Re: which SQL database?
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Randy Edwards writes: Both have excellent manuals and tutorials. Being in the process of teaching myself SQL by way of PostgreSQL, I have to say that the PostgreSQL docs fall far short of my definition of excellent. I'm afraid that I'd agree, but the docs do seem to be improving. For instance, according to the postgresql web site, Bruce Momjian is in the process of writing a book about postgres, and the working draft is on the postgres web site: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/awbook.html --Miguel
which SQL database?
Hi! I wanted to setup a Apache+PHP3 Intranet Database Server, Orcale, MySQL or PostgreSQL, which one is more easy to learn and config also better supported by Apache+PHP3 ?
Re: which SQL database?
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 21:21:37 +0800, Alex Kwan wrote: I wanted to setup a Apache+PHP3 Intranet Database Server, Orcale, MySQL or PostgreSQL, which one is more easy to learn and config also better supported by Apache+PHP3 ? I haven't worked with Oracle, but I suspect it is quite complex (given the fact that Oracle DBA is a valid job description nowadays, and the large number of Oracle consultants around). PostgreSQL is probably slightly more difficult to learn than MySQL, but it is truely free and supports many more SQL / relational database functionality (e.g. transactions). I suspect PHP's support for PostgreSQL and MySQL is more or less comparable. HTH, Ray -- ART A friend of mine in Tulsa, Okla., when I was about eleven years old. I'd be interested to hear from him. There are so many pseudos around taking his name in vain. - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
Re: which SQL database?
I wanted to setup a Apache+PHP3 Intranet Database Server, Orcale, MySQL or PostgreSQL, which one is more easy to learn and config also better supported by Apache+PHP3 ? As far as ease of learning I'd say they're a tossup, six in one hand, half-dozen in the other (not saying I'm an expert in either:-). Both have excellent manuals and tutorials. Apache and PHP3 will happily get along with either of them. MySQL is faster, but at the sake of some redundancy/features. MySQL also has a quirky, non-free license. PostgreSQL is slower but is a fuller SQL implementation. It's also DFSG free. -- Regards, | What's free software? - Free speech? Free beer? .| Randy| http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
Re: which SQL database?
Randy Edwards writes: Both have excellent manuals and tutorials. Being in the process of teaching myself SQL by way of PostgreSQL, I have to say that the PostgreSQL docs fall far short of my definition of excellent. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI
Re: which SQL database?
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 04:26:26PM -0400, Randy Edwards wrote: MySQL is faster, but at the sake of some redundancy/features. MySQL also has a quirky, non-free license. PostgreSQL is slower but is a fuller SQL implementation. It's also DFSG free. Someone did some benchmarking awhile back with PostgreSQL, MySQL, INFORMIX and Oracle. Not surprisingly, Oracle did the best overall. But more of a surprise was that PostgreSQL was faster than MySQL in certain join queries and overall got rated higher. Think PostgreSQL was faster for inserts/updates too. Memories a little cloudy... I would've like to seen Sybase ASE in the benchmark, since it's supposed to be pretty fast. -- #! /bin/sh echo 'Linux Must Die!' | wall dd if=/dev/zero of=/vmlinuz bs=1 \ count=`du -Lb /vmlinuz | awk '{ /^([0-9])+/ ; print $1 }'` shutdown -r now