Re: change slapd during debian instalation

2013-12-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi,

paulo bruck paulobru...@gmail.com (2013-12-18):
 Is it possible to change slapd during debian install? I have done a lot of
 pachages wich depends on some changes at ldap and all this pachakes depends
 on this changes...
 
 Please let me know if I asking at the correct list.

I'm not sure which kind of changes you're thinking of, but I think your
question might be better asked on debian-user@ (cc'd).

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Debian instalation

2007-01-19 Thread Guillermo Garron

Hi,

I have found some valuable info over the internet, and got some of it
to build my own server.

I put all that info in this page, hope could be useful to somebody.

http://www.go2linux.org/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=40Itemid=9

best regards,

--
Guillermo Garron
Linux IS user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.
(Using FC6, CentOS4.4 and Ubuntu 6.06)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/go2linux
http://www.go2linux.org


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Debian instalation

2007-01-19 Thread Kevin Ross
 -Original Message-
 From: Guillermo Garron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:15 PM
 To: Debian-Users List
 Subject: Debian instalation
 
 Hi,
 
 I have found some valuable info over the internet, and got some of it
 to build my own server.
 
 I put all that info in this page, hope could be useful to somebody.
 
 http://www.go2linux.org/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=40Itemid=9
 
 best regards,
 
 -- 
 Guillermo Garron
 Linux IS user friendly... It's just selective about who its 
 friends are.
 (Using FC6, CentOS4.4 and Ubuntu 6.06)
 http://feeds.feedburner.com/go2linux
 http://www.go2linux.org


My comments:

- During installation, it asks you for a single word hostname, and you put
a FQDN.
- You chose manual partitioning, but the partition scheme you created
could have been done through guided partitioning.
- You go through a lot of trouble to run Bind in a chroot jail.  However,
you don't explain why you do it, and you don't explain the steps you're
taking.  Since this is supposed to be a beginner's howto, beginners won't
learn anything if you don't explain.  Personally, I'd get rid of Bind
and run a leaner, more secure DNS server, like PowerDNS.
- Since you're installing dovecot, there's no need to install saslauthd.
Dovecot has its own SASL authentication daemon.
- Since you're creating SSL certs, you shouldn't allow plaintext auth.
You should require TLS/SSL for plaintext auth.
- Under Spamassassin configuration, you created a user called spamfilter,
But in the postfix configuration, you're starting the spamchk script as
user filter.  Most like a typo.

Also, overall, there's very little in the way of helpful explanation
for someone new to Debian, which the document is supposed to be addressing.

-- Kevin



Re: Debian instalation

2003-12-07 Thread Mariano Kamp
On Sunday 07 December 2003 02:46, king kong wrote:
[ .. ]
 Oh, and don't get me go into the installer. It just
 plain
 sucks (Yeah, shoot me, I said it!). For god sake, we
 are almost passed half of the first decaded of the 21
 century, and we still can't have a good installer that
 recognizes the hardware properly. For my server, I
 didn't dare to buy any new hardware, only those that
 are at least 2 years old, and it still can't get it.
 E.g.
 DLink DFE-530TX, PT-Link cards, and some old
 ATI cards. I can pop Knoppix and Mepis in, and they
 just works fine. Same for RH, Mandrake and Suse.
 The package management is cool and fine, but if you
 can't get pass the installation, you can't use it.
Did you ever try the beta-1 of the new installer? Just curious ...
It worked very well for me and detected all the right stuff. Apart from having 
to use fdisk I believe almost everybody will be able to install Linux with 
it. 
And regarding the fdisk thing. I am not sure, but I believe to remember that 
there might have been an option to let the installer do the partitioning.

[..]
 Actually, we are evaluating
 the
 distros for a client with a 50-server installation in
 a
 data center. They gave the hardware specs, and I'm
 really concerned about the debian installation
 process.
That's very interesting. Especially for installing 50 systems with a common 
set of software it is debian coming to my mind, not any other distribution.

Cheers,
Mariani


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debian instalation

2003-12-07 Thread Mariano Kamp
On Saturday 06 December 2003 13:18, Mihai P. B. Stiucan wrote:
 There would be an ideea to install it from scratch , but I'm not so
 experimented to keep track of the files by myself.

 I will be very happy if I will succed to do a debian based system with
 XFree86 4.0.1 at least, and KDE 3.1 using Grub boot loader.
Hi,

  welcome to Debian. A great choice ;-)

  The 128KBits line is a burden, but that should only be a problem if you are 
tracking unstable/sid. From yesterday to today I got 140 MB download (that is 
one day), but this won't happen if you go for testing/sarge. Between two 
releases of a package is a minimum gap of 10 days (afaik). 

  What kind of system are you setting up? A webserver you want to put on the 
net and never want to spare a second thought on it? Woody is probably good 
for you here. 
If you want more current software and are willing to take a little risk go for 
testing/sarge. Go to /etc/apt/sources.list and replace all stable with 
sarge. Enter apt-get update to update your package database and apt-get 
dist-upgrade for upgrading the whole installation. This will also add new 
packages which you haven't had before, but are now available in the stock 
sarge distro. You likely will have to download more than 100 MB. The good 
thing is that you can interrupt the download process at any time and resume 
just there when doing an dist-upgrade again.

Only problem with sarge is, that for some package with loads of dependencies 
it takes a long time to trach it. KDE 3.1 has taken ages.

Cheers,
Mariano


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Debian instalation

2003-12-06 Thread Mihai P. B. Stiucan
Hello,

I am an RedHat user and now I saw that RedHat is no more available as a 
free distribution. So i want to switch to Debian. I found some help on 
the www.debian.org web site, but I still need some advices.

I saw there that they are 3 stages: stable, testing, unstable. For sure 
I choosed stable on my first pick,, got the images and installed it. 
After that, I noticed that all the utilities are old: XFree86, KDE, and 
most of the packages. I really need some new one, not necesarly the 
newest. Ok, ok, i know the new one are on testing, but I will assume the 
risk to use them.

Somebody told me to install woody and then to use apt-get to do some 
upgrades.

In fact I need some advices for install debian but with new packages. I 
don't have a big bandwidth internet access, just 128kb/sec, and I have 
only the woody CDs. What should i do? Just install woody and then 
upgrade using apt-get? How will this apt-get handle the Xfree86 or KDE 
upgrade? There are numerous files to upgrade, is it possible to keep 
track of all of them?

There would be an ideea to install it from scratch , but I'm not so 
experimented to keep track of the files by myself.

I will be very happy if I will succed to do a debian based system with 
XFree86 4.0.1 at least, and KDE 3.1 using Grub boot loader.

I need some advices, really.

Thanks for your time.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debian instalation

2003-12-06 Thread Kent West
Mihai P. B. Stiucan wrote:

Hello,

I am an RedHat user and now I saw that RedHat is no more available as 
a free distribution. So i want to switch to Debian. I found some help 
on the www.debian.org web site, but I still need some advices.

I saw there that they are 3 stages: stable, testing, unstable. For 
sure I choosed stable on my first pick,, got the images and installed 
it. After that, I noticed that all the utilities are old: XFree86, 
KDE, and most of the packages. I really need some new one, not 
necesarly the newest. Ok, ok, i know the new one are on testing, but I 
will assume the risk to use them.

For the most part, testing and unstable are quite usable on a desktop 
workstation that doesn't need 24x7 reliability. I run sid (unstable) on 
all my workstations (stable (woody) on my servers), and every few 
upgrades (I usually upgrade about twice a week on my main workstations 
to get the newest toys) see some sort of glitch, ranging from some one 
or three packages that gets broken (usually something I can live without 
for a few days until it gets fixed) to a more serious problem such as 
the pam problem a couple of years ago which prevented any new logins. 
I've found sid to be easier to live with than testing, because whereas 
testing is more stable, when a bug does show up in testing it usually 
takes longer for the fix to show up, because it's, um, more stable than 
the constantly fluxing unstable (sid).

Somebody told me to install woody and then to use apt-get to do some 
upgrades.

In fact I need some advices for install debian but with new packages. 
I don't have a big bandwidth internet access, just 128kb/sec, and I 
have only the woody CDs. What should i do? Just install woody and then 
upgrade using apt-get? How will this apt-get handle the Xfree86 or KDE 
upgrade? There are numerous files to upgrade, is it possible to keep 
track of all of them?

128kb/sec will be slow, but I've done upgrades over a 33.3kb modem on 
two or three occassions. It works, but slowly. The problem with the slow 
speed is that the packages change in sid faster than you can download 
them sometimes.

Still, I think the easiest route for you would be to point you 
/etc/apt/sources.list at a Debian mirror's testing or unstable 
repositories, then run
   apt-get update
   apt-get upgrade
and sit back and let the magic work.

You might run into a few glitches, since you're going from a supported 
version to an unsupported version that's still in flux and is not 
guaranteed to upgrade smoothly, but I don't think you'll run into any 
great problems.

There would be an ideea to install it from scratch , but I'm not so 
experimented to keep track of the files by myself.

I will be very happy if I will succed to do a debian based system with 
XFree86 4.0.1 at least, and KDE 3.1 using Grub boot loader.

After the above-mentioned update/upgrade, you'll still have lilo instead 
of grub. So you'll then need to run apt-get install grub, and then 
configure grub. I've done it a time or two, but my brain just hasn't 
quite wrapped itself around grub's configuration yet, so I can't help on 
that score.

--
Kent


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debian instalation

2003-12-06 Thread Arthur Barlow
On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 14:18:22 +0200, Mihai P. B. Stiucan wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I am an RedHat user and now I saw that RedHat is no more available as a 
 free distribution. So i want to switch to Debian. I found some help on 
 the www.debian.org web site, but I still need some advices.
 
 I saw there that they are 3 stages: stable, testing, unstable. For sure 
 I choosed stable on my first pick,, got the images and installed it. 
 After that, I noticed that all the utilities are old: XFree86, KDE, and 
 most of the packages. I really need some new one, not necesarly the 
 newest. Ok, ok, i know the new one are on testing, but I will assume the 
 risk to use them.
 
 Somebody told me to install woody and then to use apt-get to do some 
 upgrades.
 
 In fact I need some advices for install debian but with new packages. I 
 don't have a big bandwidth internet access, just 128kb/sec, and I have 
 only the woody CDs. What should i do? Just install woody and then 
 upgrade using apt-get? How will this apt-get handle the Xfree86 or KDE 
 upgrade? There are numerous files to upgrade, is it possible to keep 
 track of all of them?
 
 There would be an ideea to install it from scratch , but I'm not so 
 experimented to keep track of the files by myself.
 
 I will be very happy if I will succed to do a debian based system with 
 XFree86 4.0.1 at least, and KDE 3.1 using Grub boot loader.
 
 I need some advices, really.
 
 Thanks for your time.

I agree with Kent.  I have used Debian and Red Hat and now I much prefer
Debian as the package management IMHO is much better.  I've used stable,
testing, and unstable and I concur that unstable is actually very stable
for a desktop.  I'm using it to send this message with PAN.  Give Sid a
try and I think you'll like it.  If you need some instructions to set up
Grub try this link:

http://myrddin.org/howto/debian-grub.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debian instalation

2003-12-06 Thread csj
On 6. December 2003 at 2:18PM +0200,
Mihai P. B. Stiucan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am an RedHat user and now I saw that RedHat is no more
 available as a free distribution. So i want to switch to
 Debian. I found some help on the www.debian.org web site, but I
 still need some advices.

I'm a Debian User myself ;-), but since you're already a Red Hat
user you might want to consider the Fedora distribution:
http://fedora.redhat.com/.  Debian after all does some things
differently.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debian instalation

2003-12-06 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 02:18:22PM +0200, Mihai P. B. Stiucan wrote:
 I saw there that they are 3 stages: stable, testing, unstable. For sure 
 I choosed stable on my first pick,, got the images and installed it. 
 After that, I noticed that all the utilities are old: XFree86, KDE, and 
 most of the packages. I really need some new one, not necesarly the 
 newest. Ok, ok, i know the new one are on testing, but I will assume the 
 risk to use them.

http://www.apt-get.org/  Check for backports.

 Somebody told me to install woody and then to use apt-get to do some 
 upgrades.

Woody == Stable.

- -- 
 .''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/0oVMUzgNqloQMwcRAkj5AJ4lfUch5i1ciiz4RkDm+wSazaK6qwCfdjsm
eFG/RZMvhD50E2baX6bn58U=
=wjj+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debian instalation

2003-12-06 Thread king kong
Hehe, I know the feeling :) Started with Slackware,
went to RH, tried Suse, Mandrake and Gentoo (later)
sometimes along the way, and have stayed with RH 
consistently since 5.2.

Kent gave an intro already to upgrade your system,
you just have to specify in the apt source list which
one you want. I haven't played with mixed installation
(stable + testing + sid) yet. 

I don't like old desktops, so I upgrade my computers 
to sid. After using it for a month on my laptop and 
on two  test servers (no GUI though), it seems
good enough so I put them in real production use. 
Ok, small office, with a few servers and
firewall/gateway
only.

If you are new to debian but know linux well, don't 
bother with the debian directly. Get Knoppix or
Mepis installed on your machine first, and upgrade
later. Will save you tons of time and frustration.

I think your connection (128K) should be good enough
to do the upgrade, if you can find a mirror that can
give consistent download.

The only thing I don't like is, even with sid, a lot
of 
the packages are still old compared to other distros
(Mandrake always has the most recent).  And a few
of them just don't work (e.g. mrproject,
fwbuilder,...).
I'll maintain some nightly/weekly build when I learn
how to do my own deb packaging.

And i18n/l10n is not as good either. I still can't get
it to display Chinese in my gnome-terminal despite 
that I have made all the necessary config/fonts and
installed
and loaded the right nls packages of the filesystem.
Applications can display/input Chinese just fine, the
filesystem can't. RH and Mandrake just have the best
support on this.

Oh, and don't get me go into the installer. It just
plain 
sucks (Yeah, shoot me, I said it!). For god sake, we 
are almost passed half of the first decaded of the 21
century, and we still can't have a good installer that
recognizes the hardware properly. For my server, I 
didn't dare to buy any new hardware, only those that
are at least 2 years old, and it still can't get it.
E.g. 
DLink DFE-530TX, PT-Link cards, and some old
ATI cards. I can pop Knoppix and Mepis in, and they
just works fine. Same for RH, Mandrake and Suse.
The package management is cool and fine, but if you
can't get pass the installation, you can't use it. 

All my installations start with Knoppix, and then back
to
the debian upgrade.

But Knoppix and Mepis have very primitive installer,
you 
can't really specify your way of partitioning the
disk.
You have to partition your disk, format your
filesystem,
after installing knoppix, copy the files/directories
to 
the partition you want, and make changes to your
fstab, etc And Knoppix/Mepis only come with KDE
and I prefer Gnome, while gnoppix is not ready yet,
have to do about 300MB of install from apt-get to get
my desktop to the way I like it (almost...) after
spending
all these times downloading the Knoppix/Mepis and
debian ISO already :(

Someone please make a good installer (something is
going on here, but not ready yet), and start some
kind of donation campaign, a la Mandrake Club or
something. I'll put my money where my mouth is.
I currently already have 3 machines running debian
in production, and I'll pay for a good installer for
my future installation. Actually, we are evaluating
the
distros for a client with a 50-server installation in
a
data center. They gave the hardware specs, and I'm
really concerned about the debian installation 
process.

I have always paid for my RH and Mandrake, retail
box version though, to encourage them to make 
good desktop and encourage the stores to carry them.

Sorry, long rant. I like the package mgmt though, on
the condition that you can get it up and running
first.

kk


--- Mihai P. B. Stiucan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I am an RedHat user and now I saw that RedHat is no
 more available as a 
 ...
 I need some advices, really.
 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debian instalation

2003-12-06 Thread Kent West
king kong wrote:

Someone please make a good installer (something is
going on here, but not ready yet), and start some
kind of donation campaign, a la Mandrake Club or
something. I'll put my money where my mouth is.
 

I believe it's called Xandros or Libranet.

--
Kent


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Quite-OT] Kernel bombs on debian instalation

2001-08-29 Thread Calvin Chong



Recently thrown to a case from friends, having such 
configuration:

IWill KD266 Mainboard (ALi1535D+ south 
bridge)
Athlon Thunderbird 1GHz Tested, Functional by 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 
another M.B.
128 MB Tested (Memtest86) RAM

Isolated Hardwares:

Seagate ST330620A (Functional, Tested on my Intel 
system)
Rioch MP7083A (Functional, Tested)

Now i wonder that the chipset may be failed; having 
googled on
Ali Chipset and discovered some post on kernel 
mailing list about
that - however, there are no quite good replies 
there except quite
a bit of code from alan cox. :~

anyone have experience on this?

--
A gas which obeys to the perfect gas equation is a 
perfect gas,where the perfect gas equation describes the relationship 
between pressure, volume and temperature of a perfect 
gas.


Re: [Quite-OT] Kernel bombs on debian instalation

2001-08-29 Thread ktb
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:16:47AM +0800, Calvin Chong wrote:
 Recently thrown to a case from friends, having such configuration:
 
 IWill KD266 Mainboard (ALi1535D+ south bridge)
 Athlon Thunderbird 1GHz Tested, Functional by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 
 another M.B.
 128 MB Tested (Memtest86) RAM
 
 Isolated Hardwares:
 
 Seagate ST330620A (Functional, Tested on my Intel system)
 Rioch MP7083A (Functional, Tested)
 
 Now i wonder that the chipset may be failed; having googled on
 Ali Chipset and discovered some post on kernel mailing list about
 that - however, there are no quite good replies there except quite
 a bit of code from alan cox. :~
 
 anyone have experience on this?

What exactly are you trying to say here?  From what I gather you suspect
a hardware failure of some kind and you are trying to nail down which
component.

First off it's best to test the components together.  Just because a
stick of RAM works in one computer doesn't mean it will work in another.  

Second what is the problem?  Will the computer not post?  Can't it boot?
Does it run for a bit and crash?  Explain the symptoms.
kent

  



Coping/Moving a Debian Instalation to Another Drive

1999-09-09 Thread Tiago A Macambira

Hi folks!

I installed Debian in a  600M partition. OK, it is damn small
but i just thought it would be a enough when I created it. Anyway, my
father just came to me today asking if I would be interested in
changing the 2G disk where the linux partition is by an 3.5G one.
Well, that would be the solution to my problem, wouldn't it?

The problem is that I have to give him an answer AND the 2G
disk today, with no further delays. Since I don't want to re-start
downloading - yes, downloaded the whole thing with a 52k modem - and
setting a Debian system up again, I was wondering if would be possible
to copy/move this debian installation to the new drive and how would
that be done.

IS there a how to talking about this? Since i use loadlin, is there any 
booting/special
blocks stuff i should know? Any single command solution? -hey, i
really don't have time to RTFM now so...  :)


And just to remember: I only have until tonight to  give daddy
:) an answer and to copy/move the partition. So, PLEASE, write your
answers quickly... :)

TIA

[MaCa]

---
I may be drunk, but in the morning I will be sober, while you will
still be stupid and ugly. -Winston Churchill

--==( Tiago Alves MaCambira )==- -==( UIN: 5340883  )==--
--==([EMAIL PROTECTED])==- -==(  [EMAIL PROTECTED] )==--
  --==(  Computer Science Student  @ UFC, BRAZIL  )==--


Re: Coping/Moving a Debian Instalation to Another Drive

1999-09-09 Thread Raymond A. Ingles
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Tiago A Macambira wrote:

   The problem is that I have to give him an answer AND the 2G
 disk today, with no further delays. Since I don't want to re-start
 downloading - yes, downloaded the whole thing with a 52k modem - and
 setting a Debian system up again, I was wondering if would be possible
 to copy/move this debian installation to the new drive and how would
 that be done.

 Short answer, yes. I assume this is IDE. If it's SCSI, hopefully you can
fill in the necessary changes.

 Make a boot floppy. (If you can't recompile a kernel with make zdisk,
just execute the command dd if=/vmlinuz of=/dev/fd0, this will probably
work.) Do *NOT* proceed until you have a floppy that will boot into your
Debian system.

 Set the new drive to be a slave to the old drive. (You'll probably need
to set jumpers.) Install it. Boot.

 At this point the old drive will be /dev/hda and the new one will be
/dev/hdb. Partition the new drive to taste. If your Debian partition is
/dev/hda1, make sure there's a /dev/hdb1. Then, make a filesystem on the
new partition (Assuming it's hdb1, execute the command mke2fs
/dev/hdb1.)

 Use the Debian rescue floppy (the one that you used to install the
system, not the boot floppy you just made), and boot the system. Spawn
out to a shell. Go to the /mnt directory, and create two directories,
old and new.

 Mount the old partition to /mnt/old (mount /dev/hda1 /mnt/old). Mount
the new partition to /mnt/new (mount /dev/hdb1 /mnt/new). Use the
command cp -a to copy everything from the old partition to the new one.
For example, cd /mnt/old;cp -a . /mnt/new). Unmount the partitions
(umount /mnt/old;umount /mnt/new), shut down the system.

 Remove the old drive, and jumper the new one to be master. Boot with the
boot floppy. Hopefully, the system will actually boot. At this point, run
lilo to reinstall the Master Boot Record and you'll be happy. If it
doesn't work, give Dad back his drive and put the old one back in.

 This is quick, dirty, and off the top of my head. No warranty express or
implied. If you destroy your system, you have my sympathies but it's *not
my fault*. :-

 Sincerely,

 Ray Ingles (248) 377-7735   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Microsoft Windows - Don't get frustrated without it.


A problem with Debian instalation

1998-11-11 Thread Juan Pablo Marti Alberola

  I have an AMD 386DX 40Mhz computer with a Monochrom Herc screen.
 and 4 Mb of Ram. For instalation Debian, first I insert the floppy 
with lowmem.bin image and I make a partitions necessaries. When I 
insert the rescue disk to install debian, after  load linuxand 
detect the hardware, the system stops with the message:
Panic kernel: unable to mount .
I want to know if exists an spanish manual, because thats another 
problem.
Thanks


Problems on Debian Instalation

1998-01-28 Thread Luis Magalhaes
When I try to install Debian, my computer blocks on the Checking 386/87 
coupling. I waited a lot and nothing, i think is of my Vesa Local Bus, 
i have a 486 DX2 at 66Mhz, 16 Mb of Ram, and two Seagates (ST-3600A and 
ST-3630A).
In a friend of mine house i installed the debian ok, but in my house i 
canĀ“t.
Please if someone knows how to deblock me :), this is not the time 
neither the please to joke, but i have to keep the humor.

Please email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To all Linux Lovers, My thanks.


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .