Bug#520324: ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google based on the WebKit engine
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:17:59PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:02:09PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: Yeah, in any case we might want to get this in experimental/unstable so we get a feeling how this can be maintained. Also having this beast NEWed is probably a good start ;). It's in Debian unstable since half a year: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libv/libv8.html and yes, for now chromium-browser will use its libv8 and i dont have plans for uploading the standalone package until that has stabilized. Is the Chrome version of libv8 forked from the version of v8 in the archive? no, but libv8 is getting bumped too quickly to use the system lib. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100506160517.ga7...@jwsdot.com
Bug#520324: ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google based on the WebKit engine
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:41:50PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: Il 22/04/2010 12:25, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto: Regarding security issues, I duly notice that Giuseppe is a full member of the Debian security team, so I believe we should trust his judgement on that. webkit related security issues are real and I'm well placed to know about it. I would like to hear Giuseppe about his concerns wrt this point. Sure, I just meant to highlight that he's probably more qualified than other people (surely more than me for instance) to judge on this. I do hope he has already thought about it :), but it would indeed be nice if he can share his opinions here. We are already tracking[1] chromium security issues, this is another webkit fork and it is a real pain; but given the fact that now we have three members in the webkit security groups (Fathi is one of them), from the Security team's (CCed) point of view there is no objections. Alexander Sack wrote: One example: If you look at the release channels, you will notice that there are two releases a week in average or something. Not real releases,tags or anything like that. The problem here is that chromium uses a continuous rollout and backout approach, which is fine on its own, but when it comes to reflecting this in a distro you easily become trapped to either keep up with their update frequency through the security channel :-P (e.g. going through security twice a week ;)) ... or somehow figuring how to bake stable releases from a continuous head in a way that you can release regression free security updates as those are announced. I am not saying there is no way to do that, just that its tough and we have to learn a lot before we can consider putting chromium in a stable release for debian. After a quick look to their release blog, I noted a lot of announcement for the dev tree, but not for the stable tree. Anyway could you explain your plans for chromium in Debian please? When do you intend to upload it in unstable or experimental? BTW, yesterday I uploaded gyp. FWIW, I concur with Alexander Sack. We should not yet include Chromium in Squeeze. Let's give it some time to settle down and observe if it's actually maintainable. The issues raised by both Alexander and Tom Callaway of Fedora seem very credible to me. If Chromium in Squeeze+1 can be build with the system copy of webkit, that's an added bonus. Likewise, we shouldn't include libv8 yet (or exclude it from security support). Yeah, in any case we might want to get this in experimental/unstable so we get a feeling how this can be maintained. Also having this beast NEWed is probably a good start ;). and yes, for now chromium-browser will use its libv8 and i dont have plans for uploading the standalone package until that has stabilized. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100426110209.gd29...@jwsdot.com
Bug#520324: ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google based on the WebKit engine
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:03:47PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote: We are already tracking[1] chromium security issues, this is another webkit fork and it is a real pain; but given the fact that now we have three members in the webkit security groups (Fathi is one of them), from the Security team's (CCed) point of view there is no objections. good to know. BTW, yesterday I uploaded gyp. Thanks and already accepted (interesting to see some packages can go fast ;) I guess nothing prevent to upload a package to experimental now. OK, I will make this happen over weekend. Will add Guiseppe as an Uploader ... please contribute directly to our branches in launchpad from here on. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100423114235.ga2...@jwsdot.com
Bug#520324: ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google based on the WebKit engine
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:49:29PM +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote: Hello Thanks for adding gyp into sid so far. Many Debian users prefers to use Google Chrome repository. I'm not sure many Debian users prefer to use non-debian repositories. For me and our users it's definitely not the case, we prefer to use Debian repositories exclusively, and our own where we add other packages that are not available in Debian ourselves. Simply because we rely and need Debian security updates in some managed (monitored with hobbit, and manually checked if all went fine) for our well over a hundred workstations. I agree, that we want chromium in archive ... having external solutions only is not in the spirit of debian imo. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100423143025.gd2...@jwsdot.com
Bug#520324: ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google based on the WebKit engine
owner 520324 a...@debian.org thanks On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:14:59PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: owner 520324 ! thanks Il 27/03/2010 17:14, Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto: Hi Alexander, Il 26/03/2010 12:24, Alexander Sack ha scritto: Just pull and build the ubuntu package. Is there a specific reason why you (Chromium team) uploaded chromium-browser in Ubuntu two months ago and not yet in Debian? Cheers, Giuseppe. I don't received any answer, so I'm going to take over this ITP in order to get chromium-browser in time for squeeze. I requested an alioth group, feel free to join it when it will be accepted. Dude, The problem is that chromium browser cannot be maintained in a debian stable relase as it is. If you think different talk to me on IRC. Let's wait how bad it blows up once ubuntu lucid enters stable release mode. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100422011256.ga11...@jwsdot.com
Bug#520324: ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google based on the WebKit engine
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:12:56AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:14:59PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: I don't received any answer, so I'm going to take over this ITP in order to get chromium-browser in time for squeeze. I requested an alioth group, feel free to join it when it will be accepted. Dude, The problem is that chromium browser cannot be maintained in a debian stable relase as it is. If you think different talk to me on IRC. Let's wait how bad it blows up once ubuntu lucid enters stable release mode. Just for the record, I don't want to stand in anyones way; however, the package is as ready as it can be; the problem is really on upstream release process. It's completely unclear when to release and what to release and that is what we are trying out in ubuntu lucid. Most likely we will get out of this that we need to work with upstream on something better. One example: If you look at the release channels, you will notice that there are two releases a week in average or something. Not real releases,tags or anything like that. The problem here is that chromium uses a continuous rollout and backout approach, which is fine on its own, but when it comes to reflecting this in a distro you easily become trapped to either keep up with their update frequency through the security channel :-P (e.g. going through security twice a week ;)) ... or somehow figuring how to bake stable releases from a continuous head in a way that you can release regression free security updates as those are announced. I am not saying there is no way to do that, just that its tough and we have to learn a lot before we can consider putting chromium in a stable release for debian. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100422012806.gb11...@jwsdot.com
Bug#520324: ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google based on the WebKit engine
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:38:52PM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote: Just pull and build the ubuntu package. Thanks. It seems Ubuntu package doesn't build as is. gyp doesn't exist in Debian. timeout is provided by coreutils package. right ... gyp needs to get in too!! FTA probably could help getting that in. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100407090624.gg6...@jwsdot.com
Bug#520324: ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google based on the WebKit engine
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:15:56AM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote: Hi, Could you give us en ETA of the ITP ? Can we have unofficial packages while waiting for the official upload ? seconded. Otherwise, you could give us some quick steps to build our own packages :) Just pull and build the ubuntu package. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100326112402.gd1...@jwsdot.com
Bug#570853: ITP: ntrack -- lightweight connectivity tracking library
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alexander Sack a...@debian.org * Package name: ntrack Version : 006 * URL : https://launchpad.net/ntrack * License : LGPL 3 (or later) Programming Lang: C, C++, Python Description : lightweight connectivity tracking library -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100221212918.5825.61367.report...@localhost.localdomain
Bug#520324: thanks a lot for chromium packaging work!
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 01:26:23PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: we are making progress on this. the latest bzr branch has a licensecheck.pl that generates dep-5 file copyright. Hi Alexander, just a big THANK YOU for the ongoing work on the chromium-browser packaging, of course that extends from you to all other people who contributed. I'm eager to play with the browser and I thought a supportive message would be better than nothing :-) Do you have any ETA for when the package will be available in unstable? Do you plan to ship it with squeeze? The upload will happen soon ... i am not sure it will go through NEW, but the things I thought were issues seems to be not ... so we will try as it is ... - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520324: Any news on this? :)
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:40:48PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote: On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: Only blocking issues are that there are some subtrees licensed GPL or LGPL without any version info given; while those need to be GPLv2 or later in order to have a chance to be compatible with Apache 2.0. The GPL and LGPL when specified with no license version restriction explicitly allow the recipient to use any version ever published by the FSF. So this is not a problem. curious ... is that written in the GPL itself? - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520324: Any news on this? :)
Well ... check out our current package in the chromium-daily ppa ... thats the progress we are making. feel free to help on the licensing issues left - which is a huge effort still imo ... the upstream bug on this is here: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28291 On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:15:41PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Copying Alexander Sack to your question: * Guido Trotter ultrot...@debian.org [2009-11-17 10:42]: Hi, Any news on this? Otherwise it might be wise to retitle as RFP. (I will do this in 7 days, if the package is not uploaded, or there is no further comment regarding this on the bug). Thanks, Guido - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#469906: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#469906: Can I take care of it?
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 04:15:37PM +0400, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alexander Gerasiov g...@debian.org I've took a look at Philippe's work. It really looks hard-hacked inside. It's also outdated a lot. So I rewrite package based on scrapbook package. Here it is: http://vice.gq.net.ru/staff/flashblock It nobody raise against, I'd like to maintain it under debian pkg-mozext team. Would you mind using mozilla-devscripts? CCed Andrea who can probably help on that. Actually ... maybe we already did that in ubuntu/branches? Andrea? - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#546583: Bug#546616: connman: Please provide development files like connman.pc and header files
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: retitle 546583 RFP: gconnman -- GObject binding of the Connman D-Bus API noowner 546583 thanks oh ... you were the owner ... would you be willing to join a connman team? - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#546587: ITP: modemmanager - D-Bus service for managing modems
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: modemmanager Version : git Upstream Author : Freedesktop/NetworkManager Team * URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ModemManager/ModemManager/ * License : GPL Description : D-Bus service for managing modems - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#546593: ITP: modemmanager - D-Bus service for managing modems
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: modemmanager Version : git Upstream Author : Freedesktop/NetworkManager Team * URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ModemManager/ModemManager/ * License : GPL Description : D-Bus service for managing modems - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#545155: ITP: carrick - mutter based network management UI for connman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: carrick Version : git Upstream Author : Moblin - http://moblin.org/ * URL : http://git.moblin.org/cgit.cgi/carrick-ng/ * License : GPL Package : http://kbtin.sf.net/debian/ Description : mutter based network management UI for connman Will be maintained within the ubuntu network-manager team - https://launchpad.net/~network-manager - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#545156: ITP: network-manager-netbook - mutter based network management frontend for network-manager
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: network-manager-netbook Version : git Upstream Author : GNOME NetworkManager - http://git.gnome.org * URL : http://git.gnome.org/cgit/network-manager-netbook/ * License : GPL Description : ITP: network-manager-netbook - mutter based network management frontend for network-manager Will be maintained by the ubuntu network-manager team + https://launchpad.net/~network-manager - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520324: ITP: chromium -- A web browser developed by Google based on the WebKit engine
owner 520324 a...@debian.org thanks No response on my offer to take over ITP and no progress on this ITP. Taking over ownership. Will work with/as part of the chromium-team in launchpad to get this package into debian. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#475022: When this package will upload into debian?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:02:58AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Alexander Sack a...@debian.org [2009.07.21.2312 +0200]: Upstream seems to be in quite impressive release frequency atm, they release every other day. We will probably package up 0.30 tomorrow, so if you can wait, I can upload 0.30 or 0.31 (if that happens till tomorrow :)). I'll wait since I am dying to go to bed. Send me the link to the .dsc file when you're done. Here the latest and greatest (though i guess we will get 0.40 in a week ;)). http://people.debian.org/~asac/connman/connman_0.30+git.1.5b69740e1+dfsg-1.dsc - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#475022: When this package will upload into debian?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:26:37AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Alexander Sack a...@debian.org [2009.07.22.1050 +0200]: Here the latest and greatest (though i guess we will get 0.40 in a week ;)). http://people.debian.org/~asac/connman/connman_0.30+git.1.5b69740e1+dfsg-1.dsc Let's get it through NEW first. A few comments. Note that I am neither a mentor for you, nor someone who imposes preferences through sponsorship, but I do like to put care into packages. Thus, the following comments are not criticisms and because that's how I do things is an acceptable answer in all cases. That's ok. I could definitly be more loving about packaging details :). However, suggestions welcome! - /usr/lib/connman/scripts/dhclient* should really go to /usr/share, don't you think? Yes, thats probably the accurate place to ship it, but i never saw the point for going through maintenance overhead if the amount of files isn't significant enough and they are not shipped in an arch all -common package at all. - any reason you didn't use debhelper to install/remove/invoke the initrd scripts? Out of habits I would think. Also I felt more comfortable to implement what it does than to buy some magic. - Is it intentional that you have Debian/Ubuntu addresses as maintainer/uploader? That's basically a work vs. spare time conflict I try to avoid. Most time I put into connman is done during my worktime so I decided to keep the credits there. - http://moblin.org/projects/connection-manager is the homepage, not just moblin.org, right? You are absolutely right. When i started this package there was no real clear direction upstream and they changed their homepage a few times now. The new and hopefully final homepage is http://connman.net/ Filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402998 - Is there a Vcs-Browser? ATM, you should be able to just go to the Vcs-Bzr location with a browser. You can use the same url for branching and the web. Anyway, I will think about splitting it up in future. Filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402999 - does the short description have to mention Intel? - I'd change the capitalisation. - Maybe the long description could be rephrased to be a little bit more Debian-centric? After all, this is for Debian/Ubuntu, not Moblin, right? I used the description published by Moblin at the time I did the initial package. This has changed now so we could update short and long description based on what is on connman.net. I don't consider myself an outstanding package description author, so please go ahead and submit text snippets suitable; but dont go for a too debian/ubuntu centric approach as there are more unnamed downstreams that might want to reuse our package description. ;). Filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403001 - The Standards-Version is up to 3.8.2 I think. Right, I am usually lame about standard versions. - nice work on debian/copyright. I still prefer the old format, but I can see how this is beneficial. - How does your version numbering scheme work? 0.30+git.1.5b69740e1 Have you considered just using the git-describe output, like I did e.g. for mdadm: 3.0~devel3-43-g2800528-1 the used scheme is basically implemented in debian/rules ... it allows you to do snapshots and tags. We use some variant of that approach in other packages as well. I haven't checked git-describe, but I am not sure how feasible that is as we regularly package up git snapshots that have no tags. I'll upload tonight, whether I hear from you or not. Thanks, - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#475022: When this package will upload into debian?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 02:36:51PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Alexander Sack a...@debian.org [2009.07.20.1429 +0200]: Yes, I can upload it later today. The bad news is that the applet was abandoned upstream - at least for now as they focus on mutter/netbook applet called carrick. I think it's way more important to concentrate on the core first. Applets and anything else GUI are totally secondary in my world. Let's get connman working on Debian on the command-line and then let people write applets if they want. Also i believe that the NEW queue will take a time, but maybe debconf can make that happen too. I will be in #debian-devel all the time if there are problems with the review etc. and follwoing up swiftly would help. Will you be there? I am sure I can help by bribing someone when I arrive on the 25th. I had hope that the debian system would come up, but it didnt for 24h now so I cannot reach my machine until Thu late at night - which is when i could do this at first. If you would be willing to sponsor ;), I can prepare source packages though. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#475022: When this package will upload into debian?
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 03:16:01PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Alexander Sack a...@debian.org [2009.07.21.1512 +0200]: I had hope that the debian system would come up, but it didnt for 24h now so I cannot reach my machine until Thu late at night - which is when i could do this at first. If you would be willing to sponsor ;), I can prepare source packages though. Sure I could do that. Recent snapshot post 0.23 is available from http://people.debian.org/~asac/connman/ Upstream seems to be in quite impressive release frequency atm, they release every other day. We will probably package up 0.30 tomorrow, so if you can wait, I can upload 0.30 or 0.31 (if that happens till tomorrow :)). But feel free to play with this and check if you have anything - let me know. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#475022: When this package will upload into debian?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:32:29PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Alexander Sack a...@debian.org [2009.07.12.1044 +0200]: I uploaded it two month ago or something like that; it got rejected because of licensing glitches; that should be fixed in bzr for a while; i should really reupload it; maybe today :)! It would be nice if you could upload the latest connman before DebConf starts on Friday. Yes, I can upload it later today. The bad news is that the applet was abandoned upstream - at least for now as they focus on mutter/netbook applet called carrick. Also i believe that the NEW queue will take a time, but maybe debconf can make that happen too. I will be in #debian-devel all the time if there are problems with the review etc. and follwoing up swiftly would help. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#475022: When this package will upload into debian?
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 07:42:04PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: Hi Alexander, I am working on LXDE. It seems this package would be a good replacement for non-finished lxnm currently. And it seems two months past already after you said you will upload this into debian ASAP. Does any pending problem to upload it to debian? I uploaded it two month ago or something like that; it got rejected because of licensing glitches; that should be fixed in bzr for a while; i should really reupload it; maybe today :)! However, NEW queue seems to be rather long again, so I wouldnt hold my breath - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#448153: ITP: blueman -- GTK+ bluetooth management utility for GNOME
Whats the current status of this? If you have your current work uploaded somewhere? - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#528225: RFP: mozilla-devscripts
owner 528225 a...@debian.org retitle 528225 ITP: mozilla-devscripts thanks - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520661: O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner
retitle 520661 O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner thanks orphaning back in case fresh blood wants to work on this. On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:35:53AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:17:31AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: retitle 520661 ITA: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner owner 520661 a...@debian.org thanks On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal See the great thread about Sponsorship requirements and copyright files on debian-devel to understand why. I have not read through mail archive to understand why this triggered your move, but for now I take the ITA for this package ... could be that i jump off after reading that thread for sure :). Can you make your git tree public somewhere so that the transition will be technically more or less seemless? I'm not sure this is a good idea you jump in on xulrunner. Because that would mean more work for you, and I know you already have enough work, and that would also mean the mozilla team would basically not grow. Moreover, I'm not sure I will be able to keep my promise of actually stopping to maintain it... dude, if thats the case then don't orphan it :) ... or at least tell me offline that you want to use this O: to attract contributors rather than giving it away. In the end I still have the dream to eliminate one huge duplication of work - which xulrunner is imo. If we could share sources packages here and there it would be a huge win imo. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520661: O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:41:16AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 07:35:53AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:17:31AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: retitle 520661 ITA: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner owner 520661 a...@debian.org thanks On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal See the great thread about Sponsorship requirements and copyright files on debian-devel to understand why. I have not read through mail archive to understand why this triggered your move, but for now I take the ITA for this package ... could be that i jump off after reading that thread for sure :). I have read the thread now a bit and I agree that listing all copyright holders in debian/copyright is really a stupid; debian is not maintaining and distributing a perfect list of IP owners for source code; we distribute software. Period. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520661: O: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner
retitle 520661 ITA: xulrunner -- XUL + XPCOM application runner owner 520661 a...@debian.org thanks On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal See the great thread about Sponsorship requirements and copyright files on debian-devel to understand why. I have not read through mail archive to understand why this triggered your move, but for now I take the ITA for this package ... could be that i jump off after reading that thread for sure :). Can you make your git tree public somewhere so that the transition will be technically more or less seemless? Thanks! - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520324: ITP: chromium -- A web browser developed by Google based on the WebKit engine
Hi, we have a ready to use chromium package already and would like to take over this ITP together with you. would that be ok with you? Otherwise please join the https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-team where we do those packages. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#475022: any update?
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:23:31PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: Hi Alexander. Do you have any update on your ITP of connman? I want to use it for a project I'm working on, and the bits at git.moblin.org seem reasonable to package. If you're still interested, that's great, but if not please let me know and perhaps I'll take a stab at it. Yes, I uploaded the package to ubuntu already; will do the upload to debian asap. If you want to test you can build the ubuntu sources: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/connman https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/connman-gnome Thanks, - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#497701: ITP: libv8 -- Google V8 JavaScript Engine
Hi, Antonio, would you consider to team maintain this with Fabien? Fabien did quite a lot of work on the whole chromium stack, he just seemed to be not aware about how take an ITP. Also having the whole chromium stack maintained by a team seems to make a lot of sense to me. Thanks for considering this, - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#475022: status?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:22:32PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: what's the status of this ITP? Waiting for upstream to push something usable to their git. Last time I spoke with them they said, that we shouldnt bother to package that until they give me green light. (approx. Oct 08) - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#415381: reassigning ownership to Cesare (no reply)
owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks no reply on last mail. taking ownership. if I get no veto I will upload norsetto's package in a few days. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#475022: ITP: connman - Linux Connection Manager
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2008-04-08 Severity: wishlist Package name : connman Upstream Author : Intel Corporation License : GPL Homepage : http://www.moblin.org/projects/projects_connman.php Description : The Linux Connection Manager project provides a daemon for managing Internet connections within embedded devices running the Linux operating system. The Connection Manager is designed to be slim and to use as few resources as possible, so it can be easily integrated in other Moblin-based embedded systems. It is fully modular system that can be extended through plug-ins, to support all kinds of wired or wireless technologies. Also, configuration methods like DHCP and domain name resolving are implemented using plug-ins. The plug-in approach allows for easy adaption and modification for various use cases. The project currently contains the following components: * connman The core Connection Manager daemon (connmand) and plug-ins for Ethernet, WiFi, DHCP, and resolvconf. * connman-gnome The GTK+-based user interfaces for an applet and a properties dialog. Connection Manager uses modern infrastructure like D-Bus, HAL, and netlink to provide a native integration into the operating system. While HAL and netlink are used on the system level to communicate with networking devices, the whole separation between system daemon and user interface is done through D-Bus. At the moment the following extra components or applications are required: * wpa_supplicant (with D-Bus extensions) for WiFi access * dhclient for the DHCP plug-in * resolvconf for the domain name resolver plug-in * libgdbus for D-Bus and GLib integration (provided by the project itself) - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#475023: ITP: connman-gnome - GTK+ based user interface for the Linux Connection Manager
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2008-04-08 Severity: wishlist * Package Name : connman-gnome * Version : N/A * Upstream Author : Intel Corporation * Homepage : http://www.moblin.org/projects/projects_connman.php * Description : GTK+ based user interface for the Linux Connection Manager. The Linux Connection Manager project provides a daemon for managing Internet connections within embedded devices running the Linux operating system. The Connection Manager is designed to be slim and to use as few resources as possible, so it can be easily integrated in other Moblin-based embedded systems. For a more details on the Linux Connection Manager, please look at the connman package description. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#475023: ITP: connman-gnome - GTK+ based user interface for the Linux Connection Manager
The license is not yet clear because the git archive returns bogus data right now. But expect this to be GPL (or LGPL). - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#475025: ITP: libgdbus - D-Bus and GLib library used by the Linux Connection Manager
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2008-04-08 Severity: wishlist * Package name : libgdbus * Upstream Author : Intel Corporation * URL : http://www.moblin.org/projects/projects_connman.php * License : GPL/LGPL * Description : D-Bus and GLib library used by the Linux Connection Manager. The Linux Connection Manager project provides a daemon for managing Internet connections within embedded devices running the Linux operating system. The Connection Manager is designed to be slim and to use as few resources as possible, so it can be easily integrated in other Moblin-based embedded systems. It is fully modular system that can be extended through plug-ins, to support all kinds of wired or wireless technologies. For a more detailed description on the Linux Connection Manager consult the connman package/wnpp description. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#270533: ITPs pending: iceowl + iceowl-extension (aka sunbird+lightning)
tags 388218 + pending tags 270533 + pending thanks Ladies and Gentleman, I am finally happy to mark this pending ... upload should go to sid today. iceowl is the unbranded sunbird standalone application. lightning, the sunbird based thunderbird extension will be called iceowl-extension ... and will be usable in icedove + thunderbird. I will announce on debian planet once those are uploaded. Have fun, - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#282235: [Debian QA] please review your old bug reports against CUPS
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 02:28:45PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: reassign 282235 wnpp retitle 282235 RFP: Lexmark z42_cmyk CUPS back-end thanks On 7/15/07, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This bug most likely still persist. Last time I tried the lexmark just didn't work right out of the box ... and you had to spin your own driver. I'm afraid that most likely is not answering the question. I'm afraid that I don't have this printer anymore ... so ... - Alexander
Bug#409367: ITP: iceape-locales -- language packs for Iceape
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 02:09:54PM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote: Preliminary package (unfinished, not tested, lacks rebranding) can be found at http://pingu.ii.uj.edu.pl/~robert/iceape-locales/ Nice ... you think you can get the rebranding done soon, so we can push this? - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388218: mozilla-lightning
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 02:24:10PM +, John Talbut wrote: Sunbird is the standalone version, lightning is the extension for thunderbird (IceDove in debian) see http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/ . I see that iceape-calendar has gone into testing. Is this not based on Mozilla CalExt? If so, can it not be configured to work with IceApe or IceDove? And if iceape-calendar can go into testing, can lightning? iceape-calendar and lightning/sunbird are not exactly the same ... they share code, but thats all. I will upload lightning as soon as etch is out ... but not before. - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388218: Mozilla-lightning
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:55:55PM +0100, John Talbut wrote: Will this be packaged to be included in Etch when it becomes stable? Unlikely, though I will try. The problem is that calendar developers have not yet committed to release from the current stable branch. However, if etch is delayed there might be a chance that this will land in time. - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:43:23PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:47:01AM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please upload them somewhere for now? When do you leave on
vacation?
I'll upload to gluck in ${HOME}/public_html, which means it will be on
people.debian.org/~glandium/. Expect it to be done some time tonight
(local time: GMT+2)
I'm leaving on sunday, but will more than probably put me away from
saturday.
Did you have time to work on seamonkey during the past two weeks ?
Sorry, still working on the final security patches. Its because my
work-capacity has been significantly reduced during the last few weeks by
severe private-life hazards.
Please understand that I have to fix some real life issues first.
I regret all this, but I did not choose this doom either. I would
understand if you would not go ahead lifting this package as I have to
admit that I will not be able to put much time into this any-time soon
(at least not till nov).
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System
http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#266824: Bug#296743: Calendar for Firefox
merge 266824 388218 owner 388218 [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 388218 ITP: Lightning - calendar extension for thunderbird thanks Will take it as I already package sunbird. This extension will get built from sunbird sources ... or from its own sources ... but not before it is available from the same stable branches as thunderbird/firefox. On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:29:09AM +0100, John Talbut wrote: Mozilla appear to have discontinued work in the Calendar extension in favour of the Lightning extension for Thunderbird, see http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/ . I have submitted a RFP for Lightning, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388218 . - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:36:21PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 07:24:11AM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:46:36AM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:04:42PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: + maintenance place: + svn used by jaldhar? + complete checkin ... deflated As Jaldhar apparently has not much time, can we just highjack the svn archive for now? Or should we move to a new place? As you wish. I'm almost done with the patches triage, I'll soon be able to upload a set of patch for seamonkey. I have a set of patches for seamonkey, and a set of changes I want to do to the files that are currently in the collab-maint svn, according to the patches. I also have 4 or 5 patches that need porting to seamonkey, i.e. take the idea and do the same with the seamonkey specific build system/code. (For example, there is a patch to correctly install default.xpm which only applies to the xulrunner/ subdirectory of xulrunner, but for which the issue is also in all others mozilla products, but at a different place, with a possibly different fix) Please tell me where I should put all these before leaving, so that you can do your homework when I'm not here ;) Can you please upload them somewhere for now? When do you leave on vacation? - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:04:42PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: + maintenance place: + svn used by jaldhar? + complete checkin ... deflated As Jaldhar apparently has not much time, can we just highjack the svn archive for now? Or should we move to a new place? - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:41:31PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Hi everyone, (Sorry for the duplicates people may receive) I'd like to know what the status is for these ITP on seamonkey. Is actually someone working on it ? Are there any preliminary packages ? Being myself maintainer of xulrunner and co-maintainer of firefox, I can give a hand if necessary. I think Alexander Sack, who has worked on mozilla security updates wouldn't mind giving some advices too. If it appears that noone is working on that, I'll take over the ITPs and upload a seamonkey package by the end of september (I think), but I first need to know if someone is doing something or not, to avoid duplication of efforts. Thanks for your attention. I already offered to take over ITP ... but Jaldhar is working on this ... he uploaded a seamonkey package a few weeks ago, which was rejected because of too many lintian errors. Jaldhar, can you please repost the svn url? I have lost it and cannot look up. - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#360671: seamonkey for etch ?
Here the svn url I just looked up in my inbox ... svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-maint/deb-maint/seamonkey Jaldhar ... whats the current state ... we are starting to run out of time if we want to be safe to see this in etch? On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:41:31PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Hi everyone, (Sorry for the duplicates people may receive) I'd like to know what the status is for these ITP on seamonkey. Is actually someone working on it ? Are there any preliminary packages ? Being myself maintainer of xulrunner and co-maintainer of firefox, I can give a hand if necessary. I think Alexander Sack, who has worked on mozilla security updates wouldn't mind giving some advices too. If it appears that noone is working on that, I'll take over the ITPs and upload a seamonkey package by the end of september (I think), but I first need to know if someone is doing something or not, to avoid duplication of efforts. Thanks for your attention. Mike - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#350740: seamonkey for etch ?
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 03:00:22PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Well, in the current state, it still requires a lot of work to split the package in smaller parts like mozilla, and add transition packages. It would also be necessary to port most of the patches from xulrunner to make it work on all debian architectures. Hmm... so should we take this over to make things happen faster? What do you mean by port most of the patches from xulrunner ... won't they apply cleanly? So maybe we want to use seamonkey to see how good team maintainence for mozillas can work? Jaldhar would you agree to set [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the maintainer and list all that contribute explicitly as co-maintainer? Mike, what do you think about it? - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351430: seamonkey for etch ?
Dropping bugs from CC ... On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 08:49:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 07:04:00PM +0200, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So maybe we want to use seamonkey to see how good team maintainence for mozillas can work? Jaldhar would you agree to set [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the maintainer and list all that contribute explicitly as co-maintainer? Mike, what do you think about it? I think this is a great idea. It would be a preliminary step for me to turn the xulrunner maintainance into a team one, which i'd like to see happen, but not before I've clearly documented the whys and the hows of the xulrunner packaging, which a team maintainance of seamonkey will help me doing. I hope to be able to switch xulrunner to a team maintainance soon after the etch release, then we'll be able to experiment building the other mozilla applications on top of it, which, by then, should almost be officially supported upstream. OK, so lets discuss some basics like preferred package layout etc. Please comment and object: + package layout: upstream orig.tar.gz (no embedded tarball) ... but separate patches included (dpatch or something) + packages needed: + all current mozilla application equivalents + the -dev, but without libxxx packages. + a dbg package ... I want to see a dbg for all mozilla packages we have in etch. I will reupload a thunderbird build which I cancelled previously because I wanted security fixes to go into etch first. + maintenance place: + svn used by jaldhar? + complete checkin ... deflated + initial work-load: + mike reviews his patches clears up which ones are needed for archs, build system etc. + I move package to layout (orig.tar.gz + patches) as mentioned above (or whatever we decide to use) + anyone who has time does the work to tweak configure options and debhelper files to produce the packages mentioned above. We can either split this up in front or just first comes first serves? Anything important I missed? - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#350740: seamonkey packaging
Alex, if you still are willing to (co-)maintain it, I would offer to take over lead of team-maintainenance and prepare the intial package. As as soon as you got used to packaging debian stuff, you can of course take over the package completely ... if you want. Is this good with you? If you are interested, contact me through pm or jabber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374898: ITP: jxta-c -- a cross-network p2p library
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: jxta-c Version : 2.5 Upstream Author : The JXTA-C Project * URL : http://jxta-c.jxta.org * License : Jxta software license (based on apache license 1.1) Description : a cross-network p2p library JXTA is a set of open protocols that allow any connected device on the network ranging from cell phones and wireless PDAs to PCs and servers to communicate and collaborate in a P2P manner. JXTA peers create a virtual network where any peer can interact with other peers and resources directly even when some of the peers and resources are behind firewalls and NATs or are on different network transports. jxta-c is the complete reference C implementation of the JXTA specification. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#266824: mozilla-calendar vs mozilla-sunbird
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:34:27AM -0800, Matt Taggart wrote: Hi, I just reopened the WNPP FRP bugs 270533 and 266824. The mozilla/firefox/thunderbird calendar add-on, mozilla-calendar, is packaged and in the archive but the stand-alone version, mozilla-sunbird, is still not. More info at http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/ I uploaded sunbird to experimental. Thus, those bug were properly closed, right? - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#266824: mozilla-calendar vs mozilla-sunbird
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 12:39:24PM -0800, Matt Taggart wrote: If it's not likely to break systems, I'd say you should just go ahead and upload to unstable, closing these bugs with the upload. Hmm, I thought about that, but since this is just some random alpha release I rather stick to experimental. Once 0.3 final is out ... I will reconsider uploading to unstable. Anyway, sunbird is in queue-new, so good news :). - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#266824: Subbird 0.3alpha1
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:50:12PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: Hi Alexander, any chance you package this up anytime soon? Would be great to have this in the archive. Cheers, -- Guido Is there a first official alpha release available? Please understand, I don't like the idea to send some random cvs snapshot in the archive. - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#266824: Subbird 0.3alpha1
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 02:08:51PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:50:12PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: Hi Alexander, any chance you package this up anytime soon? Would be great to have this in the archive. Cheers, -- Guido Is there a first official alpha release available? Please understand, I don't like the idea to send some random cvs snapshot in the archive. Indeed, there is a release :) ... I will package it and see if their snapshot does not suck. Thanks for the ping. - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#266824: really experimental sunbird calendar package available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Just uploaded a sunbird package to my experimental p.d.o. archive. It is still not in a shape suitable for debian, but since upstream is quite a big step away from a releasable state too, I have no problems with releasing this snapshot today in such an experimental shape ... at least it works a bit :) The apt line you need: deb http://people.debian.org/~asac/experimental ./ The package you (maybe not) want: sunbird - (so no mozilla- prefix :) ) Please read my annoucement [1] for infos on how to get started and please remember to *not* use this for important things you really depend on. Oh, and there are some screenshots [2] too. BTW, I was not able to extract a good orig.tar.gz from upstreams archive. Hence, I did not upload the really bloated 60 MB full mozilla tree source tarball that I used to build this package from. Anyone interested in the diff, just drop a mail. [1] - http://www.asoftsite.org/sunbird.html [2] - http://www.asoftsite.org/sunbird_screens.html - -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCgK+zv8pLOKgkuT8RAlP3AJ0c6nRgaAWNa/SVPKNTF+1BU41nvQCbBcpg 15ulEfOxOBdxbq2vkIoenc0= =IwN2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#266824: progress?
Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Seems like mozilla was succefully updated a few days ago. Any progress on sunbird ? Thanks Mathieu Nope ... upstream did a mess with gtk2 support in the 0.2 release of the standalone app. The current HEAD is completely broken (they currently do a major rewrite of the backend). I must admit that for me it appears that it might be good to take a look at lightning - the thunderbird calendar extension. Maybe it is in a similar good state as mozilla calendar - actually usable. -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#266824: ITP of mozilla-sunbird
retitle 266824 ITP: mozilla-sunbird -- standalone calendar application based on Mozilla's XUL thanks Yes, I plan to produce the mozilla-sunbird binaries. Currently I am not sure wether I will produce another source package or will build this out of my mozilla-thunderbird sources. Will let you know within the next weeks
Bug#265329: progress?
Mohammed Adnène TROJETTE wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2004, Alexander Sack wrote: Any progress on this package? Otherwise I would take it! Yup, I have debs of 7-zip. But I am still looking for sponsors (even if I didn't ask on debian-mentors@, I asked on #debian-devel and #debian-devel-fr). If you find a sponsor for it, tell me. Downloadable? I would like to take a look at it! Are you in the NM queue? -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred. | : :' : The universal A. Sack - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.jwsdot.com/| `-http://www.debian.org/
Bug#138190: preview package available
Finally I got a preview package up ready. See: http://www.jwsdot.com/debian for infos on how to get this. After some additional testing I will finalize this package and make it ready for upload. -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack | : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.jwsdot.com/ | `-http://www.debian.org/
Bug#237039: ITP: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-nl -- Dutch Menu/Message resource and Region property package for Mozilla-Thunderbird
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-nl Version : 0.5 Upstream Author : thunderbirdnl.mozdev.org * URL : http://thunderbirdnl.mozdev.org * License : MPL-1.1 Description : Dutch Menu/Message resource and Region property package for Mozilla-Thunderbird http://thunderbirdnl.mozdev.org -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
