Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 192656 ITA: propaganda-debian -- A Propaganda background image volume for Debian. Bug#192656: O: propaganda-debian -- A Propaganda background image volume for Debian. Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: adopt ffcall
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 130293 ITA: ffcall Bug#130293: RFA: ffcall -- Foreign Function Call Libraries Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 193118 ITA: tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder Bug#193118: RFA: tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder Changed Bug title. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#178979: ITA: gtick -- GTK-based metronome
The new package is located at http://www.antcom.de/debian/ until my sponsor uploads it into the archive. (I'm still waiting for DAM approval in the NM process.) -- Roland Stigge signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#193399: ITP: latex209 -- macro files of LaTeX 2.09 25-mar-1992 version
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2003 10:08:37 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fielder George Dowding) said as follows:
I use LaTeX2e and friends (almost daily).
I know that LaTeX-2.09 is obsolete, however I need it to process
ancient TeX sources without modification.
If your documents starts with a '\documentstyle{your_style}' call
instead of a '\documentclass' one the 209 compatibility mode should
automatically be activated. What kind of problems are you experiencing?
Cheers,
--
=
Agustin Martin Domingo, Dpto. de Fisica, ETS Arquitectura Madrid,
(U. Politecnica de Madrid) tel: +34 91-336-6536, Fax: +34 91-336-6554,
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://corbu.aq.upm.es/~agmartin/welcome.html
Bug#193399: ITP: latex209 -- macro files of LaTeX 2.09 25-mar-1992 version
On Fri, 16 May 2003 12:55:54 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Agustin Martin Domingo) said as follows:
If your documents starts with a '\documentstyle{your_style}' call
instead of a '\documentclass' one the 209 compatibility mode should
automatically be activated. What kind of problems are you
experiencing?
It is true that the 2.09 compatibility mode works finely in almost
cases. However, LaTeX-2.09 itself still be needed for style files
that use internal macros of LaTeX-2.09. The style file of my
bachelor's thesis is an example of such style files, and there are a
fair number of sources that use it. When one of them is processed in
the 2.09 compatibility mode, the following message is printed.
! Undefined control sequence.
--
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi
Bug#193074: RFP: mozilla-spellchecker -- Mozilla spellchecker - spell checking engine for the Mozilla Composer and the Mozilla Mail
Hi Mantas, hi Takuo, Mantas Kriauciunas wrote: Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-12 Severity: wishlist * Package name: mozilla-spellchecker Version : 1.3.x Upstream Author : David Einstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://spellchecker.mozdev.org * License : MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1 Description : Mozilla spellchecker - spell checking engine for the Mozilla Composer and the Mozilla Mail Quite long. See above; what I retitled to seems an appropriate description. And you should not mention the name of the program in the description again... Mozilla spellchecker adds spell checking ability to the Mozilla Composer and the Mozilla Mail message composition window. It uses the MySpell spell checking engine (also used in OpenOffice.org) You can use dictionaries from OpenOffice.org or download .xpi packages from http://www.mozcafe.com/download/ OK, as I need mozilla-spellchecker to test the new myspell policy, I may do the initial packaging. However, I do not use mozilla composer or mailnews[1] so I am not a good person for maintaining it. Moreover, the build system of this thing is such broken; it needs to be patched in and build from the mozilla source package. And last but not least I do not have the time for maintaining this package, too... Takuo: so you are the best candidate for maintaining it inside the mozilla source package... Is it OK if I do it and send you a patch and you upload the new package? Regards, Rene [1] mutt rules :-) -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 pgp3YkC96u4RT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#184552: marked as done (ITA: jade -- James Clark's DSSSL Engine)
Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2003 07:02:40 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#184552: fixed in jade 1.2.1-30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2003 01:54:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 12 19:54:15 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com [192.25.240.36] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18tHvC-0003F9-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:54:14 -0600 Received: from relcos2.cos.agilent.com (relcos2.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.237]) by msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238C717D5F; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:54:14 -0700 (MST) Received: from smmihn08.cos.agilent.com (smmihn08.cos.agilent.com [130.29.42.9]) by relcos2.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B06535B; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:54:13 -0700 (MST) Received: by smmihn08.cos.agilent.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF7242E887F; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:54:12 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stephen M Moraco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: jade -- James Clark's DSSSL Engine X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:54:12 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Version: 1.2.1-28; reported 2003-03-12 Severity: normal I intend to orphan the jade package. It is replaced by openjade. The package description is: Jade is an implementation of the DSSSL style language. . The jade engine is a useful tool (in conjunction with a DSSSL style sheet) for translating SGML documents into other formats. Jade can currently generate SGML, RTF, and TeX. In conjunction with the jadetex TeX style, it can generate quite nice output. . Author: James Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.jclark.com/jade/ -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux smmihn08 2.4.17 #1 Sat Jan 26 22:13:28 MST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 184552-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2003 11:08:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 06:08:03 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19Gd4F-0001RW-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 06:08:03 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19Gcz2-0003CY-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 07:02:40 -0400 From: Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#184552: fixed in jade 1.2.1-30 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 07:02:40 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jade, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: jade_1.2.1-30.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jade/jade_1.2.1-30.diff.gz jade_1.2.1-30.dsc to pool/main/j/jade/jade_1.2.1-30.dsc jade_1.2.1-30_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jade/jade_1.2.1-30_i386.deb libsp1-dev_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jade/libsp1-dev_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb libsp1_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jade/libsp1_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb sp_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jade/sp_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated jade package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 18:24:20 -0400 Source: jade Binary: jade libsp1 sp libsp1-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2.1-30 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#193399: ITP: latex209 -- macro files of LaTeX 2.09 25-mar-1992 version
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote: It is true that the 2.09 compatibility mode works finely in almost cases. However, LaTeX-2.09 itself still be needed for style files that use internal macros of LaTeX-2.09. The style file of my bachelor's thesis is an example of such style files, and there are a fair number of sources that use it. When one of them is processed in the 2.09 compatibility mode, the following message is printed. ! Undefined control sequence. I see. I do not know how complex is that style file, but I guess that the amount of work you will need to make the 209 latex package properly install and work in a reasonable way without breaking latex2e behavior and without being broken by latex2e compatible style files (not only the base files, but other style files too that have replaced the old files having the same name but being now written for latex2e) is really high and might be broken by changes in tetex files that are being rewritten to be latex2e aware. Unless that style file is a nightmare I would really consider its rewriting rather than preparing a package with the obsolete latex209 stuff if the above possible problems cannot be clearly managed. I am cc'ing this message to the debian-tetex-maint list. I think they would also like to know about this and will have a much better knowledge than I have about how possible it is and the incompatibilities that might arise. Cheers, -- Agustin
Bug#193118: marked as done (ITA: tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder)
Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2003 08:17:19 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#193118: fixed in tcpflow 0.20-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2003 01:00:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 12 20:00:17 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from hadesian.demon.co.uk (hadesian.co.uk) [62.49.3.204] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19FO9R-00034Q-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 20:00:17 -0500 Received: by hadesian.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2F21A18D4F9; Tue, 13 May 2003 02:00:16 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 02:00:16 +0100 From: Robert McQueen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFA: tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Looking for a new maintainer for tcpflow. Small simple package, I just don't use it and there are a few bugs which should be looked in to. Havn't been any upstream releases in ages, but the upstream was responsive in the past and looks to still be active in developing other software, so I'm sure he'll help with problems if contacted. Regards, Rob --- Received: (at 193118-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2003 12:23:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 07:23:10 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19GeEw-0003Yy-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 07:23:10 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19Ge9H-0006fP-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 08:17:19 -0400 From: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#193118: fixed in tcpflow 0.20-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 08:17:19 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tcpflow, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tcpflow_0.20-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tcpflow/tcpflow_0.20-2.diff.gz tcpflow_0.20-2.dsc to pool/main/t/tcpflow/tcpflow_0.20-2.dsc tcpflow_0.20-2_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tcpflow/tcpflow_0.20-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated tcpflow package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Friday, 16 May 2003 11:48:56 + Source: tcpflow Binary: tcpflow Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.20-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: tcpflow- TCP flow recorder Closes: 156186 193118 Changes: tcpflow (0.20-2) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer. (Closes: 193118) * Incorporated the NMU (Closes: 156186) * Updated standards version to 3.5.9 Files: 337774748a8742ea8fa064e09a039e85 564 net optional tcpflow_0.20-2.dsc e10c3d1e39aa9987aa86b6421417971c 2697 net optional tcpflow_0.20-2.diff.gz c78a39ba0aaf43505e88a94031a5dab4 21562 net optional tcpflow_0.20-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+xNLmwM/Gs81MDZ0RAuH6AJ9X6kF6hWEUF71inPB7xmx897MO9QCgw8RU Ig19TEeW5tTRFo3KN6oDkPY= =znQn -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#192660: O: makepasswd -- Generate and encrypt passwords
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:46:34AM -0700, Ted Cabeen wrote: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I suppose makepasswd isn't a major feature improvement over the combination of pwgen and mkpasswd, so if somebody wanted to remove it I wouldn't object too strongly. I don't think it's entirely redundant, though. Its not entirely redundant. I like it because it has the most option of any of the usual programs that people use, and because it's written in perl, so it's easy to transfer to other systems and platforms. I often forget which of pwgen and mkpasswd has the option I want, so I'll just use makepasswd for simplicity. BTW: Colin, if you decide that you don't want to adopt this one, I'd be happy to take it as well. I use it quite a bit and it looked like a nice simple package to have as my first debian package. I have plenty of packages, so I see no reason to stand in the way of a new maintainer, provided you fix its bugs and maintain it well. :) Sounds like you use it more than me anyway. Send me a diff and I'll have a look; my current version has fixes for #50885, #147808, #168492, and #190485. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: OSG
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 172189 Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#172189: ITP: openscenegraph -- C++/OpenGL based graphics development library. Changed Bug submitter from Hugo van der Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED]. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#172189: OSG
submitter 172189 Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Hallo! I noticed I never sent another email to wnpp. I'm taking the liberty of changing the submitter to your address. (You still intend to package it?) I'll still be excessively busy for the next 5 weeks or so. Hugo -- The earth's surface is accelerating outward at 9.8 meters per sec^2 1024D/60715698: 5F2E 8EC2 E0A4 5D25 0569 F281 4A6C D76D 6071 5698 pgp1ZEjhxRDYt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#179066: marked as done (ITP: exim4 -- EXperimental Internal Mailer -- a Mail Transport Agent)
Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2003 12:47:13 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#179066: fixed in exim4 4.14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2003 16:20:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 30 10:20:12 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from server.logic.univie.ac.at [131.130.190.41] ([sRU85zuHkrWULTHxIeWdCKkYaI7mjpR9]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18eHQA-P9-00; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:20:10 -0600 Received: from balrog.logic.univie.ac.at ([131.130.190.58] ident=mail) by server.logic.univie.ac.at with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #3 ) id 18eHQH-000401-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:20:17 +0100 Received: from ametzler by balrog.logic.univie.ac.at with local (Exim 4.12 #1 (Debian) [+prerelease]) id 18eHQ6-0001O0-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:20:06 +0100 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:20:06 +0100 From: Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ITP: exim4 -- EXperimental Internal Mailer -- a Mail Transport Agent Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50 Sender: Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-30 Severity: wishlist * Package name: exim4 Version : 4.12 Upstream Author : Philip Hazel [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.exim.org/ * License : GPL with OpenSSL exception Description : EXperimental Internal Mailer -- a Mail Transport Agent A team of several people including the current exim maintainer is preparing packages of Exim v4. The packages will offer (optional) *SQL and TLS support, configuration with debconf and easy upgrades from exim v3. Report of current status, test packages compiled for woody and debianized sources can be found on http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~ametzler/debian/exim4manpages/ A mailinglist for discussion about these packages can be found on http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/exim4debian cu andreas -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux balrog 2.4.19 #1 Mon Okt 21 15:31:20 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=de_AT, LC_CTYPE=de_AT --- Received: (at 179066-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2003 16:53:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 11:53:02 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19GiS6-0001cw-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 11:53:02 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19GiMT-0003YE-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 12:47:13 -0400 From: Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#179066: fixed in exim4 4.14-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:47:13 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of exim4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: exim4-base_4.14-1_i386.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4-base_4.14-1_i386.deb exim4-config_4.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4-config_4.14-1_all.deb exim4-daemon-heavy_4.14-1_i386.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4-daemon-heavy_4.14-1_i386.deb exim4-daemon-light_4.14-1_i386.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4-daemon-light_4.14-1_i386.deb exim4_4.14-1.diff.gz to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4_4.14-1.diff.gz exim4_4.14-1.dsc to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4_4.14-1.dsc exim4_4.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/exim4_4.14-1_all.deb eximon4_4.14-1_i386.deb to pool/main/e/exim4/eximon4_4.14-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#78855: missing
Can't get to chunk.mp3revolution.net; I'm assuming it has fallen entirely off the net. Where can these packages be had? Is anyone willing to commit the time to at least maintain them unofficially? -- Matt Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://zigg.com/ pgpNKPNXWfXJu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#193574: ITP: albatross -- a Toolkit for Stateful Web Applications
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-16 Severity: wishlist * Package name: albatross Version : 1.01 Upstream Author : Object Craft [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.object-craft.com.au/projects/albatross/ * License : BSD Description : a Toolkit for Stateful Web Applications Albatross is a small and flexible Python toolkit for developing highly stateful web applications. It includes, among other things: * An extensible HTML templating system similar to DTML that promotes separation of presentation and implementation. * The ability to place Python code for each page in a dynamically loaded module, or to place each page in its own class. * Optional sessions. * Deployment as CGI programs or mod_python modules. Homepage: http://www.object-craft.com.au/projects/albatross/ A first version of the package is available at http://people.paniq.net/~fabbe/debian/albatross/
Bug#193586: RFA: mnemo -- Notes and Memo Application for Horde
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm not using Horde anymore, so I'm looking for a new maintaner for mnemo and nag. Drop me a line if you're interested. Cheers, -- Luis Bustamante
Bug#193587: RFA: nag -- Multiuser Task List Manager for Horde
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm not using Horde anymore, so I'm looking for a new maintaner for mnemo and nag. Drop me a line if you're interested. Cheers, -- Luis Bustamante
Bug#193606: ITP: swftools -- utilities for handling flash .swf files
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-17 Severity: wishlist * Package name: swftools Version : 0.4.4-1 Upstream Author : Matthias Kramm [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rainer Böhme [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.quiss.org/swftools/ * License : GPL Description : utilities for handling flash .swf files SWF Tools is a collection of SWF manipulation and generation utilities written by Rainer Böhme and Matthias Kramm. It is released under the GPL. . This includes a merging tool (swfcombine), an extracting tool (swfextract), PDF/JPEG/PNG/AVI/WAV to SWF converters (pdf2swf, jpeg2swf, png2swf, avi2swf, and wav2swf), a text parsing tool (swfstrings), an SWF parser (swfdump), and a library for writing and reading SWFs (rfxswflib). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux azuaga 2.4.20-ck6 #2 mié may 14 12:53:10 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=spanish, LC_CTYPE=spanish (ignored: LC_ALL set)
Bug#193604: RFA: qiv -- A quick image viewer for X
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I don't use qiv myself, and lately I don't have enough time, so I would like someone else to maintain it. It's a simple package, it needs to be ported to gtk2, but upstream it's already working on it. Drop me a line if you're interested. Cheers, -- Luis Bustamante
Bug#193606: ITP: swftools -- utilities for handling flash .swf files
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 12:10:38AM +0200, Juan Manuel García Molina wrote: Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-17 Severity: wishlist * Package name: swftools Last time I checked this package, it contained MP3 encoding code from LAME - which cannot be included in Debian due to patent issues. -- Chris pgpUSmoB4tJjx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#193612: ITP: fbpanel -- A lightwight X11 desktop panel
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-17 Severity: wishlist * Package name: fbpanel Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Anatoly Asviyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://fbpanel.sf.net/ * License : BSD Description : A lightweight X11 desktop panel FBPanel is a spinoff of the fspanel (f***ing small panel) with more eye candy. It provides a taskbar (list of all opened windows), desktop switcher, launchbar, clock, is EWMH/NETWM compliant, and has modest resource usage.
Bug#116937: lckdutils
I did indeed make an intent to package, however I was contacted by the original person who was going to package it and was told that someone else was working on putting it together, so I contacted that person back in March, and include their response below. I was assuming that they would send something to the BTS about the fact that they were actually working on it, but apparantly they didn't. I would like to get this package in, as I am particularly eager to have it available (especially since I am maintaining the kernel patch), and am wondering if Arnd is still intending to get a package made? From: Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Taking over ITP] Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 03:24:13 +0100 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kevin Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: RO X-Status: A Content-Length: 11451 Lines: 198 On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:21, Micah Anderson wrote: Arnd, I wanted to drop you into the loop because I am very motivated to get the lkcd package completed. Yann mentioned I should contact you because he had sent his preliminary work to you. Have you gotten anywhere with what he h= as done, where can I pick it up? I have almost finished a package, but would be interested to see what you have in case there is something I should ad= d. I haven't found the time to work on it in the last week, but I had some progress. I have ported it to CVS head, changed lcrash to be built for all available targets in one binary instead of only for the default architecture, and changed building qlcrash to link against qt3-mt. There are two of my coworkers (Michael Holzheu and Andreas Herrman) that working on the upstream code and I planned to go through any changes with them so they can check them in to the CVS. I still want to split out lcrash into its own package, because the other parts are not needed on s390 and check that it builds on the s390 build server. The attached diff is where I stopped last week, hopefully we can merge our work. I am now also in the progress of becoming a DD and want to do the package for my Task. I have put Kevin Rosenberg on CC because he is my Application Maintainer. I am not interested on the kernel-patch-lkcd package, because I'm not actually using it. I only use lcrash to analyse system dumps from the s390 dump facility. Arnd - Forwarded message from Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:37:38 +0100 From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Taking over ITP On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:51:10PM -0800, Micah Anderson wrote: I would like to take over the ITP for the lkcd package. I am not a DD, but I have a sponsor and intend to upload shortly. Ah OK. Please check with Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], who also notified me of his interest in this package, and to whom I have sent my preliminary work. I think it would also make sense that the one taking lkcdutils would adopt the kernel-patch-lkcd package as well. Regards, -- Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 http://www.alcove.com/ Technical support manager =20 Responsable de l'assistance technique Senior Free-Software Consultant = =20 Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres Debian developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])D?veloppeur Debian On Fri, 16 May 2003, Guillaume Morin wrote: Hi, According to the Debian BTS, you intended to package lckdutils along with the kernel patch. Do you still plan to upload it ? Regards, Guillaume. -- Guillaume Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the point of trying to dream anymore ? (Alanis Morisette)
