Re: Followup to my last...

2022-01-18 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
Hi,

On 2022-01-18 02:29, R. Toby Richards wrote:
> I'm installing Debian 11. The installer says that it is missing firmware
> files: b43/ucode11.fw, b43/ucode11.fw, b43-open/ucode11.fw and
> b43-open/ucode.fw. If you have such media available now, insert it, and
> continue.
> 
> I downloaded the dang unofficial DVD ISO that supposedly has non-free
> binaries, but the installer won't accept that media as having the
> Broadcom drivers that I need. Sneakernet doesn't work because every
> iteration of the ISO that I try has no working dpkg. I cannot dpkg the
> stuff I need for dpkg to work if dpkg is not working.
> 
> I appreciate your stance on non-free binaries, but at least throw me a
> bone on the unofficial ISO files.
> 
Making fast connection between different unrelated concept doesn't help
both yourself in understanding of the situation AND yourself getting
helped out (as no one seem to willing to help a mad men, risking of
getting bitten).

I have a laptop who's totally off Internet and have a local repository
on hard drive to do my install, so the question about dpkg "not-working"
is odd at least, ridiculous at most.

Have you tried something like using the 1st DVD of the distribution,
install your system (will give you a bare system), you can also use the
live DVD (Gnome/KDE/LXDE/XFCE) and install this as your base system.

Then use a local repository on a HD.

I can install my whole system without Internet connection.
This is the first part of my answer (before you write back that I don't
touch your networking problem).

Yes it's possible you try to install a package and it says "you need Z
package as dependencies". So you simply use your two feet and get the
package, do the install. Once dependencies are solved, you package that
was in a "uninstalled" state will get installed and it's script run.

Seems like you got confused between dpkg and apt-get (and even apt
itself). The dpkg software has no reliance whatsoever on networking and
if my memory's good, it doesn't even use any networking code.

Regarding the bone you are looking for... Life's not binary as in :
It's free so you can share it as you like
It's not free, can't share and that's so bad

There's what's called distribution clause.

If you look at debian packages for the google android sdk, their size is
11mb for the android-sdk-platform-23 package.

Did the brave Debian developer were able to do magic and squeeze it all
inside a 11mb package size ? Even if those guys are some of the best
programmer in the world, the answer is : NO !

And even if they would have been able, they couldn't ! Why ?
Because Google prohibit third parties from distributing Android SDK.

So they build a set of script that will get what's needed from the
server and install it for you.

Something similar also goes on with some game packager where the game
engine is GPL'd but not the game media / data file.

And now for your answer...

This seem to be the case with you device (and some other devices too).

It probably need a firmware binary blob that will be extracted from a
Windows driver package or something similar.

If you find another Linux distro who support your device out of the box,
I'd be really surprised and would love to get the link so I can see how
they work around this problem.

On a last note, you ain't the only one who is using a machine off of
Internet access, so your insolvable "pseudo catch 22" is something that
was already calculated for and taken into account from the start. I'd
remind you that Debian started at a time where not every computer had
Internet access and all the tools for installing from local media are
still available.

A great tool you can discover is called debmirror.

Another thing you can do is a hunger strike against Broadcom, this will
be much more useful over blaming the choice of licensing made by Debian
team.

Hope this get you out of the woods...
Sincerely,

> -- 
> 
> _R. Toby Richards_
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
-Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Followup to my last...

2022-01-18 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
On 1/18/22, Nicolas George  wrote:
> didier gaumet (12022-01-18):
>> If you do not have internet (ethernet) during install, then follow these
>> steps:
>> http://linuxwireless.sipsolutions.net/en/users/Drivers/b43/#Device_firmware_installation
>
> Looks complicated.
>
> Just run "apt-get install", make not of the URLs that fail to download,
> download them from somewhere else and use a USB stick or something to
> transfer.


That's what I was thinking I'd seen suggested here before, too. I did
a quick "apt-cache search" for the bcm43 that Didier mentioned because
I remember encountering that in the past. This limited list came back
so it's here in whole:

b43-fwcutter - utility for extracting Broadcom 43xx firmware
firmware-b43-installer - firmware installer for the b43 driver
firmware-b43legacy-installer - firmware installer for the b43legacy driver
broadcom-sta-common - Common files for the Broadcom STA Wireless driver
broadcom-sta-dkms - dkms source for the Broadcom STA Wireless driver
broadcom-sta-source - Source for the Broadcom STA Wireless driver
firmware-brcm80211 - Binary firmware for Broadcom/Cypress 802.11 wireless cards

Cindy :)
-- 
Cindy-Sue Causey
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA
* runs with birdseed *



Re: Followup to my last...

2022-01-18 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 11:29:12PM -0800, R. Toby  Richards wrote:
> I'm installing Debian 11. The installer says that it is missing firmware
> files: b43/ucode11.fw, b43/ucode11.fw, b43-open/ucode11.fw and
> b43-open/ucode.fw. If you have such media available now, insert it, and
> continue.

You've shown b43/ucode11.fw twice, but let's skip that for now.

None of the files you show here are present in any packages in Debian,
according to https://packages.debian.org/.

This particular device looks like it's a special case, where Debian
isn't allowed to distribute the firmware directly, not even in non-free.
Have a look at the firmware-b43-installer package:

https://packages.debian.org/stretch/firmware-b43-installer

Rather than providing the firmware themselves, Debian have created this
package that will download the firmware from ... somewhere ... and package
it up for you.

Obviously, in order for this to work on a single machine, you'll need
a different means of accessing the Internet from that machine (e.g.
a wired ethernet connection).

If you dislike this situation, take it up with Broadcom.  Presumably it's
their license on the firmware that's causing your distress.



Re: Followup to my last...

2022-01-18 Thread Nicolas George
didier gaumet (12022-01-18):
> If you do not have internet (ethernet) during install, then follow these 
> steps:
> http://linuxwireless.sipsolutions.net/en/users/Drivers/b43/#Device_firmware_installation

Looks complicated.

Just run "apt-get install", make not of the URLs that fail to download,
download them from somewhere else and use a USB stick or something to
transfer.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Followup to my last...

2022-01-18 Thread didier gaumet
Le mardi 18 janvier 2022 à 09:22 +, piorunz a écrit :
[...]
> I suggest go to this link below and read about
> Broadcom install procedures:
> https://wiki.debian.org/bcm43xx

Hello,

I have had bcm43xx chipsets in the past. Broadcom has/had a particularly 
limitative policy about distributing binaries, and albeit Debian not 
distributing firmwares by default (offical releases), at the time installing 
other distros (Fedora,...) with bcm43xx chipsets was even more tedious than 
Debian, even if these distros distribute firmwares...

I would concur with Piorunz: follow the steps detailed by the wiki:
https://wiki.debian.org/bcm43xx

If you do not have internet (ethernet) during install, then follow these steps:
http://linuxwireless.sipsolutions.net/en/users/Drivers/b43/#Device_firmware_installation



Re: Followup to my last...

2022-01-18 Thread piorunz

On 18/01/2022 07:29, R. Toby Richards wrote:

I'm installing Debian 11. The installer says that it is missing firmware
files: b43/ucode11.fw, b43/ucode11.fw, b43-open/ucode11.fw and
b43-open/ucode.fw. If you have such media available now, insert it, and
continue.

I downloaded the dang unofficial DVD ISO that supposedly has non-free
binaries, but the installer won't accept that media as having the
Broadcom drivers that I need.


You not supposed to give official installer ISO with unofficial
installer as source of files it needs.

You either:
1) *install* from unofficial installer directly,

2) install from official installer, but you need to download appropriate
.deb files, unpack them, put them on USB stick and give it to official
installer. It works, I tried it. I never needed unofficial thanks to that.

That being said, I don't have this WiFi module and I don't want to give
incorrect advice, I suggest go to this link below and read about
Broadcom install procedures:
https://wiki.debian.org/bcm43xx

--
With kindest regards, Piotr.

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
⠈⠳⣄



Re: Followup to my last...

2022-01-17 Thread Keith Bainbridge



On 18/1/22 18:29, R. Toby Richards wrote:
I'm installing Debian 11. The installer says that it is missing firmware 
files: b43/ucode11.fw, b43/ucode11.fw, b43-open/ucode11.fw and 
b43-open/ucode.fw. If you have such media available now, insert it, and 
continue.


I downloaded the dang unofficial DVD ISO that supposedly has non-free 
binaries, but the installer won't accept that media as having the 
Broadcom drivers that I need. Sneakernet doesn't work because every 
iteration of the ISO that I try has no working dpkg. I cannot dpkg the 
stuff I need for dpkg to work if dpkg is not working.


I appreciate your stance on non-free binaries, but at least throw me a 
bone on the unofficial ISO files.


--

_R. Toby Richards_




Good afternoon Toby

Just a quick response

Please advise the full name of your install .iso

And output of command
lspci

at least the network controllers

I've used b43 firmware in the past and it worked; but that macbook died 
about 5 years ago, so no recent knowledge

--
All the best

Keith Bainbridge

keithrbaugro...@gmail.com



Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-19 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom

Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:

Ron Johnson wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/18/07 09:59, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:

Ron Johnson wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/18/07 04:20, David Fox wrote:

Please give such files a .txt suffix so that Tbird knows what to do
with them.


I wish thunderbird and iceweasel are smart enough to just pretend the
file is text and display it. It is annoying to have to save a file and
open it in some text editor just to view its contents when there is no
reason a browser cannot just display it :(


MS Windows is (in this one instance...) polite enough to ask you
which app you'd like to open the file with.



If I remember correctly, the ancient netscape used to display anything 
that is thrown at at. You had to press shift while clicking on a link to 
be prompted to save it. Probably that was classified as a bug and 
fixed, but I really miss that feature. Many times, even if the mime 
type is explicitly specified, iceweasel throws up the save dialog for 
simple things like a python script, or some other code snippet, when all 
I want to do is have a look at it and be done. I hope someone comes up 
with an extension/plugin that provides this feature.




second that.

Hugo


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-18 Thread Raj Kiran Grandhi

Ron Johnson wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/18/07 04:20, David Fox wrote:

Please give such files a .txt suffix so that Tbird knows what to do
with them.



I wish thunderbird and iceweasel are smart enough to just pretend the 
file is text and display it. It is annoying to have to save a file and 
open it in some text editor just to view its contents when there is no 
reason a browser cannot just display it :(



--
Raj Kiran Grandhi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-18 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:29:51PM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
 Ron Johnson wrote:
 On 11/18/07 04:20, David Fox wrote:
 
 Please give such files a .txt suffix so that Tbird knows what to do
 with them.
 
 
 I wish thunderbird and iceweasel are smart enough to just pretend the 
 file is text and display it. It is annoying to have to save a file and 
 open it in some text editor just to view its contents when there is no 
 reason a browser cannot just display it :(

Yeah, well, mutt isn't either.  If I get an email that is just
attachments that mutt won't display, I delete it.  It may be annoying,
but the code of conduct says to send plain text only.

Doug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-18 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/18/07 09:59, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
 Ron Johnson wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 11/18/07 04:20, David Fox wrote:

 Please give such files a .txt suffix so that Tbird knows what to do
 with them.

 
 I wish thunderbird and iceweasel are smart enough to just pretend the
 file is text and display it. It is annoying to have to save a file and
 open it in some text editor just to view its contents when there is no
 reason a browser cannot just display it :(

MS Windows is (in this one instance...) polite enough to ask you
which app you'd like to open the file with.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHQD4BS9HxQb37XmcRAuEMAJ0T+43yaA2VBuO5nig9QaNAI8Ws+ACgsENt
jduuJ/OqVq2KAfw5CBbP5oI=
=557m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-18 Thread Raj Kiran Grandhi

Ron Johnson wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/18/07 09:59, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:

Ron Johnson wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/18/07 04:20, David Fox wrote:

Please give such files a .txt suffix so that Tbird knows what to do
with them.


I wish thunderbird and iceweasel are smart enough to just pretend the
file is text and display it. It is annoying to have to save a file and
open it in some text editor just to view its contents when there is no
reason a browser cannot just display it :(


MS Windows is (in this one instance...) polite enough to ask you
which app you'd like to open the file with.



If I remember correctly, the ancient netscape used to display anything 
that is thrown at at. You had to press shift while clicking on a link to 
be prompted to save it. Probably that was classified as a bug and 
fixed, but I really miss that feature. Many times, even if the mime 
type is explicitly specified, iceweasel throws up the save dialog for 
simple things like a python script, or some other code snippet, when all 
I want to do is have a look at it and be done. I hope someone comes up 
with an extension/plugin that provides this feature.


--
Raj Kiran Grandhi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-18 Thread David Fox
On 11/18/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yeah, well, mutt isn't either.  If I get an email that is just
 attachments that mutt won't display, I delete it.  It may be annoying,
 but the code of conduct says to send plain text only.

That's one thing I don't like about web-based mail. Even in mutt, it's
sufficient to read a file right into vi if you ant to attach a file
to a posting, since the posting lives on your hard drive. Or, in
sylpheed, just cut  paste.

 Doug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 07:51:19AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] was heard to say:
 On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:29:51PM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
  Ron Johnson wrote:
  On 11/18/07 04:20, David Fox wrote:
  
  Please give such files a .txt suffix so that Tbird knows what to do
  with them.
  
  
  I wish thunderbird and iceweasel are smart enough to just pretend the 
  file is text and display it. It is annoying to have to save a file and 
  open it in some text editor just to view its contents when there is no 
  reason a browser cannot just display it :(
 
 Yeah, well, mutt isn't either.  If I get an email that is just
 attachments that mutt won't display, I delete it.  It may be annoying,
 but the code of conduct says to send plain text only.

  Mutt showed his logs just fine for me.  (if it doesn't you can always
pipe the attachment to less)

  Daniel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-18 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:02:36AM -0800, David Fox wrote:
 On 11/18/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Yeah, well, mutt isn't either.  If I get an email that is just
  attachments that mutt won't display, I delete it.  It may be annoying,
  but the code of conduct says to send plain text only.
 
 That's one thing I don't like about web-based mail. Even in mutt, it's
 sufficient to read a file right into vi if you ant to attach a file
 to a posting, since the posting lives on your hard drive. Or, in
 sylpheed, just cut  paste.

If your web-based mail won't allow you to follow the code of conduct,
then don't use it.  

Doug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-18 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 07:51:19AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:29:51PM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
  Ron Johnson wrote:
  On 11/18/07 04:20, David Fox wrote:
  
  Please give such files a .txt suffix so that Tbird knows what to do
  with them.
  
  
  I wish thunderbird and iceweasel are smart enough to just pretend the 
  file is text and display it. It is annoying to have to save a file and 
  open it in some text editor just to view its contents when there is no 
  reason a browser cannot just display it :(
 
 Yeah, well, mutt isn't either.  If I get an email that is just
 attachments that mutt won't display, I delete it.  It may be annoying,
 but the code of conduct says to send plain text only.

If you press v and then Enter on the selected attachment it will be 
displayed as text.

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-18 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 07:32:02PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 07:51:19AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
  On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:29:51PM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
   Ron Johnson wrote:
   On 11/18/07 04:20, David Fox wrote:
   
   Please give such files a .txt suffix so that Tbird knows what to do
   with them.
   
   I wish thunderbird and iceweasel are smart enough to just pretend the 
   file is text and display it. It is annoying to have to save a file and 
   open it in some text editor just to view its contents when there is no 
   reason a browser cannot just display it :(
  
  Yeah, well, mutt isn't either.  If I get an email that is just
  attachments that mutt won't display, I delete it.  It may be annoying,
  but the code of conduct says to send plain text only.
 
 If you press v and then Enter on the selected attachment it will be 
 displayed as text.

I know that.  I can do that too to read html (get lynx).  However, there
was not cover text saying look at the (whatever) attached or
something.  It was just a series of attachments that didn't come up as
plain text.  How am I to differentiate this from all the spam on the
list without opening at least one attachment from every piece of junk?  

The code of conduct says to send as plain text and to avoid sending
large attachements.  

Doug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Followup to my last posting

2007-11-17 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/18/07 04:20, David Fox wrote:

Please give such files a .txt suffix so that Tbird knows what to do
with them.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHP8AIS9HxQb37XmcRAtlOAKC+qNEZuvpHdGF1yp9gb5HN6DZPQQCdEX/c
YQoeEnHe93cB/SXK1Q+J/EE=
=pcjN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]