Re: module-assistant not detecting kernel headers

2010-10-16 Thread Anticept .
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Anticept . antic...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:19:49AM -0400, Anticept . wrote:

 Fixed that symlink too, unfortunately this did not help.

 Module-assistant appears to be malfunctioning as well. After it fails
 to find the kernel headers,

 You can assist it: -k /path/to/kernel/source/directory


 This did not help. Unfortunately, I found a bug report where alsa
 1.0.23 will NOT compile with m-a at this point in time.

 I'm going to try and just slip the alsa source into the kernel source
 and rebuild. Will keep up to date on the result.

 -Anticept


Forgot to give an update on this. I've decided not to mess with trying
to recompile, as the Jack Plugin for Alsa is working fine now. The
applications that I was using which were having problems had to be
rebuilt with Jack support, and now it's all gold.

Thanks
-Anticept


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimbq3tvpgi_n86jte1bk=wq9as6gwxov-=m8...@mail.gmail.com



Re: ping packet loss when size gt 1500

2010-10-16 Thread Anticept .
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Adam Hardy adam@cyberspaceroad.com wrote:
 I have a bizarre problem with the server at 208.245.107.9, which is an
 internet broker whose server keeps disconnecting when making data requests.
 Their support is blaming the problem on me.

 208.245.107.9 is used by a huge number of clients and I apparently am the
 only one suffering.

 Could it be something on my LAN? Or could it be my ISP (British Telecom)
 whose DNS server will randomly go down for a while and then come back (not
 in sync with the appearance of this problem though) - I thought I'd state
 that to give an idea of the ISP's reliability.

 Or is this ping problem definitely something I can sort out and perhaps
 solve it?

 Thanks
 Adam

Use OpenDNS or google DNS. Don't rely on your ISP DNS, as most of them
don't know how to run them very well.

Also, if British Telecom uses PPPoE, you can't have a packet size over
1492 (MTU size). 1500 is standard on non-PPPoE connections. It's not
really an issue at all, just means you will need to transfer a tiny
few packets more (you won't notice). In fact, if you are indeed using
PPPoE, it would be good to make sure your MTU size is set to 1492 so
your router won't have to fragment it to transmit.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin3kmugoqhucd3yvfohqhro0mdpgpbm1p7_j...@mail.gmail.com



Re: ping packet loss when size gt 1500

2010-10-16 Thread Anticept .
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
 On 10/16/2010 03:20 PM, Anticept . wrote:
 [snip]

 Use ... google DNS.

 So instead of just knowing everything you search, and all of your email,
 they also know everywhere you surf?

 --
 Seek truth from facts.


I'm not concerned over google's information gathering policies. They
tell you they gather your information. They've had a few mistakes and
oopsies, but have been better than many.

-Anticept


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktindcvkunbf01a9bnvmfczsoknvnvpxy5ihul...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Unidentified subject!

2010-09-23 Thread Anticept .
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:37 PM,  debian-user@lists.debian.org wrote:


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100923164127.ga5...@deeebian



What was this?

-Anticept


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik2zowouap=8sp9iwuhdx91wdcdeolcbrj9x...@mail.gmail.com



Re: df: where is the root fs?

2010-09-02 Thread Anticept .
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:45 PM, hugo vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
 Hi,

 When I do 'df /' I get:

 Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
 /dev/hda6             13456580   5923184   6849832  47% /
 tmpfs                   253024         0    253024   0% /lib/init/rw
 udev                     10240       900      9340   9% /dev
 tmpfs                   253024       140    252884   1% /dev/shm
 /dev/sdc7             38456308  14630328  21872480  41% /sda7

 but when I do 'tune2fs -l /dev/hda6' I get:

 tune2fs 1.41.3 (12-Oct-2008)
 tune2fs: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/hda6
 Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock.

That's because you have SATA drives according to fdisk below. These
show up as serial devices, which will be sd[x][#], with [x] being
your drive according to bios in alphabetical order, and the [#] being
the partition number in order according to your partition table. I do
not know why df is showing them as hda, but I know a few other
utilities don't make this distinction either. You just have to
remember.

 Then when I do: 'fdisk -l' I get:

 Disk /dev/sda: 60.0 GB, 60011642880 bytes
 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 7296 cylinders
 Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
 Disk identifier: 0x34fe34fd

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
 /dev/sda1               1         383     3076416   12  Compaq diagnostics
 /dev/sda2   *         384        3814    27559507+   c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
 /dev/sda3            3815        7296    27969165    f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
 /dev/sda5            3815        5471    13309821    b  W95 FAT32
 /dev/sda6            5472        7173    13671283+  83  Linux
 /dev/sda7            7174        7296      987966   82  Linux swap / Solaris

[...]

 So here it appears that root is sda6!


It is. tune2fs -l /dev/sda6 should work fine.

 What other way is there other than df to find where the root fs is mounted?


Not sure, but if you just remember you are using sata drives, and they
show as sd[x][#]. Maybe fstab will help?

-Anticept
(if any of my information above is incorrect or misleading, please correct me!)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=gvnysvadj+2rghw+qmi3m2nmygr9xbzdry...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Have you ever...

2010-09-01 Thread Anticept .
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Poo Py debiantux...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Had dog sex?  Or posted naked? I need to kno. cuz I won't support a distro
 that has people doing that. It's a sin and I don't like sinners much.


This is probably a troll post, but if it is true, based on your logic,
you shouldn't be living in a city since politicians lie, you should
probably stop using the internet as your ISP is provided by greedy
people, and you should probably quit breathing because sinners have
breathed the same air.

Long story short, your logic defeats itself. Don't worry about what
other people have done, only worry about yourself. I don't like some
of them either, but it's not my place to judge them based on my
religion. That is reserved for the big man upstairs.

-Best regards
-Anticept


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikmpz+rj=vj6b8jevpn111pufktmvvyz5x-a...@mail.gmail.com



Re: A warning how not to upgrade from Lenny to Squeeze

2010-08-26 Thread Anticept .
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Paul Richards paul.richa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Everything else like the new boot scripts, upgrade to grub2, new
 kernel, etc are working great.


 --
 Paul Richards
 @pauldoo


Don't forget the aptitude purge ~c to clean out all those leftover,
and possibly conflicting, config files and package remains!
dpkg -l | awk '/^rc/ {print $2}' | xargs dpkg -P if you don't have aptitude.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikszjghev=0sqt797sa5mad=l4dd0g0ndyuk...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Mixing apt-get and aptitude

2010-08-25 Thread Anticept .
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:09 PM, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I used to use either apt-get or aptitude to install packages. Is it OK to
 do so?

 I read [1] that it is not a good idea.
 Please comment.
 thanks

 [1] http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/ubuntu-63/mixing-apt-*-and-
 aptitude-nok-828408/


There is no reason that these two can't be mixed. Aptitude, however,
keeps track of packages in which you have marked, and will
automatically remove dependencies that are no longer needed. Check
man aptitude for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikfzw3efgvj9xvh1dercujjhunw+to4atis8...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Mixing apt-get and aptitude

2010-08-25 Thread Anticept .
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:21 PM, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com wrote:
 On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:16:44 -0400, Anticept . wrote:

 I used to use either apt-get or aptitude to install packages. Is it OK
 to do so?

 I read [1] that it is not a good idea. Please comment.
 . . .

 There is no reason that these two can't be mixed. Aptitude, however,
 keeps track of packages in which you have marked, and will automatically
 remove dependencies that are no longer needed. Check man aptitude for
 more information.

 apt-get can keeps track of manual installed packages and dependencies one
 as well. Check man apt-get for more information.



I'm sorry, I didn't mean to come across like that. There was a couple
sentences I removed which I had typed; what I meant to say is: I
believe there are a couple of other more subtle things that aptitude
does that apt-get can't do, check man aptitude for more information.

Again, sorry :(
-Anticept

P.S. Can apt-get hold back package updates like aptitude? This might
be one of them.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=xvk32h0z+6yb-e=3r0x=vovoxe_pn7ss=r...@mail.gmail.com



Re: module-assistant not detecting kernel headers

2010-08-24 Thread Anticept .
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:19:49AM -0400, Anticept . wrote:

 Fixed that symlink too, unfortunately this did not help.

 Module-assistant appears to be malfunctioning as well. After it fails
 to find the kernel headers,

 You can assist it: -k /path/to/kernel/source/directory


This did not help. Unfortunately, I found a bug report where alsa
1.0.23 will NOT compile with m-a at this point in time.

I'm going to try and just slip the alsa source into the kernel source
and rebuild. Will keep up to date on the result.

-Anticept


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimfkdxkevd2ihtvjkq-pi_pee-b5u9buhp_y...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Verbatim 1TB external HDD

2010-08-24 Thread Anticept .
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
 Jochen Schulz wrote:
 Bob Proulx:
 No, they couldn't. :) Windows (since at least XP) doesn't allow
 formatting disks larger than (IIRC) 32GB with the FAT filesystem. It's
 either NTFS or… NTFS.

 So...  FAT32 supports up to 8T in size, MS-XP can use it, but MS-XP
 won't format it?  Wow.  I did not know that XP had that limitation.
 Thanks for that tidbit.  I will add it to my list of MS problems.

This is because FAT32 is highly inefficient on partitions above 32GB.
You can use third party tools to make partitions even larger than
this, and XP won't have an issue reading from them as long as LBA is
enabled.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktiny3+qjl43qkqrbzaadznbfwueppcuptnarg...@mail.gmail.com



Re: module-assistant not detecting kernel headers

2010-08-23 Thread Anticept .
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Angus Hedger demide...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hey there,

 I would check the /lib/modules/kernel version/build symlink

 Make sure its pointing to /usr/src/linux-headers-kernel version

 I have had some problems with stuff not being about to find k-headers
 due to this.

 Regards,

 Angus


Fixed that symlink too, unfortunately this did not help.

Module-assistant appears to be malfunctioning as well. After it fails
to find the kernel headers, if i use any keys except left and right
and the spacebar, it will rapidly spew errors that get covered up by
the menu, shortly before crashing out. I've also tried ctrl+c to exit,
but that just breaks my gnome terminal and I have to force-close it.

I tried using m-a  errors to see if I can catch those errors, but all
I get is an empty file. Suggestions on diagnosis?

-Thanks
-Corey


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikhrp8dpwlrayjjupe=fion1=dd-eb4mnxzp...@mail.gmail.com



module-assistant not detecting kernel headers

2010-08-22 Thread Anticept .
I'm using a custom built kernel that I've created with make-kpkg using
the debian kernel source, and I've also created and installed
kernel-source and kernel-headers with that same utility.

I need to rebuild the alsa modules to include the module called
aloop, which isn't included in the stock kernel, and I can't find it
in my custom kernel either.

I've tried using the m-a utility, but it keeps saying it cannot find
my kernel's headers. I've used m-a prepare which created the
symlink, but it still cannot find the headers. The symlink is fine, it
links to my kernel headers in /usr/src. I figured this won't really
work anyways as aloop was not one of the modules listed in the m-a
utility for alsa anyways, but I'd still like to know why m-a can't
find my headers.

I've also tried grabbing the alsa-driver-1.0.23.tar.bz2 from the alsa
project, and build and installed it according to
http://alsa.opensrc.org/index.php/Jack_and_Loopback_device_as_Alsa-to-Jack_bridge
. The only thing I did differently is that i used --with-cards=all:

./configure --with-cards=all --with-oss=yes --with-sequencer=yes

However, when I tried to sudo modprobe snd-aloop, it said something
about unknown symbol in aloop.ko(?) (i had since rebooted and had to
purge and reinstall the kernel because the kernel wouldn't even load).

I need to get that aloop module built and loaded to try and create the
Alsa to Jack bridge. Any suggestions?

Much appreciated in advance!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=jmlyz2i5b56f4gsexcdo+05fxztzhxagmd...@mail.gmail.com