Re: Re: convert multiple jpegs to one pdf file

2009-07-04 Thread Jeff Chimene
On 12/23/-28158 12:59 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
 On Sun,05.Jul.09, 01:29:26, ronggui wong wrote:
 Hi all,
 Can you recommend a software to convert multiple jpeg files to one pdf
 file? I found a which works under windows only, or can only convert
 one jpeg to one pdf file.
 
 But there are other utilities to merge single pdfs into one. I *think* 
 it was pdftk, but a simple google will surely find it for you.
 
 Regards,
 Andrei

You might also use Google Docs or Open Office to create a document, then
export it as PDF


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Need help with Mail::Sender

2009-06-26 Thread Jeff Chimene

I don't see glaringly wrong with it off the top of my head.

You might try some things:

   * Split the 'content_id' value into its own parameter
   * Let Mail::Sender supply the boundary parameter
   * Employ the 'debug' parameter in the object create call  write a log

I've been using Mail::Sender for  7 yrs  found it quite bullet-proof. 
I do recall that it was a bitch to get everything working. I use it to 
send attachments as well as inline images



ref $sender-Attach({description = $description
 , 
ctype = 'image/jpeg'
 , 
encoding = 'base64'
 , 
disposition = sprintf('inline;filename=%s/%s;', $path[$#path - 1], 
$path[$#path])
 , 
file = $imagepath.$path[$#path]
 , 
content_id = $k}) or die Cannot send file as a separate part of mail 
message: $Mail::Sender::Error;



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Re: kde4: restore deleted desktop containment

2009-06-12 Thread Jeff Chimene

On 12/23/-28158 12:59 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:

Inloom.20090612t045157-...@post.gmane.org, DZ wrote:
   

Jeff Chimenejchimeneat  gmail.com  writes:
 

Andrei Popescu wrote:
   

Jeff Chimene wrote:
 

While futzing w/ KDE 4, I deleted the desktop containment. How do I
restore the desktop containment? Google is not very revealing on this
topic.
   

What's do you mean by 'containment'?
 

One would have to ask the KDE wizards. That's what it's called.
   

Right-click in desktop area; choose Appearance Settings.
Then, under Desktop Activity -  Type -  Desktop.
Next, right-click on desktop area again; choose Add Widgets.
Add Folder View.
In the newly appeared Folder Area,
right-click Under Folder View Settings,
choose Show the Desktop folder
 


If these steps work for you, then you aren't talking about a containment.
You are talking about a widget or a plasmoid.
   


Boyd,

Do you run KDE 4?

If you do, then please follow these oh-so-easy steps:

   1. Right mouseclick on the desktop
   2. Select Appearance Settings
   3. Select the Type drop-down menu in the Desktop Activity group
   4. Note the captions for each of the two selections
   5. Post the caption for Desktop Better yet, grab a screenshot at
   step 4 and post it to the list

Did you answer the original question when I posted it a few weeks ago? 
Sure you did! I knew you could!


Thanks again to the kind person who finally answered the question.

To you, Boyd, thanks for being the typical Debianite


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Re: Google Chrome

2009-06-11 Thread Jeff Chimene

On 12/23/-28158 12:59 PM, ghe wrote:
div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family: -moz-fixedOn 
6/11/09 1:45 PM, David Baron wrote:


The Google Chromium Browser is working on my Debian box. Very quick, 
works

certainly better the kde4 konqueror. Flash not yet implemented.


That's OK. It won't run Flashblock anyway :-)


There is a .deb package.


Linkie?? I tried to get it, and the Linux package I found certainly 
wasn't a .deb. I couldn't figure it out...



http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-linux/17302/chrome-linux.zip
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-linux/

Unzip to your favorite directory.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Re: kde4: restore deleted desktop containment

2009-05-21 Thread Jeff Chimene

On 12/23/-28158 12:59 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family: -moz-fixedJeff 
Chimene wrote:

On 12/23/-28158 12:59 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:

On Wed,20.May.09, 12:34:01, Jeff Chimene wrote:

Hi,

While futzing w/ KDE 4, I deleted the desktop containment. How do I
restore the desktop containment? Google is not very revealing on this
topic.


What's do you mean by 'containment'?


One would have to ask the KDE wizards. That's what it's called.

Assuming that one starts at the standard kde4 desktop:
o Right-click on the desktop
o Select appearance settings
o Select desktop in desktop activity; the description for which 
is default desktop containment. 


Hi Jeff,

I get this far and don't see any pop out menu.


Sorry, I omitted the last step: mouseover the (now visible) desktop 
window; which event should cause the pop-out action. I may be wrong in 
the actions required to raise the pop-out window: the window isn't 
visible, natch.


After clicking X on the containment's pop-out menu, the containment 
disappears. I was able to restore the default desktop environment by 
renaming .kde to .kde-save. 


That sounds similar to what I had to do when I did the update to KDE 
4.2 at the same time as the upgrade to X 7.4 and all kinds of things 
broke.


To be fair: the Debianization of KDE4.4 seems well-thought-out, But for 
certain settings that don't have an analog in KDE4 (textured 
wallpaper?), the migration to KDE4 from KDE3 was smooth. I didn't 
realize the depth of the migration until after renaming the .kde 
directory, some migrated properties I took for granted were (obviously) 
lost.


Paul Scott



Needless to say, this is a bit like reinstall windows to
remove all virii



/div



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




kde4: restore deleted desktop containment

2009-05-20 Thread Jeff Chimene

Hi,

While futzing w/ KDE 4, I deleted the desktop containment. How do I 
restore the desktop containment? Google is not very revealing on this topic.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: kde4: restore deleted desktop containment

2009-05-20 Thread Jeff Chimene

On 12/23/-28158 12:59 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:

On Wed,20.May.09, 12:34:01, Jeff Chimene wrote:
   

Hi,

While futzing w/ KDE 4, I deleted the desktop containment. How do I
restore the desktop containment? Google is not very revealing on this
topic.
 


What's do you mean by 'containment'?
   


One would have to ask the KDE wizards. That's what it's called.

Assuming that one starts at the standard kde4 desktop:
o Right-click on the desktop
o Select appearance settings
o Select desktop in desktop activity; the description for which is 
default desktop containment. After clicking X on the containment's 
pop-out menu, the containment disappears. I was able to restore the 
default desktop environment by renaming .kde to .kde-save. Needless to 
say, this is a bit like reinstall windows to

remove all virii


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Re: mysterious pdf file won't be printed, all others will!

2009-04-21 Thread Jeff Chimene
 In my sister's home directory there is a pdf file that won't respond 
to the `lp' command. All others pdf files in the same directory behave 
all right, and the permissions are the  same. The only difference is 
the creation date, which is today wheras the other files are older. The 
thing looks mysterious to me.



 Can anybody suggest any explanation/remedy?


ISTR that PDF files can be locked against printing. Perhaps that's the case?




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




HOWTO Make XEmacs switch to buffer

2009-04-14 Thread Jeff Chimene

Hi,

This used to be not a problem. Since some upgrade, XEmacs (testing) no 
longer switches to the first non-scratch buffer.


Would someone please provide the incantation that I can add to my init 
file that switches to the first non-scratch buffer?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Suggestions for multilevel backup of single machine?

2009-04-11 Thread Jeff Chimene

On 12/23/-28158 12:59 PM, James Youngman wrote:

Here's my current backup arrangement:

Data is stored in filesystems on LVM volumes over RAID1.  While RAID1
presents some protection from disk failure, it gives no protection
against data corruption due to flaky hardware or data loss caused by
fire or theft.

Therefore I have an offsite backup arrangement.   This consists of two
rsync backups.  One backup goes to a local disk (different disk
manufacturer, different disk controller) and the other rsync backup is
to a disk at work.  This works a bit but the outgoing bandwidth on my
cable connection is low (about 0.3 Mbps).  If I make a large change to
the machine (e.g. dist-upgrade) I physically swap the home and work
backup disks (this is the main reason for keeping the local backup
too).  This at least allows me to place an upper limit on the amount
of data I would lose in the case of (e.g.) a fire.

However, there are two respects in which I think some improvement
would be useful:

(1) Quite a lot of the files on my system are files I never expect to
change again.  I plan to write a few scripts which will tell me if a
file that hadn't been modified in, say, two years was in fact recently
modified.  This could give me early warning that the disk controller
has gone berserk (again).
   


Isn't this what the file alteration monitor is for?


(2) It would be useful to have a historic backup capability too (e.g.
the way the filesystem looked yesterday, last week, last month and a
year ago), at least for filesystems like /home.
   
I think it's extreme going back farther than a month. A 
grandfather/father/son scheme tailored to your requirements should be 
more than sufficient. But, it's your system...

What are good solutions for doing (2)?   (Please only recommend
software you're using yourself :)

   
I like backup-manager for SOHO backups. I've been through duplicity, 
backup-ninja and possibly others. Once I resolved A REALLY ANNOYING BUG, 
it works very well. I, too, do offsite backups (via scp). backup-manager 
fails gracefully (I changed the sshd port thus defeating 
backup-manager's ability to successfully connect via scp. This only left 
the backup on the local machine waiting to be copied to the remote 
machine once I updated the configuration). I also like that the email 
logs contain enough, but not too much info.


On the downside, I don't think backup-manager has a calendar of 
sufficient duration to handle your last month, year ago requirement. 
You may have to solve that via cron.


You should be prepared to try several of the available backup packages 
and decide for yourself. You're obviously the type who likes to be 
fer-sure, fer-sure.


Cheers,


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Debian's glacial movement--a rant

2009-04-06 Thread Jeff Chimene

On 12/23/-28158 12:59 PM, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I've never been pissed off at Debian before but I guess there is 
always a first.


I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucash that appeared a couple of days ago 
on my system that makes Gnucash completely unusable for me.  I turned 
in a bug report on Friday, checked on it yesterday, and by today the 
bug had been blocked from being displayed.  It could be found by 
searching Debian's bug tracker, but only if you know the bug id 
number.   If you just search for bugs in Gnucash the bug does not 
appear to exist.


The bug was closed, and blocked, because it's been fixed upstream in 
version 2.2.9 which was released by Gnucash in February of this year.
Great.   The bug has been fixed.   Why it needed to be hidden from 
being displayed is puzzler for me, but that's the way it is.


Now the bad news.

Since Gnucash in both Sid and Sqeeze is now at version 2.2.6 I only 
have to wait until Debian works through versions 2.2.7 and 2.2.8 
before Gnucash in Debian finally becomes usable for me again in 
version 2.2.9.   As Sid is only 9 months behind Gnucash's release 
schedule at this point I guess the fact that all my business records 
for the last couple of years are in Gnucash means I'll be able to 
start doing my business accounting again sometime after the first of 
next year, at a minimum, if I wait for Debian
I have no idea about the requirements for GC, but that doesn't prevent 
me from expressing an opinion!


For this reason, I rarely rely on Debianized versions of packages 
important to my personal productivity. For example, Firefox, Java, 
OpenOffice, Eclipse, Google Web Toolkit, Thunderbird are all installed 
from their respective sites. I consider it an important aspect of Debian 
that I can install into /usr/local and not trash the distro. That 
doesn't always work (certain Perl modules come to mind).


How about installing it independently of Debian? However, from a quick 
scan of the site (gnucash.org), it looks like there's only a Windows binary.


Is compiling from source a no-go? In certain cases, I've had to wait for 
a Debianized version. e.g. Task Juggler went to the lastest gcc before 
Debian. If GC is using a gcc version that's not in your current Debian 
sources list, there may be an issue.


Oh - and flames from Debian fanbois?  dev/null



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Please brainstorm: Word-processor compatible with version control

2009-02-25 Thread Jeff Chimene

Flashbake: Free version-control for writers using git
Posted by Cory Doctorow, February 13, 2009 6:39 AM | permalink
For the past couple weeks, I've been working with Thomas cmdln Gideon 
(host of the fabulously nerdy Command Line podcast) on a free software 
project for writers called Flashbake (which is to say, I described 
what I wanted and Thomas wrote the code). This is a set of Python 
scripts that check your hot files for changes every 15 minutes, and 
checks in any changed files to a local git repository. Git is a free 
source control program used by programmers to track changes to 
source-code, but it works equally well on any text file. If you write in 
a text-editor like I do, then Flashbake can keep track of your changes 
for you as you go.


http://www.boingboing.net/2009/02/13/flashbake-free-versi.html


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




XDebug on debian

2009-02-11 Thread Jeff Chimene

Hi,

Has anyone managed to get XDebug working on Debian w/ Apache? I'm 
looking for some assistance in getting this to work w/ Eclipse and an 
external browser.


tia,
jec


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Re: What does support mean? (Re: Exim4 with a Goddady account)

2009-01-31 Thread Jeff Chimene

On 12/23/42 12:59, Nate Bargmann wrote:

* Jerry Stucklejstuc...@attglobal.net  [2009 Jan 31 07:34 -0600]:

   

A bit late, but I've been unavailable.

When I need help configuring Exim, I look at the Exim mailing lists -
just like I do any product.
 


In the README.Debian file it quite explicitly discusses that support
should be sought on the Debian list first and only afterward should the
upstream Exim list be consulted.  This is likely due to the Debian
configuration changes that have been made to the package.  Since I
wound up solving my configuration entirely within the framework of the
Debian configuration, asking on a Debian list was the proper avenue to
take, IMO.

For the record, I checked the Debian Exim4 mailing list and it appeared
to have very low traffic and since I am already subscribed here, I
asked here.

   

I don't expect this to be a product support list.
 


There seems to be a lot of product support that takes place on this
list without issue.  Why some got upset about this thread is puzzling
to me.

- Nate

   

Hi,

What was the solution?

I'm interested in getting Exim4 to talk to a smarthost provider. TBird 
seems to have no problem, but Exim4 provokes an unexpected error.




exim4 as a client of a smarthost w/o TLS

2009-01-29 Thread Jeff Chimene

Hi,

I've been trying to get exim to send mail via a smarthost that doesn't 
use TLS. I've set the AUTH_CLIENT_ALLOW_NOTLS_PASSWORDS = 1 to no avail: 
exim4 does not fall back to AUTH LOGIN or AUTH PLAIN.


I can get exim4 to send mail via mail.gmail.com

Any help would be appreciated.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: s2disk weird error

2009-01-13 Thread Jeff Chimene

In case anybody's interested: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/30/573


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




backup-manager fails to SCP

2009-01-03 Thread Jeff Chimene
Hi,

Is there a bash or ssh configuration that inhibits ssh sessions from bash
scripts?

I'm trying to debug a problem with backup-manager-upload (0.7.7-debian1)
using the scp mode.

When I run the program interactively, it works. When run as part of
backup-manager, it fails. Looking at the logs on the remote side, I never
see a connection attempt during a failure. There are several connection
attempts when run interactively.

The command line is as follows (captured via set -x):
/usr/bin/backup-manager-upload \
-k=/backup/.ssh/id_rsa \
--ssh-purge \
-m=scp \
-h=example.com \
-u=root \
-d=backups \
-r=/backup/backups \
today


s2disk weird error

2008-10-01 Thread Jeff Chimene
Hi,

I'm tracking Lenny on 2.6.26-1-amd64.
The command powersave -U is now failing, and the following error is in
/var/log/messages:
ioctl32(s2disk:4094): Unknown cmd fd(4) cmd(4004330a){t:'3';sz:4}
arg(1605) on /dev/snapshot

Should I file a bug or is this a known issue?

tia,
jec


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



perl cpan cc: command not found

2007-03-17 Thread Jeff Chimene

Hi,

While running cpan certain modules don't get built.
   sh: cc: command not found

I know this isn't true:

ls /usr/bin/gcc -lat
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 May 22  2006 /usr/bin/gcc - /etc/alternatives/gcc

I'm wondering if the debian-alternatives system is interfering here?

I've tried
   alias cc=gcc

in /root/.bashrc but no joy

CPAN seems my only alternative to keeping up w/ Catalyst developments. 
Updates aren't moving to Debian, and I had /significant/ problems

installing Catalyst from the Debian version.

How do others manage Debian vs. CPAN?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: perl cpan cc: command not found

2007-03-17 Thread Jeff Chimene

Jeff Chimene wrote:

Hi,

While running cpan certain modules don't get built.
   sh: cc: command not found

I know this isn't true:

ls /usr/bin/gcc -lat
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 May 22  2006 /usr/bin/gcc - 
/etc/alternatives/gcc


I'm wondering if the debian-alternatives system is interfering here?

I've tried
   alias cc=gcc

I figured it out. update /etc/perl/CPAN/Config.pm
   'make_arg' = q[CC=/usr/bin/gcc LD=/usr/bin/gcc]

This works w/ debian-alternatives. I think it's also possible to add the 
cc command using debian-alternatives.

in /root/.bashrc but no joy

CPAN seems my only alternative to keeping up w/ Catalyst developments. 
Updates aren't moving to Debian, and I had /significant/ problems

installing Catalyst from the Debian version.

How do others manage Debian vs. CPAN?




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




How to restore files without deleting existing

2004-10-03 Thread Jeff Chimene
Hi,

I'm trying to resolve a tar restore issue. Using the
newest gnu tar.

While using tar to deploy software, today I wiped
clean my destination directory. This was somewhat of a
surprise. The only files left in the destination were
those present in the source archive.

The destination directory is a symlink - could this
cause the existing files to be silently erased?

I hadn't seen this behavior under the orginal Solaris
host system. At that time, I went from Debian Linux to
Solaris (unknown vintage). The new sequence is Debian
Linux to Red Hat Linux.

In both environments, I create the archive as tar -czf
archive.tar.gz source/
Under Solaris I restored using a command like gzip
archive.tar.gz | tar df -

In the new environment I thought I could just tar -xzf
archive.tar.gz Apparently, this isn't the case...

Thanks for your help,
Jeff Chimene



___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to restore files without deleting existing

2004-10-03 Thread Jeff Chimene

--- Rajesh Menon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 As far as I know, if you operate on the symlink, you
 are operating on 
 the files/dir that it points to. Unlike hard links,
 which are actual 
 copies of the link pointed to.
 And if I recall right, tar's behaviour, by default,
 is to over-write the 
 destination.
 
 tar -xzf archive.tar.gz = it's going to create
 (overwrite) a folder 'source' and dump the output in
 there.

Thank you for the reply! I think that I clobbered the
symlink - i.e. the original files are in the original
directory. The symlink got replaced by the actual
directory.

Is there a way for tar to follow the symlink, or am I
supposed to be writing into the linked directory?

Cheers,
Jeff Chimene

 
 Jeff Chimene wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm trying to resolve a tar restore issue. Using
 the
 newest gnu tar.
 
 While using tar to deploy software, today I wiped
 clean my destination directory. This was somewhat
 of a
 surprise. The only files left in the destination
 were
 those present in the source archive.
 
 The destination directory is a symlink - could this
 cause the existing files to be silently erased?
 
 I hadn't seen this behavior under the orginal
 Solaris
 host system. At that time, I went from Debian Linux
 to
 Solaris (unknown vintage). The new sequence is
 Debian
 Linux to Red Hat Linux.
 
 In both environments, I create the archive as tar
 -czf
 archive.tar.gz source/
 Under Solaris I restored using a command like gzip
 archive.tar.gz | tar df -
 
 In the new environment I thought I could just tar
 -xzf
 archive.tar.gz Apparently, this isn't the case...
 
 Thanks for your help,
 Jeff Chimene
 
 
  
 ___
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
 http://vote.yahoo.com
 
 
   
 
 




___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to restore files without deleting existing

2004-10-03 Thread Jeff Chimene

--- Paul E Condon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 07:33:04PM -0700, Jeff
 Chimene wrote:
  
  --- Rajesh Menon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   As far as I know, if you operate on the symlink,
 you
   are operating on 
   the files/dir that it points to. Unlike hard
 links,
   which are actual 
   copies of the link pointed to.
   And if I recall right, tar's behaviour, by
 default,
   is to over-write the 
   destination.
   
   tar -xzf archive.tar.gz = it's going to create
   (overwrite) a folder 'source' and dump the
 output in
   there.
  
  Thank you for the reply! I think that I clobbered
 the
  symlink - i.e. the original files are in the
 original
  directory. The symlink got replaced by the actual
  directory.
  
  Is there a way for tar to follow the symlink, or
 am I
  supposed to be writing into the linked directory?
  
  Cheers,
  Jeff Chimene
  
 
 In my test, I used -h option only for creating .tgz
 file
 My untar did -not- have -h option and yet the files
 that
 were in the .tgz file were placed by following the
 symlink.
 I appears that you only need -h when you are
 creating.
 So, this is not likely explanation of what happened
 to you.
 
 But, again, maybe Red Hat tar behaves differently.

Hi,

bash-2.05b$ tar --version 
tar (GNU tar) 1.13.25
Copyright (C) 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

It's got something to do with following symlinks in a
secure way. I found a thread that seemed to indicate
that this behavior is more secure than previous
symlink handling. I didn't follow the thread closely,
but I think that's the gist of this class of behavior.

Fortunately, I have the original files :)

So, I will modify my restore process to write to the
actual directory, rather than the symlink. That should
yield the desired behavior.

Peace,
jec
 
 -- 
 Paul E Condon   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Netscape 4.7 failing dns lookup

2002-06-11 Thread Jeff Chimene

Hi:

Cross-posted on debian-alpha, debian-user

On Debian 2, Netscape 4.7, Netscape is failing to locate any non-local url. 
NS freezes
when it goes to retrieve the site, be it email, newsgroups or http. I 
notice that I'm getting
two dns-helper processes. Other than that, I have no clues. ppp is normal, 
and lynx is

working.

Last upgrades were from all from Stable: gforth  java-common. Several days 
ago I upgraded ppp,

but I've used NS since then.

Any clues appreciated.

jec 




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-12-03 Thread Jeff . Chimene



Some of you obviously "get it." My hats off to 
you!Others, sadly, do not:

  -Original 
  Message-From: Dimitri Maziuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 17:53To: 
  debian-user@lists.debian.orgSubject: Re: Thoughts on RTFMGood. I 
  sincerely hope it'll stay there -- the last thing I want in my mailbox is 
  mail from lusers who need a dancing paper clip to tell them how to 
  insert a CD in the drive.
The last thing I do is let people like 
you define people like me.

  Definitely. If you 
  found DeadRat too hard, Debian is not for you. Maybe Linux is not for you. You 
  know, there's Mac Oh-SeX, several *BSDs, a bunch of 
  similar-but-not-entirely-unlike flavours of Winders out there, and more. Why 
  did you want to run Linux anyway? To be a k3w1 1337 h4X0r 
d00d?
My reasons for installing this distro are 
none of your business. If you can't help, stay out of the street.


Johnny Ernst Nielsen 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Um, I see that particular question on and off on different lists. So you 
  better think again sir.
I stated that type of question 
rarely ever gets a polite reply. Thank-you for making my point.

  So, sir, you are simply not right.
Think so? The following 
was posted on debian-alpha. So far, no 
answers. I don't think it has anything to do with the question specifics. It 
seems to have everything to do with whether or not the question is sufficiently 
"interesting."
Hi:

On an 
AS/200, at the MILO prompt, I should be following these instructions, from the 
"Installing Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 for Alpha":

  
  To bootstrap the installation system, 
  enter the following command at the MILO prompt:  MILO boot fd0:linux.gz root=/dev/fd0 load_ramdisk=1

  If you are booting from something other 
  than a floppy, substitute fd0 in the above example with the 
  appropriate device name in Linux notation. The help command would 
  give you a brief MILO command reference. 
Where is "linux.gz?" when 
I use the path "sr0:boot/linux.", MILO complains that this is not a gzipped 
file.
I would prefer not to install from floppies. Presumably I have a 
"bootable" CD-ROM image, although LSL disclaims any responsibility for the 
contents of the CD-ROM. 

It looks like even though I boot MILO, and can access a CD-ROM drive, I 
still have to rawrite  then boot from floppies to continue the 
installation? Perhaps linux.gz is 
the machine-specific image created by the install 
process?

I note that the section "Obtaining and 
Installing Linux" at www.linuxdoc.org 
doesn't actually mention this 
file.


Viktor Rosenfeld 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (who does get it) 
wrote:

  In fact, I think it's a very poorly worded 
  question, because it simply does not narrow down the problem space enough. 
  
Of course it's a poorly worded question: that's my point. There are so many 
failure modes that it's not possible to elucidate them all. Boasting about the 
quality of the documentation proves nothing to the rank beginner.

  Eg, one could include an error message that mount 
  gives, debugging information from the kernel, or if your newbie enough, not to 
  know that such information exists, you could describe that eg, the busy light 
  of the CD-ROM keeps flashing eratically, or that the drive makes funny noises, 
  and the like. If there's no such behavior, you should write that too, so some 
  options can be dismissed as possible sources for 
problems.
I added another CD-ROM at SCSI ID #4, leaving the failing drive at ID 
#5. From MILO, the command "ls -t iso9660 sr0:boot" succeeded, and the command 
"ls -t iso9660 sr1:boot" failed; error messages indicate that sr1: is unable to 
sense the presence of the disk.


Re: Thoughts on RTFM

2001-11-30 Thread Jeff . Chimene
I really don't want to single out Viktor Rosenfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but his opinion is the pearl seed for a
particular observation. Simultaneously, it represents the rational voice
of most people who try to carry the stone, and is astonishingly wide of the
mark. So:
 [1] I don't really have anything against step-by-step instructions, I've
 read a lot in my learning process and I've written a couple of myself to
 help out others. I just think that step-by-step instructions should
 serve as a base to familirize (sp?) yourself with the problem. Once you
 get it going, you should follow up some of the information.

This is the sort of Pollyanna Principle thinking that will keep Linux on the
sidelines. For example, I just purchased the Debian distro from LSL. Guess
what? They probably pressed it using multi-session CD format; which format
my 5 yr. old SCSI CD-ROM drive won't read. RTFM is clearly not an answer:
how will that answer solve a problem created by such an arbitrary decision
by a vendor? No amount of RTFM is going to help here. No-one, on any list,
is going to attempt to answer a question like: I just bought a CD and my
computer won't read it. What's wrong? And no, I haven't asked LSL in which
format they burned the CD; such a question is likely to be met w/ shrugs,
stares, and a lip curl that could lift 10 stone.

Tell me, [list], how would you phrase such a question so that it could be
solved with step-by-step instructions that don't elicit the answer under
discussion? RTFM is *not* an option. It's a rude, elitist opinion that has
no shortage of clueless technocrats willing to fill the airwaves with that
meaningless answer. There are so *many* things that can go wrong trying to
install any Linux distro that the simplistic RTFM - now go away  is
nothing short of technical infanticide. It sounds funny to the dittoheads
who parrot the Hacker's Dictionary, but will never help carry the stone. The
sui generis proposition: Once you get it going is an unsustainable
directive to all but the earnest propeller-head.

It's not even *remotely* possible to familirize (sp?) yourself with a
problem like incompatible CD formats. I gave up on Red Hat, because of their
bogus RPM, and utter lack of competent technical support. Throwing myself
into the Debian mosh pit is beginning to look like an even worse mistake.

FWIW, the CD format clue was suggested by a co-worker; it sounds just
plausible enough to be true.