Bug#582286: Bug#582271: Looks as if the ITP for webm and libvpx are ITPs for the same software
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 04:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > for me it looks as if http://bugs.debian.org/582271 and > http://bugs.debian.org/582286 are more or less about packaging the > same software. (I'm though not sure so no merge by me, just a heads > up. :-) > > Regards, Axel They are, thanks for noticing :) libvpx is the library name for the encoder/decoder, webm is the marketing name of the file format. A package for libvpx is already waiting in NEW. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#582286: Bug#582271: Looks as if the ITP for webm and libvpx are ITPs for the same software
2010/5/20 Sebastian Dröge : > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 04:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: >> Hi, >> >> for me it looks as if http://bugs.debian.org/582271 and >> http://bugs.debian.org/582286 are more or less about packaging the >> same software. (I'm though not sure so no merge by me, just a heads >> up. :-) >> >> Regards, Axel > > They are, thanks for noticing :) > > libvpx is the library name for the encoder/decoder, webm is the > marketing name of the file format. > > A package for libvpx is already waiting in NEW. > You can have it then :) Cheers Arthur -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikxieue5oew6rhffvy2vvtpp6unp44inkbm1...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#582286: Bug#582271: Looks as if the ITP for webm and libvpx are ITPs for the same software
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:26 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:26:20AM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 04:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > for me it looks as if http://bugs.debian.org/582271 and > > > http://bugs.debian.org/582286 are more or less about packaging the > > > same software. (I'm though not sure so no merge by me, just a heads > > > up. :-) > > > > > > Regards, Axel > > > > They are, thanks for noticing :) > > > > libvpx is the library name for the encoder/decoder, webm is the > > marketing name of the file format. > > > > A package for libvpx is already waiting in NEW. > > Actually, libvpx only deals with the video codec part of webm. The > container part is handled by libnestegg (at least on mozilla end). > > Would some of you be interested in taking care of libnestegg ? I'm not interested in libnestegg, especially because I don't understand why they have to write yet another Matroska demuxer instead of using one of the existing ones... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#582286: Bug#582271: Looks as if the ITP for webm and libvpx are ITPs for the same software
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:33 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:26 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:26:20AM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 04:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > for me it looks as if http://bugs.debian.org/582271 and > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/582286 are more or less about packaging the > > > > same software. (I'm though not sure so no merge by me, just a heads > > > > up. :-) > > > > > > > > Regards, Axel > > > > > > They are, thanks for noticing :) > > > > > > libvpx is the library name for the encoder/decoder, webm is the > > > marketing name of the file format. > > > > > > A package for libvpx is already waiting in NEW. > > > > Actually, libvpx only deals with the video codec part of webm. The > > container part is handled by libnestegg (at least on mozilla end). > > > > Would some of you be interested in taking care of libnestegg ? > > I'm not interested in libnestegg, especially because I don't understand > why they have to write yet another Matroska demuxer instead of using one > of the existing ones... Oh and I should probably add that the gstreamer and ffmpeg matroska demuxer/muxers got support for webm already ;) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#582286: Bug#582271: Looks as if the ITP for webm and libvpx are ITPs for the same software
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:33:56PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:26 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:26:20AM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 04:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > for me it looks as if http://bugs.debian.org/582271 and
> > > > http://bugs.debian.org/582286 are more or less about packaging the
> > > > same software. (I'm though not sure so no merge by me, just a heads
> > > > up. :-)
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Axel
> > >
> > > They are, thanks for noticing :)
> > >
> > > libvpx is the library name for the encoder/decoder, webm is the
> > > marketing name of the file format.
> > >
> > > A package for libvpx is already waiting in NEW.
> >
> > Actually, libvpx only deals with the video codec part of webm. The
> > container part is handled by libnestegg (at least on mozilla end).
> >
> > Would some of you be interested in taking care of libnestegg ?
>
> I'm not interested in libnestegg, especially because I don't understand
> why they have to write yet another Matroska demuxer instead of using one
> of the existing ones...
Probably because webm is supposed to be a *strict* subset of matroska, not
matroska. I guess other stuff using matroska {de,}muxer won't care about
the strictness, which i actually think is not that good.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100520115636.ga13...@glandium.org
Bug#582286: Bug#582271: Looks as if the ITP for webm and libvpx are ITPs for the same software
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:26:20AM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 04:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > for me it looks as if http://bugs.debian.org/582271 and > > http://bugs.debian.org/582286 are more or less about packaging the > > same software. (I'm though not sure so no merge by me, just a heads > > up. :-) > > > > Regards, Axel > > They are, thanks for noticing :) > > libvpx is the library name for the encoder/decoder, webm is the > marketing name of the file format. > > A package for libvpx is already waiting in NEW. Actually, libvpx only deals with the video codec part of webm. The container part is handled by libnestegg (at least on mozilla end). Would some of you be interested in taking care of libnestegg ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100520112646.ga12...@glandium.org
