Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Richard Owlett

On 02/24/2018 12:02 PM, Felix Miata wrote:

Richard Owlett composed on 2018-02-24 10:48 (UTC-0600):


I had just done a minimal (command line only) install of Stretch from
the first DVD of the complete set rather than using netinst to conserve
bandwidth. The install as usual was successful.



I wish to install a package from the repository - it's not on DVD1.
I added the line
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main non-free contrib
to sources.list while commenting out the line referencing CDROM.



I attempted to run "apt-get update".
It *FAILED*
The message was the source I wanted was being ignored.



WHY?

  Mirror problems in .us.???


No. A typo in the following "apt-get install ..." line ;/




Do you get also get failure if you s/apt-get/apt/g ?






Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Richard Owlett

On 02/24/2018 12:01 PM, Brian wrote:

On Sat 24 Feb 2018 at 11:55:29 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:


On 02/24/2018 11:08 AM, Reco wrote:

Hi.

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:06:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:

On 02/24/2018 10:56 AM, John Hasler wrote:

Verbatim command


apt-get update  (as per
<https://manpages.debian.org/stretch/apt/apt-get.8.en.html>)


verbatim message


The message started a recognizable abbreviation of "ignored".
For a character perfect quote - where would it be logged?


apt-get update > /tmp/somefile

Reco




OK, I mis-remembered which line had "Ign". Here is redo:

Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates InRelease
Ign:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch InRelease
Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch Release
Reading package lists...


So I redid the apt-get install which got me problem chasing,
(apt-get install xorg lightdm lvwm) whose captured output was:

Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...


That was followed by an uncaptured line saying:
E: Unable to locate package lvwm


lvwm doesn't exist.



Ba Baaa
Signed: He With Sheepish Look

Thanks all.





Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Felix Miata
Richard Owlett composed on 2018-02-24 10:48 (UTC-0600):

> I had just done a minimal (command line only) install of Stretch from 
> the first DVD of the complete set rather than using netinst to conserve 
> bandwidth. The install as usual was successful.

> I wish to install a package from the repository - it's not on DVD1.
> I added the line
>deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main non-free contrib
> to sources.list while commenting out the line referencing CDROM.

> I attempted to run "apt-get update".
> It *FAILED*
> The message was the source I wanted was being ignored.

> WHY?
 Mirror problems in .us.???

Do you get also get failure if you s/apt-get/apt/g ?
-- 
"Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Whatever else you
get, get wisdom." Proverbs 4:7 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/



Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Brian
On Sat 24 Feb 2018 at 11:55:29 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:

> On 02/24/2018 11:08 AM, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:06:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > On 02/24/2018 10:56 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> > > > Verbatim command
> > > 
> > > apt-get update  (as per
> > > <https://manpages.debian.org/stretch/apt/apt-get.8.en.html>)
> > > 
> > > > verbatim message
> > > 
> > > The message started a recognizable abbreviation of "ignored".
> > > For a character perfect quote - where would it be logged?
> > 
> > apt-get update > /tmp/somefile
> > 
> > Reco
> > 
> > 
> 
> OK, I mis-remembered which line had "Ign". Here is redo:
> > Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates InRelease
> > Ign:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch InRelease
> > Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch Release
> > Reading package lists...
> 
> So I redid the apt-get install which got me problem chasing,
> (apt-get install xorg lightdm lvwm) whose captured output was:
> > Reading package lists...
> > Building dependency tree...
> > Reading state information...
> 
> That was followed by an uncaptured line saying:
> E: Unable to locate package lvwm

lvwm doesn't exist.

-- 
Brian.



Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Richard Owlett

On 02/24/2018 11:08 AM, Reco wrote:

Hi.

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:06:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:

On 02/24/2018 10:56 AM, John Hasler wrote:

Verbatim command


apt-get update  (as per
<https://manpages.debian.org/stretch/apt/apt-get.8.en.html>)


verbatim message


The message started a recognizable abbreviation of "ignored".
For a character perfect quote - where would it be logged?


apt-get update > /tmp/somefile

Reco




OK, I mis-remembered which line had "Ign". Here is redo:

Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates InRelease
Ign:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch InRelease
Hit:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch Release
Reading package lists...


So I redid the apt-get install which got me problem chasing,
(apt-get install xorg lightdm lvwm) whose captured output was:

Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...


That was followed by an uncaptured line saying:
E: Unable to locate package lvwm

Color me more confused ;<




Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread John Hasler
The messages emitted by apt-get update are cryptic and undocumented, but
see


-- 
John Hasler 
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA



Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Brian
On Sat 24 Feb 2018 at 17:31:21 +, Brian wrote:

> On Sat 24 Feb 2018 at 11:06:53 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> 
> > On 02/24/2018 10:56 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> > > Verbatim command
> > 
> > apt-get update  (as per
> > )
> > 
> > > verbatim message
> > 
> > The message started a recognizable abbreviation of "ignored".
> 
> "ign" means there have been no changes in the file - so it won't
> be downloaded again. Nothing to worry about.

Or maybe not ( when I use a search engine instead of my imagination). 

-- 
Brian.
 



Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Brian
On Sat 24 Feb 2018 at 11:06:53 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:

> On 02/24/2018 10:56 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> > Verbatim command
> 
> apt-get update  (as per
> )
> 
> > verbatim message
> 
> The message started a recognizable abbreviation of "ignored".

"ign" means there have been no changes in the file - so it won't
be downloaded again. Nothing to worry about.

-- 
Brian.



Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Abdullah Ramazanoglu
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:06:53 -0600
Richard Owlett  wrote:
> On 02/24/2018 10:56 AM, John Hasler wrote:
--8<--
>> verbatim message  
> 
> The message started a recognizable abbreviation of "ignored".
> For a character perfect quote - where would it be logged?
> 
>> and verbatim sources.list, please.  
> 
> Here it is
--8<--
> > http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main non-free contrib deb

It could be due to archive signature being incorrect or something. You
can *force*-override this with [ trusted=yes ] in the "deb" line, as in;

deb [ trusted=yes ] http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main
non-free contrib

But it is strongly recommended against using this arbitrarily. (I use
it for home-grown local archives only)
-- 
Abdullah Ramazanoglu




Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Reco
Hi.

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:06:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 02/24/2018 10:56 AM, John Hasler wrote:
> > Verbatim command
> 
> apt-get update  (as per
> )
> 
> > verbatim message
> 
> The message started a recognizable abbreviation of "ignored".
> For a character perfect quote - where would it be logged?

apt-get update > /tmp/somefile

Reco



Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Richard Owlett

On 02/24/2018 10:56 AM, John Hasler wrote:

Verbatim command


apt-get update  (as per 
)



verbatim message


The message started a recognizable abbreviation of "ignored".
For a character perfect quote - where would it be logged?


and verbatim sources.list, please.


Here it is

# 


# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 9.1.0 _Stretch_ - Official i386 DVD Binary-1 
20170722-12:45]/ stretch contrib main

# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 9.1.0 _Stretch_ - Official i386 DVD Binary-1 
20170722-12:45]/ stretch contrib main
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main non-free contrib
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main contrib
deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security stretch/updates main contrib








Re: Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread John Hasler
Verbatim command, verbatim message and verbatim sources.list, please.
-- 
John Hasler 
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA



Problem using "apt-get update"

2018-02-24 Thread Richard Owlett
I had just done a minimal (command line only) install of Stretch from 
the first DVD of the complete set rather than using netinst to conserve 
bandwidth. The install as usual was successful.


I wish to install a package from the repository - it's not on DVD1.
I added the line
  deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main non-free contrib
to sources.list while commenting out the line referencing CDROM.

I attempted to run "apt-get update".
It *FAILED*
The message was the source I wanted was being ignored.

WHY?




Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-21 Thread Brian
On Wed 20 Jan 2016 at 17:56:53 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:34:31 + Brian  wrote:
> 
> > On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> > > Brian  wrote:
> > > 
> > > > http.debian.net/debian/
> > > > 
> > > > is exactly the same as
> > > > 
> > > > httpredir.debian.org/debian/
> > > > 
> > > > The .org indicates it is an official, supported mirror but it
> > > > makes no difference when updating and downloading. The former
> > > > gets you to the latter.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I am aware of this. I used to use httpredir.debian.org in my
> > > sources.list, but switched to http.debian.net because honestly it
> > > just looks better.
> > 
> > Looks do not matter. Either works for now and, for most users, it
> > saves them agonising about which mirror to use.
> 
> If looks don't matter, then why did you correct my recommendation of
> http.debian.net? It points to the same thing anyway, and is easier to
> type.

Users will come across httpredir.debian.org in the documentation so it
was an attempt to head off any confusion which might have arisen in this
thread over the use of two different URIs for the same resource. I think
the redirector developer has committed to both working.



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-21 Thread Brian
On Thu 21 Jan 2016 at 11:04:18 +, Brian wrote:

> If non-free firmware is provided during the course of using the installer
> the "official" sources.list includes non-free. 

A misleading statement. The non-free archive is marked for inclusion but
the user must choose to have it written to sources.list,



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-21 Thread Brian
On Thu 21 Jan 2016 at 23:10:51 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > > > Amr Saber  wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi there,
> > > > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as
> > > > > apt-get couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double
> > > > > checked the spelling for each package) and it just said package
> > > > > not found ... any way, The problem is that the sources.list file
> > > > > was accidentally deleted and I can't find any version of it
> > > > > online and ofcourse the apt-get is no longer working at all
> > > > 
> > > > Assuming you're running stable,
> > > > 
> > > > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable main
> > > > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-updates main
> > > > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-proposed-updates main
> > > > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-backports main
> > > > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> > > > 
> > > > is the complete setup. 
> > > 
> > > It's not complete, it's missing contrib and non-free.
> > 
> > Correction: complete *official* setup anyway. Unless Debian has dropped
> > any pretence of contrib and non-free being unofficial.
> 
> Whatever. To have a fully functioning system you need contrib and
> non-free in your sources.list, sure, you could go out of your way and
> buy hardware which doesn't need any firmware, but guess what, those
> people don't tend to post to this list asking for help.
> 
> > I don't recommend non-free software to anyone as a matter of principle.
> 
> Sure, but when their computer stops working because of an update and the
> installed firmware blob is no longer working, they'll complain to this
> list --- and guess what the posted solution will be? 
> 
> I'm certain it will be "oh, you're missing contrib and non-free in your
> sources.list"
> 
> It appears there was some talk about refining the sources.list, but it's
> not so straight forward:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/01/msg00233.html

If non-free firmware is provided during the course of using the installer
the "official" sources.list includes non-free. 



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-21 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
>  wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > > Amr Saber  wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi there,
> > > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as
> > > > apt-get couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double
> > > > checked the spelling for each package) and it just said package
> > > > not found ... any way, The problem is that the sources.list file
> > > > was accidentally deleted and I can't find any version of it
> > > > online and ofcourse the apt-get is no longer working at all
> > > 
> > > Assuming you're running stable,
> > > 
> > > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable main
> > > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-updates main
> > > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-proposed-updates main
> > > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-backports main
> > > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> > > 
> > > is the complete setup. 
> > 
> > It's not complete, it's missing contrib and non-free.
> 
> Correction: complete *official* setup anyway. Unless Debian has dropped
> any pretence of contrib and non-free being unofficial.

Whatever. To have a fully functioning system you need contrib and
non-free in your sources.list, sure, you could go out of your way and
buy hardware which doesn't need any firmware, but guess what, those
people don't tend to post to this list asking for help.

> I don't recommend non-free software to anyone as a matter of principle.

Sure, but when their computer stops working because of an update and the
installed firmware blob is no longer working, they'll complain to this
list --- and guess what the posted solution will be? 

I'm certain it will be "oh, you're missing contrib and non-free in your
sources.list"

It appears there was some talk about refining the sources.list, but it's
not so straight forward:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/01/msg00233.html

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-20 Thread Adam Wilson
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:34:31 + Brian  wrote:

> On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> > Brian  wrote:
> > 
> > > http.debian.net/debian/
> > > 
> > > is exactly the same as
> > > 
> > > httpredir.debian.org/debian/
> > > 
> > > The .org indicates it is an official, supported mirror but it
> > > makes no difference when updating and downloading. The former
> > > gets you to the latter.
> > > 
> > 
> > I am aware of this. I used to use httpredir.debian.org in my
> > sources.list, but switched to http.debian.net because honestly it
> > just looks better.
> 
> Looks do not matter. Either works for now and, for most users, it
> saves them agonising about which mirror to use.

If looks don't matter, then why did you correct my recommendation of
http.debian.net? It points to the same thing anyway, and is easier to
type.

> > Btw, what exactly is the purpose of '-proposed-updates'? I
> > always enable it for completeness' sake, but is this good practice?
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/StableProposedUpdates
> 
> I've never used it and have no plans to do so. 

Very well then. I only use jessie and jessie-updates at the moment.



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-20 Thread Adam Wilson
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
 wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > Amr Saber  wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as
> > > apt-get couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double
> > > checked the spelling for each package) and it just said package
> > > not found ... any way, The problem is that the sources.list file
> > > was accidentally deleted and I can't find any version of it
> > > online and ofcourse the apt-get is no longer working at all
> > 
> > Assuming you're running stable,
> > 
> > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable main
> > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-updates main
> > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-proposed-updates main
> > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-backports main
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> > 
> > is the complete setup. 
> 
> It's not complete, it's missing contrib and non-free.
> 

Correction: complete *official* setup anyway. Unless Debian has dropped
any pretence of contrib and non-free being unofficial.

I don't recommend non-free software to anyone as a matter of principle.



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-15 Thread Chris Bannister
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> Amr Saber  wrote:
> 
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
> > any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally
> > deleted and I can't find any version of it online and ofcourse the
> > apt-get is no longer working at all
> 
> Assuming you're running stable,
> 
> deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable main
> deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-updates main
> deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-proposed-updates main
> deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-backports main
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> 
> is the complete setup. 

It's not complete, it's missing contrib and non-free.

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-15 Thread Brian
On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> Brian  wrote:
> 
> > http.debian.net/debian/
> > 
> > is exactly the same as
> > 
> > httpredir.debian.org/debian/
> > 
> > The .org indicates it is an official, supported mirror but it makes no
> > difference when updating and downloading. The former gets you to the
> > latter.
> > 
> 
> I am aware of this. I used to use httpredir.debian.org in my
> sources.list, but switched to http.debian.net because honestly it just
> looks better.

Looks do not matter. Either works for now and, for most users, it saves
them agonising about which mirror to use.

> Btw, what exactly is the purpose of '-proposed-updates'? I
> always enable it for completeness' sake, but is this good practice?

https://wiki.debian.org/StableProposedUpdates

I've never used it and have no plans to do so. 



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-15 Thread Adam Wilson
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
Brian  wrote:

> On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 18:18:09 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > Amr Saber  wrote:
> >   
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as
> > > apt-get couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double
> > > checked the spelling for each package) and it just said package
> > > not found ... any way, The problem is that the sources.list file
> > > was accidentally deleted and I can't find any version of it
> > > online and ofcourse the apt-get is no longer working at all  
> > 
> > Assuming you're running stable,
> > 
> > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable main
> > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-updates main
> > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-proposed-updates main
> > deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-backports main
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> > 
> > is the complete setup. For testing, just remove backports and
> > replace 'stable' with 'testing'.  
> 
> http.debian.net/debian/
> 
> is exactly the same as
> 
> httpredir.debian.org/debian/
> 
> The .org indicates it is an official, supported mirror but it makes no
> difference when updating and downloading. The former gets you to the
> latter.
> 

I am aware of this. I used to use httpredir.debian.org in my
sources.list, but switched to http.debian.net because honestly it just
looks better.

Btw, what exactly is the purpose of '-proposed-updates'? I
always enable it for completeness' sake, but is this good practice?



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-14 Thread Brian
On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 09:39:26 +0530, Udyant Wig wrote:

> On 01/14/2016 02:08 AM, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> >>> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> >>> and I can't find any version of it online
> >>
> >> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
> >> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
> >
> > Why not suggest a mirror which would be suitable for anyone, no matter
> > what their location in the world is?
> >
> > deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
> > deb-src http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
> 
>   I tried the redirector a while ago, but one mirror kept returning 403,
>   necessitating reruns of apt(itude).  So, I switched to specific
>   mirrors after that.  I haven't revisited using the redirector since
>   then.

Such (not always transient) errors are not unknown but the redirector
cannot turn a malfunctioning mirror into a well-behaved one. The place
to report such an issue is mirr...@lists.debian.org.

I wonder what the reaction would have been to a suggestion for Amr Saber
to use

  deb http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib ?

httpredir.debian.org/debian/ mitigates the need to think about and
investigate which specific mirror to choose. Of course both can be put
in sources.list.



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-14 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:36:33PM -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> > The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> > and I can't find any version of it online
> 
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
> 
> deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free

Even better:

deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free

99.9% of Debian users will never need the deb-src entries.

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-14 Thread Adam Wilson
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber  wrote:

> Hi there,
> While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
> any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally
> deleted and I can't find any version of it online and ofcourse the
> apt-get is no longer working at all

Assuming you're running stable,

deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable main
deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-updates main
deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-proposed-updates main
deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-backports main
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main

is the complete setup. For testing, just remove backports and replace
'stable' with 'testing'.



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-14 Thread Brian
On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 18:18:09 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:

> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> Amr Saber  wrote:
> 
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
> > any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally
> > deleted and I can't find any version of it online and ofcourse the
> > apt-get is no longer working at all
> 
> Assuming you're running stable,
> 
> deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable main
> deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-updates main
> deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-proposed-updates main
> deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ stable-backports main
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> 
> is the complete setup. For testing, just remove backports and replace
> 'stable' with 'testing'.

http.debian.net/debian/

is exactly the same as

httpredir.debian.org/debian/

The .org indicates it is an official, supported mirror but it makes no
difference when updating and downloading. The former gets you to the
latter.



Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Amr Saber
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
and I can't find any version of it online and ofcourse the apt-get is no
longer working at all


Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Brian
On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:

> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> > The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> > and I can't find any version of it online
> 
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib

Why not suggest a mirror which would be suitable for anyone, no matter
what their location in the world is?

deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
deb-src http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Charlie Kravetz
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber  wrote:

>Hi there,
>While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
>couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
>spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
>any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
>and I can't find any version of it online and ofcourse the apt-get is no
>longer working at all

When you are ready to learn how to build a new one:
https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList

-- 
Charlie Kravetz
Linux Registered User Number 425914
[http://linuxcounter.net/user/425914.html]
Never let anyone steal your DREAM.   [http://keepingdreams.com]



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread rlharris
On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> and I can't find any version of it online

deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib

deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free





Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Jose Martinez



On 01/13/2016 02:38 PM, Charlie Kravetz wrote:

On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber  wrote:


Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
and I can't find any version of it online and ofcourse the apt-get is no
longer working at all


When you are ready to learn how to build a new one:
https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList



You can also check out man 5 sources.list for some good information.
--
Que te vaya bien
JM



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
>
> You can search for packages here:
>
>  http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
>
> > any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally
> > deleted
>
> It's useful to make copies of original configuration files before
> editing them:
>
>  # cp /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list-orig
>
>  # vi /etc/apt/sources.list
>
>
> Better yet is putting them into a version control system.
>
>  > and I can't find any version of it online and ofcourse the apt-get is
>  > no longer working at all
>
> Somebody already posted a Jessie file.  Here's my Wheezy file:
>
> $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 7.8.0 _Wheezy_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD
> Binary-1 20150110-14:41]/ wheezy main
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main
>
> deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-backports main
>
>
> David

And in case you are less purist:

deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free

deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib non-free

deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free

deb http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian wheezy-backports main contrib non-free

deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ wheezy-backports iceweasel-release

Though in both cases Brian's choice of mirror was better.

Lisi



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Amr Saber
I really cant thank you all enough :)
On 14 Jan 2016 01:39, "Lisi Reisz"  wrote:

> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
> > On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > > spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
> >
> > You can search for packages here:
> >
> >  http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
> >
> > > any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally
> > > deleted
> >
> > It's useful to make copies of original configuration files before
> > editing them:
> >
> >  # cp /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list-orig
> >
> >  # vi /etc/apt/sources.list
> >
> >
> > Better yet is putting them into a version control system.
> >
> >  > and I can't find any version of it online and ofcourse the apt-get is
> >  > no longer working at all
> >
> > Somebody already posted a Jessie file.  Here's my Wheezy file:
> >
> > $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> > #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 7.8.0 _Wheezy_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD
> > Binary-1 20150110-14:41]/ wheezy main
> >
> > deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main
> > deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main
> >
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
> > deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
> >
> > deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main
> > deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main
> >
> > deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-backports main
> >
> >
> > David
>
> And in case you are less purist:
>
> deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian wheezy-backports main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ wheezy-backports iceweasel-release
>
> Though in both cases Brian's choice of mirror was better.
>
> Lisi
>
>


Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Jose Martinez



On 01/13/2016 05:38 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:

On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:

On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:

Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...


You can search for packages here:

  http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages


any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally
deleted


It's useful to make copies of original configuration files before
editing them:

  # cp /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list-orig

  # vi /etc/apt/sources.list


Better yet is putting them into a version control system.

  > and I can't find any version of it online and ofcourse the apt-get is
  > no longer working at all

Somebody already posted a Jessie file.  Here's my Wheezy file:

$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 7.8.0 _Wheezy_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD
Binary-1 20150110-14:41]/ wheezy main

deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main

deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main

deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main

deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-backports main


David


And in case you are less purist:

deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free

deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib non-free

deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free

deb http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian wheezy-backports main contrib non-free

deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ wheezy-backports iceweasel-release



Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the 
mozilla.debian.net repository??



Though in both cases Brian's choice of mirror was better.

Lisi



--
Que te vaya bien
JM



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread David Christensen

On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:

Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...


You can search for packages here:

http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages


any way, The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted


It's useful to make copies of original configuration files before 
editing them:


# cp /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list-orig

# vi /etc/apt/sources.list


Better yet is putting them into a version control system.


> and I can't find any version of it online and ofcourse the apt-get is
> no longer working at all

Somebody already posted a Jessie file.  Here's my Wheezy file:

$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 7.8.0 _Wheezy_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD 
Binary-1 20150110-14:41]/ wheezy main


deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main

deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main

deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main

deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-backports main


David



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Jochen Spieker
Jose Martinez:
> 
> Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
> mozilla.debian.net repository??

I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)


J.
-- 
When you put a gun to my head you aren't fooling anyone.
[Agree]   [Disagree]
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Udyant Wig
On 01/14/2016 02:08 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
>
>> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
>>> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
>>> and I can't find any version of it online
>>
>> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
>> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
>
> Why not suggest a mirror which would be suitable for anyone, no matter
> what their location in the world is?
>
> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
> deb-src http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib

  I tried the redirector a while ago, but one mirror kept returning 403,
  necessitating reruns of apt(itude).  So, I switched to specific
  mirrors after that.  I haven't revisited using the redirector since
  then.

-- 
Udyant Wig
Software projects: https://github.com/udyant
Poetry: http://www.writing.com/main/portfolio/view/frosthrone



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Thursday 14 January 2016 00:10:17 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Jose Martinez:
> > Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
> > mozilla.debian.net repository??
>
> I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
> http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)

You beat me to it, Jochen!!

Lisi



Re: Problem with apt-get and sources.list

2016-01-13 Thread Jose Martinez



On 01/13/2016 06:10 PM, Jochen Spieker wrote:

Jose Martinez:


Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
mozilla.debian.net repository??


I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)


J.


Hmmm...What a novel idea!!

--
Que te vaya bien
JM



Problem to apt-get dist-upgrade

2015-08-20 Thread Magnus R

Dear all,

I run Debian Unstable. I haven't been able to do a

apt-get dist-upgrade

for some time now since it wants to remove some essential packages
which after upgrading is not installable anymore, for example konsole
and okular.

The output from apt-get dist-upgrade is:

Calculating upgrade... The following packages were automatically
installed and are no longer required:

g++-4.9 gstreamer1.0-plugins-base:i386 hdf5-helpers icu-devtools ipython isympy kdelibs-bin konsole-kpart liba52-0.7.4-dev libarpack2 libarpack2-dev libaudio2:i386 libavcodec-dev libavcodec-ffmpeg-extra56:i386 libavformat-dev libavresample-ffmpeg2:i386 libavutil-dev libavutil-ffmpeg54:i386 libblacs-mpi-dev libblacs-openmpi1 libblas-dev libboost-chrono-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-filesystem1.55.0 libboost-iostreams1.55.0 libboost-math-dev libboost-mpi-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-program-options1.55.0 libboost-regex1.58.0 libboost-serialization-dev libboost-thread1.55.0 libboost-timer-dev libbtf1.2.0 libcdparanoia0:i386 libcf0 libcsparse3.1.2 libcxsparse3.1.2 libdbusmenu-qt5-2 libdc1394-22-dev libdolfin1.5 libeigen3-dev libexiv2-14 libfaac-dev libfaad-dev libfftw3-mpi-dev libfftw3-mpi3 libfontconfig1-dev libfreetype6-dev libgl2ps-dev libgl2ps0 libgomp1:i386 libgsm1-dev libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0:i386 libgstreamer1.0-0:i386 libhdf5-8 libhdf5-cpp-8 libhdf5-dev 
libhdf5-mpi-dev libhdf5-openmpi-8 libhdf5-openmpi-dev libhypre-2.8.0b libhypre-dev libicu-dev libjs-jquery-ui libkf5attica5 libkf5auth-data libkf5auth5 libkf5bookmarks-data libkf5bookmarks5 libkf5codecs-data libkf5codecs5 libkf5completion-data libkf5completion5 libkf5config-bin libkf5config-data libkf5configcore5 libkf5configgui5 libkf5configwidgets-data libkf5configwidgets5 libkf5coreaddons-data libkf5coreaddons5 libkf5crash5 libkf5dbusaddons-bin libkf5dbusaddons-data libkf5dbusaddons5 libkf5globalaccel-bin libkf5globalaccel-data libkf5globalaccel5 libkf5globalaccelprivate5 libkf5guiaddons5 libkf5i18n-data libkf5i18n5 libkf5iconthemes-bin libkf5iconthemes-data libkf5iconthemes5 libkf5itemviews-data libkf5itemviews5 libkf5jobwidgets-data libkf5jobwidgets5 libkf5kdelibs4support-data libkf5kdelibs4support5 libkf5kdelibs4support5-bin libkf5kiocore5 libkf5kiofilewidgets5 libkf5kiowidgets5 libkf5notifications-data libkf5notifications5 libkf5notifyconfig-data libkf5notifyconfig5 libkf5par

ts-data libkf5parts-plugins libkf5parts5 libkf5pty-data libkf5pty5 
libkf5service-bin libkf5service-data libkf5service5 libkf5solid5 
libkf5solid5-data libkf5sonnet5-data libkf5sonnetcore5 libkf5sonnetui5 
libkf5textwidgets-data libkf5textwidgets5 libkf5widgetsaddons-data 
libkf5widgetsaddons5 libkf5windowsystem-data libkf5windowsystem5 
libkf5xmlgui-bin libkf5xmlgui-data libkf5xmlgui5 libkjsembed4 libklu1.2.1 
libkntlm4 libkrosscore4 liblapack-dev liblcms2-2:i386 libldl2.1.0 libmng1:i386 
libmp3lame-dev libmumps-4.10.0 libmumps-dev libnepomuk4 libnepomukquery4a 
libnepomukutils4 libnetcdf-dev libnetcdf7 libnetcdfc++4 libnetcdfc7 libnetcdff5 
libogg-dev libopencore-amrnb-dev libopencore-amrwb-dev liborc-0.4-dev 
libparpack2 libpetsc3.4.2 libpetsc3.4.2-dev libphonon4qt5-4 libpng12-dev 
libpolkit-qt5-1-1 libptscotch-5.1 libptscotch-dev libqt4-dbus:i386 
libqt4-network:i386 libqt4-opengl:i386 libqt4-xml:i386 libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 
libqt5core5a libqt5dbus5 libqt5gui5 libqt5network5 libqt5printsupp
ort5 libqt5script5 libqt5svg5 libqt5test5 libqt5widgets5 libqt5x11extras5 
libqt5xml5 libqtcore4:i386 libqtdbus4:i386 libqtgui4:i386 libqtwebkit4:i386 
libraw1394-dev libraw1394-tools libscalapack-mpi-dev libscalapack-openmpi1 
libschroedinger-dev libscotch-5.1 libscotch-dev libshine3:i386 libslepc3.4.2 
libslepc3.4.2-dev libsoxr0:i386 libspooles-dev libspooles2.2 libspqr1.3.1 
libsqlite3-0:i386 libssl1.0.0:i386 libsuitesparse-dev libsuperlu-dev 
libsuperlu4 libswresample-dev libswresample-ffmpeg1:i386 libswscale-dev 
libtheora-dev libtwolame0:i386 libvorbis-dev libvtk5-dev libvtk5-qt4-dev 
libvtk5.8 libvtk5.8-qt4 libwavpack1:i386 libwebp5:i386 libx264-146:i386 
libx264-dev libxcb-xkb1 libxft-dev libxkbcommon-x11-0 libxml2-dev libxss-dev 
libxt6:i386 libxv1:i386 libxvidcore-dev linux-headers-4.0.0-2-amd64 
linux-headers-4.0.0-2-common linux-image-4.0.0-2-amd64 linux-kbuild-4.0 
mpi-default-bin openmpi-bin pgadmin3-data pyro python-colorama python-dateutil 
python-decorator python-distlib python-
ffc python-fiat python-funcsigs python-gmpy python-instant python-matplotlib 
python-matplotlib-data python-mock python-mpmath python-netcdf python-pbr 
python-pip python-pmw python-pyglet python-pyx python-scientific 
python-scitools python-simplegeneric python-sympy python-tz python-ufl 
python-ufl-doc python-vtk python-wheel qttranslations5-l10n sonnet-plugins swig 
swig2.0 tcl-vtk tcl8.5-dev tk8.5-dev x11proto-scrnsaver-dev

Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.  Done

The following packages will be REMOVED:

dolfin-bin dolfin-doc fenics katepart kde-runtime kdelibs5-plugins 

Re: Problem to apt-get dist-upgrade

2015-08-20 Thread Joe
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:12:19 +0200 (CEST)
Magnus R mara...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear all,
 
 I run Debian Unstable. I haven't been able to do a
 
 apt-get dist-upgrade
 
 for some time now since it wants to remove some essential packages
 which after upgrading is not installable anymore, for example konsole
 and okular.
 

Yes.

 
 Is there anything I can do to fix this?

No.

 Or do I just have to wait
 until the packages I need are back to normal (that is installable).
 

Yes. There is a new revision of the C libraries available. It is not
compatible with [the existing compile state of] some of your current
packages, and some packages require it. If you want one of the new
packages, whether for installation or upgrade, the new libraries are
necessary, which in turn requires the removal of those packages which
won't work with it.

There is no way to satisfy the requirements, until the existing
incompatible packages are made to work with the new libraries. There's
probably only a small number directly involved, but the large web of
dependencies spreads the trouble to hundreds of packages.

If you have aptitude installed, and if you don't it's too late to
install the current version, you might try an aptitude full-upgrade.
This is equivalent to the apt-get dist-upgrade, but with better
dependency resolution. I don't think you will gain much, my aptitude
goes away and thinks for a while, and then gives up, something I've
never seen happen before. It offers to spend longer looking, but it
isn't going to find an answer.

I presume you are still doing an apt-get upgrade, which should deal
with most of the packages which aren't involved in the current mess. I'm
seeing aptitude safe-upgrade working for twenty to thirty packages a
day. You might, with very careful cherry-picking, manage another two or
three, which I was doing using Synaptic. I've given up now, as it's not
worth wading through over two hundred to find a couple which work.

-- 
Joe




Re: Problem to apt-get dist-upgrade

2015-08-20 Thread Sven Hartge
Magnus R mara...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is there anything I can do to fix this? Or do I just have to wait
 until the packages I need are back to normal (that is installable).

There are several very big libary and compiler transitions going on at
the moment.

You can upgrade upgradable packages by using only apt upgrade instead
of dist-upgrade, but other than that you just have to wait.

Grüße,
Sven.

-- 
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.



Re: Problem to apt-get dist-upgrade

2015-08-20 Thread Magnus R

Is there anything I can do to fix this? Or do I just have to wait
until the packages I need are back to normal (that is installable).


There are several very big libary and compiler transitions going on at
the moment.

You can upgrade upgradable packages by using only apt upgrade instead
of dist-upgrade, but other than that you just have to wait.


Ok that is what I suspected. Thank you so much!

Cheers,

Magnus



Grüße,
Sven.

--
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.



Re: problem with apt-get upgrade

2012-03-16 Thread Darac Marjal
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:40:10PM +, Richard wrote:
 Hi
 All downloads , but I'm getting this:-
 
 Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-22) ...
 insserv: warning: script 'K50vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and 
 overrides
 insserv: warning: script 'K01vmware' missing LSB tags and overrides
 insserv: warning: script 'vmware' missing LSB tags and overrides
 insserv: warning: script 'vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and overrides
 insserv: There is a loop at service minissdpd if started
 insserv: Starting vmware-USBArbitrator depends on minissdpd and therefore on 
 system facility `$all' which can not be true!
 
 The last line scrolls down the page.
 Do I need to uninstall vmware to get this to run ?

No.

You have two options. First is to install a version of VMWare that
supports the (now just about standard) initscript headers. If there is
no such version, pester the upstream authors to update their
initscripts.

Second is to create an override, so that you add the headers manually.
That is, create a file /etc/insserv/overrides/FOO (where FOO is the name
of the initscipt being run. Note, not the symlink name. If K01vmware
points to /etc/init.d/vmware, then create
/etc/insserv/overrides/vmware). In that file, write your initscript
header (see http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts for details). You
should then be able to update your system.


-- 
Darac Marjal


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120316105248.ga7...@darac.org.uk



Re: problem with apt-get upgrade

2012-03-16 Thread Richard
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:52:48 +
Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote:

 On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:40:10PM +, Richard wrote:
  Hi
  All downloads , but I'm getting this:-
  
  Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-22) ...
  insserv: warning: script 'K50vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and 
  overrides
  insserv: warning: script 'K01vmware' missing LSB tags and overrides
  insserv: warning: script 'vmware' missing LSB tags and overrides
  insserv: warning: script 'vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and 
  overrides
  insserv: There is a loop at service minissdpd if started
  insserv: Starting vmware-USBArbitrator depends on minissdpd and therefore 
  on system facility `$all'
  which can not be true!
  
  The last line scrolls down the page.
  Do I need to uninstall vmware to get this to run ?
 
 No.
 
 You have two options. First is to install a version of VMWare that
 supports the (now just about standard) initscript headers. If there is
 no such version, pester the upstream authors to update their
 initscripts.
 
 Second is to create an override, so that you add the headers manually.
 That is, create a file /etc/insserv/overrides/FOO (where FOO is the name
 of the initscipt being run. Note, not the symlink name. If K01vmware
 points to /etc/init.d/vmware, then create
 /etc/insserv/overrides/vmware). In that file, write your initscript
 header (see http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts for details). You
 should then be able to update your system.
 
 

Many thanks the second option has helped.
Vmware have been very slow to update to kernel3, so there are various patches 
around.

Cheers

-- 


Best wishes / 73
Richard Bown

e-mail: rich...@g8jvm.com   or   richard.b...@blueyonder.co.uk

nil carborundum a illegitemis
##
Ham Call G8JVM . OS Debian Wheezy/Sid amd64 on a Dual core AMD Athlon 5200, 4 
GB RAM
Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W ( degs mins )
QRV HF + VHF Microwave 23 cms:140W,13 cms:100W,6 cms:10W  3 cms:5W
##
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120316122852.76448...@g8jvm.com



problem with apt-get upgrade

2012-03-15 Thread Richard
Hi
All downloads , but I'm getting this:-

Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-22) ...
insserv: warning: script 'K50vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and 
overrides
insserv: warning: script 'K01vmware' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: warning: script 'vmware' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: warning: script 'vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: There is a loop at service minissdpd if started
insserv: Starting vmware-USBArbitrator depends on minissdpd and therefore on 
system facility `$all' which can not be true!

The last line scrolls down the page.
Do I need to uninstall vmware to get this to run ?
-- 


Best wishes / 73
Richard Bown

e-mail: rich...@g8jvm.com   or   richard.b...@blueyonder.co.uk

nil carborundum a illegitemis
##
Ham Call G8JVM . OS Debian Wheezy/Sid amd64 on a Dual core AMD Athlon 5200, 4 
GB RAM
Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W ( degs mins )
QRV HF + VHF Microwave 23 cms:140W,13 cms:100W,6 cms:10W  3 cms:5W
##
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120315214010.4914a...@g8jvm.com



SOLVED - Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-16 Thread Lisi
On Friday 15 April 2011 23:49:24 Christian Jakob wrote:
 Can anyone change status of this post to SOLVED ?!

You can - just add SOLVED to the subject line!!  It is usually put at the 
beginning.

I have done it for you.  It is no more complicated than it is to start the 
thread in the first place, when you typed the subject.

Lisi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201104160721.31457.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-15 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
(TOFU corrected.  In general, this list prefers well-trimmed posts with 
replies interleaved or underneath the quoted context.  Some prefer top-
posting, but I think everyone with an opinion desires posts to be well-
trimmed.)

In 998647986.2435386.1302844626401.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb033, Christian 
Jakob wrote:
In 1038309152.3627061.1302793651098.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb038, Christian 

Jakob wrote:
fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...

root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
E: Paket aptitude hat keinen Installationskandidaten

When posting error messages to the list, please use the untranslated
versions.   You can do this for a single command by prefixing it with
LC_ALL=C . You can do this for all commands in the rest of your shell by
doing (export LC_ALL=C).

What the hell ...?

I think you need to run (apt-get update) now. Please post
the output of the 
update run as well as the contents of /etc/apt/sources.list and 
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
root@debian # apt-get update

Okay, that output looks fine.

root@debian # apt-get upgrade

Same here.

root@debian # grep deb /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib
deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib
deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib
root@debian # ls /etc/apt/sources.list.d/

Okay, sane.

What does (apt-cache policy) and (apt-cache policy aptitude) show?  Can you 
also post the output of (apt-get install aptitude) non-i18n-ized?

I'm suspecting some odd problems under /var/lib/apt or /var/cache at this 
point, but those outputs will help further diagnose.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-15 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 14/04/11 15:46, Christian Jakob wrote:
 Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
 scons and posting the output?
 
 root@debian # dpkg -i scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb
snipped
Selecting previously deselected package scons.
(Reading database ... 175 901 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking scons (from scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb) ...
Setting up a scons (1.0.0-1) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...?

 
 root@debian # dpkg -l |grep scons
 ii scons 1.0.0-1 A replacement for Make
 
 root @debian # cat /var/log/dpkg.log | more
 2011-04-11 20:00:20 startup archives install
 2011-04-11 20:00:35 upgrade apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:35 status half-configured apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2

Current version of apt (not sure when it was last updated)


 2011-04-11 20:00:35 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:35 status half-installed apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:36 status triggers-pending man-db 2.5.2-4
 2011-04-11 20:00:36 status half-installed apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:36 status half-installed apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 configure apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 status half-configured apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 status triggers-awaited apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 trigproc man-db 2.5.2-4 2.5.2-4
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 status half-configured man-db 2.5.2-4
 2011-04-11 20:00:37 status installed apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2

Nothing to indicate that the upgrade of apt failed.

 2011-04-11 20:00:38 status installed man-db 2.5.2-4
 2011-04-14 07:35:25 startup archives install
 2011-04-14 07:35:40 install scons keine 1.0.0-1
 2011-04-14 07:35:40 status half-installed scons 1.0.0-1
 2011-04-14 07:35:41 status triggers-pending man-db 2.5.2-4
 2011-04-14 07:35:41 status half-installed scons 1.0.0-1
 2011-04-14 07:35:41 status unpacked scons 1.0.0-1
 2011-04-14 07:35:41 status unpacked scons 1.0.0-1
 2011-04-14 07:35:41 configure scons 1.0.0-1 1.0.0-1
 2011-04-14 07:35:41 status unpacked scons 1.0.0-1
 2011-04-14 07:35:41 status half-configured scons 1.0.0-1
 2011-04-14 07:35:42 status triggers-awaited scons 1.0.0-1
 2011-04-14 07:35:42 trigproc man-db 2.5.2-4 2.5.2-4
 2011-04-14 07:35:42 status half-configured man-db 2.5.2-4
 2011-04-14 07:35:42 status installed scons 1.0.0-1
 2011-04-14 07:35:43 status installed man-db 2.5.2-4

scons installed fine...

 
 ... if it helps ...
 
 Last time I send a message S.M.A.R.T. was disabled, this time it is enabled. 
 I realize no difference.
You won't realize any difference ;-p

It's my english :-D
I asked if you had SMART enabled - if you'd said yes (and you had the
appropriate software installed), I'd have asked you to run smartctl and
post the results. No matter.

I'm thinking this is not a hardware based problem.

snipped
Cheers

-- 
Tuttle? His name's Buttle.
There must be some mistake.
Mistake? [Chuckles]
We don't make mistakes.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da7eb5d.10...@gmail.com



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-15 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 15/04/11 01:07, Christian Jakob wrote:
 fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...

Um, fsck did what?
Did it simply optimise directories - or did the file system need repairing?
Did it test the ability of the drive to retain data - find some sections
where failing and add them to the list of bad sectors?

If it was the last option - then the cause of the apt database error may
be due to a failing hard drive - in which case abandon the hard drive.
But if checking with fsck (and SMART) doesn't show a failing hard drive
- then the database simply needs rebuilding.


 
 root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
 root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
snipped and translated
Reading package lists ... Finish
Building dependency tree
Reading state information ... Finish
aptitude package is not available, but from another
package referenced. This may mean that the package is missing, that obsolete
or is only available from another source.
E: aptitude package has no installation candidate

 
 What the hell ...?

Sounds like you've been mixing repositories


 
 Does anyone knows where I can ask a specialist? Maybe in another mailinglist?
 I do NOT want to install everthing manually with dpkg-command...
 And I do NOT want to remove apt manually...


I'm not sure why you are trying to install/remove apt, when you already
have it installed, and the original problem was being unable to install
*scons*

The progam apt is installed, and appears to work properly - the
information it gives you when you asked it to install scons, was wrong.

 
 Christian.
 ___

Cheers

-- 
Tuttle? His name's Buttle.
There must be some mistake.
Mistake? [Chuckles]
We don't make mistakes.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da7eba5.6000...@gmail.com



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-15 Thread Christian Jakob
TO: scot..

Um, fsck did what?

First there came a WARNING: sd2 is mounted ... blabla
Then something like this:

/dev/sda2: recovering journal
/dev/sda2: clean, ... files, ... blocks

For me this looked like fsck didn't do anything...
But, I think there is no hardware problem, so forget it!

Did it simply optimise directories - or did the file system need repairing?
Did it test the ability of the drive to retain data - find some sections
where failing and add them to the list of bad sectors?

No nothing (see above), only this 2 lines as output.

 root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
 root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
snipped and translated
Reading package lists ... Finish
Building dependency tree
Reading state information ... Finish
aptitude package is not available, but from another
package referenced. This may mean that the package is missing, that obsolete
or is only available from another source.
E: aptitude package has no installation candidate

 
 What the hell ...?

Sounds like you've been mixing repositories

Normally I used aptitude to install or upgrade packages, then I decided to 
remove aptitude, only for testing, if apt-cache remove works ... and it works ;)
At the moment, I first have to solve the apt problem before install aptitude 
again...

I'm not sure why you are trying to install/remove apt, when you already
have it installed, and the original problem was being unable to install
*scons*

No, the original problem was install problems with apt in general (see topic).
scons was only an example...
Ok, for everyone again: I can not install anything with apt, but I can install 
everthing with dpkg -i. ok?

The progam apt is installed, and appears to work properly - the
information it gives you when you asked it to install scons, was wrong.

No, apperently it works not properly, because I can NOT install ANYTHING with 
apt.
With EVERY package, that is not installed on my machine, there is the same 
message:

root@debian # apt-get install ANYTHING
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package htop is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package htop has no installation candidate

(with ANYTHING I mean any package, that is not installed yet on my machine)

I hope this is clear now. Maybe I did not convey this fact exactly. Sorry for 
that.



TO: boyd stephen..

What does (apt-cache policy) and (apt-cache policy aptitude) show?

root@debian # apt-cache policy
Package files:
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  release a=now
  -1 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Packages
  release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian-Security,c=contrib
  origin security.debian.org
  -1 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages
  release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian-Security,c=main
  origin security.debian.org
  -1 http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/contrib Packages
  release v=5.0.8,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian,c=contrib
  origin ftp.de.debian.org
  -1 http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Packages
  release v=5.0.8,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian,c=main
  origin ftp.de.debian.org
Pinned packages:
  flashplugin-nonfree - (not found)
root@debian # apt-cache policy aptitude
aptitude:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: (none)
  Version table:
  0.4.11.11-1~lenny1 0
  -1 http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Packages

Can you also post the output of (apt-get install aptitude) non-i18n-ized?

If you tell me how to do this, then YES.


Regards,

Christian.

___
Schon gehört? WEB.DE hat einen genialen Phishing-Filter in die
Toolbar eingebaut! http://produkte.web.de/go/toolbar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/406058322.9701.1302882000282.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb034



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-15 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In 406058322.9701.1302882000282.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb034, Christian Jakob 
wrote:
root@debian # apt-cache policy
Package files:
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  release a=now
  -1 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Packages
  release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian-Security,c=contrib
  origin security.debian.org
  -1 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages
  release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian-Security,c=main
  origin security.debian.org
  -1 http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/contrib Packages
  release v=5.0.8,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian,c=contrib
  origin ftp.de.debian.org
  -1 http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Packages
  release v=5.0.8,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian,c=main
  origin ftp.de.debian.org
Pinned packages:
  flashplugin-nonfree - (not found)

You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value.  APT 
refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none of 
your packages have installation candidates.

Check /etc/apt/preferences and /etc/apt/preferences.d/*; you've got at least 
on stanza wrong in them.  (man 5 apt_preferences) for the available 
documentation.

If you can't fix them, try deleting them.  With as few repositories as you 
have, preferences won't matter too much, if at all.  They are mainly used for 
maintaining mixed systems.

root@debian # apt-cache policy aptitude
aptitude:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: (none)
  Version table:
  0.4.11.11-1~lenny1 0
  -1 http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Packages

Can you also post the output of (apt-get install aptitude) non-i18n-ized?

If you tell me how to do this, then YES.

Nevermind, you posted it for htop, and that is sufficient for me to confirm 
what I thought was wrong.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-15 Thread Christian Jakob
You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value. APT 
refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none of 
your packages have installation candidates.

Check /etc/apt/preferences and /etc/apt/preferences.d/*; you've got at least 
on stanza wrong in them. (man 5 apt_preferences) for the available 
documentation.

Wow, I changed values in /etc/apt/preferences to 501 and voila:

root@debian # apt-get install htop
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  htop
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 105 not upgraded.
Need to get 46.8kB of archives.
After this operation, 180kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main htop 0.7-1 [46.8kB]
Fetched 46.8kB in 0s (161kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package htop.
(Reading database ... 176091 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking htop (from .../archives/htop_0.7-1_i386.deb) ...
Processing triggers for menu ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up htop (0.7-1) ...
Processing triggers for menu ...
 
Yeeh!
Thank you very very much Boyd Stephen!

There is only one question left:
Why did this happen? What could I have done, that these values changed to -1?


Regards,

Christian.



___
Schon gehört? WEB.DE hat einen genialen Phishing-Filter in die
Toolbar eingebaut! http://produkte.web.de/go/toolbar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1393449085.44289.1302886728608.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb037



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-15 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In 1393449085.44289.1302886728608.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb037, Christian Jakob 
wrote:
You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value. APT 
refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none
of  your packages have installation candidates.

Check /etc/apt/preferences and /etc/apt/preferences.d/*; you've got at
least  on stanza wrong in them. (man 5 apt_preferences) for the available
documentation.

Wow, I changed values in /etc/apt/preferences to 501 and voila:


There is only one question left:
Why did this happen? What could I have done, that these values changed to
-1?

I don't know any tool that edits that file.  I always edit it with (sudo -e 
/etc/apt/preferences).  So, my assumption is that you made the change 
yourself, perhaps without knowing the results.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-15 Thread Christian Jakob
There is only one question left:
Why did this happen? What could I have done, that these values changed to
-1?

I don't know any tool that edits that file. I always edit it with (sudo -e
/etc/apt/preferences). So, my assumption is that you made the change
yourself, perhaps without knowing the results.

I definitely NOT changed anything in the /etc/apt/preferences before!
(because I'm a noob and don't know about this file before ;) 

But thanks for your help!

Can anyone change status of this post to SOLVED ?!

Thx


Christian.
___
Empfehlen Sie WEB.DE DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir   
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.web.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1831017358.154709.1302907764303.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb040



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-14 Thread Christian Jakob
Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
scons and posting the output?

root@debian # dpkg -i scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb
Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket scons.
(Lese Datenbank ... 175901 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.)
Entpacke scons (aus scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb) ...
Richte scons ein (1.0.0-1) ...
Verarbeite Trigger für man-db ...?

root@debian # dpkg -l |grep scons
ii scons 1.0.0-1 A replacement for Make

root @debian # cat /var/log/dpkg.log | more
2011-04-11 20:00:20 startup archives install
2011-04-11 20:00:35 upgrade apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:35 status half-configured apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:35 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:35 status half-installed apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:36 status triggers-pending man-db 2.5.2-4
2011-04-11 20:00:36 status half-installed apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:36 status half-installed apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:37 configure apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:37 status unpacked apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:37 status half-configured apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:37 status triggers-awaited apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:37 trigproc man-db 2.5.2-4 2.5.2-4
2011-04-11 20:00:37 status half-configured man-db 2.5.2-4
2011-04-11 20:00:37 status installed apt 0.7.20.2+lenny2
2011-04-11 20:00:38 status installed man-db 2.5.2-4
2011-04-14 07:35:25 startup archives install
2011-04-14 07:35:40 install scons keine 1.0.0-1
2011-04-14 07:35:40 status half-installed scons 1.0.0-1
2011-04-14 07:35:41 status triggers-pending man-db 2.5.2-4
2011-04-14 07:35:41 status half-installed scons 1.0.0-1
2011-04-14 07:35:41 status unpacked scons 1.0.0-1
2011-04-14 07:35:41 status unpacked scons 1.0.0-1
2011-04-14 07:35:41 configure scons 1.0.0-1 1.0.0-1
2011-04-14 07:35:41 status unpacked scons 1.0.0-1
2011-04-14 07:35:41 status half-configured scons 1.0.0-1
2011-04-14 07:35:42 status triggers-awaited scons 1.0.0-1
2011-04-14 07:35:42 trigproc man-db 2.5.2-4 2.5.2-4
2011-04-14 07:35:42 status half-configured man-db 2.5.2-4
2011-04-14 07:35:42 status installed scons 1.0.0-1
2011-04-14 07:35:43 status installed man-db 2.5.2-4

... if it helps ...

Last time I send a message S.M.A.R.T. was disabled, this time it is enabled. I 
realize no difference.

I'll try fsck next time I restart the machine.

Thank you.

Christian.


___
Empfehlen Sie WEB.DE DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir   
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.web.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1983931471.1874498.1302759996308.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb033



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-14 Thread Christian Jakob
fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...

root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
Paket aptitude ist nicht verfügbar, wird aber von einem anderen
Paket referenziert. Das kann heißen, dass das Paket fehlt, dass es veraltet
ist oder nur aus einer anderen Quelle verfügbar ist.
E: Paket aptitude hat keinen Installationskandidaten

What the hell ...?

Does anyone knows where I can ask a specialist? Maybe in another mailinglist?
I do NOT want to install everthing manually with dpkg-command...
And I do NOT want to remove apt manually...

Christian.
___
Empfehlen Sie WEB.DE DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir   
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.web.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1038309152.3627061.1302793651098.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb038



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-14 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In 1038309152.3627061.1302793651098.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb038, Christian 
Jakob wrote:
fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...

root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
Paket aptitude ist nicht verfügbar, wird aber von einem anderen
Paket referenziert. Das kann heißen, dass das Paket fehlt, dass es veraltet
ist oder nur aus einer anderen Quelle verfügbar ist.
E: Paket aptitude hat keinen Installationskandidaten

When posting error messages to the list, please use the untranslated versions.  
You can do this for a single command by prefixing it with LC_ALL=C .  You 
can do this for all commands in the rest of your shell by doing (export 
LC_ALL=C).

What the hell ...?

I think you need to run (apt-get update) now.  Please post the output of the 
update run as well as the contents of /etc/apt/sources.list and 
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-14 Thread Christian Jakob
root@debian # apt-get update
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny Release.gpg
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny Release
Ign http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Sources/DiffIndex
Ign http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Sources/DiffIndex
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Sources
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Sources
Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/contrib Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Sources/DiffIndex
Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/contrib Sources/DiffIndex
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Packages
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/contrib Packages
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Sources
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/contrib Sources
Reading package lists... Done

root@debian # apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

root@debian # grep deb /etc/apt/sources.list
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r2 _Etch_ - Official i386 NETINST Binary-1 
20080103-00:44]/ etch contrib main
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r2 _Etch_ - Official i386 NETINST Binary-1 
20080103-00:44]/ etch contrib main
#deb http://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/debian/debian/ lenny main contrib 
non-free
#deb-src http://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/debian/debian/ lenny main contrib 
non-free
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib
deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib
deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib
#deb http://deb.opera.com/opera lenny non-free
#deb http://www.backports.org/debian lenny-backports main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://www.backports.org/debian etch-backports main contrib non-free
#deb http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian stable main
#deb-src http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian stable main
#deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ stable main
#deb http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian stable main contrib non-free 
restricted
root@debian # ls /etc/apt/sources.list.d/
root@debian # grep deb /etc/apt/sources.list.backup
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r2 _Etch_ - Official i386 NETINST Binary-1 
20080103-00:44]/ etch contrib main
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r2 _Etch_ - Official i386 NETINST Binary-1 
20080103-00:44]/ etch contrib main
deb http://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/debian/debian/ oldstable main contrib 
non-free
deb-src http://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/debian/debian/ oldstable main 
contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ oldstable/updates main contrib
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ oldstable/updates main contrib
#deb http://www.backports.org/debian etch-backports main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://www.backports.org/debian etch-backports main contrib non-free
#deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-volatile/ etch/volatile main
#deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile etch/volatile main contrib 
non-free
#deb http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian stable main
#deb-src http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian stable main
#deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ stable main
#deb http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian stable main contrib non-free 
restricted
root@debian # grep deb /etc/apt/sources.list~
root@debian # 

Regards,

Christian


old message 

In 1038309152.3627061.1302793651098.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb038, Christian 
Jakob wrote:
fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...

root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
Paket aptitude ist nicht verfügbar, wird aber von einem anderen
Paket referenziert. Das kann heißen, dass das Paket fehlt, dass es veraltet
ist oder nur aus einer anderen Quelle verfügbar ist.
E: Paket aptitude hat keinen Installationskandidaten

When posting error messages to the list, please use the untranslated versions.  
You can do this for a single command by prefixing it with LC_ALL=C . You 
can do this for all commands in the rest of your shell by doing (export 
LC_ALL=C).

What the hell ...?

I think you need to run (apt-get update) now. Please post the output of the 
update run as well as the contents of /etc/apt/sources.list and 
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: 

Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-13 Thread Christian Jakob
Had you temporarily used other repositories around that time?

No, /etc/apt/sources.list~ is empty.

The dependencies for scons are python... could it be that you have some
non-standard python on your system??
Occasionally I've had install problems because I'd forgotten that I'd
temporarily make python2.4 the system default... but surely that would
not be your problem(?)

root@debian # dpkg -l | grep python
ii gimp-python 2.4.7-1 Python support and plugins for GIMP
rc libboost-python1.33.1 1.33.1-10 Boost.Python Library
ii libboost-python1.34.1 1.34.1-14 Boost.Python Library
ii python 2.5.2-3 An interactive high-level object-oriented la
ii python-apt 0.7.7.1+nmu1 Python interface to libapt-pkg
ii python-cairo 1.4.12-1.2 Python bindings for the Cairo vector graphic
ii python-central 0.6.8 register and build utility for Python packag
ii python-dbus 0.82.4-2 simple interprocess messaging system (Python
ii python-eggtrayicon 2.19.1-3.1 Python module to display icons in the system
ii python-elementtree 1.2.6-12 Light-weight toolkit for XML processing
ii python-foomatic 0.7.9.1 Python interface to the Foomatic printer dat
ii python-gdata 1.1.1-1 Google Data Python client library
ii python-glade2 2.12.1-6 GTK+ bindings: Glade support
ii python-gmenu 2.22.2-4 an implementation of the freedesktop menu sp
ii python-gnome2 2.22.0-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desktop enviro
ii python-gnome2-desktop 2.22.0-2 Python bindings for the GNOME desktop enviro
ii python-gnupginterface 0.3.2-9 Python interface to GnuPG (GPG)
ii python-gobject 2.14.2-2 Python bindings for the GObject library
ii python-gtk2 2.12.1-6 Python bindings for the GTK+ widget set
ii python-gtkhtml2 2.19.1-3.1 Python bindings for the GtkHTML 2 library
ii python-gtkmozembed 2.19.1-3.1 Python bindings for the GtkMozEmbed Gecko li
ii python-gtksourceview2 2.2.0-1+b1 Python bindings for the GtkSourceView widget
ii python-imaging 1.1.6-3 Python Imaging Library
ii python-imaging-tk 1.1.6-3 Python Imaging Library - ImageTk Module
ii python-ipy 1:0.62-1 Python module for handling IPv4 and IPv6 add
ii python-libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-5+lenny3 Python bindings for the GNOME XML library
ii python-minimal 2.5.2-3 A minimal subset of the Python language (def
ii python-newt 0.52.2-11.3+lenny1 A NEWT module for Python
ii python-notify 0.1.1-2+b1 Python bindings for libnotify
ii python-numeric 24.2-9 Numerical (matrix-oriented) Mathematics for
ii python-pyorbit 2.14.3-2 A Python language binding for the ORBit2 COR
ii python-selinux 2.0.65-5 Python bindings to SELinux shared libraries
ii python-semanage 2.0.25-3 Python bindings for SELinux policy manipula
ii python-sepolgen 1.0.11-5 A Python module used in SELinux policy gener
ii python-software-properties 0.60.debian-1.1 manage the repositories that you 
install sof
ii python-support 0.8.4lenny2 automated rebuilding support for Python modu
ii python-tk 2.5.2-1 Tkinter - Writing Tk applications with Pytho
rc python-twisted-core 8.1.0-4 Event-based framework for internet applicati
ii python-vte 1:0.16.14-4 Python bindings for the VTE widget set
rc python2.4 2.4.6-1 An interactive high-level object-oriented la
rc python2.4-minimal 2.4.6-1 A minimal subset of the Python language (ver
ii python2.5 2.5.2-15+lenny1 An interactive high-level object-oriented la
ii python2.5-minimal 2.5.2-15+lenny1 A minimal subset of the Python language 
(ver

work:/home/scott# dpkg -l |grep python2.5
ii python2.5 2.5.2-15+lenny1
 An interactive high-level object-oriented language (version 2.
ii python2.5-minimal 2.5.2-15+lenny1
 A minimal subset of the Python language (version 2.5)

scott@work:~$ python -V
Python 2.5.2

this is the same as mine...

root@debian # python -V
Python 2.5.2

Have you manually installed scons?
Did it throw up any errors?

No I did not try to install scons before.

I strongly suspect the problems is software based - when I've had
hardware based problems with apt there have been plenty of error messages...

I confirm your opinion, it should be a software based problem.
Let's go back to your first e-mail:

The only things I can think of are:-
;temporary problem with the repository (it certainly works at the time
of writing this)
;your apt database is corrupted
;weird dependency problem/conflicts

I think the problem is either corrupted database or dependency problems of 
apt-get.
By the way:

root@debian # apt-get moo
  (__)
  (oo)
  /--\/
  / | ||
 * /\---/\
  ~~ ~~
Have you mooed today?...

If you have the minimal python requirements then, short of suggestions
from others, I'd propose that the cause may be a hardware failure.

...

It's Theodore Ts’o's handler for file system checks - usually runs
automagically every x number of boots. It'll show in dmesg if there's
been a problem.

I searched in /var/log/dmesg for error, failure and abort - found 
nothing...

A hard drive monitoring system:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.

If your hard drive supports it, and it's enabled in your BIOS, then it
can be 

Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-13 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 14/04/11 02:59, Christian Jakob wrote:
snipped
 scott@work:~$ python -V
 Python 2.5.2
 
 this is the same as mine...
 
 root@debian # python -V
 Python 2.5.2


You appear to have all the listed dependancies
 
 Have you manually installed scons?
 Did it throw up any errors?
 
 No I did not try to install scons before.


What happens if you try and install it now? eg:-


 
 I strongly suspect the problems is software based - when I've had
 hardware based problems with apt there have been plenty of error messages...
 
 I confirm your opinion, it should be a software based problem.
 Let's go back to your first e-mail:
 
 The only things I can think of are:-
 ;temporary problem with the repository (it certainly works at the time
 of writing this)
 ;your apt database is corrupted
 ;weird dependency problem/conflicts
 
 I think the problem is either corrupted database or dependency problems of 
 apt-get.
 By the way:
 
 root@debian # apt-get moo
   (__)
   (oo)
   /--\/
   / | ||
  * /\---/\
   ~~ ~~
 Have you mooed today?...


:-)
To which the only possible reply is (despite my preference for apt-get):-

# aptitude -v moo


 
 If you have the minimal python requirements then, short of suggestions
from others, I'd propose that the cause may be a hardware failure.

 ...

 It's Theodore Ts’o's handler for file system checks - usually runs
 automagically every x number of boots. It'll show in dmesg if there's
 been a problem.
 
 I searched in /var/log/dmesg for error, failure and abort - found 
 nothing...

Then an fsck failure shouldn't have occurred you can try running it
manually from single-mode on next reboot. Difficult for me to advise on
how without knowing your partitioning and filesystems - but man fsck is
your friend ;-p

 
 A hard drive monitoring system:-
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.

 If your hard drive supports it, and it's enabled in your BIOS, then it
 can be useful to determine if your hdd is failing.

 NOTE: I don't propose that you need SMART to solve this problem, it's
 just another place I look for useful error messages when I'm trying to
 determine if a fault is hardware or software based.
 
 I'll check BIOS settings during next restart and report in the next message.
 I don't think it's an hardware problem, but maybe I'm wrong.
 
 P.S. I tried to install apt with the deb package manually, nothing has 
 changed, same problem.
 By now I think of something like
 
 apt-cache remove apt 
 dpkg -i apt_0.7.20.2+lenny2_i386.deb
 
 to solve the problem ... :D

Um, I've never tried to replace apt on a running machine, so I can't
advise. If I did I'd certainly use the -d switch first so that at least
I'd have a local copy of the .deb file/s.

Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
scons and posting the output?

eg:-
wget -t 0
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/scons/scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb;
dpkg -i scons*all.deb


 
 How can I find out, when the last apt-get upgrade or apt-get install was 
 successful?

cat /var/log/dpkg.log | more

dpkg has various options that will give you subsets of the same log.

snipped to save electrons

Cheers


-- 
Tuttle? His name's Buttle.
There must be some mistake.
Mistake? [Chuckles]
We don't make mistakes.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da64081.1030...@gmail.com



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-12 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 12/04/11 15:38, Christian Jakob wrote:
 Good morning,
 
snipped
 
 No, the problem occurs since a few weeks/months and not only with this 
 package...


There's the clue.
If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
about
fsck lately?
Are you running SMART?
(I have no clues as to your hardware or setup, and whether it's relevant)
what does:-
apt-get -sf install
give?


 I can NOT install ANY package with apt-get, 
 but I CAN install any package manually with dpkg -i packagename.deb.
 I can NOT upgrade the system with apt-get upgrade.
 I have no non-Lenny perl on my system.
 
 If it helps: I can remove packages with apt-cache --purge remove packagename
 I can search packages with apt-cache search packagename.

Tells me apt is working - but doesn't rule out a corrupted database


 
 Please give me further hints/allusions to the source of the problem!

See above for a start on isolation testing

snipped

Cheers

 
 -- 
 Tuttle? His name's Buttle.
 There must be some mistake.
 Mistake? [Chuckles]
 We don't make mistakes.
 
 
 
 ___
 WEB.DE DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 euro;/mtl.! Jetzt mit 
 gratis Handy-Flat! http://produkte.web.de/go/DSL_Doppel_Flatrate/2
 
 


-- 
Tuttle? His name's Buttle.
There must be some mistake.
Mistake? [Chuckles]
We don't make mistakes.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da40069.5020...@gmail.com



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-12 Thread Christian Jakob
Ok, first of all: Thank you for helping me!

There's the clue.
If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
about

Yes, I can not remember what I did wrong last time I used Debian.
Maybe it is important to say, that I have 2 system running on my machine.
1. Debian (stable, for backups and open-source-software testing)
2. Windows (for gaming and reinstalling every year^^)
I did not use Debian for a while (several weeks/months), but now I need it
for my work.
This is why I do not remember what I changed on the system last time I used 
it...

In your last post you gave me the hint with perl and I checked it...
Maybe this is the source of the problem, because as I know apt uses perl 
somehow...?!
... sorry for the long list :( ...

root@debian# dpkg -l |grep perl
ii gnuift-perl 0.1.14-9 GNU Image Finding Tool - perl modules
ii libauthen-sasl-perl 2.12-1 Authen::SASL - SASL Authentication framework
ii libbit-vector-perl 6.4-7+b1 Perl and C library for bit vectors and more
ii libcairo-perl 1.060-1 Perl interface to the Cairo graphics library
ii libcarp-clan-perl 6.00-1 Perl enhancement to Carp error logging facil
ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.31-2 Automated accessor generator
ii libclass-singleton-perl 1.03-7 perl Class::Singleton - Implementation of a
ii libcompress-raw-zlib-perl 2.012-1lenny1 low-level interface to zlib 
compression libr
ii libcompress-zlib-perl 2.012-1 Perl module for creation and manipulation of
ii libconfig-tiny-perl 2.12-1 Read/Write .ini style files with as little c
ii libconvert-binhex-perl 1.119+pristine-3 Perl5 module for extracting data 
from macint
ii libcrypt-ssleay-perl 0.57-1+b1 Support for https protocol in LWP
ii libdate-calc-perl 5.4-5+b1 Perl library for accessing dates
ii libdate-manip-perl 5.54-1 a perl library for manipulating dates
ii libdatetime-locale-perl 1:0.35-1+1.5.0 perl DateTime::Locale - Localization 
support
ii libdatetime-perl 2:0.42-1 perl DateTime - Reference implementation for
ii libdatetime-timezone-perl 1:0.77.01-1+2008c perl DateTime::TimeZone - Time 
zone object b
ii libdebian-package-make-perl 0.04 Perl modules for automatically generating De
ii libdevel-symdump-perl 2.08-1 Perl module for inspecting perl's symbol tab
ii libdigest-hmac-perl 1.01-7 create standard message integrity checks
ii libdigest-sha1-perl 2.11-2+b1 NIST SHA-1 message digest algorithm
ii libfcgi-perl 0.67-2.1+b1 FastCGI Perl module
ii libfile-copy-recursive-perl 0.36-1 Perl extension for recursively copying 
files
ii libfile-find-rule-perl 0.30-3 Alternative interface to File::Find
ii libfile-remove-perl 1.42-1 remove files and directories, accepts wildca
ii libfinance-quote-perl 1.13-3+lenny1 Perl module for retrieving stock quotes 
from
ii libfont-afm-perl 1.20-1 Font::AFM - Interface to Adobe Font Metrics
ii libglib-perl 1:1.190-2 Perl interface to the GLib and GObject libra
ii libgnome2-canvas-perl 1.002-1+b2 Perl interface to the GNOME canvas library
ii libgnome2-perl 1.042-1+b1 Perl interface to the GNOME libraries
ii libgnome2-vfs-perl 1.080-1+b1 Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOM
ii libgtk2-perl 1:1.190-1 Perl interface to the 2.x series of the Gimp
ii libhtml-format-perl 2.04-2 format HTML syntax trees into text, PostScri
ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.56-1+lenny1 A collection of modules that parse HTML 
text
ii libhtml-tableextract-perl 2.10-3 module for extracting the content contained
ii libhtml-tagset-perl 3.20-2 Data tables pertaining to HTML
ii libhtml-template-perl 2.9-1 HTML::Template : A module for using HTML Tem
ii libhtml-tree-perl 3.23-1 represent and create HTML syntax trees
ii libio-compress-base-perl 2.012-1 Base Class for IO::Compress modules
ii libio-compress-zlib-perl 2.012-1 Perl interface to zlib
ii libio-socket-ssl-perl 1.16-1+lenny1 Perl module implementing object oriented 
int
ii libio-string-perl 1.08-2 Emulate IO::File interface for in-core strin
ii libio-stringy-perl 2.110-4 Perl modules for IO from scalars and arrays
ii libipc-run3-perl 0.036-1 perl IPC::Run3 - Run a subprocess in batch m
ii liblocale-gettext-perl 1.05-4 Using libc functions for internationalizatio
ii libmail-box-perl 2.082-2 Manage a message-folder
ii libmail-sendmail-perl 0.79-5 Send email from a perl script
ii libmailtools-perl 2.03-1 Manipulate email in perl programs
ii libmime-tools-perl 5.427-1 Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant messages
ii libmime-types-perl 1.24-1 Perl extension for determining MIME types an
ii libnet-dbus-perl 0.33.6-1+b1 Extension for the DBus bindings
ii libnet-ssleay-perl 1.35-1 Perl module for Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)
ii libnews-nntpclient-perl 0.37-7 News::NNTPClient, Perl support for accessing
ii libnumber-compare-perl 0.01-5 Perform numeric comparisons in Perl
ii libobject-realize-later-perl 0.18-1 Delayed creation of objects
ii libossp-uuid-perl 1.5.1-1.1+b1 perl OSSP::UUID - OSSP uuid Perl Binding
ii libparams-validate-perl 0.91-2 validate 

Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-12 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 13/04/11 02:26, Christian Jakob wrote:
 Ok, first of all: Thank you for helping me!
 
 There's the clue.
 If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
 install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
 about
 
 Yes, I can not remember what I did wrong last time I used Debian.
 Maybe it is important to say, that I have 2 system running on my machine.
 1. Debian (stable, for backups and open-source-software testing)
 2. Windows (for gaming and reinstalling every year^^)
 I did not use Debian for a while (several weeks/months), but now I need it
 for my work.
 This is why I do not remember what I changed on the system last time I used 
 it...

Had you temporarily used other repositories around that time?
ls -l /etc/apt/ | grep sources.list~

 
 In your last post you gave me the hint with perl and I checked it...
 Maybe this is the source of the problem, because as I know apt uses perl 
 somehow...?!


 ... sorry for the long list :( ...
 
snipped
The versions you quoted all match the ones on my system.

When I've previously damaged apt:- perl, package dependencies, and a
failing hdd were the causes.

The dependencies for scons are python... could it be that you have some
non-standard python on your system??
Occasionally I've had install problems because I'd forgotten that I'd
temporarily make python2.4 the system default... but surely that would
not be your problem(?)

work:/home/scott# dpkg -l |grep python2.5
ii  python2.52.5.2-15+lenny1
  An interactive high-level object-oriented language (version 2.
ii  python2.5-minimal2.5.2-15+lenny1
  A minimal subset of the Python language (version 2.5)

scott@work:~$ python -V
Python 2.5.2

Have you manually installed scons?
Did it throw up any errors?

I strongly suspect the problems is software based - when I've had
hardware based problems with apt there have been plenty of error messages...

If you have the minimal python requirements then, short of suggestions
from others, I'd propose that the cause may be a hardware failure.

 
 
 fsck lately?
 
 Don't know, maybe.. How can I find out?

It's Theodore Ts’o's handler for file system checks - usually runs
automagically every x number of boots. It'll show in dmesg if there's
been a problem.

 
 Are you running SMART?
 
 What is smart? I don't think that it is running.

A hard drive monitoring system:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.

If your hard drive supports it, and it's enabled in your BIOS, then it
can be useful to determine if your hdd is failing.

NOTE: I don't propose that you need SMART to solve this problem, it's
just another place I look for useful error messages when I'm trying to
determine if a fault is hardware or software based.

snipped

 root@debian# apt-get -sf install

snipped

 Reading package lists ... Finish
 Building dependency tree
 Reading state information ... Finish
 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.


The above shows that a previous apt-get install hasn't been left broken.


 
 
 Regards,
 
 Christian
 
snipped

Cheers

-- 
Tuttle? His name's Buttle.
There must be some mistake.
Mistake? [Chuckles]
We don't make mistakes.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da4f04d.1060...@gmail.com



problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-11 Thread Christian Jakob
Hi @all,


Normally I can handle debian problems by my own, but this time I have a really 
unusual problem with apt-get.
I use german version of lenny on a 32 bit i386 architecture.
Internet connection works fine and public keys are up-to-date (see below).
I think the following lines will help you to understand my problem:
(Note that scons is NOT installed on the computer!)



root@debian# apt-cache search scons
scons - A replacement for Make

root@debian# apt-get install scons
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
Paket scons ist nicht verfügbar, wird aber von einem anderen
Paket referenziert. Das kann heißen, dass das Paket fehlt, dass es veraltet
ist oder nur aus einer anderen Quelle verfügbar ist.
E: Paket scons hat keinen Installationskandidaten



root@debian# apt-get update
OK http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg
#...
#...
OK http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Sources
OK http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/contrib Sources
Es wurden 1298kB in 2s geholt (479kB/s)
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig

root@debian# apt-get upgrade
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert.


root@debian# apt-key list
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg

pub 1024D/16BA136C 2005-08-21
uid Backports.org Archive Key ftp-mas...@backports.org
sub 2048g/5B82CECE 2005-08-21

pub 1024D/F42584E6 2008-04-06 [verfällt: 2012-05-15]
uid Lenny Stable Release Key debian-rele...@lists.debian.org

pub 2048R/6D849617 2009-01-24 [verfällt: 2013-01-23]
uid Debian-Volatile Archive Automatic Signing Key (5.0/lenny)

pub 1024D/4E7532C8 2011-01-11 [verfällt: 2012-01-11]
uid Opera Software Archive Automatic Signing Key 2011 packa...@opera.com
sub 4096g/BAC0E9D1 2011-01-11 [verfällt: 2012-01-11]

pub 4096R/473041FA 2010-08-27 [verfällt: 2018-03-05]
uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze) ftpmas...@debian.org

pub 4096R/55BE302B 2009-01-27 [verfällt: 2012-12-31]
uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (5.0/lenny) ftpmas...@debian.org

pub 4096R/B98321F9 2010-08-07 [verfällt: 2017-08-05]
uid Squeeze Stable Release Key debian-rele...@lists.debian.org

root@debian# gpg --list-keys
/root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg

pub 1024D/F42584E6 2008-04-06 [verfällt: 2012-05-15]
uid Lenny Stable Release Key debian-rele...@lists.debian.org

pub 1024D/4E7532C8 2011-01-11 [verfällt: 2012-01-11]
uid Opera Software Archive Automatic Signing Key 2011 packa...@opera.com
sub 4096g/BAC0E9D1 2011-01-11 [verfällt: 2012-01-11]

pub 4096R/473041FA 2010-08-27 [verfällt: 2018-03-05]
uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze) ftpmas...@debian.org

pub 4096R/55BE302B 2009-01-27 [verfällt: 2012-12-31]
uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (5.0/lenny) ftpmas...@debian.org




My sources.list looks like that:

deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib
deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib

deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib


I think it should be ok...

So were is the FING problem?

Please help me!


Thank you and good night,

Christian 

___
Schon gehört? WEB.DE hat einen genialen Phishing-Filter in die
Toolbar eingebaut! http://produkte.web.de/go/toolbar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1059876264.212170.1302547688187.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb036



Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-11 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 12/04/11 04:48, Christian Jakob wrote:
 Hi @all,
 
 
 Normally I can handle debian problems by my own, but this time I have a 
 really unusual problem with apt-get.
 I use german version of lenny on a 32 bit i386 architecture.
 Internet connection works fine and public keys are up-to-date (see below).
 I think the following lines will help you to understand my problem:
 (Note that scons is NOT installed on the computer!)
 
 
 
 root@debian# apt-cache search scons
 scons - A replacement for Make
 
 root@debian# apt-get install scons
Reading package lists ... Finish
Dependency Tree
Reading state information ... Finish
Scons package is not available, but from another
Package referenced. This may mean that the package is missing, that obsolete
or is only available from another source.
E: scons package has no installation candidate
 
 
 
 root@debian# apt-get update
 OK http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg
 #...
 #...
 OK http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Sources
 OK http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/contrib Sources
 Es wurden 1298kB in 2s geholt (479kB/s)
 Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
 
 root@debian# apt-get upgrade
 Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
 Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
 Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert.
 
 
 root@debian# apt-key list
 /etc/apt/trusted.gpg
 

If there was a key problem I'd expect to see an error message when you
ran update

 
 
 My sources.list looks like that:
 
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib

Using the above repository I was able to download scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb

snipped
 
 I think it should be ok...

It *is* OK - the problem must be elsewhere - unless the repository has
changed in the time between your test and mine.

 
 So were is the FING problem?
 
 Please help me!
 
 
 Thank you and good night,
 
 Christian 
 

The only things I can think of are:-
;temporary problem with the repository (it certainly works at the time
of writing this)
;your apt database is corrupted
;weird dependency problem/conflicts

Any non-Lenny perl on your system?

My perl packages for reference (kde de):-
libapt-pkg-perl install
libauthen-pam-perl  install
libclass-accessor-perl  install
libconvert-binhex-perl  install
libcrypt-ssleay-perlinstall
libdate-manip-perl  install
libdbd-mysql-perl   install
libdbi-perl install
libfile-basedir-perlinstall
libfile-desktopentry-perl   install
libfile-mimeinfo-perl   install
libfinance-quote-perl   install
libgraphics-magick-perl install
libhtml-parser-perl install
libhtml-tableextract-perl   install
libhtml-tagset-perl install
libhtml-tree-perl   install
libinline-perl  install
libio-pty-perl  install
libio-string-perl   install
libio-stringy-perl  install
liblocale-gettext-perl  install
libmailtools-perl   install
libmime-tools-perl  install
libnet-daemon-perl  install
libnet-ssleay-perl  install
libnews-nntpclient-perl install
libparse-debianchangelog-perl   install
libparse-recdescent-perlinstall
libperl5.10 install
libplrpc-perl   install
libqt-perl  install
libroman-perl   install
libsgmls-perl   install
libtext-charwidth-perl  install
libtext-format-perl install
libtext-iconv-perl  install
libtext-wrapi18n-perl   install
libtimedate-perlinstall
liburi-perl install
libwww-perl install
perlinstall
perl-base   install
perl-modulesinstall
perl-suid   install


You could try directly downloading the package and seeing if any errors
give more clues to the cause of the problem

http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/scons/scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb

Cheers

-- 
Tuttle? His name's Buttle.
There must be some mistake

Re: problem with apt-get install AND apt-get upgrade

2011-04-11 Thread Christian Jakob
Good morning,

The only things I can think of are:-
;temporary problem with the repository (it certainly works at the time
of writing this)
;your apt database is corrupted
;weird dependency problem/conflicts

Any non-Lenny perl on your system?


No, the problem occurs since a few weeks/months and not only with this 
package...
I can NOT install ANY package with apt-get, 
but I CAN install any package manually with dpkg -i packagename.deb.
I can NOT upgrade the system with apt-get upgrade.
I have no non-Lenny perl on my system.

If it helps: I can remove packages with apt-cache --purge remove packagename
I can search packages with apt-cache search packagename.

Please give me further hints/allusions to the source of the problem!


Cheers,

Christian


old-message

On 12/04/11 04:48, Christian Jakob wrote:
 Hi @all,
 
 
 Normally I can handle debian problems by my own, but this time I have a 
 really unusual problem with apt-get.
 I use german version of lenny on a 32 bit i386 architecture.
 Internet connection works fine and public keys are up-to-date (see below).
 I think the following lines will help you to understand my problem:
 (Note that scons is NOT installed on the computer!)
 
 
 
 root@debian# apt-cache search scons
 scons - A replacement for Make
 
 root@debian# apt-get install scons
Reading package lists ... Finish
Dependency Tree
Reading state information ... Finish
Scons package is not available, but from another
Package referenced. This may mean that the package is missing, that obsolete
or is only available from another source.
E: scons package has no installation candidate
 
 
 
 root@debian# apt-get update
 OK http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg
 #...
 #...
 OK http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Sources
 OK http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/contrib Sources
 Es wurden 1298kB in 2s geholt (479kB/s)
 Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
 
 root@debian# apt-get upgrade
 Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
 Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
 Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert.
 
 
 root@debian# apt-key list
 /etc/apt/trusted.gpg
 

If there was a key problem I'd expect to see an error message when you
ran update

 
 
 My sources.list looks like that:
 
 deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib

Using the above repository I was able to download scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb

snipped
 
 I think it should be ok...

It *is* OK - the problem must be elsewhere - unless the repository has
changed in the time between your test and mine.

 
 So were is the FING problem?
 
 Please help me!
 
 
 Thank you and good night,
 
 Christian 
 

The only things I can think of are:-
;temporary problem with the repository (it certainly works at the time
of writing this)
;your apt database is corrupted
;weird dependency problem/conflicts

Any non-Lenny perl on your system?

My perl packages for reference (kde de):-
libapt-pkg-perl install
libauthen-pam-perl install
libclass-accessor-perl install
libconvert-binhex-perl install
libcrypt-ssleay-perl install
libdate-manip-perl install
libdbd-mysql-perl install
libdbi-perl install
libfile-basedir-perl install
libfile-desktopentry-perl install
libfile-mimeinfo-perl install
libfinance-quote-perl install
libgraphics-magick-perl install
libhtml-parser-perl install
libhtml-tableextract-perl install
libhtml-tagset-perl install
libhtml-tree-perl install
libinline-perl install
libio-pty-perl install
libio-string-perl install
libio-stringy-perl install
liblocale-gettext-perl install
libmailtools-perl install
libmime-tools-perl install
libnet-daemon-perl install
libnet-ssleay-perl install
libnews-nntpclient-perl install
libparse-debianchangelog-perl install
libparse-recdescent-perl install
libperl5.10 install
libplrpc-perl install
libqt-perl install
libroman-perl install
libsgmls-perl install
libtext-charwidth-perl install
libtext-format-perl install
libtext-iconv-perl install
libtext-wrapi18n-perl install
libtimedate-perl install
liburi-perl install
libwww-perl install
perl install
perl-base install
perl-modules install
perl-suid install


You could try directly downloading the package and seeing if any errors
give more clues to the cause of the problem

http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/scons/scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb

Cheers

-- 
Tuttle? His name's Buttle.
There must be some mistake.
Mistake? [Chuckles]
We don't make mistakes.



___
WEB.DE DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 euro;/mtl.! Jetzt mit 
gratis Handy-Flat! http://produkte.web.de/go/DSL_Doppel_Flatrate/2


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/2078621304.1871434.1302586723931.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb040



Problem with apt-get

2010-07-13 Thread PRAKHAR gaur






Dear All,

I am using Debian 5.0.5, on a x86 machine. The Network is through a DHCP 
server. For connection to internet we have a Proxy server.
I was using Debian 5.0.4 on it apt-get used to work fine, but since this new 
installation of 5.0.5, there is some problem.

$  sudo apt-get install gromacs
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  gromacs-data lesstif2 libxp6
Suggested packages:
  tcsh c-shell
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gromacs gromacs-data lesstif2 libxp6
0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 7678kB of archives.
After this operation, 23.1MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y
Err http://http.us.debian.org lenny/main libxp6 1:1.0.0.xsf1-2
  Could not resolve '@ibab'
Err http://http.us.debian.org lenny/main lesstif2 1:0.95.0-2.1
  Could not resolve '@ibab'
Err http://http.us.debian.org lenny/main gromacs-data 3.3.3-2
  Could not resolve '@ibab'
Err http://http.us.debian.org lenny/main gromacs 3.3.3-2
  Could not resolve '@ibab'
Failed to fetch 
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libx/libxp/libxp6_1.0.0.xsf1-2_i386.deb
  Could not resolve '@ibab'
Failed to fetch 
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/lesstif2/lesstif2_0.95.0-2.1_i386.deb
  Could not resolve '@ibab'
Failed to fetch 
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gromacs/gromacs-data_3.3.3-2_all.deb
  Could not resolve '@ibab'
Failed to fetch 
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gromacs/gromacs_3.3.3-2_i386.deb  
Could not resolve '@ibab'
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with 
--fix-missing?

Tried apt-get with --fix-missing option but it didnt work.
Tried two days later, now on using apt-get this is coming...

prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ sudo apt-get install dfsbuild
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  cdebootstrap cramfsprogs libarchive1 libdebian-installer-extra4 
libdebian-installer4 mkisofs reprepro
Suggested packages:
  gnupg-agent inoticoming
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  cdebootstrap cramfsprogs dfsbuild libarchive1 libdebian-installer-extra4 
libdebian-installer4 mkisofs reprepro
0 upgraded, 8 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 1472kB of archives.
After this operation, 3850kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  libdebian-installer4 libdebian-installer-extra4 cdebootstrap cramfsprogs 
mkisofs libarchive1 reprepro dfsbuild
Install these packages without verification [y/N]? y
0% [Connecting to http.us.debian.org (204.152.191.39)]

apt-get basically hangs here and does not proceeds further, the internet 
connection is working fine for Synaptic.
Did not find anything in the mail archives.

Thanking you,
Prakhar Gaur
  

Re: Problem with apt-get

2010-07-13 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2010-07-13, PRAKHAR gaur prakhar_aaid...@hotmail.com wrote:
 --_5b50f58c-d645-427a-a81a-d158616ad201_
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable







 Dear All=2C

 I am using Debian 5.0.5=2C on a x86 machine. The Network is through a DHCP =
 server. For connection to internet we have a Proxy server.
 I was using Debian 5.0.4 on it apt-get used to work fine=2C but since this =
 new installation of 5.0.5=2C there is some problem.

SNIP

http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=apt-get+proxy

Sorry, I couldn't resist :-)

-- 
Liam O'Toole
Cork, Ireland



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrni3o9ud.4mu.liam.p.oto...@dipsy.selfip.org



Re: Problem with apt-get --SOLVED

2010-07-13 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2010-07-13, PRAKHAR gaur prakhar_aaid...@hotmail.com wrote:
 --_7a55ae90-0232-4da2-b05b-00081b0cad13_
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


 Dear Liam=2C=20

 apt-get used to work before so I was not able to figure out there might be =
 a problem with the proxy.

Probably one of your configuration files was replaced during the
upgrade. The original will have been preserved with the extension
.dpkg-old.

 Thanks for pointing me out in the right direction.
 Solution:
 I just added this line to my /etc/bash.bashrc

 export http_proxy=3Dhttp://username:passw...@proxyserver.net:port/;

You might also add:

export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy

You never know when you might need it.


 Thanking you=2C
 Prakhar Gaur

You're welcome.

-- 
Liam O'Toole
Cork, Ireland



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrni3okfp.4mu.liam.p.oto...@dipsy.selfip.org



Re: Problem with apt-get --

2010-07-13 Thread PRAKHAR gaur

Dear Liam,

Probably one of your configuration files was replaced during the upgrade. The 
original will have been preserved with the extension
.dpkg-old.
I installed the OS again, did not upgrade it.
 
You might also add: 
export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
 
Ok. 

But now there is a slight problem, when ever I use sudo apt-get update,
 it does not work. but if I become root first, using su, and then so the same 
thing, it works.
I tried closing all the terminals and opening them again, didn't work.
Here is the output, first in normal user and then as root.

prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ sudo apt-get update
Err http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile Release.gpg   
   
  Cannot initiate the connection to volatile.debian.org:80 (2001:858:2:2::2). - 
connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:858:2:2::2 80]
Err http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/main Translation-en_IN
  
  Cannot initiate the connection to volatile.debian.org:80 (2001:858:2:2::2). - 
connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:858:2:2::2 80]
Err http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/contrib Translation-en_IN 
  
  Cannot initiate the connection to volatile.debian.org:80 (2001:858:2:2::2). - 
connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:858:2:2::2 80]
Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile Release   
  
Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/main Packages/DiffIndex   
   
Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/contrib Packages/DiffIndex
   
Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/main Sources/DiffIndex
   
Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/contrib Sources/DiffIndex 
   
Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/main Packages 

Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/contrib Packages  

Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/main Sources  

Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/contrib Sources   

Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/main Packages 

Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/contrib Packages  

Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/main Sources  

Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/contrib Sources   

Err http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/main Packages 

  Cannot initiate the connection to volatile.debian.org:80 (2001:858:2:2::2). - 
connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:858:2:2::2 80]
Err http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/contrib Packages  

  Cannot initiate the connection to volatile.debian.org:80 (2001:858:2:2::2). - 
connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:858:2:2::2 80]
Err http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/main Sources  

  Cannot initiate the connection to volatile.debian.org:80 (2001:858:2:2::2). - 
connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:858:2:2::2 80]
Err http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/contrib Sources   

  Cannot initiate the connection to volatile.debian.org:80 (2001:858:2:2::2). - 
connect (101 Network is unreachable) [IP: 2001:858:2:2::2 80]
23% [Connecting to http.us.debian.org (35.9.37.225)] [Connecting to 
security.debian.org (195.20.242.89)]^C

prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ su
Password: 
ibab-stud021:/home/prakhar# apt-get update
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org lenny Release.gpg [1033B]   
Get:2 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg [835B]   

Get:3 http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile Release.gpg [481B]  

Ign http://http.us.debian.org lenny/main Translation-en_IN  

Ign http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Translation-en_IN  

Ign http://http.us.debian.org lenny/contrib Translation-en_IN   

Ign http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/non-free Translation-en_IN 

Ign http://volatile.debian.org lenny/volatile/main Translation-en_IN

Ign http://http.us.debian.org lenny/non-free Translation-en_IN  

Ign 

Re: Problem with apt-get --

2010-07-13 Thread Sjoerd Hardeman

PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
You might also add: 
export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
 
Ok. 


But now there is a slight problem, when ever I use sudo apt-get update,
 it does not work. but if I become root first, using su, and then so the same 
thing, it works.
I tried closing all the terminals and opening them again, didn't work.
Can you do a echo $http_proxy both as root and as user? I guess 
$http_proxy isn't set properly for your user (and sudo uses user-values 
for its config)


Sjoerd



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Problem with apt-get --

2010-07-13 Thread PRAKHAR gaur

--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41 
+0200
From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
To: 
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --

PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
You might also add: 
export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
 
 Ok. 
 
 But now there is a slight problem, when ever I use sudo apt-get update,
  it does not work. but if I become root first, using su, and then so the 
 same thing, it works.
 I tried closing all the terminals and opening them again, didn't work.

Can you do a echo $http_proxy both as root and as user? I guess 
$http_proxy isn't set properly for your user (and sudo uses user-values 
for its config)
 
Sjoerd

prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ echo $http_proxy
http://proxy.ibab.ac.in:3128/
prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ su -
Password: 
ibab-stud021:~# echo $http_proxy

ibab-stud021:~# exit
logout
prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ su
Password: 
ibab-stud021:/home/prakhar# echo $http_proxy
http://proxy.ibab.ac.in:3128/

Notice the difference of output between su - and su. I had read that su - 
loads that root user environment,
 and just su works with the current user environment only.
Additionally to answer your query, in both user and root the $http_proxy 
variable is set correctly.
I have done the same modifications to the user ~/.bashrc file, ie. added the 
line 
 export http_proxy=http://proxy.ibab.ac.in:3128/;
 
Well that's what all I did, please help me out.
  

RE: Problem with apt-get --

2010-07-13 Thread PRAKHAR gaur

From: prakhar_aaid...@hotmail.com
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:42:21 +0530








--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41 
+0200
From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
To: 
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --

PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
You might also add: 
export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
 
 Ok. 
 
 But now there is a slight problem, when ever I use sudo apt-get update,
  it does not work. but if I become root first, using su, and then so the 
 same thing, it works.
 I tried closing all the terminals and opening them again, didn't work.

Can you do a echo $http_proxy both as root and as user? I guess 
$http_proxy isn't set properly for your user (and sudo uses user-values 
for its config)
 
Sjoerd

prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ echo $http_proxy
http://proxy.ibab.ac.in:3128/
prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ su -
Password: 
ibab-stud021:~# echo $http_proxy

ibab-stud021:~# exit
logout
prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ su
Password: 
ibab-stud021:/home/prakhar# echo $http_proxy
http://proxy.ibab.ac.in:3128/

Notice the difference of output between su - and su. I had read that su - 
loads that root user environment,
 and just su works with the current user environment only.
Additionally to answer your query, in both user and root the $http_proxy 
variable is set correctly.
I have done the same modifications to the user ~/.bashrc file, ie. added the 
line 
 export http_proxy=http://proxy.ibab.ac.in:3128/;
 
Well that's what all I did, please help me out.
_ _ _  __ _  _  
  _   _
Dear All,

Have a interesting update and potentially the solution of the problem. I have 
another system running Debian 5.0.5
,same hard ware configuration.
It had the same problem, while reading about apt on Wikipedia, got to know 
about the command apt-config dump
and the file /etc/apt/apt.conf
I ran the command on the other system, and the proxy was entered incorrectly(I 
did not do that)
I checked out the file apt.conf on my other system, it had only one line,
Acquire::http::Proxy http://i...@ibab:3128;;
Hence I corrected it to, 
Acquire::http::Proxy http://ibab.ac.in:@proxy.ibab.ac.in:3128;;
and now every thing is fine.
But funnily enough, when tryiny to correct the same file on my own system,
There was no /etc/apt/apt.conf file.
Hence created that file and just put the above line in it.
apt-get is working fine now.

Wonder why there was no /etc/apt/apt.conf file present???

Thanks to everyone for the help,
Prakhar Gaur 
  

Re: Problem with apt-get --

2010-07-13 Thread Sjoerd Hardeman
Op 13-07-10 19:12, PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
 --Forwarded Message Attachment--
 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41 +0200
 From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
 
 PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
You might also add: 
export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
 
 Ok. 
 
 But now there is a slight problem, when ever I use sudo apt-get update,
  it does not work. but if I become root first, using su, and then so the 
 same thing, it works.
 I tried closing all the terminals and opening them again, didn't work.
 
Can you do a echo $http_proxy both as root and as user? I guess 
$http_proxy isn't set properly for your user (and sudo uses user-values 
for its config)
  
Sjoerd
 
 prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ echo $http_proxy
 http://proxy.ibab.ac.in:3128/
 prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ su -
 Password: 
 ibab-stud021:~# echo $http_proxy
 
 ibab-stud021:~# exit
 logout
 prak...@ibab-stud021:~$ su
 Password: 
 ibab-stud021:/home/prakhar# echo $http_proxy
 http://proxy.ibab.ac.in:3128/
 
 Notice the difference of output between su - and su. I had read that su 
 - loads that root user environment,
  and just su works with the current user environment only.
 Additionally to answer your query, in both user and root the $http_proxy 
 variable is set correctly.
 I have done the same modifications to the user ~/.bashrc file, ie. added the 
 line 
  export http_proxy=http://proxy.ibab.ac.in:3128/;
Try adding it in /etc/bash.bashrc. That should work for all users.

Good luck!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Problem running apt-get update

2009-04-22 Thread Stephen Liu

Hi folks,


Debian Lenny


$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny main
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny main

deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib

deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny non-free
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny contrib
[/code]# apt-file update
* end *


# apt-file update
Can't get
http://security.debian.org/dists/lenny/updates/Contents-i386.gz

Please advise how to fix the problem. TIA


B.R.
sato,os

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Problem running apt-get update

2009-04-22 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-04-22 17:28 +0200, Stephen Liu wrote:

 $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny main
 deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny main

 deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib
 deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib

 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny non-free
 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny contrib
 [/code]# apt-file update
 * end *


 # apt-file update
 Can't get
 http://security.debian.org/dists/lenny/updates/Contents-i386.gz

That's because there is no such file.

 Please advise how to fix the problem. TIA

You may want to help to fix bug #483453¹, otherwise you can just ignore
the apt-file error message.

Sven


¹ http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483453


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Display problem after apt-get dist-upgrade

2009-04-13 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-04-13 07:48 +0200, Kuang Chen wrote:

 I apt-get and apt-get dist-upgraded everyday and I think
 several xorg-related and intel graphics card got upgraded a
 few days ago. Then the display of my computer got messed
 up. The windows repait themselves slowly when they are moved
 around: one can even see the obvious delay in repainting. So I am
 sure something went wrong with the graphics card configuration or
 things of that kind. I've attached my xorg.conf and
 /var/log/xorg.0.log below. If anything beyond those is needed, I
 can attach them then, as long as you can tell me what I should do,
 since I am inexperienced in Linux. Thanks very much.

If you are inexperienced in Linux, you had better not run Debian
unstable.  Do yourself a favor and stick to stable or testing instead.

The latest Intel video driver seems to have some serious problems, you
may want to check the bug list at [1], especially the newly filed
important bugs.

Sven


1. http://bugs.debian.org/xserver-xorg-video-intel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Display problem after apt-get dist-upgrade

2009-04-13 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 22:48:01 -0700, Kuang Chen wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I apt-get and apt-get dist-upgraded everyday and I think
 several xorg-related and intel graphics card got upgraded a
 few days ago. Then the display of my computer got messed
 up. The windows repait themselves slowly when they are moved
 around: one can even see the obvious delay in repainting.

[...]

 X.Org X Server 1.6.0
 Release Date: 2009-2-25
 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 x86_64 Debian
 Current Operating System: Linux DebianLab 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Mar 27 
 04:02:59 UTC 2009 x86_64
 Build Date: 08 April 2009  11:41:45PM

[...]

 (--) PCI:*(0...@0:2:0) Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated 
 Graphics Controller rev 12, Mem @ 0xf810/1048576, 0xe000/268435456, 
 I/O @ 0x1800/8
 (--) PCI: (0...@0:2:1) Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated 
 Graphics Controller rev 12, Mem @ 0xf820/1048576

[...]

 (II) LoadModule: dri
 (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libdri.so
 (II) Module dri: vendor=X.Org Foundation
   compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 1.0.0
   ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 2.0
 (II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI
 (II) LoadModule: dri2
 (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libdri2.so
 (II) Module dri2: vendor=X.Org Foundation
   compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 1.0.0
   ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 2.0
 (II) Loading extension DRI2
 (II) LoadModule: intel
 (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//intel_drv.so
 (II) Module intel: vendor=X.Org Foundation
   compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 2.6.3
   Module class: X.Org Video Driver
   ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 5.0

[...]

 (WW) intel(0): libpciaccess reported 0 rom size, guessing 64kB

I see this warning, too. I have not noticed any problems resulting from it.

 (==) intel(0): Using EXA for acceleration

[...]

 (II) Loading sub module exa
 (II) LoadModule: exa
 (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libexa.so
 (II) Module exa: vendor=X.Org Foundation
   compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 2.4.0
   ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 5.0

[...]

 (WW) intel(0): DRI2 requires UXA

[...]

 (II) EXA(0): Offscreen pixmap area of 12582912 bytes
 (II) EXA(0): Driver registered support for the following operations:
 (II) Solid
 (II) Copy
 (II) Composite (RENDER acceleration)

[...]

 (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable

That might be a reason for the rendering latency, if your window manager
relies on AIGLX.

[...]

 Section Device
 Identifier IntelCard
 Driver intel
 VendorName Intel Corporation
 BoardName Mobile Integrated Graphics Controller
 BusID PCI:0:2:0
 EndSection

I would try to add

Option  AccelMethod   UXA

to this section and restart X. I also have a chipset from the 965 series
(965Q) and in my case switching to UXA (which enables DRI2) improved
both the stability and the rendering speed.

-- 
Regards,| http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer
  Florian   |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Display problem after apt-get dist-upgrade

2009-04-12 Thread Kuang Chen
Hi,

I apt-get and apt-get dist-upgraded everyday and I think
several xorg-related and intel graphics card got upgraded a
few days ago. Then the display of my computer got messed
up. The windows repait themselves slowly when they are moved
around: one can even see the obvious delay in repainting. So I am
sure something went wrong with the graphics card configuration or
things of that kind. I've attached my xorg.conf and
/var/log/xorg.0.log below. If anything beyond those is needed, I
can attach them then, as long as you can tell me what I should do,
since I am inexperienced in Linux. Thanks very much.


Kuang 



X.Org X Server 1.6.0
Release Date: 2009-2-25
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 x86_64 Debian
Current Operating System: Linux DebianLab 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Mar 27 
04:02:59 UTC 2009 x86_64
Build Date: 08 April 2009  11:41:45PM
xorg-server 2:1.6.0-1 (jcris...@debian.org) 
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Sun Apr 12 21:53:47 2009
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf
(==) No Layout section.  Using the first Screen section.
(**) |--Screen Default Screen (0)
(**) |   |--Monitor Configured Monitor
(==) No device specified for screen Default Screen.
Using the first device section listed.
(**) |   |--Device IntelCard
(==) Automatically adding devices
(==) Automatically enabling devices
(WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/ does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/ does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(==) FontPath set to:
/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc,
/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1,
/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType,
built-ins
(==) ModulePath set to /usr/lib/xorg/modules
(II) Cannot locate a core pointer device.
(II) Cannot locate a core keyboard device.
(II) The server relies on HAL to provide the list of input devices.
If no devices become available, reconfigure HAL or disable 
AllowEmptyInput.
(II) Loader magic: 0xd40
(II) Module ABI versions:
X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4
X.Org Video Driver: 5.0
X.Org XInput driver : 4.0
X.Org Server Extension : 2.0
(II) Loader running on linux
(++) using VT number 7

(--) PCI:*(0...@0:2:0) Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics 
Controller rev 12, Mem @ 0xf810/1048576, 0xe000/268435456, I/O @ 
0x1800/8
(--) PCI: (0...@0:2:1) Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics 
Controller rev 12, Mem @ 0xf820/1048576
(II) Open ACPI successful (/var/run/acpid.socket)
(II) System resource ranges:
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x1) MX[B]
[1] -1  0   0x000f - 0x000f (0x1) MX[B]
[2] -1  0   0x000c - 0x000e (0x3) MX[B]
[3] -1  0   0x - 0x0009 (0xa) MX[B]
[4] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B]
[5] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B]
(II) LoadModule: extmod
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libextmod.so
(II) Module extmod: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: X.Org Server Extension
ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 2.0
(II) Loading extension SELinux
(II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
(II) Loading extension XFree86-VidModeExtension
(II) Loading extension XFree86-DGA
(II) Loading extension DPMS
(II) Loading extension XVideo
(II) Loading extension XVideo-MotionCompensation
(II) Loading extension X-Resource
(II) LoadModule: dbe
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libdbe.so
(II) Module dbe: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: X.Org Server Extension
ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 2.0
(II) Loading extension DOUBLE-BUFFER
(II) LoadModule: glx
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libglx.so
(II) Module glx: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 2.0
(==) AIGLX enabled
(II) Loading extension GLX
(II) LoadModule: record
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//librecord.so
(II) Module record: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 1.6.0, module 

Re: Problem med apt-get (dpkg).

2008-02-27 Thread Stefan Alfredsson
Markus Viitamäki wrote:
 Removing sun-java5-bin ...
 /usr/share/icons/sun-java5.png is not a directory
 dpkg: error processing sun-java5-bin (--remove):

Se http://bugs.debian.org/462727

Det är /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java5-bin.postrm som är buggig.
Om du tar bort sun-java5.png på rad 36 i postrm-scriptet
(så det står update-icon-caches /usr/share/icons/) så
bör borttagningen fungera bättre.

Mvh,
 Stefan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem med apt-get (dpkg).

2008-02-24 Thread Markus Viitamäki
Tjosan alla. Jag har ett litet problem med apt-get (dpkg). Jag har 
nämligen ett paket som vägrar att försvinna. Och jag lyckas inte ta bort 
de med apt-get remove paket.


Såhär ser de ut:

lappy /home/markus # apt-get remove sun-java5-bin
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree  
Reading state information... Done

The following packages will be REMOVED:
 sun-java5-bin
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 226 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 66.9MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y
(Reading database ... 113130 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing sun-java5-bin ...
/usr/share/icons/sun-java5.png is not a directory
dpkg: error processing sun-java5-bin (--remove):
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
sun-java5-bin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


Och här slutar de, jag har försökt allt jag kan komma på, så nu frågar 
jag er.


Med vänliga hälsningar.
Markus 'suom1' Viitamäki


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem med apt-get (dpkg).

2008-02-24 Thread Torbjörn Svensson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hejsan!

Markus Viitamäki wrote:
 Tjosan alla. Jag har ett litet problem med apt-get (dpkg). Jag har
 nämligen ett paket som vägrar att försvinna. Och jag lyckas inte ta bort
 de med apt-get remove paket.
 
 Såhär ser de ut:
 
 /usr/share/icons/sun-java5.png is not a directory

Om det bara är denna bilden som den klagar på, kanske det går att
manuellt ta bort den och skapa en mapp på det stället? Dvs, lura
scriptet till att tro att den gör rätt ;-)

Ett alternativ till apt-get för borttagning av ett paket är 'dpkg -P'.

Hälsningar,
- --
  .''`. Torbjörn Svensson, azoff (at) se (dot) linux (dot) org
 : :' : 7EB9 2DC5 61AE DAB5 7099  BAC6 798E E39A DBDB 0CFD
 `. `'  http://www.azoff.se | http://dev.azoff.se
   `--  http://se.linux.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHwmpaeY7jmtvbDP0RAvAHAKCcu0ZdvtHuRTZeEzrphM3xMJXQzQCdFqa+
0leRbW/Seq8i7JmMPwBwFGQ=
=CxR3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem with apt-get update command: failed to fetch packages 404 not found

2007-09-25 Thread Steve Lam
I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and it
bugs me for weeks.  I've tried to update Debian with
the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to fetch
packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file but
It doesn't help me at all.  I've tried apt-setup and
it failed as well with the same message such as
'Failed to fetch'.  Any help is appreciated.


Here is the error produced by apt-get update:
 
sistership:/etc/apt# apt-get update
Err http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main
Packages 404 Not Found
Err http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Packages 404 Not
Found
Ign http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main
Release
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Release
Err http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/contrib
Packages 404 Not Found
Err http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/contrib Packages 404
Not Found
Ign http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/contrib
Release
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/contrib Release
Err http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/non-free
Packages 404 Not Found
Err http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/non-free Packages 404
Not Found
Ign http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/non-free
Release
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/non-free Release
Err http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Sources 404 Not
Found
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Release
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/sarge/contrib/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/sarge/non-free/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/sarge/main/source/Sources.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/sarge/updates/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/sarge/updates/contrib/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/sarge/updates/non-free/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Reading Package Lists... Done
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_sarge_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/contrib Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_sarge_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/non-free Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_sarge_non-free_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_sarge_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/contrib
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_sarge_updates_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/non-free
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_sarge_updates_non-free_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these
problems
E: Some index files failed to download, they have been
ignored, or old ones used instead.

My Debian sources.list file is:
#deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main contrib
non-free
deb-src http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main
contrib non-free
#deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main
contrib
#deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main
contrib non-free


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with apt-get update command: failed to fetch packages 404 not found

2007-09-25 Thread Jeff D

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Steve Lam wrote:


I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and it
bugs me for weeks.  I've tried to update Debian with
the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to fetch
packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file but
It doesn't help me at all.  I've tried apt-setup and
it failed as well with the same message such as
'Failed to fetch'.  Any help is appreciated.



snip apt output


My Debian sources.list file is:
#deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main contrib
non-free
deb-src http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main
contrib non-free
#deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main
contrib
#deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main
contrib non-free



try replacing sarge with oldstable, that should fix that up for ya.

hth
Jeff

-+-
8 out of 10 Owners who Expressed a Preference said Their Cats Preferred Techno.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Problem with apt-get update command: failed to fetch packages 404 not found

2007-09-25 Thread Steve Lam
I've replace 'sarge' with 'oldstable' once. Now I try
again and apt-get update gives the same result: Failed
to fetch packages 404 not found.  Here is the output
from apt-get update:
Err http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Packages 404
Not Found
Err http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/main
Packages 404 Not Found
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Release
Ign http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/main
Release
Err http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/contrib Packages
404 Not Found
Err http://security.debian.org
oldstable/updates/contrib Packages 404 Not Found
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/contrib Release
Ign http://security.debian.org
oldstable/updates/contrib Release
Err http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/non-free Packages
  404 Not Found
Err http://security.debian.org
oldstable/updates/non-free Packages 404 Not Found
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/non-free Release
Ign http://security.debian.org
oldstable/updates/non-free Release
Err http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Sources
  404 Not Found
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Release
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/oldstable/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/oldstable/contrib/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/oldstable/non-free/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/oldstable/main/source/Sources.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/oldstable/updates/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/oldstable/updates/contrib/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/oldstable/updates/non-free/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Reading Package Lists... Done
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_oldstable_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/contrib Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_oldstable_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/non-free Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_oldstable_non-free_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/main
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_oldstable_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/contrib
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_oldstable_updates_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/non-free
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_oldstable_updates_non-free_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these
problems
E: Some index files failed to download, they have been
ignored, or old ones used instead.

My modified sources.list is:

#deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main contrib
non-free
#deb-src http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ oldstable  main
contrib non-free
deb-src http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ oldstable main


#deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main
contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ oldstable/updates main
contrib non-free

#deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main
contrib
#deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main
contrib non-free


--- Jeff D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 try replacing sarge with oldstable, that should fix
 that up for ya.
 
 hth
 Jeff
 
 -+-
 8 out of 10 Owners who Expressed a Preference said
 Their Cats Preferred Techno.
 
 
 -- 

 On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Steve Lam wrote:
 
  I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and
 it
  bugs me for weeks.  I've tried to update Debian
 with
  the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to
 fetch
  packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file
 but
  It doesn't help me at all.  I've tried apt-setup
 and
  it failed as well with the same message such as
  'Failed to fetch'.  Any help is appreciated.
 
 
 snip apt output
 
  My Debian sources.list file is:
  #deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main
  deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main
 contrib
  non-free
  deb-src http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main
  deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main
  contrib non-free
  #deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main
  contrib
  #deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates
 main
  contrib non-free
 

 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
 [EMAIL

Problem with apt-get update command: failed to fetch packages 404 not found

2007-09-25 Thread Steve Lam
I've replaced 'sarge' with 'oldstable' once. Now I try
again with 'apt-get update' and it gives the same
problem: Failed to fetch packages 404 not found.  Any
help is appreciated.  Here is the output from apt-get
update:

Err http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Packages 404
Not Found
Err http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/main
Packages 404 Not Found
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Release
Ign http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/main
Release
Err http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/contrib Packages
404 Not Found
Err http://security.debian.org
oldstable/updates/contrib Packages 404 Not Found
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/contrib Release
Ign http://security.debian.org
oldstable/updates/contrib Release
Err http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/non-free Packages
  404 Not Found
Err http://security.debian.org
oldstable/updates/non-free Packages 404 Not Found
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/non-free Release
Ign http://security.debian.org
oldstable/updates/non-free Release
Err http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Sources
  404 Not Found
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Release
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/oldstable/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/oldstable/contrib/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/oldstable/non-free/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/oldstable/main/source/Sources.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/oldstable/updates/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/oldstable/updates/contrib/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/oldstable/updates/non-free/binary-i386/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found
Reading Package Lists... Done
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_oldstable_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/contrib Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_oldstable_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/non-free Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_oldstable_non-free_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/main
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_oldstable_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/contrib
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_oldstable_updates_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list
http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/non-free
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_oldstable_updates_non-free_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these
problems
E: Some index files failed to download, they have been
ignored, or old ones used instead.

My modified sources.list is:

#deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main contrib
non-free
#deb-src http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main
deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ oldstable  main
contrib non-free
deb-src http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ oldstable main


#deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main
contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ oldstable/updates main
contrib non-free

#deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main
contrib
#deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main
contrib non-free

--- Jeff D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Steve Lam wrote:
 
  I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and
 it
  bugs me for weeks.  I've tried to update Debian
 with
  the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to
 fetch
  packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file
 but
  It doesn't help me at all.  I've tried apt-setup
 and
  it failed as well with the same message such as
  'Failed to fetch'.  Any help is appreciated.
 
 
 snip apt output
 
  My Debian sources.list file is:
  #deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main
  deb http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main
 contrib
  non-free
  deb-src http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/ sarge main
  deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main
  contrib non-free
  #deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main
  contrib
  #deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates
 main
  contrib non-free
 
 
 try replacing sarge with oldstable, that should fix
 that up for ya.
 
 hth
 Jeff
 
 -+-
 8 out of 10 Owners who Expressed a Preference said
 Their Cats Preferred Techno

Re: Problem with apt-get update command: failed to fetch packages 404 not found

2007-09-25 Thread Mumia W..

On 09/25/2007 12:49 PM, Steve Lam wrote:

I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and it
bugs me for weeks.  I've tried to update Debian with
the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to fetch
packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file but
It doesn't help me at all.  I've tried apt-setup and
it failed as well with the same message such as
'Failed to fetch'.  Any help is appreciated.


Here is the error produced by apt-get update:
 
sistership:/etc/apt# apt-get update

Err http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main
Packages 404 Not Found
Err http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Packages 404 Not
Found
Ign http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main
Release
Ign http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Release
Err http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/contrib
Packages 404 Not Found
Err http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/contrib Packages 404
[...]



Your sources.list, as posted, isn't formatted well.

How do you connect to the Internet? Dialup, DSL, cable?

Do you have a proxy or router in between you and the Internet?

Tell us what this command does?

wget http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/sarge/Release

Read this too:

http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Problem with apt-get update command: failed to fetch packages 404 not found

2007-09-25 Thread Steve Lam
The computer has connected to the router but it has a
static IP address.  The apt-get command has worked
fine before.

When I run 'apt-get update', it doesn't complain about
sources.list format problem.


--- Mumia W..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Your sources.list, as posted, isn't formatted well.
 
 How do you connect to the Internet? Dialup, DSL,
 cable?
 
 Do you have a proxy or router in between you and the
 Internet?
 
 Tell us what this command does?
 
 wget
 http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/dists/sarge/Release
 
 Read this too:
 
 http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
 

 On 09/25/2007 12:49 PM, Steve Lam wrote:
  I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and
 it
  bugs me for weeks.  I've tried to update Debian
 with
  the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to
 fetch
  packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file
 but
  It doesn't help me at all.  I've tried apt-setup
 and
  it failed as well with the same message such as
  'Failed to fetch'.  Any help is appreciated.
  
  
  Here is the error produced by apt-get update:
   
  sistership:/etc/apt# apt-get update
  Err http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main
  Packages 404 Not Found
  Err http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Packages 404
 Not
  Found
  Ign http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main
  Release
  Ign http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/main Release
  Err http://security.debian.org
 sarge/updates/contrib
  Packages 404 Not Found
  Err http://debian.yorku.ca sarge/contrib Packages
 404
  [...]
 

 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem mit apt-get localeconf

2006-11-16 Thread Peter Kuechler
Hallo!

Auf einem meiner Rechner lässt sich localeconf nicht richtig istallieren
(tagesaktuelle SID). Ich würde den Fehler ja gerne suchen, aber ich
brauche mehr infos. So sieht das Ergebnis aus:

---
linux3:/export/imex# apt-get install localeconf
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
localeconf is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 311 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Setting up localeconf (0.9.4.1) ...
dpkg: error processing localeconf (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10
Errors were encountered while processing:
 localeconf
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
---

Ich sehe, das es am post-installation script hängt. Nur wo dort?
Wie komme ich an genauere Debugging Infos???

Ich habe das Paket schon ausgepackt und mir das Script angesehen, aber
daran sehe ich ja nicht wo und warum es aussteigt.

Wie gehe ich da am besten vor?


-- 
mfg Peter Küchler
Systemadministrator
Planungsverband Ballungsraum
Frankfurt/Rhein-Main
Tel.: 069-2577-1301
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.pvfrm.de



Re: Problem mit apt-get localeconf

2006-11-16 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 16.11.06 10:36:45, Peter Kuechler wrote:
 Ich sehe, das es am post-installation script hängt. Nur wo dort?
 Wie komme ich an genauere Debugging Infos???

Das ausgefuehrte Skript liegt in /var/lib/dpkg/info (hat den Namen
paket.postinst) und wenn du da an den Anfang ein set -x schreibst
siehst du wo er aussteigt.

Andreas

-- 
You'll never be the man your mother was!


-- 
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): 
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/

Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)



Re: Problem mit apt-get localeconf

2006-11-16 Thread Peter Kuechler
Am Donnerstag, den 16.11.2006, 12:16 +0100 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:

 On 16.11.06 10:36:45, Peter Kuechler wrote:
  Ich sehe, das es am post-installation script hängt. Nur wo dort?
  Wie komme ich an genauere Debugging Infos???
 
 Das ausgefuehrte Skript liegt in /var/lib/dpkg/info (hat den Namen
 paket.postinst) und wenn du da an den Anfang ein set -x schreibst
 siehst du wo er aussteigt.

Hi Andreas,

erst mal sorry für die PM, sollte eigentlich in die Liste gehen
wie sich das gehört:-(

Die Antwort jetzt also hier:

 On 16.11.06 12:28:01, Peter Kuechler wrote:
  Am Donnerstag, den 16.11.2006, 12:16 +0100 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
   On 16.11.06 10:36:45, Peter Kuechler wrote:
Ich sehe, das es am post-installation script hängt. Nur wo dort?
Wie komme ich an genauere Debugging Infos???
   
   Das ausgefuehrte Skript liegt in /var/lib/dpkg/info (hat den Namen
   paket.postinst) und wenn du da an den Anfang ein set -x schreibst
   siehst du wo er aussteigt.
  
  Danke für den Tip!
  Ich habe daran auch schon gedacht.
  Allerdings bringt es nichts, wenn man dann das Script per Hand startet.
 
 Richtig, du hast nicht die passenden Optionen.
 
  Kann es sein, das man dazu dann erst wieder das Paket packen muß und
  installieren um es zu testen?
 
 Nein, du musst nicht das im Paket enthaltene Skript aendern sondern das
 was schon ausgepackt in /var/lib/dpkg/info liegt. Danach einfach wieder
 apt-get install localeconf aufrufen und schauen was er so ausgibt.

Ich bin ein Dussel, ich habe deine Mail nicht richtig gelesen.
Ich habe da nachgesehen und auch alles gefunden, danke.

Inzwischen ist der Fehler allerdings weg, ich habe das ganze Geraffel
mit locales deinstalliert und wieder installiert, plötzlich geht es.

Leider hab ich jetzt ein anderes Problem:

Ein dpkg-reconfigure localeconf funktioniert zwar, es kommen also alle
Menus und Abfragen, aber es wird nichts geändert, die
Datei /etc/environment bleibt unverändert, eine Fehlermeldung kommt auch
nicht.

Mal sehen, ob ich das mit dem von dir genannten System finden kann.

Danke erstmal,


-- 
mfg Peter Küchler
Systemadministrator
Planungsverband Ballungsraum
Frankfurt/Rhein-Main
Tel.: 069-2577-1301
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.pvfrm.de



Re: Problem mit apt-get localeconf

2006-11-16 Thread Peter Kuechler
Am Donnerstag, den 16.11.2006, 12:43 +0100 schrieb Peter Kuechler:

[...]
 Inzwischen ist der Fehler allerdings weg, ich habe das ganze Geraffel
 mit locales deinstalliert und wieder installiert, plötzlich geht es.
 
 Leider hab ich jetzt ein anderes Problem:
 
 Ein dpkg-reconfigure localeconf funktioniert zwar, es kommen also alle
 Menus und Abfragen, aber es wird nichts geändert, die
 Datei /etc/environment bleibt unverändert, eine Fehlermeldung kommt auch
 nicht.
 
 Mal sehen, ob ich das mit dem von dir genannten System finden kann.

Ist natürlich auch Blödsinn, da stehen ja nur die Installationsscripts.
Ich glaube ich brauch Urlaub:-(


-- 
mfg Peter Küchler
Systemadministrator
Planungsverband Ballungsraum
Frankfurt/Rhein-Main
Tel.: 069-2577-1301
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.pvfrm.de



Re: Problem mit apt-get localeconf

2006-11-16 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 16.11.06 12:43:05, Peter Kuechler wrote:
 Leider hab ich jetzt ein anderes Problem:
 
 Ein dpkg-reconfigure localeconf funktioniert zwar, es kommen also alle
 Menus und Abfragen, aber es wird nichts geändert, die
 Datei /etc/environment bleibt unverändert, eine Fehlermeldung kommt auch
 nicht.

Wenn ich mich recht erinnere war das ein Sid-System? Da wurde das
geaendert, die Locale-Informationen werden in /etc/default/locale
abgelegt (gilt auch fuer Etch) und werden von den Programmen auch dort
erwartet.

Andreas

-- 
Don't you wish you had more energy... or less ambition?


-- 
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): 
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/

Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)



Re: Problem mit apt-get localeconf

2006-11-16 Thread Peter Kuechler
Am Donnerstag, den 16.11.2006, 13:01 +0100 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
 On 16.11.06 12:43:05, Peter Kuechler wrote:
  Leider hab ich jetzt ein anderes Problem:
  
  Ein dpkg-reconfigure localeconf funktioniert zwar, es kommen also alle
  Menus und Abfragen, aber es wird nichts geändert, die
  Datei /etc/environment bleibt unverändert, eine Fehlermeldung kommt auch
  nicht.
 
 Wenn ich mich recht erinnere war das ein Sid-System? Da wurde das

Richtig!

 geaendert, die Locale-Informationen werden in /etc/default/locale
 abgelegt (gilt auch fuer Etch) und werden von den Programmen auch dort
 erwartet.

Merkwürdig...

Bei mir steht in dieser Datei:

 #  File generated by update-locale
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ein 

dpkg-reconfigure localeconf

ändert daran absolut nichts. Wenn ich aber per Hand diesen Teil

### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION FOR localeconf
# Do not edit within this region if you want your changes to be
preserved
# by debconf.  Instead, make changes before the ### BEGIN DEBCONF
SECTION
# FOR localeconf line, and/or after the ### END DEBCONF SECTION FOR
# localeconf line.
LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_COLLATE=C
LC_CTYPE=C
LC_MESSAGES=C
### END DEBCONF SECTION FOR localeconf

in die /etc/environment eintrage, dann werden die locale auch
entsprechen gesetzt. Übrigens wird das in den Menus bei 
dpkg-reconfigure localeconf auch so beschrieben:

The /etc/environment and /etc/locale.gen files, which contain
configuration information for system environment and localization can be
handled automatically by debconf, or manually by you
[...]

Ich bin etwas ratlos, muß ich sagen


-- 
mfg Peter Küchler
Systemadministrator
Planungsverband Ballungsraum
Frankfurt/Rhein-Main
Tel.: 069-2577-1301
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.pvfrm.de



Re: Problem mit apt-get localeconf

2006-11-16 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 16.11.06 14:16:47, Peter Kuechler wrote:
 Am Donnerstag, den 16.11.2006, 13:01 +0100 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
  On 16.11.06 12:43:05, Peter Kuechler wrote:
   Leider hab ich jetzt ein anderes Problem:
   
   Ein dpkg-reconfigure localeconf funktioniert zwar, es kommen also alle
   Menus und Abfragen, aber es wird nichts geändert, die
   Datei /etc/environment bleibt unverändert, eine Fehlermeldung kommt auch
   nicht.
  
  Wenn ich mich recht erinnere war das ein Sid-System? Da wurde das
  geaendert, die Locale-Informationen werden in /etc/default/locale
  abgelegt (gilt auch fuer Etch) und werden von den Programmen auch dort
  erwartet.
 
 Merkwürdig...
 
 Bei mir steht in dieser Datei:
 
  #  File generated by update-locale
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Ein 
 
 dpkg-reconfigure localeconf
 
 ändert daran absolut nichts. Wenn ich aber per Hand diesen Teil

Dann ist localeconf kaputt oder veraltet. Ist localeconf in Sid noch
enthalten?


 ### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION FOR localeconf
 # Do not edit within this region if you want your changes to be
 preserved
 # by debconf.  Instead, make changes before the ### BEGIN DEBCONF
 SECTION
 # FOR localeconf line, and/or after the ### END DEBCONF SECTION FOR
 # localeconf line.
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 LC_COLLATE=C
 LC_CTYPE=C
 LC_MESSAGES=C
 ### END DEBCONF SECTION FOR localeconf
 
 in die /etc/environment eintrage, dann werden die locale auch
 entsprechen gesetzt. Übrigens wird das in den Menus bei 
 dpkg-reconfigure localeconf auch so beschrieben:

Das ist aber falsch. Es funktioniert weil natuerlich nach wie vor auch
/e/environment beim Einloggen eingelesen wird, aber locale-Einstellungen
sollen in /e/d/locale abgelegt werden.

Andreas

-- 
Don't tell any big lies today.  Small ones can be just as effective.


-- 
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): 
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/

Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)



Re: Problem mit apt-get localeconf

2006-11-16 Thread Peter Kuechler
Am Donnerstag, den 16.11.2006, 14:47 +0100 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
 On 16.11.06 14:16:47, Peter Kuechler wrote:
  Am Donnerstag, den 16.11.2006, 13:01 +0100 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
   On 16.11.06 12:43:05, Peter Kuechler wrote:
Leider hab ich jetzt ein anderes Problem:

Ein dpkg-reconfigure localeconf funktioniert zwar, es kommen also alle
Menus und Abfragen, aber es wird nichts geändert, die
Datei /etc/environment bleibt unverändert, eine Fehlermeldung kommt auch
nicht.
   
   Wenn ich mich recht erinnere war das ein Sid-System? Da wurde das
   geaendert, die Locale-Informationen werden in /etc/default/locale
   abgelegt (gilt auch fuer Etch) und werden von den Programmen auch dort
   erwartet.
  
  Merkwürdig...
  
  Bei mir steht in dieser Datei:
  
   #  File generated by update-locale
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Ein 
  
  dpkg-reconfigure localeconf
  
  ändert daran absolut nichts. Wenn ich aber per Hand diesen Teil
 
 Dann ist localeconf kaputt oder veraltet. Ist localeconf in Sid noch
 enthalten?

Ja.
Die Version ist 0.9.4.1.
Soll das verschwinden??

  ### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION FOR localeconf
  # Do not edit within this region if you want your changes to be
  preserved
  # by debconf.  Instead, make changes before the ### BEGIN DEBCONF
  SECTION
  # FOR localeconf line, and/or after the ### END DEBCONF SECTION FOR
  # localeconf line.
  LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
  LC_COLLATE=C
  LC_CTYPE=C
  LC_MESSAGES=C
  ### END DEBCONF SECTION FOR localeconf
  
  in die /etc/environment eintrage, dann werden die locale auch
  entsprechen gesetzt. Übrigens wird das in den Menus bei 
  dpkg-reconfigure localeconf auch so beschrieben:
 
 Das ist aber falsch. Es funktioniert weil natuerlich nach wie vor auch
 /e/environment beim Einloggen eingelesen wird, aber locale-Einstellungen
 sollen in /e/d/locale abgelegt werden.

Ok...bezieht sich das auch auf den Eintrag LANG=de_DE.UTF-8?
Der Wird scheinbar von update-locale in /etc/default/locale geschrieben
und existiert somit doppelt. Scheinbar ist das aber die datei die zu
letzt gelesen wird und somit auch gilt.

Ich habe das jetzt mal versucht:

update-locale LC_COLLATE=C LC_CTYPE=C LC_MESSAGES=C

hat /etc/default/locale um die neuen Eintraege ergänzt und sie
funktionieren auch. Fragt sich nur, was mit /etc/environment ist bzw.
wird. Fällt die weg?




-- 
mfg Peter Küchler
Systemadministrator
Planungsverband Ballungsraum
Frankfurt/Rhein-Main
Tel.: 069-2577-1301
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.pvfrm.de



Re: Problem mit apt-get localeconf

2006-11-16 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 17.11.06 07:42:23, Peter Kuechler wrote:
 Am Donnerstag, den 16.11.2006, 14:47 +0100 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
  Dann ist localeconf kaputt oder veraltet. Ist localeconf in Sid noch
  enthalten?
 
 Ja.
 Die Version ist 0.9.4.1.
 Soll das verschwinden??

Schau nochmal genauer hin. Das ist die Version aus Sarge, in Etch gibts
kein localeconf mehr und Sid hat diesselbe Version. Also wuerde ich
annehmen, dass das Paket nicht mehr entwickelt wird.

  Das ist aber falsch. Es funktioniert weil natuerlich nach wie vor auch
  /e/environment beim Einloggen eingelesen wird, aber locale-Einstellungen
  sollen in /e/d/locale abgelegt werden.
 
 Ok...bezieht sich das auch auf den Eintrag LANG=de_DE.UTF-8?

Das bezieht sich auf alle Angaben bzgl. der Locale.

 Ich habe das jetzt mal versucht:
 
 update-locale LC_COLLATE=C LC_CTYPE=C LC_MESSAGES=C
 
 hat /etc/default/locale um die neuen Eintraege ergänzt und sie
 funktionieren auch. Fragt sich nur, was mit /etc/environment ist bzw.
 wird. Fällt die weg?

/e/environment wird nach wie vor benutzt um Umgebungsvariablen zu setzen
die fuer alle User gelten sollen und alle Shells. Lies mal die NEWS
Datei des Pakets locales, da wird das ganze erlaeutert.

Andreas

-- 
Your step will soil many countries.


-- 
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): 
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/

Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)



Re: Problem mit apt-get localeconf

2006-11-16 Thread Peter Kuechler
On Fr, 2006-11-17 at 08:09 +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
 On 17.11.06 07:42:23, Peter Kuechler wrote:
  Am Donnerstag, den 16.11.2006, 14:47 +0100 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
   Dann ist localeconf kaputt oder veraltet. Ist localeconf in Sid noch
   enthalten?
  
  Ja.
  Die Version ist 0.9.4.1.
  Soll das verschwinden??
 
 Schau nochmal genauer hin. Das ist die Version aus Sarge, in Etch gibts
 kein localeconf mehr und Sid hat diesselbe Version. Also wuerde ich
 annehmen, dass das Paket nicht mehr entwickelt wird.

Das ist der letzte Eintrag im Changelog:

localeconf (0.9.4.1) unstable; urgency=low
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:01:29 -0300

   Das ist aber falsch. Es funktioniert weil natuerlich nach wie vor auch
   /e/environment beim Einloggen eingelesen wird, aber locale-Einstellungen
   sollen in /e/d/locale abgelegt werden.
  
  Ok...bezieht sich das auch auf den Eintrag LANG=de_DE.UTF-8?
 
 Das bezieht sich auf alle Angaben bzgl. der Locale.
 
  Ich habe das jetzt mal versucht:
  
  update-locale LC_COLLATE=C LC_CTYPE=C LC_MESSAGES=C
  
  hat /etc/default/locale um die neuen Eintraege ergänzt und sie
  funktionieren auch. Fragt sich nur, was mit /etc/environment ist bzw.
  wird. Fällt die weg?
 
 /e/environment wird nach wie vor benutzt um Umgebungsvariablen zu setzen
 die fuer alle User gelten sollen und alle Shells. Lies mal die NEWS
 Datei des Pakets locales, da wird das ganze erlaeutert.

Guter Tip, werde ich mir mal ansehen.
localeconf werde ich mal wegschmeissen.

Danke für die Hilfe,


-- 
mfg Peter Küchler
Systemadministrator
Planungsverband Ballungsraum
Frankfurt/Rhein-Main
Tel.: 069-2577-1301
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.pvfrm.de



Re: Problem with apt-get after enabling unstable tree

2006-09-21 Thread Kaspar Fischer

Liam and Ismael,

Thanks a lot for your answers; I read the article

  http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html

about apt pinning and set up my /etc/apt/preferences
according to this -- great.

Also, I used apt-show-versions to find the packages from
unstable:

backup:/mnt# apt-get remove gcc-3.3-base sysv-rc ncftp samba libss2  
mkvmlinuz smbfs libncurses5 base-files libkrb53 manpages libtasn1-3  
emacsen-common initrd-tools samba-common tzdata swat  libgpg-error0  
libreadline5 amiga-fdisk libgnutls13 ssl-cert mailx libdb4.3 libpam- 
runtime makedev readline-common libcupsys2 debconf-i18n python2.3  
locales smbclient libpopt0 samba-doc libssl0.9.8 console-data  
libkrb5-17-heimdal libgcrypt11 libgssapi4-heimdal mime-support  
debconf libtext-wrapi18n-perl netatalk libc6 libopencdk8 libroken16- 
heimdal hotplug lsb-base pppconfig

Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  adduser amiga-fdisk apache2-common apache2-mpm-prefork apache2- 
utils apt
  apt-show-versions apt-utils aptitude at base-files base-passwd  
bash binutils

  bsdmainutils bsdutils bzip2 console-common console-data console-tools
  coreutils cpio cramfsprogs cron curl dash db4.2-util debconf  
debconf-i18n
  debianutils dhcp-client diff discover1 dpkg dselect e2fslibs  
e2fsprogs ed
  eject emacs21-bin-common emacs21-common emacs21-nox emacsen-common  
exim4
  exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light fdutils findutils  
gcc-3.3-base
  gettext-base grep groff-base gzip hdparm hfsutils hostname hotplug  
ifupdown

  info initrd-tools initscripts ipchains iperf iptables iputils-ping
  kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc klogd less libacl1 libapache2-mod-php4  
libapr0

  libapt-pkg-perl libasn1-6-heimdal libattr1 libblkid1 libbz2-1.0 libc6
  libcap1 libcomerr2 libconsole libcupsys2 libcurl3 libdb1-compat  
libdb3

  libdb4.1 libdb4.2 libdb4.3 libdiscover1 libexpat1 libgcc1 libgcrypt11
  libgdbm3 libgnutls11 libgnutls13 libgpg-error0 libgssapi4-heimdal  
libidn11

  libkrb-1-kerberos4kth libkrb5-17-heimdal libkrb53 libldap2
  liblocale-gettext-perl liblockfile1 liblzo1 libmagic1 libncurses5
  libncursesw5 libneon24 libnewt0.51 libopencdk8 libpam-modules  
libpam-runtime

  libpam0g libpcap0.7 libpcre3 libperl5.8 libpopt0 libreadline5
  libroken16-heimdal libsasl2 libsigc++-1.2-5c102 libslp1 libss2  
libssl0.9.7
  libssl0.9.8 libstdc++5 libsvn0 libtasn1-2 libtasn1-3 libtext- 
charwidth-perl
  libtext-iconv-perl libtext-wrapi18n-perl libtextwrap1 libusb-0.1-4  
libuuid1

  libwrap0 libxml2 libzzip-0-12 locales login logrotate lsb-base lynx
  mac-fdisk mailx makedev man-db manpages mawk mime-support mkvmlinuz
  module-init-tools modutils mount nano ncftp ncurses-bin net-tools  
netatalk

  netbase netkit-inetd ntpdate nvi openssl passwd patch pciutils perl
  perl-base perl-modules php4-cgi php4-cli php4-common powerpc-utils  
ppp
  pppconfig pppoe pppoeconf procps psmisc python python2.3 readline- 
common
  samba samba-common samba-doc sed slang1a-utf8 smbclient smbfs ssh  
ssl-cert
  subversion swat sysklogd sysv-rc sysvinit tar tasksel tcpd telnet  
traceroute

  tzdata usbutils util-linux wget whiptail yaboot zlib1g
WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
  apt libc6 (due to apt) libgcc1 (due to apt) libstdc++5 (due to apt)
  base-files base-passwd (due to base-files) bash passwd (due to bash)
  libncurses5 (due to bash) bsdutils coreutils libacl1 (due to  
coreutils)
  debianutils diff dpkg dselect (due to dpkg) e2fsprogs e2fslibs  
(due to
  e2fsprogs) libblkid1 (due to e2fsprogs) libcomerr2 (due to  
e2fsprogs) libss2
  (due to e2fsprogs) libuuid1 (due to e2fsprogs) findutils grep gzip  
hostname
  login libpam-modules (due to login) libpam0g (due to login) libpam- 
runtime
  (due to login) mount ncurses-bin perl-base sed sysvinit  
initscripts (due to
  sysvinit) sysv-rc (due to sysvinit) tar util-linux slang1a-utf8  
(due to

  util-linux) zlib1g (due to util-linux)
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 210 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 341MB disk space will be freed.
You are about to do something potentially harmful
To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'
?]

Here, unfortunatley, I lack to courage to type Yes, do as I say! ;-)

Will I afterwards be able to install these packages again from stable?
Or will my system be in a inconsistent state?

Kaspar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




  1   2   3   4   >