RE: [Fwd: Installing debian with Win98]

1999-01-07 Thread Chang, FKK
 --
 From: Ed Cogburn[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: donderdag 7 januari 1999 8:21
 To:   Debian-Users
 Cc:   recipient.list.not.shown
 Subject:  Re: [Fwd: Installing debian with Win98]
 
 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
  
  Now, if I could only get that silly Window$ logo at boot time replaced
  with something more Linux, like a penguin ...
  
 
   Just in case you don't know:  You can disable that Windows boot logo
 with an
 entry in msdos.sys (a text file now) of Logo=0 in the Options section.
 Works
 for W95.
   Replacing it with a penguin is an entirely different matter, though.
 :-)
 
No it isn't... the file c:\logo.sys is in fact a .bmp file (Pathetic MS
attempt
to ensure nobody changes their logo)

HTH,

Felix




RE: killing off the *)@ NT bootloader

1998-12-23 Thread Chang, FKK
Once the c:\bootsect.lnx file exists, you can put in /etc/lilo.conf:

boot=/win95/bootsect.lnx

(assuming c:\ is mounted on /win95, which in my case always is)

and you won't have to do the dd thing ever again. Saves a lot of trouble
*especially* when you forget the dd thing!

HTH

Felix
 ___
 Felix Chang
 
 Hoogovens Research  Development
 P.O. Box 10.000
 1970 CA  IJmuiden
 tel (+31) 251 492927
 fax (+31) 251 470114
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 --
 From: Rafael Kitover[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: woensdag 23 december 1998 2:22
 To:   debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Cc:   recipient.list.not.shown
 Subject:  Re: killing off the *)@ NT bootloader
 
 I use the NT bootloader to boot between NT/dos|95/linux, the
 Linux+NT+Win95 or whatever it was called HOWTO in /usr/doc/HOWTO/mini was
 very helpful, basically I have an entry for c:\bootsect.lnx in my
 c:\boot.ini. And updated it with a new kernel or whatever. So basically
 after a new kernel I do:
 
 dd if=/dev/sda5 of=/win95/bootsect.lnx bs=512 count=1
 
 where /dev/sda5 is my linux partition and /win95 is my win95 (primary dos
 or whatever the hell) partition.
 
 Also, the howto says you have to copy the bootsect file to a floppy and
 reboot or whatever, but using something like the above this step is not
 necessary.
 
 On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 08:13:01PM -0500, Sean Johnson wrote:
  An easier solution is to open Disk Administrator
 {Start-Programs-Administrative
  Tools-Disk Administrator} and mark the Linux partition as active.
  
  Sean
  
  Jeff Katcher wrote:
  
   Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
   
yikes, that thing is stubborn.  I've supposedly installed lilo half
 a
dozen times, and the thing still comes up asking which NT
 configuration
to use . . .
   
It needs to be able to boot NT at least for a little while . . .
   
   Okay, i'm flyin by the seat of my pants here, but you should be able
 to
   add an entry to the NT C:\BOOT.INI file that will point to your linux
 in
   some way (isn't there a howto on this somewhere??)  try the linux
   howto's maybe there is a Linux+NT HOWTO.
  
   Jeff
  
 
 -- 
 Rafael Kitover
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 /dev/null
 


RE: APM on Linux?

1998-12-22 Thread Chang, FKK
I'm experiencing the same. On my machine, suspend mode  usually
triggers a lockup after some while. Moreover, crontabs won't run and 
the system clock runs slow (well,  not the system clock in BIOS
but the Linux one); I also use the vgetty for faxing and that didn't
work anymore either.

So, I chose to disable suspend in BIOS and only allow the
PC to fall into standby mode. Until now, this works.

BTW, I  have an Asus TX97 with AMD K6-233.
The apm utilities work well, (except for apm -s :))

If someone has a solution I'd be happy to learn of it.

Felix
 ___
 Felix Chang
 
 Hoogovens Research  Development
 P.O. Box 10.000
 1970 CA  IJmuiden
 tel (+31) 251 492927
 fax (+31) 251 470114
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 --
 From: Jinsong Zhao[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: dinsdag 22 december 1998 0:31
 To:   debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Cc:   recipient.list.not.shown
 Subject:  APM on Linux?
 
 Hi,
 
 It would be very nice if we can leave the computer on without
 consuming too much energy. My computer has a CMOS option to turn the
 APM on system (doze, standby, suspend) and harddisk. If I disable the
 feature, no problem; but if I enable those features, the computer
 locked after some time: no response at the keyboard, dead.
 
 The APM works fine on X11: the monitor will automatically enter
 suspend mode after sometime. Hope this feature also works on the whole
 system.
 
 What's the best way to set up the BIOS and kernel? Thanks a lot!
 
 Jinsong
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 /dev/null
 


WP8 - now does it *read and write* Word docs?

1998-12-21 Thread Chang, FKK
Hello all,

All the ranting about Corel's misleading strategies aside, before I download
it (paying by the minute, you know), I'd like to know:

1) does it load Word 95 (or 97) docs *correctly* ?
2) does it write these *correctly* ?
3) can it cope with fastsave docs *correctly*?

With `correctly', I mean does it also understand some done-by-myself
meddling with normal.dot and strange objects like embedded .bmps 
in such a fashion that what comes out of the printer does
look in some way like what I see on the screen etc, etc, ...
(I had *quite* some problems in StarOffice with this)

I don't need the equation editor (LaTeX is my friend), but I'm perfectly
willing to sacrifice some megs on my HD for not having to reboot to NT
to read silly Word attachments to my e-mails...

Has someone encountered/discovered anything?

Greetings

Felix
 ___
 Felix Chang
 
 Hoogovens Research  Development
 P.O. Box 10.000
 1970 CA  IJmuiden
 tel (+31) 251 492927
 fax (+31) 251 470114
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


RE: hardware questions - Promise Ultra DMA 33 + Asus TX97E

1998-12-14 Thread Chang, FKK
Thanks, though I didn't really need it (it is mostly about patching
old kernels). 

I got things working by experimenting with the order, jumpering
and master/slave combinations of the drives. 
(Quite a lot of combinations, 4 interfaces, 8 ports, 5 drives, 
master/slave choice, etc,etc..) At a certain point it just
miraculously worked..

Can't (won't :)) even reproduce the problem now. Strange.

Regards
Felix
 ___
 Felix Chang
 
 Hoogovens Research  Development
 P.O. Box 10.000
 1970 CA  IJmuiden
 tel (+31) 251 492927
 fax (+31) 251 470114
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 --
 From: Curt Daugaard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: donderdag 10 december 1998 12:31
 To:   Chang, FKK
 Cc:   recipient.list.not.shown
 Subject:  Re: hardware questions - Promise Ultra DMA 33 + Asus TX97E
 
 My hardware is similar to yours and the mini-howto helped me get
 up and running.  You'll find it at 
 
 http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/Ultra-DMA.html
 
 If you find you have trouble with Lilo let me know.  I found I had
 to alter its source and recompile it before things would work
 right.
 
 Good luck.
 
 Curt Daugaard
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 /dev/null
 


RE: switch of Debian

1998-12-11 Thread Chang, FKK
 Never turn off the computer just like that. (It's just like Win 95 :))
 
 Log in as root and issue a 'shutdown' command. The system
 has to do some administrative  tasks before shutting down, the most
 important of which is to flush the filesystem buffers.
 Be careful, you might lose data and/or end up with corrupted
 data if you don't do this! The same applies for rebooting.
 
 See man shutdown for details.
 
 HTH,
 Felix
 ___
 Felix Chang
 
 Hoogovens Research  Development
 P.O. Box 10.000
 1970 CA  IJmuiden
 tel (+31) 251 492927
 fax (+31) 251 470114
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 --
 From: Michael Wahl[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: vrijdag 11 december 1998 15:00
 To:   debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Cc:   recipient.list.not.shown
 Subject:  switch of Debian
 
 Hello out there,
 
 After all I finally installed DEBIAN.
 And, what else, I have a question:
 When I successfully logout, a knew login appears. Know I switch of the 
 computer. When I switch it on again, there is a check for some stuff.
 Is this right? Or have I not correctly finished it?
 
 Please help a greenhorn!
 
 Thanks 
 
 Michael, Trier, Germany
 
 __
 Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 /dev/null
 
 


hardware questions - Promise Ultra DMA 33 + Asus TX97E

1998-12-10 Thread Chang, FKK
Hello all,

I know that hardware questions aren't reallly the thing here
but I do not have regular access to newsgroups so I try anyway :)

OnIDE0 (Motherboard) I have a UDMA Quantum fireball 3.2G as master, no
slave;
On IDE1 I have DMA quantum sirocco 1.6G as master (PIO4), no slave;
Since I want to attach some other IDE devices (CD, Zip, CD-RW, Tape)
,without
disturbing the 'fast' HDs, I have bought
a Promise Ultra DMA-33 card for ide2 and 3. It is given IRQ 10 by the BIOS
and the video card (Tseng ET6000) gets IRQ11. These IRQs are both unused by
ISA
cards.

I run stock hamm, custom kernel 2.1.131 (or 2.0.36). I have an Asus
mainboard 
TX97E, K6-233, 80M. ISA MAD16 sound card, IRQ 7/9, Ditto Dash, IRQ5,
Internal modem on ttyS3, IRQ 3. 

A problem arises when I start Linux with the new card.
When booting, it always hangs on
checking partitions... 
hda:
and nothing happens. Ctl-alt-del doesn't work. 

I turned off all BIOS settings for UDMA and set drive I/O to the lowest
level
(mode 0/0). Then I get (from the top of my head) some messages in braces:
checking partitions
hda:
{ DriveSeek Complete Drive Not ready Error 0x50 }
or somthing like that. The drive still hangs.

BTW, there are NO drives attached to the card (yet). When I remove 
the card, all is OK. NT boots as well (always, btw).

Questions...:
Strange thing is, the card (formally) has nothing to do with hda, or does
it?
I know UDMA used to be a problem, but not with these recent kernels I use?
What DMA channel is used for it? Should I reserve it in BIOS?
I hope someone has an idea here
If you want, I'll be more specific (though I have no access to that PC here)

Thanks in advance,

Felix

 ___
 Felix Chang
 
 Hoogovens Research  Development
 P.O. Box 10.000
 1970 CA  IJmuiden
 tel (+31) 251 492927
 fax (+31) 251 470114
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Re: (off-topic)

1998-12-08 Thread Chang, FKK
Hello all,

I am having a discussion with my colleagues here about the use of  RE:
in mail reply messages. Since the Dutch versions of certain Microsoft Mail
programmes use AW: for replies (Antwoord, Reply), people here are 
convinced that Re: stands for Reply. I always thought it was the Latin
re as in about, or subject.

Anyone who can shed some light on this matter?

Thanks

Felix
 ___
 Felix Chang
 
 Hoogovens Research  Development
 P.O. Box 10.000
 1970 CA  IJmuiden
 tel (+31) 251 492927
 fax (+31) 251 470114
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


RE: PPP options for different providers - how ?

1998-11-30 Thread Chang, FKK
Thanks to all who suggested that I toss away my /etc/ppp/options 
file and reinstall using pppconfig.

It now works.

Felix


PPP options for different providers - how ?

1998-11-24 Thread Chang, FKK
Hello all,

I hope someone can help me with the following problem.

I have three providers, with different names, so that i can 
use pon name1 etc. The scripts are made with pppconfig and
they work.

Problem is, for each one I have different options, such as

dns xxx.yyy.zzz.uuu
name myname
auth

etc.

in the file /etc/ppp/options. These should be different for each
provider (esp. the login name, authentification, etc.). Now it
only works  for one provider.

How can I make sure that the right options file is read for each
provider?

Thanks in advance,

Felix
 ___
 
 Felix Chang
 
 Hoogovens Research  Development
 P.O. Box 10.000
 1970 CA  IJmuiden
 tel (+31) 251 492927
 fax (+31) 251 470114
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 ___
 Felix Chang
 
 Hoogovens Research  Development
 P.O. Box 10.000
 1970 CA  IJmuiden
 tel (+31) 251 492927
 fax (+31) 251 470114
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Debian and Win32?

1998-11-09 Thread Chang, FKK
Hello all,

As I am forced to work with Dos 95 at work here - after a fruitless crusade
to be at least *allowed* to use Debian/TeX, I stumbled upon the Cygnus 
win32 - GNU - thing. 

Nice, since I now can use Xfig, my favourite drawing program and bash, 
my favourite shell on this stupid 95 machine here 
(unfortunately - as you may notice - still stuck with M$ exchange and NO 
TeX allowed)

Some questions (or rather, thoughts) then occurred to me.

This cygnus-win32 base seems an ideal base for distribution of free software
a la Debian, using the cygnus lib instead of the linux kernel. Am I right? 
It would be a VERY nice  opportunity to have '95 people discover the joy of
free
software with all its blessings. Is there any effort towards this being done
by Debian
(or any other gnu/linux-based organisation)

If so, why don't I hear anything of it? If not, why not? Copyright issues?
Money? 
Fear of M$ lawyers?

Bye

Felix

PS The same goes for XFree. Why no X server for 95/NT machines?


Zip drives

1998-11-05 Thread Chang, FKK
Hello all,

Is there a package that can get/set the status of Zip disks like
the Iomega tools do (write protect, unprotect until eject, etc.)?

Bye

Felix