Re: Galeon not to be in Woody?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:02:41AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: | Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:12:01PM -0500, The Doctor What wrote: | > > I saw Anthony Towns's message about Galeon not being in Woody. | > > | > > Is this true even for galeon 1.0? | > | > That depends if anyone can get mozilla 0.9.9 into woody in time for the | > release. Galeon 1.0 was removed because it appeared at the time that it | > had release-critical bugs, although from conversations since it appears | > that this may have been mistaken. | [snip] | > The two mozilla release-critical bugs mentioned above were recently | > closed. However, another one was recently opened: | > | > * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to | >security problem | >Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott | >Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security. | | Heh, if that "grave bug" keeps mozilla 0.99 and galeon out of woody, | something's not right... Don't worry about that one, it's tagged "wontfix" now. I hate the auto-search feature anyways (and turn it off ASAP in any browser). The worst is when you enter an explicit URL to go to (possibly with an ipliteral) and the browser takes you to a search engine. (the real problem was a minor typo in the url or a dns or network problem that you're trying to fix -D -- The heart is deceitful above all things and beyond cure. Who can understand it? I the Lord search the heart and examine the mind, to reward a man according to his conduct, according to what his deeds deserve. Jeremiah 17:9-10 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Galeon not to be in Woody?
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:12:01PM -0500, The Doctor What wrote: > > I saw Anthony Towns's message about Galeon not being in Woody. > > > > Is this true even for galeon 1.0? > > That depends if anyone can get mozilla 0.9.9 into woody in time for the > release. Galeon 1.0 was removed because it appeared at the time that it > had release-critical bugs, although from conversations since it appears > that this may have been mistaken. [snip] > The two mozilla release-critical bugs mentioned above were recently > closed. However, another one was recently opened: > > * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to >security problem >Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott >Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security. Heh, if that "grave bug" keeps mozilla 0.99 and galeon out of woody, something's not right... -- Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Galeon not to be in Woody?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:12:01PM -0500, The Doctor What wrote: > I saw Anthony Towns's message about Galeon not being in Woody. > > Is this true even for galeon 1.0? That depends if anyone can get mozilla 0.9.9 into woody in time for the release. Galeon 1.0 was removed because it appeared at the time that it had release-critical bugs, although from conversations since it appears that this may have been mistaken. * mozilla (2:0.9.8-2 to 2:0.9.9-4) + Maintainer: Takuo KITAME + 8 days old (needed 2 days) + out of date on hppa: libnspr-dev, libnspr4, libnss-dev, libnss3, mozilla, mozilla-browser, mozilla-chatzilla, mozilla-dev, mozilla-dom-inspector, mozilla-js-debugger, mozilla-mailnews, mozilla-psm, mozilla-xmlterm (from 2:0.9.9-3) + mozilla (source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, m68k, powerpc, s390, sparc) is buggy! (2 > 0) + Not considered * galeon (- to 1.2.0-3) + Maintainer: Jared Johnson (Debian) + 4 days old (needed 2 days) + Trying to remove package, not update it + Not considered + Depends: galeon mozilla The two mozilla release-critical bugs mentioned above were recently closed. However, another one was recently opened: * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to security problem Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Galeon not to be in Woody?
Lo, on Wednesday, April 10, The Doctor What did write: > I saw Anthony Towns's message about Galeon not being in Woody. > > Is this true even for galeon 1.0? Not sure about this. However, it's pretty straightforward to install Galeon from Sid on top of a Woody system; I've been doing that here for about 2 weeks now, and it's worked out just fine. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Galeon not to be in Woody?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:12:01PM -0500, The Doctor What wrote: | I saw Anthony Towns's message about Galeon not being in Woody. | | Is this true even for galeon 1.0? Likely : $ apt-cache policy galeon galeon: Installed: 1.0.3-0.4 Candidate: 1.0.3-0.4 Version Table: 1.2.0-3 0 95 http://http.us.debian.org sid/main Packages *** 1.0.3-0.4 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status There is no galeon in woody, and never has been (AFAIK). The problem is that all depenendcies must also be in woody, and there must be no RC bugs against those packages. It's a shame because galeon isn't very unstable at all. (I think the problems I've had are due to my X server in some way, or due to Java) -D -- The Consultant's Curse: When the customer has beaten upon you long enough, give him what he asks for, instead of what he needs. This is very strong medicine, and is normally only required once. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Galeon not to be in Woody?
I saw Anthony Towns's message about Galeon not being in Woody. Is this true even for galeon 1.0? Ciao! -- Any given program will expand to fill available memory. The Doctor What: Kaboom! http://docwhat.gerf.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] KF6VNC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
