Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread Phil Brutsche
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...

 Hi. Does anyone know of a good front end for email?
 
 I do not like elm, mutt or XEmacs.
 
 I am looking for something like MS Exchange with folder and such.

You mean something like Outlook?  I'm afraid that no such program exists
under Linux.  Yet.

In the meantime, there are a couple of fairly easy-to-use programs
available under X11:

 * KMail, which is part of KDE
 * Netscape Communicator

-- 
--
Phil Brutsche   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

There are two things that are infinite; Human stupidity and the
universe. And I'm not sure about the universe. - Albert Einstein


Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread Remco van de Meent
In lists.linux.debian.user, you wrote: 

 I am looking for something like MS Exchange with folder
 and such.

You could try xfmail, for example -- IIRC it supports folders.


Remco


Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread claw
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999 17:07:28 +0100 
Remco van de Meent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In lists.linux.debian.user, you wrote:
 I am looking for something like MS Exchange with folder and such.

 You could try xfmail, for example -- IIRC it supports folders.

Most if not all MUA (Mail User Agens) support folders.  Examples
enclude: exmh (wot I use), balsa, tkrat, mutt, elm, mutt, arrow,
NetscapeMail and many others.

-- 
J C Lawrence Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--(*)  Other: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--


Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread claw
On 27 Nov 1999 18:16:47 +0100 
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Has this already been ported to a better (and freer) toolkit than
 xforms, like GTK+ (or at least Qt)?  

XFMail is tightly married to XForms.  I would not expect this to
change.

-- 
J C Lawrence Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--(*)  Other: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--


Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread Phillip Deackes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 27 Nov 1999 18:16:47 +0100 
 Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Has this already been ported to a better (and freer) toolkit than
  xforms, like GTK+ (or at least Qt)?  
 
 XFMail is tightly married to XForms.  I would not expect this to
 change.

Darned ugly too. Enough to make you yearn for Windows!!

The mail client I use is the excellent (IMHO) Ishmail. Ishmail
(www.ishmail.com) was a commercial email app and is now free. The source
code is available too. I had hoped someone would compile it with glibc
2.1 and debianise it a bit, but my pleas on the net and on this list
have remained unanswered.

Iahmail is highly polished and is more like what you might expect from a
commercial Windows app. I have tried other clients, but keep on using
Ishmail.


--
Phillip Deackes
Debian Linux (Potato) 


Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread claw
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999 20:12:34 + (GMT) 
Phillip Deackes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 XFMail is tightly married to XForms.  I would not expect this to
 change.

 Darned ugly too. Enough to make you yearn for Windows!!

shrug This is a common disagreement for me.  I just don't care
what the thing looks like as long as it does what I need and
consumes minimal screen real estate.  Consuming minimal screen real
estate is critical and is what flunks out most tools -- espcially
those things which insist on having toolbars or putting bloody icons
about the place (I never ever want to see an icon on my desktop.
Period.).  XFMail fails both those criteria by handling MIME
obtusely (eg it doesn't display message/rfc822 inline, or handle
multipart/mixed digests worth a damn), and consumes great gobs of
screen real estate.

 The mail client I use is the excellent (IMHO) Ishmail. 

exmh here.  Its not cute, or is at least no more cute than Tk in
general (and of course there are several widget hacks for Tk), but
is endlessly extensible -- which is another primary requirement for
me.

-- 
J C Lawrence Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--(*)  Other: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--