Re: Advice for a bug report

2012-03-17 Thread Brian
On Fri 16 Mar 2012 at 16:45:13 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:

 Baruch whatmeurg...@yahoo.com wrote:
  # aptitude why iceweasel
  i   sun-java6-plugin Depends firefox | firefox-2 | iceweasel | 
  mozilla-firefox |
    iceape-browser | mozilla-browser | 
  epiphany-gecko 
   | epiphany-webkit | epiphany-browser | galeon 
  | mid
   browser | moblin-web-browser | xulrunner | 
  xulrunne
   r-1.9 | konqueror | chromium-browser | midori 
  | goo
   gle-chrome 
 
 I really don’t understand why someone thought this dependency would
 be a good idea, because the list containing all supported browsers
 can hardly be complete (for example, Opera is missing).

Not that I completely understand either but I'd theorise that the
dependency has to be so explicit because Java is involved. It wouldn't
do to have Lynx replace Iceweasel!

As for there being an exact equivalant in apt to 'aptitude why', I do
not think there is. 'apt-cache rdepends' is the best it has to offer at
present.

As you said, there is no bug in the alternatives system but Baruch may
gain a little more understanding from:

http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=47t=82722


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120317192946.GN4889@desktop



Re: Advice for a bug report

2012-03-16 Thread Claudius Hubig
Hello Baruch,

please respond to the list rather than me personally. Please also
don’t top-post (cf. http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html ).

I took the liberty to quote the relevant part of your answer in case
someone else finds this thread:

Baruch whatmeurg...@yahoo.com wrote:
 # aptitude why iceweasel
 i   sun-java6-plugin Depends firefox | firefox-2 | iceweasel | 
 mozilla-firefox |
   iceape-browser | mozilla-browser | 
 epiphany-gecko 
  | epiphany-webkit | epiphany-browser | galeon | 
 mid
  browser | moblin-web-browser | xulrunner | 
 xulrunne
  r-1.9 | konqueror | chromium-browser | midori | 
 goo
  gle-chrome 

I really don’t understand why someone thought this dependency would
be a good idea, because the list containing all supported browsers
can hardly be complete (for example, Opera is missing).

Best regards,

Claudius
-- 
Kites rise highest against the wind -- not with it.
-- Winston Churchill
Please use GPG: ECB0C2C7 4A4C4046 446ADF86 C08112E5 D72CDBA4
http://chubig.net telnet://nightfall.org:4242


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Advice for a bug report

2012-03-15 Thread Baruch
The debian bug reporting system webpage wrote to e-mail this list for advice 
regarding against which package a bug should be reported, so here goes . . .

I had decided to:
    apt-get -s purge iceweasel* firefox*


But apt-get insisted:
   The following extra packages will be installed:
       iceape iceape-browser iceape-chatzilla

So I thought I would out-wit apt-get:
   apt-get -s purge iceweasel* firefox* iceape iceape-browser iceape-chatzilla

But apt-get was ready:
   The following extra packages will be installed:
   epiphany-browser epiphany-browser-data epiphany-gecko

Now, dig this:
    apt-get -s purge iceweasel* firefox* iceape iceape-browser iceape-chatzilla 
epiphany-browser epiphany-browser-data epiphany-gecko

Apt-get responds:

The following NEW packages will be installed:
  alacarte apg evolution-data-server folks-common galeon galeon-common 
gconf-service gir1.2-accountsservice-1.0 gir1.2-caribou-1.0
  gir1.2-folks-0.6 gir1.2-gconf-2.0 gir1.2-gee-1.0 gir1.2-gkbd-3.0 
gir1.2-gmenu-3.0 gir1.2-mutter-3.0 gir1.2-networkmanager-1.0
  gir1.2-panelapplet-4.0 gir1.2-polkit-1.0 gir1.2-soup-2.4 
gir1.2-telepathyglib-0.12 gir1.2-telepathylogger-0.2
  gir1.2-upowerglib-1.0 gjs gnome-applets gnome-applets-data gnome-contacts 
gnome-control-center gnome-control-center-data
  gnome-online-accounts gnome-panel gnome-panel-data gnome-power-manager 
gnome-session gnome-session-fallback gnome-shell
  gnome-shell-common gnome-themes-standard gnome-user-guide libcaribou-common 
libcaribou0 libebackend-1.2-1 libedata-book-1.2-11
  libedata-cal-1.2-13 libedataserverui-3.0-1 libfolks-eds25 
libfolks-telepathy25 libfolks25 libgconf-2-4 libgjs0b
  libgnome-control-center1 libgnome-menu-3-0 libgoa-1.0-0 libgoa-1.0-common 
libgweather-3-0 libgweather-common libmetacity-private0a
  libmozjs185-1.0 libmozjs2d libmutter0 libpanel-applet-4-0 librest-0.7-0 
librest-extras-0.7-0 libsocialweb-client2 libsocialweb0
  libtelepathy-logger2 metacity metacity-common mutter-common 
notification-daemon xulrunner-1.9.1


My guess is that this is a bug somewhere in the 'alternatives' system, and that 
it is (against my wishes) trying to force me to have a graphical browser 
installed.

Against what package should I file the bug? (FWIW - debian wheezy)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1331854075.24735.yahoomail...@web110505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com



Re: Advice for a bug report

2012-03-15 Thread Claudius Hubig
Hello Baruch,

Baruch whatmeurg...@yahoo.com wrote:
 My guess is that this is a bug somewhere in the 'alternatives' system, and 
 that it is (against my wishes) trying to force me to have a graphical browser 
 installed.

Probably not.
 
 Against what package should I file the bug? (FWIW - debian wheezy)

Probably against none.

iceweasel (and epiphany-browser) both provide two virtual packages,
www-browser and gnome-www-browser. Try

$ aptitude why www-browser
$ aptitude why gnome-www-browser
$ aptitude why iceweasel

to find out why these package need to be provided on your system at
the moment.

Best regards,

Claudius

PS: Does somebody know something similiar for apt-get? rdepends is
not exactly the same thing as why.
-- 
A shortcut is the longest distance between two points.
Please use GPG: ECB0C2C7 4A4C4046 446ADF86 C08112E5 D72CDBA4
http://chubig.net telnet://nightfall.org:4242


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Advice for a bug report

2012-03-15 Thread Brian
On Thu 15 Mar 2012 at 16:27:55 -0700, Baruch wrote:

[Snipped: apt-get doings]

 My guess is that this is a bug somewhere in the 'alternatives' system,
 and that it is (against my wishes) trying to force me to have a
 graphical browser installed.
 
 Against what package should I file the bug? (FWIW - debian wheezy)

The result of 'cat /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-www-browser', please.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120316005146.GG4889@desktop