Re: enregistrer une page web avec w3m
Le 27/08/2018 à 04:18, Bernard Schoenacker a écrit : [...] > avec (e)links je peut enregistrer une page web > au format texte et je recherche à faire de même > avec w3m [...] d'après http://w3m.sourceforge.net/MANUAL : a ou d suivant que tu es en mode natif ou en mode émulation clavier Lynx
Re: enregistrer une page web avec w3m
- Mail original - > De: "Yves Rutschle" > À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org > Envoyé: Dimanche 26 Août 2018 22:00:21 > Objet: Re: enregistrer une page web avec w3m > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 07:52:19PM +0200, Bernard Schoenacker wrote: > > j'ai des sites web qui me bloquent l'accès avec elinks et > > je comptais employer w3m mais je n'ai pas trouvé les > > commandes pour le faire ... > > w3m -dump ou -dump_source peut-être? Sinon, la question > n'est pas assez précise... > > Mais pour enregistrer une page, le plus adapté est sans > doute wget ou curl. > > Y. bonjour, avec (e)links je peut enregistrer une page web au format texte et je recherche à faire de même avec w3m merci slt bernard
Re: enregistrer une page web avec w3m
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 07:52:19PM +0200, Bernard Schoenacker wrote: > j'ai des sites web qui me bloquent l'accès avec elinks et > je comptais employer w3m mais je n'ai pas trouvé les > commandes pour le faire ... w3m -dump ou -dump_source peut-être? Sinon, la question n'est pas assez précise... Mais pour enregistrer une page, le plus adapté est sans doute wget ou curl. Y.
enregistrer une page web avec w3m
bonjour, j'ai des sites web qui me bloquent l'accès avec elinks et je comptais employer w3m mais je n'ai pas trouvé les commandes pour le faire ... quels sont les autres butineurs de disponible en mode texte qui laissent passer le javascript merci slt bernard
Re: Debian 9 stretch screen flicker on w3m and command line applications
I want to share my experiences - I have not searched for an issue. Same issue here - but not limited to terminal - occurs also in Graphical mode (KDE). When the screen flickers it flickers both in GUI and terminal. The flickering is fast moving left and right. Sometimes the top ~1/5 of the display is displayed in the bottom. I am not sure if the flickering is triggered by toggling windows (Alt-TAB) or it just occurs randomly. Closing the lid (suspend) and opening the lid again makes the machine usable again. I am using kernel 4.9.0-4 on a Lenovo E550: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation HD Graphics 5500 (rev 09) CPU: Intel Core i5-5200U I have not tried using reverting to kernel 4.8.0-3 but the timing of the issue matches well. Br, Benny
Re: Debian 9 stretch screen flicker on w3m and command line applications
Ok, thanks for the info. On Jan 2, 2018 2:32 AM, "Tino Calancha"wrote: > > > >Instead the following fix works: > >Create a file: > >/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-fix-screen-flickering.conf > > >with content: > >--8<-cut here---start-- > --->8--- > >Section "Device" > > Identifier "Intel Graphics" > > Driver "intel" > > Option "AccelMethod" "uxa" > >EndSection > >--8<-cut here---end > --->8--- > > Unfortunately the fix above causes another issue: > switching between applications became slow with Xorg using > 70 % of the > CPU. > > I see this issue with kernel 4.9.0-4. > Smilar thing has been reported: > As mentioned elsewhere kernel 4.9.0-3 doesn't show this problem; then, a > temporary > workaround is boot the system with a previous kernel <= 4.9.0-3 > Best regards, > Tino > From: Tino Calancha > Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:31:46 +0900 > Message-ID: <87h8s4sga5@gmail.com> >
Re: Debian 9 stretch screen flicker on w3m and command line applications
>Instead the following fix works: >Create a file: >/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-fix-screen-flickering.conf >with content: >--8<-cut here---start->8--- >Section "Device" > Identifier "Intel Graphics" > Driver "intel" > Option "AccelMethod" "uxa" >EndSection >--8<-cut here---end--->8--- Unfortunately the fix above causes another issue: switching between applications became slow with Xorg using > 70 % of the CPU. I see this issue with kernel 4.9.0-4. Smilar thing has been reported: As mentioned elsewhere kernel 4.9.0-3 doesn't show this problem; then, a temporary workaround is boot the system with a previous kernel <= 4.9.0-3 Best regards, Tino From: Tino CalanchaDate: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:31:46 +0900 Message-ID: <87h8s4sga5@gmail.com>
Re: Debian 9 stretch screen flicker on w3m and command line applications
FWIW I have been suffering screenn flickering in Debian 9 since 1 or 2 weeks ago. The flickering is _very_ serious: it makes my box almost unusable. Booting with kernel option: i915.enable_rc6=0 significantly reduces the problem but it doesn't completely fix it. Instead the following fix works: Create a file: /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-fix-screen-flickering.conf with content: --8<-cut here---start->8--- Section "Device" Identifier "Intel Graphics" Driver "intel" Option "AccelMethod" "uxa" EndSection --8<-cut here---end--->8--- Best regards, Tino
Re: Debian 9 stretch screen flicker on w3m and command line applications
We had similar issues (flickering and continous moving of the screen horizontally) for 2 of our dell latitude 3460 running on Debian 9.3 configured with i915 driver. Observed that it was mostly on terminal with some key combinations like CTRL + C but happened randomly. We choose advance option to boot in with old kernel 4.9.0.3 and issue seems resolved. Likely problem with kernel 4.9.0.4 Let us know if you need more info in order to fix issue. Regards, Aslam Sayyed
Re: Debian 9 stretch screen flicker on w3m and command line applications
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017, davidson wrote: On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, josh cha wrote: How do i fix screen flickering while scrolling and pressing down buttion? While im on my command-line applications like w3m? I notice screen flickering while scrolling on down button. its a problem since stretch release. Does this happen all the time, or only occasionally? I ask this question because I have noticed a similar issue (a terminal flickering phenomenon that I first noticed after upgrading to stretch), but it only occurs after I've resized a terminal (xterm) while running a certain application (lynx) in the foreground. (I don't use w3m.) My workaround is to put the offending application (lynx in my case) in the background before resizing its terminal, and not to bring it back into the foreground without first restoring the terminal to its original size. Or, when using the affected application within a terminal multiplexer like GNU screen, there are other workarounds available. (Namely, to keep windows running applications susceptible to flickering-on-resize hidden, until the terminal is restored to its original size.) Basically, if OP's problem is the same problem I have noticed, the key to avoiding it seems to be this: Never make the affected application adapt itself to a resized terminal.
Re: Debian 9 stretch screen flicker on w3m and command line applications
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, josh cha wrote: How do i fix screen flickering while scrolling and pressing down buttion? While im on my command-line applications like w3m? I notice screen flickering while scrolling on down button. its a problem since stretch release. Does this happen all the time, or only occasionally? My laptop Levono thinkpad T510 Core i5 450m 4gb 240gb ssd
Debian 9 stretch screen flicker on w3m and command line applications
How do i fix screen flickering while scrolling and pressing down buttion? While im on my command-line applications like w3m? I notice screen flickering while scrolling on down button. its a problem since stretch release. My laptop Levono thinkpad T510 Core i5 450m 4gb 240gb ssd
Re: w3m stack smashing?
Reco <recovery...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi. > > On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 19:22:02 -0600 > Joe Pfeiffer <pfeif...@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote: > >> Recently, I've been getting email messages that look like this: >> >> *** stack smashing detected ***: /usr/bin/w3m terminated > > This is recently fixed bug #842623 in w3m. > > >> This is with w3m 0.5.3-31, which appears to be the most current version >> in Debian testing. > > Try 0.5.3-32 from the unstable. Thanks -- upgrading now.
Re: w3m stack smashing?
Hi. On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 19:22:02 -0600 Joe Pfeiffer <pfeif...@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote: > Recently, I've been getting email messages that look like this: > > *** stack smashing detected ***: /usr/bin/w3m terminated > === Backtrace: = > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x70bcb)[0x7f03ee523bcb] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7f03ee5ac0e7] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x0)[0x7f03ee5ac0b0] > /usr/bin/w3m(+0x54574)[0x560e882b2574] > /usr/bin/w3m(+0x55974)[0x560e882b3974] > /usr/bin/w3m(+0x3dd18)[0x560e8829bd18] > /usr/bin/w3m(+0x3ec68)[0x560e8829cc68] > /usr/bin/w3m(+0x3f076)[0x560e8829d076] > /usr/bin/w3m(+0x42416)[0x560e882a0416] > /usr/bin/w3m(+0x20e26)[0x560e8827ee26] > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf1)[0x7f03ee4d32b1] > /usr/bin/w3m(+0x2192a)[0x560e8827f92a] > === Memory map: > 560e8825e000-560e8830f000 r-xp 09:01 5511742 > /usr/bin/w3m > (lots more core dump lines deleted) > > Am I seeing messages that are being sent from a buggy sender, or is my > local /usr/bin/w3m blowing up and spewing the detritus into the mail > message? This is recently fixed bug #842623 in w3m. > This is with w3m 0.5.3-31, which appears to be the most current version > in Debian testing. Try 0.5.3-32 from the unstable. Reco
w3m stack smashing?
Recently, I've been getting email messages that look like this: *** stack smashing detected ***: /usr/bin/w3m terminated === Backtrace: = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x70bcb)[0x7f03ee523bcb] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7f03ee5ac0e7] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x0)[0x7f03ee5ac0b0] /usr/bin/w3m(+0x54574)[0x560e882b2574] /usr/bin/w3m(+0x55974)[0x560e882b3974] /usr/bin/w3m(+0x3dd18)[0x560e8829bd18] /usr/bin/w3m(+0x3ec68)[0x560e8829cc68] /usr/bin/w3m(+0x3f076)[0x560e8829d076] /usr/bin/w3m(+0x42416)[0x560e882a0416] /usr/bin/w3m(+0x20e26)[0x560e8827ee26] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf1)[0x7f03ee4d32b1] /usr/bin/w3m(+0x2192a)[0x560e8827f92a] === Memory map: 560e8825e000-560e8830f000 r-xp 09:01 5511742 /usr/bin/w3m (lots more core dump lines deleted) Am I seeing messages that are being sent from a buggy sender, or is my local /usr/bin/w3m blowing up and spewing the detritus into the mail message? This is with w3m 0.5.3-31, which appears to be the most current version in Debian testing.
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On Friday 07 October 2016 19:00:12 Tony Baldwin wrote: > I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media > consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. > Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm > getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", It works fine here. Chrome 54 on Jessie. Both fully updated. Lisi
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On Sunday 09 October 2016 12:28:03 Tony Baldwin wrote: > I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that for the US > stat of Minnesota). Except that it is Mongolia. Country TLDs have to be unique. Lisi
Re: Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.)
Hi Andy, Thanks very much! It looks like quite a comprehensive answer (including links) that I'll surely have to read more than once to absorb. (At that point, I'll ask more questions if I feel the need.) regards, Randy Kramer On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:18:38 PM Andy Smith wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:23:45PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a > > lot?) OT, > > In that case it would be good to change the subject of the email. > I've done so here. > > > but I am curious about how old inet4 (right term?) and the new > > inet6 addresses interact. Other good stuff elided.
Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.)
Hi rhkramer, On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:23:45PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a lot?) > OT, In that case it would be good to change the subject of the email. I've done so here. > but I am curious about how old inet4 (right term?) and the new > inet6 addresses interact. As the address family for IPv4 is "inet" (vs "inet6"), you could say "inet", but then it may not be so obvious that you were intending to make a distinction between IPv4 and IPv6. So, perhaps "inet4" is not so bad, or IPv4. Some go as far as to say "legacy". :) > When I do ifconfig, I see that eth0 has both a 32 bit (e.g., 192.168.1.19) > and > an inet6 address assigned. On Linux, it would be best to get used to using the "ip" command rather than "ifconfig". Issuing an "ip address" command will get you all the configured addresses of the various families. > Can anybody point me to a fairly short document that explains things like > which gets used under what circumstances If we restrict the domain of this question to source address selection then reading around from this point may help: http://linux-ip.net/html/routing-saddr-selection.html > does one have precedence over the other, Clearly if there is just one inet address and one inet6 address, then which will be chosen depends on which family the destination address comes from. i.e., if the destination is an inet6 address then the source address will have to be an inet6 address as well, otherwise no communication will be possible¹. If the destination address has been directly specified then that's simple enough to predict. Usually though, we are just dealing with host names that we wish to communicate with. A host name is going to be presented to the system's hostname resolution system, which may return a result from /etc/hosts or some other database. More usually though it's going to go out to DNS. The DNS may contain both A (IPv4) and (IPv6) addresses with no regard as to whether the client actually has a source address of the matching family. That is, if you had a host with only inet6 addresses and you did a DNS query, you would still receive A records as answers. If amongst the answers there were no records then you'd have no way to communicate with the destination when the application tried to do that. It's the getaddrinfo() function of GNU libc that decides which destination address to select for use. You can find more details about that with "man getaddrinfo". By default, if there are both inet and inet6 family addresses to choose from, getaddrinfo will choose the inet6 one. So, if your host has at least one configured global inet6 address then your applications will tend to try to connect to inet6 destination addresses, where available. You can configure getaddrinfo's address selection in /etc/gai.conf. A very common desire is to prefer inet addresses over inet6 ones, and so on Debian the configuration required to do that is shown in /etc/gai.conf commented out. An application can be told to use a specific source address, but it is more common for applications to be allowed to use any address. In that case for inet it will generally be a reasonably simple case of using the routing table to determine which source address is "closest" to the destination. For example, suppose you have an interface that has the addresses 192.168.1.1/24 and 192.168.1.175/25 on it. When attempting to communicate with 192.168.1.180 the routing table will show that this is in the same network as 192.168.1.175/25 and that that is the most specific address. When it comes to inet6 it can get a bit more complicated, especially as it is much more common to have several inet6 addresses, and you've got whole new concepts like privacy addresses and deprecated addresses. But, it's all covered by RFC 6724, and this may help as a summary: http://biplane.com.au/blog/?p=22 > do they both use DNS, As hopefully made clear by the above, it is not the addresses on your system which "use DNS". It's more like your system uses DNS, and the DNS may contain both inet and inet6 addresses, thus your system decides which to communicate with based on which families of address you have. > and similar things which might let me make sense of the situation? Hopefully that helped. It's quite a large topic, so some reading will be required in many places to fully understand it. Cheers, Andy ¹ This ignores the various translation mechanisms that may in place to allow IPv4 networks and IPv6 networks to inter-operate. These can involve various kinds of NAT and DNS rewriting. Look into things like "NAT64" and "DNS64" for more information about these. -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a lot?) OT, but I am curious about how old inet4 (right term?) and the new inet6 addresses interact. When I do ifconfig, I see that eth0 has both a 32 bit (e.g., 192.168.1.19) and an inet6 address assigned. Can anybody point me to a fairly short document that explains things like which gets used under what circumstances, does one have precedence over the other, do they both use DNS, and similar things which might let me make sense of the situation? On Sunday, October 09, 2016 03:02:25 PM Tony Baldwin wrote: > On 10/09/2016 11:54 AM, claude juif wrote: > > Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By > > the way, how did you install them ? >
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/09/2016 11:54 AM, claude juif wrote: Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By the way, how did you install them ? I WAS logged into my google account when I had the problem, in fact, but eventually determined that when I logged out, I could load the proper page for the url, oddly. I installed chromium with aptitude, google-chrome-stable by downloading google's .deb pkg and doing sudo dpkg -i $said-google-pkg.deb To resume : On your debian computer, only for this website, you get redirect to ads only with chrome/chromium ? That is correct, Iceweasel, w3m, lynx and e-links all load the proper page/site. Chrome and dolphin on my android phone do fine, as well, but apparently chrome on iOS (what my brother was using when he found the problem), does not. I would try these : purge chromium and chrome. Install chromium and go to your website. (do not log in before). The only things i can think of is broken extension. I've never see this happening, it's really strange. If that happens on windows i would have say, search for malware and delete them. 2016-10-09 15:00 GMT+02:00 Tony Baldwin <tonybald...@gmx.com <mailto:tonybald...@gmx.com>>: On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote: On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote: But we're getting a bit off-topic :-) Richard Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity. Thanks, Tony -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
Richard Hectorwrites: > > It appears that Montenegro only came into existence (most recently) in > 2006 - it was part of Yugoslavia, then 'Serbia and Montenegro'. So all > the 'good' codes were presumably taken. I'd imagine .me would, like .tv (Tuvalo) be one that a small country could use to bolster their income quite a bit... > I'm looking here: > http://www.domainsherpa.com/country-code-top-level-domains/ > > But we're getting a bit off-topic :-) > > Richard
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By the way, how did you install them ? To resume : On your debian computer, only for this website, you get redirect to ads only with chrome/chromium ? I would try these : purge chromium and chrome. Install chromium and go to your website. (do not log in before). The only things i can think of is broken extension. I've never see this happening, it's really strange. If that happens on windows i would have say, search for malware and delete them. 2016-10-09 15:00 GMT+02:00 Tony Baldwin: > > > On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote: > >> On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote: >> > > >> But we're getting a bit off-topic :-) >> >> Richard >> >> > Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity. > Thanks, > > Tony > -- > http://tonybaldwin.me > all tony, all the time > >
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote: On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote: But we're getting a bit off-topic :-) Richard Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity. Thanks, Tony -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > > On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote: >> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: >>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the >>> State of Maine. >> >> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) >> >> Richard >> > > Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all the Ms I > could think of were thins like Maroc, Moçambique, Macao, and the > like, where .ma, .mc, .mo, or some such think would make more > sense. I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that > for the US stat of Minnesota). That's Mongolia :-) It appears that Montenegro only came into existence (most recently) in 2006 - it was part of Yugoslavia, then 'Serbia and Montenegro'. So all the 'good' codes were presumably taken. I'm looking here: http://www.domainsherpa.com/country-code-top-level-domains/ But we're getting a bit off-topic :-) Richard
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/09/2016 02:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > > On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote: >> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: >>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of >>> Maine. >> >> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) >> >> Richard >> > > Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all the Ms I could > think of were thins like Maroc, Moçambique, Macao, and the like, where > .ma, .mc, .mo, or some such think would make more sense. > I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that for the US > stat of Minnesota). > Tony > The complete list is all in ISO-3166. It has two-letter codes as well as three-letter codes. ISO 639, in contrast, covers languages. I'd seen some sites mix them up. Regards, Lars
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote: On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of Maine. Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) Richard Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all the Ms I could think of were thins like Maroc, Moçambique, Macao, and the like, where .ma, .mc, .mo, or some such think would make more sense. I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that for the US stat of Minnesota). Tony -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: > What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of > Maine. Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) Richard
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/09/2016 07:11 AM, Richard Hector wrote: On 08/10/16 07:00, Tony Baldwin wrote: I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, This is probably a long shot ... is it a recent chrome/chromium? It seems to work fine for me in jessie. Just wondering if it sees a url that doesn't start with www, and ends with a slightly unusual '.me', and tries to 'autocorrect'. But .me is a country code TLD, not one of the new ones as I first thought, so it shouldn't be that. my chromium is Version 53.0.2785.113 Built on 8.5, running on Debian 8.5 (64-bit) and my chrome is google's latest stable install within this past week, two weeks at most . Version53.02785.143 (64-bit) What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of Maine. Tony -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 08/10/16 07:00, Tony Baldwin wrote: > I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media > consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. > Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm > getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", > If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, This is probably a long shot ... is it a recent chrome/chromium? It seems to work fine for me in jessie. Just wondering if it sees a url that doesn't start with www, and ends with a slightly unusual '.me', and tries to 'autocorrect'. But .me is a country code TLD, not one of the new ones as I first thought, so it shouldn't be that. Richard
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:35:21AM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote: [...] > >Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press > >the F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the > >url in your address bar. > >The network panel should show you what happens > > That doesn't seem to tell me anything traceroute doesn't, except > trqacerout doesn't get redirect to a Yahoo! search like chrome does, > but nothing I see there seems ot clarify WHY or HOW it's getting > redirected, it's just showing me that it IS being led though some > circolocuitous route to where it should not. A shot in the dark, but worth a try anyway: IPV4 vs IPV6? But I'd rather suspect Chrome doing something weird to the URL before resolving (or -- who knows! having its own built-in resolver). Perhaps looking at the traffic with tcpdump/wireshark can give you an idea. Regards - -- tomás -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlf5NeoACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZ+PQCeOsGFniEXtN/uNxh7xpHmc5jg SG0AmgMz751oR58+BwBJEKN5RP60UsGK =NsR2 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/08/2016 11:28 AM, claude juif wrote: 2016-10-08 3:53 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinling...@gmx.com <mailto:baldwinling...@gmx.com>>: On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, david...@freevolt.org <mailto:david...@freevolt.org> wrote: On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything untoward or fishy. The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? This problem sounds bizarre to me. One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com <http://gmx.com>) will point urls in email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider can log what you read). But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking on a link in an e-mail. Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again. so yeah, definitely something very odd going on. For example, a link labeled http://playomatic.myownsite.me <http://playomatic.myownsite.me> will point to https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me <https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/%5BSome-Alpha-Numeric-Code%5D/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me> If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. A shot in the dark, for what its worth. As soon as I type in the url, it goes to http://bridge.sf.admarketplace.net/bounce?click_id=1475940640200100010_width=1680_height=1050_width=624_height=860_top=5_left=33_iframe=0 whereas traceroute shows it going to my modem-> a local hub-> Comcast's DNS server in Boston, then to New York, then jumping to Frankfurt -> Munich, then the server I rent from Contabo which is in Munich, afaik. Thanks, Tony -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/08/2016 11:28 AM, claude juif wrote: 2016-10-08 3:53 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinling...@gmx.com <mailto:baldwinling...@gmx.com>>: On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, david...@freevolt.org <mailto:david...@freevolt.org> wrote: On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything untoward or fishy. The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? This problem sounds bizarre to me. One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com <http://gmx.com>) will point urls in email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider can log what you read). But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking on a link in an e-mail. Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again. so yeah, definitely something very odd going on. For example, a link labeled http://playomatic.myownsite.me <http://playomatic.myownsite.me> will point to https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me <https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/%5BSome-Alpha-Numeric-Code%5D/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me> If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. A shot in the dark, for what its worth. Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press the F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the url in your address bar. The network panel should show you what happens That doesn't seem to tell me anything traceroute doesn't, except trqacerout doesn't get redirect to a Yahoo! search like chrome does, but nothing I see there seems ot clarify WHY or HOW it's getting redirected, it's just showing me that it IS being led though some circolocuitous route to where it should not. -- http://www.baldwinlinguas.com translations, localization, multilingual web development EN, ES, FR, PT -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
2016-10-08 3:53 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinling...@gmx.com>: > > > On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, david...@freevolt.org wrote: > >> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: >> >> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media >>> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. >>> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm >>> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", >>> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, >>> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing >>> has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder >>> or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate >>> anything untoward or fishy. >>> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. >>> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. >>> >>> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some >>> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I >>> can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? >>> >> >> This problem sounds bizarre to me. >> >> One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that >> some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in >> email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider >> can log what you read). >> > > But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking on a > link in an e-mail. > Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again. so > yeah, definitely something very odd going on. > >> >> For example, a link labeled >> >> http://playomatic.myownsite.me >> >> will point to >> >> https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code] >> /dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me >> <https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/%5BSome-Alpha-Numeric-Code%5D/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me> >> >> >> If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of >> yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected >> behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. >> >> A shot in the dark, for what its worth. >> > Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press the F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the url in your address bar. The network panel should show you what happens > >> > -- > http://www.baldwinlinguas.com > translations, localization, > multilingual web development > EN, ES, FR, PT > >
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, david...@freevolt.org wrote: On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything untoward or fishy. The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? This problem sounds bizarre to me. One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider can log what you read). But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking on a link in an e-mail. Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again. so yeah, definitely something very odd going on. For example, a link labeled http://playomatic.myownsite.me will point to https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. A shot in the dark, for what its worth. -- http://www.baldwinlinguas.com translations, localization, multilingual web development EN, ES, FR, PT
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, david...@freevolt.org wrote: On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything untoward or fishy. The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? This problem sounds bizarre to me. One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider can log what you read). For example, a link labeled http://playomatic.myownsite.me will point to https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. A shot in the dark, for what its worth. My point here, which I may not have made clear, is that when you test the site in each browser, make sure you are really requesting http://playomatic.myownsite.me, not the redirect some email provider may have replaced it with.
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything untoward or fishy. The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? This problem sounds bizarre to me. One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider can log what you read). For example, a link labeled http://playomatic.myownsite.me will point to https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. A shot in the dark, for what its worth.
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
On 10/07/2016 02:32 PM, claude juif wrote: 2016-10-07 20:04 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinling...@gmx.com <mailto:baldwinling...@gmx.com>>: I can now also verify that the page loads fine n Dolphin browser on my android device. On 10/07/2016 02:00 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote: I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything untoward or fishy. The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. Hi, it works well in my Chrome Browser. May be you have some proxy between, or a misconfigured /etc/hosts entry. Did you try to load it with all plugins disabled ? Thanks, I use no proxy/ies, neither at home, nor on the remote server. My brother, who brought the matter to my attention was also using chrome . disabling my extensions doesn't seem to make any difference. There appears no mention of the url in any of my hosts files (neither at home, nor on the server), nor anything that would redirect the IP address, since I can load other sites on the same server (and the myownsite.me domain) without troubles. What else can I do? How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? tia tony -- http://www.baldwinlinguas.com translations, localization, multilingual web development EN, ES, FR, PT -- http://www.baldwinlinguas.com translations, localization, multilingual web development EN, ES, FR, PT
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
2016-10-07 20:04 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinling...@gmx.com>: > I can now also verify that the page loads fine n Dolphin browser on my > android device. > > On 10/07/2016 02:00 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote: > >> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media >> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. >> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm >> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", >> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, >> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing >> has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder >> or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate >> anything untoward or fishy. >> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. >> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. >> > Hi, it works well in my Chrome Browser. May be you have some proxy between, or a misconfigured /etc/hosts entry. Did you try to load it with all plugins disabled ? >> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some >> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I >> can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? >> >> tia >> tony >> >> > -- > http://www.baldwinlinguas.com > translations, localization, > multilingual web development > EN, ES, FR, PT > >
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
I can now also verify that the page loads fine n Dolphin browser on my android device. On 10/07/2016 02:00 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote: I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything untoward or fishy. The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? tia tony -- http://www.baldwinlinguas.com translations, localization, multilingual web development EN, ES, FR, PT
url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything untoward or fishy. The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? tia tony -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
Re: mutt, w3m and firefox
On 9 June 2016 at 19:27, Morten Bo Johansenwrote: > On 2016-06-08 Johann Spies wrote: > > > I use the following in ~/.mailcap: > > text/html; chromium %s; > text/html; /usr/bin/elinks -force-html -dump %s; copiousoutput > > and in ~/.muttrc: > > bind attachview-mailcap > alternative_order text/plain text/html > unauto_view * > auto_view text/html Thanks Morten, The .muttrc-part did it for me. Very usefull indeed. Regards Johann.
Re: mutt, w3m and firefox
On 2016-06-08 Johann Spies wrote: > Until a few weeks ago, I could open firefox from mutt by 'v' and then > select the html-part of the email and press enter. > > Now firefox does not but w3m handles everything - which is not preferred > when some links are important. I use the following in ~/.mailcap: text/html; chromium %s; text/html; /usr/bin/elinks -force-html -dump %s; copiousoutput and in ~/.muttrc: bind attachview-mailcap alternative_order text/plain text/html unauto_view * auto_view text/html This ensures that when I open a multipart/alternative message, the text part will be shown instead of the html part. In pure html messages, they will be opened from the mailcap line with the copiousoutput directive in it, which must be the last of the text/html mailcap entries. When you hit 'v' to specifically choose an html part from the attachment menu, it will be opened in chromium instead. Morten
mutt, w3m and firefox
Until a few weeks ago, I could open firefox from mutt by 'v' and then select the html-part of the email and press enter. Now firefox does not but w3m handles everything - which is not preferred when some links are important. I have in my .mailcap: #text/html; firefox -new-tab %s & sleep 5; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput text/html; firefox -new-tab %s & sleep 5; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.html; text/html; w3m -T text/html -dump %s; copiousoutput When the first of the three lines is uncommented, every time I open an email containing html it is opened in firefox - which is also not what I want. Also, when I select a bunch of messages to forward or to do something with, every single one of them gets opened in firefox. How can I get back the previous behaviour. Regards Johann -- Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself, my lips will praise you. (Psalm 63:3)
w3m-img — ho w to switch between graphic and non-graphic mode?
Hello. w3m-img adds the capability of viewing inline images with the framebuffer to w3m. Is there any key combo or command line option to switch between image and non-image mode? w3m with w3m-img is working, but i didn't find out yet how to switch back to text-only mode without uninstalling w3m-img. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Mutt, w3m et encodage de caract ères
Bonjour à tous, J'utilise w3m pour visualiser les mails en html depuis Mutt mais je bute sur un problème : w3m gère assez mal les accents. Je ne dis pas qu'il ne les reconnaît puisque, lorsque la page est chargée, il les affiche correctement. Mais dès que je me déplace sur la page, les accents disparaissent et sont remplacés par un esapce. J'ai modifié le fichier /etc/w3m/config : display_charset US-ASCII system_charset US-ASCII En display_charset UTF-8 system_charset UTF-8 Rien. Une idée ? @+ Christophe -- Christophe Gallaire Attention ! Taille des mails entrants limitée à 2Mo ! N'envoyez, s'il vous plaît, que des pièces jointes en formats ouverts. Carnet de route : http://www.road2mayotte.org Linux On The Root : http://ubunteros.tuxfamily.org/ Les clèbs [mutts] n'ont pas de punaises [bugs] mais des puces ! -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/DebFrFrenchLists Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't access e-mail with w3m
On 2008-10-11 12:52 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote: Another question: isn't there in Debian an emacs-w3m package? There are even two of them, called w3m-el and w3m-el-snapshot. However, you cannot install them concurrently, so you must which on to use. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't access e-mail with w3m
I can't access my e-mail box when navigating with w3m: the following messages are appear: unable to get local issue certificate: accept? (y/n) accept unsecure SSL session: unverified: unable to get local issuer certificate . Please, how to work this out? Another question: isn't there in Debian an emacs-w3m package? Thanks for any help Rodolfo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mutt, html et w3m
Bonjour, Afin de lire les mails que je reçois en HTML sous mutt j'utilise w3m. Le problème : Comment répondre « simplement » soit en HTML soit en txt en reprenant le texte du correspondant. Idéalement est-il possible avec un texte en HTML de taper « r » et d'avoir le texte du mail auquel je répond inclus dans le nouveau mail ? -- Frédéric Zulian f1sxo http://www.zulian.com/ -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mutt, html et w3m
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:17:48PM +0200, Frédéric ZULIAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 24 lines which said: Le problème : Comment répondre « simplement » soit en HTML soit en txt en reprenant le texte du correspondant. Dans ~/.mailcap : text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -dump -force_html '%s'; copiousoutput; description=HTML Text; nametemplate=%s.html (En plus de la ligne sur w3m.) Idéalement est-il possible avec un texte en HTML de taper « r » et d'avoir le texte du mail auquel je répond inclus dans le nouveau mail ? Oui, cf ci-dessus. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: w3m et les pages francaises
* Eric Reinbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-07 06:27] : Bonjour tatousse, Je sais que ça n'a rien à voir avec Debian... w3m et les pages en français, sous Debian vous devez savoir comment on fait pour avoir ça? (la page d'accueil de Debian...) Le plus simple est ... de suivre les indications fournies sur les pages Debian : http://www.debian.org/intro/cn. À noter que la section n'était pas Other Behavior comme indiqué, mais Network Settings et l'option était Accept-language header (et non Accept-language). Fred -- Comment poser les questions de manière intelligente ? http://www.gnurou.org/documents/smart-questions-fr.html Comment signaler efficacement un bug ? http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs-fr.html -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: w3m et les pages francaises
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:05:22AM +0200, Frédéric Bothamy wrote: * Eric Reinbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-07 06:27] : Bonjour tatousse, Je sais que ça n'a rien à voir avec Debian... w3m et les pages en français, sous Debian vous devez savoir comment on fait pour avoir ça? (la page d'accueil de Debian...) Le plus simple est ... de suivre les indications fournies sur les pages Debian : http://www.debian.org/intro/cn. À noter que la section n'était pas Other Behavior comme indiqué, mais Network Settings et l'option était Accept-language header (et non Accept-language). Ok, super Maintenant il y a un autre probleme, qui existait deja avant. w3m, contrairement a w3mmee, m'affiche des '*' et '-' en vert tout le long de la page (www.pcflank.com par exemple). Ca est tres desagreable. Seulement, dans w3mmee, y a pas l'option Accept-language ... Quelle est la meilleur solution: w3mmee en francais ou w3m sans les caracteres parasites? Merci Eric -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: w3m et les pages francaises
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:32:29PM +0200, Eric Reinbold wrote: w3m, contrairement a w3mmee, m'affiche des '*' et '-' en vert tout le long de la page Alors, pour ceux que ca interresse. J'ai vu que dans les options il y a les couleurs, alors j'ai mis black à la de green et ca le fait. Ave -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w3m et les pages francaises
Bonjour tatousse, Je sais que ça n'a rien à voir avec Debian... w3m et les pages en français, sous Debian vous devez savoir comment on fait pour avoir ça? (la page d'accueil de Debian...) Il y a bien cette option: follow_locale=bool mais qui se sert de LC_CTYPE. LC_CTYPE (je sais pas ce que c'est) j'ai pas. Il n'y a pas une option du genre locale=fr? Merci pour vos réponses. Eric -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: w3m Alternative
Klaus Schuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: elinks habe ich auch gerade gefunden. Ein seltsames Teil. Die Bedienung ist ersteinmal stark Gewöhnungsbedürftig. Ich fand w3m schlimmer :) Ich finde links2 ganz gut. Ist in sarge drin. Kann Bilder und in beschränkten Umfang JavaScript. -- MFG, Johannes http://home.arcor.de/jstarosta -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
w3m Alternative
Hi, gibt es einen Alternativen Konsolen Browser zu w3m der Frames kann. Viele Grüsse Klaus -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: w3m Alternative
On Monday 29 August 2005 11:32, Klaus Schuehler wrote: gibt es einen Alternativen Konsolen Browser zu w3m der Frames kann. ELinks (http://elinks.or.cz/). Gruss, Jens -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: w3m Alternative
On Monday 29 August 2005 11:32, Klaus Schuehler wrote: gibt es einen Alternativen Konsolen Browser zu w3m der Frames kann. ELinks (http://elinks.or.cz/). Gruss, Jens Hi, elinks habe ich auch gerade gefunden. Ein seltsames Teil. Die Bedienung ist ersteinmal stark Gewöhnungsbedürftig. Gruss Klaus -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
w3m e links nao navegam
E ai lista Formatei um HD e instalei o debian testing netinst peladasso instalei o w3m e da a mensagem Opening sockets e nao navega... A rede esta ok e puxa arquivos do ftp, tb pingo sites http e da retorno, o q pode ser isso? Falow -- - O linux eh um sistema operacional amigável, ele so eh seletivo com os seus amigos! =P UIN: 1992397 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mAiL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hP: http://info.campus2.br/~mdapaz
Re: w3m e links nao navegam
unholycurse wrote: E ai lista Formatei um HD e instalei o debian testing netinst peladasso instalei o w3m e da a mensagem Opening sockets e nao navega... A rede esta ok e puxa arquivos do ftp, tb pingo sites http e da retorno, o q pode ser isso? Eu costumo usar o 'lynx'. Apesar de achar q deveria funcionar c/ o w3m tbm, tente com ele. Será q vc está resolvendo os nomes direitinho? Ou é problema no site q vc tá acessando? -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: w3m e links nao navegam
cara, qual nao foi minha surpresa quando nem dei bola para o w3m e segui isntalando as outras coisas... instalei isso aki: xserver-xfree86 kde-core xfonts-base kde-i18n-ptbr bem, qual nao foi minha surpresa, no kde funcionou o konqueror pra navegar! (to escrevendo esse e-mail nele...) fui no konsole e testei o w3m e tava funfando... vai entender, meu debian eh maluko... o que sera q aconteceu? Falow! On 8/22/05, Marcos Vinicius Lazarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unholycurse wrote: E ai lista Formatei um HD e instalei o debian testing netinst peladasso instalei o w3m e da a mensagem Opening sockets e nao navega... A rede esta ok e puxa arquivos do ftp, tb pingo sites http e da retorno, o q pode ser isso? Eu costumo usar o 'lynx'. Apesar de achar q deveria funcionar c/ o w3m tbm, tente com ele. Será q vc está resolvendo os nomes direitinho? Ou é problema no site q vc tá acessando? -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - O linux eh um sistema operacional amigável, ele so eh seletivo com os seus amigos! =P UIN: 1992397 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mAiL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hP: http://info.campus2.br/~mdapaz
Re: w3m e links nao navegam
unholycurse wrote: cara, qual nao foi minha surpresa quando nem dei bola para o w3m e segui isntalando as outras coisas... instalei isso aki: xserver-xfree86 kde-core xfonts-base kde-i18n-ptbr bem, qual nao foi minha surpresa, no kde funcionou o konqueror pra navegar! (to escrevendo esse e-mail nele...) fui no konsole e testei o w3m e tava funfando... vai entender, meu debian eh maluko... o que sera q aconteceu? Pode ter sido alguma instabilidade na rede no momento q vc estava testando... Outro dia mesmo fui ajudar um Prof. a testar um notebook novo, e a rede não funcionava de jeito nenhum. Qual não foi a nossa surpresa ao descobrir que estavam mexendo nos servidores/switchs naquele exato momento? De quebra, o link externo tbm estava down. Vai ter azar assim lá na pqp! :-) Para os curiosos: a rede do note estava perfeita ;-) -- Marcos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: encodage de caractères avec w3m
Bernard Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Si je change les ISO-8859-1* en UTF-8, les accents ne passent plus. Mes locales sont : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15 fr_FR ISO-8859-1 fr_FR.UTF-8 UTF-8 [EMAIL PROTECTED] UTF-8 Je suppose que le problème vient d'une des premières lignes du .w3m/config. Bon, ça ne vient pas forcément du .w3m/config : si je lance w3m dans un xterm unicode c'est impeccable. Ca vient sans doute de mes locales... -- Bernard Adrian http://bernadrian.free.fr/wordpress -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
encodage de caractères avec w3m
Bonsoir, Je voudrais utiliser w3m qui me semble avoir beaucoup d'atouts. Mais je bute sur un problème : sur ma machine, contrairement à elinks, il ne reconnait pas les apostrophes sur les sites codés en utf-8. Il s'agit bien de w3m et pas d'emacs-w3m. Les accents passent bien, il n'y a que les apostrophes qui sont affichées comme des ?. Voici le début du ~/.w3m/config : gb18030_as_ucs 0 strict_iso2022 0 use_jisx0213 0 use_jisx0212 0 use_jisx0201k 0 use_jisc6226 0 use_jisx0201 0 use_gb12345_map 0 fix_width_conv 1 search_conv 1 pre_conv 1 ucs_conv 1 use_language_tag 1 use_combining 1 use_wide 1 ext_halfdump 0 follow_locale 1 system_charset ISO-8859-1 auto_detect 2 document_charset ISO-8859-15 display_charset ISO-8859-1 Si je change les ISO-8859-1* en UTF-8, les accents ne passent plus. Mes locales sont : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15 fr_FR ISO-8859-1 fr_FR.UTF-8 UTF-8 [EMAIL PROTECTED] UTF-8 Je suppose que le problème vient d'une des premières lignes du .w3m/config. Quelqu'un aurait une idée ? Merci, -- Bernard Adrian http://bernadrian.free.fr/wordpress -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w3m with lynx bindings
I have installed the w3m package in Debian sarge and read in the documentation that the lynx key bindings can be chosen at compile time. I'm used to the lynx bindings, is it possible to get them in the package or are w3m bindings more convenient in this case and I should learn them? Thank you for any help, Miguel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit w3m im buffer suchen
Hallo Liste, Gibt es einen Weg wie ich w3m dazu überrede Matches zu Suchpatterns im betrachteten Dokument hervorzuheben? Ich kann bei Zeiten nämlich den Cursor vor lauter Zeichen nicht wieder finden ;) Lynx und Links machen das offensichtlich, w3m konnte ich bisher nicht dazu bewegen. Gruss, Frank -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
w3m-ssl - howto?
Hi, my favorite browser is w3m but unfortunately I'm not able to get ssl certificates to work correctly under w3m. I have installed w3m-ssl (from woody) and set: ssl_ca_file /home/myhome/.w3m/ssl-ca.pem ssl_ca_path /home/myhome/.w3m/ ssl_key_file ssl_cert_file ssl_verify_server 1 ssl_forbid_method ssl-ca.pem is a valid certificate file, successfully tested under mozilla. I have no entries for ssl_key_file and ssl_cert_file. (What are these? Do I have to have them? How would I get them? Is there a howto for dummies?) With this setting (and also if I leave ssl_ca_path empty) visiting a certified site I get: unable to get issuer certificate: accept? (y/n) If I leave ssl_ca_file empty I get: unable to get local issuer certificate: accept? (y/n) Is there any easy way to make w3m accept the certificates contained in ssl-ca.pem? Thanks a lot in advance! Andreas Goesele -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
browser w3m
All Por acaso alguem aqui na lista utiliza o browser w3m ? É que eu estou com uma dúvida e não encontrei na documentação do browser. [ ]'s ***.''`. * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * : :' : * GNU/Linux Debian * `. `'` *** `- Gnupg ID 0x01186BE1 Key fingerprint =3D F17E 75C6 CE00 0E09 F63B 71B0 A0D2 FAD9 0118 6BE1 A vitoria tem mil pais e a derrota e orfa. -- Napoleao Bonaparte
w3m
Hi. Wie kann ich verhindern, das mit w3m die Webseite so weit nach rechts noch weitergeht? ich will einen Zeilenumbruch haben! MFG -- Markus Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/09/2002 (10:01) : It pains me that you used that harsh language to describe my comment. Sorry it wasn't my intention. just caught up in the excitement of the moment! :-) Those are /bin/sh syntax, which I prefer better than anything that depends upon /bin/csh. I don't know why you thought that was bash only. [*] Somebody mentioned that it was only ash and bash that had this command. Those commands are defined by SUSv2. I am pleased that I can refer you to these pages for your edification. (And perhaps mine too in the case that I made a mistake here. I am only too well aware that the sword can cut both ways.) http://www.unix-systems.org/single_unix_specification_v2/xcu/type.html http://www.unix-systems.org/single_unix_specification_v2/xcu/command.html Thanks. Repeat after me, Standard is better than better. And then say, Every programmer should strive to write portable code. But to do Why do you think I use Ada95 :-) By the way there is a shell called bush which can be interesting (at least for scripting) : http://www.pegasoft.ca/bush.html Preben -- When Roman engineers built a bridge, they had to stand under it while the first legion marched across. If programmers today worked under similar ground rules, they might well find themselves getting much more interested in Ada! -- Robert Dewar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Connecting urlview Mozilla, via w3m ?
Adam Bogacki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/09/2002 (09:59) : On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:50:00PM +0200 or thereabouts, Preben Randhol wrote: Thanks. How does one express the option ... checking /usr/bin/X11 showed no mozilla or netscape. The other option - /home/adam/.mozilla - did not work in w3m ... we'll see. /home/adam/.mozilla is a directory not a program so you must type /usr/bin/mozilla But change the http_prgs line (in /etc/urlview/url_handler.sh) to: http_prgs=/usr/bin/mozilla:PW /usr/bin/w3m:XT or if you do a : apt-get install galeon http_prgs=/usr/bin/galeon:PW /usr/bin/w3m:XT -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ -- Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, Isaac Asimov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
Preben Randhol [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-22 10:10:49 +0200]: By the way there is a shell called bush which can be interesting (at least for scripting) : http://www.pegasoft.ca/bush.html Interesting! Thanks for sharing that. Bob msg03060/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 04:55, Preben Randhol wrote: [SNIP!!!] Although it also puzzels me why people use mozilla when galeon has a much better interface. -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ -- Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, Isaac Asimov Galeon has a *different* interface, which for some proves to be much better. It depends on individual tastes - once I imported my bookmarks, Galeon never quite worked the way the original installation presented. Mozilla works enough like Netscape that it is a familiar interface for many people, and as Galeon depends on it anyhow, for some people it becomes a question of Why use the extra code, when Mozilla is there already? It is a variation of the vi vs. emacs crusades, or Open Look vs. Motif, or GNOME vs. KDE (or in some circles, Linux vs. BSD vs. the Hurd.) Trust people to find which browser they prefer, based on familiarity, needs and constructive individual experience - as long as it respects Internet standards and doesn't launch viruses or worms, if it is effective for the user, then good for them. -- Mark L. Kahnt, FLMI/M, ALHC, HIA, AIAA, ACS, MHP ML Kahnt New Markets Consulting Tel: (613) 531-8684 / (613) 539-0935 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
* Preben Randhol [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21-09-2002 10:56]: Although it also puzzels me why people use mozilla when galeon has a much better interface. Agreed, one thing I miss though. (Please make my day if this is also possible within Galeon.) In Mozilla I could prevent websites to change the status-bar message. I am not sure if this does what I think it does. But a big annoyance is scrolling text that prevents seeing where a link is pointing to. If I remember correctly, I never saw that in Mozilla. Now we're on the topic of Galeon anyway. I am not sure that zap-colors (a bookmarklet that changes for instance pink text on yellow background to black on white). I haven't been able to do this recently. I assume that this has to do with fancy stuff like style sheets and other stuff I know nothing about. Does anyone know a website that this bookmarklet should work on? I want to be sure I am not wasting my eyes when an obvious solution is available that now is broken for one reason or another. Bob p.s. if you want to answer my question but are ashamed to reveal knowledge of a website with questionable layout (and usually content), please reply in a private message. I can keep a secret ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/09/2002 (11:51) : Well, obviously if you're using #! /bin/sh then you don't need to worry about what csh will make of it. Actually 'type' works in bash, ash, and zsh, while 'command -v' works in bash and ash. Both are extensions to the strict POSIX shell syntax, though. but if you run which then you have trhis script (on Debian at least) #!/bin/bash unalias -a unset -- $@ /dev/null enable -n -- $@ /dev/null type -p $@ so this should also work in tcsh as long as bash is installed ? Although it also puzzels me why people use mozilla when galeon has a much better interface. I can't stand galeon's interface: it feels too clunky and doesn't respond to me in the way I want. mozilla's interface is much smoother for me. That should prove that it's a matter of taste. :) yes, indeed ;-) -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ -- Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, Isaac Asimov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Connecting urlview Mozilla, via w3m ?
Adam Bogacki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/09/2002 (13:36) : Hi, I have now got w3m working with Mozilla on HTML attachments but in the case of urlview (^B to get a list of URL's in the message) the hard drive just grinds away and nothing happens. Is there a way of connecting 'urlview' to Mozilla, perhaps via w3m ? check: /etc/urlview/url_handler.sh -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ -- Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, Isaac Asimov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
Michael Kristensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/09/2002 (15:53) : * Preben Randhol [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-21 15:42:17]: Robert Ian Smit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/09/2002 (11:25) : pointing to. If I remember correctly, I never saw that in Mozilla. ^^^ galeon? If you are reading what he wrote again, it says that he never saw scrolling text in the status bar in Mozilla, because of the option to turn it off. At least that is how I understand it. Ah I understood it as he never saw the feature in galeon :-) Anyway you can turn off the scrolling galeon too. -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ -- Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, Isaac Asimov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/09/2002 (15:55) : I regard portable scripts as ones that work on systems other than Debian. In particular, I need that condition in my work environment. Also the script above has a bug that as far as I can tell can't be fixed properly without a complete rewrite (#94507). ok so if I write a script I must spesify that it should be either ash or bash. Do all versions of these provide command -v with the same functionality? Partability between UNIXes is not easy at all as most of the time the commands take different flags so you need to make versions for the different flavours. -- Preben Randhol http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ -- Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, Isaac Asimov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:58:30PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/09/2002 (15:55) : I regard portable scripts as ones that work on systems other than Debian. In particular, I need that condition in my work environment. Also the script above has a bug that as far as I can tell can't be fixed properly without a complete rewrite (#94507). ok so if I write a script I must spesify that it should be either ash or bash. No, the best thing to do for portable scripts is to specify /bin/sh and use only standardized syntax. (Unfortunately the POSIX sh specification is payware ... but SUSv2 at least comes close.) Many systems don't have either ash or bash. Some that do don't have them in /bin, so you can't just say '#! /bin/bash', and the #! executable interpreter mechanism doesn't search the $PATH. /bin/sh is really all you can rely upon there. Do all versions of these provide command -v with the same functionality? Possibly. It's hard to tell as 'command -v' is an extension to POSIX, not in POSIX sh itself. Partability between UNIXes is not easy at all as most of the time the commands take different flags so you need to make versions for the different flavours. That's why standards are there. Coming up with versions for different Unix flavours should be avoided where possible - it quickly turns into a nightmare. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-21 15:09:40 +0100]: Possibly. It's hard to tell as 'command -v' is an extension to POSIX, not in POSIX sh itself. It is used in SUSv3, however, and therefore should be good for anyone that complies with that. And actually that was specifically why I included that in the list of possibilities. Bob -- The wonderful thing about standards are that there are so many to choose from. msg02893/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Connecting urlview Mozilla, via w3m ?
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:50:00PM +0200 or thereabouts, Preben Randhol wrote: Adam Bogacki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/09/2002 (13:36) : Hi, I have now got w3m working with Mozilla on HTML attachments but in the case of urlview (^B to get a list of URL's in the message) the hard drive just grinds away and nothing happens. Is there a way of connecting 'urlview' to Mozilla, perhaps via w3m ? check: /etc/urlview/url_handler.sh Thanks. How does one express the option ... checking /usr/bin/X11 showed no mozilla or netscape. The other option - /home/adam/.mozilla - did not work in w3m ... we'll see. Cheers, Adam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands? apt-cache show mozilla-browser I think he was looking for 'type' and 'command', not 'mozilla'. Oh, okay. I parsed the grammer the other way. The messages are the almost same when the command you are looking for, mozilla in this case, is not found. And they're builtin commands if 'bash' is your shell (and maybe others). Hopefully lots of others. Those are defined by standards such as SUSv3. I expect every standard shell to have them. And by standard that does leave out csh. ;-) But any shell that claims to be a POSIX shell that could function as /bin/sh on a modern system should be good to go for those. Bob msg02654/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
DvB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-20 16:50:14 -0500]: csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 01:20:21 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: unless I under-read the man page, can't do wild-card history searches. For the record I did not write that. csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote that. I realize we both look the same on the computer display. :-) Bob msg02764/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes: DvB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-20 16:50:14 -0500]: csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 01:20:21 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: unless I under-read the man page, can't do wild-card history searches. For the record I did not write that. csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote that. I realize we both look the same on the computer display. :-) Hmm... I thought I was following up to the sender's message... sorry. You do look exactly the same on my computer :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configuring w3m for Mozilla
Hi, Mutt goes into w3m when I open a HTML attachment, but when I hit 'M' to launch Mozilla, GKrellm shows the CPU operating at 99% ... but no Mozilla. I hit 'o' for the option menu and replaced the external viewer option with '/home/adam/.mozilla' ... where is the error ? Adam Bogacki, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla
Adam Bogacki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Mutt goes into w3m when I open a HTML attachment, but when I hit 'M' to launch Mozilla, GKrellm shows the CPU operating at 99% ... but no Mozilla. I hit 'o' for the option menu and replaced the external viewer option with '/home/adam/.mozilla' ... where is the error ? Well... I don't know anything about mutt, but ~/.mozilla is usually a non-executable directory containing configuration files for your mozilla profile. I'd suggest using the correct execurable for mozilla. To find it, try running which mozilla, minus the quotes and the comma from the command line. HTH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla
* DvB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-09-2002 16:22]: try running which mozilla, minus the quotes and the comma from the command line. Why did you put the comma there in the first place. Is it some kind of notation I have never seen before? Now it looks like: type which mozilla have a nice day without the quotes and have a nice day. ;) Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
Robert Ian Smit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * DvB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-09-2002 16:22]: try running which mozilla, minus the quotes and the comma from the command line. Why did you put the comma there in the first place. Is it some kind of notation I have never seen before? :-) I was merely following commonly accepted punctuation rules for American English which state that, when a comma (or period) follows a quoted passage, the comma should be placed before the final quote. I understand this isn't the case with British English, but I happen to live on the new continent, so I figure I should follow local rules. What's more, after looking at what I wrote, there really should be another comma after the word comma and before the word from. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
DvB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-19 10:50:34 -0500]: try running which mozilla, minus the quotes and the comma from the command line. I was merely following commonly accepted punctuation rules for American English which state that, when a comma (or period) follows a quoted Ah, but languages were switched. You were no longer talking American English but Computer User. When talking CU new rules are applied. At that time all literal strings are quoted exactly with characters you wish the user to type. :-) I have taken to offsetting in a block quote format just to be explicit. And it makes cut-n-paste easier. which mozilla But instead of that old csh script 'which' I prefer newer commands such as 'command' or 'type'. (Yes I see that on debian which is now a bash script instead of a csh script. But this is not true everywhere.) type mozilla command -v mozilla Bob msg02541/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes: DvB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-19 10:50:34 -0500]: try running which mozilla, minus the quotes and the comma from the command line. I was merely following commonly accepted punctuation rules for American English which state that, when a comma (or period) follows a quoted Ah, but languages were switched. You were no longer talking American English but Computer User. When talking CU new rules are applied. At that time all literal strings are quoted exactly with characters you wish the user to type. :-) You're probably right. It's hard trying to balance being pretty anal about spelling and grammar (when I actually know the correct spelling/usage, that is :-) and being a nerd. I have taken to offsetting in a block quote format just to be explicit. And it makes cut-n-paste easier. which mozilla But instead of that old csh script 'which' I prefer newer commands such as 'command' or 'type'. (Yes I see that on debian which is now a bash script instead of a csh script. But this is not true everywhere.) type mozilla command -v mozilla Those must be relatively new. I graduated from college pretty recently and only learned which mozilla whereis mozilla I've always known type as the DOS version of cat. I also never gave much thought to how they were implemented before :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
On 19 Sep 2002 11:22:05 -0500 DvB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes: DvB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-19 10:50:34 -0500]: [snip] I have taken to offsetting in a block quote format just to be explicit. And it makes cut-n-paste easier. which mozilla But instead of that old csh script 'which' I prefer newer commands such as 'command' or 'type'. (Yes I see that on debian which is now a bash script instead of a csh script. But this is not true everywhere.) type mozilla command -v mozilla Those must be relatively new. I graduated from college pretty recently and only learned which mozilla whereis mozilla I've always known type as the DOS version of cat. I also never gave much thought to how they were implemented before :-) vega:~ type mozilla type: Command not found. vega:~ command -v mozilla command: Command not found. I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
* DvB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-09-2002 17:59]: I was merely following commonly accepted punctuation rules for American English which state that, when a comma (or period) follows a quoted passage, the comma should be placed before the final quote. Oh man, now I can't sleep before I remember those rules for the Dutch language. If I remember correctly those rules were relaxed. Only use a comma if the meaning of the sentence dictates it or if it improves readability. Makes sense to me, but have to be sure. Where's google? Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-20 07:21:58 +0800]: vega:~ type mozilla type: Command not found. vega:~ command -v mozilla command: Command not found. I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands? apt-cache show mozilla-browser Bob msg02602/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bob Proulx wrote: csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-20 07:21:58 +0800]: vega:~ type mozilla type: Command not found. vega:~ command -v mozilla command: Command not found. I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands? apt-cache show mozilla-browser I think he was looking for 'type' and 'command', not 'mozilla'. Patrick -- Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux user #17943 *Google First, Ask Later* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] punctuation (was Re: Configuring w3m for Mozilla)
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, I wrote: On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bob Proulx wrote: csj [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-20 07:21:58 +0800]: vega:~ type mozilla type: Command not found. vega:~ command -v mozilla command: Command not found. I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands? apt-cache show mozilla-browser I think he was looking for 'type' and 'command', not 'mozilla'. And they're builtin commands if 'bash' is your shell (and maybe others). So, OP, what's your shell? -- Patrick Wiseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux user #17943 *Google First, Ask Later* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mutt and html viewers to specify w3m under x
hello, i run mutt in Eterm. with $DISPLAY set, it launches galeon to view html, but not only does galeon not find mutt.html (?), but i don't want to spawn another window (galeon). so, i unset $DISPLAY in that term, and mutt uses w3m to view html. this is nice, i like it better. i just found w3m-img, (displays images even in Eterm) which is currently in sid (i'm running woody, it installed just fine). my problem is, with $DISPLAY unset, w3m will not display the images. is there any way, within mutt, to specify w3m to view html and not let gnome use it's default? tia, jason -- --- | http://theigloo.dhs.org:81 | http://counter.li.org/| | Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 Woody | 2.4.16-k6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | registered linux user #202942 | --- pgpgqnEwruB1q.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: mutt and html viewers to specify w3m under x
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:46:29AM -0500, Jason M. Harvey wrote: | hello, | | i run mutt in Eterm. with $DISPLAY set, it launches galeon to view html, | but not only does galeon not find mutt.html (?), but i don't want to | spawn another window (galeon). so, i unset $DISPLAY in that term, and | mutt uses w3m to view html. this is nice, i like it better. | i just found w3m-img, (displays images even in Eterm) which is currently | in sid (i'm running woody, it installed just fine). | my problem is, with $DISPLAY unset, w3m will not display the images. is | there any way, within mutt, to specify w3m to view html and not let | gnome use it's default? Put the w3m-img entry from /etc/mailcap at the top so that it is the first handler found. -D -- Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall. Proverbs 16:18 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mutt and html viewers to specify w3m under x
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:55:02AM -0600, dman wrote: | On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:46:29AM -0500, Jason M. Harvey wrote: | | hello, | | | | i run mutt in Eterm. with $DISPLAY set, it launches galeon to view html, | | but not only does galeon not find mutt.html (?), but i don't want to | | spawn another window (galeon). so, i unset $DISPLAY in that term, and | | mutt uses w3m to view html. this is nice, i like it better. | | i just found w3m-img, (displays images even in Eterm) which is currently | | in sid (i'm running woody, it installed just fine). | | my problem is, with $DISPLAY unset, w3m will not display the images. is | | there any way, within mutt, to specify w3m to view html and not let | | gnome use it's default? | | Put the w3m-img entry from /etc/mailcap at the top so that it is the | first handler found. | | -D | | -- | | Pride goes before destruction, | a haughty spirit before a fall. | Proverbs 16:18 thanks again, dman! the only thing is... it doesn't seem to be displaying the images... but at least it doesn't launch galeon anymore. i'll give it a try like this a few days and see what w3m does (with w3m-img). thanks! jason -- --- | http://theigloo.dhs.org:81 | http://counter.li.org/| | Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 Woody | 2.4.16-k6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | registered linux user #202942 | --- pgpao8pDXtjK4.pgp Description: PGP signature
w3m (Re: Netscape 6.2)
On Monday 10 December 2001 12:57 am, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote: Karsten M. Self wrote: Karsten's Iron Rule of Browsers: they all suck. http://kmself.home.netcom.com/GNU/Linux/FAQs/browsers.html ...but I take it back. Galeon Kicks Ass®. s/GNU\/// http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/browsers.html Speaking of browsers, how does one go back and forward in w3m? Alec _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: w3m (Re: Netscape 6.2)
Alec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Monday 10 December 2001 12:57 am, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote: Karsten M. Self wrote: Karsten's Iron Rule of Browsers: they all suck. http://kmself.home.netcom.com/GNU/Linux/FAQs/browsers.html ...but I take it back. Galeon Kicks Ass®. s/GNU\/// http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/browsers.html Speaking of browsers, how does one go back and forward in w3m? While in w3m, type H to see a listing of all the key bindings. Or use the cool w3m mode in emacs (from the w3m-el package) and use the emacs menu bar to learn the key bindings. -- Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bignachos.com