Bug#252727: RFP: gimp-gap -- gimp animation package
Hi, I first created the gimp-gap packages back in May 2004 and updated it today to the newest version (2.0.2). You can retrieve it manually by going to http://www.nishra.com/debian/unstable/ or you can put this in your /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://www.nishra.com/debian/ unstable/ deb-src http://www.nishra.com/debian/ unstable/ Please beware that I have other packages in my repository that could potentially update your packages to unwanted versions. -- Emil Soleyman-Zomalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#258900: RFA: qemu -- Fast x86 Processor Emulator
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 03:28:35AM +0200, Paul Russell wrote: > I request an adopter for the qemu package. Upstream author has frequent > releases, but still beta or alpha quality; bugs require a fair bit of > attention. > > The package description is: > QEMU is a FAST! processor emulator: currently the package supports > x86 emulation. By using dynamic translation it achieves reasonable > speed while being easy to port on new host CPUs. QEMU has two > operating modes: > . > * User mode emulation: QEMU can launch Linux processes compiled for > one CPU on another CPU. > * Full system emulation: QEMU emulates a full system, including a > processor and various peripherials. It enables easier testing and > debugging of system code. It can also be used to provide virtual > hosting of several virtual PC on a single server. > . > As QEMU requires no host kernel patches to run, it is very safe and > easy to use. I'd like to take this, if nobody else gets to it first (and, if anyone else is interested, I'm sure this would be a package that could benefit from a team ...). I use it from time to time for debian-installer testing, and expect to do so much more with the new PowerMac emulation. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#258900: RFA: qemu -- Fast x86 Processor Emulator
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the qemu package. Upstream author has frequent releases, but still beta or alpha quality; bugs require a fair bit of attention. The package description is: QEMU is a FAST! processor emulator: currently the package supports x86 emulation. By using dynamic translation it achieves reasonable speed while being easy to port on new host CPUs. QEMU has two operating modes: . * User mode emulation: QEMU can launch Linux processes compiled for one CPU on another CPU. * Full system emulation: QEMU emulates a full system, including a processor and various peripherials. It enables easier testing and debugging of system code. It can also be used to provide virtual hosting of several virtual PC on a single server. . As QEMU requires no host kernel patches to run, it is very safe and easy to use. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.22 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
New Message Notification
Hey, this is Tiffany! One of my friends said she knew you and we should get in contact with each other. I just got my videocamera working so we can talk as long as you want at my website and it doesn't cost you anything if you wanna watch/see me! Just Copy and Paste the URL below in your Broswer www.TIFFHUH.com/tiffany.html I hope you visit soon... I'll be waiting for you ;-) bye bye, Tiff hostile keys bloodroot antoinette refractory importune exemplary acm percy ababa appear cause bump vouchsafe statuary siskin furtherance errand amphibology gritty dramatic amino neuter null 2
Bug#251917: package needed for Agata Report
Hola Luiz Carlos Querino Filho! El 09/07/2004 a las 10:50 escribiste: > Unfortunately, I couldn't find a Debian developer to sponsor the > packages, so I abandoned the project. If you are still looking for a sponsor you could try in #debian-devel at irc.debian.org, or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I can't help you with that, since I'm not yet a Debian Developer. Or is it that you need help with finishing the packages? In that case I would be glad to help you. Do you still have the packages you created? Would you like to upload them into a non-official repository? Or do you prefer to drop the ITP and let someone else do it? > If you want, you could try it yourself. I'll be glad to do it, but it would be better if you stayed with the project and uploaded your packages. -- Ate logo, /\/\ /\ ><
Bug#257008: marked as done (ITP: mozilla-firefox-locale-nb -- Mozilla Firefox Norwegian Bokmål Language/Region Package)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:52:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 12:56:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 05:56:39 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vawad.raw.no [129.241.93.49] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bfedi-0001On-00; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 05:56:39 -0700 Received: from wlan119.krs.hia.no ([158.36.232.119] helo=yiwaz.raw.no) by vawad.raw.no with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bfedg-0007cK-I3; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:56:37 +0200 Received: by yiwaz.raw.no (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8819496613; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:56:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:56:35 +0200 From: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: mozilla-firefox-locale-nb -- Mozilla =?iso-8859-1?Q?Firefox_?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Norwegian_Bokm=E5l?= Language/Region Package Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.62 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: mozilla-firefox-locale-nb Version : 0.9 Upstream Author : H=E5vard Mork - [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.stud.ntnu.no/~havarmor/progr/moztrans/ffox= .php * License : MPL Description : Mozilla Firefox Norwegian Bokm=E5l Language/Region Pa= ckage Norwegian Bokm=E5l Menu/Message resource and Region property package for Mozilla Firefox. =20 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=3Dno_NO, LC_CTYPE=3Dno_NO --=20 Tollef Fog Heen,'= '`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : := ' : `. = `'=20 `= - =20 --- Received: (at 257008-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:52:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:52:49 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vawad.raw.no [129.241.93.49] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjmFd-0004Zu-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:52:49 -0700 Received: from ti200710a080-0189.bb.online.no ([80.213.32.189] helo=yiwaz.raw.no) by vawad.raw.no with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1BjmFX-0004Qx-OR for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:52:47 +0200 Received: by yiwaz.raw.no (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5A02F9601F; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:52:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:52:04 +0200 From: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:24:26 +0200 Source: mozilla-firefox-locale-nb Binary: mozilla-firefox-locale-nb Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description:=20 mozilla-firefox-locale-nb - Mozilla Firefox Norwegian Bokm=C3=A5l Langua= ge/Region Package Changes:=20 mozilla-firefox-locale-nb (0.9.2-3) un
Bug#191593: marked as done (RFP: mozilla-calendar -- Standards Based Calendar Client for Mozilla)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:58:13 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Already fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2003 00:39:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 01 19:39:44 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (mantas.namai.lt) [193.219.14.141] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19BOaV-7M-00; Thu, 01 May 2003 19:39:44 -0500 Received: from mantas by mantas.namai.lt with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19BPaf-0003lU-00; Fri, 02 May 2003 03:43:58 +0200 From: Mantas Kriauciunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RFP: mozilla-calendar -- Standards Based Calendar Client for Mozilla X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 03:43:57 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Mantas Kriauciunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-02 Severity: wishlist * Package name: mozilla-calendar Version : 0.9 Upstream Author : Mike Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/ * License : LGPL, MPL Description : Standards Based Calendar Client for Mozilla Mozilla calendar is XUL based calendar application. It's integrated with Mozilla Mail - you can email alarms to any email address! Keep all your appointments in one handy electronic format, accessible from anywhere in the world. Receive reminders automatically - know your dentist appointment is near without having to tack a note onto the fridge. The calendar uses the iCal standard for storing its calendar data. You can publish events from the calendar to an FTP server or a webDAV enabled webserver. You can also use the calendar to subscribe to these events (share your calendars) as well. For documentation, FAQ, etc see home page - http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/ Please, package this wonderful software. Thanks -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mantas.namai.lt 2.4.20-k7 #1 Sat Dec 21 18:08:10 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=lt_LT, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT --- Received: (at 191593-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:58:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:58:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vawad.raw.no [129.241.93.49] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjmLZ-000534-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:58:57 -0700 Received: from ti200710a080-0189.bb.online.no ([80.213.32.189] helo=yiwaz.raw.no) by vawad.raw.no with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1BjmLU-0004XM-OY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:58:56 +0200 Received: by yiwaz.raw.no (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 743629601F; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:58:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:58:13 +0200 From: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Already fixed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: As of a little time ago, the Mozilla package in Debian has mozilla-calendar enabled and packaged in the mozilla-calendar package. It depends on the mozilla browser; if you want to avoid that, rfp the sunbird package. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 223755 ITA: python-gd -- Python interface to GD pixmap graphics > library Bug#223755: RFA: python-gd -- Python interface to GD pixmap graphics library Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#227051: marked as done (ITP: libapache2-mod-encoding -- Apache module for non-ascii filename interoperability)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:15:27 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Please close WNPP bugs properly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2004 18:46:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 10 12:44:49 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 229.9.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp (tempest.nemui.org) [219.111.9.229] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AfM4i-0005Pl-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:35:00 -0600 Received: (qmail 19331 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2004 01:34:56 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO tempest.nemui.org) (192.168.51.1) by tempest.private.nemui.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 01:34:56 +0900 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:34:55 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: libapache2-mod-encoding -- Apache module for non-ascii filename interoperability X-Debbugs-CC: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.21 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Face: %#SbsX5Ajq`)JKPGXyq8Cn6"<`&M~n\?,}`vYU7[}gM!q_K=\v6[}y8&R:Dy3O0Ymmw$@>T $Ys$^Tw8ghB'uxX)I(n_x\5RQ|s'D0m$,"I^\S X-GPG-Fingerprint: C4BC EDCC 50B2 2D7B 4A85 4A13 6CAD 85CE 4502 FDC2 X-Public-Key: http://pgp.nic.ad.jp:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4502FDC2 X-GPG-KeyID: 4502FDC2 X-Moe: Vampire/lilith MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libapache2-mod-encoding Version : 0.0.20020611a-2 Upstream Author : Kunio Miyamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL or Web page : http://webdav.todo.gr.jp/download/ * License : apache's Description : Apache module for non-ascii filename interoperability -- Tatsuki Sugiura mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 227051-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:15:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:15:28 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjlfU-0006dQ-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:15:28 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjlfT-ya-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:15:27 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:15:27 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please close WNPP bugs properly Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed" rather than closed properly. This might be because your sponsor uploaded the package in a wrong way, or because your upload was mistakenly recognizes as an NMU. Please take this into account in the future, and do close WNPP bugs properly.
Bug#258863: ITP: freepats -- Free patch set for MIDI audio synthesis
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: freepats Version : 20040611 Upstream Author : Various (freepats.opensrc.org) URL : http://freepats.opensrc.org/ License : GPL with extra rights granted Description : Free patch set for MIDI audio synthesis Freepats is a free patchset suitable for MIDI audio synthesis. It is not complete, nor comprehensive yet, and most, if not all patches are in the old and limited GUS patch format. It is, however, the sole DFSG-compliant patch set in existence so far. New patches (including those in better formats, such as SF2 SoundFont banks) are welcome. The modified GPL has this extra clause: As a special exception, if you create a composition which uses these patches, and mix these patches or unaltered portions of these patches into the composition, these patches do not by themselves cause the resulting composition to be covered by the GNU General Public License. This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why the document might be covered by the GNU General Public License. If you modify these patches, you may extend this exception to your version of the patches, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from your version. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
Bug#255129: marked as done (ITP: libapache-mod-mono -- Run ASP.NET Pages on UNIX with Apache and Mono)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:16:04 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Please close WNPP bugs properly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 22:20:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 18 15:20:54 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl-201-128-106-104.prod-infinitum.com.mx (pablo) [201.128.106.104] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BbRjC-0004rV-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:20:54 -0700 Received: from unmada by pablo with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BbRef-P0-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:16:13 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Pablo Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: libapache-mod-mono -- Run ASP.NET Pages on UNIX with Apache and Mono X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:16:12 -0500 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Pablo Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libapache-mod-mono Version : 0.11 Upstream Author : Gonzalo Paniagua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://go-mono.com and http://www.go-mono.com/asp-net.html * License : APACHE License Description : Run ASP.NET Pages on UNIX with Apache and Mono Run ASP.NET Pages on UNIX with Apache and Mono. Let the user run asp.net applications in apache with the help of mod-mono-server (in xsp package, at pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org). mod_mono is just the apache module that will be 'sending' data to mod-mono-server to compile and display asp.net applications. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3 Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=es_ES --- Received: (at 255129-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:16:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:16:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjlg4-0006kq-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:16:04 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjlg4-yk-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:16:04 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:16:04 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please close WNPP bugs properly Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed" rather than closed properly. This might be because your sponsor uploaded the package in a wrong way, or because your upload was mistakenly recognizes as an NMU. Please take this into account in the future, and do close WNPP bugs properly.
Bug#257381: marked as done (ITP: brightside -- Add reactivity to the corners and edges of your GNOME desktop)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:13:51 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package exists in the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2004 02:18:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 02 19:18:54 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.116.51] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bga7C-0008AA-00; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 19:18:54 -0700 Received: from atlantis.ccs.neu.edu ([129.10.116.41] helo=ewok) by amber.ccs.neu.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bga7A-V2-AO; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 22:18:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: brightside -- Add reactivity to the corners and edges of your GNOME desktop X-Mailer: reportbug 2.62 Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 22:18:47 -0400 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: brightside Version : 1.3.2 Upstream Author : Ed Catmur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://home.jesus.ox.ac.uk/~ecatmur/brightside/ * License : GPL Description : Add reactivity to the corners and edges of your GNOME desktop Brightside is a tool to add reactivity to the corners and edges of your Gnome desktop. Brightside provides âedge flippingâ to allow you to switch to the adjacent workspace simply by pressing your mouse against the edge of the screen. Brightside also allows you to assign configurable actions to occur while you rest the mouse in a corner of the screen. Currently available actions comprise: * Fade out volume * Prevent screensaver starting * Start screensaver and lock screen * Enter DPMS standby mode * Enter DPMS suspend mode * Enter DPMS off mode * Dim laptop backlight * Custom action - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (995, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-mm5 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA5heHwO+u47cOQDsRAvEnAJ40bqc78/f4QlfiUEkQm8a1Cuw29ACdHauR gORf2rJ/gjKBnfaNM4MWwPI= =+qU/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 257381-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:13:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:13:52 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjldw-0006U9-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:13:52 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjldv-xq-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:13:51 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:13:51 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package exists in the archive Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #257381)". Thanks. Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package, in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package seems to be in the archive now. Information about the package already
Bug#251867: marked as done (ITP: barrage -- Rather violent action game)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:10:41 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package exists in the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2004 12:39:16 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 31 05:39:16 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ip-213-17-165-190.netia.com.pl (garden) [213.17.165.190] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BUm4R-00036H-00; Mon, 31 May 2004 05:39:15 -0700 Received: by garden (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6C784B045E; Mon, 31 May 2004 14:19:54 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Rafal Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: barrage -- Rather violent action game X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 14:19:54 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: barrage Version : Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://lgames.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : Rather violent action game Barrage is a game with the objective to kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes. The player controls a gun that may either fire small or large grenades at soldiers, jeeps and tanks. It is a very simple gameplay though it is not that easy to get high scores. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6 Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL) --- Received: (at 251867-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:10:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:10:42 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjlas-0005zi-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:10:42 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjlar-xH-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:10:41 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:10:41 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package exists in the archive Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #251867)". Thanks. Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package, in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package seems to be in the archive now. Information about the package already in the archive: Package: barrage Binary: barrage Version: 1.0.1-1 Priority: optional Section: games Maintainer: Rafal Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0),libsdl1.2-dev, libsdl-mixer1.2-dev Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/b/barrage Files: c023c038ffc42929fafadc5446c2e380 601 barrage_1.0.1-1.dsc 5ed847cf05d51f80c7e49d71af7c7938 454736 barrage_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz 3b0619cf31152e183c7356a5ca93bed2 22967 barrage_1.0.1-1.diff.gz
Bug#247447: marked as done (RFP: unshield -- utility to extract InstallShield cabinet files)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:14:23 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package exist in Debian now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 07:57:16 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 05 00:57:16 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lpri.gva.es (lorenzo.cop.gva.es) [193.144.127.11] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BLHHH-0005x8-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 00:57:15 -0700 Received: from clemente (router [193.145.204.30]) by lorenzo.cop.gva.es (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id i457ua8B026346; Wed, 5 May 2004 09:56:36 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ([172.19.22.76]) by clemente; Wed, 05 May 2004 09:59:05 +0100 (WEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Cesar Martinez Izquierdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RFP: unshield -- utility to extract InstallShield cabinet files X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 09:57:27 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: unshield Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : David Eriksson (?) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://synce.sourceforge.net/synce/unshield.php * License : MIT Description : utility to extract InstallShield cabinet files Unshield is a utility to list and extract InstallShield cabinet files, which are different from M$ Cabinet files which are extracted with cabextract program. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 247447-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:14:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:14:24 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjleR-0006Wc-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:14:24 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjleR-xy-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:14:23 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:14:23 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package exist in Debian now Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: It seems that the package you have requested now exists in the Debian archive. Information about the package: Package: unshield Binary: unshield, libunshield, libunshield-dev Version: 0.3-1 Priority: optional Section: utils Maintainer: Volker Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), zlib1g-dev (>= 1.2.1) Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/u/unshield Files: 3fe5b8e3d029ae25b3ad3fc58df06be0 623 unshield_0.3-1.dsc 030fa78fb1e1f650de1122fb0bdb7f9e 222729 unshield_0.3.orig.tar.gz bbeaf254f3b0c62d647d96de817eb1d2 2668 unshield_0.3-1.diff.gz
Bug#238837: marked as done (ITP: libapache2-mod-layout -- Apache2 web page content wrapper)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:08:17 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package exists in the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2004 11:14:31 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 19 03:14:31 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 232pc232.sshunet.nl [131.211.232.232] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B4HxP-v3-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 03:14:31 -0800 Received: from haplo.sliepen.oi ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [IPv6:fec0::1:2d0:b7ff:fe18:ca14]) by xar.sliepen.oi (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id i2JBEPiA022174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:14:26 +0100 Received: from haplo.sliepen.oi ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by haplo.sliepen.oi (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id i2JBEPeL003236; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:14:25 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by haplo.sliepen.oi (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) id i2JBEOQD003235; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:14:24 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: libapache2-mod-layout -- Apache2 web page content wrapper X-Mailer: reportbug 2.53 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:14:24 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libapache2-mod-layout Version : 4.0.1a Upstream Author : Brian Aker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://tangent.org/index.pl?node_id=362 * License : BSD (but see below) Description : Apache2 web page content wrapper mod_layout allows you to create a single look and feel throughout a website without using server side includes to "automagically" wrap pages in standard headers and footers. It can be used to to add standard disclaimers to all of the pages on a server, add banner ads, etc. I already finished packaging, you can download it from ftp://sliepen.eu.org/pub/libapache2-mod-layout/. The upstream tarball does not contain licensing information, and on the upstream website I could only find the text: "You are pretty much free to use it as you please. The LICENSE is BSD (basically the same as Apache's)." See http://tangent.org/index.pl?&node_id=454. I'll mail the author and ask him to be a bit more explicit. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3 Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 --- Received: (at 238837-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:08:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:08:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjlYY-0005cY-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:08:18 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjlYX-wI-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:08:17 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:08:17 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package exists in the archive Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload with a stateme
Bug#231953: marked as done (ITP: middleman -- filtering proxy server)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:07:23 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package exists in the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 21:19:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 13:19:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AqIo3-0001qJ-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:19:04 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (lns-th2-2-82-64-28-228.adsl.proxad.net [82.64.28.228]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68890C01A; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 22:18:58 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?iso-8859-15?q?C=E9dric_Delfosse?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: middleman -- filtering proxy server X-Mailer: reportbug 2.42 Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:18:56 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: middleman Version : 1.9.1 Upstream Author : Jason McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://middle-man.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Description : filtering proxy server Middleman is a robust proxy server with many features designed to remove unwanted content, increase privacy, and to simply make surfing the Web a more pleasant experience. . Some of the highlights include: * an intuitive Web interface for configuring the proxy * banner and popup blocking * HTTP and FTP content caching * NTLM and Basic authentication when forwarding through another proxy server * regular expression substitution in downloaded files and HTTP headers * regular expression substitution on requested URLs * many URL commands to temporarily change the proxy settings or to view information about a requested file * complete support for HTTP/1.1 including persistent connections and gzip encoding . Homepage: http://middle-man.sourceforge.net Mario Peschel made a Debian package, available at: deb http://debian.twc.de/unstable/i386 ./ deb-src http://debian.twc.de/source ./ I hope to work with him to create an official Debian package, as soon as middleman 2.0 is out. Regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.0-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 231953-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:07:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:07:23 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjlXf-0005a0-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:07:23 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjlXf-w7-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:07:23 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:07:23 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package exists in the archive Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #231953)". Thanks. Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package, in whic
Bug#245692: marked as done (ITP: stratagus -- A real time strategy engine)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:09:37 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package exists in the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 18:37:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 11:37:30 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 201-1-61-246.dsl.telesp.net.br (hidrargyrum) [201.1.61.246] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHS1p-00074v-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:37:30 -0700 Received: from gpastore by hidrargyrum with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BHS1X-0001R3-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 15:37:11 -0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Guilherme de S. Pastore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: stratagus -- A real time strategy engine X-Mailer: reportbug 2.53 Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 15:37:11 -0300 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: "Guilherme de S. Pastore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: stratagus Version : 2.0 Upstream Author : Many (five) * URL : http://www.stratagus.org/ * License : GPL Description : A real time strategy engine Stratagus is a free cross-platform real-time strategy game engine, capable of playing against human or computer opponents, network or local. It can be used to build RTS games similar to C&C, WC2, AOE, and Tzar and runs under Linux and BSD. Upstream authors will be correctly listed in the package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-k7 Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 --- Received: (at 245692-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:09:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:09:38 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjlZq-0005qq-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:09:38 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjlZp-wZ-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:09:37 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:09:37 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package exists in the archive Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #245692)". Thanks. Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package, in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package seems to be in the archive now. Information about the package already in the archive: Package: stratagus Binary: stratagus Version: 2.1-1 Priority: optional Section: games Maintainer: David MartÃnez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: libglib1.2-dev, xlibs-dev (>> 4.1.0), libsdl1.2-dev (>> 1.2.2), libvorbis-dev, libpng3-dev (>= 1.2.1-2), svgalibg1-dev [i386], libbz2-dev, liblualib50-dev, debhelper (>> 4.0.0) Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/s/stratagus Files: 9d4fda441108071f194811fa52d2cfb5
Bug#224892: marked as done (ITP: cpqarrayd -- Tools to monitor smart array controllers)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:05:55 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package exists in the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2003 11:15:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 23 05:15:16 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.235] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AYjRA-0002K5-00; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 04:06:48 -0600 Received: from arven.b-one.net (cpe.atm2-0-1081170.0xc3297f86.bynxx14.customer.tele.dk [195.41.127.134]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AEE48007D; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:06:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by arven.b-one.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2DADF43539; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:03:30 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jakob Goldbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: cpqarrayd -- Tools to monitor smart array controllers X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:03:30 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: cpqarrayd Version : 2.0 Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://starbreeze.knoware.nl/~spark/compaq/ * License : GPL Description : Tools to monitor smart array controllers This tool can run on a linux based intel box with a smart array controller from HP/Compaq. It run as a daemon and polls the controller periodically and reports status changes in the disks both to the syslog and to a snmp trap host. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.4.22 #1 Fri Oct 31 09:24:19 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US --- Received: (at 224892-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:05:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:05:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjlWG-0005Tw-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:05:56 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjlWF-vh-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:05:55 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:05:55 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package exists in the archive Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #224892)". Thanks. Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package, in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package seems to be in the archive now. Information about the package already in the archive: Package: cpqarrayd Binary: cpqarrayd Version: 2.0-1 Priority: extra Section: admin Maintainer: Matt Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), kernel-source-2.4, libsnmp5-dev Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/c/cpqarrayd Files: 9f99d8dfee0b56bba2fa9b248f1123e7 596 cpqarrayd_2.0-1.dsc 3616a66449c80d9b0f0da8c0b9f25182 84523 cpqarrayd_2.0.orig.tar.gz 310e8abb080783be3ce87433150aa072 50865 cpqarrayd_2.0-1.diff.gz
Bug#254958: marked as done (ITP: prj2make-sharp -- Convert VS.NET solution files to makefiles)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:12:29 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package exists in the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2004 23:19:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 17 16:19:22 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl-201-128-106-104.prod-infinitum.com.mx (pablo) [201.128.106.104] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bb6AE-0004XB-00; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:19:22 -0700 Received: from unmada by pablo with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bb65h-00083j-00; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:14:41 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Pablo Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: prj2make-sharp -- Convert VS.NET solution files to makefiles X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:14:36 -0500 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Pablo Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_40,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: prj2make-sharp Version : 0.95 Upstream Author : Francisco "Paco" Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/project/?prj2make-sharp * License : GPL Description : Convert VS.NET solution files to makefiles This is a GTK# application that runs on Linux and Windows (if configured with GTK#). The app can read a solution file produced with Visual Studio .NET and later can generate a makefile suitable for compilation with csc.exe. Is part of the process of pkg-mono group: http://pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org Run in Mono. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3 Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=es_ES --- Received: (at 254958-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:12:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:12:30 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjlcb-0006Lu-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:12:30 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjlcb-xZ-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:12:29 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:12:29 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package exists in the archive Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #254958)". Thanks. Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package, in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package seems to be in the archive now. Information about the package already in the archive: Package: prj2make-sharp Binary: prj2make-sharp Version: 0.95-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Debian Mono Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), mono-mcs | c-sharp-compiler, mono-utils (>> 1.0) Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.6.0 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/p/prj2make-sharp Files: 7401837ea4ec19d4f05632cf794ecf98 740 prj2make-sharp_0.95-1.dsc a807890f0a3c07deb5d727d1f0ad70c4 317738 prj2make-sh
Bug#256378: marked as done (ITP: upgrade-system -- The Debian system upgrader from Konflux)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:13:00 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package exists in the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2004 16:42:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 26 09:42:33 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from korppi.suomicommunications.com [217.119.36.25] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BeGG9-0003Hu-00; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 09:42:33 -0700 Received: from route.intranet (gw-5.suomicom.fi [217.30.187.5]) by korppi.suomicommunications.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/SC) with ESMTP id i5QGglRt018579; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 19:42:47 +0300 Received: from omena.intranet ([172.16.1.14] ident=q-funk) by route.intranet with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BeGH2-eL-00; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 19:43:28 +0300 Received: by omena.intranet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 26 Jun 2004 19:42:26 +0300 From: "Martin-Ãric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: upgrade-system -- The Debian system upgrader from Konflux X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 19:42:26 +0300 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by korppi.suomicommunications.com id i5QGglRt018579 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: upgrade-system Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Martin Zdrahal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin-=C9= ric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://funkyware.konflux.at/ * License : GPL Description : The Debian system upgrader from Konflux Upgrade-system offers a convenient way to keep a Debian system up-to-dat= e, yet free from accumulated obsolete libraries. . It is particularly useful on systems that mix packages from different releases (stable/testing/unstable) and on desktop systems where packages are frequently installed or removed according to evolving user tastes. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-imac Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 256378-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 21:13:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 14:13:01 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjld7-0006Pj-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:13:01 -0700 Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjld6-xg-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:13:00 -0600 Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:13:00 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package exists in the archive Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: It seems that this package already exists in the archive. If you have uploaded the package yourself but forgotten to close this WNPP bug, please read the instructions at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp for handling WNPP bugs properly. You should close WNPP bugs in your initial upload with a statement like "Initial upload. (Closes: #256378)". Thanks. Of course, it might also be that someone else uploading this package, in which case the statements above don't apply -- in any case, the package seems to be in the archive now. Information about the package already in the archive: Package: upgrade-system Binary: upgrade-system Versi
Bug#236690: rzip Debian package ready
Hi Stephen, I re-preped the rzip package and put it on the web [1] and uploaded it to the mentors.debian.net repository [2]. The package conforms to the latest policy and is both lintian and linda clean. I've installed it on a few systems and have had no troubles. rzip doesn't look to be in anything resembling rapid development, but I am actively using it and am more than willing to maintain it. Thanks again for offering to upload this and let me know if I overlooked anything! Alec Berryman [1] http://www.thened.net/~alec/stuff/debian/rzip/ [2] http://mentors.debian.net/usage.php
Re: Bug#258746: ITP: nufw -- NuFW, an Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
Hi, > Could you make your description more precise and move theoretical > words to the end of the description? I think that most users will stop > reading in the middle of this paragraph because they will be tired of > general words. > > Upstream Author : Eric Leblond, Vincent Deffontaines > > * URL : http://www.example.org/ Sorry, I open this ITP a bit too fast... The URL is http://www.nufw.org. Moreover you'll find a better description, and more information on it. -- Jean-Michel Kelbert signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#251867: This should be closed
When you uploaded barrage into the archive you didn't close this ITP, instead you closed 249745.
Processed: reassign RFP for gil to wnpp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 138659 wnpp Bug#138659: RFP: gil -- GTK ISDN Launcher Bug reassigned from package `isdnutils-xtools' to `wnpp'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#256685: ITA: linuxlogo
On Sunday 11 July 2004 12:47, Marius Kotsbak wrote: > > Please Marius tell me, if you still want to package it, I can retitle the > > bug then. > > I am working on packaging it. I have imported the newest upstream > release and it seems to work, I just have to test it a little more and > check if the package follows the policy. > > What is this about really? Which bug? In the debian bug tracking system there is a bug open, because linuxlogo was orphaned. I retitled the bug that I wanted to package linuxlogo. This is the usual way to claim the "right" to package it. The maintainer who filed this bug also mentioned that he knows that you wanted to package it. After a few days there was still no "ITA" (intend to adopt) the package from you. So I did it. Now we have the situation, that I claimed rights for it, but you have already a package. So I suggest, that you retitle the bug again! And go on packaging it. But I will be watching and take over, if there is no package in the near future. Is this OK? Please tell me your plans! Oliver
Bug#258746: ITP: nufw -- NuFW, an Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
Jean-Michel, Jean-Michel Kelbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Description : NuFW, an Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux > > Users have always been the core of companies. It is also true at the > network level and this is more and more true with the increase of > mobility and the spreading of multi users operating systems. But > classical packets filtering systems still forget about users and only > care about IP adresses. Could you make your description more precise and move theoretical words to the end of the description? I think that most users will stop reading in the middle of this paragraph because they will be tired of general words. > > NuFW gives back users the place they deserve. It is an authenticating > gateway, which means that connections are authenticated before being > forwarded through the gateway. > > The daemons currently run on Linux and software clients are available > for Windows and Linux. > Peter. -- Antispam protection: don't remove_these_lines_if you're not in my whitelist (replying first time). If you do, you'll have to make additional operation replying your own reply (and getting in my non-spammers whitelist). Sorry for inconvenience.
Re: Bug#258746: ITP: nufw -- NuFW, an Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jean-Michel Kelbert wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: nufw > Version : 0.8.0 > Upstream Author : Eric Leblond, Vincent Deffontaines > * URL : http://www.example.org/ ^^^ you missed this Cheers, Cristian
Bug#256969: marked as done (ITP: postgrey -- Greylisting implementation for Postfix)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:11:53 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line upload accepted has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 08:40:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 01:40:27 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zbasel.fortytwo.ch [212.254.206.135] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bfadn-0003Ns-00; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:40:27 -0700 Received: from pc-4514.ethz.ch (pc-4514.ethz.ch [129.132.57.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "pc-4514.ethz.ch", Issuer "fortytwo.ch CA certificate" (verified OK)) by zbasel.fortytwo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B735AF; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:40:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pc-4514.ethz.ch (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E1E5925DA10; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RFP: postgrey -- Greylisting implementation for Postfix X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:40:24 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Since greylistd seems to be exim-centric, and the greylist script included with postfix has some issues (according to postgrey's homepage) * Package name: postgrey Version : 1.11 Upstream Author : David Schweikert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/ * License : GPL Description : Greylisting implementation for Postfix A policy server implementation for postfix 2.1 implementing greylisting. Greylisting means that you reject email from a server on the first try, using the fact that most spammers do not retry to send their email, whereas most normal mail servers do. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (60, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481 iKcEARECAGcFAkDifHhgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJECqqZti935l6m+QAn31HEXyJxPohbZdfLSL1cZBe +roGAJ0cwLCFxouUbmy1k+Lgi/wz0Cz/jQ== =vzIF -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 256969-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 12:12:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 05:12:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjdBa-0006uU-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:12:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1]) by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 28375A613 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:11:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by albatross.madduck.net (postfix, from userid 1000) id DDE484B9E; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:11:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:11:53 +0200 From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: upload accepted Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Debian GNU/Linux X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 kernel 2.6.7-albatross i686 X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin' X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bug
Bug#258771: ITP: libxslt-ruby1.8: ruby class for processing XSLT, based on libxslt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libxslt-ruby1.8 Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Author : Gregoire Lejeune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.webtime-project.net/ruby-xslt/ * License : GPL Description : libxslt-ruby1.8: ruby class for XSLT processing XSLT/Ruby is a ruby class that provides a wrapper XSLT processing. It's based on libxml and libxslt, and is very easy to use (the class, that is; not XSLT itself ;) See http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt for more information about XSLT itself. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Bug#228073: marked as done (ITA: psqlodbc -- ODBC support for PostgreSQL)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 07:32:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#228073: fixed in psqlodbc 1:07.03.0200-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2004 12:43:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 16 06:43:21 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (SpeedMailer.intranet.fbn-dd.de) [195.227.105.178] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AhTJo-0005Aq-00; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:43:21 -0600 Received: from server1.intranet.fbn-dd.de (192-168-0-1.transfer-000.intranet.fbn-dd.de [192.168.0.1]) by SpeedMailer.intranet.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3DEAFF57; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:43:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.intranet.fbn-dd.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id i0GCehe17581; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:40:43 +0100 Received: from donald.balu5 (10-28-130-200.intranet-28-130.fbn-dd.de [10.28.130.200]) by server1.intranet.fbn-dd.de (AvMailGate-2.0.1.1) id 17562-55FEC409; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:40:29 +0100 Received: from martin by donald.balu5 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AhTFI-00019S-00; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:38:40 +0100 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:38:40 +0100 From: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Subject: RFA: odbc-postgresql -- ODBC support for PostgreSQL Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.37 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-AntiVirus: OK! AntiVir MailGate Version 2.0.1.1; AVE: 6.23.0.2; VDF: 6.23.0.32 at server1 has not found any known virus in this email. Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hello everybody! Currently odbc-postgresql is built as part of the postgresql source package. But we want to split off ancillary packages like this one because of big architectural changes that will be made in the postgresql package and because no maintainer actually uses ODBC. It is not very hard to maintain and it just has 3 open bugs (2 are a bit more tricky, though). I already checked that it builds without problems as a separate source package (i. e. without the postgresql source tree). If somebody actually uses ODBC with postgresql and is interested in it, then please contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I set reply-to to this address), by writing a bug followup or at d-devel. Thanks in advance and have a nice day! Martin (PostgreSQL comaintainer) p. p. Oliver Elphick --=20 Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAB9tPDecnbV4Fd/IRAuYNAKCkPv8e2dbjohDX/ul2KkkjEJnODQCgpwYr Lo66nGKWGX23VeEyznJyHPQ= =g2aB -END PGP SIGNATURE- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- --- Received: (at 228073-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 11:38:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 04:38:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjceg-0004IR-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 04:38:02 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjcYv-0007Yz-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 07:32:05 -0400 From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Su
Bug#256685: ITA: linuxlogo
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 11:44:46PM +0200, Oliver Korff wrote: > Hello Flo, hello Marius, > > I didn't ask Marius because there was plenty of time to send an ITA, I am > sorry about this. > > Please Marius tell me, if you still want to package it, I can retitle the bug > then. I am working on packaging it. I have imported the newest upstream release and it seems to work, I just have to test it a little more and check if the package follows the policy. What is this about really? Which bug? Marius Kotsbak pgp6bv4nPM1bE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#258746: ITP: nufw -- NuFW, an Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: nufw Version : 0.8.0 Upstream Author : Eric Leblond, Vincent Deffontaines * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : GPL Description : NuFW, an Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux Users have always been the core of companies. It is also true at the network level and this is more and more true with the increase of mobility and the spreading of multi users operating systems. But classical packets filtering systems still forget about users and only care about IP adresses. NuFW gives back users the place they deserve. It is an authenticating gateway, which means that connections are authenticated before being forwarded through the gateway. The daemons currently run on Linux and software clients are available for Windows and Linux. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Jean-Michel Kelbert signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: [owner@bugs.debian.org: Bug#245886 acknowledged by developer (Bug#245886: fixed in console-tools 1:0.2.3dbs-53)]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 245886 Bug#245886: ITP: iaxclient -- Voice over IP (IAX) client for the Asterisk Software PBX Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#258742: ITP: libclass-accessor-chained-perl -- make chained accessors
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libclass-accessor-chained-perl Version : 0.01 Upstream Author : Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~rclamp/Class-Accessor-Chained/ * License : Artistic and GPL Description : make chained accessors A chained accessor is one that always returns the object when called with parameters (to set), and the value of the field when called with no arguments. . This module subclasses Class::Accessor in order to provide the same mk_accessors interface. . This description was automagically extracted from the module by dh-make-perl. This module is a dependency of libmodule-depends-perl that I missed first time around: bug to be filed against libmodule-depends-perl now... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.23-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Bug#256018: marked as done (ITP: libfile-chdir-perl -- A more sensible way to change directories)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:59:35 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Uploaded, done. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2004 12:28:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 24 05:28:30 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from puffbird.pelicanmanufacturing.com.au (pelicanmanufacturing.com.au) [203.59.220.18] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BdTLB-Wy-00; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:28:30 -0700 Received: from phobe.internal.pelicanmanufacturing.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pelicanmanufacturing.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id i5OCSHw2009344; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:28:17 +0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by phobe.internal.pelicanmanufacturing.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i5OCSGjX009342; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:28:16 +0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ITP: libfile-chdir-perl -- A more sensible way to change directories X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:28:16 +0800 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libfile-chdir-perl Version : 0.06 Upstream Author : Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-chdir/ * License : Artistic Description : A more sensible way to change directories Perl's chdir() has the unfortunate problem of being very, very, very global. If any part of your program calls chdir() or if any library you use calls chdir(), it changes the current working directory for the whole program. . This sucks. . File::chdir gives you an alternative, $CWD and @CWD. These two variables combine all the power of chdir(), File::Spec and Cwd. Note: this is being packaged as a dependancy of libmodule-depends-perl. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.23-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 256018-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 09:59:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 02:59:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from puffbird.pelicanmanufacturing.com.au (pelicanmanufacturing.com.au) [203.59.220.18] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bjb7X-0006co-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 02:59:44 -0700 Received: from phobe.internal.pelicanmanufacturing.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pelicanmanufacturing.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id i6B9xZF3011039 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:59:35 +0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by phobe.internal.pelicanmanufacturing.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i6B9xZqm011037 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:59:35 +0800 X-Authentication-Warning: phobe.internal.pelicanmanufacturing.com.au: james set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:59:35 +0800 From: James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Uploaded, done. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline This package is in the archive. --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposi
Bug#249717: marked as done (ITA: vrfy -- Verify electronic mail addresses.)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2004 02:47:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249717: fixed in vrfy 990522-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2004 22:56:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 18 15:56:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BQDVE-0004Qv-00; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:56:04 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id C716564D3D; Tue, 18 May 2004 22:56:03 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 67EBB10032; Tue, 18 May 2004 23:54:57 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 23:54:57 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: O: vrfy -- Verify electronic mail addresses. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: normal The current maintainer of vrfy, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, has orphaned this package. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly. Some information about this package: Package: vrfy Binary: vrfy Version: 990522-2 Priority: optional Section: mail Maintainer: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.5.5 Format: 1.0 Directory: pool/main/v/vrfy Files: c2e26415960a3a58ede239bd404f5592 644 vrfy_990522-2.dsc 16ed4b53e1603d752d2a381ce952811b 36543 vrfy_990522.orig.tar.gz a44241b66dbacefe2badfebda9ef 2638 vrfy_990522-2.diff.gz Package: vrfy Priority: optional Section: mail Installed-Size: 92 Maintainer: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i386 Version: 990522-2 Replaces: netstd (<< 3.07-3) Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.3-7) Filename: pool/main/v/vrfy/vrfy_990522-2_i386.deb Size: 22956 MD5sum: 373157d38b1e8ee97b9ccbda45925ac9 Description: Verify electronic mail addresses. 'vrfy' is a tool to verify e-mail addresses and mailing lists. In its simplest form it takes an address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", figures out the MX hosts for "domain", and issues the SMTP command VRFY at the primary MX host (optionally all), or at "domain" itself if no MX hosts exist. Without "domain" it goes to "localhost". . More complex capabilities are: * recursively expanding forward files or mailing lists, * detecting mail forwarding loops, * understanding full-blown RFC822 address specifications, * syntax checking that can be carried out either locally or remotely, * various options provided to exploit alternative protocol suites if necessary, and to print many forms of verbose output. . Obvious limitations exist (mostly due to a lousy VRFY command implementation on some hosts), but otherwise, it works pretty well. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 249717-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 06:49:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 10 23:49:34 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjY9W-0004eS-00; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 23:49:34 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjY75-Eo-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 02:47:03 -0400 From: Mark Suter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#249717: fixed in vrfy 990522-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 02:47:03 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: vr
Bug#258709: O: t-gnus -- A branch of Semi-gnus (Gnus for SEMI) variants.
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I retire from maintaining this package. Description: A branch of Semi-gnus (Gnus for SEMI) variants. Semi-gnus is a replacement of Gnus with gnus-mime for SEMI. It has all features of Gnus and gnus-mime, so there are no need to install Gnus to use it, and you must not use gnus-mime for SEMI. It requires SEMI package, so please get and install SEMI package before to install it. . Use T-gnus in offline(Unplugged) status using gnus-offline. T-gnus have also features that have Semi-gnus MainTrunk. Enable to get Multiple Pop server in POP and APOP using pop3-fma.el (pop3 For Multi Account). By Tatsuya Ichikawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. . T-gnus is one of Semi-gnus variants. Now, "Semi-gnus" is generic name of Gnus for SEMI.
Bug#258708: O: ppxp -- Yet another PPP program.
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I retire from maintaining this package. Description: Yet another PPP program. PPxP is a user process ppp program which will use a kernel or user netlink driver. It provides an easy setup, easy connecting (qdial), dial on demand, IP masquerading (experimental) IP filtering, DNS relay and many other features. Of course, it can also be used as a ppp server. . This package includes the standard CUI (Character User Interface) console.
