[Fwd: Patch troubles]

1997-08-28 Thread Curtis L. Daugaard
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks for your post.  After starting with a clean kernel source and
following your instructions, the patch attempt still results in scads of
skipped hunks and .rej files.  It seems clear there is a major problem
somewhere.  I'm sure I haven't looked far enough to learn how to correct
the .rej files or guess the underlying problem, but I just don't have
the time.  I'll wait for the 2.1 kernel to graduate to stable.

Thanks again.  

--
C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> 
> "Curtis L. Daugaard" wrote:
> 
> > I'm not an utter newbie, but I feel like it right now.  I have a
> patch
> > (to support certain hardware) against 2.0.30 that I've successfully
> > applied.  Good.  But I guess I'm just clueless about how to apply
> the
> > pre-patch 2.0.31-1 through 2.0.31-7 (to gain support for the LS-120
> > drive).  I've checked the Kernel HowTo, documentation in the kernel
> > sources, directories from which the patches were downloaded, man
> page
> > for patch, etc., but I the patches don't succeed.  Even after a
> fresh
> > reinstall of the sources, patch repeatedly alerts me that it thinks
> I'm
> > trying to reapply a patch.  So I guess my questions come to this:
> >
> > 1.  What is needed to apply the pre-patches mentioned above?
> 
> Just the pre-patch 2.0.31-7 in /usr/src/
> and clean 2.0.30 sources in /usr/src/linux/
> 
> cd /usr/src
> gunzip -dc pre-patch-2.0.31-7 | patch -p1 -s -N -E -d /usr/src/linux
> 
> > 2.  Should the patch against 2.0.30 be applied before or after the
> > pre-patches?
> 
> Whatever works!
> Look for .rej files when done and possibly edit them in by hand:
> 
>  find . -name "*.rej"
> 
> > My thanks to anyone who can help.
> 
> Hope it does.
> --
> Peter Galbraith, research scientist
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Maurice-Lamontagne Institute, Department of Fisheries and Oceans
> Canada
> P.O. Box 1000, Mont-Joli Qc, G5H 3Z4 Canada  418-775-0852 - FAX
> 418-775-0546
--- End Message ---


Patch troubles

1997-08-27 Thread Curtis L. Daugaard
I'm not an utter newbie, but I feel like it right now.  I have a patch
(to support certain hardware) against 2.0.30 that I've successfully
applied.  Good.  But I guess I'm just clueless about how to apply the
pre-patch 2.0.31-1 through 2.0.31-7 (to gain support for the LS-120
drive).  I've checked the Kernel HowTo, documentation in the kernel
sources, directories from which the patches were downloaded, man page
for patch, etc., but I the patches don't succeed.  Even after a fresh
reinstall of the sources, patch repeatedly alerts me that it thinks I'm
trying to reapply a patch.  So I guess my questions come to this:

1.  What is needed to apply the pre-patches mentioned above?

2.  Should the patch against 2.0.30 be applied before or after the
pre-patches? 

My thanks to anyone who can help.

--
C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Debian support for Ultra ATA controller cards

1997-07-02 Thread Curtis L. Daugaard
I have been unable to find out whether drivers are available or under
development for this new generation of IDE cards.  I have a Promise
Ultra33 and Debian 1.3 will not recognize the drives on the card during
installation.

Anyone out there have any info?

Thanks.

-- 

C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Solution to irqtune problems

1997-06-04 Thread Curtis L. Daugaard
This solved the problem.  Thanks.

On 4 Jun Martin Bialasinski wrote

>I have tracked down the cause of the problems which were reported about
>irqtune.
>
>Apparently hwtools does not contain the most recent version of irqtune.
>
>Using irqtune 0.5 will solve your problems.
>
>I have addressed the package maintainer about this.
>
>Two solutions:
>
>1. Wait for the new hwtools package.
>
>2. Get the irqtune 0.5 from the website.
>   You don't have to recompile, just copy irqtune_mod.o and irqtune
>   from the tar to /sbin . Then change the invocation of
>   irqtune in /etc/rc.boot/hwtools from
>   irqtune
>   to
>   /sbin/irqtune

Regards,

Curt

C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: FIXED POST: Two problems after upgrade to Debian 1.3

1997-06-04 Thread Curtis L. Daugaard
On 3 Jun, Martin Bialasinski wrote:

>On  3 Jun, Curtis L. Daugaard wrote:
> 
>> 1) Irqtune was working for me under v.1.2, but though my configured
>> hardware is the same I now get an error message.  Here is the 
message at
>> boot time:
>> 
>> " irqtune: setting system IRQ priority to 3/14
>>   irqtune: insmod failed on '/usr/lib/hwtools/irqtune_mod.o' "
>> 
 

>irqtune is compiled to work with any kernelversion (great work).
>I had the same errors, so I tracked it down with the developers. The
>result was that modutils 2.1.23 had a bug. After upgrading to 2.1.34-5
>everthing worked fine.
>
>What actually happend was that insmod dumped core when trying to load
>irqtune_mod.o leaving it half configured.
>
>Just update modutils and everthing will work as expected.


Thanks for your post.  Unfortunately upon checking I find that I already have
modutils 2.1.34-5 installed.

Best regards,
Curt

C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


FIXED POST: Two problems after upgrade to Debian 1.3

1997-06-03 Thread Curtis L. Daugaard
My apologies to the debian-user list for my faulty original post.  I had
just installed Netscape 4.0 and forgot to disable HTML in its mail
package (which is enabled by default).  Let me try again.

Can someone enlighten me on the following, which I can't seem to solve
with the available documentation?

1) Irqtune was working for me under v.1.2, but though my configured
hardware is the same I now get an error message.  Here is the message at
boot time:

" irqtune: setting system IRQ priority to 3/14
  irqtune: insmod failed on '/usr/lib/hwtools/irqtune_mod.o' "

Should I ignore the second message and assume the priority has been
set?  (Netscape does crash now and then, one of the symptoms irqtune is
said to address.)

2) The second problem concerning syslogd hanging has been solved in a
posted response to my original defective post.

Thanks again.

Curt

C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Two problems after upgrade to Debian 1.3

1997-06-02 Thread Curtis L. Daugaard

Can someone enlighten me on two problems?  I can't  seem to solve
them with the available documentation

1) Irqtune was working for me under v.1.2, but though my configured
hardware is the same I now get an error message.  Here is the message
at boot time:

"  irqtune: setting system IRQ priority to 3/14
   irqtune: insmod failed on '/usr/lib/hwtools/irqtune_mod.o' 
"

Should I ignore the second message and assume the priority has been
set?  (Netscape does crash now and then.)

2) On boot up when syslogd starts it hangs for about 8 to 10 seconds. 
Not a problem I guess, but it didn'tused to do it.

My thanks to anyone who can help.

Curt

C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___






--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: gpm, X-Windows, MS Serial mouse

1997-03-24 Thread Curtis L. Daugaard
My thanks to several of you who responded to my post.  You all corrected
my mistake of thinking I could not specify the (preferred) /dev/ttySx in
both gpm and the X-server.

After correcting the config and rebooting I'm able to start and restart
X without killing gpm.

Regards,

-- 

C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__


gpm, X-Windows, MS Serial mouse

1997-03-23 Thread Curtis L. Daugaard
Before I changed to Debian, I could swear that under Slackware I was
able to use my MS serial mouse in X-Windows without first killing gpm. 
No more.  X refuses to start, complaining "device in use."

I've tried everything I can think of based on the documentation for gpm,
including invoking the -M option and pointing the XF86Config file
to /dev/gpmdata.

My current serial settings: gpm set to /dev/cua2 and XF86Config to
/dev/ttyS2.

Can anybody tell me the secret?

Thanks. 


C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__