Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-28 Thread green
Kevin Ross wrote at 2009-10-28 14:27 -0500:
> I think the 2d2 would be a better choice for the OP, since it includes 2 LAN
> ports instead of one.  Couple it with one of their nifty little enclosures
> and AC adapter, and you're set!

I didn't see the enclosures on the site earlier, but I do now.  Is ALIX the 
name of the form factor, or just the name of the product line?

Are there enclosures available that will hold also a hard drive, either 2.5- or 
3.5-inch?  And the drive would have to be IDE it seems...


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


RE: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-28 Thread Kevin Ross
> From: Nick Lidakis [mailto:nlida...@verizon.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:42 PM
> 
> The Alix 3d2 board is available for about $100 USD.
> 

Cool, thanks for the heads up!

I think the 2d2 would be a better choice for the OP, since it includes 2 LAN
ports instead of one.  Couple it with one of their nifty little enclosures
and AC adapter, and you're set!

-- Kevin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread Nick Lidakis
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:51:45PM -0500, green wrote:
> 
> Okay, just wanted to be sure that Debian was "supported", as in Voyage is not 
> a 
> significant change from Debian.

Voyage gives you a nifty script to install it on compact flash, with
appropriate targets for specific hardware, e.g., alix, standard pc, soekris.
The alix target has all the appropriate hardware support, i.e., geode cpu,
support to control the LED's, etc.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread green
Nick Lidakis wrote at 2009-10-27 21:32 -0500:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:32:22PM -0500, green wrote:
> > Nick Lidakis wrote at 2009-10-27 16:41 -0500:
> > > You could could Voyage Linux directly from a compact flash. Link:
> > > http://linux.voyage.hk/ It's basically Debian for x86 embedded devices. It
> > > keeps apt and runs the entire OS is RAM.
> > 
> > It would be possible to run Debian, though?
> 
> Yeah, sure. But Voyage is basically Debian designed to run in RAM, this way
> you don't keep writing to the compact flash card. You can apt-get
> anything. 

Okay, just wanted to be sure that Debian was "supported", as in Voyage is not a 
significant change from Debian.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread Nick Lidakis
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:32:22PM -0500, green wrote:
> Nick Lidakis wrote at 2009-10-27 16:41 -0500:
> > You could could Voyage Linux directly from a compact flash. Link:
> > http://linux.voyage.hk/ It's basically Debian for x86 embedded devices. It
> > keeps apt and runs the entire OS is RAM.
> 
> It would be possible to run Debian, though?

Yeah, sure. But Voyage is basically Debian designed to run in RAM, this way
you don't keep writing to the compact flash card. You can apt-get
anything. 

I guess you could also boot regular Debian off of a USB disk. The
bigger boards also have a 44 pin IDE connector. Maybe use a 
2.5" laptop drive??


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread green
Nick Lidakis wrote at 2009-10-27 16:41 -0500:
> You could consider a similarly priced hardware alternative. You ever 
> hear of the PC Engines Alix boards? Link: http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm

Interesting, thanks for the tip.

> You could could Voyage Linux directly from a compact flash. Link:
> http://linux.voyage.hk/ It's basically Debian for x86 embedded devices. It
> keeps apt and runs the entire OS is RAM.

It would be possible to run Debian, though?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread Nick Lidakis
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:52:36PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 Oct 2009, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> > Are you referring to the Sheeva plug computer?
> > 
> Yes

You could consider a similarly priced hardware alternative. You ever 
hear of the PC Engines Alix boards? Link: http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm

They come in a variety of configurations. Generally, you get x86 Geode CPU,
1 to 3 ethernet ports, more than 1 USb port, mini-PCI slots, 256MB RAM, a DC
jack that supports anywhere from 7v to 20v DC, serial ports, and the ability
to run Coreboot (formerly LinuxBIOS). 

You could could Voyage Linux directly from a compact flash. Link:
http://linux.voyage.hk/ It's basically Debian for x86 embedded devices. It
keeps apt and runs the entire OS is RAM.

The Alix 3d2 board is available for about $100 USD. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread Alan Chandler
On Tuesday 27 Oct 2009, Alex Samad wrote:
 
> you are leaving yourself open for all sorts of problems, there is
> nothing between your other computers and the internet.
> 
> get the usb network dongle

You are probably right - I am complicating things for no good reason.

Just as an aside, there seems to be a varierty of usb to ethernet 
connectors, at a variety of different prices.  Some seem to be so cheep 
that they can be little more than a usb connector and rj45 connector.  
Do they all work with standard debian?

-- 
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread Alan Chandler
On Tuesday 27 Oct 2009, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:58:18AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > I am contemplating the possibilities with the plug computer, as an
> > always on, router/firewall/web server for my house.
> 
> Are you referring to the Sheeva plug computer?
> 
Yes

-- 
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread Alex Samad
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 04:04:06PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 Oct 2009, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:58:18AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> ...
> > >
> > > What I am less certain about is how I can cater for Wireless
> > > clients coming in over the WAP, who do really need dhcp allocated
> > > addresses.  My guess is that they would be requesting leases via
> > > some broadcasting mechanism, and that there is no way for the
> > > ethernet switch to prevent them going to the cable modem (and
> > > thence to my isp) and the dhcp server at my isp responding.
> > >
> > Alternatively, hardcode IPs for everything on that switch. You
> > can either hardcode IPs for your wireless devices, or run DHCP
> > on a separate subnet  there.
> 
> I think that is the answer, limit the switch to have the cable modem, 
> plug computer and existing cable router on it.  the "lan" side of that 
> cable router will be where I connect everything else and can use dhcp 
> with confidence there.
you are leaving yourself open for all sorts of problems, there is
nothing between your other computers and the internet.

get the usb network dongle

> 
> I presume nfs (which I have not used before) will still work connecting 
> the plug computer as an nfs client throught the router (which is a NAT 
> device) to one of the backend servers running a large disk and the nfs 
> server end if I port forward correctly. [one particular usage of my 
> external web site is to provide access to some large files - I am happy 
> for this to fail if I turn off my in home computing environment leaving 
> only the plug computer running.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
"Free societies are hopeful societies. And free societies will be allies 
against these hateful few who have no conscience, who kill at the whim of a 
hat."

- George W. Bush
09/17/2004
Washington, DC


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread Nick Lidakis
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:58:18AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> I am contemplating the possibilities with the plug computer, as an 
> always on, router/firewall/web server for my house.

Are you referring to the Sheeva plug computer?  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread Alan Chandler
On Tuesday 27 Oct 2009, Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:58:18AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
...
> >
> > What I am less certain about is how I can cater for Wireless
> > clients coming in over the WAP, who do really need dhcp allocated
> > addresses.  My guess is that they would be requesting leases via
> > some broadcasting mechanism, and that there is no way for the
> > ethernet switch to prevent them going to the cable modem (and
> > thence to my isp) and the dhcp server at my isp responding.
> >
> Alternatively, hardcode IPs for everything on that switch. You
> can either hardcode IPs for your wireless devices, or run DHCP
> on a separate subnet  there.

I think that is the answer, limit the switch to have the cable modem, 
plug computer and existing cable router on it.  the "lan" side of that 
cable router will be where I connect everything else and can use dhcp 
with confidence there.

I presume nfs (which I have not used before) will still work connecting 
the plug computer as an nfs client throught the router (which is a NAT 
device) to one of the backend servers running a large disk and the nfs 
server end if I port forward correctly. [one particular usage of my 
external web site is to provide access to some large files - I am happy 
for this to fail if I turn off my in home computing environment leaving 
only the plug computer running.



-- 
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread green
Alan Chandler wrote at 2009-10-27 02:58 -0500:
> What I am less certain about is how I can cater for Wireless clients 
> coming in over the WAP, who do really need dhcp allocated addresses.  My 
> guess is that they would be requesting leases via some broadcasting 
> mechanism, and that there is no way for the ethernet switch to prevent 
> them going to the cable modem (and thence to my isp) and the dhcp server 
> at my isp responding.

Could this be solved by using a dhcp server (or forwarder to plug computer 
server) on the wireless AP?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Wondering about doing something strange with networking

2009-10-27 Thread Dan Ritter
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:58:18AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> The remainder of the devices - although ideally should use dhcp, could 
> be configured with static addresses (and therefore also routes) to 
> regard eth0:0 on the plug computer as a gateway (the plug computer would 
> use 192.168.0.1 as its eth0:0 interface IP address, the dhcp allocated 
> address on eth0 would not be in that range).
> 
> I think, in this scenario, the switch would soon learn not to send arp 
> messages saying who has 192.168.0.x address to the cable modem, 
> (although I am not sure it would matter if it did).
> 
> What I am less certain about is how I can cater for Wireless clients 
> coming in over the WAP, who do really need dhcp allocated addresses.  My 
> guess is that they would be requesting leases via some broadcasting 
> mechanism, and that there is no way for the ethernet switch to prevent 
> them going to the cable modem (and thence to my isp) and the dhcp server 
> at my isp responding.
> 
> Is what I am trying to consider impossible?

No, it can work. You are just confused.

The switch does not know anything about IP addresses. It
understands ethernet MAC addresses. 

$ /sbin/ifconfig
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:1d:28:73:b6  
  inet addr:10.1.4.55  Bcast:10.1.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::224:1dff:fe28:73b6/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:12194355 errors:0 dropped:173155950949126

See that HWaddr: field?

That's a MAC address. It should be unique on every network
interface.

Routers are devices that make decisions on the IP level.
Switches make decisions on the ethernet level.

What you will have problems with is running DHCP, as you
mentioned. Here's what you do:

Get a USB-ethernet connector for your plug. Now you have two
ethernet ports. One goes to the cable modem, one goes to your
switch. Life is good.

Alternatively, hardcode IPs for everything on that switch. You
can either hardcode IPs for your wireless devices, or run DHCP
on a separate subnet  there.

-dsr-


-- 
http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference.
You can't defend freedom by getting rid of it.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org