Bug#977733: marked as done (www.debian.org: inconsistent info in repo regarding file english/News/2019/20190216.wml)
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2024 18:19:08 +0100 with message-id <5a604f25df8d5b2a2624bf3265976b46f218f1e4.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#977733: www.debian.org: inconsistent info in repo regarding file english/News/2019/20190216.wml has caused the Debian Bug report #977733, regarding www.debian.org: inconsistent info in repo regarding file english/News/2019/20190216.wml to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 977733: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977733 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainers, It seems that there is something odd in the webmaster-team/webwml.git repository at salsa regarding file english/News/2019/20190216.wml. We get inconsistent results when we issue the git log command using different arguments. Commit with hash 9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4 was made in December 2019, and it corresponds to a modification of file english/News/2019/20190216.wml according to the output of the "git log ... commit-hash" command: $ git log -n1 --format=fuller --name-only 9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4 commit 9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4 Author: Laura Arjona Reina AuthorDate: Fri Dec 13 20:13:29 2019 +0100 Commit: Laura Arjona Reina CommitDate: Fri Dec 13 20:13:29 2019 +0100 remove the tag for frontpage english/News/2019/20190216.wml On the other hand, if we ask for the commits that represent modifications of the very same file via the "git log -- path/filename" command, we get the following: $ git log --format=fuller --name-only -- english/News/2019/20190216.wml commit ea6a13e28f99e15f67ccfd6b74b4cc4bb185fdbd Author: Laura Arjona Reina AuthorDate: Tue Apr 2 08:28:56 2019 +0200 Commit: Laura Arjona Reina CommitDate: Tue Apr 2 08:35:59 2019 +0200 https://security.debian.org -> https://www.debian.org/security english/News/2019/20190216.wml commit fdc485a3cb59ae0b5ef29c7ff90f411b2444ed09 Author: Donald Norwood AuthorDate: Sat Feb 16 10:38:53 2019 -0500 Commit: Donald Norwood CommitDate: Sat Feb 16 10:38:53 2019 -0500 Debian 9.8 release announcement english/News/2019/20190216.wml As you can see, the output of the second command does not include the commit with hash 9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4, Dec. 2019. The first (most recent) commit shown was made in April 2019. Note: we have found a similar behaviour regarding file english/CD/faq/index.wml. If you think that it is better to submit a separate bug report for it, please, let me know. Regards, Rafa. signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, 2022-01-23 at 10:09 +, Rafa wrote: > When we add the option --full-history to our "git log -- > path/filename" > command we do get the commit we expected (the one with hash > 9bd5a55d72acee622d9e25eecb70e1beb93d0ea4): [...] > So, the reported behaviour seems to be just a consequence of git log > command's default history simplification. > > I think that this bug report can be closed now. Doing so now. Regards, Adam--- End Message ---
Processed: reassign 1073286 to wiki.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1073286 wiki.debian.org Bug #1073286 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Broken link in https://wiki.debian.org/Fonts#Commonly_Used_Fonts Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'wiki.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1073286 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1073286 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1073286: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073286 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: reassign 1076697 to www.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1076697 www.debian.org Bug #1076697 [debian-www] Translation of "Galician" is missing from trixie release notes table Warning: Unknown package 'debian-www' Bug reassigned from package 'debian-www' to 'www.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1076697 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1076697 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1076697: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076697 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1074497: marked as done (wiki.debian.org: NVIDIA Optimus: Still necessary to avoid the intel Xorg driver?)
Your message dated Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:17:50 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <3fcdfc14-1269-e5fd-2d4c-270212acc...@sourcepole.ch> and subject line a ticket is not the place to discuss wiki articles has caused the Debian Bug report #1074497, regarding wiki.debian.org: NVIDIA Optimus: Still necessary to avoid the intel Xorg driver? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1074497: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074497 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: larri...@inbox.lv Dear Maintainer, '.. Also make sure that the outdated xserver-xorg-video-intel package is not installed. The "modesetting" xorg driver has superseded it and will be used in this configuration.' I have Debian 12.5 (i.e. current as of June 2024) but I have the intel driver installed. When I try to use apt to install the modesetting driver, I get a redirect to xserver-xorg-core and the result that everything is already up-to-date. Has the modesetting driver been withdrawn and superseded by the original drivers? Does the wiki need an update? Regards, Scott. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello Scott, Scott MacKenzie wrote on 2024-06-29: Dear Maintainer, '.. Also make sure that the outdated xserver-xorg-video-intel package is not installed. The "modesetting" xorg driver has superseded it and will be used in this configuration.' I have Debian 12.5 (i.e. current as of June 2024) but I have the intel driver installed. When I try to use apt to install the modesetting driver, I get a redirect to xserver-xorg-core and the result that everything is already up-to-date. Has the modesetting driver been withdrawn and superseded by the original drivers? Does the wiki need an update? Debian tickets are not the right means to discuss wiki articles. Therefore I am closing this ticket. Instead you can use f.ex. Debian's IRC [1] channel to do that or you can use one of the Debian Users mailing lists [2]. If you want to fix an article or discuss variants of ways of how to do things, then you can make yourself a wiki account and discuss the issue directly in the article. Even better, you can check the history of the article and you can try to ask the people that wrote the passages that you want to discuss directly. Also note that people can watch articles and if they do then they will get notified of your edits and if the watchers think there's a problem with the edits they still can correct them. Greetings and thanks for contributing! *t [1] https://wiki.debian.org/IRC [2] https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/--- End Message ---
Processed: reassign 1074176 to www.debian.org, user www.debian....@release.debian.org, usertagging 1074176
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # How is this a "general" bug? > reassign 1074176 www.debian.org Bug #1074176 [general] packages.debian.org: allow seeing files Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'www.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1074176 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1074176 to the same values previously set > user www.debian@release.debian.org Setting user to www.debian@release.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). > usertags 1074176 + packages There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: packages. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1074176: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074176 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1073204: marked as done (www.debian.org: untranslated string in translations of https://www.debian.org/intro/organization.html)
Your message dated Sat, 15 Jun 2024 19:04:37 + with message-id <666de5c52b4fc_32c48596058...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1073204 fixed in www.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1073204, regarding www.debian.org: untranslated string in translations of https://www.debian.org/intro/organization.html to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1073204: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073204 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: l10n Dear Maintainer, The translations of https://www.debian.org/intro/organization.html have the following untranslated sentence: "Debian is a member of the following organizations, either directly or through SPI." This is due to the fact that that sentence is part of the file english/intro/organization.data instead of english/intro/organization.wml. This problem could be solved by moving that specific sentence to english/intro/organization.wml and by splitting up english/intro/organization.data in two parts. A part 1 that gets included by a line #include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/intro/organization-part1.data" that comes in english/intro/organization.wmljust before the line "Debian is a member of the following organizations, either directly or through SPI." and a part 2 that gets included by a line #include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/intro/organization-part2.data" that has to be placed just after the forementioned line. Kindly, Frans Spiesschaert -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.13 APT prefers oldoldstable-updates APT policy: (500, 'oldoldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-26-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=nl_BE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, Bug #1073204 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/6cadb1162628a7fdf8b8fe5124c707136d7ae90a Reorder organization.data and move one paragraph from organization.data to organization.wml. (Closes: #1073204) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1073204--- End Message ---
Bug#1016694: marked as done (packages.debian.org uses favicon with white shadow)
Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2024 16:48:35 + with message-id <66521663982fc_28480f94c55...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1016694 fixed in www.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1016694, regarding packages.debian.org uses favicon with white shadow to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1016694: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016694 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I switched my browser to use dark theme and access packages.debian.org with it. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I switched my browser to use dark theme and access packages.debian.org with it. * What was the outcome of this action? I saw that it uses a favicon with a white grop shadown looking really ugly. * What outcome did you expect instead? To see a just red favicon just like the one of www.debian.org or wiki.debian.org See the attached screenshot of my open tabs showing from left to right packages.debian.org (with an ugly favicon), www.debian.org and wiki.debian.org. Best regards, Alexander -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.12 APT prefers oldstable-updates APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-18-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, Bug #1016694 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/commit/9168b2d3acf138dd19779c544164eac1091ea7b3 Use favicon from debian.org, as also changed in master branch. Closes: #1016694 (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1016694--- End Message ---
Bug#915972: marked as done (Broken policy documentation links in p.d.o)
Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2024 10:55:39 +0200
with message-id <0adf89c5-4e50-4874-bd18-c74e36bc6...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: #915972Broken policy documentation links in p.d.o
has caused the Debian Bug report #915972,
regarding Broken policy documentation links in p.d.o
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
915972: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915972
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: newcomer
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: packages
X-Debbugs-CC: alf...@agrell.info
Hello all
As reported in the mail message below (thanks Alfred!, you may want to
subscribe to the bug number or even submit a patch), some links in
packages.debian.org need to be updated to point to the current Debian
Policy URLs.
I have searched for debian-policy links in the packages repo
(https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages) and tried the URLs
found. These ones need to be updated:
lib/Parse/DebianChangelog.pm:1258:L<https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#debian-changelog-debian-changelog>.
templates/config/archive_layout.tmpl:22:main =>
'https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#the-main-archive-area',
templates/config/archive_layout.tmpl:23:contrib =>
'https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#the-contrib-archive-area',
templates/config/archive_layout.tmpl:24:'non-free' =>
'https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#the-non-free-archive-area',
templates/html/show.tmpl:61:[%- PROCESS marker text=g('essential')
title=g('package manager will refuse to remove this package by default')
url='https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#essential-packages' IF
page.get_newest('essential') == 'yes' %]
Kind regards,
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
El 13/11/18 a las 23:48, Alfred Agrell escribió:
> Hello,
>
> bug report: the [contrib] links on packages.debian.org currently lead to
> <https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#the-contrib-archive-area>,
> which is just an index page. The intended target has an extra
> ch-archive.html,
> <https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#the-contrib-archive-area>.
>
>
> This shows up on, for example,
> <https://packages.debian.org/stretch-backports/virtualbox> and
> <https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=virtualbox>. The same issue
> exists on [non-free] packages too.
>
> - Alfred Agrell
>
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This has been dealed with in the meantime; closing this bug.
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3--- End Message ---
Bug#900990: marked as done ([www.debian.org] update broken links to alioth.debian.org (and aliases))
Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2024 00:41:32 +0200 with message-id <26193.6044.973160.915...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #900990, regarding [www.debian.org] update broken links to alioth.debian.org (and aliases) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 900990: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900990 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal User: debian-www@lists.debian.org Usertags: content Tags: newcomer Hello all A lot of links have been updated already (thanks!) but we still have in the website links pointing to alioth.debian.org or its aliases. I'm attaching several lists of links that we should update at some time. Notes: * Most of them are in news items from the past. * For source code repositories, some of them are migrated to salsa but the format of the URLs is different (so you need to find in salsa the item we're linking to, and then update the whole URL with the URL of the new link). * The repos that were not migrated to salsa are now in https://alioth-archive.debian.org/ but in .tar.xz format, so similar situation. * Some web pages that were in the sites with URL type http[s]://some-project.alioth.debian.org/ are now in Salsa pages (under pages.debian.net) but we cannot tell exactly where. Hints: look at the source code repo of the corresponding team, or ask the corresponding team * For very old stuff that was not migrated and is definitely gone (because in alioth-archive there are only repositories), we can choose between linking to archive.org (if exists archive of those pages) or delete the link (and maybe add a note about dead link? a note will need translations, though). * The attached lists are from the /english folder. If something is changed there, translations should be updated as well. The script smartchange.pl may help on that, but note that its behavior is now different than what we had with CVS (call it with -h to see the help message). * I suggest to start with the obvious updates, and leave the ones that is not clear how to update them to the end, posting here in this bug report the suggestions. Interested people willing to help even more with broken links can also have a look at: https://www-master.debian.org/build-logs/urlcheck/ Cheers -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona News/2000/20001115.wml:10:<http://cvs.debian.org/";>cvs.debian.org>, and is News/2000/20001115.wml:20:BrainFood for hosting www.debian.org and cvs.debian.org respectively News/weekly/2003/49/index.wml:124:that the CVS repository on cvs.debian.org is back, but all pserver accounts News/weekly/2003/08/index.wml:28:href="http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/english/users/index.wml?cvsroot=webwml";>\ News/weekly/2003/45/index.wml:109:href="http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/TODO?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup";>\ News/weekly/2003/03/index.wml:39:href="http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/?cvsroot=debian-doc";>Debian Documentation News/weekly/2003/21/index.wml:192:href="https://cvs.debian.org/?cvsroot=debbugs";>CVS repository. News/weekly/2003/06/index.wml:146:href="http://cvs.debian.org/apt/po/?cvsroot=APT+%28%2Fcvs%2Fdeity%29";>CVS, News/weekly/2003/37/index.wml:132:href="http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/INSTALLATION-HOWTO?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup";>\ News/weekly/2003/23/index.wml:38:href="http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/TODO?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup";>\ News/weekly/2004/37/index.wml:103:href="http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/?cvsroot=debian-doc";>\ News/weekly/2004/51/index.wml:83:href="http://cvs.debian.org/mia/?cvsroot=qa";>MIA database management in News/weekly/2004/51/index.wml:98:href="http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/?cvsroot=debian-doc";>\ News/weekly/2001/27/index.wml:22:href="http://cvs.debian.org/boot-floppies/documentation/";>current version News/weekly/2005/21/index.wml:71:in the archive http://cvs.debian.org/dak/?cvsroot=dak";>suite. News/weekly/2005/26/index.wml:58:href="http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?rev=HEAD&cvsroot=dak&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup";>\ News/weekly/2002/28/index.wml:97:href="http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/ui.txt";>design. Work an
Bug#1071739: marked as done (packages.debian.org: Removal of spam domain from download mirror page)
Your message dated Fri, 24 May 2024 17:31:01 + with message-id <6650ced53bb43_28480f94c54...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1071739 fixed in www.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1071739, regarding packages.debian.org: Removal of spam domain from download mirror page to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1071739: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071739 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal User: www.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: packages X-Debbugs-Cc: sa...@debian.org Below content is verbatim from <https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2024/05/msg00039.html> Hello, While downloading binary file for a package, on download page [1], under South America mirror, there exists http[:]//debian.torredehanoi.org domain. Said domain redirected to https[:]//iyfbodn.com which is getting blocked in uBlock Origin (due to inclusion in Easylist and Peter Lowe;s Ad and tracking server list). URL seems like spam and would request it's removal. [1]: https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/asn/download--- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, Bug #1071739 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/commit/68dd648d0b460c33c396e743732268c0bcd10f8a remove spam domain, Closes: #1071739 (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1071739--- End Message ---
Bug#861781: marked as done (www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information)
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 23:19:46 +0200 with message-id <26187.48754.244035.733...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #861781, regarding www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 861781: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861781 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist The list of Debian memberships on our website is outdated. https://www.debian.org/misc/memberships We might want to: Replace the representatives that are retired* from Debian: GNOME Foundation (representative: Matthew Garrett*) Linux Standards Base (representative: Wichert Akkerman*) SchoolForge (representatives: Ben Armstrong*, Raphaël Hertzog) OASIS: Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (representative: Mark Johnson*) Reconfirm the involvement of these representatives: Linux International (representative: Ean R. Schuessler) Linux Professional Institute (representative: Christoph Lameter) SchoolForge (representatives: Ben Armstrong*, Raphaël Hertzog) OVAL: Open Vulnerability Assessment Language (representative: Javier Fernández-Sanguino) Find out who our representatives are for these organisations: Linux Magazine advisory council Discuss membership possibilities with: Linux Foundation (the Free Standards Group got merged into LF) Add other organisations that Debian has representatives in. Look at which other organisations Debian may want membership in. Remove these organisations that no longer exist: Desktop Linux Consortium (representative: Colin Walters*) -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- We included the changes o nthe web page. For further changes please open a new bug report. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#754601: marked as done ([www] tidy reports errors on release pages)
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 23:13:42 +0200 with message-id <26187.48390.554539.576...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #754601, regarding [www] tidy reports errors on release pages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 754601: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754601 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Tags: patch what it reports are nested strong elements and undefined small-non-free-cd-images element. on the squeeze page, entire block is useless -- victory Index: squeeze/debian-installer/index.wml === --- squeeze/debian-installer/index.wml (revision 103) +++ squeeze/debian-installer/index.wml (working copy) @@ -78,14 +78,7 @@ and general information about loading firmware during an installation can be found in the Installation Guide (see Documentation below). - - -netinst (generally 175-240 MB) non-free -CD images with firmware - - - Index: wheezy/debian-installer/index.wml === --- wheezy/debian-installer/index.wml (revision 103) +++ wheezy/debian-installer/index.wml (working copy) @@ -89,8 +89,8 @@ -netinst (generally 240-290 MB) non-free -CD images with firmware +netinst (generally 240-290 MB) non-free +CD images with firmware> --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This does not seem to be a problem any more. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#805451: marked as done (Bugs/Reporting: please document for each pseudo-header in which addr...@bugs.debian.org it can be used)
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:33:19 +0200 with message-id <26187.35167.456859.239...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #805451, regarding Bugs/Reporting: please document for each pseudo-header in which addr...@bugs.debian.org it can be used to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 805451: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805451 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hello, whenever I want to use pseudoheaders in bug interaction I find myself missing a reference documentation of them, stating what they do, their exact syntax, and which are accepted by which part of the BTS. For example, can I use Version when I mail to -d...@bugs.debian.org? https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing says that I can, but https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#pseudoheader does not mention it. Can I use Control: when I mail n...@bugs.debian.org? https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#control it documents in which address it can be used, and I find it very useful. Can I use Tags: when I mail n...@bugs.debian.org? I cannot find a mention of it, and I do not know where to look. Most times I want to interact with the BTS and Do Things Right The First Time, I end up asking such questions to #debian-devel and feeling frustrated for the need of asking such apparent trivialities. I wish there was a coincise reference to them: it would help me greatly. Thank you, Enrico -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Closing since noone worked on thisfor years and it will likely not happen. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#317140: marked as done (Display the license for Debian books)
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:15:43 +0200 with message-id <26187.34111.815771.952...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #317140, regarding Display the license for Debian books to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 317140: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=317140 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 08:08:29PM +0200, Mauro Darida wrote: > I would suggest to indicate, for each book, the license under which is sent > to > publication. This would save time about getting information on proprietary > books (i.e the one from Martin F. Kraft) Thanks for the suggestion. I've sent this message to the bug tracking system so that it doesn't get lost. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Sorry, that we did not replied to your contribution. But we have change a lot on the web pages since then and noone managed to add this info. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#911896: marked as done (Review, update and document the mail setup of www.debian.org-related addresses)
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:07:20 +0200 with message-id <26187.33608.813613.154...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #911896, regarding Review, update and document the mail setup of www.debian.org-related addresses to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 911896: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911896 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Dear all In bug #911605 it was suggested that maybe our setup should be public and versioned. I think it's a good idea. Not sure if I can put time on this in the short term, so for now I'm filing the bug. Maybe other people can comment and/or act on it. I have no clear proposal in my mind, I'm all ears :-) Some of the places to look at: https://salsa.debian.org/dsa-team/mirror/email-virtualdomains/blob/master/debian.org/aliases www-master.debian.org:/srv/www.debian.org/mail/aliases www-master.debian.org:/srv/www.debian.org/mail/.mailfilter https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cgi/tree/master/cgi-bin https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/ and of course the places in webwml repo where those addresses are mentioned. Kind regards -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- The mail setup is not public, only DD may access it. Therefore closing. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#742266: marked as done (www.debian.org: "Help Debian" webpage is not very helpful)
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:02:39 +0200 with message-id <26187.33327.681454.731...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #608400, regarding www.debian.org: "Help Debian" webpage is not very helpful to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 608400: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608400 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Last week, during the MiniConf in Barcelona, the issue of newcomers being lost arised a few times. There are numerous efforts underway to attract new contributors, but it seems we're falling short at retaining some of them when they first approach the project. The "Help Debian" webpage is a place where many potential contributors will try to find a way to help, but it has many issues. First of all, it is badly organised and not very attractive to read. I think it should be structured in a different way. I think a good idea would be to spli the tasks in different levels of difficulty, separating technical and non-technical, etc. Also, point no 7 is ridiculous: are we actually suggesting a newbie to bootstrap a port?? That definitely needs to be removed :) Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (50, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This was never implemented, so closing. Since we restructred this page a lot the proposed change is obsolete. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#608400: marked as done (re-organize how to contribute documentation "per-profile")
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 19:02:39 +0200 with message-id <26187.33327.681454.731...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #608400, regarding re-organize how to contribute documentation "per-profile" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 608400: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608400 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Out of curiosity in response to various DPL inquiries about "how can I help Debian?", I've reviewed a bit the various pieces of documentation on the subject and compared it with what other distros do. A remarkable difference seems to be a "per-profile" organization of the available material, i.e. organizing the "how to contribute" page with a top-level distinction among, say: developers, translators, bug triager, artists, donors, etc. I believe there is some value in such a distinction, simply because the users interested into helping out usually knows pretty well what they are able and willing to do. I hence suggest to reorganize the content of http://www.debian.org/intro/help according to the various profiles. Just for reference, here a few links to what others (random sampling, not necessarily representative) have been doing in that respect: - Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/en/join-fedora (scrolling a bit down) - Ubuntu: http://www.ubuntu.com/community - OpenSUSE: http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:How_to_participate Thanks a lot for maintaining www.d.o, Cheers. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This was never implemented, so closing. Since we restructred this page a lot the proposed change is obsolete. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#932252: marked as done (cleanup of /intro/organization)
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 18:58:03 +0200 with message-id <26187.33051.262637.879...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #932252, regarding cleanup of /intro/organization to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 932252: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932252 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org I like to clean up /intro/organization, esp. remove some content. We have to much content on this page, much old and outdated content. We could move some content to other pages. My suggestion is: - remove item Development Projects - remove item Individual Packages — @packages.debian.org , since the page it links to will be removed - remove the whole Ports — GNU/Linux section. These are only links to mailing list. - maybe move the mailing list under User support to /support - Debian women lists some members that left the Debian project years ago. ping someone to update the members list. - remove item Consultants Page - remove item CD Vendors Page - remove item LDAP Developer Directory Administrator - remove item Package Tracking System - remove move section Debian Pure Blends. IMO blends are like ports. It's not a suborganization of Debian, and there's no need to list people involved in it. -- regards Thomas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- I've cleaned the most important things. Therefore closing. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#772822: marked as done ("please also mention SUAs and d-s-a@l.d.o on wwww.debian.org")
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 18:59:45 +0200 with message-id <26187.33153.260827.455...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #772822, regarding "please also mention SUAs and d-s-a@l.d.o on .debian.org" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 772822: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772822 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: security-tracker Severity: wishlist DLAs include a "Source" field that simply says "Debian LTS Team". It would be nice if, like DSAs, the "Source" field linked to a source of further information, like the mailing list archive or the Debian website or to the security tracker SVN/git repository. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DLA-55-1 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-3020-1 -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- The DLA list now link to the original annoouncement mail and the security tracker. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#1071157: www.debian.org: securing debian manual: broken links
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 harden-doc Bug #1071157 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: securing debian manual: broken links Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'harden-doc'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1071157 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1071157 to the same values previously set -- 1071157: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071157 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: severity of 924139 is important
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 924139 important Bug #924139 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: migrate from python to python3 Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 924139: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924139 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#905440: marked as done (www.debian.org: remove "last modified" from footer)
Your message dated Sun, 12 May 2024 23:14:32 +0200 with message-id <26177.12600.110594.747...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #905440, regarding www.debian.org: remove "last modified" from footer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 905440: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905440 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org In the footer of every page we list the date the page was last modified. Currently this information is completly useless, because it does not show a correct date. e.g. https://www.debian.org/women/ Last Modified: Fri, Jun 1 18:42:17 UTC 2018 Let's look into the git log: The last commit on index.wml was in 2014, which only changed http to https, so no real content change. In fact, the content didn't changed since 2012 and may be out of date. Please just remove this useless information from every page. -- regards Thomas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, the mtime of all wml files are now fixed and therefore the last modified time in the footer is correct. I did this on www-master: $ cd /srv/www.debian.org/webwml/ $ git restore-mtime --skip-missing --no-directories -v |& tee > ../cron/log/git-restore-mtime.log -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#825044: marked as done (www.d.o: please copy the new autopkgtext.txt from debian-policy into the website)
Your message dated Sat, 11 May 2024 23:10:39 +0200 with message-id <26175.57039.61.12...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #825044, regarding www.d.o: please copy the new autopkgtext.txt from debian-policy into the website to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 825044: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825044 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- package: www.debian.org So, since debian-policy 3.9.7 there is a document describing autopkgtest. I'd like having this reachable through www.d.o as all the other policy documents already are. Julien Cristau pointed me to http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/parts/7doc#n314 So I'm going to guess that's all needed is some addition to that script. I don't have a particular opinion on where this/these file(s) should be. Thanks in advance. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- I've added the autopkgtest.txt to the web pages and a link on www.d.o/devel This will be available in a few hours after the next build of this web page. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#998672: marked as done (packages.debian.org: all arch:all packages have empty filelist)
Your message dated Tue, 7 May 2024 21:08:08 -0400 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#998672: packages.debian.org: all arch:all packages have empty filelist has caused the Debian Bug report #998672, regarding packages.debian.org: all arch:all packages have empty filelist to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 998672: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998672 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: mo...@debian.org Hello, i think this problem has been going on for quite a while (months): all arch:all packages have empty filelist, f.e. https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/python3-poetry-core/filelist please have a look as that piece of data is really useful. Thanks, Sandro --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Looks like the filelist is fine now, closing this bug. Thanks, Boyuan Yang--- End Message ---
Bug#1070391: marked as done (wiki.debian.org: spelling error: This command backup all height key-slots)
Your message dated Sun, 05 May 2024 14:50:52 -0400 with message-id <408132f4a3fafa8f40ee32c7943057bebc12f532.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1070391: wiki.debian.org: spelling error: This command backup all height key-slots has caused the Debian Bug report #1070391, regarding wiki.debian.org: spelling error: This command backup all height key-slots to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1070391: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070391 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, on page https://wiki.debian.org/LVM it says "This command backup all height key-slots" I'd like to suggest that the text is changed to: "This command backs up all eight key-slots" --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 17:59 +, Yngve Spjeld-Landro wrote: > Package: wiki.debian.org > Severity: minor > > Dear Maintainer, > > on page https://wiki.debian.org/LVM it says "This command backup all > height > key-slots" > > I'd like to suggest that the text is changed to: "This command backs up > all > eight key-slots" The typo has been fixed. Just a reminder, anyone can edit the Debian Wiki contents. Next time if you find an issue on the Wiki, please register a Debian Wiki account and directly do the modification. Thanks, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message ---
Bug#1007805: marked as done (wiki.debian.org: Wiki treats a Mastodon address like an email address)
Your message dated Fri, 3 May 2024 15:06:08 +0200 with message-id and subject line not reproducible, likely fixed upstream has caused the Debian Bug report #1007805, regarding wiki.debian.org: Wiki treats a Mastodon address like an email address to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1007805: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007805 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: upstream https://wiki.debian.org/Russell%20Coker I just added my Mastodon address to my page and it is interpreted as an email address. I think that a pattern like @[a-z0-9]@[a-z0-9] should be exempt from the rules about automatically making a mailto. Also it would probably be good for the template for a user home page to suggest addresses for Mastodon and Diaspora. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- hi, looking at https://wiki.debian.org/Russell Coker, your mastodon address is now rendered correctly as a link. I guess that the issue has been fixed upstream--- End Message ---
Bug#1069884: marked as done (Document acronym "ITA" on https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/)
Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:20:33 + with message-id <662ee7d1b2f53_213419960-...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1069884 fixed in www.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1069884, regarding Document acronym "ITA" on https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1069884: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069884 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@rocketjump.eu Hi, it would be nice to document "ITA" on https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ along with the other acronyms like O/RFA/RFH/ITP/RFP. I'm guessing it means "intent to adopt"? It's mentioned in the removing tables entries, but that's not helpful to see which tags are available. Greets, Lee --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, Bug #1069884 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/9d50d212081566bba3064fb1532996d817aeeac9 devel/wnpp/: Document acronym "ITA". (Closes: #1069884) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1069884--- End Message ---
Bug#1017109: marked as done (issue building the /*/devel/website/stats/*.wml files with Debian 11's wml version)
Your message dated Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:44:15 +0200 with message-id <26154.24111.36693.800...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #1017109, regarding issue building the /*/devel/website/stats/*.wml files with Debian 11's wml version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1017109: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017109 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org User: www.debian@packages.debian.org Usertag: scripts Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org Hello all After upgrading www-master from Debian 10 buster (wml 2.12.2) to Debian 11 bullseye (wml 2.32.0), we're experiencing an issue when building the stats files for the website: make[4]: Entering directory '/srv/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/website/stats' wml -q -D CUR_YEAR=2022 -o UNDEFuEN:ar.en.html@g+w -D CUR_LANG=English -D CUR_ISO_LANG=en -D CUR_LOCALE=en_US.UTF-8 -D CHARSET=utf-8 \ ../../../../english/devel/website/stats/ar.wml ePerl:Error: Perl runtime error (interpreter rc=2) Contents of STDERR channel: - couldn't open ./../../../../index.wml or /srv/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/website/stats/../../../../index.wml: No such file or directory Died at /tmp/kZRxwsy3aN/wml.tmp1 line 747. -- ** WML:Break: Error in Pass 3 (rc=1). Died at /usr/share/wml/TheWML/Frontends/Wml/Runner.pm line 402. TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner::_run_pass(TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner=HASH(0x55c872bf8850), 3, SCALAR(0x55c8731471c8), REF(0x55c873147198), REF(0x55c8731471b0)) called at /usr/share/wml/TheWML/Frontends/Wml/Runner.pm line 440 TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner::_passes_loop(TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner=HASH(0x55c872bf8850)) called at /usr/share/wml/TheWML/Frontends/Wml/Runner.pm line 727 TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner::_output_and_cleanup(TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner=HASH(0x55c872bf8850)) called at /usr/share/wml/TheWML/Frontends/Wml/Runner.pm line 932 TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner::run_with_ARGV(TheWML::Frontends::Wml::Runner=HASH(0x55c872bf8850), HASH(0x55c872df9390)) called at /usr/bin/wml line 47 make[4]: *** [Makefile:33: ar.en.html] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory '/srv/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/website/stats' make[3]: [../../../Makefile.common:84: stats-install] Error 2 (ignored) make[3]: Leaving directory '/srv/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/website' The error happens with all the files in the "stats" folder, in all the languages. I have checked that the source wml files (created with the script stattrans.pl) are similar with buster and bullseye. It seems the problem is in how the file is referenced when passed to wml: if I try to build the file like this: wml -q -D CUR_YEAR=2022 -o UNDEFuEN:ar.en.html@g+w -D CUR_LANG=English -D CUR_ISO_LANG=en -D CUR_LOCALE=en_US.UTF-8 -D CHARSET=utf-8 ar.wml then it builds fine. If I try wml -q -D CUR_YEAR=2022 -o UNDEFuEN:ar.en.html@g+w -D CUR_LANG=English -D CUR_ISO_LANG=en -D CUR_LOCALE=en_US.UTF-8 -D CHARSET=utf-8 ../stats/ar.wml again it builds fine, the same with ../../../devel/website/stats/ar.wml but it fails when the file is referenced as "../../../../english/devel/website/stats/ar.wml" I am not sure if this happens because with that path are two .wmlrc files involved, or because the new wml version is buggy about how it handles long relative paths. For now, I suggest to workaround the issue changing the corresponding line in the english/devel/website/stats/Makefile: -%.$(LANGUAGE).html: $(ENGLISHDIR)/$(CUR_DIR)/%.wml $(LOCALEDIR)/stats.mo | $(VCSREVCACHE) +%.$(LANGUAGE).html: %.wml $(LOCALEDIR)/stats.mo | $(VCSREVCACHE) then the English folders builds fine, but we would need to create symbolic links in the other languages /devel/website/stats, in a similar way as it was done with the sitemap.wml in bug #924172, so they can be built too. I don't know how to do this, though, I've added this code to /english/devel/website/stats/Makefile: ifneq "$(LANGUAGE)" "en" %.wml: $(shell ln -s $(ENGLISHDIR)/$(CUR_DIR)/*.wml .) endif prior to the %.$(LANGUAGE).html recipe, and it seems it works for all languages except Chinese (variants): wml -q -D CUR_YEAR=2022 -O1 -o UNDEFuZH@uCNuCNHKuCNTW:ar.zh-cn.html.tmp@g+w -o UNDEFuZH@uHKuCNHKuHKTWuTWHK:ar.zh-hk.html.tmp@g+w -o UNDEFuZH@uTWuCNTWuHKTWuTWHK:ar.zh-t w.html.tmp@g+w --prolo
Bug#863647: marked as done (use LDAP to generate www.debian.org/intro/organization page (or at least, part of it))
Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:26:59 +0200
with message-id <26153.27411.53763.690...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #863647,
regarding use LDAP to generate www.debian.org/intro/organization page (or at
least, part of it)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
863647: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863647
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
We have some info stored in the Debian LDAP, about people belonging to
groups, that could be used to generate (and keep updated
automatically) the /intro/organization page.
Adapting a script written by Paul Wise (thanks!), and running it from
a debian.org machine (e.g. people.debian.org), I can obtain the list
of, for example, Publicity Team delegates (see attached script
ldap_dump.py)..
We would need to know the gid or supplementaryGid of each of the teams
that we want to generate.
Then we would need to compare the list of groups/people that we can
obtain from LDAP, with the current list that we have in
/intro/organization. To take into account: some teams have no
corresponding LDAP group, e.g. Technical Committee.
Then, adapt the current organization.data file to insert the
corresponding scripting parts for the data that we obtain via LDAP
(not sure if we can insert Python scripts in the wml files, but
probably we can write similar code in Perl).
Leaving this here for now, I may return to advance this later in the
year, if nobody beats me to it.
Cheers
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
#!/usr/bin/python
# Author: Paul Wise
# Author: Laura Arjona Reina
# License: MIT/Expat
import os
import sys
import ldap
aliases = []
l = ldap.initialize('ldaps://db.debian.org')
r = l.search_s('dc=debian,dc=org',ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE,'(supplementaryGid=publicity)',['gecos'])
aliases.append('Publicity Team')
for dn,e in r:
aliases.append(' Member: %s' % e['gecos'][0])
del l, r
with open(os.path.expanduser('./debian-teams'), 'w') as f:
f.write('\n'.join(aliases))
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Obtaining the data from LDAP does not help, because also the LDAP data
is not up to date. We often have inactive members belonging to some
team/LDAP group for years after they went inactive.
Paul mentioned in another bug that some team members (I think it was
the wiki team) were not added to the wiki contact mail alias. So
having them in a list makes no sense.
--
regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#821096: marked as done (filenames of generated by parse-advisory.pl and parse-dls.pl files should include the revision number)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:18:06 +0200 with message-id <26153.26878.499420.858...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #821096, regarding filenames of generated by parse-advisory.pl and parse-dls.pl files should include the revision number to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 821096: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821096 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Security Team issues revisions of DSAs, e. g. DSA-3485-1 and DSA-3485-2, but currently parse-advisory cannot handle revisions file-wise. That is, it creates dsa-3485.wml for the original DSA, but it is not so easy to create a revision when the latter is issued, because file dsa-3485.wml already exists. So, someone needs to, say, rename dsa-3485.wml, use parse-advisory to create a source page for the revision, then rename both wml files: the original DSA and its revision. To avoid that parse-advisory should add the revision number to filename of generated wml file. Sometimes (like in dsa-3485-1 and dsa-3485-2 case) it is not so easy to change the text of dsa-3485 in such a way that it would include both the original DSA and its revision, so it's better to store them in separate files. Cheers! Lev Lamberov -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- These scripts are not used any more. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#583781: marked as done (Please provide only one item by DPN issue for News/weekly RSS)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:16:54 +0200 with message-id <26153.26806.525741.717...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #583781, regarding Please provide only one item by DPN issue for News/weekly RSS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 583781: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583781 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Heya, it would be great to have a RSS and/or Atom feed for the news section of the Debian homepage (and possibly a different one for the advisories listed there too). I know it's stuff one can already follow via mailing list(s), but a lot of people these days uses feeds directly, I think we can offer a service to more users offering both. Now, I've written before helpers that generate RSS, and I'm willing to contribute one for this specific case. Nevertheless the README files under News/ are a bit scary in stating that only press/webmasters should fiddle with them, so I'm looking for advice. Where can a script that generates RSS/Atom (and commits it?) can be hooked at in the process of maintaining the HTML listing of news on the website homepage? An alternative less invasive solution would be to have a separate script elsewhere checking out periodically from CVS the News/ directory, generate the RSS feed, and have it referenced from the homepage. That would work, wouldn't be that much at stake with feed technology (which does pull anyhow), but somehow doesn't feel "right". Any hint? Thanks for maintaining www.d.o! -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Just closing this very old wishlist. We only had discussion about it, but noone worked on this. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#905422: marked as done (Avoid hard-coding the version numbers of FHS)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:05:51 +0200 with message-id <26153.26143.765941.208...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #905422, regarding Avoid hard-coding the version numbers of FHS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 905422: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905422 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Dear debian website developers, New Debian Policy has updated Debian's FHS version from v2.3 to v3.0. The corresponding FHS version under www.debian.org needs to be updated too. https://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#policy -- Regards, Boyuan Yang -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.17.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=zh_CN:zh (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- The current FHS version is only used once in this document. I see no problem in not using a variable for that. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#612274: marked as done (www.debian.org: RSS feed for News contains same timestamp for multiple entries posted on the same day)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:56:00 +0200 with message-id <26153.25552.726089.531...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #612274, regarding www.debian.org: RSS feed for News contains same timestamp for multiple entries posted on the same day to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 612274: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612274 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The RSS feed at http://www.debian.org/News/news contains the same timestamp for 2 news posted the same day. This is somewhat annoying for tools like feed2omb which rely on the timestamp of the last article they forwarded to decide whether something needs to be forwarded or not. They will forward the first one and then consider the second one to not be newer (this is because I don't allow feed2omb to post 2 articles in the same run). It would thus be nice to use different timestamps. Just increment the timestamp arbitrarily in this situation. Cheers, -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This bug has no activity since many years. It seems that it's not a problem for anyone these days. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#872944: marked as done (www.debian.org: Remove JavaScript from Policy Manual published on web mirrors)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:52:17 +0200 with message-id <26153.25329.121588.795...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #872944, regarding www.debian.org: Remove JavaScript from Policy Manual published on web mirrors to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 872944: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872944 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: important Hello webmasters, The Debian Policy Manual just changed its HTML output and while the HTML has published, the CSS and included images have not. Looking at [1], the CSS and included images should have been published because they're still installed to /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/. So I think this is a problem on your end rather than ours. Please do reassign this bug if I'm wrong about that, and thanks in advance for your help. [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/parts/7doc -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This bug is about removing JS from the policy manual. This is not needed, therefore closing. If you like to discuss if a single page version is needed, please reopen #877337. -- viele Grüße Thomas--- End Message ---
Processed: reassign 1069758 to release-notes
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # www.debian.org/.../release-notes/... > reassign 1069758 release-notes Bug #1069758 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: upgrade procedure instructs users to run “apt update” but neglects upgrading Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'release-notes'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1069758 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1069758 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1069758: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#863579: marked as done (www.debian.org: include wiki team in /intro/organization)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:18:58 +0200 with message-id <26153.5330.271446.253...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #863579, regarding www.debian.org: include wiki team in /intro/organization to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 863579: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863579 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal It would be nice to include the wiki team members in /intro/organization, as well as the mail contact. Nor https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Contact nor https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianWiki list people names, so people in the wiki team should say if they want to appear there and provide the list of names, positions, and mail addresses to list. -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.8 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- IMO it's not needed and the discussion also shows that the LDAP information is not up to date. So having a list of people which are not receiving the emails makes no sense. And my experiences clearly shows that updating such a list is not done. This is similar to experiences with lists in /intro/organisation Therefore closing. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Processed (with 1 error): Reassign to package release-notes
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 release-notes Bug #1069417 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: upgrade procedure instructs users to run “apt update” but neglects upgrading Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'release-notes'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1069417 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1069417 to the same values previously set > thanks Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. -- 1069417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069417 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#877337: marked as done (www.debian.org: Switch back to single page version of Policy Manual)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:21:37 +0200 with message-id <26135.36737.787967.779...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #877337, regarding www.debian.org: Switch back to single page version of Policy Manual to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 877337: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877337 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello www-team, One of the improvements for which we switched Debian Policy to build with Sphinx was the ability to output the Policy Manual as a single HTML page. Previously, it was only possible to output the Policy Manual as a number of interlinked HTML pages. We (the active Policy Team members) think that the single page version is more suitable for Debian's web mirrors. This is because it is more useful for newcomers: with the single page version, it is possible to use your browser's search function to search across the entire document. More experienced users, who want the multi-page version, probably have the debian-policy package installed locally. When we uploaded Policy 4.1.0.0, this had the effect of switching the version of the Policy Manual published on the web mirrors from multi-page to single page. But this was because we screwed up the installed paths (see #872895). With Policy 4.1.1.0, we've fixed the paths, and so the version of the Policy Manual published on the web mirrors has reverted to the multi-page version. Please revert this, so the single page version is published on our web mirrors. Here is a patch (against [1]; unfortunately, I'm not in a position to test it). I'd appreciate it if this change could be made quickly, to avoid URLs to the multi page version ending up in too many mailing list posts/other documents. @@ -392,7 +392,8 @@ echo -n "Installing documents:" # Debian Policy Manual unpack debian-policy mvdocs debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy NO en / policy -mvhtml_sphinx debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html NO en / +mvhtml_sphinx debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy-1.html NO en / +mv -f $webdocdir/debian-policy/policy-1.html $webdocdir/debian-policy/index.html mvdocs fhs usr/share/doc/debian-policy/fhs NO en packaging-manuals/ fhs-2.3 mvhtml fhs usr/share/doc/debian-policy/fhs NO en packaging-manuals/ fhs-2.3 [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/parts/7doc -- Sean Whitton From dcb0c69aa246e8076f79d6838cd7eec34d57b815 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Whitton Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:33:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Publish single page version of Debian Policy Manual --- parts/7doc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/parts/7doc b/parts/7doc index 4917094..8905599 100755 --- a/parts/7doc +++ b/parts/7doc @@ -392,7 +392,8 @@ echo -n "Installing documents:" # Debian Policy Manual unpack debian-policy mvdocs debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy NO en / policy -mvhtml_sphinx debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html NO en / +mvhtml_sphinx debian-policy usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy-1.html NO en / +mv -f $webdocdir/debian-policy/policy-1.html $webdocdir/debian-policy/index.html mvdocs fhs usr/share/doc/debian-policy/fhs NO en packaging-manuals/ fhs-2.3 mvhtml fhs usr/share/doc/debian-policy/fhs NO en packaging-manuals/ fhs-2.3 -- 2.14.1 signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- We now have a multi page html version including search functionality on our web page. I like to terminate this old (7 years) discussion if single or multi page is more suitable for our users. Let's use what available and focus on more important topics. We also have single page txt and a PDF version. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#987943: marked as done (www.debian.org: Developers Reference: Sphinx search non-functional: searchindex.js missing)
Your message dated Tue, 9 Apr 2024 23:22:29 +0200 with message-id <20240409232229.0d4df7c0cf2decfaf861b...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#987943: www.debian.org: Developers Reference: Sphinx search non-functional: searchindex.js missing has caused the Debian Bug report #987943, regarding www.debian.org: Developers Reference: Sphinx search non-functional: searchindex.js missing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 987943: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987943 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Sphinx search is broken on the developers reference: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/searchindex.js is 404. SR --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, Holger Wansing wrote (Mon, 8 Apr 2024 00:35:46 +0200): > Everything works fine there as far a I see (with a desktop firefox and brave > browser, as well as with the mobile versions of those browsers on my > smartphone). > Feel free to test with more browsers/platforms/whatever. > > I guess I will need to trim the 7doc script once again - h ... This is done now. debian-policy on debian.org/doc is fine as it is now. See commits 3462a061, a2262ec9 and ae8aa074 on https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/commits/master/parts/7doc?ref_type=heads So, we know now what is needed, to get it this far (aka: get the search function working and make the html theme work on big (desktop pcs) and small (smartphone) screens: We need javascript functionality from the packages libjs-sphinxdoc and libjs-jquery. Without these, the above funtions will not work. I brought it this far, to make sure of this fact. I will close this bug now. Whether javascript will stay active on debian.org website will need to be decided. I will follow up regarding this topic on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872944 Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---
Processed: merging 997077 1039982
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 997077 1039982 Bug #997077 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: can't download archives due to Mixed Content Bug #1039982 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: Cannot download package source files due to mixed content URL Merged 997077 1039982 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1039982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039982 997077: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997077 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1053549: marked as done (Create a Debian theme for documentation based in Sphinx (reStructuredText))
Your message dated Sun, 7 Apr 2024 13:00:43 +0200 with message-id <20240407130043.894c57d79acee013d4dda...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1053549: Create a Debian theme for documentation based in Sphinx (reStructuredText) has caused the Debian Bug report #1053549, regarding Create a Debian theme for documentation based in Sphinx (reStructuredText) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1053549: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053549 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal User: debian-www@lists.debian.org Usertags: design X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org,design-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net. Dear website, documentation and design teams, Several documentation manuals are being generated now using ReStructuredText and Sphinx, and it would be nice that a Debian theme in Sphinx is created and used to match our docs appearance with the Debian website colours etc. Currently in the website we publish, at least: * Debian Policy: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ * Debian Developers Reference: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/index.en.html * Testing Release notes: currently in https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/release-notes/ but that may change The upstream documentation about theming is here: http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/theming.html Please take into account that currently the machine www-master where the website is built runs bullseye (sphinx version: 3.4.3-2, but at some time it will be upgraded to bookworm (sphinx version: 5.3.0-4). Kind regards -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, Laura Arjona Reina wrote (Fri, 6 Oct 2023 09:35:09 +0200): > Several documentation manuals are being generated now using > ReStructuredText and Sphinx, and it would be nice that a Debian theme in > Sphinx is created and used to match our docs appearance with the Debian > website colours etc. Thanks to Stéphane Blondon, we have a nice Debian theme for Sphinx now, and I managed to get it to the website in the end so far, currently visible at debian-policy: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/index.html I had to deal with some missing javascript files as well, to make the sidebar appear/disappear on small screens like smartphones, but that works now. The only thing which is not working currently, is the search functionality, but since that's not theme-specific I guess (please correct me, if I'm wrong), I close this bug. Javascript leaves some open issues, but for those I will follow-up on some existing javascript bugs, we already have for the website/manuals. Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---
Bug#1064593: marked as done (debian-policy: missing static resources for www.debian.org policy page)
Your message dated Thu, 04 Apr 2024 19:51:23 + with message-id <660f04bbdfb33_1408bb94c-...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1064593 fixed in www.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1064593, regarding debian-policy: missing static resources for www.debian.org policy page to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1064593: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064593 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: debian-policy Version: 4.6.2.1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: spwhit...@spwhitton.name, hwans...@mailbox.org, debian-www@lists.debian.org (this may relate closely to #915583) Some of the web resources referenced by the online[1] copy of the Debian policy manual seem to return HTTP 404 responses at the moment, meaning that the intended Sphinx CSS theming fails to apply. [1] - https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, Bug #1064593 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/commit/397fb61dee41a4bb09c4ec6c7bbc40f0087aab33 Allow documents to use new html theme (based on readthedocs.org theme). Closes: #1064593. (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1064593--- End Message ---
Bug#1068152: marked as done (Pre-installed vendors list contains broken links)
Your message dated Wed, 03 Apr 2024 09:50:28 + with message-id <660d26641f709_1408bb94c-...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1068152 fixed in www.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1068152, regarding Pre-installed vendors list contains broken links to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1068152: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Dear www team, The list of computer vendors that pre-install Debian found at /distrib/pre-installed [1] contains broken links and outdated entries of companies that do not exist anymore. Specifically, here is a list of entries I suggest be *removed*, grouped by region as they appear on the page (note that all of these links are broken in some way): - Canada: JCCSS (Jeremy Carter's Computer Service and Sales) Reason: website is down - Costa Rica: Luis-Alberto Montero Reason: domain was sold to another party - Germany: Sanux.de Reason: website seems to have been lost - Germany: Xtops.DE Reason: website is not functional - Italy: Binario Etico Reason: website down - Mexico: GOLIARDOS TECHNOLOGY S.A. de C.V. Reason: website down - Poland: Scrascom Komputery Poleasingowe Reason: website down - Switzerland: FOX Elektronix - Fux Reason: website down - United States: Psychsoftpc Reason: website down Additionally, here is a list of entries I suggest be *modified*, along with their modification and justification: - India: NaveenGanesan.com Change: Update link to https://naveenganesan.com/naveenlinux Reason: Old link leads to a 404; website owner updated the location of their Debian page from /computing to /naveenlinux - Netherlands: SnaakSystems Changes: 1) Update link to https://novacustom.com 2) Update email to i...@novacustom.com 3) Update 1st line of address to NovaCustom (the rest of the address is still valid) Reason: rebranding (domain was updated from laptopzelfsamenstellen.nl to novacustom.com) [1] https://www.debian.org/distrib/pre-installed Cheers, Justin --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, Bug #1068152 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/8ccf3ed2c06d878349dd52dcecd4b726d603d383 fix links, Closes: #1068152 (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1068152--- End Message ---
Processed: affects 1064593
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1064593 debian-policy Bug #1064593 [www.debian.org] debian-policy: missing static resources for www.debian.org policy page Added indication that 1064593 affects debian-policy > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1064593: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064593 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: issue with Debian-style html theme for sphinx-based documents
Processing control commands: > reassign 1064593 www.debian.org Bug #1064593 [debian-policy] debian-policy: missing static resources for www.debian.org policy page Bug reassigned from package 'debian-policy' to 'www.debian.org'. No longer marked as found in versions debian-policy/4.6.2.1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1064593 to the same values previously set -- 1064593: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064593 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1068151: marked as done (Pre-installed vendors list contains broken links)
Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:47:56 + (UTC) with message-id <9489a182-e124-46da-bf5c-b209aae47...@me.com> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #1068151, regarding Pre-installed vendors list contains broken links to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1068151: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068151 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Dear www team, The list of computer vendors that pre-install Debian found at /distrib/pre-installed [1] contains broken links and outdated entries of companies that do not exist anymore. Specifically, here is a list of entries I suggest be *removed*, grouped by region as they appear on the page (note that all of these links are broken in some way): - Canada: JCCSS (Jeremy Carter's Computer Service and Sales) Reason: website is down - Costa Rica: Luis-Alberto Montero Reason: domain was sold to another party - Germany: Sanux.de Reason: website seems to have been lost - Germany: Xtops.DE Reason: website is not functional - Italy: Binario Etico Reason: website down - Mexico: GOLIARDOS TECHNOLOGY S.A. de C.V. Reason: website down - Poland: Scrascom Komputery Poleasingowe Reason: website down - Switzerland: FOX Elektronix - Fux Reason: website down - United States: Psychsoftpc Reason: website down Additionally, here is a list of entries I suggest be *modified*, along with their modification and justification: - India: NaveenGanesan.com Change: Update link to https://naveenganesan.com/naveenlinux Reason: Old link leads to a 404; website owner updated the location of their Debian page from /computing to /naveenlinux - Netherlands: SnaakSystems Changes: 1) Update link to https://novacustom.com 2) Update email to i...@novacustom.com 3) Update 1st line of address to NovaCustom (the rest of the address is still valid) Reason: rebranding (domain was updated from laptopzelfsamenstellen.nl to novacustom.com ) [1] https://www.debian.org/distrib/pre-installed Cheers, Justin--- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- There was a mistake in formatting the bug; please ignore it.--- End Message ---
Bug#1067649: marked as done (Verification page is not accessible from the homepage)
Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:06:55 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1067649: Verification page is not accessible from the homepage has caused the Debian Bug report #1067649, regarding Verification page is not accessible from the homepage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067649: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067649 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Dear www and CD teams, When the Download link in our homepage was changed to start the iso download right away, the old download page [1] became inaccessible (at least not easily-accessible), making it very hard to find the verification page [2]. I could only find it clicking on "other downloads", then "Download mirrors", and scrolling up until the top of the page, where a menu appears on the right, containing the link to the verify page (I guess many of our users would totally miss it!). My suggestion would be to replace the line "other downloads" with 2 separate links side-by-side: "verify authenticity" | "check all download options" And incorporate the content of the old download page into those 2 targets, the verify and "Getting Debian" page [3] (current target of other downloads). [1] https://www.debian.org/download [2] https://www.debian.org/CD/verify [3] https://www.debian.org/distrib/ Cheers, Tassia. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Thanks, Thomas! I think we can close this bug for now. Link renaming could be done in a later moment, when the website content is being reorganized. Cheers, Tassia.--- End Message ---
Bug#1067955: marked as done (www.debian.org: Unclear why "Ubunut keyserver" is used in this description)
Your message dated Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:57:56 -0400 with message-id <04edd6e3d5814a0b2e8334d48a99171aad318415.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1067955: www.debian.org: Unclear why "Ubunut keyserver" is used in this description has caused the Debian Bug report #1067955, regarding www.debian.org: Unclear why "Ubunut keyserver" is used in this description to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067955: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067955 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal This is about this page: https://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html In the end of that page "keyserver.ubuntu.com" is used as a key server. But page is about Debian. This section should make clear why Ubuntu is involved here and if it needs to be that way. Kind Christian --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 13:06 +, Christian Buhtz wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: normal > > This is about this page: > > https://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html > > In the end of that page "keyserver.ubuntu.com" is used as a key server. > But > page is about Debian. This section should make clear why Ubuntu is > involved > here and if it needs to be that way. The bottom of the page says: To report a problem with information provided in this specific web page e-mail keyring-ma...@debian.org . Please report your issue to the correct place. The www.debian.org pseudopackage (or the Debian WWW Team) is not responsible to contents on keyring.debian.org. As a side note, the keyring-maint person may or may not make changes to that webpage. Nothing on that page states that "this page is about Debian", and using the Ubuntu keyserver is not wrong. According to my knowledge, something magic happens behind the scene and explaining "the magic" would be out of scope of what https://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html should be describing. Given the information above, I am closing this bug report. Thanks, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message ---
Bug#1067939: marked as done (wiki.debian.org: Move "ITP" page into Developers Reference (or decide against it))
Your message dated Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:42:59 +0100 (CET) with message-id <90a8add2-2337-9c8c-bef8-a58af5a02...@sourcepole.ch> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #1067939, regarding wiki.debian.org: Move "ITP" page into Developers Reference (or decide against it) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067939: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067939 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainers, My request is about this wiki page: <https://wiki.debian.org/ITP> The first paragraph say that this content should be moved into the Developers Reference. I am not experienced enough to do it nor to decide it. I put the Dev Ref people into CC. Finishing such TODO comments and also removing them from the Wiki will IMHO increase the professional image of Debian itself. Thanks in advance, Christian Buhtz --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- My request is about this wiki page: <https://wiki.debian.org/ITP> The first paragraph say that this content should be moved into the Developers Reference. I am not experienced enough to do it nor to decide it. I put the Dev Ref people into CC. Finishing such TODO comments and also removing them from the Wiki will IMHO increase the professional image of Debian itself. Might be that it would increase the professional image of Debian or it might not. But is "increasing the professional image of Debian" something Debian wants or some priority and that Debian has some kind of common understanding or policy of for the Wiki? What the TODOs are good for however, and what the author of the todos probably wanted to achieve and why he added them to the wiki page is: * those TODOs serve to memorize that something should be done * they serve as an incentive for other people to fix things * so one can argue that they help to improve Debian Since the content of the wiki is not something that gets fixed via bug reports (but by fixing it via the wiki) I suggest to go and fix the problem that the TODO mentions and not to create tickets about TODOs. Therefore closing this bug report. *t--- End Message ---
Bug#1067949: marked as done (www.debian.org: No language selection on "www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/")
Your message dated Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:53:34 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1067949: www.debian.org: No language selection on "www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/" has caused the Debian Bug report #1067949, regarding www.debian.org: No language selection on "www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067949: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067949 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: 924889-subscr...@bugs.debian.org Hello, this is about <https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/> There is no option to select the language of that document. I always see the translated version (in my case German). But I want to see the original of course. I am aware that I can manipulate the URL but that is not a solution just a workaround. The footer do not offer other languages like some other debian.org pages do. Kind Christian Buhtz --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Am 29. März 2024 12:22:29 MEZ schrieb Christian Buhtz : <https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/> > >There is no option to select the language of that document. I always see the >translated version (in my case German). But I want to see the original of >course. For the manuals we have overview pages with links per language and format on <https://www.debian.org/doc/>. See <https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals> and <https://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals> Closing this bug Holger -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3--- End Message ---
Bug#1067735: marked as done (www.debian.org: Please update links for PowerPC CHRP port)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Mar 2024 23:15:25 + with message-id <6604a88d57082_20a82994c...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1067735 fixed in www.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1067735, regarding www.debian.org: Please update links for PowerPC CHRP port to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067735: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067735 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Usertags: powerpc X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Hello, the following page for the PowerPC CHRP has some dead links: > https://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/inst/chrp These links can be updated to point to archive.debian.org: linux.bin: http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-powerpc/current/chrp/linux.bin rescue.bin: http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-powerpc/current/chrp/images-1.44/rescue.bin driver-1.bin: http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-powerpc/current/chrp/images-1.44/driver-1.bin driver-2.bin: http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-powerpc/current/chrp/images-1.44/driver-2.bin basedebs.tar: http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-powerpc/base-images-current/basedebs.tar CHRP System from Geert Uytterhoeven: https://web.archive.org/web/20140625035302/http://users.telenet.be/geertu/Linux/PPC/ In the long term, it might be a good idea to move the documentation for old architectures to Debian Ports. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, Bug #1067735 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/f391be2a6da404506bf37d828beadc81a156c1d9 ports/powerpc/inst/chrp.wml: Replace old URL with archive.d.o and web.archive.org. (Closes: #1067735) (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1067735--- End Message ---
Bug#1067671: marked as done (unable to run "make pot" due to missing english/template/debian/legal.wml)
Your message dated Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:40:40 +0100 with message-id <20240325214040.9bb924ae774c60a29e160...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1067671: unable to run "make pot" due to missing english/template/debian/legal.wml has caused the Debian Bug report #1067671, regarding unable to run "make pot" due to missing english/template/debian/legal.wml to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067671: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067671 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Hi, I noticed some .pot files are out of date when translating the web pages, but can't update them by running "make pot" under english/po. The errors are: ../../english/po/wmlxgettext.pl legal ../../english/template/debian/legal.wml ../../english/template/debian/legal_tags.wml > ../../english/po/legal.pot Unable to open ../../english/template/debian/legal.wml make[1]: *** [Makefile:140: ../../english/po/legal.pot] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/lwb/sources/webwml/english/po' make: *** [Makefile:184: pot] Error 2 This file was deleted in commit 4e6f84e3b617a3ef6f7fb3c7b7d4e75ef302968c. Thanks, Wenbin Lv --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, Wenbin Lv wrote (Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:21:16 +0800): > Package: www.debian.org > > Hi, > > I noticed some .pot files are out of date when translating the web pages, > but can't update them by running "make pot" under english/po. The errors > are: > > ../../english/po/wmlxgettext.pl legal > ../../english/template/debian/legal.wml > ../../english/template/debian/legal_tags.wml > ../../english/po/legal.pot > Unable to open ../../english/template/debian/legal.wml > make[1]: *** [Makefile:140: ../../english/po/legal.pot] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/lwb/sources/webwml/english/po' > make: *** [Makefile:184: pot] Error 2 > > This file was deleted in commit 4e6f84e3b617a3ef6f7fb3c7b7d4e75ef302968c. I seems it has been forgotten to remove the reference for legal.pot from ./english/po/Makefile. Doing that, lead to similar errors for other files, that have also been removed shortly: ./english/security/dsa.rdf.in ./english/security/make-ref-table.pl ./english/security/index.include Fixed in https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/a4735ef7b64ae00322ecd0796aa7513d9909 Closing this bug Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---
Bug#1066899: marked as done (wiki.debian.org: Missing definition (link) about "git-dpm project")
Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:48:26 -0400 with message-id <8f057b22b8cb8b480159560b78f3bea1593efb26.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1066899: wiki.debian.org: Missing definition (link) about "git-dpm project" has caused the Debian Bug report #1066899, regarding wiki.debian.org: Missing definition (link) about "git-dpm project" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066899 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, This report is about <https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit/GitDpm/Initialize> Its first paragraph tells me about "git-dpm project". Problem description: The term is not defined or explained on the whole page. The page also miss a link to a definition of that term. Suggested solution: Use a hyperlink on the string "git-dpm project" to point the correct definition page in the debian wiki. Thanks in advance Christian Buhtz --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 07:07:47 + wrote: > Thanks for reaching out. > > On 2024-03-19 10:41 Boyuan Yang wrote: > > I don't think there is such a definition. > > That is the problem. > > > According to my > > understanding, the "git-dpm project" solely means ... > > [..] > > Please feel free to rephrase it, edit the Wiki page as > > needed > > No I don't "feel free" because I am not the expert. > > Please do it on your site or find an expert how has the expertise to > explain that term. > > In the current state that wiki page harm the project more then it helps. As you requested, I made modification to rephrase the sentence and add the explanation. Closing this bug report accordingly. Thanks, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message ---
Bug#1066916: marked as done (wiki.debian.org: Remove ""PackagingWithGit/GitDpm/ImportDsc" because it is merged into ""PackagingWithGit/GitDpm")
Your message dated Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:37:19 -0400 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1066916: wiki.debian.org: Remove ""PackagingWithGit/GitDpm/ImportDsc" because it is merged into ""PackagingWithGit/GitDpm" has caused the Debian Bug report #1066916, regarding wiki.debian.org: Remove ""PackagingWithGit/GitDpm/ImportDsc" because it is merged into ""PackagingWithGit/GitDpm" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066916: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066916 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I don't see how to remove wiki pages. Please remove "PackagingWithGit/GitDpm/ImportDsc" because it's content now is integrated into "PackagingWithGit/GitDpm". There was to less content on that page to reason it existence. Kind Christian Buhtz --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- 在 2024-03-15星期五的 11:57 +，Christian Buhtz写道： > Package: wiki.debian.org > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I don't see how to remove wiki pages. > > Please remove "PackagingWithGit/GitDpm/ImportDsc" because it's content now is > integrated into "PackagingWithGit/GitDpm". There was to less content on that > page to reason it existence. Deleted as requested. Note that you can also do it by yourself (be careful through!). The deletion operation is available in the "More operations..." dropdown menu. Thanks, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message ---
Bug#1067029: marked as done (www.debian.org: Landing page missing donation information)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 18:38:26 +0100 with message-id <26103.10898.359062.945...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #1067029, regarding www.debian.org: Landing page missing donation information to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067029: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067029 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, I realized that the landing page <https://www.debian.org> do miss information (or link) about how to donate to Debian. Might be <https://www.debian.org/donations.en.html> Kind Christian --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, I you click on one of the two "more" buttons on the landing page, you will see the donations link. Also just search in any search engine for "debian donate" There's no need to add a link to this on the landing page/startpage. regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#1061651: marked as done (wiki.debian.org/eSCL ScannerShare.com domain is for sale)
Your message dated Sun, 28 Jan 2024 01:20:34 -0500 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1061651: wiki.debian.org/eSCL ScannerShare.com domain is for sale has caused the Debian Bug report #1061651, regarding wiki.debian.org/eSCL ScannerShare.com domain is for sale to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1061651: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061651 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hello everyone at the end of https://wiki.debian.org/eSCL article there is a link to a domain which is for sale so not available anymore. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 8:45 PM Luc wrote: > > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: normal > > > Hello everyone at the end of https://wiki.debian.org/eSCL article there is a > link to a domain which is for sale so not available anymore. Thanks for the info. I have removed the defunct link from the Wiki page. Regards, Boyuan Yang--- End Message ---
Bug#1061354: marked as done (packages.debian.org: MIT mirror returns 503 error)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:24:55 -0700 with message-id <0ea52cdb-59dd-4fb6-ac9c-1122588b0...@thelittleman.net> and subject line Re: Bug#1061354: Acknowledgement (packages.debian.org: MIT mirror returns 503 error) has caused the Debian Bug report #1061354, regarding packages.debian.org: MIT mirror returns 503 error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1061354: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061354 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: important Dear Maintainer, packages.debian.org appears to likely have two physical hosts, one at MIT, and one hosted via conova(?): = packages.debian.org has address 128.31.0.51 packages.debian.org has address 195.192.210.132 packages.debian.org has IPv6 address 2603:400a::bb8::801f:33 packages.debian.org has IPv6 address 2a02:16a8:dc41:100::132 NetRange: 128.31.0.0 - 128.31.255.255 CIDR: 128.31.0.0/16 NetName:MIT-RES NetRange: 2603:4000:: - 2603:40FF:::::: CIDR: 2603:4000::/24 NetName:MIT-V6 inetnum:195.192.208.0 - 195.192.215.255 netname:AT-CONOVA-19960403 inet6num: 2a02:16a8:dc41:100::/56 netname:CUS-DEBIAN ... route6: 2a02:16a8::/32 descr: conova communications GmbH IPv6 Route Object = While the two conova-associated IPs seem to work fine, the MIT-associated hosts hang for 60 seconds before eventually returning a 503: = $ time curl -I --resolve packages.debian.org:443:128.31.0.51 "https://packages.debian.org/sid/p7zip"; HTTP/2 503 ... real1m4.353s $ time curl -I --resolve packages.debian.org:443:[2a02:16a8:dc41:100::132] "https://packages.debian.org/sid/p7zip"; HTTP/2 200 ... real0m0.519s $ time curl -I --resolve packages.debian.org:443:[2603:400a::bb8::801f:33] "https://packages.debian.org/sid/p7zip"; HTTP/2 503 ... real1m4.350s $ time curl -I --resolve packages.debian.org:443:195.192.210.132 "https://packages.debian.org/sid/p7zip"; HTTP/2 200 ... real0m0.523s This also results in a web browser failing to load the page ~50% of the time (across launches). I have confirmed this behavior from multiple ISPs, web browsers, and curl. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- I'm not sure what happened, but it appears the issue has been resolved. All four IPs now promptly return 200 success codes. Thanks!--- End Message ---
Bug#859123: marked as done (automate import of DLAs and DSAs in www.debian.org)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2023 19:13:24 +0100
with message-id <25995.6084.847269.549...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #859123,
regarding automate import of DLAs and DSAs in www.debian.org
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
859123: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859123
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
According to carnil in a discussion on the debian-lts@ mailing list,
DLAs and DSAs are manually imported in the website:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2017/03/msg00200.html
The process looks something like:
cd webwml/english/security
./parse-dla.pl $message
cvs add $year/dla-$nr.{wml,data}
cvs commit -m '[DLA $nr] $source security update'
where $message is the text of the DLA.
A similar script exists for DSAs, which is in parse-advisory.pl.
My question is: should this process be automated further? Is there a
way we could/should do this within the security team(s) directly?
I ask this because I wonder if we would have had the same problem with
the missing DLAs (in #859122) if the process would be automated.
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armhf
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I have removed the old security and lts/security
web pages which need manual editing a page for every new security
advisory.
All DSA and DLA are now automatically added to the web pages.
Therefore we can close this bug.
--
regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#354432: marked as done (www.debian.org: [debian-i18n] Incorrect Quote in paragraphs with different language)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2023 22:10:01 +0100 with message-id <25988.43433.131983.698...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #354432, regarding www.debian.org: [debian-i18n] Incorrect Quote in paragraphs with different language to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 354432: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354432 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: l10n If you look at http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001.de.html for example in section "1: Was ist die GFDL?". The quote is in english (starting with "The purpose of this License") but the german quote signs are used. I don't know if CSS is capable of handling the language switch within one document. Please tag "wontfix" if this is not the case. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.deb-7-grsec Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. helge.kreutzm...@itp.uni-hannover.de gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Closing this bug because it's stale for years and noone tested the new bug for years. -- --- End Message ---
Bug#1037324: marked as done (d.o/CD/live refers to images no longer built)
Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2023 21:49:43 +0100 with message-id <6c3f7054-38be-4d06-835d-64c939a13...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: #1037324d.o/CD/live refers to images no longer built has caused the Debian Bug report #1037324, regarding d.o/CD/live refers to images no longer built to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1037324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037324 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org, j...@debian.org i386 live images are no longer built as of bookworm, but the download page still refers to them. It needs a bit of a rewrite because the only architecture now is amd64. I became aware because of direct user reports. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Has been dealed with in the meantime, so closing. -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3--- End Message ---
Processed: some bug triaging
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # to avoid these *.debian.org bugs showing up against the release > # lets tag them as sid only (although technically that's not totally > # correct either) > tags 823236 sid Bug #823236 [sso.debian.org] login error Bug #823274 [sso.debian.org] login error Added tag(s) sid. Added tag(s) sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 823236: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823236 823274: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823274 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: some bug triaging
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # to avoid these *.debian.org bugs showing up against the release > # lets tag them as sid only (although technically that's not totally > # correct either) > tags 388141 = sid Bug #388141 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org SPI copyright claim not legally valid until all contributors are contacted for relicensing Removed tag(s) jessie, bullseye, bookworm, buster-ignore, stretch, trixie, and buster. > tags 548024 sid Bug #548024 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: mirror doesn't close old databases Added tag(s) sid. > tags 1037324 sid Bug #1037324 [www.debian.org] d.o/CD/live refers to images no longer built Added tag(s) sid. > tags 1055043 sid Bug #1055043 [qa.debian.org] Debian carnivore: port from Python 2 to 3 Added tag(s) sid. > tags 1051661 sid Bug #1051661 [ftp.debian.org] /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc: Package not installable Added tag(s) sid. > tags 939147 sid Bug #939147 [ftp.debian.org] gcc-7-source 7.4.0-11 vanished from the archive Added tag(s) sid. > tags 1023811 sid Bug #1023811 [ftp.debian.org] golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware_1.3.0-1 sources changed in the archive? Added tag(s) sid. > # apparently "sarge" isn't enough to not have it affect testing > tags 497471 sid Bug #497471 [cdimage.debian.org] sarge images have syslinux binaries without source Added tag(s) sid. > tags 507706 sid etch Bug #507706 [cdimage.debian.org] Missing sources for d-i components/kernel of etch-n-half images Added tag(s) etch and sid. > # let's connect this > affects 1025650 src:nmap Bug #1025650 [ftp.debian.org] ftp.debian.org: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Added indication that 1025650 affects src:nmap > # might be better to add some words > reassign 993274 release-notes Bug #993274 [upgrade-reports] machine unbootable after upgrade Bug reassigned from package 'upgrade-reports' to 'release-notes'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #993274 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #993274 to the same values previously set > # seems like a (hopefully old) grub bug > reassign 1006369 src:grub2 2.06-3~deb10u1 Bug #1006369 [upgrade-reports] mini-NAS v1 currently not system-upgradable to Buster Bug reassigned from package 'upgrade-reports' to 'src:grub2'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1006369 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1006369 to the same values previously set Bug #1006369 [src:grub2] mini-NAS v1 currently not system-upgradable to Buster Marked as found in versions grub2/2.06-3~deb10u1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1006369: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006369 1023811: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023811 1025650: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025650 1037324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037324 1051661: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051661 1055043: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055043 388141: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388141 497471: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497471 507706: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507706 548024: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548024 939147: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939147 993274: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993274 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1057284: marked as done (migrate get-www-stats to python3)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Dec 2023 20:31:22 + with message-id <656b941a280ac_52394c...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1057284 fixed in www.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1057284, regarding migrate get-www-stats to python3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1057284: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057284 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org The script get-www-stats is using python2. It does not work with python3 because it uses counts.iteritems which must be migrated. The script should also ignore log entries with produces 403 on the web server. Currently this is half of them because of a lot of access to the uncompressed oval...xml files. We only have this python2 script in the webwml repo. Python scripts in security/oval are already python3. regards Thomas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, Bug #1057284 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/cb75e2efed8aa70cd922b767cf7bcc28db4db989 move to python3, Closes: #1057284 (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1057284--- End Message ---
Bug#941962: marked as done (Publish the new (Sphinx based) Developers Reference in)
Your message dated Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:13:35 +0100 with message-id <94e1b18b-e31b-463f-a240-5aca23d35...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: #941962Publish the new (Sphinx based) Developers Reference has caused the Debian Bug report #941962, regarding Publish the new (Sphinx based) Developers Reference in to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 941962: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941962 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:developers-reference Version: 3.4.25 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Patch is provided as rest8 branch. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/developers-reference/tree/rest8 ├── debian │ ├── changelog │ ├── control │ ├── copyright │ ├── developers-reference-de.doc-base │ ├── developers-reference-de.docs │ ├── developers-reference.doc-base │ ├── developers-reference.docs │ ├── developers-reference-fr.doc-base │ ├── developers-reference-fr.docs │ ├── developers-reference-it.doc-base │ ├── developers-reference-it.docs │ ├── developers-reference-ja.doc-base │ ├── developers-reference-ja.docs │ ├── developers-reference-ru.doc-base │ ├── developers-reference-ru.docs │ ├── rules │ ├── source │ │ └── format │ ├── tocsubstvars │ └── TODO ├── Makefile ├── README.contributing ├── source │ ├── best-pkging-practices.rst │ ├── beyond-pkging.rst │ ├── conf.py │ ├── developer-duties.rst │ ├── index.rst │ ├── l10n.rst │ ├── locales │ │ ├── de │ │ │ └── LC_MESSAGES │ │ │ ├── best-pkging-practices.po │ │ │ ├── beyond-pkging.po │ │ │ ├── developer-duties.po │ │ │ ├── index.po │ │ │ ├── l10n.po │ │ │ ├── new-maintainer.po │ │ │ ├── pkgs.po │ │ │ ├── resources.po │ │ │ ├── scope.po │ │ │ └── tools.po │ │ ├── fr │ │ │ └── LC_MESSAGES │ │ │ ├── best-pkging-practices.po │ │ │ ├── beyond-pkging.po │ │ │ ├── developer-duties.po │ │ │ ├── index.po │ │ │ ├── l10n.po │ │ │ ├── new-maintainer.po │ │ │ ├── pkgs.po │ │ │ ├── resources.po │ │ │ ├── scope.po │ │ │ └── tools.po │ │ ├── it │ │ │ └── LC_MESSAGES │ │ │ ├── best-pkging-practices.po │ │ │ ├── beyond-pkging.po │ │ │ ├── developer-duties.po │ │ │ ├── index.po │ │ │ ├── l10n.po │ │ │ ├── new-maintainer.po │ │ │ ├── pkgs.po │ │ │ ├── resources.po │ │ │ ├── scope.po │ │ │ └── tools.po │ │ ├── ja │ │ │ └── LC_MESSAGES │ │ │ ├── best-pkging-practices.po │ │ │ ├── beyond-pkging.po │ │ │ ├── developer-duties.po │ │ │ ├── index.po │ │ │ ├── l10n.po │ │ │ ├── new-maintainer.po │ │ │ ├── pkgs.po │ │ │ ├── resources.po │ │ │ ├── scope.po │ │ │ └── tools.po │ │ └── ru │ │ └── LC_MESSAGES │ │ ├── best-pkging-practices.po │ │ ├── beyond-pkging.po │ │ ├── developer-duties.po │ │ ├── index.po │ │ ├── l10n.po │ │ ├── new-maintainer.po │ │ ├── pkgs.po │ │ ├── resources.po │ │ ├── scope.po │ │ └── tools.po │ ├── new-maintainer.rst │ ├── pkgs.rst │ ├── resources.rst │ ├── scope.rst │ ├── _static │ └── tools.rst └── sphinx-multi You can build HTML and PDF with "make". debian/* still needs to be polished as of this posting. The conversion process is completely recorded in the history. If main branch is update, we can rebase most of rest8 and do the operation as in the commit message to get conversion for the updated master if needed. Maybe, now I think Sphinx expert can take over to get proper packaging. Osamu -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Holger Wansing wrote: > I guess this bug can be closed, right? So closing. Holger -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3--- End Message ---
Bug#1001738: marked as done (404 on www.debian.org/releases/testing/*/release-notes/)
Your message dated Fri, 24 Nov 2023 21:49:44 +0100 with message-id <3c27d1c5-bc88-4ce9-844d-4cee671fd...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: 404 on www.debian.org/releases/testing/*/release-notes/ has caused the Debian Bug report #1001738, regarding 404 on www.debian.org/releases/testing/*/release-notes/ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1001738: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001738 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Version: current The release notes for all architectural variants of the 'testing' release are inaccessible. Attempting to access the corresponding URLs produces 404 (Page not found) errors. For instance, the URL for the amd64 release notes ( https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/release-notes/), which can be accessed by clicking the hyperlinked text "Release Notes for 64-bit PC (amd64)" at this URL (https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes) produces the following error: "Page not found We are sorry, the page you were looking for can't be found on this site. Please inform the site owner that referred you to this page about the broken link. You can go to the home page of the Debian project in the meantime or use the search engine to crawl the website for the information you are looking for. Back to the Debian Project homepage." Best regards. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This was most likely a temporary situation: after a release, there are often no release-notes for the *next* release available. They appear, when time comes... Moreover, things have changed recently with release-notes: we do no longer create separate release-notes variants for the different archs. So the paths have changed anyway. All in all, I'm closing this bug. Thanks for reporting anyway Holger -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3--- End Message ---
Bug#709004: marked as done (www.debian.org: Please mention win32-loader on "Getting Debian" webpage)
Your message dated Fri, 24 Nov 2023 21:10:40 +0100 with message-id <7aabab89-16d7-42f6-9d74-02d701751...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: www.debian.org: Please mention win32-loader on "Getting Debian" webpage has caused the Debian Bug report #709004, regarding www.debian.org: Please mention win32-loader on "Getting Debian" webpage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 709004: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709004 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hey guys, I have just installed Wheezy on my old Thinkpad, and it went perfectly fine! Thanks for that! In preparation for that installation, it came to my mind, that I could try installing via win32-loader, since I had Windows XP running on that machine. So I downloaded it from the web and the installation worked perfectly, as said above. But I noticed, that this way of installing Debian is not mentioned on the "Getting Debian" page or on http://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/debian-installer/. Wouldn't this be good, to mention as another way of installing Debian? I could prepare a patch, if desired. Cheers Holger -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- win32-loader has been removed from the archive, so closing this bug. -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3--- End Message ---
Bug#983831: marked as done (Dead link at https://www.debian.org/consultants/)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:27:41 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Dead link at https://www.debian.org/consultants/ has caused the Debian Bug report #983831, regarding Dead link at https://www.debian.org/consultants/ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 983831: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983831 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Name: www.callpaul.eu URL: www.callpaul.eu Location: Line 1733, Col 23 Scott s...@linux.com [scm.guru](http://scm.guru/) Freenode: scm OFTC: scm--- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, I am closing this old bug report since the link works. (The original submitter email does not exists anymore, so I cannot ask him to close it.) Bye, Giuseppe--- End Message ---
Bug#983833: marked as done (Dead link at https://www.debian.org/consultants/)
Your message dated Sat, 18 Nov 2023 02:06:24 +0100 with message-id and subject line working link has caused the Debian Bug report #983833, regarding Dead link at https://www.debian.org/consultants/ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 983833: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983833 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Name: fb.me/samsul.web.id URL: fb.me/samsul.web.id Location: Line 2631, Col 27 Scott s...@linux.com [scm.guru](http://scm.guru/) Freenode: scm OFTC: scm--- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- That is, at this time, a working link.--- End Message ---
Bug#1053445: marked as done (Merge request regarding 'Please migrate Release Notes to reStructuredText')
Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2023 21:08:00 +0100 with message-id <20231110210800.0e049df98ae1c8df347bd...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1053445: Merge request regarding 'Please migrate Release Notes to reStructuredText' has caused the Debian Bug report #1053445, regarding Merge request regarding 'Please migrate Release Notes to reStructuredText' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1053445: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053445 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal [Re-send attempt 3; simply mentioning a bug number in the subject apparently leads to the mail being sent to that bug; and therefore you have a mail, which tries to create a new bug, while replying to an exiting one; and this seems to be rejected by the BTS] Paul Gevers wrote (Thu, 24 Aug 2023 14:10:41 +0200): > Hi Holger, > > On 29-07-2023 21:29, Holger Wansing wrote: > > I have worked out the last big blocker for this migration now. > > That is, to allow the build on wolkenstein, which is happening via the > > parts/7release-notes script in webmaster-team/cron git repo. > > I have just requested webmaster to switch the bookworm build from the > master branch to the bookworm branch [1]. After that request gets merged > and deployed, I'd like you to publish your work in the master branch > such that we can work from there (and see the results too [2]). Because > in your worked we stopped making notes per architecture, we probably > need to make further changes to the webmaster archive, but let's first > build something. Hey webmaster team, please consider MR13 in webmaster's cron repo: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/merge_requests/13 Thanks Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- > > On 29-07-2023 21:29, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hey webmaster team, > > please consider MR13 in webmaster's cron repo: > > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/-/merge_requests/13 This has been done; closing this bug. -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076--- End Message ---
Bug#845601: marked as done (packages.debian.org: add form to search code of source packages)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:34:08 +0200 with message-id <25908.35360.525876.37...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #845601, regarding packages.debian.org: add form to search code of source packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 845601: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845601 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: www.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: packages It would be nice to have a form to search code of source packages on source package pages. There are examples of how to do this on the PTS and package tracker pages: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux.html -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- We have https://sources.debian.org/ for searching the source code. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#742550: marked as done (packages.debian.org: include a warning on packages from contrib/non-free)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:30:44 +0200 with message-id <25908.35156.587659.831...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #742550, regarding packages.debian.org: include a warning on packages from contrib/non-free to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 742550: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742550 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: www.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: packages.debian.org Please include some warnings on pages about packages from contrib and non-free in addition to the existing policy links. I suggest using the same model as the warnings on packages from the experimental suite. non-free package Warning: This package is from the non-free component. That means it is not free software according to Debian Free Software Guidelines. Please be sure to consult the copyright information and other possible documentation to find out why it is non-free before using it. contrib package Warning: This package is from the contrib component. That means it requires software that is not free software according to Debian Free Software Guidelines to build or run. Please be sure to consult the copyright information and other possible documentation to find out why it requires non-free software before using it. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- No, please do not play the FUD game (Fear, uncertainty and doubt). If our users need or want software from contrib or non-free they should use it without any negative comment from our side. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#472809: marked as done (packages.debian.org: access buildinfo.gz files)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:23:32 +0200 with message-id <25908.34724.475443.374...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #472809, regarding packages.debian.org: access buildinfo.gz files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 472809: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=472809 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hello, while trying to debug obscure things, I had to often check up the dh_buildinfo generated buildinfo.gz file for the architecture of the bug submitter. To do so, I had to go through a few steps like fetching the .deb from packages.debian.org and diving into it to get the buildinfo.gz. It would be useful to be able to download just the buildinfo.gz file of a package for any architecture where the package has been built. Well, ideally it would be useful to download any specific file from a package, and then buildinfo.gz could just be a link into the 'any file' download system, but that is a bit beyond of what I need. Although, a CGI that can extract just a file from a deb and pipe it out, would be a nice variation on the normal NM T&S exercises :) Ciao, Enrico -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- You can access the build logs by going to tracker.debian.org, then clicking on build logs and there click on the status column. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#461672: marked as done (packages.debian.org: search wnpp, mentors)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:26:00 +0200 with message-id <25908.34872.658380.517...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #461672, regarding packages.debian.org: search wnpp, mentors to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 461672: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461672 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist I would like it if packages.debian.org also searched wnpp, mentors and perhaps ubuntu/nexenta/etc when no results are returned (or very few exact results are returned). This is useful when trying to determine if a piece of software is in Debian as if it is not, then you want to know if someone is working on it or has been (wnpp active & archived), or if there are packages available elsewhere (mentors, ubuntu/nexenta/etc). -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Closing a bug which is inactive for 15+ years and noone else seems to need this. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#391359: marked as done (packages.debian.org: package view could have a link to the upstream changelog)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:16:23 +0200 with message-id <25908.34295.617555.351...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #391359, regarding packages.debian.org: package view could have a link to the upstream changelog to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 391359: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=391359 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: general Severity: wishlist With aptitude changelog is quite easy to know the latest modifications of a package, but it quite often refers to new upstream release. In order to see the upstream release changes I have to either download the source code or install the package and go to /usr/share/doc/. I wish I could see the source changelog from the packages.debian.org package page. Thank you. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-ck1-p4s Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- There's a link to the changelog on tracker.debian.org -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#268658: marked as done (packages.debian.org: Provide cheksums of package contents)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:09:30 +0200 with message-id <25908.33882.205193.353...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #268658, regarding packages.debian.org: Provide cheksums of package contents to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 268658: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=268658 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org On the individual package pages (for example <http://packages.debian.org/testing/base/procps>) there are links to show the list of files of this package for every architecture (under the download buttons). This list is rather useless - it only shows the file name and the package name for every file contained in the package. It should also provide the MD5 hash of every file. This would help for quick manual checks whether an installed binary was compromised: Boot from a CDROM- based distribution (e.g. Knoppix), run md5sum on the suspect file and compare it to the listing on the package page. For now I have to download the whole package and extract the control information to get a MD5 string that can be trusted (since /var/lib/dpkg/info/ on that machine might be manipulated too). Regards, Ingo --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- I don't think that the list is useless and there's no need to provide the MD5 hash of every file. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#303961: marked as done (Provide a signed checksum file for all the archive contents)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:09:30 +0200 with message-id <25908.33882.205193.353...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #268658, regarding Provide a signed checksum file for all the archive contents to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 268658: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=268658 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org On the individual package pages (for example <http://packages.debian.org/testing/base/procps>) there are links to show the list of files of this package for every architecture (under the download buttons). This list is rather useless - it only shows the file name and the package name for every file contained in the package. It should also provide the MD5 hash of every file. This would help for quick manual checks whether an installed binary was compromised: Boot from a CDROM- based distribution (e.g. Knoppix), run md5sum on the suspect file and compare it to the listing on the package page. For now I have to download the whole package and extract the control information to get a MD5 string that can be trusted (since /var/lib/dpkg/info/ on that machine might be manipulated too). Regards, Ingo --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- I don't think that the list is useless and there's no need to provide the MD5 hash of every file. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#407548: marked as done (packages.debian.org: Should include reverse-depends)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:13:44 +0200 with message-id <25908.34136.814517.659...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #407548, regarding packages.debian.org: Should include reverse-depends to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 407548: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=407548 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-amd64 Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Wontfix for many years. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#368157: marked as done (packages.debian.org/unstable: clarify if non-free etc. is included)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:14:22 +0200 with message-id <25908.34174.323437.313...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #368157, regarding packages.debian.org/unstable: clarify if non-free etc. is included to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 368157: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368157 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Just browsing http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ , one can't tell if non-free etc. are included. There should be some words to that effect added. Same even at the bottom with: All packages (compact compressed textlist) Wait, I see some [non-free] in there... --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- wontfix for so many years. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#777306: marked as done (packages.debian.org: add upstream donation links)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:12:38 +0200 with message-id <25908.34070.442770.246...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #777306, regarding packages.debian.org: add upstream donation links to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 777306: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777306 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: www.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: packages A number of Debian packages provide metadata related to how people can donate to upstream. It might be interesting to expose that in the packages website in the External Resources section after Homepage. https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=path:debian/upstream+Donation -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- No, I don't think it's interesting to show this information. Don't let us overload packages.debian.org with such information. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#450841: marked as done (packages.debian.org: old packages should show current maintainer)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:08:54 +0200 with message-id <25908.33846.58991.517...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #450841, regarding packages.debian.org: old packages should show current maintainer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 450841: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=450841 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://packages.debian.org/oldstable/ion3 shows the maintainers of ion3 as listed in the package in oldstable. While this is consistent, it is not really useful information. The current maintainer should be shown, as on packages.qa.debian.org. Ben. - -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHNyST79ZNCRIGYgcRAmiUAJ9R8clVjEiNI4S5MGnSjce8yVia3wCdG65D QLULBtGKQh7Ygf+bi9UdNhU= =KAuX -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Wontfix for 10+ years. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#207095: marked as done (packages.debian.org: should give date of last update)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:03:40 +0200 with message-id <25908.33532.652250.16...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #207095, regarding packages.debian.org: should give date of last update to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 207095: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=207095 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-25 Severity: wishlist Gentlemen, consider users looking for info on say lynx. http://packages.debian.org/lynx leads to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/lynx.html leads to "Download Page for lynx_2.8.4.1b-5_i386.deb on Intel x86 machines" leads to http://debian.linux.org.tw/debian/pool/main/l/lynx/lynx_2.8.4.1b-5_i386.deb But nowhere does the user see one speck of date information for this package, even down to the final click for a .deb. http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages2.pl?keywords=lynx&searchon=names&version=all&release=all (i.e. http://packages.debian.org/lynx) tells us byte size to the tenth of a kilobyte, etc. but totally doesn't give any "freshness dating" information. Sure, there, yes, are ways for the user to find date information, but you could consider pro-actively providing it. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- You can go to https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/lynx and see the dates when packages were uploaded. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#809796: marked as done (make dates of packages more visible)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:03:40 +0200 with message-id <25908.33532.652250.16...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #207095, regarding make dates of packages more visible to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 207095: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=207095 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Starting from https://packages.debian.org/sid/utils/ideviceinstaller it is an extreme challenge to learn any of the DATES of any of the items listed, without being forced to download to find out. One can read all of the details, except one cannot tell if the things mentioned have been updated 1 or 10 years ago. Yes, packages have no official Date: field, but one still wants some general idea how long the thing has been sitting there. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- You can go to https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/lynx and see the dates when packages were uploaded. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#176407: marked as done (packages.debian.org: search_contents: should accept regexps)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:59:06 +0200 with message-id <25908.33258.453118.972...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #176407, regarding packages.debian.org: search_contents: should accept regexps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 176407: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=176407 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-12 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Currently there is now way to find out which package contains for example the af command. When I search for af as subword, I get 300 pages of results: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=searchfiles&case=insensitive&version=unstable&arch=i386&word=af Searching for af$ would have solved the problem. Searching for full regexps in package names search would be nice too. I've recetly wished to le able to search for libpng.*-dev The and / or logic would be not to bad, if it worked. I've unsuccessfully tried: libpng and dev libpng* and *dev http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=libpng+and+dev&searchon=names&subword=1&version=unstable&release=all http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=libpng*+and+*dev&searchon=names&version=unstable&release=all - -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux tarnica 2.4.18 #4 Sat Dec 28 05:46:45 CET 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+IWbEef2MJBeMWJ0RAsL6AJ94z4LJzuvY7oFjFNUARh16ZkDpaACeKczg fLbbhEQkRrmkdR6bHM8eGFw= =Ry2S -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- A possible solution was presented. No answer for several years. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#129847: marked as done (www.debian.org: no way to get info about gone packages)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:55:39 +0200 with message-id <25908.33051.928143.725...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #129847, regarding www.debian.org: no way to get info about gone packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 129847: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=129847 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Version: 20020118 Severity: normal When a package is removed from Debian, that doesn't mean it's out of the question that anybody would like to view its Debian-specific information. In fact, getting a note that a package has been removed is +way+ more user friendly than simply getting "package not found". As long as there are bug reports, possibly remaining dependencies, or some other Debian-specifi knowledge about a package around, the package script (http://packages.debian.org/) should IMHO return pointers to whatever there is, even though the package may no longer be available for downloading. A recent example is xv, which is pretty much a de facto standard for looking at pictures under X, at least in some circles. It is confusing and distracting to find that there is no info whatsoever about this package. I can come up with at least the following scenarios where it makes better sense to provide +some+ sort of data about the package in question: 1. You imagine the package must exist, because it's pretty standard on the systems you've used before you switched to Debian, and so you assume that (for a change) Debian simply provides it under some weird name instead of the one that you expect. Big search, much time wasted, no result. 2. You have the package installed, and you want to know why it was removed. Perhaps there's a serious security flaw you should know about? Yikes. Panic. Friction. 3. You have the package installed, and want to follow up on a bug report you sent some time ago. The result page could perhaps point to an alternative which provides roughly the same functionality, but that's wishlist country already. Thank you for considering this request, /* era */ -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux there 2.2.17 #1 Sun Jun 25 09:24:41 EST 2000 i586 unknown --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Closing since it's tagged wontfix for 20+ years. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#422074: marked as done (packages.debian.org's changelogs for bin NMUs are broken)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:50:32 +0200 with message-id <25908.32744.122397.973...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #422074, regarding packages.debian.org's changelogs for bin NMUs are broken to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 422074: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422074 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gnome-netstatus-applet Version: 2.12.0-5+b2 Severity: minor suplin@fujitsu:~$ aptitude changelog gnome-netstatus-applet Ign ChangeLog of gnome-netstatus-applet E: Couldn't fetch URL http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/g/gnome-netstatus/gnome-netstatus_2.12.0-5+b2/changelog E: Couldn't find a changelog for gnome-netstatus-applet -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-amd64 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnome-netstatus-applet depends on: ii gconf22.16.1-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii gksu 2.0.0-1graphical frontend to su ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.12.4-3 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libavahi-client3 0.6.16-3etch1 Avahi client library ii libavahi-common3 0.6.16-3etch1 Avahi common library ii libavahi-glib10.6.16-3etch1 Avahi glib integration library ii libbonobo2-0 2.14.0-3 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.14.0-5 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.2.4-4The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libdbus-1-3 1.0.2-1simple interprocess messaging syst ii libesd0 0.2.36-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfontconfig12.4.2-1.2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-5FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgconf2-4 2.16.1-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.3-2LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.0-4 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring0 0.6.0-3GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome2-0 2.16.0-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.14.0-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.14.1-2+b1The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-01:2.14.2-7 GNOME virtual file-system (runtime ii libgnutls13 1.4.4-3the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libgpg-error0 1.4-1 library for common error values an ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.20-7 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-13 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii liborbit2 1:2.14.3-0.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpanel-applet2-02.14.3-5 library for GNOME 2 panel applets ii libpango1.0-0 1.14.8-5 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.15~beta5-1 PNG library - runtime ii libpopt0 1.10-3 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm61:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library ii libtasn1-30.3.6-2Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-7 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor1 1.1.7-4X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxfixes31:4.0.1-5 X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio ii libxi61:1.0.1-4 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4.1X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml2 2.6.27.dfsg-1 GNOME XML library ii libxrandr22:1.1.0.2-5X11 RandR extension lib
Bug#596558: marked as done (automate processing of http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:47:22 +0200 with message-id <25908.32554.742541.369...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #596558, regarding automate processing of http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 596558: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596558 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Richard suggested a while ago automating checks around vendors : - at submission time - after submission On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 06:19:44PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote: > Yes, we received your information (for all 3 times that you filled out the > form). Unfortunately, this is a mostly manual process and I only add > batches of new entries every few weeks. Sorry - please be patient. > > To the mailing list: > > Ideally, there should be an automated system where each vendor only submits > a single URL. A script would then crawl the vendor's pages to a certain > depth at regular intervals, and filter out pages that contain predefined > tags for the different Debian CD/DVD variants. This would also make it easy > to weed out stale entries, sites that are down etc. Unfortunately, I never > quite get around to implementing something like this. What script languages > are accepted for this type of thing on Debian servers? (I'm much more of a > PHP than Perl person...) -- Simon Paillard --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Closing because no action on this bug for 10+ years. -- Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#744857: marked as done ([www] year's index of DPN should be in general cat)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:45:21 +0200
with message-id <25908.32433.428551.484...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #744857,
regarding [www] year's index of DPN should be in general cat
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
744857: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=744857
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
year's index of DPN should be in general instead of news category on
website/stats/**
--
victory
no need to CC me :-)
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/102724 0.0.1.4
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/163846 0.0.1
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/163848 0.0.1
--- stattrans-old.pl2013-12-26 18:43:48 +0900
+++ stattrans.pl2014-04-15 23:53:45 +0900
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@
$ui_body .=$u_tmp;
} elsif ((($file =~ /(News|events|security|vote)\/[0-9]{4}\//)
&&
($file !~ /index.wml$/)) ||
-($file =~
/(News\/weekly\/[0-9]{4}\/|security\/undated)/)) {
+($file =~
/(News\/weekly\/[0-9]{4}\/(timeline|\d+)|security\/undated)/)) {
$un_body .= $u_tmp;
} elsif (($file =~ /(consultants|users\/(com|edu|gov|org))\//)
&&
($file !~ /index.wml$/)) {
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
No action since many years, and the timeline.wml is no used any more since 2005.
--
reagrds Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#364913: marked as done (www.debian.org: Vote-Pages should be build with more templates (easier translating/maintaining))
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:34:07 +0200 with message-id <25908.31759.321641.976...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #364913, regarding www.debian.org: Vote-Pages should be build with more templates (easier translating/maintaining) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 364913: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364913 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Lots of content on the vote pages is repeated over and over again. In fact, when I translate pages in the vote tree, I often use copy and paste. Since wml/the Debian weg page supports l10n properly, most of the repeated texts should be put into templates (or other wml-constructs). If you like, I can collect those repetitive texts (and their german, maybe also french) translation. Some files (e.g. for details on the voting) can be autogenerated entirely (maybe except for a few variables). This change would ease maintenance as well, as in the recent weeks at least two changes effected several voting pages. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.deb-7-grsec Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Noone work on fixing this, so closing. Feel free to reopen this bug, if soneone really works on this. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#443996: marked as done (packages.debian.org: please provide a RSS/Atom feed for package changelogs)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:30:49 +0200 with message-id <25908.31561.256691.979...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #443996, regarding packages.debian.org: please provide a RSS/Atom feed for package changelogs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 443996: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=443996 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist The new packages.debian.org really rocks, thank you! I especially like the changelog feature, which enables users to track what's going on to packages on the web. To increase this positive effect I think it would be really cool to have some kind of feed (RSS, Atom, ...) associated to each package changelog. That way users will be able to subscribe to it and avoid polling. Can you please add such a feature? Just in case I'll manage to find time to work on this by myself (but ATM it's unlikely ...), can you please comment on the following roadmap to implement this (roadmap obtained skimming really quickly on the current git codebase): - add to lib/Parse/DebianChangelog* the ability to convert changelogs to the desired feed format - to implement the above would it be ok to use some perl library which I guess already exists to generate feeds - alternatively, would it be ok to perform some XSLT transformation starting from the current XML generation? - then the feed should be generated statically on disk, where should I look for this? - we can't simply ships the RSS feeds following the current naming scheme; a feed placed under, for example, http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/v/vim/vim_7.1-056+2/ would be pretty useless. How do you think this can be solved properly? TIA, Cheers. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Since 16 years noone managed to work on this. Therefore closing. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#891240: marked as done (Clarification about debian maintainer list)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 23:28:09 +0200 with message-id <25906.61673.298015.461...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #891240, regarding Clarification about debian maintainer list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 891240: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891240 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org User: www.debian@packages.debian.org Usertag: scripts Severity: normal Hello Valerio Thanks for your mail. I'm turning this into a bug so it does not get lost. Commenting inline: El 23/02/18 a las 15:29, Valerio Pachera escribió: > https://www.debian.org/devel/index.en.html > > Debian is made collaboratively by many people spread around the world. > /Packaging work/ is usually contributed by both Debian Developers (DD) > <https://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper> (which are full members of the > Debian project) and by Debian Maintainers (DM) > <https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer>. Here you can find both the > list of Debian Developers <https://www.debian.org/devel/people> and the > list of Debian Maintainers <https://nm.debian.org/public/people/dm_all>, > together with the packages they maintain. > > 1) Debian Developers list seems to be outdated. Maybe that link should pint to https://nm.debian.org/public/people/dm_all > A friend of mine noticed it because she know that 3-D printer team is > managing more packages than the listed ones. > > 2) The Debian Maintainers list do note report any package name and that > doesn't correspond to "together with the packages they maintain" > And maybe remove that "together with the packages they maintain", and add another sentence X, pointing to www.debian.org/devel/people. X being an accurate description of... what we gather and save in /devel/people.names And what do we gather and save in people.names? our cron scripts point to https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/people_scripts/update.people.html echo "re-creating people.names file..." ./people.pl data/*/*.Packages* data/*.Sources* > people.names.new and people.pl script is here https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/people_scripts/people.pl Being the first time I see the script, I'll stop here for now, hopefully some other friend that knows the script better can explain or update or fix. If not, I'll try to put some time on this next week. Best regards -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- We can close this bug, because update.people.html and people.pl does not exist any more. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#924137: marked as done (www.debian.org: debian.org metapackage: add python python-lxml)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 23:15:37 +0200 with message-id <25906.60921.862120.306...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #924137, regarding www.debian.org: debian.org metapackage: add python python-lxml to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 924137: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924137 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal User: www.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: scripts Hi, While working on rebuilding the website within stretch and buster, I've noticed the following. The metapackage (in debian.org.git) doesn't mention either python or python-lxml, but both are needed for the english/security/oval/oval/definition/generator.py script. This should be fixed by submitting a fix to DSA, but I'm failing this against www.debian.org for the time being as part of my “sprint”. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- The package debian.org-www-master.debian.org includes python3-lxml. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#612442: marked as done (www.debian.org: limit maximum width of text)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 22:07:51 +0200
with message-id <25906.56855.426316.890...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #612442,
regarding www.debian.org: limit maximum width of text
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
612442: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Version: n/a
The new site design, rolled out with the squeeze release, is quite
wonderful. I would like to propose, however, that the maximum width of
the text would be limited, for the sake of readability, to something
like 60em. If one has a very wide browser window for other reasons, it
would be nice if the Debian site would still be easily readable.
As an example of such other reasons, I sometimes need to have a very
large image open in one tab, and then switch to a different tab for
Debian content. I could work around this by having the Debian content
open in a separate window, rather than tab, or resize the window when
changing tabs, but it'd be more convenient for me, and I suspect other
readers, to have the Debian CSS to include something like this:
body { max-width: 60em; }
(Possibly some other element than body would be a better fit.)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We have do action on this since 10+ years. And noone lese complained
about this, so closing this bug.
--
regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#722906: marked as done (Document additional methods for validating Debian-distributed files)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 22:03:37 +0200 with message-id <25906.56601.972856.636...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #818367, regarding Document additional methods for validating Debian-distributed files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 818367: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818367 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: important The Debian website provides no reasonable way of verifying downloads in absence of a solid web of trust. The checksums, keys and their fingerprints aren't served over HTTPS, with the exception of https://ftp-master.debian.org/keys.html but the chain of trust in that case is unreasonably difficult to establish for the purpose of checking CD images or other downloads. Furthermore, http://www.debian.org/CD/verify encourages insecure ways of checking fingerprints, which are posted on a plain HTTP page. There's also no mention of ftp-master and how to use the archive keys to establish a chain of trust. It would be fair to expect a large proportion of users cannot or will not be able to establish such a web of trust, especially if they're new users. No matter how bad it is, the CA system is still better than nothing and pretty much the only option for a lot of people, so for the purpose of verifying an image and bootstrapping a chain of trust it should do. I suggest hosting all CD image checksums on an official HTTPS page and updating http://www.debian.org/CD/verify accordingly. This makes it really easy to check downloads, bootstraps the chain of trust with the keys in the image and prevent minimally security-conscious users from doing an insecure verfication or skipping it altogether. Furthermore, it's *very* cheap. In addition to that, consider hosting all keys or at least their fingerprints on a HTTPS page. This can be an alternative to what I suggested above regarding checksums, but I'd advise against doing only that considering a lot of users just aren't familiar with PGP. P.S: On a side note, I recently examined that aspect for a few other major distros. Turns out Ubuntu also gets it wrong (not to mention they still opt for MD5 checksums). Fedora and Gentoo do provide verifiable keys/checksums (although in Gentoo's case official advice could be better): https://fedoraproject.org/verify https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/ --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- We provide the links to the full keys on this page. Therefore closing. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#818367: marked as done (Publish complete CD image signing keys over HTTPS)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 22:03:37 +0200 with message-id <25906.56601.972856.636...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #818367, regarding Publish complete CD image signing keys over HTTPS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 818367: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818367 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org https://www.debian.org/CD/verify currently provides fingerprints and key IDs for the image signing keys, which users can retrieve from a keyserver. However, GPG fingerprints are merely SHA1 hashes, making key verification the weakest link in the chain. The TLS certificate, image hashes and their signatures are already SHA256. SHA1 is fairly weak nowadays. Fingerprint checking is more of a stop-gap measure than best practice. That being said, I urge you to publish the full keys on that page. This ensures a trust chain at least as good as SHA256, which is very reasonable for 2016. Users should not rely on checking fingerprints for keys retrieved over insecure channels. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- We provide the links to the full keys on this page. Therefore closing. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#703050: marked as done (www.debian.org: Please document the criteria for debian.net services to be integrated into debian.org)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:57:16 +0200 with message-id <25906.56220.792123.771...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #703050, regarding www.debian.org: Please document the criteria for debian.net services to be integrated into debian.org to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 703050: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703050 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Some debian.net services would serve their purpose better if they were integrated into the www.d.o namespace, but the criteria for deciding which services would qualify is not documented. Here's some suggestions that could be a useful start: - there is consensus and/or evidence that the service is useful enough to warrant attention from d.o visitors - the developer of the service is willing to stay around to maintain the service, and/or produce sufficient documentation for its maintenance - the service's web site uses d.o's stylesheets and navigation, and meets the web team's accessibility requirements - the web team feels comfortable to support the service from a security perspective (eg. because the site is a bunch of static HTML files, or if it's dynamic, it uses a stack that's considered acceptable) - the original developer is willing to address any other concerns the web team might have cheers, sez ps. my personal motivation for this bug report is wnpp-by-tags.d.n which I think would serve its purpose better by relocating to eg. www.d.o/devel/wnpp/by_tags and linked to from www.d.o/devel/wnpp --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Since 10 years noone worked on this bug and noone else seems to need this documentation. Therefore closing. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#947706: marked as done (www.debian.org: Updating Debian ports web pages)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:48:45 +0200 with message-id <25906.55709.615627.485...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #947706, regarding www.debian.org: Updating Debian ports web pages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 947706: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947706 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: |wishlist Tags: newcomer | Dear Webmaster Team, Dear all, Some contents needs to be reviewed on the portages Debian web page [1] like as dead links or old contents/descriptions. I've already start the work by cleaning the 301 links to their new location. As help, we can use the build logs of the website section urlcheck/ports [2]. Tasks can be get by multiple people and appropriate for newcomer. For coordination please send an email to the webmaster team [3]. Also, you can join #debian-www chanel on IRC (OFTC Network) [4]. The source code of the Debian Website is availaible on Debian Salsa repository [5]. If you don't have write access to this repository, you can fork it in your own Salsa home, and create merge-request to review. Debian Salsa is based on Gitlab. If you are not familiar with Salsa, take a look on this Wiki page [6] and don't hesitate to ask for help. - Bellow the list of officials portages: - amd64 - arm64 - armel - armhf - i386 - mipsel - mips64el - ppc64el - s390x - Bellow the list of unofficials portages: - alpha - arm - AVR32 - hppa - hurd-i386 - ia64 - kfreebsd-amd64 - kfreebsd-i386 - m32r - m68k - mips - netbsd-i386 - netbsd-alpha - or1k - powerpc - powerpcspe - riscv64 - s390 - sparc - sparc64 - sh4 - x32 - Bests regards, Alban [1] https://www.debian.org/ports/ [2] https://www-master.debian.org/build-logs/urlcheck/ports/ [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/ [4] https://wiki.debian.org/IRC [5] https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml [6] https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Two MR are already merged. https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/merge_requests/322 was not rebased in the past two years. Therefore closing. The MR #322 will still be open, so we can track the issue there. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Bug#679956: marked as done (please document the debian.net namespace and its entries)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:18:13 +0200 with message-id <25906.53877.918922.960...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #679956, regarding please document the debian.net namespace and its entries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 679956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679956 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist [ full quote of the -project post at https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/06/msg00159.html for the bug report records ] On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:22:00AM +0100, Stuart Prescott wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > - I've already discussed in a related thread of a few months ago how I > > think the current distinction between debian.net and debian.org should > > be documented, incidentally resolving other visibility problems of > > those services. Not that the dnsZoneEntry LDAP entry is publicly > > available, we should have an automated generated index of debian.net > > services, with pointers to the responsible DD. I think it'd be a good > > idea to have such index live at http://www.debian.net together with an > > explanation of the debian.net/.org distinction. I don't think *this > > part* of the confusion is enough to justify changes of the current > > scheme (but see below for another possible reason). > > > > Stuart Prescott (Cc:-ed) has already drafted an implementation of the > > index generation and I've encouraged him to submit it as a wishlist > > bug report + patch to the -www team a few weeks ago. Stuart: any news > > on that front? (I can't check if the bug report is on right now due to > > shaky mobile phone connection.) > > I discussed my draft implementation in #debian-www a week or so ago. For > those who are curious, the debian.net list and page I put together can be > viewed at: > > http://ircbots.debian.net/misc/debiandotnet > > (that URL just being a tmpdir on a machine with the right CSS and image > files in the right places for the debian theme) > > The reaction from #debian-www was underwhelming. > > * there was a suggestion to move this somewhere under /devel instead. That's > easy to do, but these are resources for both users and developers, so that > doesn't necessarily improve things. > > * there was a suggestion that DSA should generate this directly and include > it on db.debian.org. I've not talked to DSA about this idea but would > happily help them do that if they wanted. > > * the demo page includes the "description" from the existing wiki page [1] > and a description of the domain seems like a sensible thing to have. Any TXT > records that have been defined in LDAP for a domain are also used for the > descriptions. Since TXT records can't be defined for CNAME entries, I can't > see a good way of allowing the domain owner of a CNAME to provide or update > a description, unless LDAP were to carry TXT records for CNAMEs for > documentation purposes but ignore them when generating the zone file. [2] > > And that's where everything ground to a halt. Suggestions welcome. > > [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains > > [2] Previous suggestions in this thread to use TXT records to find out > who owns the domain (dig +short -ttxt love.debian.net) also fail for > records that are CNAME records rather than A records for example, "dig > +short -ttxt x.debian.net". 50% of all the debian.net records are > CNAME not A so this method works half the time... Maybe we should > publish a list of domain owners on the web? I wouldn't worry too much about "underwhelming" feedback, maybe people were just busy, not around or, legitimately, have different views on how to implement this. But this is also why it is important to document the state of this in a more stable place, and why I'm now submitting a bug. I think we should have an official place that both documents what the *.debian.net namespace is for (from the user POV) and provides an automatically generated list of entries, together with the respective contact points. AFAICT your implementation does exactly that: many thanks fo
Bug#856691: marked as done (Minor tweaks to webpages about the bug-tracking system)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 20:47:52 +0200 with message-id <25906.52056.998096.684...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #856691, regarding Minor tweaks to webpages about the bug-tracking system to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 856691: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856691 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Can the following 3 things be clarified on the website: * The item in the e-mails below about X-Debbugs-No-Ack & other pseudo-headers. * On https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer there is a Table-of-Contents entry that says: "Recording that you have passed on a bug report". This can sound like "pass" in the Python programming language, i.e., "ignored." Maybe this can be reworded like "Recording that you have notified someone else of a bug report". * On https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting , about 2/3 of the way down, it says "If wish to report" instead of "If you wish to report". Thanks. Original Message Subject: Re: No-Ack pseudo-header didn't seem to work From: d...@debian.org To: dg1727 ow...@bugs.debian.org On Fri, 03 Mar 2017, dg1727 wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854326#10 has an > X-Debbugs-No-Ack pseudo-header, but I got an ack e-mail anyway. > > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting says "the contents of this > header do not matter". The psuedoheader parsing code is a bit different from the header parsing code, and requires that there is a content after the colon. [This limitation doesn't exist for the headers, though.] So... the content doesn't matter, but pseudoheaders need content. -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com--- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- I've fixed the third of your things. The other things do not seem to be that important, because noone else complained about this. IMO there's no need to fix those, so closing. -- regards Thomas--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#1053935: www.debian.org: outdated debian-cd, debian-archive, debian-ports mirror lists
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #1053935 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: outdated debian-cd, debian-archive, debian-ports mirror lists Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1053935: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053935 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1034832: marked as done (www.debian.org: Distribution Archives: ftp.riken.jp no longer hosts debian-archives mirror)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:08:37 + with message-id <6532b41555ddb_52394c-...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1034832 fixed in mirrors has caused the Debian Bug report #1034832, regarding www.debian.org: Distribution Archives: ftp.riken.jp no longer hosts debian-archives mirror to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1034832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034832 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: william.poe...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, The archive mirror ftp.riken.jp no longer hosts the debian-archives mirror. This has been verified on 2023-04-25. Affected page: https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, Bug #1034832 in mirrors reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/mirror-team/masterlist/-/commit/768dc1d40635af5c2e352a50453b49c71a98bce2 Drop ftp.riken.jp from debian-archive provider Closes: #1034832 (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1034832--- End Message ---
