Re: stupid questions about apt-get/dpkg
re, Ethan Benson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:05:20AM -0900: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:56:04PM +0600, Bram Dumolin wrote: > > > > > > exim gets removed, postfix gets installed. > > > > oic, I just tried with qmail, but that was the .deb I created from source, > > so I imagine the dependency info is not in there... > > I never tried with something else. > > this is because you didn't use apt, dpkg does not deal with > depenencies other then bitching about them. im not sure if you can > purge exim and install the qmail .debs simultaneously or not. another > method would be to make a mini apt archive and point apt at it via > deb file:/whereever it might be simpler to just purge exim and > whatever it depends on (unless thats everything) then reinstall them > after you install qmail. hmm but it sounds like too much trouble for installing a small package :) There should be an option in dpkg/apt, -R, --ReplaceDependency :) > > DJB should change his policy, especially with all the bind shit happening > > right now, djbdns could become one of the major DNS systems. > > Well, too bad, I prefer security over functionality. > > DJB does not seem to understand that unless he licences his software > under a Free Software licence it will never achieve large following. I guess not. It's realy a pity, as it would be so nice to know that everybody is running djbdns and qmail :) At least we would get rid of the burdons of running antique soft. (Note: I don't have anything against exim or postfix) Well, it's his choice, who are we to argue :) Ok status update: I got it replaced with qmail (had to install procmail and ucspi-tcp(from src)). I love apt-get BTW :)) It should be working soon, still have some lib probs : avluv:/usr/src# /etc/init.d/qmail start Starting mail-transfer agent: qmailid: qmaild: No such user id: nobody: No such user sh: error in loading shared libraries: libc.so.6.1: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory . avluv:/usr/src# grep -e nobody -e qmaild /etc/passwd nobody:x:65534:65534:nobody:/export/home:/bin/sh qmaild:x:64011:65534:qmail daemon,,,:/var/qmail:/bin/false -- People using html in email should be shot. My brother-in-law has found a way to make ends meet. He goes around with his head stuck up his ass. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: stupid questions about apt-get/dpkg
re, Nathan E Norman([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:50:58AM -0600: > > How do you simply replace a package with another package that offers the > > same functionality? > > exim provides mail-transport-agent > > qmail as well > > > > so I want to upgrade mail-transport-agent from exim to qmail > > > > What's the best way to do that? Pointers on a good apt-get/dpkg faq? > > You could install the qmail-src package, create the deb, and install > it. That's what I did, but it complained that it was conflicting with exim. > Better yet, follow Adam McKenna's HOWTO at > http://www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html. Leave exim installed. > Remove any start links for exim (find /etc/rc?.d -name S\*exim | xargs > rm) and make sure exim isn't running out of /etc/inetd.conf. Comment > out the crap /etc/cron.d/exim too. :) I would like to have it the right way though, as a real deb without any traces of exim... > A zillion people will now bitch at you and claim that qmail is > "non-free". While that's the debian party line I'm beginning to > suspect debian holds this view because of the abrasive personal nature > of Mr. Bernstein rather than a careful analysis of what's posted at > his site. (Note to zealots: I'm not interested in your flames. Yell > at your dog). I don't give a shit if they complain, everyone is entitled to their opinion and that doesn't mean I'm going to listen to it ;) I believe in qmail, have been running it for the last 3 to 4 years. All software created by djb, well, the stuff I use anyway, has been good to me, not one problem that I couldn't solve or could blame someone else for, and _NO_ security issues whatsoever. If I look back on my sendmail and bind days... argl :) -- People using html in email should be shot. Statisticians probably do it. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: stupid questions about apt-get/dpkg
re, Ethan Benson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:38:57PM -0900: > > How do you simply replace a package with another package that offers the > > same functionality? > > exim provides mail-transport-agent > > apt-get install postfix > > exim gets removed, postfix gets installed. oic, I just tried with qmail, but that was the .deb I created from source, so I imagine the dependency info is not in there... I never tried with something else. > > qmail as well > > > > so I want to upgrade mail-transport-agent from exim to qmail > > > > What's the best way to do that? Pointers on a good apt-get/dpkg faq? > > qmail is not packaged except as source because its non-free. I know, but I think qmail is a very good MTA, it being non-free is not entirely true. It's non-free to distribute as binary, but it is as source... So free enough for me :) DJB should change his policy, especially with all the bind shit happening right now, djbdns could become one of the major DNS systems. Well, too bad, I prefer security over functionality. -- People using html in email should be shot. Good day for water sports. Take a bath with a friend. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
stupid questions about apt-get/dpkg
re all, How do you simply replace a package with another package that offers the same functionality? exim provides mail-transport-agent qmail as well so I want to upgrade mail-transport-agent from exim to qmail What's the best way to do that? Pointers on a good apt-get/dpkg faq? -- People using html in email should be shot. Democracy can learn some things from Communism: for example, when a Communist politician is through, he is through. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: NAT/MASQ in single NIC
re, Osamu Aoki([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:42:23PM -0800: > Well .. I danno... Never done it. Just a thoght which may work. > > Seriously, PCI NIC costs only $20 these days. I have 2 NICs and MASQ > them to access Cable and LAN. It will act as good firewall too. If you only have one nic, you can still masq, it's not a problem if you _just want to masq_. Security wise it's not much of a gain, but it helps getting online with a couple of computers. What you should do is : -- # ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 # route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0:0 # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward # ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.255 -d 0/0 -j MASQ -- Now you should be able to masq, just don't forget to point your client machines their default gw to 192.168.1.1 Note: I just want to say again: for security you need two nics! -- People using html in email should be shot. Opinions are like assholes -- everyone's got one, but nobody wants to look at the other guy's. -- Hal Hickman By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: Console text scrambled (in a different way :)
re, Hall Stevenson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:32:20PM -0500: > > If I display a file which contains binary data, often there will > > be a sequence of characters which the console interprets > > to 'switch character sets' and then any lower case characters > > become little boxes, or patches of fuzz, yet numbers and > > upper case characters are unaffected. > > > > I know of no way to fix this, although a little script to output > > the 'switch back to normal mode' characters would be handy > > Type "reset", hit Enter. Don't worry if you can't see what you type... > use one finger to make sure you spell it right !! ;-) I remember the times when people where _flashing_ on irc :) (sending some kind of combination of binary data to render your terminal unreadable). The easy fix for that was "echo c" that's echo ctrl-v esc-c -- People using html in email should be shot. Democracy can learn some things from Communism: for example, when a Communist politician is through, he is through. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: Slow DNS Lookup (4TH POSTING)
re, Alvin Oga([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 03:55:02PM -0800: > what does the snippetts of your dns files look like ??? > > -- are you supporting more than one domain name on your lan ??? > > soa records > a records > ns records > ptr records > > $TTL > $ORIGIN > > contents of > named.boot/named.conf What about just overriding the reverses locally, that should solve your problem fairly quick. You shouldn't ask for permission from the guys who are authorative for them for the internet because you are running a local cache and you want to connect to them, right? (Sorry, just woke up and have skimmed through the thread...) Add a zone called 157.59.64.in-addr.arpa and in that one you put : 18 IN PTR ns.emergeknowledge.com. that should fix it locally. -- People using html in email should be shot. Dope will get you through times of no money better that money will get you through times of no dope. -- Gilbert Shelton By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: Drawing diagrams of servers
re, Russell Coker([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 02:26:01PM +0100: > Thanks to Bram Dumolin for the reference to tkined (scotty). I haven't > checked it out as dia is a program dedicated to my task which seems to work > well. actually I didn't mention it but someone whose email didn't come through : Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thank him :) -- People using html in email should be shot. My father was a creole, his father a Negro, and his father a monkey; my family, it seems, begins where yours left off. -- Alexandre Dumas, pere By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: Drawing diagrams of servers
re, Russell Coker([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:07:07PM +0100: > I want to draw some diagrams of a network showing things such as "user > uploads files to an FTP server, FTP server uses rsync to push data to web > server, users download data from web server". I want to do this will little > boxes representing each machine etc. > > Years ago I used visio to do this on Windows. > > I tried Kivio (KDE visio-like program) but it doesn't allow me to specify > types of lines between objects (I want arrows to show direction the data > flows), it doesn't seem to allow labels on lines, and is generally klunky. > > Is there a good program in Debian that allows this? > > Please CC me direct when you reply, I'm not on the list. I'm not sure if this is what you want but try "dia" :) -- People using html in email should be shot. If clear thinking created sparks, we could safely store dynamite in James Watt's office. -- Wayne Shannon, KRON-TV By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: hogyan kezdjek neki a debiannak?
re, Pap Tibor([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:38:19AM +0100: > Sorry for the hungarian post. Why apologize if you can answer in English? :P -- People using html in email should be shot. A Nixon [is preferable to] a Dean Rusk -- who will be passionately wrong with a high sense of consistency. -- J. K. Galbraith By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: who/finger output - billions of pts
re, Erdmut Pfeifer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:21:09PM +0100: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 12:57:52PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote: > > why is this? what's different about wtmp/utmp (i presume) on > > suse/redhat than on debian? i don't want finger to show 20+ logins of > > my account when all i did was login once and opened xterms > > otherwise... > > > > any pointers? > > rxvt has a compile-time option for wtmp/utmp support. Maybe that's > where the distros differ... > For testing purposes you might want to roll one your own rxvt > (reasonably simple) without wtmp/utmp support and see if the > problem/feature goes away. > (Or, if you are lucky, the one from SuSe runs on Debian too...) or just remove the -s bit, then it won't be able to write to the [uw]tmp file. I don't know if it's sgid or suid but just chmod 0755 it. (note: I can't check it here as none of my Workstations run Debian for the moment. I know, I know, but for work I had to install Mandrake, and on my Powerbook the thing that installed the fastest was Suse which I got from a friend. And here in Sri Lanka, the lines are too slow to download the cdimage in a reasonable timespan, I should get one of those cheapbytes sent to me (which will probably take 2 months to get here *sigh*)) -- People using html in email should be shot. There's more than one way to skin a cat: Way number 32 -- Wrap it around a lonely frat man's pecker. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: LILO on my windows partition
re, The Doctor([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 09:42:31AM -0500: > Like an idiot, I accidentally wrote a LILO boot into my windows partition, so > nw booting from my LILO to windows (on /dev/hda3) starts up another LILO that > croaks with > LI > is there a way to be able to boot windows again? > This will be complicated by the fact that the folks at HP only provided a > hard drive image (ghost) of the factory default drive and not windows 98 > disks. I can get a copy $$$ if neccesary, but I don't like donating money to > unworthy software projects. You should be able to just run fdisk /mbr (from DOgS, you have a DOgS bootdisk, do you?) Also make sure you have a linux bootdisk. Pop in the DOgS bootdisk, run fdisk /mbr (this will clean the mbr). Pop in the linux bootdisk, rerun lilo with the correct configfile. -- People using html in email should be shot. Love does not make the world go around, just up and down a bit. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: HD size problem (IBM 30 GB)
re, CaT([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:41:12PM +1100: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 12:38:14PM +0600, Bram Dumolin wrote: > > > This'll get you a testing fdisk compiled for your system. Worked > > > brilliantly > > > for me. > > > > uhm the fdisk source isn't there... > > not in stable, not in testing, ... > > Can you give me your sources.list entry? > > Ooops. linux-util or util-linux is what you want. my line is: > > deb-src ftp://debian-ftp.pacific.net.au/debian testing main contrib non-free > > change the hostname to what's appropriate for you. tnx :) But still doesn't work... Might be a kernel driver prob... 2.0.33 is pretty old... Too bad of the patches, I should rewrite them I guess. -- People using html in email should be shot. If you think sex is a pain in the ass, try different position. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: debian command list
will trillich([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:42:26PM -0600: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:40:19AM -0800, Mike Egglestone wrote: > > Hi all... > > I'm looking for a web site that would have > > a nice list and basic description of debian commands. > > Anyone know of such a place? > > > > or even just linux commands for that matter... > > one cool trick most linux shells offer is 'completion' meaning: > > type a few letters and press TAB, to see what's available > that starts with that 'string' of letters. > > try > > mo > apt > add > loc > > and then to find more out about any of those, try > > man > info > [browse to] localhost/doc/ or -doc >--help > > commands available to your account are those in directories > mentioned in your $PATH variable. try > > echo $PATH > > to see them -- then nose around in each to see what's there. > What you can also do, and how I learned a lot is : cd /bin whatis * that will give you a small description of every command in there. Try it for /bin, /usr/bin, /sbin, /usr/sbin, /usr/local/bin, ... Then you can do man or info to get more information. -- People using html in email should be shot. Opinions are like assholes -- everyone's got one, but nobody wants to look at the other guy's. -- Hal Hickman By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: rebuilding dpkg db from manual compiled stuff
Brian May([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:46:56PM +1100: > >>>>> "Bram" == Bram Dumolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Bram> 1) How do you rebuild the dpkg db on a system where there > Bram> are so many self-compiled/installed programs that you lost > Bram> track of it. I mean, is there a simple way of checking them > Bram> in the db, so you can upgrade easily to the newest versions > Bram> or do you have to install the debs and then remove your > Bram> originally compiled programs. > > apt? I know apt, and I love it :) but that wasn't what I meant. I used to install Debian because I liked the install and where it put stuff. Everything on there is compiled by hand until recently when I discovered apt :) so I want all those programs to be in my dpkg db, so I can upgrade them through apt-get. > Bram> 2) Is there a way to update the dpkg db, with your own > Bram> program info. Without creating a .deb. ex: I installed x > Bram> from sources and of course there isn't anything in my system > Bram> except the binaries and the config files, that show that I > Bram> installed it. Can I manually add that to the dpkg db? Or > Bram> should I just edit some files in /var/lib/dpkg ? > > You should install packages like this under /usr/local. > > Also see the "stow" package. ok tnx, but I want them in my dpkg db, not in a seperate db :) -- /bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] People using html in email should be shot. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
rebuilding dpkg db from manual compiled stuff
re, 2 questions: 1) How do you rebuild the dpkg db on a system where there are so many self-compiled/installed programs that you lost track of it. I mean, is there a simple way of checking them in the db, so you can upgrade easily to the newest versions or do you have to install the debs and then remove your originally compiled programs. 2) Is there a way to update the dpkg db, with your own program info. Without creating a .deb. ex: I installed x from sources and of course there isn't anything in my system except the binaries and the config files, that show that I installed it. Can I manually add that to the dpkg db? Or should I just edit some files in /var/lib/dpkg ? -- /bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] People using html in email should be shot. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
HD size problem (IBM 30 GB)
re, Machine: linux-2.0.33, Debian slink, upgraded to latest stable (potato?) I have an IBM 30 GB hd and it shows up as a 4GB in fdisk. Does someone know if this is a kernel issue or something else? In the bios I put it as LBA. Although this might not be a Debian specific problem, I'm running Debian on that box :) -- /bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] People using html in email should be shot. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
Re: Fwd: Re: ssh version ?
Vadim Kutsyy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:51:36AM -0500: > > I was wondering what the deal is with the version of ssh. > > 1.2.3-9.2 is the latest version shipped with Debian. > > But the original openssh site says : 2.3.0p1 > > Can someone enlighten me on this? > > debian:/usr/local# ssh -V > SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0p1, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. > Compiled with SSL (0x0090600f). > > I belive 1.2.3 is in stable. If you want better, upgrade to unstable, > or at least testing. Ok tnx but I don't understand why they put 1.2.3 as the latest, and in security updates in the stable version. They announced on Bugtraq that 1.2.3 fixes the recent key exchange bug but the openssh page says 2.3.0p1 does that. Why do they go against the versioning of the original tree? Is there some logical system behind this? And how can I know that 1.2.3 fixes the bugs that were in pre 2.3.0p1? tnx :)
Fwd: Re: ssh version ?
(This might get on the list more than one time. I don't know what's wrong with my submission to this list as I get replies from some .jp domain, not being descriptive whatsoever). I was wondering what the deal is with the version of ssh. 1.2.3-9.2 is the latest version shipped with Debian. But the original openssh site says : 2.3.0p1 Can someone enlighten me on this? -- People using html in email should be shot. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
ssh version ?
hello, I was wondering what the deal is with the version of ssh. 1.2.3-9.2 is the latest version shipped with Debian. But the original sources say : 2.3.0p1 Can someone enlighten me on this? -- /bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] People using html in email should be shot. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
ssh version ?
hello, I was wondering what the deal is with the version of ssh. 1.2.3-9.2 is the latest version shipped with Debian. But the original sources say : 2.3.0p1 Can someone enlighten me on this? -- /bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] People using html in email should be shot. By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each violation.
