Re: [tbm@cyrius.com: Re: Speaker directory]

2004-01-09 Thread Matt Kraai 
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 01:02:48AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:54:03AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> [...]
> > Look at http://www.debian.org/events/speakers/
> > 
> > Ideally, it would say "topic" when there's 1 topic, and "topics" when
> > there are multiple.  However, I'm not sure if this is easily possible.
> 
> This is not trivial, a new  tag must be added to mp4h to
> handle plural forms.

Should I file a wishlist bug against mp4h?

-- 
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: probable error in a webpage

2004-01-09 Thread Matt Kraai 
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:34:58PM +0100, Luca Monducci wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> i'm a italian translator of Debian website. I'm working on
> ports/sparc/porting.wml and i find out this:
> 
> > If you want to be an official porter, you must be a registered Debian
> > developer.  That is, your private key must appear in the official
>
> > keyring.
> 
> Is that right?!

No, it should be your public key.  I've fixed it.  Thanks for
reporting.

-- 
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#226472: marked as done (www.debian.org: News-page not up to date)

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:50:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2004 23:13:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 06 17:13:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gondolin.schmehl.info [80.245.224.99] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AdpvO-0008Ga-00; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 06:03:06 -0600
Received: from pd9ea4758.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.234.71.88] 
helo=esgaroth.schmehl.info)
by gondolin.schmehl.info with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AdpvN-0001cA-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:03:05 +0100
Received: from alex by esgaroth.schmehl.info with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AdpvJ-0001Rl-00; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:03:01 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: News-page not up to date
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:03:01 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal


I got some news over the mailing list, but the last one on 
www.debian.org/News/ is from the 2nd of december.

And while testing some mirrors, I saw that  
http://www.br.debian.org/News/index.en.html is still stuck on the 10th 
of November.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux esgaroth 2.4.22-1-686 #6 Sat Oct 4 14:09:08 EST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
Received: (at 226472-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 23:36:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 09 17:36:57 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aev9o-0005Fy-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:50:28 -0600
Received: from pd9530854.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.8.84] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Aev9m-pw-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:50:27 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Aev9a-lH-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:50:14 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:50:12 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not a bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

On www.debian.org/News/ are typically only news posted that were sent to
debian-announce, too. I can't see any mails from debian-announce missing
on the web pages.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: [tbm@cyrius.com: Re: Speaker directory]

2004-01-09 Thread Denis Barbier 
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:54:03AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
[...]
> Look at http://www.debian.org/events/speakers/
> 
> Ideally, it would say "topic" when there's 1 topic, and "topics" when
> there are multiple.  However, I'm not sure if this is easily possible.

This is not trivial, a new  tag must be added to mp4h to
handle plural forms.

Denis

Bug#222537: marked as done (www.debian.org: fallback link missing for News/2003/20031121)

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:45:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2003 17:21:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 30 11:20:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from uucp.gnuu.de [151.189.0.84] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AQVFJ-0004AX-00; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 11:20:33 -0600
Received: from lambda.foxxnet.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by uucp.gnuu.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with bsmtp id hAUHKWHA009939
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:20:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hardy by lambda.foxxnet.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AQVEY-0003YN-00; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:19:46 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Johann Hartwig Hauschild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: IE-Users get 406 - Not Acceptable
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:19:46 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important

Moin.

We just noticed, that http://www.debian.org/News/2003/20031121 Can not
be viewed using IE if one has not enabled english[en] as Language -
Apparently there is no fallback if the Content-Negotiation fails.

mfg,
Hardy

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lambda 2.6.0-test11 #3 Thu Nov 27 17:30:33 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE



---
Received: (at 222537-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 14:22:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 09 08:22:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aev5R-0004NG-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:45:57 -0600
Received: from pd9530854.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.8.84] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Aev5P-oM-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:45:56 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Aev5A-ku-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:45:40 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:45:39 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

now sending it to -done to really close the bug...

This issue should be fixed for a few weeks now.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#225390: marked as done (www.debian.org: cvs.d.o viewcvs not accepting dak repository)

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:47:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2003 14:59:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 29 08:59:28 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from salzburg.nitnet.com.br (nat.cesarb.net) [200.157.92.10] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AayEM-qQ-00; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:18:50 -0600
Received: from cesarb by flower.home.cesarb.net with local (Exim 4.22)
id 1AayEH-0005Mz-Qq; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:18:45 -0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: cvs.d.o viewcvs not accepting dak repository
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:18:45 -0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Following a link from http://www.debian.org/devel/testing to
http://cvs.debian.org/testing/?cvsroot=dak the error message appears:

Repository cvsroot dak not configured in viewcvs.conf

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux flower 2.6.0-reiserfsaclea-flower #1 Fri Dec 19 15:27:20 BRST 
2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8


---
Received: (at 225390-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 16:34:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 09 10:34:01 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aev6f-0004dL-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:47:13 -0600
Received: from pd9530854.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.8.84] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Aev6e-oh-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:47:13 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Aev6V-l4-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:47:03 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:47:03 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

This should work now again.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: Packages

2004-01-09 Thread debian_lists 
Alfie,


A better question would be, what exactly happened to "packages," and what
might we do to help. Is the problem just that the system is possibly
"tainted" due to the intrusion and needs close inspection, or has
something been physically/irreparably deleted? Perhaps the system is being
both debugged, untainted, and upgraded?

I certainly wouldn't mind putting some time into taint-searching or even
recoding sections of the package-search system if I knew how to make such
help available

First step of course, subscribing to debian-www (which, oddly, hasn't
given me a confirmation so I'm not even sure this is going to be received
properly) is done.



-

In-Reply-To:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2004/debian-www-200401/msg5.html

* Pim Scheffers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-02 09:32]:
> I'm wondering when http://packages.debian.org is gonna come up again.

 Like everything in a Free Software project: When it's ready. All I can
tell you that it is worked on.  To make you a little bit happy: The
version that will become online now will support non-i386 packages and
package translations too (at least from what I understand) and close
quite some bugreports

 So long,
Alfie
-- 
"Die Angabe des vollständigen Realnamens erleichtert die Kommunikation
im Usenet ungemein, man kann sich dann nämlich auf die Inhalte der
Postings konzentrieren und muß nicht über Sinn/Unsinn von Pseudonymen
o.ä. diskutieren." (Ingo Ließegang, de.newusers.questions, 6.10.1999)

Bug#224377: marked as done (mailing list subscription form broken)

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:32:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2003 14:44:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 18 08:44:24 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-217-155-238-158.zen.co.uk (maxwell.triv.org.uk) 
[217.155.238.158] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AWxay-0004Nz-00; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 06:49:36 -0600
Received: from simon by maxwell.triv.org.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AWxax-0006IY-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:49:35 +
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:49:35 +
From: Simon Heywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mailing list subscription form broken
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org

I recently tried adding myself to a couple of extra Debian mailing lists
using the web form at .
The usual page came up, along the lines of "mail sent subscribing you to
debian-devel" but several minutes later I'd received no confirmation
request. I later mailed debian-devel-request directly and got an instant
response, so this made me suspect that there's something up with the web
form. Of course, it could just be a normal delay, but this has happened
twice now. Perhaps someone could investigate

Regards,
Simon

---
Received: (at 224377-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 16:35:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 09 10:35:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aexgi-0006Yk-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 08:32:36 -0600
Received: from pd9530854.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.8.84] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Aexgh-0001cP-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:32:35 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Aexga-0001I5-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:32:28 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:32:27 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

I can't reproduce this anymore. Seems that it has been fixed.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: Assessing the outdatedness of our web site translations

2004-01-09 Thread Frank Lichtenheld 
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:18:12PM -0500, Alexander Winston wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 16:05, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> 
> I agree that keeping these pages online will harm more than help.
> Careful attention must be paid whenever pages are removed, temporarily
> or permanently. I suggest replacing the pages with a notice that they
> will be back in the future (no nasty 404).


This should be no problem as it is about translations only and who
links to the Debian website with explicit language extension should
be doomed anyway ;)

If we just delete them im CVS so that they aren't build anymore it 
should suffice.

Great idea anyway. Asking you about the status of it was somewhere on 
my todo list ;)

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#223713: marked as done (Outdated "latest" release.)

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:58:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2003 19:52:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 11 13:52:38 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AUVBN-0001wD-00; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:05:01 -0600
Received: from satyr (c-24-5-198-226.client.comcast.net[24.5.198.226])
  by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP
  id <2003121118045901300ktolge>
  (Authid: gazbo_satyr);
  Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:04:59 +
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:03:22 -0800
From: Alexander Blazej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Outdated "latest" release.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; Format=Flowed; DelSp=Yes; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Balsa 2.0.15
Content-Length: 331
Lines: 14
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_11 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_11
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 2003.12.11

The page:

http://www.debian.org/

contains out of date information "3.0r1" and "December 16th, 2002" in  
the sentence:

The latest stable release of Debian is 3.0r1. The last update  
to this release was made on December 16th, 2002. Read more about  
available versions of Debian.


---
Received: (at 58-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 15:46:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 09 09:46:49 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AevHv-0006fw-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:58:51 -0600
Received: from pd9530854.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.8.84] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AevHt-sp-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:58:50 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AevHc-lw-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:58:32 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:58:30 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Oh, I forgot to close these bug reports. All references to 3.0r1
should have been updated.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

[lazarini@nics.unicamp.br: Problem with a link in the translated version]

2004-01-09 Thread Richard Atterer 
- Forwarded message from Marcos Vinicius Lazarini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:39:24 -0200
From: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-cd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Problem with a link in the translated version

Hi,

I was trying to download the r2 updated version but the portuguese site 
has a problem, in the following page:
http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/index.pt.html

here, the link to the .jigdo files
"Arquivos jigdo oficiais para a distribuição "stable" em CD: espelho em 
EUA , espelho na 
Europa "
points to r1, not r2.
http://us.cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/3.0_r1/jigdo/
not
http://us.cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/3.0_r2/jigdo/

I noticed that spanish and french have also the same problem.

Maybe its better to point the link to a parent directory to make this 
link imune to that sort of problem... and to make life simpler to the 
webpage matainer... :-)


Thanks for the wonderful work,

Marcos Lazarini


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- End forwarded message -

  Richard

-- 
  __   _
  |_) /|  Richard Atterer |  GnuPG key:
  | \/¯|  http://atterer.net  |  0x888354F7
  ¯ '` ¯

Bug#222519: marked as done (www.debian.org: Getting Started on the Homepage still says: "The latest stable release of Debian is 3.0r1")

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:58:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2003 13:19:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 30 07:18:59 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp-62-245-162-62.mnet-online.de 
(base.int.michael.schwarzbach.name) [62.245.162.62] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AQRTW-VU-00; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 07:18:59 -0600
Received: from localhost (base.int.michael.schwarzbach.name [127.0.0.1])
by base.int.michael.schwarzbach.name (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 58A65101DB; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:48:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from base.int.michael.schwarzbach.name ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (base [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 03122-02; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:48:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by base.int.michael.schwarzbach.name (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AA00C101D9; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:47:58 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Michael R. Schwarzbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Getting Started on the Homepage still says: "The latest
 stable release of Debian is 3.0r1"
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:47:58 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at 
int.michael.schwarzbach.name
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal


Hi,

on the Homepage the Getting Started section still says:
"The latest stable release of Debian is 3.0r1"
although just underneah the News sections says in the latest news:
"Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 updated (r2)"

Cheers,
Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux base 2.4.22_pre2-gss #1 SMP Wed Sep 24 19:51:11 CEST 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 58-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 15:46:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 09 09:46:49 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AevHv-0006fw-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:58:51 -0600
Received: from pd9530854.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.8.84] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AevHt-sp-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:58:50 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AevHc-lw-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:58:32 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:58:30 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Oh, I forgot to close these bug reports. All references to 3.0r1
should have been updated.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#223471: marked as done (www.debian.org: References to 3.0r1 need to be updated)

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:58:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2003 17:20:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 09 11:20:52 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from urchin.earth.li [193.201.200.73] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ATkrr-0004Hz-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:37:47 -0600
Received: from gw-bgdn.cipe ([10.1.1.1] helo=gw)
by urchin.earth.li with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1ATkrq-0004ZM-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:37:46 +
Received: from callisto.house
([10.1.1.12] helo=callisto ident=mail)
by gw with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1ATkrq-0005Nq-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:37:46 +
Received: from dom by callisto with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1ATkrp-0006Ak-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:37:45 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: References to 3.0r1 need to be updated
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:37:45 +
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME 
autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20031209
Severity: normal

Several places on the web site incorrectly reference 3.0r1 as being the
current release, eg:

http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/#which
http://www.debian.org/

the former could be fixed by changing the links
/jigdo-area/3.0_r1/jigdo/ to //jigdo-area/3.0_r2/jigdo, or wait for
the bug #223437 to be fixed and use the "current" link instead.

---
Received: (at 223471-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 15:46:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 09 09:46:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AevHv-0006fw-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:58:51 -0600
Received: from pd9530854.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.8.84] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AevHt-sp-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:58:50 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AevHc-lw-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:58:32 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:58:30 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Oh, I forgot to close these bug reports. All references to 3.0r1
should have been updated.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: Assessing the outdatedness of our web site translations

2004-01-09 Thread Alexander Winston 
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 16:05, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Half a year ago I said that I was working on weeding out outdated
> translations from the web site. Outdated, in this context, means
> translations that has not been updated along with their original
> documents for several months.
> 
> Finally I have got around to follow up on it. I have prepared a report
> at http://people.debian.org/~peterk/outdated/> which lists, for
> each language, all documents not updated for two weeks.
> 
> My intention is to, at some point, start removing from the archive all
> pages that have not been updated for six months after the document its
> translates has changed, on the basis that keeping these ancient
> translations on-line will just confuse the readers more than they will
> help.
> 
> I will not do this until normal cvs operations have been restored,
> however. I know that some translation teams are struggling at the
> moment due to lack of proper cvs access.

I agree that keeping these pages online will harm more than help.
Careful attention must be paid whenever pages are removed, temporarily
or permanently. I suggest replacing the pages with a notice that they
will be back in the future (no nasty 404).


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: probable error in a webpage

2004-01-09 Thread Alexander Winston 
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 09:34, Luca Monducci wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> i'm a italian translator of Debian website. I'm working on
> ports/sparc/porting.wml and i find out this:
> 
> > If you want to be an official porter, you must be a registered Debian
> > developer.  That is, your private key must appear in the official
>
> > keyring.
> 
> Is that right?!
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Luca

Nah, I am almost definitely sure that that is incorrect. However, my
knowledge of GPG and porting is not very extensive.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#222258: marked as done (www.debian.org: getting started outdated)

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:58:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2003 22:09:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 26 16:09:07 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from brain.e27.com (mail.e27.com) [212.5.7.194] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AP7qN-0007nJ-00; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:09:07 -0600
Received: from grohl.achos.com (unknown [82.139.201.73])
by mail.e27.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8F2C2FC0B; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:09:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: by grohl.achos.com (Postfix, from userid )
id 1446393C07; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:08:56 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tobias Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: getting started outdated
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:08:56 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal


'Getting Started' on the main page still lists woody 3.0r1
as latest stable release, whilst News has r2 in already.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux grohl 2.4.22-ac4 #2 Wed Nov 12 17:22:00 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-1


---
Received: (at 58-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 15:46:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 09 09:46:49 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AevHv-0006fw-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:58:51 -0600
Received: from pd9530854.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.8.84] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AevHt-sp-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:58:50 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AevHc-lw-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:58:32 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:58:30 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Oh, I forgot to close these bug reports. All references to 3.0r1
should have been updated.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Processed: retitle 223449 to Please provide a link to the RC buglist from Bugs/

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 223449 Please provide a link to the RC buglist from Bugs/
Bug#223449: Please provide a link to the RC buglist from the main page.
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#222537: This should be fixed now

2004-01-09 Thread Frank Lichtenheld 
Since the websites are generated normally for some weeks now, this
issue is fixed.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

probable error in a webpage

2004-01-09 Thread Luca Monducci 
Hi,

i'm a italian translator of Debian website. I'm working on
ports/sparc/porting.wml and i find out this:

> If you want to be an official porter, you must be a registered Debian
> developer.  That is, your private key must appear in the official
   
> keyring.

Is that right?!


Cheers,
Luca

Processed: retitle 224874 to cvs.debian.org: still no pserver access

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 224874 cvs.debian.org: still no pserver access
Bug#224874: www.debian.org/weekly/ is not translated to polish language
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

THE-HANOREABLE-----UNICEF-----2000+1000+...

2004-01-09 Thread victoria laademan 
TO-THE-HANOREABLE-VICTORIALAADEMAN--database-officer---MIRROR
+.www.mirror.ac.uk/
 
ITERNET.NO.1.WEB.www.sun.comNO.2.WEB.www.unicefusa.orgNO.3.WEB.www.mirror.ac.uk/NO.4.WEB.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/icpages.htmNO.5.WEB.www.unsystem.orgNO.6.WEB.www.nato.intNO.7.WEB.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.htmlNO.8.WEB.www.inqueweb.com.auNO.9.WEB.www.ctbto.orgNO.10.WEB.www.bbc.co.uk/NO.11.WEB.www.usp.br.NO.12.WEB.www.w3.org/PICS/PICS-FAQ-980126.htmlTHE-HANOREABLE-UNICEF-KEAP/THE-HANOREABLE-MR.SUDHIRNAYAK---CYACLEUNICEF---USA...DATE.1.01.2004+...TIME.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org YOUR`S-THE-HANOREABLE-MR.SUDHIRNAYAK/SERAGADABLOCKCOLONI/GANJAM/ORISSA/INDIA1.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.ctbto.orgOR2.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.orgOR3.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/OR4.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.nato.intOR5.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.ctbto.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/[EMAIL PROTECTED]passwod.INTERNET.www.nato.int[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html
Yahoo! India Mobile: Ringtones, Wallpapers, Picture Messages and more.
Download now.

[tbm@cyrius.com: Re: Speaker directory]

2004-01-09 Thread Matt Kraai 
Howdy,

Would one of the WML experts please help me with this?

- Forwarded message from Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Speaker directory
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 19:49:59 +
To: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Look at http://www.debian.org/events/speakers/

Ideally, it would say "topic" when there's 1 topic, and "topics" when
there are multiple.  However, I'm not sure if this is easily possible.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- End forwarded message -

-- 
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]