge.) If you change topics, change the Subject: line. Writing is often meant for others to read and understand (legal agreements excepted?) -- make it easier for your reader by various means, including liberal use of whitespace and minimal use of (obscure?) jargon, abbreviations, acronyms, and references. If someone else has already responded to a question, decide whether any response you add will be helpful or not ... A picture is worth a thousand words -- divide by 10 for each minute of video (or audio) or create a transcript and edit it to 10% of the original.
nginx.conf woes
Hi all,
I have 2 sites to run from one server. Both are based on ASP.Net Core.
Both have SSL certs from letsencrypt. One works perfectly. The other
sort of works. If I go to http://localhost:5100 by redirecting to
https://localhost:5101 and then it warns of an invalid certificate. If
I try lynx http://cleardragon.com a similar redirect takes place and I
get a "Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host" error and lynx closes down.
When I do sudo tail -f /var/log/nginx/error.log I see: 2022/10/02
12:44:22 [notice] 1624399#1624399: signal process started
I'm baffled as to how I can diagnose the problem.
Here's my nginx.conf just in case there is some error in it.
Thanks in advance,
Patrick
user www-data;
worker_processes auto;
pid /run/nginx.pid;
include /etc/nginx/modules-enabled/*.conf;
events {
worker_connections 768;
# multi_accept on;
}
http {
include /etc/nginx/conf.d/proxy.conf;
limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=one:10m rate=5r/s;
server_tokens off;
charset utf-8;
charset_types text/css text/xml text/plain text/vnd.wap.wml
application/javascript application/rss+xml;
sendfile on;
keepalive_timeout 29;
client_body_timeout 10; client_header_timeout 10; send_timeout 10;
server {
listen 80 default_server;
listen [::]:80 default_server;
server_name _;
return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
}
upstream kirksnet{
server localhost:5000;
}
server {
listen 443 ssl http2;
listen [::]:443 ssl http2;
server_name kirks.net *.kirks.net;
ssl_certificate
/etc/letsencrypt/live/kirks.net/fullchain.pem;
ssl_certificate_key
/etc/letsencrypt/live/kirks.net/privkey.pem;
add_header X-Frame-Options DENY;
add_header X-Content-Type-Options nosniff;
location / {
proxy_pass http://kirksnet;
limit_req zone=one burst=10 nodelay;
}
}
upstream RazorHill{
server localhost:5100;
}
server {
listen 443 ssl http2;
listen [::]:443 ssl http2;
server_name server_name cleardragon.com
*.cleardragon.com;
ssl_certificate
/etc/letsencrypt/live/cleardragon.com/fullchain.pem;
ssl_certificate_key
/etc/letsencrypt/live/cleardragon.com/privkey.pem;
add_header X-Frame-Options DENY;
add_header X-Content-Type-Options nosniff;
location / {
proxy_pass http://RazorHill;
limit_req zone=one burst=10 nodelay;
}
}
}
Re: firmware-iwlwifi
On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 11:49:14 +0300 Georgi Naplatanov wrote: Hello Georgi, >thanks for the advice. YW. Sadly, that's all the advice I can offer - I have no experience of using SSH over WiFi, let alone the specific driver set you specified (nothing here requires those drivers). Maybe somebody else _can_ help. However, it seems you have at least one other option to try. Good luck. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is never immediately apparent" / _)rad "Is it only me that has a working delete key?" I'm doubling the rent 'coz the building's condemned Let's Lynch The Landlord - Dead Kennedys pgpgc_ViQfWYb.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Pasar de Firefox (release) a Firefox ESR
Por favor, quisiera que me den de baja de éstas publicaciones, muchas gracias ! El dom, 2 oct 2022 a las 7:09, Alfonso García Rodríguez () escribió: > > Según la salida de cpupinfo¹ (aparece la extensión «lm») y las > > especificaciones del procesador² puedes instalar perfectamente un > > sistema de 64 bits. > > > > Salvo que hayas elegido manualmente instalar un kernel PAE para tener > > binarios de 32 bits y poder usar más de 4 GiB de RAM o se trate de una > > máquina virtual donde hayas alterado en el equipo anfitrión las > > banderitas de las opciones del procesador... no se me ocurre ningún > > otro motivo para que tengas instalado la versión PAE del kernel. > > > > O eso o se trata de un bug del instalador de Debian, pero en cualquier > > caso, con las características de tu portátil (bien dotado) notarás una > > merma de rendimiento con un sistema de 32 bits (nativo o PAE) en lugar > > de un entorno de 64 bits. > > > > ¹ https://www.baeldung.com/linux/proc-cpuinfo-flags > > ² > https://ark.intel.com/content/www/es/es/ark/products/88190/intel-core-i56300u-processor-3m-cache-up-to-3-00-ghz.html > > > Muchas gracias por todo este análisis, Camaleón, de verdad. > > Yo no soy un experto en Debian, aunque lo uso desde hace 20 años o más, y > no > sé cómo pude instalar un núcleo de 32 en un procesador de 64. > > La verdad es que no tenía ni idea de eso de la versión PAE. > > Pues nada, tendré que instalarlo de nuevo. > > Empiezas con Firefox y te meto es esto, se nos ha ido la olla. Jejeje... > >
Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list
john doe wrote on 02/10/2022 at 10:38:59+0200: > On 10/1/2022 4:19 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 06:10:48AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: >>> On 2022-10-01 at 05:46, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>> Debian-user is a mailing list provided for support for Debian users, and to facilitate discussion on relevant topics. Some guidelines which may help explain how the list works: >>> >>> Allow me, if you will, to share my experience on receiving each month's >>> copy of the mailing-list FAQ: >>> >>> "Oh, there's this month's repost of the FAQ." >>> >> >> That's probably a reasonable assumption. It's manually posted by me: it's >> the same text, fairly well, each month (modulo any copying error), it's >> not currently in version control. Now, I might be prepared to change >> that if I were to make any significnt changes. >> > > I assume that you are a Debian maintainer, to me that is unclear in the > e-mail who you are with regard to Debian and what legitimacy you have to > post this in here! > > I have no other comment on the thread itself. Andrew is a Debian Developer and member of the Community Team. Regards, -- PEB signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Pasar de Firefox (release) a Firefox ESR
> Según la salida de cpupinfo¹ (aparece la extensión «lm») y las > especificaciones del procesador² puedes instalar perfectamente un > sistema de 64 bits. > > Salvo que hayas elegido manualmente instalar un kernel PAE para tener > binarios de 32 bits y poder usar más de 4 GiB de RAM o se trate de una > máquina virtual donde hayas alterado en el equipo anfitrión las > banderitas de las opciones del procesador... no se me ocurre ningún > otro motivo para que tengas instalado la versión PAE del kernel. > > O eso o se trata de un bug del instalador de Debian, pero en cualquier > caso, con las características de tu portátil (bien dotado) notarás una > merma de rendimiento con un sistema de 32 bits (nativo o PAE) en lugar > de un entorno de 64 bits. > > ¹ https://www.baeldung.com/linux/proc-cpuinfo-flags > ² > https://ark.intel.com/content/www/es/es/ark/products/88190/intel-core-i56300u-processor-3m-cache-up-to-3-00-ghz.html > Muchas gracias por todo este análisis, Camaleón, de verdad. Yo no soy un experto en Debian, aunque lo uso desde hace 20 años o más, y no sé cómo pude instalar un núcleo de 32 en un procesador de 64. La verdad es que no tenía ni idea de eso de la versión PAE. Pues nada, tendré que instalarlo de nuevo. Empiezas con Firefox y te meto es esto, se nos ha ido la olla. Jejeje...
Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list
> On 2022-10-01 at 18:25, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > >> For example: as soon as you've had more than one change in the > >> entire history of the document, you need to start considering what > >> the previous version against which you're showing differences is. > >> If you try to do it against all of them, it very quickly becomes > >> unwieldy; if you try to do > > > > For me the better option is to point to a version of the file with > > all its VCS history so people can see what's been changed when. > > Yes, but for a tiny and rarely-updated document like this that's even > *more* clearly overkill. If the document were maintained using technology such as a wiki (with restricted edit permissions) then the wiki underpinnings would maintain the edit history automatically. A link to the wiki page and a statement as to whether there were any recent changes would then be sufficient, I think.
Re: firmware-iwlwifi
On 10/2/22 10:22, Brad Rogers wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 20:37:34 +0300 Georgi Naplatanov wrote: Hello Georgi, The package is outdated but it's important. It's the same version as in sid. VCS has -2 (merely bookkeeping updates). Bug tracker shows no blocker bugs and no indication of anything newer. If you have specific problems you're encountering, share them here for assistance. If that doesn't work out, file a bug report. Hi Brad, thanks for the advice. I have a notebook (Lenovo) with Intel's WiFi and I have minor issues with it - sometimes works as expected but sometimes I cannot connect to the notebook at first attempt throw SSH or sometimes latency is high. In kernel log are visible messages for unsuccessful attempts to load firmware files. Anyway, I'll try to use upstream's firmware files for Linux kernel and if these issues disappear I'll file a bug report. Kind regards Georgi
Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list
On 10/1/2022 4:19 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 06:10:48AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: On 2022-10-01 at 05:46, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: Debian-user is a mailing list provided for support for Debian users, and to facilitate discussion on relevant topics. Some guidelines which may help explain how the list works: Allow me, if you will, to share my experience on receiving each month's copy of the mailing-list FAQ: "Oh, there's this month's repost of the FAQ." That's probably a reasonable assumption. It's manually posted by me: it's the same text, fairly well, each month (modulo any copying error), it's not currently in version control. Now, I might be prepared to change that if I were to make any significnt changes. I assume that you are a Debian maintainer, to me that is unclear in the e-mail who you are with regard to Debian and what legitimacy you have to post this in here! I have no other comment on the thread itself. -- John Doe
Re: Thunderbird 102 & {Cal,Card}DAV
On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 06:44:19PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Op 30-09-2022 om 12:57 schreef Geert Stappers: > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Richard Lucassen wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 21:09:16 +0200 Paul van der Vlis wrote: > > > > > > > Ik ben over op Thunderbird versie 102, die zit bij de security > > > > updates. Tot nu toe bevalt hij me wel. > > > > . > > > > Het adresboek is herschreven en staat nu eindelijk in een tab. > > > > > > Ook cardav en caldav is nu beter geregeld :) > > > > > > > In mijn Thunderbird, versie 102.3, installatie vind ik wel agenda en > > adresboek dingen. Wat ik nog niet gevonden heb, is de plek voor het > > configuren van de CalDAV en/of CardDAV server. > > > > Onder welk menu zou ik beter moeten kijken? > > De agenda is wel logisch: > "bestand | nieuw | agenda | op het netwerk". > > Het adresboek staat op een rare plaats, namelijk in het adresboek zelf. > Daar zie je een knop "Nieuw adresboek" met daarnaast een pijl naar beneden, > klap dat open. Je ziet daar "Carddav adresboek toevoegen". Ja, allebei gevonden. Dank. > Groet, > Paul > Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen > https://vandervlis.nl/ Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse
Re: modification de nom de domaine
Top, c'est parfait. Merci Jean-Paul. Amitiés, Laurent. 1 octobre 2022 11:11 "JP Guillonneau" a écrit: > Bonjour, > >> Notre forum a changé de nom de domaine, et je souhaite faire changer l'URL >> (ie >> remplacer https://debian-fr.xyz par https://forum-debian.fr) sur cette page: >> https://www.debian.org/support.fr.html > > Cette partie de la page est du ressort de l’équipe debian-l10n-french. > La modification devrait apparaitre à la prochaine reconstruction du site. > > Amicalement > > -- > Jean-Paul
Re: Modification sur la page https://www.debian.org/support.fr.html
Merci pour lq réponse. Nous tenterons notre chance! :-) Amitiés, Laurent. 30 septembre 2022 17:56 "didier gaumet" a écrit: > Le vendredi 30 septembre 2022 à 12:39 +, l...@forum-debian.fr a > écrit : > >> Bonjour la liste, >> >> Notre forum a changé de nom de domaine, et je souhaite faire changer >> l'URL (ie remplacer https://debian-fr.xyz par >> https://forum-debian.fr) sur cette page: >> https://www.debian.org/support.fr.html >> >> Pouvez-vous me dire qui contacter pour ce genre de demande (J'avais >> trouvé il y a 6 ans, mais je ne trouve plus le contact...) ? >> >> Merci beaucoup. >> Laurent. > > Bonjour, > > d'après https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Webmaster , peut-être envoyer un > mail à webmaster@d.o
Re: firmware-iwlwifi
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 20:37:34 +0300 Georgi Naplatanov wrote: Hello Georgi, >The package is outdated but it's important. It's the same version as in sid. VCS has -2 (merely bookkeeping updates). Bug tracker shows no blocker bugs and no indication of anything newer. If you have specific problems you're encountering, share them here for assistance. If that doesn't work out, file a bug report. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is never immediately apparent" / _)rad "Is it only me that has a working delete key?" Do you want to play? Play With Me - Extreme pgpYXMUCZrcIT.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Pasar de Firefox (release) a Firefox ESR
El 2022-10-01 a las 21:10 +0200, Alfonso García Rodríguez escribió: (...) > > Manda la salida de «grep -i flags /proc/cpuinfo». > > > > Ahí va: > > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov > pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx pdpe1gb rdtscp > lm constant_tsc art arch_perfmon pebs bts xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid > aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma > cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave > avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault epb pti ibrs ibpb stibp > tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid ept_ad fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle > avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm mpx rdseed adx smap clflushopt intel_pt > xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves dtherm ida arat pln pts hwp hwp_notify > hwp_act_window hwp_epp > vmx flags : vnmi preemption_timer invvpid ept_x_only ept_ad ept_1gb > flexpriority tsc_offset vtpr mtf vapic ept vpid unrestricted_guest ple > shadow_vmcs pml (...) Según la salida de cpupinfo¹ (aparece la extensión «lm») y las especificaciones del procesador² puedes instalar perfectamente un sistema de 64 bits. Salvo que hayas elegido manualmente instalar un kernel PAE para tener binarios de 32 bits y poder usar más de 4 GiB de RAM o se trate de una máquina virtual donde hayas alterado en el equipo anfitrión las banderitas de las opciones del procesador... no se me ocurre ningún otro motivo para que tengas instalado la versión PAE del kernel. O eso o se trata de un bug del instalador de Debian, pero en cualquier caso, con las características de tu portátil (bien dotado) notarás una merma de rendimiento con un sistema de 32 bits (nativo o PAE) en lugar de un entorno de 64 bits. ¹ https://www.baeldung.com/linux/proc-cpuinfo-flags ² https://ark.intel.com/content/www/es/es/ark/products/88190/intel-core-i56300u-processor-3m-cache-up-to-3-00-ghz.html Saludos, -- Camaleón
