Re: Workaround for bug #874598 - Ardour: GUI doesn't load
On Sb, 14 sep 19, 04:00:08, Yoann LE BARS wrote: > > But as it is the first time I propose some workaround to a bug, I want > to make sure I have done what is needed. So, can anyone confirm my > message is sufficient of if I should do something more? Depends on what you mean by "sufficient" ;) As you might have noticed, your message does show up in the bug log, so it is available both for the maintainer (to maybe implement a solution) and for other users. As a next possible step, depending on your skill level and available time you could come up with a patch and submit that to the bug as well. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Workaround for bug #874598 - Ardour: GUI doesn't load
Hello everybody out there! I am using Debian 10 : $ cat /etc/debian_version 10.1 I am using Ardour 5 from standard distribution repositories: $ aptitude versions ardour i 1:5.12.0-3stable 900 I have experimented bug #874598, i.e. Ardour GUI does not load. I have asked for help on Ardour forum: https://discourse.ardour.org/t/no-graphical-interface-with-ardour-5-on-debian-10/101633 It turned out that this bug is a bug from GTK 2. As most developing efforts from GTK team are on GTK 3 and 4, it seems quite unlikely that the bug will be solved at all. But there is a quite simple workaround to this, as indicated on Ardour bug tracker: https://tracker.ardour.org/view.php?id=5605 It is quite simple. Before running Ardour, you have to set a variable: $ export GTK2_RC_FILES=/usr/share/themes/Adwaita/gtk-2.0/gtkrc Then run Ardour. I have tested this, with this workaround Ardour GUI does load. I have sent a comment to Debian bug tracker for bug #874598 : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874598 But as it is the first time I propose some workaround to a bug, I want to make sure I have done what is needed. So, can anyone confirm my message is sufficient of if I should do something more? Best regards. -- Yoann LE BARS http://le-bars.net/yoann/ Diaspora* : yleb...@framasphere.org
Ardour
Scusate se scivo ma non so usare reportbug e non sono molto pratico della riga di comando. Il mio problema nell'installare Ardour sta nel fatto che mi chiede l'installazione di libglib1.2 e altro ma impossibile farlo in quanto disinstalla altre librerie aggiornate recentemente . Uso Debian 4.01 amd64 su AMD64 Athlon x2 dual core 4000+ versione kernel linux-image-2.6.22-2-amd64 Grazie per l'aiuto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem with fonts helvetica ISO8859-1 for ARDOUR
Hallo Jürgen, Am 2006-11-28 19:58:20, schrieb Jürgen Schöneberg: I get startup error message: The font -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-8-*-*-*-p-*-*-* does not support all the required character sets for the current locale en_US (Missing character set ISO8859-1) (Missing character set ISO8859-1) The font -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-p-*-*-* does not support all the required character sets for the current locale en_US (Missing character set ISO8859-1) (Missing character set ISO8859-1) . I tried with dpkg-reconfigure locales with no success. Are you sure, you have at least one of the locale: en_US en_US.ISO-8859-1 en_US.ISO-8859-15 en_US.UTF-8 configured? What is the output of 'locale -a' ? And Do you have tried to change the fonts to: -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--8-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1 Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
problem with fonts helvetica ISO8859-1 for ARDOUR
Hej! after some updates (xorg) on my system (demudi) I get problems with the fonts in ardour 0.99.3 all letters are to large for the boxes in the GUI. I get startup error message: The font -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-8-*-*-*-p-*-*-* does not support all the required character sets for the current locale en_US (Missing character set ISO8859-1) (Missing character set ISO8859-1) The font -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-p-*-*-* does not support all the required character sets for the current locale en_US (Missing character set ISO8859-1) (Missing character set ISO8859-1) . I tried with dpkg-reconfigure locales with no success. Any ideas how can I get rid of this problem thanks for a tip!! Juergen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unable to start qjackctl and ardour
Chris I found your post regarding PREPARING YOUR KERNEL FOR JACK: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/05/msg03172.html it is pretty complete, thank you very much for the tip. Regards Marcelo On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 11:49 -0400, Chris Metzler wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:55:40 -0200 Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: John thank you very much for your detailed answer. I am using the default 2.6.8 kernel in Debian. I tried the jackstart command and I got: marcelo:~$ jackstart jackstart: cannot get realtime capabilities, current capabilities are: =ep cap_setpcap-ep probably running under a kernel with capabilities disabled, a suitable kernel would have printed something like =eip So, I will follow your advice, and will re-compile my kernel with the options you suggest. I was thinking to do it anyway in order to improve performance. I will use the 2.6.16 kernel. To understand what this is all about, you may want to read this post I made to debian-user a couple of years ago, particularly the part titled PREPARING YOUR KERNEL FOR JACK. It's a bit dated, insofar as I mainly concentrated on 2.4.x kernels; but the point is the same. -c -- Marcelo Chiapparini [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unable to start qjackctl and ardour
On Monday 16 October 2006 09:36, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: [...] I am running sarge. And I want to use ardour. I have installed ardour and qjackctl. But the only way to run both, qjackctl to start the jack deamon, and ardour, is as root. I am unable to star both programs as a normal user. How can I fix this? [...] Jack can be run as a normal user by installing realtime-lsm-source and building the realtime-lsm module for your kernel by running module-assistant. Then you can run jack as a normal user when this module is loaded. (Sometimes I have had to reboot before the module will load successfully.) I think by default any user in the audio group can use it. However, for this to work you need CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=m in your kernel config. which is not the Debian default, so you may have to recompile your kernel. If you do, you may as well change the timer resolution to 1000 Hz, which is necessary for decent audio work: CONFIG_HZ_1000=y CONFIG_HZ=1000 There is also the jackstart command, which has never worked for me... Anyway, once you have jack running as a normal user, ardour should run that way too. I know, it should be easier! HTH, John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unable to start qjackctl and ardour
John thank you very much for your detailed answer. I am using the default 2.6.8 kernel in Debian. I tried the jackstart command and I got: marcelo:~$ jackstart jackstart: cannot get realtime capabilities, current capabilities are: =ep cap_setpcap-ep probably running under a kernel with capabilities disabled, a suitable kernel would have printed something like =eip So, I will follow your advice, and will re-compile my kernel with the options you suggest. I was thinking to do it anyway in order to improve performance. I will use the 2.6.16 kernel. Regards, Marcelo On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 16:02 +1000, John O'Hagan wrote: On Monday 16 October 2006 09:36, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: [...] I am running sarge. And I want to use ardour. I have installed ardour and qjackctl. But the only way to run both, qjackctl to start the jack deamon, and ardour, is as root. I am unable to star both programs as a normal user. How can I fix this? [...] Jack can be run as a normal user by installing realtime-lsm-source and building the realtime-lsm module for your kernel by running module-assistant. Then you can run jack as a normal user when this module is loaded. (Sometimes I have had to reboot before the module will load successfully.) I think by default any user in the audio group can use it. However, for this to work you need CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=m in your kernel config. which is not the Debian default, so you may have to recompile your kernel. If you do, you may as well change the timer resolution to 1000 Hz, which is necessary for decent audio work: CONFIG_HZ_1000=y CONFIG_HZ=1000 There is also the jackstart command, which has never worked for me... Anyway, once you have jack running as a normal user, ardour should run that way too. I know, it should be easier! HTH, John -- Marcelo Chiapparini [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unable to start qjackctl and ardour
Chris, thank you very much for your answer. The situation is the following. As a normal user I want to use qjackctl in order to start jack. Then I get the followin message: cannot lock down memory for jackd (Operation not permitted) loading driver .. apparent rate = 48000 creating alsa driver ... hw:0|hw:0|1024|2|48000|0|0|nomon|swmeter|-| 32bit control device hw:0 configuring for 48000Hz, period = 1024 frames, buffer = 2 periods Couldn't open hw:0 for 32bit samples trying 24bit instead Couldn't open hw:0 for 24bit samples trying 16bit instead Couldn't open hw:0 for 32bit samples trying 24bit instead Couldn't open hw:0 for 24bit samples trying 16bit instead JACK: unable to mlock() port buffers: Operation not permitted jack_create_thread: error 1 setting scheduler parameters after thread creation: Operation not permitted cannot start watchdog thread cannot load driver module alsa 09:57:47.539 JACK was stopped successfully. 09:57:49.523 Could not connect to JACK server as client. Only when I run the command as root I can start jack. As you suggested, the problem has to do with realtime privileges. It seems that the answer of John O'Hagan provides the solution, which requires a kernel recompilation. Regards, Marcelo On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 01:03 -0400, Chris Metzler wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:36:19 -0200 Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: Dear list, I am running sarge. And I want to use ardour. I have installed ardour and qjackctl. But the only way to run both, qjackctl to start the jack deamon, and ardour, is as root. I am unable to star both programs as a normal user. How can I fix this? Could you elaborate? What do you mean by unable to start? How do you try to start them, and what error messages do you get when you try? As an aside, have you read the related documentation for jackd? If so, do your problems relate to realtime privileges? -c -- Marcelo Chiapparini [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unable to start qjackctl and ardour
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:55:40 -0200 Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: John thank you very much for your detailed answer. I am using the default 2.6.8 kernel in Debian. I tried the jackstart command and I got: marcelo:~$ jackstart jackstart: cannot get realtime capabilities, current capabilities are: =ep cap_setpcap-ep probably running under a kernel with capabilities disabled, a suitable kernel would have printed something like =eip So, I will follow your advice, and will re-compile my kernel with the options you suggest. I was thinking to do it anyway in order to improve performance. I will use the 2.6.16 kernel. To understand what this is all about, you may want to read this post I made to debian-user a couple of years ago, particularly the part titled PREPARING YOUR KERNEL FOR JACK. It's a bit dated, insofar as I mainly concentrated on 2.4.x kernels; but the point is the same. -c -- Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove snip-me. to email) As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I have become civilized. - Chief Luther Standing Bear signature.asc Description: PGP signature
unable to start qjackctl and ardour
Dear list, I am running sarge. And I want to use ardour. I have installed ardour and qjackctl. But the only way to run both, qjackctl to start the jack deamon, and ardour, is as root. I am unable to star both programs as a normal user. How can I fix this? Thanks in advance Marcelo -- Marcelo Chiapparini [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unable to start qjackctl and ardour
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:36:19 -0200 Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: Dear list, I am running sarge. And I want to use ardour. I have installed ardour and qjackctl. But the only way to run both, qjackctl to start the jack deamon, and ardour, is as root. I am unable to star both programs as a normal user. How can I fix this? Could you elaborate? What do you mean by unable to start? How do you try to start them, and what error messages do you get when you try? As an aside, have you read the related documentation for jackd? If so, do your problems relate to realtime privileges? -c -- Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove snip-me. to email) As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I have become civilized. - Chief Luther Standing Bear signature.asc Description: PGP signature
problem with sound.alsa,ardour,kscd.
I began my problems with programs like audacity,ardour etc. I could not get them up and running,it was ardour that could not connect to Jack or audacity that had problems with the audio input/output layer.But I got that my problem was more difficult: the system could not play any sound. With the CD player KsCD I see the screen showing that the songs are playing but I don´t hear any sound. In KDE Control Center the sound system is enabled,nothing is muted but when I press the TestSound button I don´t hear anything. However when Debian initializes I see: snd-powermac ALSA is loading... (or so) all modules loaded. I run alsaconf and everything is OK,all dialogs are OK,the final screen saying that all is OK,I run alsamixer nothing is muted,but the computer simply don´t play any sound. In Mac OS 9.2 the sound system is perfect,CD player etc. all O.K., so I don´t know what to do.My system is one of the latest testing before the first official DebianPPC 3.1 came out(June 2005). __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ardour
Quelqu'un utilise-t-il Ardour sur sa Debian ? J'aimerais savoir les config qui fonctionnent bien (mémoire minimum, CPU, etc ...) pour de l'enregistrement assez réduit (genre piano voix et quelques effets ... ) merci Fabrice -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ardour
fabrice lods a écrit : Quelqu'un utilise-t-il Ardour sur sa Debian ? J'aimerais savoir les config qui fonctionnent bien (mémoire minimum, CPU, etc ...) pour de l'enregistrement assez réduit (genre piano voix et quelques effets ... ) merci Fabrice Salut As tu entendu parler de DeMudi ou bien Apodio, deux distributions linux totalement dédiées à l'audio ? Si tu souhaites de tourner vers du Debian essaie DeMuDi : kernel optimisé pour le son basse latence etc. www.agnula.org (leur site est très lent...) Voila ! Tu pourras utiliser sans problèmes Ardour ! Je l'utilise depuis près d'un an et demi et il remplace parfaitement les ProTools et autre alternatives non-libres avec un peu d'habitude :) Bonne Journée. -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ardour
Je sais, je pense installer une Demudi mais j'ai besoin d'infos matérielles j'ai un pentium III à 650 avec 512 de ram et j'ai peur que ça ne suffise pas Le mercredi 07 décembre 2005 à 14:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : fabrice lods a écrit : Quelqu'un utilise-t-il Ardour sur sa Debian ? J'aimerais savoir les config qui fonctionnent bien (mémoire minimum, CPU, etc ...) pour de l'enregistrement assez réduit (genre piano voix et quelques effets ... ) merci Fabrice Salut As tu entendu parler de DeMudi ou bien Apodio, deux distributions linux totalement dédiées à l'audio ? Si tu souhaites de tourner vers du Debian essaie DeMuDi : kernel optimisé pour le son basse latence etc. www.agnula.org (leur site est très lent...) Voila ! Tu pourras utiliser sans problèmes Ardour ! Je l'utilise depuis près d'un an et demi et il remplace parfaitement les ProTools et autre alternatives non-libres avec un peu d'habitude :) Bonne Journée. -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ardour
fabrice lods wrote: Je sais, je pense installer une Demudi mais j'ai besoin d'infos matérielles j'ai un pentium III à 650 avec 512 de ram et j'ai peur que ça ne suffise pas Le mercredi 07 décembre 2005 à 14:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : fabrice lods a écrit : Quelqu'un utilise-t-il Ardour sur sa Debian ? J'aimerais savoir les config qui fonctionnent bien (mémoire minimum, CPU, etc ...) pour de l'enregistrement assez réduit (genre piano voix et quelques effets ... ) merci Fabrice Salut As tu entendu parler de DeMudi ou bien Apodio, deux distributions linux totalement dédiées à l'audio ? Si tu souhaites de tourner vers du Debian essaie DeMuDi : kernel optimisé pour le son basse latence etc. www.agnula.org (leur site est très lent...) Voila ! Tu pourras utiliser sans problèmes Ardour ! Je l'utilise depuis près d'un an et demi et il remplace parfaitement les ProTools et autre alternatives non-libres avec un peu d'habitude :) Bonne Journée. Installes plutot planet CRRMA, c est peut etre base sur une fedora mais c est stable ... Alexandre -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ardour
c'est assez.On 12/7/05, fabrice lods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Je sais, jepense installer une Demudimais j'ai besoin d'infos matériellesj'ai un pentium III à650 avec 512de ram et j'ai peur que ça ne suffise pasLe mercredi 07 décembre 2005 à 14:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : fabrice lods a écrit : Quelqu'un utilise-t-il Ardour sur sa Debian ? J'aimerais savoir les config qui fonctionnent bien (mémoire minimum, CPU, etc ...) pour de l'enregistrement assez réduit (genre piano voix et quelques effets ... ) merci Fabrice Salut As tu entendu parler de DeMudi ou bien Apodio, deux distributions linux totalement dédiées à l'audio ? Si tu souhaites de tourner vers du Debian essaie DeMuDi : kernel optimisé pour le son basse latence etc. www.agnula.org (leur site est très lent...) Voila ! Tu pourras utiliser sans problèmes Ardour ! Je l'utilise depuis près d'un an et demi et il remplace parfaitement les ProTools et autre alternatives non-libres avec un peu d'habitude :) Bonne Journée. --Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrenchPensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Demudi, ardour, ladspa itd
witam W zwiazku z faktem, ze szukam i nie znajduje :) zapytam tutaj: czy moze ktos wyjasnic dlaczego podczas nagrywania sciezki dzwiekowej (w programie Ardour) wraz z pluginem Ladspa (powiedzmy jakis delay) tuz przed nagrywaniem plugin dziala w czasie rzeczywistym (z wejsciem liniowym), lecz w trakcie procesu nagrywania nie dziala i slychac normalnie sygnal liniowy. Oczywiscie odtwarzanie samego nagrania jest juz z delayem. ... innymi slowy, czy ktos wie moze jak nagrywac w real-time z dodanym efektem, tak zeby mozna go bylo slyszec podczas nagrania dziekuje za wszelkie sugestie darek DeMuDi 1.2.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jack and ardour in sarge broken?
Hi, Saw this on linux-audio-user (names removed) quote don't forget to update to the demudi's jack,ardour version. sarge's broken (ehem, it doesn't work for me). Didn't Sarge ship with the horrible NPTL 0.60 bug? That should be reason enough to use Ubuntu, Debian does not seem to mind shipping completely non-working packages. /quote Is this true? -- Chris. == -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[OT] Alternativen zu ardour was: [OT] ardour unter Debian
Nur damit jemand bei google diesen Eintrag findet, falls er sich auf einer ähnlichen Suche wie ich befindet: Um ein kleines Aufnahmestudio unter Debian einzurichten hatte ich zunächst ardour-gtk entdeckt, bin aber dann auf Umwegen inspiriert worden, die Tools ecasound und audacity zu nutzen wie hier beschrieben: http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/10/20/1423245 Ei, d's g'fallt ma sehr gut und ist auch so viel praktischer das Aufnehmen von der Konsole aus. Ich nehme an die Tools werden auch ressourcenschonender sein zumindest laufen sie anstandslos. Wegen des angeknackseten RAM's werde ich mich zwar dennoch bemühen müssen - aber zumindest kann ich so schonmal weitermachen und meine Bedürfnissen jetzt schon voll nachkommen. (Es geht vor allem darum mehrspurig Dialoge aufzunehmen, beispielsweise um Hörspiele zu erstellen.) Schöne Grüße Jochen. -- Jochen Heller Berlin Germany E-Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.mojo-networx.org ICQ: 164338222 proud Debian user since 2004 and Linux-User #357813 Registered with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ PGP-Public-Key available at hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --- System: CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ Board: K7S6A Speicher: 512 MB (DDR333) Grafikkarte: Radeon VE 64 MB Festplatten: IDE 60 GB, IDE 20 GB Kernel: 2.6.8-1-k7 XServer: XFree 4.3.0 OS: Debian Sarge 3.1 DM: KDE 3.3 ---
Re: [OT] (?) ardour unter Debian
Hallo Jochen. *** Jochen Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ich versuche seit einiger Zeit ardour-gtk ans Laufen zu bekommen, es will aber nicht so richtig. Zuerst hatte ich es als Debian-Paket installiert (ich glaub das ist so um Version 0.5), da erhalte ich aber immer einen Speicherzugriffsfehler. ardour-gtk luft hier auf sarge in der Version 0.9beta24-1 sehr schn. (Speicherzugriffsfehler hatte ich immer unter SuSE - egal, ob als rpm installiert oder selbst kompiliert.) Keine Ahnung, wo Du an die Version 0.5 gekommen bist - ich habe ardour als Debian-Paket aus testing installiert. Also ist meine Frage, nutzt jemand von Euch ardour oder hat jemand von Euch einmal ardour auf einem Debian-System eingerichtet, gibt es dabei irgendwelche Besonderheiten zu beachten? Besonderheiten hatte ich weiter keine zu beachten, auer, dass natrlich ein jackd laufen muss, wenn ardour starten soll. Wenn jemanden daran etwas auffllt oder er mir seine Erfahrungen mit Ardour mitteilen kann, wre ich sehr dankbar. Weiter kann ich Dir leider keine Erfahrungen mitteilen, auer, dass ardour, wenn man aus einer bestehenden session heraus eine neue anlegen will, ardour sich verabschiedet - ist aber ein bekanntes Problem und soll in der cvs-Version behoben sein. Ansonsten ist ardour ein sehr mchtiges tool. Regards/Gre, Christoph Werkhausen pgpVYkrMAtgTf.pgp Description: PGP signature
[OT] (?) ardour unter Debian
Hallo Ihr Lieben, ich versuche seit einiger Zeit ardour-gtk ans Laufen zu bekommen, es will aber nicht so richtig. Zuerst hatte ich es als Debian-Paket installiert (ich glaub das ist so um Version 0.5), da erhalte ich aber immer einen Speicherzugriffsfehler. Da auf der ardour-Homepage dazu etwas gesagt wird wie: Don't mind, it's probably a bug - dachte ich mir: Kompilier Dir doch einfach mal die aktuelle Version. Nachdem ich schließlich sämtliche zusätzlichen Pakete installiert hatte, die zur Kompilierung notwendig waren, endete der Kompiliervorgang schließlich bitter mit segmentation fault - das ist doch Speicherzugriffsfehler, oder? (Ihr seht, ich bin nun wirklich kein Programmierer.) Ich bin guter Dinge, dass dieses, für meine Zwecke sehr passend anmutende Programm, irgendwie zum Laufen zu bringen sein muss. Schließlich gibt es nicht nur How-Tos mit Screenshots, es gibt auch gute Kritiken, alles Inidizien für mich, dass Menschen dieses Programm tatsächlich benutzen. Also ist meine Frage, nutzt jemand von Euch ardour oder hat jemand von Euch einmal ardour auf einem Debian-System eingerichtet, gibt es dabei irgendwelche Besonderheiten zu beachten? Natürlich schließe ich nicht einmal annähernd aus, dass ich zu blöd bin - obwohl - ich möchte es zu unerfahren in diesen Dingen nennen. Zu meinem System: es ist Sarge auf einem Athlon, so wie auch im Profil ganz unten steht. Da ich wie gesagt kein Programmierer bin, hab ich mich nicht dem Ehrgeiz hingegeben ein Debian-Package daraus backen zu wollen. (Das sieht zwar einfach aus, aber muss ich da nicht noch Dateien mit den Abhängigkeiten editieren, das traue ich mir noch nicht zu.) Ich hab's einfach nach /usr/local/bin installieren wollen. Als letzte Ausgabe des Kompiliervorganges hätte ich das hier anzubieten: g++ -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/local/share/locale\ -I. -I. -I. -D_REENTRANT -O3 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -fstrength-reduce -fmove-all-movables -mmmx -msse -mfpmath=sse -m3dnow -pipe -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I/usr/local/src/ardour-0.9beta24/libs/sigc++ -I/usr/local/src/ardour-0.9beta24/libs/sigc++/sigc++/config -I/usr/local/src/ardour-0.9beta24/libs/pbd -I/usr/local/src/ardour-0.9beta24/libs/midi++ -I/usr/local/src/ardour-0.9beta24/libs/ardour -I/usr/local/src/ardour-0.9beta24/libs/soundtouch -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DCONFIG_DIR=\/usr/local/etc\ -DDATA_DIR=\/usr/local/share\ -MT redirect.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/redirect.Tpo -c redirect.cc -o redirect.o redirect.cc: In member function `virtual int ARDOUR::Redirect::set_state(const XMLNode)': redirect.cc:350: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-3.3/README.Bugs. make[4]: *** [redirect.lo] Fehler 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/ardour-0.9beta24/libs/ardour' make[3]: *** [install-recursive] Fehler 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/ardour-0.9beta24/libs/ardour' make[2]: *** [install] Fehler 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/ardour-0.9beta24/libs/ardour' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Fehler 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/ardour-0.9beta24/libs' make: *** [install-recursive] Fehler 1 Wenn jemanden daran etwas auffällt oder er mir seine Erfahrungen mit Ardour mitteilen kann, wäre ich sehr dankbar. Schöne Grüße Jochen. -- Jochen Heller Berlin Germany E-Mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.mojo-networx.org ICQ: 164338222 proud Debian user since 2004 and Linux-User #357813 Registered with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ PGP-Public-Key available at hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --- System: CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ Board: K7S6A Speicher: 512 MB (DDR333) Grafikkarte: Radeon VE 64 MB Festplatten: IDE 60 GB, IDE 20 GB Kernel: 2.6.8-1-k7 XServer: XFree 4.3.0 OS: Debian Sarge 3.1 DM: KDE 3.3 ---
Re: [OT] (?) ardour unter Debian
Jochen Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Da auf der ardour-Homepage dazu etwas gesagt wird wie: Don't mind, it's probably a bug - dachte ich mir: Kompilier Dir doch einfach mal die aktuelle Version. Nachdem ich schließlich sämtliche zusätzlichen Pakete installiert hatte, die zur Kompilierung notwendig waren, endete der Kompiliervorgang schließlich bitter mit segmentation fault - das ist doch Speicherzugriffsfehler, oder? (Ihr seht, ich bin nun wirklich kein Programmierer.) Wenn schon die Kompilierung mit einem Sig11/SegFault abbricht, dann würde ich einmal die Hardware prüfen, also memtest86+ mal für ein paar Stunden laufen lassen. redirect.cc:350: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Hrm. Das Code so subtil kaputt ist, das ein ICE getriggert wird, das hat man wirklich selten. Öfters ist da die Hardware wackelig. CPU zu warm? Speicher zu warm? Spannungen strubbelig? Netzteil zu schwach? S° -- BOFH excuse #327: The POP server is out of Coke -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
ardour
Bonsoir, j'essaie d' installer ardour mais apt ne trouve pas le package: louze:~# apt-get install ardour Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait E: Impossible de trouver le paquet ardour louze:~# apt-cache search ardour ardour-doc - Ardour documentation ardour-gtk - digital audio workstation (graphical gtk interface) ardour-session-exchange - Ardour session collaboration tool libardour0 - library for building professional digital audio applications libardour0-dev - libardour development files libgtkmmext0 - library of useful new C++ and C widgets for gtkmm users libgtkmmext0-dev - libgtkmmext development files libmidi++0 - C++ library for handling MIDI I/O, including MMC and MTC libmidi++0-dev - libmidi++ development files libpbd0 - library of useful, generic C++ objects libpbd0-dev - libpbd development files tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing LADSPA plugins
Re: ardour
Sat, 13 Nov 2004 20:54:54 +0100, Thomas a écrit : Bonsoir, j'essaie d' installer ardour mais apt ne trouve pas le package: louze:~# apt-get install ardour Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait E: Impossible de trouver le paquet ardour louze:~# apt-cache search ardour ardour-doc - Ardour documentation ardour-gtk - digital audio workstation (graphical gtk interface) ardour-session-exchange - Ardour session collaboration tool libardour0 - library for building professional digital audio applications libardour0-dev - libardour development files libgtkmmext0 - library of useful new C++ and C widgets for gtkmm users libgtkmmext0-dev - libgtkmmext development files libmidi++0 - C++ library for handling MIDI I/O, including MMC and MTC libmidi++0-dev - libmidi++ development files libpbd0 - library of useful, generic C++ objects libpbd0-dev - libpbd development files tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing LADSPA plugins Il semble qu'il n'y a pas de paquet « ardour », mais ardour-gtk ne fait-il pas l'affaire ? -- Sylvain Sauvage
Re: ardour
Sylvain Sauvage a écrit : Sat, 13 Nov 2004 20:54:54 +0100, Thomas a écrit : Bonsoir, j'essaie d' installer ardour mais apt ne trouve pas le package: louze:~# apt-get install ardour Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait E: Impossible de trouver le paquet ardour louze:~# apt-cache search ardour ardour-doc - Ardour documentation ardour-gtk - digital audio workstation (graphical gtk interface) ardour-session-exchange - Ardour session collaboration tool libardour0 - library for building professional digital audio applications libardour0-dev - libardour development files libgtkmmext0 - library of useful new C++ and C widgets for gtkmm users libgtkmmext0-dev - libgtkmmext development files libmidi++0 - C++ library for handling MIDI I/O, including MMC and MTC libmidi++0-dev - libmidi++ development files libpbd0 - library of useful, generic C++ objects libpbd0-dev - libpbd development files tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing LADSPA plugins Il semble qu'il n'y a pas de paquet « ardour », mais ardour-gtk ne fait-il pas l'affaire ? là je vis un grand moment de solitude, merci Sylvain ;)
Re: Ardour debs?
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:22:23PM -0500, stan wrote: I discoverd Ardour today, courtesy of a Slashdot post. Looks like just what I need. Anyone have a line on debs for it? The general answer is apt-get.org, followed by google, but I think ardour is a special case, where the developers asked for it not to be packaged yet...I think... -- Rob Weir [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ertius.org/ msg29636/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Ardour debs?
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 08:13:28PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:22:23PM -0500, stan wrote: I discoverd Ardour today, courtesy of a Slashdot post. Looks like just what I need. Anyone have a line on debs for it? The general answer is apt-get.org, followed by google, but I think ardour is a special case, where the developers asked for it not to be packaged yet...I think... From the ardour FAQ, referring to the question why no tarballs?, but I think you could apply it to debs as well: Why no tarballs? a) Because at this point in its development, I don't want to deal with bug reports from a version that's more than 3 hours old. I am not going to build and upload tarballs every 3 hours. Ardour sometimes changes dramatically internally several times in a day. CVS lets people easily, quickly, cheaply get the latest changes and build a completely up-to-date version. -- James Hughes msg29735/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Ardour debs?
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 03:05:14PM -0500, James Hughes wrote: On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 08:13:28PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:22:23PM -0500, stan wrote: I discoverd Ardour today, courtesy of a Slashdot post. Looks like just what I need. Anyone have a line on debs for it? The general answer is apt-get.org, followed by google, but I think ardour is a special case, where the developers asked for it not to be packaged yet...I think... From the ardour FAQ, referring to the question why no tarballs?, but I think you could apply it to debs as well: Why no tarballs? a) Because at this point in its development, I don't want to deal with bug reports from a version that's more than 3 hours old. I am not going to build and upload tarballs every 3 hours. Ardour sometimes changes dramatically internally several times in a day. CVS lets people easily, quickly, cheaply get the latest changes and build a completely up-to-date version. Well, that might apply, if it wern't such a PIA to build it on Debian. I would sugest that if the author wan't everyone to build from CVS (which I geuss is his right), that if he really wants anyone to _use_ this package, he should make it easier to build on likely target systems. Just mu $0.02 worth. -- They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More ardour build requiremnets questions
stan wrote: I'm trying to build Ardour from CVS, which appears to be the only way to get it. I have installed the unstable version of gettext, which it needs, and now it wants automake 1.5 or greater. I tried to apt-get automake from unstable, hoping it would be a later version, but there does not seem to be a version of automake in unstable. Has anyone succeeded in building this package on debian? It looks very useful, so if anyone has, I could use a pointer or 2. Thanks. There are seperate packages for automake1.5, automake1.6, and automake1.7 which apparently aren't completely compatible. Pick one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ardour debs?
I discoverd Ardour today, courtesy of a Slashdot post. Looks like just what I need. Anyone have a line on debs for it? -- They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
