Fonts in GNOME badly broken!

2002-04-23 Thread Aaron Traas
I helped a friend install Debian today. My friend is new to Linux so I
decided to install KDE and GNOME, plus a few window managers, and showed
him how to use KDM to switch between them.

To make a long story short, GNOME does not function properly. I'm a KDE
user myself, and haven't tried GNOME in over a year before today, and
thus do not know how to set it up properly. He's running Woody, XFree86
4, and 2.4.18 kernel.

The problem? GNOME starts just fine, but anywhere there is supposed to
be a text, it shows funny boxes. KDE and WindowMaker work fine. I have
both 75dpi and 100dpi fonts installed, as well as the msttfcorefonts
package. I can't mess with the configuration dialog, because I get no
text there as well. The text for the window title-bars works (using
Sawfish). GNOME apps, such as the GIMP, also exhibit this behavior when
running under non-GNOME environments.

What did I do wrong? Did I leave out a package?

--Aaron


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



GNOME font wierdness

2002-04-18 Thread Aaron Traas
I helped a friend install Debian today. My friend is new to Linux so I
decided to install KDE and GNOME, plus a few window managers, and showed
him how to use KDM to switch between them.

To make a long story short, GNOME does not function properly. I'm a KDE
user myself, and haven't tried GNOME in over a year before today, and
thus do not know how to set it up properly. He's running Woody, XFree86
4, and 2.4.18 kernel.

The problem? GNOME starts just fine, but anywhere there is supposed to
be a text, it shows funny boxes. KDE and WindowMaker work fine. I have
both 75dpi and 100dpi fonts installed, as well as the msttfcorefonts
package. I can't mess with the configuration dialog, because I get no
text there as well. The text for the window title-bars works (using
Sawfish). GNOME apps, such as the GIMP, also exhibit this behavior when
running under non-GNOME environments.

What did I do wrong? Did I leave out a package?

--Aaron


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Linux-friendliest video card mfg?

2002-02-05 Thread Aaron Traas
Depends what you mean by friendly. NVIDIA pays employees to write their
own high-quality Linux/X11 drivers, but they are closed source. Matrox
and ATI provide some assistance to the open source community in writing
drivers.

If you want high 3D performance, go NVIDIA. If you want solid 2D
performance, go Matrox.

--Aaron Traas

Kent West wrote:
 
 Which video card brand is the friendliest to Linux? I figure to vote
 with my $.
 
 Kent
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problems with kdevelop....

2002-01-27 Thread Aaron Traas
I can't seem to get kdevelop 2.0 (woody, kernel 2.4.17) to generate a
project with CVS support. It normally generates projects just fine, but
when I try to make it with CVS support, it bails, complaining that
Makefile.dist doesn't exist or something. Anyone know what's going on??

--Aaron Traas



Help! NFS Wierdness...

2002-01-26 Thread Aaron Traas
I'm having a really strange problem with mounting NFS partitions on my
Debian box. I have another box running an NFS server on the same
network, and am trying to mount an NFS share on my client PC. I type:

mount 10.1.1.40:/home/cvs -t nfs /home/cvs

And the terminal in which I do this completely hangs. I can close it if
it's an xterm. Sometimes it actually mounts the partition... but still
hangs the terminal. Whether or not it mounts the partition, mount
becomes an unkillable process (kill -9 does nothing). umount similarly
locks the terminal. What am I doing wrong?

FYI: I'm running Woody w/ 2.4.17 custom compiled kernel. Yes, I did
compile in NFS support. What am I doing wrong?



Re: a modest proposal - Debian needs more $

2002-01-21 Thread Aaron Traas
I have an interesting counter-proposal.

Everyone on this list probably uses debian in one way or another. A few
of us, myself included, have a little extra cash which we could give the
project.

Why don't we borrow an old tradition: voluntary tithe. For Debian users,
a suggested donation schedule could be made, such as $2.00 USD per
month, per Debian box if apt-get (or deselect, etc.) was used in that
month. We could make an application called tithe-manageter or titheman
or something, and enable you to set it up on any/all of your debian
boxen, that keeps track of things like dist-upgrades. It would allow the
user to set his/her own tithe amounts per whatever common action the
user wishes to tithe, and optionally store the user's credit card
numbers for automated/manual uploads to tithe.debian.org, so it will be
easy and seamless to donate. 

This would also need to be a centrally managed app, such that the
lightweight tithe-server is run on all the debian boxen (8 of them) on
my local area network, and one of them would be designated as the
tithe=anager client, that would centrally gather all of the data for the
month and either report to me or optionally automagically send a
donation by credit card at the end of the month. 

This would make it simple/automatic to periodically donate small amounts
of cash, for anyone who is too forgetful to do so on a regular basis. At
the same time, it would be an entirely opt-in thing, so people who do
not have the money/do not wish to donate/put in 80 hours a week
maintaining packages are not forced to do so.

--Aaron Traas



Re: a modest proposal - Debian needs more $

2002-01-21 Thread Aaron Traas
martin f krafft wrote:
 
  This would make it simple/automatic to periodically donate small 
  amounts of cash, for anyone who is too forgetful to do so on a 
  regular basis. At the same time, it would be an entirely opt-in 
  thing, so people who do not have the money/do not wish to donate/put 
  in 80 hours a week maintaining packages are not forced to do so.
 
 this is the only good aspect, but why do it that way. people need to 
 get over the herde mentality. if you have money around and you 
 appreciate debian, send a check to one of the main people. 

The reason I propose this is for people like me who really don't think
of it much. I'm terrible at remembering to do regular things, while at
the same time, I'd like to give, say, $200 or so a year to Debian. I
just never thought of it until this thread, and will probably forget
about it next year.

Maybe the method I proposed was a bit complicated, but a structured
method of suggested donations is what people like myself need. 

 if you don't have cash to spare (like me), then donate time. 
 employment = time = money = donation. unemployed = time = donation. 
 why take the extra step ;).

What is entailed in being a Debian developer or package maintainer? I'm
good at coding high level stuff, with rich API's like Java/Swing or
C++/Qt, but really rusty at the low-level C stuff. Where can I help?
(NOTE: I may not be able to do anything until the summer; juggling
classes and consulting work, including my CS senior project.)

--Aaron Traas



Re: installing Woody on new box - best way to go about it?

2001-12-21 Thread Aaron Traas
Rachel Andrew wrote:
 I have a CD with Potato on it, given that I am on a single band ISDN
 dial-up here am I best to install Potato and upgrade or is there 
 somewhere I can download a CD image of Woody? (If so I could get my 
 other half to download that at work on their DSL)

Most of the Woody ISO's and install scripts are really buggy. If I were
you, I'd do a super-minimal Potato install, get networking up, edit
apt-sources, and upgrade to Woody, install packages as needed.

 Is KDE 2.2 still only available in Sid? I have done this process 
 before so I can get the packages from 2 places, however if it has made 
 it into Woody then I needn't bother.

KDE 2.2.1 for the most part is in Woody. Kmail in Woody is unfortunately
still the 2.1 version, and thus does not support IMAP. ARG! I'm waiting
to be able to replace Netscape mail with KMail, as I don't use Netscape
for browsing any more... Konq is good enough for me.

--Aaron



Re: Amount of RAM L1 cache on a processor will support

2001-12-12 Thread Aaron Traas
I don't know how to answer the question you asked, but there is
something you need to consider. Assuming you have an Athlon of the
Thunderbird core or later, you have:

128K of L1 cache
256K of L2 cache

Most CPU's use an inclusive cache mechanism. What this means is that all
data stored in the L1 cache is also mirrored in L2. This makes it easier
to do a fetch; when data is fetched into cache, it is placed into L2.
When a smaller subset is requested, it goes from L2 into L1, leaving a
copy in L2. 

With the Thunderbird core, AMD switched over to using an exclusive cache
mechanism. I.E., the data in L1 is NOT mirrored in L2. Thus, you have
384K of usable cache, and the differentiation of L1 and L2 is just for
speed. Things get swapped between L1 and L2 as needed, but you really
have 384K of cache to work with. That gives you more cacheable mem than
you would with an inclusive system.

Now, with a mere 512MB of RAM on a very modern system, you should be
fine. Most modern systems can handle  1GB without having caching
problems. There are some speed issues to worry about, however; Most
larger DIMMs are slower than smaller DIMMs. For instance, most 512MB
DIMMs are registered, which is slower than unbuffered. Most 512MB DIMMs
have a CAS latency of 3 (CAS = Column Access Strobe), while many smaller
DIMMs are rated at CAS 2. There are also signal integrigty issues with
having 3 or more double-sided DIMMs on the same Mobo (case in point, the
nForce chipset goes into SuperStability Mode if there is a
double-sided DIMM in the third slot, which turns down performance a
great deal to keep from becoming unstable.)

I'm sorry if this answer was more than you bargained for, but I'm known
among friends for not being able to give simple answers :)

--Aaron

David Teague wrote:
 
 If you put more RAM in a computer system than the caching system
 will suppport, the system will run more slowly than it would with
 less RAM. IF I understand correctly, the amount of RAM depends on
 the amount of tag RAM.
 
 I have 512 MB on my Abit MoBo with a 1GHz Athlon.
 
 How do I determine how much RAM the L1 cache in a 1GHz Athlon will
 support?
 
 --David
 David Teague, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Debian GNU/Linux Because software support is free, timely,
  useful, technically accurate, and friendly.
  (I hope this is all of the above.)
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Partial APT mirroring...

2001-12-07 Thread Aaron Traas
There is a package that sorta does what you want... it's called
apt-proxy. You set up a box as your apt-proxy, and point all of your
machines to that box. Every time someone downloads a package, it is
cached on the apt-proxy; thus the first time you download, it will be
slow, but subsequent downloads are done over the local network.

I don't know a whole lot about the packacge, other than it mostly works.
It uses RSYNC rather than HTTP or FTP to get the package from other
Debian servers... not sure why this is. It also is a little flaky; It
often gets to 99% when downloading a package, and then freezes. At that
point I have to ^C and restart the apt-get upgrade/install/whatever and
it works fine. I highly recommend the package.

--Aaron Traas

Don Werve wrote:
 
 I hope I'm not asking for something that has been re-hashed a few dozen
 times, but a Google search hasn't turned much up, and this is a bit of
 an irritant.
 
 How would one go about setting up a local partial APT mirror?  One that
 mirrors only specific trees (such as stable and testing), and can exclude
 arbitrary types of packages (such as source or PA-RISC binaries)?  I've
 looked at Absurd's scripts, but they seem designed for the older APT
 structure, and aren't happy with the pool at all.
 
 I'd like to set up a machine at my place-of-Ork that I can throw this
 partial mirror on, and then have all the Debian boxen we use point to it
 instead of at the Debian servers, thus using less of our (and the Debian
 Project's) available bandwidth.
 
 Thanks-in-advance!
 
 --
 Don Werve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unix System Administrator
 
 Plus je vois les hommes, plus j'admire les chiens.
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DVD player

2001-12-06 Thread Aaron Traas
Peter Good wrote:
 
 On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:15, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
 
  Video RAM is nearly irrelevant.  Anything with 2MB can do
  1024x768/16-bit which is what you want for DVD.  

 This might be a silly question, but why then, do they sell video cards  now, 
 with at least 8mb standard, with 32mb in a lot, and in my case 
 64mb? Just wondering.
 
 Peter.

The Linux kernel only requires like 4 MB of main memory, why do you
install more?

Like is said above, 2MB is required for 1024x768 @ 16bit color. Anything
more will require more RAM. The difference between 16 bit and 24 bit
color is very noticeable. On larger monitors, and higher end laptpops,
you want a res higher than 1024x768.

8MB is all that is needed for simple 2D stuff. If you want to do
anything fancy (dual-head display, 3D accelleration, etc.) you need more
memory. This is particularly useful in 3D accelleration as in order to
render a scene, all the textures must be loaded into video memory. Also,
more video RAM means effects in 2D like double and triple buffering can
work.

In short, the more RAM, the more stuff you can do.

--Aaron



Re: BIG xwindow apps

2001-12-06 Thread Aaron Traas
Craig Dickson wrote:
 
 nate wrote:
 
  in my 5 years of running X windows my experience is X is
  unusable for the most part with anything below 1024x768.
  800x600 is just too painful. i would reccomend using a virtual
  desktop of 1024x768 or higher if your using 800x600. see
  the X docs on how to do this, its not too hard. been
  a while since i had to do it though.
 
 I have never tried to use X on anything less than 1024x768, but why
 should it be any worse than running MS Windows at the same resolution?
 (Purely considered as a graphical display -- ignore the issue of MS
 Windows crashing left and right.)
 

Windows apps, particularly older ones, were designed to be usable at
640x480. I believe X started on Solaris, or at least first caught on
there, and I believe the default then was 1152x864, because at 8BPP, it
fit in 1 MB of video RAM. The first Windows 3.x machines ran almost
exclusively at 640x480, as PC graphics cards really couldn't stand up to
workstation frame buffer devices back then.

X apps *are* generally bigger, and even those that are resizable do not
take into consideration the way the layout shrinks at really small
screen sizes. Most of the WM's use very thick titlebars, KDE and GNOME
by default have very thick panels at the bottom, etc. X at less than
1024x768 is extremely painful.

--Aaron



Re: New User. Hello

2001-11-03 Thread Aaron Traas
Raphael Bustin wrote:
 
 Hello All.  Debian Newbie here.

Welcome! You've chosen the right distro!

 I'm curious why there's no deb package for the
 latest (4.10 ?) version of XFree86.  Or at least,
 I haven't found it on debian.org.
 
 Are there issues running 4.10 of XFree86 on
 potato?

Well, Potato does not contain XFree86 4.1.x... Potato is rather
outdated. XFree86 4.x, 2.4.x kernel, GCC 3.x, KDE 2.x, etc. all
represent significant architectural changes, and can't just be added
willy-nilly to a system that is called stable. Woody (testing) and Sid
(unstable) are much more up to date, but often have major changes on a
weekly basis. If I were running a production server and and apt-get
upgrade changed a significant portion of my installed services, I'd be
worried. 

Very little gets updated in Potato/stable... small, incremental upgrades
occasionally, but mostly bug-fixes and security updates. In fact, when a
bug gets fixed in a newer version of a given piece of software, the
Debian developers often will back-port the bugfix to the version
currently in stable, rather than putting a version of the software with
newer, unknown bugs in.

 It seems my video card (the one I want to use,
 a Matrox G450) is only supported under V4.10 of
 XFree86.

Never used a G450, but I do know that the G200 and G400 both worked in
XFree86 3.x. You won't necessarily get some of the advanced features
(DualHead, 3D accelleration, etc.), but it probably can be coaxed to
work with the Matrox driver.

 I'd prefer the simplest possible acquire/install
 procedure, so I figured a deb package was the thing,
 right?

If it's just a personal desktop system, I'd recommend editing your
apt-sources and dist-upgrading to Woody/testing. Woody is damn stable; I
have it installed on 7 machines in this room. After I got everything set
up properly (read: advanced stuff in X), I haven't had a single crash
(well, a couple of applications crashed, but they were in beta, or apps
that I wrote that weren't debugged yet, etc., but no X locking up or OS
failures).

 Can anyone recommend a serious tutorial on using
 dselect, or an X-based alternative to dselect?
 I just don't seem to grok it yet...  The 'man'
 pages aren't helping.  I invariably end up doing
 something wrong while in Select mode and end
 up Xing out of that for fear of messing things up.
 
 rafe b.

I personally hate dselect. I use apt-get to do everything. I either look
up the packages I need on the web site, or use apt-cache to search. You
really only need to know apt-get install, apt-get update and
apt-get dist-upgrade for 99% of the stuff you will be doing.

--Aaron



Re: GeForce3: X won't start!!!!

2001-10-18 Thread Aaron Traas
Yes, just now, but I'm not sure how it applies... I don't fully
understand it, and does not mention the NVIDIA drivers. X worked before
I upgraded my video card (from Matrox G200).

--Aaron

Colin Watson wrote:
 
 On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 11:45:05PM -0400, Aaron Traas wrote:
  I just got a new GeForce3, and am having problems getting X working at
  all. I'm using an AMD 760 based motherboard with a 1ghz Athlon and SB
  Live!.
 
  I compiled a new kernel, and the NVIDIA kernel module and GLX package. I
  modified XF86Config-4 as the instructions said. When I type startx, I
  get the cool NVIDIA splash screen, and then X just exits. The real
  annoyance is there is NO error message given in the log.
 
  I'm using Woody, the newest version (1541) of the NVIDIA drivers, and
  the 2.4.9 kernel. This is really bugging me! Help!
 
 Have you read Branden Robinson's recent post to this list, with the
 subject line XFree86 news; users of TESTING or UNSTABLE, PLEASE READ?
 
 --
 Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: GeForce3: X won't start!!!!

2001-10-18 Thread Aaron Traas
Thanks! I must have missed that part. Worked like a charm!

--Aaron

Colin Watson wrote:
 
 On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:40:31AM -0400, Aaron Traas wrote:
  Yes, just now, but I'm not sure how it applies... I don't fully
  understand it, and does not mention the NVIDIA drivers. X worked before
  I upgraded my video card (from Matrox G200).
 
 If you are running xfree86-common 4.1.0-7, it may apply to you. It
 doesn't matter what video card you have. Edit
 /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99xfree86-common_start and replace 'exec
 $REALSTARTUP' with 'exec $REALSTARTUP'.
 
 --
 Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



GeForce3: X won't start!!!!

2001-10-17 Thread Aaron Traas
I just got a new GeForce3, and am having problems getting X working at
all. I'm using an AMD 760 based motherboard with a 1ghz Athlon and SB
Live!. 

I compiled a new kernel, and the NVIDIA kernel module and GLX package. I
modified XF86Config-4 as the instructions said. When I type startx, I
get the cool NVIDIA splash screen, and then X just exits. The real
annoyance is there is NO error message given in the log.

I'm using Woody, the newest version (1541) of the NVIDIA drivers, and
the 2.4.9 kernel. This is really bugging me! Help!



GeForce3: X won't start!!!!

2001-10-17 Thread Aaron Traas
I just got a new GeForce3, and am having problems getting X working at
all. I'm using an AMD 760 based motherboard with a 1ghz Athlon and SB
Live!. 

I compiled a new kernel, and the NVIDIA kernel module and GLX package. I
modified XF86Config-4 as the instructions said. When I type startx, I
get the cool NVIDIA splash screen, and then X just exits. The real
annoyance is there is NO error message given in the log.

I'm using Woody, the newest version (1541) of the NVIDIA drivers, and
the 2.4.9 kernel. This is really bugging me! Help!



libterm-stool-perl ????

2001-09-09 Thread Aaron Traas
OK... I'm running a new Woody machine, and someone, somewhere along the
line told me to use Slang for the default configuration interface.

Unfortunately, this is not working. Everything that wants to use slang
gives me errors about not having stool-perl installed.

libterm-stool-perl is listed on the web site as a suggested option when
installing libterm-slang-perl, but is also listed as NOT AVAILABLE, and
has no page of its own. What the hell am I supposed to do?

I'd like to configure debconf to use Dialog instead of Slang to get out
of this mess, but don't know how... can someone please help me?

--Aarn



802.11b reccommendation requested...

2001-09-03 Thread Aaron Traas
Hi... my campus just added a bunch of 802.11b base stations for wireless
access by students. I'm running Woody with a 2.4.7 kernel on a Dell
Inspiron 7500. Does anyone have any experience with an 802.11b wireless
adapter that works with Debian out-of-the-box?

My current network adapter is an Intel PRO/100 and modem combo card that
takes up both slots, and offers a real RJ45 and RJ11 ports, as opposed
to X-jacks or dongles. If I can get an 802.11b adapter that also has
this feature, so I don't have to swap all the time, that would be a huge
plus.

Thanks!

--Aaron



Emacs/X problems...

2001-08-31 Thread Aaron Traas
I'm using Woody/testing, and XFree86 4.x. I'm using emacsen flavor of
Emacs20. 

When I start emacs, using my trusty old .emacs file I've been keeping
and maintaining for years, The colors I've selected aren't quite working
right. Basically, I set the background color to black, and that works,
except or where there's text. Each character taken up by something other
than whitespace has a white background. I've determined it's something
to do with X, as the same .emacs file works beautifully when I export
the display to my Solaris box. 

Does anyone know how to either:
A) Have emacs override X's configuration
-or-
B) What *global* file I'm supposed to edit to make X behave nicely?

Thanks!

--Aaron Traas



Re: Emacs/X problems...

2001-08-31 Thread Aaron Traas
Yes, I am running KDE 2.1.1, and that was the problem! Everything works
now. I did have to restart X to get this to work, however...

Thanks for your help!!

--Aaron

Daniel Katz wrote:
 
  Aaron == Aaron Traas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Aaron I'm using Woody/testing, and XFree86 4.x. I'm using emacsen
 Aaron flavor of Emacs20.
 
 Aaron Basically, I set the background color to black, and that works,
 Aaron except or where there's text. Each character taken up by
 Aaron something other than whitespace has a white background.
 
 Are you running KDE?  I saw behavior like this under KDE until I unset
 the Apply fonts and colors to non-KDE apps checkbox in the control
 center.  On my system, it's in the ControlCenter-LookFeel-Style
 frame.  I run KDE 2.2, when I run KDE.  :-)



Re: XFree86 4.x RENDER extension...

2001-08-28 Thread Aaron Traas
William Leese wrote:
 
 
 Oddly enough, at home I have debian unstable running on a machine with an
 Ati Rage Pro, which ofcourse is Mach64 based, _with_ the RENDER extension.
 Although before XFree86 4.1 there didn't seem to be support for it (atleast,
 i never got it work), but now RENDER simply works.
 
 Not that I use it though... because when i turn on anitaliasing in KDE only
 the ugliest fonts seem to be available to all X applications. I'd rather
 have everything in a good font (lucida, helvetica) than have to look at an
 ugly one that is antialiased.

Aren't True Type Fonts Antialiasable? If so, the msttcorefonts package
will (upon installation) log on to MS's web site and download all of the
free (as in beer) Microsoft Core Fonts including Arial, Comic Sans,
Times New Roman, Tahoma (my personal favortite) and Verdana.

--Aaron



Re: Help! telnetd not working!

2001-08-26 Thread Aaron Traas
I'm very well aware that telnet is not a secure protocol, and would
never install it on a machine that is directly accessible to the outside
world. It's on a fileserver on an internal network behind a firewall. I
do know what I'm doing from this respect. I'm a newbie to Debian, not to
*NIX and networking.

--Aaron

Karsten M. Self wrote:
 I'll issue the standard advisory:  telnetd is an insecure protocol and
 it's very strongly recommended that you *not* install or activate
 telnetd on your system.  SSH is an encrypted, authenticated drop-in
 replacement, with clients available for all significant computing
 platforms.
 
 --
 Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com  http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
  What part of Gestalt don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/   http://www.kuro5hin.org
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA!http://www.freesklyarov.org
 Geek for Hirehttp://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
 
   
Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature



XFree86 4.x RENDER extension...

2001-08-25 Thread Aaron Traas
I'm running Woody with Xfree86 4, and am wondering what I have to do to
get the RENDER extension to work, and thus get KDE to anti-alias fonts.
Can someone point me in the right direction? 

BTW: My graphics adapter is an ATI Rage Mobility Pro, and the system is
a Dell Inspiron 7500.

--Aaron



Help! telnetd not working!

2001-08-25 Thread Aaron Traas
I just installed debian on a new system today. Everything is working
beautifully, except telnetd. I'm using xinetd (also tried inetd), and
when I attempt to telnet to the machine, it sends me the contents of
/etc/issue.net, and then eats up 99% CPU and just hangs. I don't know
what to do. Any help would be appreciated.

--Aaron Traas



Re: Speedo font?

2001-08-08 Thread Aaron Traas
You could try editing your XF86Config-4 file and removing the line that
includes those fonts... Don't know if this will make X work, but at
least it will fix this error. 

(I am assuming that since you are running woody, you are also running
XFree86 4.0x)

--Aaron

Jeff Maxson wrote:
 
 I got my rage 128 video card today, fired up xf86config, went through
 that, and did the startx thing.  Tadah!  There was the grey screen and an
 X in the middle...for about half-a-second.  The thing then quits, and
 spits me back out to console (on cntl-alt-F7, whatever you call that).  I
 hit cntl-alt-F1 (the thing I was running when I typed startx), and the
 last line says Could not init font path element
 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo, removing from list! and that's all she
 wrote.
 
 I've got all the standard font pkgs installed, and I updated all my stuff
 dealing with X last night (I'm running woody).  Any help getting past that
 and into X desktop?  I installed gdm, and it looks fine, and if you try to
 log in, it pops you right back to the login screen...hmmm...
 
 TIA
 Jeff
 
 --
 Jeff Maxson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Qt and Gnome both on system?

2001-08-08 Thread Aaron Traas
Not quite... if you are using GNOME or KDE apps, you at least have to
have the libraries installed. Feel free to use the apps in another
window manager, but if the base libraries aren't installed, the apps
won't run. 

In the case of most KDE apps, Qt isn't enough. The KDE folks extended Qt
quite a bit, and thus still need some of the KDE libraries to run.

--Aaron

Matthew Garman wrote:
 
 On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:38:45AM -0700, Geoffrey Romer wrote:
  Your question is sort of unclear. First of all, I should clarify
  something- Qt is just a GUI toolkit- a library which programs can, if
  they chose, link against in order to provide the widgets which Qt
  provides. Since it's just a library, no 'switching' is involved- just
  run a program which uses Qt, and it will use Qt. All of the same
  applies to another toolkit, GTK/GTK+, which might be what you're
  referring to when you say 'Gnome.' In that case, you don't need to
  worry about switching- Qt and GTK apps can coexist with no problems
  whatsoever.
 
 Does this imply that you don't need GNOME or KDE in order to run programs
 that were written for one of those desktop environments?  For example,
 the GNOME terminal, or some other program that has 'gnome' in its title?
 How about Konqueror, or other KDE apps?  Can I run these programs with
 only GTK and QT installed?
 
 Stated another way, are there any programs that *require* any part of the
 GNOME or KDE desktop environments to be installed?
 
 I ask because I've been running GNOME for a while.  But I don't really use
 any of the features it provides over a standalone window manager, so I
 don't see any reason to keep it.  I can free up some space and install QT
 for some KDE apps that I've been wanting to look into for a while :)
 
 Thanks,
 Matt
 
 --
 Matt Garman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I'll tip my hat to the new constitution, Take a bow for the new revolution
  Smile and grin at the change all around, Pick up my guitar and play
  Just like yesterday, Then I'll get on my knees and pray...
 -- Pete Townshend/The Who, Won't Get Fooled Again
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Linux on less than 8MByes of Memory

2001-08-06 Thread Aaron Traas
You're right, I did mean to send to the list.

You must be looking in the wrong places for RAM... Crucial.com has 32MB
EDO SIMMs for $42, and 16MB SIMMs for $24, with free UPS 2-day shipping.
So in the case that you want 48MB, that's only $68, and if you want to
go with 32MB, that's $48 US. 

You are probably right, however, that you can get a full system for this
price...

-- Aaron

dman wrote:
 
 [ You probably meant to send this to the list ]
 
 On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:06:03AM -0400, Aaron Traas wrote:
 | Another solution is tospend a couple of bucks on more RAM. RAM is really
 | cheap today.
 
 The only memory that is cheap nowadays requires a modern mobo as well.
 I have looked into getting more RAM for that 486 -- it uses 72 pin EDO
 or Fast Page (I'm not really sure which) SIMMS.  It also only has 2
 slots.  Presently it has 2 4MB SIMMS in it and to get a 32MB SIMM and
 a 16MB SIMM (it can only handle 48MB, I tested it at a couple of local
 shops) would cost close to $100 US.  I could get a whole new system
 for that price.  (Like a used 486/Pentium with memory, hard disk,
 case, NIC, sound)
 
 | If, by some strange chance, you use DIMMs, your in even better shape.
 | 128MB DIMM can be had for $25, and you only need one.
 
 Yeah, my new Duron box has 256MB PC133 RAM in it because the (new)
 memory was so cheap.  Most of it is used for buffers/cache now and I
 never even hit swap!
 
 -D



Questions about XFree86 4.x

2001-08-02 Thread Aaron Traas
I'm running Woody and Xfree86 4.03 on a couple systems, and have a
couple minor problems. Some questions on how to do a few things:

1) I installed a bunch of font packages in Woody, but X does not load
them by default. I found them in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts, and proceeded
to add them via 'xset fp+' and 'xset fp rehash'. Though this worked, I
find myself having to do this with each X login session. Is there any
way to tell X, globally, to always load them?

2) Speaking of fonts, I can't get AA fonts working under KDE. Is there a
package I need to install? Is it related to the following error I get
when I run most KDE apps from the console:

Xlib:  extension RENDER missing on display localhost:0.0.
_IceTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.ICE-unix should be set to root

3) When I start emacs, using my trusty old .emacs file I've been keeping
and maintaining for years, The colors I've selected aren't quite working
right. Basically, I set the background color to black, and that works,
except or where there's text. Each character taken up by something other
than whitespace has a white background. I've determined it's something
to do with X, as the same .emacs file works beautifully when I export
the display to my Solaris box. 

4) in my /etc/profile, I add the line:
alias ls='ls --color -F'
This works very nicely at the console, but for some reason, when I'm in
X, this doesn't work in Konsole or Xterm. I have to do an:
exec bash --login
Each time I open up a terminal to get this working correctly. This also
happens when I use 'su'. Is there any way to guarentee consistent
behavior despite login method??



X won't allow display export...

2001-07-31 Thread Aaron Traas
I am unable to successfully export the display from one of my Debian
boxen to another. I tried the following on the box I was using X on:

xhost +

and the following on the box I was trying to export the display from:

export DISPLAY=10.1.1.33:0.0

Normally, this has worked under other distros and Unices (I have a
Mandrake box and two SPARC's running Solaris 8 here), but I can't get it
to work under Debian. Is there some package I've forgotten to install??

--Aaron Traas



PCMCIA Ethernet card in 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-30 Thread Aaron Traas
I recently installed Potato (2.2r2) on my laptop, re-pointed my
apt-sources to the 'testing' branch, and did an apt-get dist-upgrade.
Everything worked 100% perfectly (after some tweaking to get X running,
that is :).

ANYway, there were a few features I needed that weren't compiled into
the stock kernel (like APM and such), so I decided to download the
latest kernel source in Woody's tree (2.4.6) and compile it. Everything
seems to work now except my ethernet card. I did compile in all of the
PCMCIA stuff as modules, as I don't know which driver I should use. My
card is an Intel EtherExpress PRO 10/100 PCMCIA card. I really don't
know what to do next. I did look at the Debian install manual, and even
tried to download the  pcmcia-source package (although it looks like
these directions were meant exclusively for the 2.2 series kernels), and
the make-kpkg modules_image failed. What am I doing wrong? Do I need to
modprobe a module (no modules are running under the 2.4.6 kernel I
compiled)? If so, which one?

Thanks.

--Aaron Traas



CD-RW Question...

2001-07-25 Thread Aaron Traas
I have a question... Could someone please recommend a reliable IDE/ATAPI
CD-RW that works out-of-the-box with Debian? Like, something I could
just plug in and start burning. Also, I'd like one that isn't too picky
about different brands of media. The Ricoh in my Win98 box isn't that
reliable, and doesn't like Memorex and other common brands of CD-R
blanks.

Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

--Aaron



MySQL question

2001-07-24 Thread Aaron Traas
I currently have a database-driven web site up, with a PHP front end and
MySQL back-end. The problem I'm having is that the login for the
database is root and my root password. How do I change this?

Also, I plan on having multiple web sites and thus multiple databases.
Can I tie a user and password to one specific database (or set of
databases) rather than giving said user access to all databases?

Thanks in advance.

--Aaron



Re: MySQL question

2001-07-24 Thread Aaron Traas
I'd like to thank everyone for answering so quickly. You guys gave me
great places to start looking, and I think I have a solution.

--Aaron



PhpMyAdmin and PHP4...

2001-07-20 Thread Aaron Traas
OK, I'd like to run PhpMyAdmin, but it seems to require PHP3 to be
installed, and satisfying this dependency also requires removing PHP4.
Is it safe to install and ignore the dependencies? If so, how do I tell
apt-get to ignore the dependencies? Thanks!

--Aaron



Question: PHP4 and Apache on Woody

2001-07-02 Thread Aaron Traas
Hi, I just apt-get installed Apache, and it seems to work just fine. I
then installed PHP4, and apache did not seem to recognize PHP files.

I've tried several extensions: .phtml, .php, ,php3, php4... none of them
work. The first three act really odd... when I click on them in my
browser on another machine, it treats them like a downloadable file, and
prompts me to specify a download location. The 4th (.php4), however,
acts totally different. It instead is just displayed in the browser as
plain, preformatted text... the tags and such are visible as well.

I instpected httpd.conf, and there are mentions of libph4.so, but they
are all commented out. I could remove the comments and configure Apache
myself the old fashioned way, but is this the correct way of doing
things? Will it get stomped by future installing of software?

One last question: do apache and apache-ssl use identical httpd.conf
file formats? If so, would it be prudent for me to symlink them both to
a common httpd.conf?

Thanks in advance!

--Aaron



Quick Lilo question...

2001-07-01 Thread Aaron Traas
I've finally got Lilo set up just how I want it, almost. I'd like a boot
option that sends me straight into single user mode. Yes, I know I can
just enter Linux single at the boot prompt (or something similar... I
don't quite remember), but I'm lazy, and would like a boot option I can
select from the boot menu.

Thanks!

--Aaron



Help!!! Ethernet card hell!

2001-06-23 Thread Aaron Traas
Overall, I love Debian as an OS. I've used it many times in a work
environment, and apt-get simply rules. However, I have yet to
successfully install Debian on one of my home machines. Here is the
situation:

I have 5 different ethernet cards without a permanent home: 4 different
Tulip variants, and a Netgear FA311. I'm trying to get these to work on
Debian 2.2r2. I am unable to get 2.2r3 because A) my CDRW on my Windoze
box just died, and B) I can't get this machine to work with any ethernet
card I have, so installing over the network is not an option.

I've tried absolutely everything on the Tulip variants... all versions
of the driver included (ng_tulip, old_tulip, tulip) in various ways.
Most recently, I got one of the variants of the tulip to work by
installing a clean system, and entering the following commands:

insmod tulip
ifconfig eth0 inet 10.1.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.1.1.255
ifconfig eth0 up
ping 10.1.1.1

And everything worked fine! It was great! So I decided to re-install the
system, and configure everything I wanted. I selected the tulip driver,
and it loaded. I entered the same information above, along with a
default gateway and DNS server address. The install finished, and I
tried to ping the same address. It timed out. 

I tried various things, including rmmoding the driver, and insmoding it,
and redoing everything with ifconfig, but nothing works.

I'd like to know what is going on here. I know for the fact the card was
working just a few minutes ago. I also know that all of the cards I have
work well under both Red Hat and Mandrake, which I used prior to Debian
and got sick of. 

Also, what driver am I supposed to use for the Netgear FA311? In other
distros, it uses natsemi.o, which is not present in Debian 2.2r2.

Can someone tell me what is going on? Debian is an incredibly robust OS,
but if it can't work with the same ethernet cards that other distros use
with ease, I'm going to have to switch back. I have 4 machines I want to
install Debian on, all of which are currently running Mandrake and have
Tulip cards in them (one of them has 4 such cards and is being used as a
router), and I can't afford to just buy 7 new NICs. 

Does anyone have a solution for me?



Re: Help!!! Ethernet card hell!

2001-06-23 Thread Aaron Traas
I can't upgrade to the new kernel because I can't get the new kernel
because I don't have a network connection. 

I tried downloading the network stuff from Scyld, but was unsuccessful
in compiling them. I think I need the kernel-header package which is not
included on my potato CD.

Does Woody ship with 2.4 kernel? If so, can I just download the install
floppy and try that way? Otherwise, does anyone sell Woody CD's?

Thanks for your response.

--Aaron

Edward Kear wrote:
 
 natsemi is included in kernel 2.4.x. If you can upgrade to that, that would 
 be best.
 You can download the driver for kernel 2.2.x from
 www.scyld.com/network/ethecard.html
 read www.scyld.com/network/updates.html for compiling/installation 
 instructions.
 good luck
 
 On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 11:42:19AM -0400, Aaron Traas wrote:
  Overall, I love Debian as an OS. I've used it many times in a work
  environment, and apt-get simply rules. However, I have yet to
  successfully install Debian on one of my home machines. Here is the
  situation:
 
  I have 5 different ethernet cards without a permanent home: 4 different
  Tulip variants, and a Netgear FA311. I'm trying to get these to work on
  Debian 2.2r2. I am unable to get 2.2r3 because A) my CDRW on my Windoze
  box just died, and B) I can't get this machine to work with any ethernet
  card I have, so installing over the network is not an option.
 
  I've tried absolutely everything on the Tulip variants... all versions
  of the driver included (ng_tulip, old_tulip, tulip) in various ways.
  Most recently, I got one of the variants of the tulip to work by
  installing a clean system, and entering the following commands:
 
  insmod tulip
  ifconfig eth0 inet 10.1.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.1.1.255
  ifconfig eth0 up
  ping 10.1.1.1
 
  And everything worked fine! It was great! So I decided to re-install the
  system, and configure everything I wanted. I selected the tulip driver,
  and it loaded. I entered the same information above, along with a
  default gateway and DNS server address. The install finished, and I
  tried to ping the same address. It timed out.
 
  I tried various things, including rmmoding the driver, and insmoding it,
  and redoing everything with ifconfig, but nothing works.
 
  I'd like to know what is going on here. I know for the fact the card was
  working just a few minutes ago. I also know that all of the cards I have
  work well under both Red Hat and Mandrake, which I used prior to Debian
  and got sick of.
 
  Also, what driver am I supposed to use for the Netgear FA311? In other
  distros, it uses natsemi.o, which is not present in Debian 2.2r2.
 
  Can someone tell me what is going on? Debian is an incredibly robust OS,
  but if it can't work with the same ethernet cards that other distros use
  with ease, I'm going to have to switch back. I have 4 machines I want to
  install Debian on, all of which are currently running Mandrake and have
  Tulip cards in them (one of them has 4 such cards and is being used as a
  router), and I can't afford to just buy 7 new NICs.
 
  Does anyone have a solution for me?
 
 
  --
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Etherenet card problem.

2001-05-10 Thread Aaron Traas
Hello, I'd like some help with a problem I'm having.

I've tried to install two varients of Debian: 2.2r2 and Progeny 1.0. In
both of those cases I have failed to get my ethernet card working. 

I have two cards laying around, a Linksis LNE100TX and a Kingston
KNE110TX. Both are tulip variants. Both worked under Mandrake 7.2.
Niether is working under Debian.

They are both detected, the tulip module is loaded (I do know how to use
modprobe and lsmod :).

I am not a Linux newbie, but I'm a newbie to Debian. I have played
around with other Debian boxen my friends had around, and apt-get is
really cool, as is the rock-hard stability. I decided I was tired of
Mandrake and RedHat, as they are both flaky, and I have NEVER manually
installed an RPM upgrade without having to use --FORCE. 

Thanks for any help you can give me.

--Aaron