Bug#201373: RFS: xhangglider
Hi, after my ITA to this package i've forgot to send an RFS. Well now i'm doing it, I have a working package which has the following updates: xhangglider (0.94.0-7) unstable; urgency=low * Changed dependancy on menu to Recommends. (Closes: #184595) * Added spanish translated manpage. * debian/rules - use debian/compat (4) - updated dh_installmanpages to dh_installman (adds debian/xhangglider.manpages) - removed useless debhelper commands - updated dh_installdirs to work with debian/compat = 4 * Updated README.Debian So, if anybody wants to sponsor this package, let me know and I'll send the files. I'm unable to publish them somewhere in the net, since my webserver is under crash recovering process. regards, Rudy -- ++ | Somos libres, seamoslo con software libre * http://debian.org | ++ | http://www.apesol.org.pe -*- http://stone-head.org | | GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21 | ++ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#230602: Description changed, new version (pre5.1)
New Description: A log analyzer with nice output written in Perl Logwatch is a modualar log analyzer that runs every night and mails you the results. It can also be run from command line. . The output is by service and you can limit the output to one particular service. The subscripts which are responsible for the output, mostly convert the raw loglines in structured format. . Logwatch generally ignores the time component in the output, so if you want to investigate a particular problem, you have to go to the raw logfiles. . The homepage of logwatch is: www.logwatch.org Version is now 5.0+5.1pre1.
Bug#230767: ITP: devlabel -- storage device abstraction layer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: devlabel Version : 0.45.04 Upstream Author : Gary Lerhaupt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://linux.dell.com/devlabel/devlabel.html * License : GPL Description : storage device abstraction layer Devlabel is a program which dynamically creates symbolic links to disk/partition names. It uses the disk's and/or partition's unique identifiers to keep the symlink pointed to the correct location even if the underlying partition's name has changed. So, regardless of whether /dev/sdb6 becomes /dev/sdc6, devlabel figures this all out and points the symlink to the correct data. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux caesar 2.4.23-1-686 #1 Sun Nov 30 20:51:10 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Bug#230769: RFP: integcheck -- a system integrity checker
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: integcheck Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Mathieu Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL or Web page : https://gna.org/projects/integcheck/ * License : GNU GPL Description : a system integrity checker Item check is written in Perl. The idea is to check integrity of exposed systems by getting a list of md5 of any important file via ssh, to keep this list on a pretty safe system (a system that do not run any server publicly available), and, finally, to compare everyday this list and with the previous one. As long as the system considered as safe is not compromised, it should inform administrators of any changes on the others systems. As others integrity checker, if its own components are corrupted, it can be fooled. In others words, you cannot have a security policy entirely relying on an integrity checker, and you should always do manual checks regularly to be sure that the integrity checker is not corrupted itself. So what's the point of this tool, if you are still forced to do manual checks? In fact, it is way faster to check integrity of integcheck than integrity of the whole system. On every system you want to monitor, you have to install the integcheck-victim package, and on one computer, at least, you must have to install the integheck-bobby package. The integcheck-victim package provide a specific shell. The integcheck-bobby provide cronjob and scripts to get and compare md5 list. Integcheck is already packaged, using debconf, however the package is not the cleanest possible and some documentation would probably be a nice addition. If someone was willing to package integcheck for Debian, we would gladly collaborate with him, by giving him write access to the repository directly. -- Mathieu Roy +-+ | General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ | | Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ | | Not a native english speaker: | | http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english | +-+
Bug#180789: marked as done (RFP: pizza-business -- a game in which you can run your own pizza business)
Your message dated Mon, 02 Feb 2004 13:11:32 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2003 19:07:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 12 13:07:22 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from net128-053.mclink.it (mail.mclink.it) [195.110.128.53] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18j2E5-0007qT-00; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:07:21 -0600 Received: from zaphod (adsl203-153-141.mclink.it [213.203.153.141]) by mail.mclink.it (8.11.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id h1CJ7Jl28655; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 20:07:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by zaphod (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A001EEEB06; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 20:07:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 20:07:14 +0100 From: Christian Surchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFP: pizza-business -- a game in which you can run your own pizza business Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10 X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Fingerprint: D1E2 9A9D 1712 0E94 8671 834E 0CFF 30E1 2625 7B68 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: pizza-business Version : 1.0-beta7 Upstream Author : Tony Granberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://pizza-business.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : a game in which you can run your own pizza business Pizza Business is a game written in C++ in which you start a pizza restaurant. You, the owner, make the decisions that affect the growth (or decline) of your pizza business. You must manage a budget, hire/fire employees based on performance reports, buy tables and chairs for the restaurant, buy ovens, and buy advertisements to promote your business. The game is being targeted for multiple platforms including Windows and Linux. The game uses the wxWindows cross-platform GUI library. --- Received: (at 180789-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2004 12:11:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 02 04:11:45 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail6.mclink.it [195.110.128.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AncvY-0001uA-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 04:11:44 -0800 Received: from zaphod ([62.94.208.119]) by mail6.mclink.it (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i12CBgIU081254 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:11:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zaphod (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E756EEA06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:11:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: closing From: Christian Surchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 13:11:32 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Stalled upstream... closing this bug. thanks Christian
Bug#230775: ITP: festival-freebsoft-utils -- Festival extensions and utilities
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: festival-freebsoft-utils Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.freebsoft.org/festival-freebsoft-utils * License : GPL Description : Festival extensions and utilities Miscellaneous Festival utilities, providing especially the following features: Generalized concept of input events, including ability to play sounds within the synthesized text and to map logical input events to other events; replacing given words in the synthesized text by events; spelling; capital letter signalization; punctuation reading modes; useful Festival Scheme functions. . Primary focus of festival-freebsoft-utils is on Festival cooperation with Speech Dispatcher, but they may be used together with other speech frontends or other purposes as well.
Processed: retitle #87734 ITP: mined -- a small unicode capable editor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 87734 ITP: mined -- a small unicode capable editor Bug#87734: RFP: mined -- small unicode capable editor Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#216890: RoQA; orphaned, fails to build and run.
reassign 216890 ftp.debian.org retitle 216890 Please remove pyne thanks Emanuele Rocca pointed out on -qa that this package is currently unbuildable and fails to run. The BTS confirms this. The maintainer agreed to have the package removed. He wrote in #223684: | or even remove it from Debian? What do you think? | | I don't think anyone would miss it, FWIW. RoQA; orphaned, fails to build and run. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: RoQA; orphaned, fails to build and run.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 216890 ftp.debian.org Bug#216890: O: pyne -- A Python-GTK powered GUI mail-/newsreader Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 216890 Please remove pyne Bug#216890: O: pyne -- A Python-GTK powered GUI mail-/newsreader Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#230631: ITP: pyslide -- a tiny and powerful program to make presentations
Hi Chad, On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 09:45:02PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote: On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 02:06:48PM +, Tomas Guemes wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: pyslide Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Ayose Cazorla [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.hispalinux.es/~setepo/pyslide/ * License : GPL Description : a tiny and powerful program to make presentations How is this different from python-slides? python-slides - Python-based Slide Maker python2.1-slides - Python-based Slide Maker python2.2-slides - Python-based Slide Maker python2.3-slides - Python-based Slide Maker slides-doc - The official documentation of slides It makes animations using SDL(pygame). Just try it :) there is an i386 and a ppc version, only 30k aprox. Download it from http://www.echeide.net/debian/pyslide/; once you have installed just run pyslide /usr/share/doc/pyslide/examples/full.xml Maybe you mean that the name is very similar to python-slides? I can suggest upstream author to change the name to avoid confussion. And change the description to: Description: a tiny and powerful program to make animated presentations Greetings Tomas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#230602: ITP: logwatch -- logwatch - a log analyzer written in perl
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:55:16AM +0100, Willi Mann wrote: The report is mailed using mailx. Ugh! Why not sendmail or better a proper perl module??? -- Francesco P. Lovergine
Bug#202228: Removal of gtkgraph ?
reassign 202228 ftp.debian.org retitle 202228 Please remove gtkgraph thanks * tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-02 12:36]: Yes I agree that it should be removed immediately, particularly in light of the fact that it can produce erroneous output merely depending upon how the input is grouped. I would take a stab at fixing the bugs, but I don't know lex, and tend to agree with Aaron about better alternatives being available. OK, thanks for the quick response. RoQA; orphaned for 6 months, dead upstream, has some serious problems. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Removal of gtkgraph ?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 202228 ftp.debian.org Bug#202228: O: gtkgraph -- an interactive function-plotter/calculator Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 202228 Please remove gtkgraph Bug#202228: O: gtkgraph -- an interactive function-plotter/calculator Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#230602: ITP: logwatch -- logwatch - a log analyzer written in perl
Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:55:16AM +0100, Willi Mann wrote: The report is mailed using mailx. Ugh! Why not sendmail or better a proper perl module??? That was the decision of Kirk Bauer, not mine. Could you tell me the reason why you don't like mailx? If you give me a good reason, I'll propose a patch upstream, but I'm definitly not going to change it just for Debian, unless it's neccessary. Willi
Bug#230602: ITP: logwatch -- logwatch - a log analyzer written in perl
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 10:04:19PM +0100, Willi Mann V. wrote: Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:55:16AM +0100, Willi Mann wrote: The report is mailed using mailx. Ugh! Why not sendmail or better a proper perl module??? That was the decision of Kirk Bauer, not mine. Could you tell me the reason why you don't like mailx? If you give me a good reason, I'll propose a patch upstream, but I'm definitly not going to change it just for Debian, unless it's neccessary. Tilde escape commands in mailx for instances. Data input needs to be accurately checked to avoid abuses. That's the reason to avoid in general the use of such a command. Moreoveri, perl has different proper and powerful methods to send e-mail. There is no need to spawn a program like that. So, that's also a stylistic issue. -- Francesco P. Lovergine
Bug#230459: package wont be in Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason, this package won't be in Debian as long as mplayer is not accepted, see bug #113238. I also suggest using xmmplayer as package name. There is an unofficial package of xmmplayer from me at http://kampfwurst.net/debian/unstable/ Ciao, Bastian - -- ,''`.Bastian Kleineidam . calvin (at) debian.org : :' : `. `'GnuPG Schlüssel http://kampfwurst.net/gpgkey.txt `- Sitzt ne Kuh aufm Baum und strickt Erdbeeren. Kommt ein Polizist vorbei: Angeln verboten! Was, schon halb fünf? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAHsJ7eBwlBDLsbz4RAverAJ420+KsL+1utt77oIGGEHs6X5ZnLQCglYHq DH4XEj1KlxdAY+5NSZMxEF0= =XMOc -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Processed: closing bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 217563 Bug#217563: ITP: iptotal -- Network monitor without need for SNMP daemon 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Millis Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#218802: marked as done (ITA: ytalk -- Enhanced talk program with X support)
Your message dated Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:32:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#218802: fixed in ytalk 3.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2003 18:09:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 02 12:09:25 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.47] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AGMfF-0004iJ-00; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 12:09:25 -0600 Received: from lump.mossbank.org.uk ([81.96.65.197]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 18:09:23 + Received: from sledge.mossbank.org.uk ([10.13.0.5] ident=mail) by lump.mossbank.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGMfY-0001EM-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 18:09:44 + Received: from steve by sledge.mossbank.org.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGMfZ-0005NG-00; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 18:09:45 + Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 18:09:45 + From: Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RFA: ytalk -- Enhanced talk program with X support Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=0WGqsT62A4RTsSXf Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --0WGqsT62A4RTsSXf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-11-02 Severity: normal I haven't used ytalk in absoultely ages, and I've not been paying it much attention for a long time. There are a couple of outstanding bugs, but nothing major. Upstream seems responsive enough, but he's moved since the last time I uploaded: see http://www.iagora.com/~espel/ytalk/ytalk.html. --=20 Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] com Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/ca= fe/ --0WGqsT62A4RTsSXf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/pUhpfDt5cIjHwfcRAhHGAKCn819PcEUv5S0uDhKrwvGQZZ6lswCgqOv7 W5E34PdoMx+6esv6lwHbWLE= =oFDu -END PGP SIGNATURE- --0WGqsT62A4RTsSXf-- --- Received: (at 218802-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2004 00:34:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 02 16:34:43 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AnoWZ-0002Qv-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 16:34:43 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AnoUB-0006pB-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:32:15 -0500 From: Philipp Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#218802: fixed in ytalk 3.1.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:32:15 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Source: ytalk Source-Version: 3.1.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ytalk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ytalk_3.1.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/y/ytalk/ytalk_3.1.2-1.diff.gz ytalk_3.1.2-1.dsc to pool/main/y/ytalk/ytalk_3.1.2-1.dsc ytalk_3.1.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/y/ytalk/ytalk_3.1.2-1_i386.deb ytalk_3.1.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/y/ytalk/ytalk_3.1.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL
Bug#168579: Adopt....
Hi, I would like to adopt syscalltrack - any objections? - Adam
