Re: Problem with named
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Pollywog wrote: pollyw >Don't you mean /etc/host.conf? doh..i guess i do :) on irix its stored in /etc/resolv.conf ..didnt know debian stored it in host.conf .. is host.conf a standard thing ? i seem to remember(incorrectly maybe) that my slackware 3.2/3.4 also stored it in resolv.conf .. nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- 7:39pm up 88 days, 7:12, 1 user, load average: 1.48, 1.71, 1.96
Re: Problem with named
> > Brian> name. How can I fix this problem? Also, how can I add some machine > Brian> records to the files. I have tried following the howto's and the > readmes > Brian> but I have had no luck yet. > > Nate> best way to do that is to add it to /etc/hosts, and change your > Nate> /etc/resolv.conf so it has this in it: > > Nate> order local,bind Don't you mean /etc/host.conf? -- Andrew
Re: Problem with named
On 15 Nov 1999, Ian Zimmerman wrote: itz >Hmm, doesn't that defeat the purpose of running named in the first itz >place? I'd add a new zone file and reference it from /etc/named.conf. i run named mainly on my dialup for ipmasq. for some reason DNS does not get masq'd for me under kernel 2.2 ..it masqs fine under 2.0 but i could never get it workin under 2.2. i suppose adding a new zone for a local network would be useful but unless its a big one i cant imagine a real advantage over just using hosts .. nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- 2:20pm up 88 days, 1:53, 1 user, load average: 1.69, 1.58, 1.56
Re: Problem with named
> "Nate" == aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brian> name. How can I fix this problem? Also, how can I add some machine Brian> records to the files. I have tried following the howto's and the readmes Brian> but I have had no luck yet. Nate> best way to do that is to add it to /etc/hosts, and change your Nate> /etc/resolv.conf so it has this in it: Nate> order local,bind Nate> so it will search hosts before it asks the DNS for host info. Hmm, doesn't that defeat the purpose of running named in the first place? I'd add a new zone file and reference it from /etc/named.conf. -- Ian Zimmerman Lightbinders, Inc. 2325 3rd Street #324, San Francisco, California 94107
Re: Problem with named
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Brian Schramm wrote: bschra >I have a small network at home that I am running named on. I am also bschra >using yi.org's free dynamic dns for my internet name. I have had some bschra >trouble with my two machines on the prifate network. If I type nslookup I bschra >get the address of the machine back with a message saying it cannot find bschra >the name of that machine. I then go into it with localhost as the machine try removing all 'nameserver' entries from resolv.conf it will cause the programs to lookup at 0.0.0.0 ..which should work (for me it does) also make sure that the machine is running a named and it is working, try to resolve stuff on it from another machine (you may have to add a listen option in named.conf to have it listen on the right ip(s)/port(s)) bschra >name. How can I fix this problem? Also, how can I add some machine bschra >records to the files. I have tried following the howto's and the readmes bschra >but I have had no luck yet. best way to do that is to add it to /etc/hosts, and change your /etc/resolv.conf so it has this in it: order local,bind so it will search hosts before it asks the DNS for host info. HTH nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By:http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMPhttp://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- 2:04pm up 85 days, 1:36, 1 user, load average: 1.87, 1.81, 1.66
Problem with named
I have a small network at home that I am running named on. I am also using yi.org's free dynamic dns for my internet name. I have had some trouble with my two machines on the prifate network. If I type nslookup I get the address of the machine back with a message saying it cannot find the name of that machine. I then go into it with localhost as the machine name. How can I fix this problem? Also, how can I add some machine records to the files. I have tried following the howto's and the readmes but I have had no luck yet. Thanks. Brian Schramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.linuxexpert.org
URGENT-problem with named
hello, On 13 Oct I ask the maintainer of ro domain to change the name and IP address of my DNS. old: ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> @ns.ici.ro ns citon.ro ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 2 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; citon.ro, type = NS, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: citon.ro. 4D IN NSpub.pub.ro. citon.ro. 4D IN NSB659.citon.ro. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: pub.pub.ro. 1D IN A 141.85.128.1 B659.citon.ro. 4D IN A 193.226.61.100 ;; Total query time: 20 msec ;; FROM: romsys-sun to SERVER: ns.ici.ro 192.162.16.21 ;; WHEN: Fri Oct 9 13:57:07 1998 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 26 rcvd: 101 new: ; <<>> DiG 2.1 <<>> @ns.ici.ro ns citon.ro. ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 ;; flags: qr rd ra; Ques: 1, Ans: 2, Auth: 0, Addit: 2 ;; QUESTIONS: ;; citon.ro, type = NS, class = IN ;; ANSWERS: citon.ro. 345600 NS router.citon.ro. citon.ro. 345600 NS pub.pub.ro. ;; ADDITIONAL RECORDS: router.citon.ro.345600 A 193.231.157.1 pub.pub.ro. 86400 A 141.85.128.1 ;; Total query time: 27 msec ;; FROM: alpha to SERVER: ns.ici.ro 192.162.16.21 ;; WHEN: Tue Oct 20 10:23:35 1998 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 26 rcvd: 103 I modify the root.hints cache file: /var/named/zone/root.hints ; <<>> DiG 2.2 <<>> @ns.internic.net . ns ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 ;; flags: qr aa rd; Ques: 1, Ans: 13, Auth: 0, Addit: 13 ;; QUESTIONS: ;; ., type = NS, class = IN ;; ANSWERS: . NS pub.pub.ro. pub.pub.ro. A 141.85.128.1 ;; Total query time: 6070 msec ;; FROM: waiting to SERVER: ns.internic.net 198.41.0.4 ;; WHEN: Thu Jul 17 16:55:43 1997 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 17 rcvd: 436 The problem is that when I restart the named (ndc restart; ndc reload) I get the next message: Oct 20 09:23:51 router named[2770]: named shutting down Oct 20 09:23:51 router named[2770]: USAGE 908900631 908900312 CPU=0.28u/0.07s CHILDCPU=0u/0s Oct 20 09:23:51 router named[2770]: NSTATS 908900631 908900312 A=10 PTR=5 MX=1 Oct 20 09:23:51 router named[2770]: XSTATS 908900631 908900312 RR=18 RNXD=1 RFwdR=8 RDupR=0 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=0 RAXFR=0 RLame=4 ROpts$ Oct 20 09:23:56 router named[2809]: starting. named 8.1.2-T3B Sun Jun 7 23:43:52 MDT 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/bdale/debian/bind-8.1.2$ Oct 20 09:23:56 router named[2809]: cache zone "" (IN) loaded (serial 0) Oct 20 09:23:56 router named[2809]: master zone "127.in-addr.arpa" (IN) loaded (serial 1998100702) Oct 20 09:23:56 router named[2809]: master zone "citon.ro" (IN) loaded (serial 1998100707) Oct 20 09:23:57 router named[2809]: master zone "193.231.157.in-addr.arpa" (IN) loaded (serial 1998100706) Oct 20 09:23:57 router named[2809]: listening on [127.0.0.1].53 (lo) Oct 20 09:23:57 router named[2809]: listening on [193.231.44.100].53 (eth0) Oct 20 09:23:57 router named[2809]: listening on [193.231.157.1].53 (eth1) Oct 20 09:23:57 router named[2809]: Forwarding source address is [0.0.0.0].1947 Oct 20 09:23:57 router named[2810]: Ready to answer queries. Oct 20 09:28:44 router named[2810]: sysquery: findns error (NXDOMAIN) on B659.citon.ro? Oct 20 09:28:46 router named[2810]: sysquery: findns error (NXDOMAIN) on B659.citon.ro? Oct 20 09:28:50 router named[2810]: Lame server on '11.157.231.193.in-addr.arpa' (in '157.231.193.in-addr.arpa'?): [141.85.128.1].53 'pub.pub.ro': learnt (A=141.85.128.1,NS=141.85.128.1) Why it try to lookup to the B659.citon.ro? Please tell me what to do I have to do because I have no idea. TIA \\\___/// \\ - - // ( @ @ ) -oOOo-(_)-oOOo *Bubulac Angela Tatiana - National Institute for R&D of Materials Physics* * Bucuresti - Magurele P.O.B. MG-7 * * Romania* *e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | phone :401-7805385 int.1380 * *[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 401-7806925 * * | 401-7804573 * --Oooo oooO ( ) ( )) / \ ((_/ \_)
problem with named
Hiya. I have a constant problem with a server of us (the only Debian server, it's been hard enough to convince them to install Debian on it)... There're some errors you might already know, so I'm asking: Aug 2 09:01:37 cephyr named[17820]: Malformed response from [194.221.77.66].53 (answer to wrong question) Aug 2 09:01:42 cephyr named[17820]: Malformed response from [130.149.17.5].53 ( answer to wrong question) Aug 2 09:01:49 cephyr icmplogd: destination unreachable from localhost Aug 2 09:01:56 cephyr named[17820]: Malformed response from [194.112.92.33].53 (answer to wrong question) Aug 2 09:02:12 cephyr named[17820]: Malformed response from [141.1.1.1].53 (ans wer to wrong question) There can't be so many incorrect nameservers, or what is wrong there? Additionally another error comes up: Aug 2 02:32:55 cephyr named[17820]: Err/TO getting serial# for "musictus.com" What exactly does this message mean? When I delete the files in /var/named/ they get reloaded (or fetched, yes) correctly, if I only restart bind, the files are also reloaded correctly... At the very last thought, what are these syslog messages telling me? Aug 2 09:25:19 cephyr icmplogd: destination unreachable from cephyr.cid-net.de Aug 2 09:25:40 cephyr icmplogd: destination unreachable from cephyr.cid-net.de There're two routes going out. default is the router and the other is the subnet. What is wrong here? What is unreachable? Sorry, I'm not really getting the point... Clueless, to put it that way. Any hints appreciated. Alexander (please CC me as I'm not getting this list at work and I'm not at home...) -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
[NAME SERVICE] Re: problem with named
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sat, 2 Aug 1997, Alexander Koch wrote: > Aug 2 09:01:37 cephyr named[17820]: Malformed response from > [194.221.77.66].53 > (answer to wrong question) > Aug 2 09:01:42 cephyr named[17820]: Malformed response from > [130.149.17.5].53 ( > answer to wrong question) > Aug 2 09:01:49 cephyr icmplogd: destination unreachable from localhost > Aug 2 09:01:56 cephyr named[17820]: Malformed response from > [194.112.92.33].53 > (answer to wrong question) > Aug 2 09:02:12 cephyr named[17820]: Malformed response from [141.1.1.1].53 > (ans > wer to wrong question) > > There can't be so many incorrect nameservers, or what is wrong there? Unfortunately, yes there are. > Additionally another error comes up: > > Aug 2 02:32:55 cephyr named[17820]: Err/TO getting serial# for "musictus.com" There might have been some problem obtaining the packets from this nameserver - perhaps the response was truncated, or the UDP packet failed its checksum, or the connection via TCP (if established) was broken. > What exactly does this message mean? When I delete the files in /var/named/ > they get reloaded (or fetched, yes) correctly, if I only restart bind, the > files are also reloaded correctly... Which files? Are you a secondary or primary for the above site? [snip - another problem, unrelated to named] Anand. - -- `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBM+SgemRmcAD8BdppAQG+AQP5AbEiofkgAxD92vXci0O3whLrLnytjJQb CqStqthVp/haWBFc820hCEGGTyNuk/MQgxB57cC/talOzWzvw1oHU5n648EavO/q EDPa2vcl9OmsWJohQiV67n7PQ+eIwJFh8uL64YedP0+lPbV/UO8RzPOgEnk/d1/k TaadBkT9MXU= =6qZa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
[IPLOGGER] Odd log messages Was: problem with named
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sat, 2 Aug 1997, Alexander Koch wrote: > Aug 2 09:25:19 cephyr icmplogd: destination unreachable from > cephyr.cid-net.de > Aug 2 09:25:40 cephyr icmplogd: destination unreachable from > cephyr.cid-net.de > > There're two routes going out. default is the router and the other is the > subnet. What is wrong here? What is unreachable? These message are beging generated becasue you have the iplogger package installed. The iplogger package sets the interfaces into promiscuous mode and log any unusual ICMP, TCP or UDP packes that it sees. Destination unreachable _could_ be a sign of a problem, but if when you check things you find that you still have connectivity then what is most likely happening is that someone running traceroute - traceroute generates a lot of destination unreachable packets [or is that port unreachable?] Another possiblity is that of your machines has got the wrong subnet mask - - if you know how to, I'd run tcpdump and log the ICMP packets and see where cephyr is replying to, and then check that machine. Anand. - -- `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBM+SivmRmcAD8BdppAQHUzAQA3qX0GSX24b9e1GgKui7F2R9WzEt76lfG q4frg3RxewR+DtLWNMM8Fy08i11MHjg4qEaN9xzucHcN8BfbSMgkGZG8IL7CHfuc RrLPDToTx+4ZGxAQiet53y2/G3Qq48a/TD2xijQNf8uNDSTf5wMSLKOVTDVoX8eg fYT0Pb4yOYM= =4t/p -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: [IPLOGGER] Odd log messages Was: problem with named
Anand Kumria wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Sat, 2 Aug 1997, Alexander Koch wrote: > > > Aug 2 09:25:19 cephyr icmplogd: destination unreachable from > > cephyr.cid-net.de > > Aug 2 09:25:40 cephyr icmplogd: destination unreachable from > > cephyr.cid-net.de > > > > There're two routes going out. default is the router and the other is the > > subnet. What is wrong here? What is unreachable? > > These message are beging generated becasue you have the iplogger package > installed. The iplogger package sets the interfaces into promiscuous mode > and log any unusual ICMP, TCP or UDP packes that it sees. > > Destination unreachable _could_ be a sign of a problem, but if when you > check things you find that you still have connectivity then what is most > likely happening is that someone running traceroute - traceroute generates > a lot of destination unreachable packets [or is that port unreachable?] Neither. If the TTL field reaches zero a gateway will respond with an ICMP Time Exceeded Message (ICMP type 11). traceroute would generate "lots" of these packets. If a packet reaches the destination host and the destination port is inactive, the host would generate a Destination Unreachable (ICMP type 3) with the Code = 3 indicating that the port was unreachable. Running traceroute would cause one of these packets to be generated. I've found destination unreachable messages to most often be seen from attempts to deliver mail. If the target host is very busy (and on many systems this is quite often the case) no more SMTP connections may be able to be made at the moment, in which case a dest. unreachable message would be generated. It would be nice if the iplogger would include the rest of the info which comes in such a message. > Another possiblity is that of your machines has got the wrong subnet mask > - - if you know how to, I'd run tcpdump and log the ICMP packets and see > where cephyr is replying to, and then check that machine. > -- Jens B. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
