Re: xfree86 4.0.1 phase2 v29 debs for debian 2.2 potato

2000-11-01 Thread Charl P. Botha

On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 05:50:27PM -0800, Tal Danzig wrote:
> Were there any major hangups?
> or (fingers crossed) was it just a matter of apt-get source blah?

On my system I had to restart the build about 4 or 5 times, all due to
little missing things.  But now it's just a matter of getting the stuff,
editing the control file, and building, as my potato system is setup
correctly for this now.  If you read
http://cpbotha.net/building_brandens_phase2_debs_on_potato.HOWTO, that will
tell you exactly what you need to do to build these on your system.

Charl

-- 
charl p. botha  | computer graphics and cad/cam 
http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: missing joystick_drv.o

2000-11-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:25:13PM +0100, Jens Hoffmann wrote:
> i tried to setup my joystick as an core input device for X (phase2v29 on
> i386),
> but unfortunately there is no joystick_drv.o in modules/input.
> i, then tried to build the thing from source and found that
> JoystickSupport
> is commented out in the host.def file. 
> is this on purpose or just over seen ?

This is probably an oversight.  I'll look into it.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson |I am sorry, but what you have mistaken
Debian GNU/Linux|for malicious intent is nothing more
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |than sheer incompetence!
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |-- J. L. Rizzo II


pgpWGU55fF0mx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[dickey@herndon4.his.com: http://x54.deja.com/=dnc/[ST_rn=ps,ST_m=ps]/threadmsg_ct.xp?AN=687793]

2000-11-01 Thread Branden Robinson
This is regarding the x-terminal-emulator thread.

- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: http://x54.deja.com/=dnc/[ST_rn=ps,ST_m=ps]/threadmsg_ct.xp?AN=687793
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:55:18 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-URL: 
http://x54.deja.com/=dnc/[ST_rn=ps,ST_m=ps]/threadmsg_ct.xp?AN=687793069.1&mhitnum=5&CONTEXT=972985611.1187774515
X-Mailer: Lynx, Version 2.8.4dev.13
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by home.dickey.net id 
EAA00373

you forgot the -fn option (all emulators should support -rv as well).

>   Re: x-terminal-emulator
>   Author:   Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   Date: 2000/10/30
>   Forum:linux.debian.devel
>
>   author posting history
>   Post Reply  ·  Prev  ·  Next
>   _
>
>--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:08:32PM -0800, Bradley Bell wrote:
>> isn't xterm the 'de facto' standard?  it would seem to me that any options
>> xterm understands ought to be supported by x-terminal-emulator.  If
>> a certain terminal emulater is not xterm compatible, it would be trivial =
>to
>> provide an 'xterm compatibility wrapper', and have x-terminal-emulator po=
>int
>> to that.=20
>
>Nononono.  I love xterm to death, but requiring support for its many, many
>options is the death of a thousand cuts.  Most other terminal emulators
>don't fool with the Tektronix 4014 emulation, for instance.  Try "man
>xterm" sometime and feel your head reel as the bajillions of options scroll
>by.
>
>I think requiring a *small* compatibility subset is the way to go.  There's
>not all that many things a terminal emulator needs to be able to
>configurably from the command line to satisfy the requirements of a program
>(as opposed to a user) that calls it:
>
>1) accept a geometry specification
>2) accept a title
>3) exec a specified command
>
>Maybe, *maybe* we should require -ls (login shell) support, but even that
>is pushing it, I think.
>
>As much as I love xterm, I don't think it's fair to require that every
>other X terminal emulator be just like it.
>
>--=20
>G. Branden Robinson |  One man's theology is another man's
>Debian GNU/Linux|  belly laugh.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  -- Robert Heinlein
>http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com

- End forwarded message -

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux   | Please do not look directly into laser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  | with remaining eye.
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |


pgpJqg8QRkgWi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Question about FontPath

2000-11-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 08:56:59AM +0100, Torbjörn Andersson wrote:
> This may be a stupid question, or maybe I just didn't RTFM closely
> enough, but Dexter (at least in phase2v29) puts the following into
> XF86Config-4:
> 
> FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
> FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
> 
> I thought, based on the the manual page and the output from
> xf86config, that it was supposed to be:
> 
> FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
> FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled"
> 
> Did I misunderstand something, or does it make no difference? The
> closest thing to an answer that I could find just said that the
> "attributes are introduced by a ':' character", which I guess could
> mean either way.

This might be a bug in dexter; thanks for pointing this out.  I'll look
into it.

> (By the way, my recent problems with X hanging at startup unless I
> either install xfs or remove "unix/:7100" from the font path seem to
> have gone away now. I don't know how or why. The CHANGELOG mentions a
> recent "infinite loop problem that can show up on server resets" but
> I don't know if that's even remotely related.)

Hrm, as I understand it, if the X server doesn't find a font server there,
it should drop that FPE (font path element) from the list and move on.
Which, anecdotally, is what it seems to do for me.

Can anyone else repro this problem?  Does the X server get hung up if it's
looking for a font server that isn't there?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson |  One man's theology is another man's
Debian GNU/Linux|  belly laugh.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  -- Robert Heinlein
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |


pgpUz7hOg381h.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[edi@gmx.de: no dependency to xserver-xfree86]

2000-11-01 Thread Branden Robinson
This is what task packages are for.  Working on those tonight.

- Forwarded message from Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: no dependency to xserver-xfree86
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 18:15:22 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

Hi, while upgrading xfree 3.3.6 to 4.0.1 I noticed that there is no
dependency to xserver-xfree86 server, so it isn't installed automaticaly
(ugly, was not easy for to find the name of the package). Apt also
upgrades the old xbase-clients package with newer one, which doesn't
contain some important tools like mkfontdir and mkdirhier.

Gr{us,eeting}s,
Eduard.
-- 
=
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; HP: http://eduard.bloch.com/edecosi
0xEDF008C5(GnuPG): E6EB 98E2 B885 8FF0 6C04  5C1D E106 481E EDF0 08C5
**
Definition of Windows 9x:
A 32 bit upgrade to a 16 bit extensions for an 8 bit operating system
designed to run on a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company that doesn´t
like 1 bit of competition.



- End forwarded message -

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|I just wanted to see what it looked like
Debian GNU/Linux   |in a spotlight.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |-- Jim Morrison
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |


pgpTJckr9InbD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Question about FontPath

2000-11-01 Thread Frank Belew

On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 10:11:25PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001101 21:16]:
> > Can anyone else repro this problem?  Does the X server get hung up if it's
> > looking for a font server that isn't there?
> 
> I tried and failed to make my X server hang.
> 
> I ran `apt-get remove xfs', added
> FontPath "unix/:7100"
> to the top of my Files section of my XF86Config-4 file, and restarted X.
> The only problem I notice is that my sawmill menu fonts aren't nearly as
> clean as they used to be. (It just looks like a different font, perhaps.
> I don't know why. :) (I take that back. Fonts in mozilla aren't good
> either.)
> 
Fonts in mozilla suck, period
Don't use it as a judge

Your local unfriendly mozilla maintainer
 
--
Frank aka Myth

The unix learning curve may be steep, but at least you only have to climb
it once -- unknown


 PGP signature


Re: Question about FontPath

2000-11-01 Thread Seth Arnold

* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001101 21:16]:
> Can anyone else repro this problem?  Does the X server get hung up if it's
> looking for a font server that isn't there?

I tried and failed to make my X server hang.

I ran `apt-get remove xfs', added
FontPath "unix/:7100"
to the top of my Files section of my XF86Config-4 file, and restarted X.
The only problem I notice is that my sawmill menu fonts aren't nearly as
clean as they used to be. (It just looks like a different font, perhaps.
I don't know why. :) (I take that back. Fonts in mozilla aren't good
either.)

All the same, no crash. No hang.

-- 
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really
impressed down here, I can tell you.''


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




[edi@gmx.de: no dependency to xserver-xfree86]

2000-11-01 Thread Branden Robinson

This is what task packages are for.  Working on those tonight.

- Forwarded message from Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: no dependency to xserver-xfree86
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 18:15:22 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

Hi, while upgrading xfree 3.3.6 to 4.0.1 I noticed that there is no
dependency to xserver-xfree86 server, so it isn't installed automaticaly
(ugly, was not easy for to find the name of the package). Apt also
upgrades the old xbase-clients package with newer one, which doesn't
contain some important tools like mkfontdir and mkdirhier.

Gr{us,eeting}s,
Eduard.
-- 
=
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; HP: http://eduard.bloch.com/edecosi
0xEDF008C5(GnuPG): E6EB 98E2 B885 8FF0 6C04  5C1D E106 481E EDF0 08C5
**
Definition of Windows 9x:
A 32 bit upgrade to a 16 bit extensions for an 8 bit operating system
designed to run on a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company that doesn´t
like 1 bit of competition.



- End forwarded message -

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|I just wanted to see what it looked like
Debian GNU/Linux   |in a spotlight.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |-- Jim Morrison
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |

 PGP signature


Re: missing joystick_drv.o

2000-11-01 Thread Branden Robinson

On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:25:13PM +0100, Jens Hoffmann wrote:
> i tried to setup my joystick as an core input device for X (phase2v29 on
> i386),
> but unfortunately there is no joystick_drv.o in modules/input.
> i, then tried to build the thing from source and found that
> JoystickSupport
> is commented out in the host.def file. 
> is this on purpose or just over seen ?

This is probably an oversight.  I'll look into it.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson |I am sorry, but what you have mistaken
Debian GNU/Linux|for malicious intent is nothing more
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |than sheer incompetence!
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |-- J. L. Rizzo II

 PGP signature


[dickey@herndon4.his.com: http://x54.deja.com/=dnc/[ST_rn=ps,ST_m=ps]/threadmsg_ct.xp?AN=687793]

2000-11-01 Thread Branden Robinson

This is regarding the x-terminal-emulator thread.

- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: http://x54.deja.com/=dnc/[ST_rn=ps,ST_m=ps]/threadmsg_ct.xp?AN=687793
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 04:55:18 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-URL: 
http://x54.deja.com/=dnc/[ST_rn=ps,ST_m=ps]/threadmsg_ct.xp?AN=687793069.1&mhitnum=5&CONTEXT=972985611.1187774515
X-Mailer: Lynx, Version 2.8.4dev.13
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by home.dickey.net id EAA00373

you forgot the -fn option (all emulators should support -rv as well).

>   Re: x-terminal-emulator
>   Author:   Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   Date: 2000/10/30
>   Forum:linux.debian.devel
>
>   author posting history
>   Post Reply  ·  Prev  ·  Next
>   _
>
>--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:08:32PM -0800, Bradley Bell wrote:
>> isn't xterm the 'de facto' standard?  it would seem to me that any options
>> xterm understands ought to be supported by x-terminal-emulator.  If
>> a certain terminal emulater is not xterm compatible, it would be trivial =
>to
>> provide an 'xterm compatibility wrapper', and have x-terminal-emulator po=
>int
>> to that.=20
>
>Nononono.  I love xterm to death, but requiring support for its many, many
>options is the death of a thousand cuts.  Most other terminal emulators
>don't fool with the Tektronix 4014 emulation, for instance.  Try "man
>xterm" sometime and feel your head reel as the bajillions of options scroll
>by.
>
>I think requiring a *small* compatibility subset is the way to go.  There's
>not all that many things a terminal emulator needs to be able to
>configurably from the command line to satisfy the requirements of a program
>(as opposed to a user) that calls it:
>
>1) accept a geometry specification
>2) accept a title
>3) exec a specified command
>
>Maybe, *maybe* we should require -ls (login shell) support, but even that
>is pushing it, I think.
>
>As much as I love xterm, I don't think it's fair to require that every
>other X terminal emulator be just like it.
>
>--=20
>G. Branden Robinson |  One man's theology is another man's
>Debian GNU/Linux|  belly laugh.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  -- Robert Heinlein
>http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com

- End forwarded message -

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux   | Please do not look directly into laser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  | with remaining eye.
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |

 PGP signature


Re: Question about FontPath

2000-11-01 Thread Branden Robinson

On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 08:56:59AM +0100, Torbjörn Andersson wrote:
> This may be a stupid question, or maybe I just didn't RTFM closely
> enough, but Dexter (at least in phase2v29) puts the following into
> XF86Config-4:
> 
> FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
> FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
> 
> I thought, based on the the manual page and the output from
> xf86config, that it was supposed to be:
> 
> FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
> FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled"
> 
> Did I misunderstand something, or does it make no difference? The
> closest thing to an answer that I could find just said that the
> "attributes are introduced by a ':' character", which I guess could
> mean either way.

This might be a bug in dexter; thanks for pointing this out.  I'll look
into it.

> (By the way, my recent problems with X hanging at startup unless I
> either install xfs or remove "unix/:7100" from the font path seem to
> have gone away now. I don't know how or why. The CHANGELOG mentions a
> recent "infinite loop problem that can show up on server resets" but
> I don't know if that's even remotely related.)

Hrm, as I understand it, if the X server doesn't find a font server there,
it should drop that FPE (font path element) from the list and move on.
Which, anecdotally, is what it seems to do for me.

Can anyone else repro this problem?  Does the X server get hung up if it's
looking for a font server that isn't there?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson |  One man's theology is another man's
Debian GNU/Linux|  belly laugh.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  -- Robert Heinlein
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |

 PGP signature


Re: xfree86 4.0.1 phase2 v29 debs for debian 2.2 potato

2000-11-01 Thread Tal Danzig
Hello,

Were there any major hangups?
or (fingers crossed) was it just a matter of apt-get source blah?

Tal


On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:48:28 +0100, Charl P. Botha said:

>  Excuse the long subject, but maybe this mail will come up more often in
>   searches.
>   
>   I have built Branden's v29 phase2 xfree86 4.0.1 debs on a debian 2.2
>   (potato) system.  These will be TEMPORARILY available at
>   http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~cpbotha/local_debs/
>   and they are APT-able with the following lines in your 
> /etc/apt/sources.list:
>   
>   deb http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/%7Ecpbotha/local_debs/ cpbotha/i386/
>   deb http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/%7Ecpbotha/local_debs/ cpbotha/all/
>   
>   They will only be available from this location until Kenny MacDonald
>   transfers them to the UK mirror.  Then they should be available at:
>   http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/cpbotha
>   
>   You can build these debs on potato yourself as well, by following the HOWTO
>   at:
>   
> http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~cpbotha/building_brandens_phase2_debs_on_potato.HOWTO
>   
>   -- 
>   charl p. botha  | computer graphics and cad/cam 
>   http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/
>   
>   
>   --  
>   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   
>   

-- 
--
| Tal Danzig   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Linux by Libranet|
| Homepage:   |   The TOP Desktop Distribution   |
| http://awpti.org/~tal   |  http://www.libranet.com |
--
A Friendly .sig!!! (TM)




Re: xfree86 4.0.1 phase2 v29 debs for debian 2.2 potato

2000-11-01 Thread Tal Danzig

Hello,

Were there any major hangups?
or (fingers crossed) was it just a matter of apt-get source blah?

Tal


On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:48:28 +0100, Charl P. Botha said:

>  Excuse the long subject, but maybe this mail will come up more often in
>   searches.
>   
>   I have built Branden's v29 phase2 xfree86 4.0.1 debs on a debian 2.2
>   (potato) system.  These will be TEMPORARILY available at
>   http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~cpbotha/local_debs/
>   and they are APT-able with the following lines in your /etc/apt/sources.list:
>   
>   deb http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/%7Ecpbotha/local_debs/ cpbotha/i386/
>   deb http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/%7Ecpbotha/local_debs/ cpbotha/all/
>   
>   They will only be available from this location until Kenny MacDonald
>   transfers them to the UK mirror.  Then they should be available at:
>   http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/cpbotha
>   
>   You can build these debs on potato yourself as well, by following the HOWTO
>   at:
>   http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~cpbotha/building_brandens_phase2_debs_on_potato.HOWTO
>   
>   -- 
>   charl p. botha  | computer graphics and cad/cam 
>   http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/
>   
>   
>   --  
>   To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   
>   

-- 
--
| Tal Danzig   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Linux by Libranet|
| Homepage:   |   The TOP Desktop Distribution   |
| http://awpti.org/~tal   |  http://www.libranet.com |
--
A Friendly .sig!!! (TM)



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




[xfree86 4.0.1] problems

2000-11-01 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hello, I have some problems installing xfree86 4.0.1-0phase2v29. I am
not sure if I should report his as a bug, since 4.0.1 is still not in
the main distribution.

- Xlib doesn't support locales, so some programs crash or print warnings
  - and it was not funny to search for the reason of this crashes.

- Xserver don't want to connect to the font server, reason:
| X Error of failed request:  86
|   Major opcode of failed request:  51 (X_SetFontPath)
|   Serial number of failed request:  9
|   Current serial number in output stream:  11

  The font server is ok, I tried this with xfs and xfstt.

- XFree86 -configure doesn't work, it crashes (sig11) soon after probing
  cirrus_alpine.o.

Gr{us,eeting}s,
Eduard.
-- 
=
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; HP: http://eduard.bloch.com/edecosi
0xEDF008C5(GnuPG): E6EB 98E2 B885 8FF0 6C04  5C1D E106 481E EDF0 08C5
**
Die gute alte Zeit ist nichts anderes als eine rückwärts datierte Utopie.
   (Erich Wiesner)


pgprdf0fNXo36.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: xfree86 4.0.1 phase2 v29 debs for debian 2.2 potato

2000-11-01 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 06:54:52PM +, Kenneth MacDonald wrote:
> These are now at my site.  Add the following lines to your
> sources.list to get them...
> 
> deb http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/ cpbotha/all/
> deb http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/ cpbotha/i386/

Thanks very much Kenny!  I will now REMOVE them from
http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~cpbotha/local_debs.

-- 
charl p. botha  | computer graphics and cad/cam 
http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/



Re: xfree86 4.0.1 phase2 v29 debs for debian 2.2 potato

2000-11-01 Thread Kenneth MacDonald
These are now at my site.  Add the following lines to your
sources.list to get them...

deb http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/ cpbotha/all/
deb http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/ cpbotha/i386/

Kenny.

> "Charl" == Charl P Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Charl> Excuse the long subject, but maybe this mail will come up
Charl> more often in searches.

Charl> I have built Branden's v29 phase2 xfree86 4.0.1 debs on a
Charl> debian 2.2 (potato) system.  These will be TEMPORARILY
Charl> available at
Charl> http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~cpbotha/local_debs/ and they
Charl> are APT-able with the following lines in your
Charl> /etc/apt/sources.list:

Charl> deb http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/%7Ecpbotha/local_debs/
Charl> cpbotha/i386/ deb
Charl> http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/%7Ecpbotha/local_debs/
Charl> cpbotha/all/

Charl> They will only be available from this location until Kenny
Charl> MacDonald transfers them to the UK mirror.  Then they
Charl> should be available at:
Charl> http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/cpbotha

Charl> You can build these debs on potato yourself as well, by
Charl> following the HOWTO at:
Charl> 
http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~cpbotha/building_brandens_phase2_debs_on_potato.HOWTO

Charl> -- charl p. botha | computer graphics and cad/cam
Charl> http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/


Charl> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Charl> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of
Charl> "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
Kenny

ADML Support, EUCS, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland.



[xfree86 4.0.1] problems

2000-11-01 Thread Eduard Bloch

Hello, I have some problems installing xfree86 4.0.1-0phase2v29. I am
not sure if I should report his as a bug, since 4.0.1 is still not in
the main distribution.

- Xlib doesn't support locales, so some programs crash or print warnings
  - and it was not funny to search for the reason of this crashes.

- Xserver don't want to connect to the font server, reason:
| X Error of failed request:  86
|   Major opcode of failed request:  51 (X_SetFontPath)
|   Serial number of failed request:  9
|   Current serial number in output stream:  11

  The font server is ok, I tried this with xfs and xfstt.

- XFree86 -configure doesn't work, it crashes (sig11) soon after probing
  cirrus_alpine.o.

Gr{us,eeting}s,
Eduard.
-- 
=
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; HP: http://eduard.bloch.com/edecosi
0xEDF008C5(GnuPG): E6EB 98E2 B885 8FF0 6C04  5C1D E106 481E EDF0 08C5
**
Die gute alte Zeit ist nichts anderes als eine rückwärts datierte Utopie.
   (Erich Wiesner)

 PGP signature


Re: xfree86 4.0.1 phase2 v29 debs for debian 2.2 potato

2000-11-01 Thread Charl P. Botha

On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 06:54:52PM +, Kenneth MacDonald wrote:
> These are now at my site.  Add the following lines to your
> sources.list to get them...
> 
> deb http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/ cpbotha/all/
> deb http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/ cpbotha/i386/

Thanks very much Kenny!  I will now REMOVE them from
http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~cpbotha/local_debs.

-- 
charl p. botha  | computer graphics and cad/cam 
http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: xfree86 4.0.1 phase2 v29 debs for debian 2.2 potato

2000-11-01 Thread Kenneth MacDonald

These are now at my site.  Add the following lines to your
sources.list to get them...

deb http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/ cpbotha/all/
deb http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/ cpbotha/i386/

Kenny.

> "Charl" == Charl P Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Charl> Excuse the long subject, but maybe this mail will come up
Charl> more often in searches.

Charl> I have built Branden's v29 phase2 xfree86 4.0.1 debs on a
Charl> debian 2.2 (potato) system.  These will be TEMPORARILY
Charl> available at
Charl> http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~cpbotha/local_debs/ and they
Charl> are APT-able with the following lines in your
Charl> /etc/apt/sources.list:

Charl> deb http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/%7Ecpbotha/local_debs/
Charl> cpbotha/i386/ deb
Charl> http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/%7Ecpbotha/local_debs/
Charl> cpbotha/all/

Charl> They will only be available from this location until Kenny
Charl> MacDonald transfers them to the UK mirror.  Then they
Charl> should be available at:
Charl> http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/cpbotha

Charl> You can build these debs on potato yourself as well, by
Charl> following the HOWTO at:
Charl> 
http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~cpbotha/building_brandens_phase2_debs_on_potato.HOWTO

Charl> -- charl p. botha | computer graphics and cad/cam
Charl> http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/


Charl> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Charl> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of
Charl> "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
Kenny

ADML Support, EUCS, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




missing joystick_drv.o

2000-11-01 Thread Jens Hoffmann
hi,

i tried to setup my joystick as an core input device for X (phase2v29 on
i386),
but unfortunately there is no joystick_drv.o in modules/input.
i, then tried to build the thing from source and found that
JoystickSupport
is commented out in the host.def file. 
is this on purpose or just over seen ?

thanks,
Jens H.
-- 
No electrons were harmed during the creation of this message



missing joystick_drv.o

2000-11-01 Thread Jens Hoffmann

hi,

i tried to setup my joystick as an core input device for X (phase2v29 on
i386),
but unfortunately there is no joystick_drv.o in modules/input.
i, then tried to build the thing from source and found that
JoystickSupport
is commented out in the host.def file. 
is this on purpose or just over seen ?

thanks,
Jens H.
-- 
No electrons were harmed during the creation of this message


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Optimized binaries for X

2000-11-01 Thread djw
Hi, all. I'm going to try building binaries optimized for K6-x processors
to see if performance is changed. 


Just put this in debian/patches/100_debian_host.def.diff:

+#define DefaultGcc2i386Opt -O5 -march=k6

Just make sure that that #define is not commented out.
 

Also for those who have s3virge/gx2 chipsets, Kevin Brosius (the s3virge
maintainer for XFree86) suggested this fix:




#define WAITFIFO(n) if(ps3v->NoPCIRetry) \
 while(((INREG(SUBSYS_STAT_REG) >> 9) & 0x60) < n){}

(The bits are different...  GX2 is supposed to be compatible, but it
also has a deeper FIFO and more 'FIFO available slot' bits in this
register.  Seems that our other check was worse. ;( )

Kevin

(This is in drivers/s3virge/s3v_macros.h for anyone else watching.)





I'll let you know how both of these come along.

-- 
**  Derek J Witt**
*   Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
*   Home Page: http://www.flinthills.com/~djw/   *
*** "Houston, the Eagle has landed and laid an egg!" -- Unknown **




Question about FontPath

2000-11-01 Thread Torbjörn Andersson
This may be a stupid question, or maybe I just didn't RTFM closely
enough, but Dexter (at least in phase2v29) puts the following into
XF86Config-4:

FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"

I thought, based on the the manual page and the output from
xf86config, that it was supposed to be:

FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled"

Did I misunderstand something, or does it make no difference? The
closest thing to an answer that I could find just said that the
"attributes are introduced by a ':' character", which I guess could
mean either way.

Torbjörn Andersson

(By the way, my recent problems with X hanging at startup unless I
either install xfs or remove "unix/:7100" from the font path seem to
have gone away now. I don't know how or why. The CHANGELOG mentions a
recent "infinite loop problem that can show up on server resets" but
I don't know if that's even remotely related.)