Re: Disable ipv6.......
On 02/01/14 04:08, Charlie wrote: Apologies, let me say this before I resend it: Running Jessie: 3.11-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.11.10-1 (2013-12-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux Toshiba c500/A00L w8 laptop Another thing I would like to do is to disable ipv6 on this system as satellite doesn't use ipv6 Without doing ifdown eth0 to see if I was using ipv6, I did: # rmmod ipv6 libkmod: ERROR ../libkmod/libkmod-module.c:1802 kmod_module_get_holders: could not open '/sys/module/ipv6/holders': No such file or directory Error: Module ipv6 is in use So there is ipv6 in use. How can I disable it and if someone knows, how can that enabled again should I want to do so? Thank you, Charlie -- Registered Linux User:- 329524 *** Art is merely the refuge which the ingenious have invented, when they were supplied with food and women, to escape the tediousness of life. .W. Somerset Maugham *** Debian GNU/Linux - just the best way to create magic - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52c5820d.3070...@uncu.edu.ar
Re: Lenovo WiFi Problem
Sorry, sent to private mail. I re-send to the list: What model is your wireless card? We need know your hardware to help you. Regards El Jueves, 13 de Junio de 2013 19.27 CLT, Doug Button Ha escrito: I have been having a WiFi problem for a few months now, and I think I should finally fix it. I am using a Lenovo Ideapad Z370 with Gnome 3's network manager. Whenever I connect to a WiFi network, I have one or more of these three problems. 1. The speed of the network drops drastically. Usually less than 20% of the speed that the network should be. 2. The network seems to work fine for several minutes then drops out for 30 seconds to two minutes until it finally starts working again. This repeats itself. 3. I am repeatedly asked for the password for the network and cannot access the internet at all. I know for a fact that the password I am entering is correct. In all of these problems network manager says that I am connected to the network just fine which is obviously not the case. I can also say that this probably isn't a hardware problem or a matter of range because Windows 7 seems to connect just fine. Does anybody know how to fix this problem? I can post any log files that may be needed. Thanks for any help in advance! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51bb09f6.7040...@uncu.edu.ar
Re: Lenovo WiFi Problem
On 14/06/13 00:02, Doug Button wrote: Thanks for the help, but it doesn't sound quite like my problem. I haven't changed any network settings and these problems are only occurring on this one device. I should probably also mention that according to lspci my WiFi model is "Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 1000 [Condor Peak]". Maybe I'm missing a driver or something of that sort? See: http://wiki.debian.org/iwlwifi http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/iwlwifi What module are you using? What is the output of lsmod? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51bb0bc2.4080...@uncu.edu.ar
Re: OT: pam_unix(dovecot:auth): authentication failure.
On 24/01/13 14:31, Sthu Deus wrote: Good time of the day. Excuse me for off-topic. Could You please comment this auth. failure: localhost auth: pam_unix(dovecot:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=dovecot ruser=null rhost=91.201.64.249 ? As I understand this - one tried to login to dovecot - but dovecot was What do you mean for "dovecot". Dovecot manages various services: 110 POP 143 IMAP 2000 or 4190 MANAGESIEVE Do you are sure you blocked all dovecot ports? Can you make a scan port to your host and verify that your firewall works as you expected? If you saved the logs, then you also have the dovecot logs in mail.log, did you find the entry that correspond with this line in auth.log? Then you can know to what dovecot process the "attacker" connected. closed by firewall from that IP, or it was tried from local side and therefore I have a security issue inside of my system? Thank You for Your time. Sthu. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51067d13.8050...@uncu.edu.ar
Re: Tools to retrieve images from dead hard drive and/or deleted partitions
On 27/12/12 18:17, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and deleted partitions are different things, I know that. Let me explain "my" (they are, in fact, friend's problems) two problems (from different peoples). === 0) the common part. By the past, I've did some researches about forensics (just as an amateur) and learned that you mostly work on copies of media from which you are trying to recover data. But the 2 HD from which I need to recover images (mostly jpeg, I guess. The users only said that's photos, ignoring, and does not willing to know, everything about format - but if that was not computer stuff, they would have know what they've used... - ) are bigger than all my current disks ! One is 500Gb, the other is 1Tb, where mine are mostly a bunch of 40/80Gb + 1 or 2 of 250Gb. 1) I have a hard disk (1Tb, the bigger) which gave me many errors when I am trying to read it. It makes it very slow to even read, but I've been able to determine that it contains jpg images with a classic file browser. I did not managed to copy any data on a safer place... I am feared I will not even be able to retrieve one photo with my conventional hardware... but maybe some of you will have an idea? 2) I have an external hard disk which is readable without troubles. But partitions were probably destroyed, AFAIK. The user knows (as usual) nothing about what happened, so I do not even know if the partition system have been remade, or if it is simply a problem like "format c:". There are 2 partitions: _ 1: the smaller, some Gb only IIRC, which was of type FAT when I looked (or was it FAT32? Is it is very different?) _ 2: the bigger, and not a little, from my memory, it takes at least 80% of the whole disk, which is NTFS, I guess most data is there. === So, do someone have faced one of those problems, and come to a solution? Of course, I've said to their owners that keeping data on only one HD is suicidal, I've said that they can probably pay big amounts of money to specialized establishments to have them back, and have kept their hardware for some months (without using them), as a sanction (well, I tried at some times to take an eye, but had other things to do). But, now, I'm in holidays, Christmas passed, and I'm thinking that could be an interesting gift to give back to people their photos of children and drunken nights, and I hope someone here could help me to do that for them :) I've big fears that the owner of (1) will have no other choice that asking to people with dedicated hardware, but I ask in case... for (2), I've more hopes, IF the user stopped the destructive process before the disk was fully erased, but I'll need the good tools. You can also try foremost. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50ddab64.1010...@uncu.edu.ar
Re: APC SMT1000RMI2U and apcupsd ?
On 11/12/12 09:50, Berni Elbourn wrote: This is a 2U rack mount SmartUPS 1000 .. can anyone here confirm SMT1000RMI2U works with apscupsd on Debian? Cheers, Berni If your SmartUPS include a management card with network connection, then supports PowerChute protocol, you can connect ApcUpsd with your UPS through the network Regards Federico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50c72d96.4080...@uncu.edu.ar
Re: raid recomendation
On 06/12/12 13:18, Roberto Scattini wrote: hi, i have a new dell r720 server with 5 600gb disks. his function will be a postgresql server (the size of the databases is really small with 600gb we should be fine for a long time). which raid configuration would you recommend? i was thinking in raid 5 with all five disks but i am not a expert. i prefer redundandcy against size (i mean, i can sacrifice space). and i dont want performance degradation for doing raid with an incorrect number of disks. thanks in advance! -- Roberto Scattini If you want performance and redundancy at cost to reduce your storage capacity think in RAID 10. Regards Federico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50c0d39a.2030...@uncu.edu.ar
Re: exchange like alternative
On 05/12/12 00:50, s0lid wrote: Hi, Im not sure if this was discussed before but is there an application that is like microsoft exchange(Mail, Calendar, and contacts). The whole suite not just the mail server. TIA Do you know SOGo[1] (Scalable Open Groupware)? SOGo provides mail, addressbook, and calendar and reuses your infraestructure (mail server, ldap or database, imap server), also use a database for store calendars and task. The builtin web interface is proxied behind a web server (Apache or Nginx) and supports a wide variety of clientes (Thunderbird with Lightning using two aditional extensions) and in the version 2.0 (using openchange) add native support to Outlook/Exchange MAPI protocol to access SOGo groupware without using connectors. As its name tells SOGo is scalable, you can distribute your users across mutiples db's with multiple SOGo backends. Native acces to calendar through iphone also is possible and using Funambol in other mobile devices. Unlike Zimbra that is too monolithic, SOGo is modular and reuse your mail and authentication infraestructure. SOGo provides packages for Debian Squeeze and Wheezy Regards, Federico [1] http://www.sogo.nu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bf6d90.4050...@uncu.edu.ar
Re: e2fsck errror: Error reading block (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read)
On 28/08/12 10:28, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: When I ran $sudo e2fsck -c -c -f -v /dev/sdb7 I am getting a lot of errors such as Error reading block 18022401 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read) while reading inode and block bitmaps. Ignore error? yes Force rewrite? yes Error reading block 19562497 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read) while reading inode and block bitmaps. Ignore error? yes Force rewrite? yes Error reading block 19824640 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read) while reading inode and block bitmaps. Ignore error? yes Force rewrite? yes Error reading block 19824641 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read) while reading inode and block bitmaps. Ignore error? yes Force rewrite? yes 1) Does this mean there are badblocks on my hard drive? 2) Am I correct in choosing "yes" to both these questions or is there a better way? 3) Is the drive going bad and need to be replaced? 4) What might have caused this problem and how to prevent it in the future? 5) Is the filesystem on this partition corrupted? thanks raju Did you try to diagnose your hardrive with smartmontools? Smartmontools uses S.M.A.R.T.[1] technology included in harddrives, and displays info about predictable failures, time of use, etc. Regards [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503cc9ed.4090...@uncu.edu.ar
Re: Samba 4 on Debian Wheezy
On 24/08/12 13:03, Camaleón wrote: On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:52:38 -0300, Federico Alberto Sayd wrote: Anyone has tried to implement samba4 in Debian Wheezy? (...) I am investigating this new version that provides Active Directory functionality. I have installed the samba4 packages and provisioned samba using debconf. Samba 4 starts but when I test the instalation accord to the official howto: smbclient -L localhost -U% I get this error: Failed to connect to ncacn_np:localhost - NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY REWRITE: list servers not implemented The howto says that this error is solved deleting the file /var/run/smbd-fileserver.conf.pid However, Debian ships Samba 4 with their files in a different location. Debian writes a file /var/run/samba.pid. I think that this "samba.pid" is the same smbd-fileserver.conf.pid from howto, but I am not sure. Anyone that knows more about the official samba 4 packages? Any hint? As we've been commenting the past days in the Spanish mailing list, samba4 status is still beta and very experimental, so errors are expected. Hi Camaleón I am the same that posted in the Spanish mailing list Anyway, there's a bug report in Debian BTS where the error you get is also listed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679678#10 Can't comment any further whether this has been solved or not yet :-? Thanks, I suspect that is a problem related to the abscence of the file server smbd in the samba4 packages because this conflicts with the smbd file server of samba3 package [1] Greetings, Greetings Federico [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg103250.html https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/s3fs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503b8094.5010...@uncu.edu.ar
Re: Windows 2003 AD to Samba4 Migration
On 27/08/12 02:54, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: any help please? On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i wanted to migrate Windows 2003 AD to Samba For DC with out rejoining the clients and down time.Such as Additional Domain Controller actually, i am Planning migrating my microsoft infrastructure to linux gradually. i successfully migrated Fileserver, Virtualization, Proxy. now my goal is to replace my domain controller holding 2003 server. i have a mix client (33 nodes) infrastructure including, WindowXP, 2003 Memeber server and Windows 7 while all are memeber of domain with default GPO, though i wanted to use GPOs in future via samba4, here is the detail of my domain controller, 1. 2003 Active directory 2. active directory integrated DNS with DNS forwarder. 3. DHCP. so my questions are. As per my understanding with DC . i can use ADC for failover. - is it possible to install samba DC as an ADC and later promoted to DC? - is there any one has migrated windows DC to SAMBA DC. what was his/her strategy/experience (any suggestions would be appreciated). - can anyone please tell me about the stability of SAMBA4. with his personal experience , since it is in beta stage? because my 2003 DC server is in production and i don't have a clue that beta is a better way to go in production or not. my requirement with samba4 after migration are. 1. DC 2. Integrated DNS so that when ever host join's. DNS records and other updates in AD should be done by it self. (same ad windows AD) 3. DHCP 4. Group policy implementation. BTW, i am using 2.7 SAMBA as file sharing server integrated with 2003 AD. so is it going to effect the migration or not? or samba 2.7 with consider SAMBA4 machine as an old DC. Thanks, Hello: I'm also interested in deploying samba4. My plan is to build a testing environment and then proceed with a possible migration. Searching I found that samba4 from debian packages contains some differences with the official samba distribution. Originally samba4's team developed a replacement of the file server of samba3 called ntvfs. But later they decided to continue to use samba3 file server (smbd). But Debian don't ship samba4 with samba3 fileserver (smbd) because this conflicts with smbd of samba3 package. Samba developers recommends to reactivate ntvfs[1]. For now this is the only issue that I found with samba4 on Wheezy. Greetings Federico [1]http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg103250.html http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679678#32 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503b767f.2050...@uncu.edu.ar
Samba 4 on Debian Wheezy
Hello: I am new to the list, and I speak a little english. Anyone has tried to implement samba4 in Debian Wheezy? Samba 4 was included in the frozen packages for stable. Although Samba 4 is a beta version, the samba official site encourage to test the new version to familiarice with it and report bugs. I am investigating this new version that provides Active Directory functionality. I have installed the samba4 packages and provisioned samba using debconf. Samba 4 starts but when I test the instalation accord to the official howto: smbclient -L localhost -U% I get this error: Failed to connect to ncacn_np:localhost - NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY REWRITE: list servers not implemented The howto says that this error is solved deleting the file /var/run/smbd-fileserver.conf.pid However, Debian ships Samba 4 with their files in a different location. Debian writes a file /var/run/samba.pid. I think that this "samba.pid" is the same smbd-fileserver.conf.pid from howto, but I am not sure. Anyone that knows more about the official samba 4 packages? Any hint? Thanks Federico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503643b6.30...@uncu.edu.ar
