Re: are aptitude and synaptic compatible?

2010-03-18 Thread Chris Davies
Martin adsrtg-ml...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
 I mean can I install/deinstall packages once with aptitude
 then with synaptic without worry that something will break?

Not if you use a preferences file with pinning. Aptitude honours
it. Synaptic ignores it.

Chris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hri977x21v@news.roaima.co.uk



Re: are aptitude and synaptic compatible?

2010-03-15 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-03-15 01:06 +0100, Omar Campagne wrote:

 On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:12:35PM +0200, Aioanei Rares wrote:
 Martin wrote:
 I mean can I install/deinstall packages once with aptitude
 then with synaptic without worry that something will break?
 They both use same database of installed packages, right?

 I guess the answer is 'yes' - I just want to be sure.
 Martin

 Nothing will break, but note that aptitude keeps a more severe tracking
 of what is installed, meaning that, over time, you will get more
 orphaned packages than what you'll get by using only aptitude.

This is wrong in Lenny and later.  The only difference is that aptitude
will by default remove orphaned packages automatically whereas apt-get
(and probably synaptic as well) will keep them and require you to run
»apt-get autoremove« once in a while.  Again, this is only the default
setting and can be changed.

 OTOH, use deborphan (orphanar - curses interface or gtkorphan) to keep
 an eye on those packages.

It is better to use aptitude (un)markauto or apt-mark (un)markauto
to let apt know about which packages you care about.  These days,
deborphan is (thankfully) pretty much obsolete.

Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zl2ac8s7@turtle.gmx.de



Re: are aptitude and synaptic compatible?

2010-03-14 Thread Omar Campagne
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:12:35PM +0200, Aioanei Rares wrote:
 Martin wrote:
 I mean can I install/deinstall packages once with aptitude
 then with synaptic without worry that something will break?
 They both use same database of installed packages, right?

 I guess the answer is 'yes' - I just want to be sure.
 Martin

Nothing will break, but note that aptitude keeps a more severe tracking
of what is installed, meaning that, over time, you will get more
orphaned packages than what you'll get by using only aptitude.

OTOH, use deborphan (orphanar - curses interface or gtkorphan) to keep
an eye on those packages.

Omar Campagne Polaino

vim-doc-es: http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/vim-doc-es


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100315000651.ga13...@gmail.com



are aptitude and synaptic compatible?

2010-03-13 Thread Martin
I mean can I install/deinstall packages once with aptitude
then with synaptic without worry that something will break?
They both use same database of installed packages, right?

I guess the answer is 'yes' - I just want to be sure.
Martin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100313131350.ga2...@alfa



Re: are aptitude and synaptic compatible?

2010-03-13 Thread Aioanei Rares

Martin wrote:

I mean can I install/deinstall packages once with aptitude
then with synaptic without worry that something will break?
They both use same database of installed packages, right?

I guess the answer is 'yes' - I just want to be sure.
Martin


  

yes.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9bab63.2040...@gmail.com



Re: mixing aptitude and synaptic

2006-05-22 Thread Black Dew

kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to mix 
apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and 
aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?


Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.


Both synaptic and aptitude are just front ends to apt, it shouldn't be a 
problem to use any combination of them



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: mixing aptitude and synaptic

2006-05-22 Thread Black Dew

kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to mix 
apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and 
aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?


Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.


Both synaptic and aptitude are just front ends to apt, it shouldn't be a 
problem to use any combination of them



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: mixing aptitude and synaptic

2006-05-22 Thread Chris Lale

Black Dew wrote:


kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:

Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to 
mix apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and 
aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?


Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.



Both synaptic and aptitude are just front ends to apt, it shouldn't be 
a problem to use any combination of them



I don't think that this is true. Aptitude is not a front end for 
apt-get. That said, I use both interchangeably with no problems.


There is one snag. Aptitude keeps a note of packages that have been 
installed manually (as opposed to being installed automatically as 
dependencies). The result is that it assumes that any packages installed 
using Synaptic were not manually installed. This means that Aptitude 
sometimes wants to remove a number of your packages because it assumes 
that they are no longer needed. The solution (thanks to Magnus Therning 
in a previous post) is to run


   # aptitude unmarkauto --schedule-only '~i'

before running Aptitude commands.

Hth,
Chris.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: mixing aptitude and synaptic

2006-05-22 Thread M-L
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:39, Chris Lale wrote this for perusal by us all:
--- Black Dew wrote:
---
---  kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
--- 
---  Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to
---  mix apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes
 and ---  aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?
--- 
---  Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.
--- 
--- 
---  Both synaptic and aptitude are just front ends to apt, it shouldn't
 be ---  a problem to use any combination of them
--- 
--- 
--- I don't think that this is true. Aptitude is not a front end for
--- apt-get. That said, I use both interchangeably with no problems.
---
--- There is one snag. Aptitude keeps a note of packages that have been
--- installed manually (as opposed to being installed automatically as
--- dependencies). The result is that it assumes that any packages
 installed --- using Synaptic were not manually installed. This means that
 Aptitude --- sometimes wants to remove a number of your packages because
 it assumes --- that they are no longer needed. The solution (thanks to
 Magnus Therning --- in a previous post) is to run
---
--- # aptitude unmarkauto --schedule-only '~i'
---
--- before running Aptitude commands.
---
--- Hth,
--- Chris.

I use apt-get and synaptic and find no problem whatsoever. But it will work as 
it seems aptitude does, if I want to mark smart updates. It will then attempt 
to remove programs to upgrade others. If that is not invoked, then all runs 
as it should.

Charlie
-- 
Registered Linux User:- 329524
+++
Religion is not to go to God by forsaking the world but to find Him in it. Our 
faith is to believe in our essential oneness with Him. God is in us and we 
in Him must be made the most fundamental faith of all religions. 
-- SOEN SHAKU

***
Brilliant Debian Sarge 3.1
___


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mixing aptitude and synaptic

2006-05-22 Thread Bill Wohler
OK, I have to jump in since there seems to be a lot of misinformation
going around.

Chris Lale [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 There is one snag. Aptitude keeps a note of packages that have been
 installed manually (as opposed to being installed automatically as
 dependencies). The result is that it assumes that any packages
 installed using Synaptic were not manually installed.
 Aptitude sometimes wants to remove a number of your packages because
 it assumes that they are no longer needed.

I think it is the other way round: that aptitude just remembers which
packages are automatically installed. You should therefore be able to
use synaptic or apt-get to install packages. aptitude won't remove
them. The only downside is that aptitude will not remove the
dependencies that these other packages have installed automatically.
See below.

I have a feeling that folks might have selected a new (or old) package
which caused dependency cascades to happen and blamed it on apt-get or
synaptic.

 The solution (thanks to
 Magnus Therning in a previous post) is to run

# aptitude unmarkauto --schedule-only '~i'

 before running Aptitude commands.

Wow, this pretty much just ruins one of the great features of
aptitude. After running this, aptitude will never remove dependencies
that are no longer needed.

What would be more useful is to run aptitude markauto on those
packages which apt-get and synaptic install automatically as
dependencies.

-- 
Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



mixing aptitude and synaptic

2006-05-21 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to mix apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.
thanksraju


aptitude and synaptic

2006-05-17 Thread Kenneth Jacker
The recent discussion about 'apt-get' and 'aptitude' was interesting
and useful (I've used 'aptitude' for years).  It appeared that the
consensus was not to mix the two.


What about 'aptitude' and 'synaptic'?

Is it safe to use one, and then the other ... i.e., mixed use?

Thanks for your ideas!
-- 
Prof Kenneth H Jacker   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Science Dept   www.cs.appstate.edu/~khj
Appalachian State Univ
Boone, NC  28608  USA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



aptitude and synaptic

2003-12-15 Thread M. Kirchhoff
Does Synaptic's ability to remove including any orphaned dependencies
do as good a job as the inate abilities of aptitude? 

I've recently abandoned apt in favor of aptitude for its ability to
track and automatically remove unneeded dependencies.  However, I really
like Synaptic, but want to be sure it can deal automatically with
dependencies as well.  

This is all under Sid, by the way.
--
me.kirchhoff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: aptitude, dselect, synaptic at the same time

2002-06-18 Thread Matthew Dalton
Petr Vanek wrote:
 
 On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 09:12:41AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
  If one sometimes uses aptitude sometimes uses synaptic sometimes uses
  dselect, and in each sometimes quits out after making his selections
  and then not following thru and installing the packages, can this lead
  to an utter state of confusion?
 
 my expirience is, that apt-get and dselect say something completly
 different. i have been using aptitude and apt-get only with no more
 problems. maybe may question would be - could i uninstall dselect - is
 that even possible without making problems in dpkg system?

I believe you can get apt-get to install dselect's selections with 
'apt-get dselect-upgrade'.

I've never used aptitude or synaptic, so I can't comment on those.

Matthew


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: aptitude, dselect, synaptic at the same time

2002-06-18 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 04:41:05AM +0200, Petr Vanek wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 09:12:41AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
  If one sometimes uses aptitude sometimes uses synaptic sometimes uses
  dselect, and in each sometimes quits out after making his selections
  and then not following thru and installing the packages, can this lead
  to an utter state of confusion?
 
 my expirience is, that apt-get and dselect say something completly
 different. i have been using aptitude and apt-get only with no more
 problems. maybe may question would be - could i uninstall dselect - is
 that even possible without making problems in dpkg system?

(apt-get and aptitudes) and dselect use different database.

just run dselect update before doing dselect select.  Then you
should get same result, I think.

Osamu
-- 
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +
 Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA
 See User's Guide: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/
 See Debian reference: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/
 Debian reference Project at: http://qref.sf.net

 I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: aptitude, dselect, synaptic at the same time

2002-06-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 04:41:05AM +0200, Petr Vanek wrote:
 could i uninstall dselect - is that even possible without making
 problems in dpkg system?

No, it's not possible yet. dselect will be split out into a separate
package for the release after woody, but dpkg will pre-depend on it to
ensure that upgrades work sensibly for people using dselect to perform
the upgrade. In the release after *that*, I believe it will be possible
to remove dselect.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



aptitude, dselect, synaptic at the same time

2002-06-17 Thread Dan Jacobson
If one sometimes uses aptitude sometimes uses synaptic sometimes uses
dselect, and in each sometimes quits out after making his selections
and then not following thru and installing the packages, can this lead
to an utter state of confusion?

If one is going to mix and match these must one remember to always do
the installs and deletes before trying another?
-- 
http://jidanni.org/ Taiwan(04)25854780


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: aptitude, dselect, synaptic at the same time

2002-06-17 Thread Petr Vanek
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 09:12:41AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
 If one sometimes uses aptitude sometimes uses synaptic sometimes uses
 dselect, and in each sometimes quits out after making his selections
 and then not following thru and installing the packages, can this lead
 to an utter state of confusion?

my expirience is, that apt-get and dselect say something completly
different. i have been using aptitude and apt-get only with no more
problems. maybe may question would be - could i uninstall dselect - is
that even possible without making problems in dpkg system?

-- 

bye

Vanous
-
Petr Vanek   . ./\.  
Debian GNU Linux .. _|\|  |/|_ ..
[EMAIL PROTECTED].. \/...
http://www.penguin.cz/~vanous... __ ...
Angus, Ontario, CA   .. / ...
-
Registered linux user #217487


pgpfSbCj4XW4K.pgp
Description: PGP signature