Bug#178242: confirmation
> After I upgraded from xlibmesa3 4.2.1-3 to 4.2.1-5 (including -gl and > -glu), glxgears and all other programs that make use of OpenGL simply > result in an empty screen/window; downgrading to -3 again (and > deleting xlibmesa3-gl{,u} fixes the problem completely. I can confirm this behaviour. I just got a Radeon 7500 and had to downgrade to -3 (from testing) to get mesa/glx stuff working. With -5, everything (glxgears, stellarium, tuxracer) just displays a blank window. Greg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#179407: xterm: bold fonts do not work with widechars (and consequently utf-8 mode)
Package: xterm Version: 4.2.1-5 Severity: normal Whenever XTerm's wide character support is turned on (whether by command line or X resource, or as part of turning on UTF-8 support), boldfaced characters will never show up at all. As soon as it's turned off, boldface fonts show back up. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux d-ni 2.4.19 #1 Tue Sep 3 21:16:33 EDT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.3-7FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libncurses5 5.3.20021109-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libxaw7 4.2.1-5X Athena widget set library ii xlibs 4.2.1-5X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information -- ~/.Xresources # XTerm Geometry Equivalencies: # 80x24 Neep Alt: 404x268 # 80x24 fixed:484x292 # 20x5 Neep Alt: 104x59 # 20x5 fixed: 124x64 # The Universal Basics XTerm*saveLines: 500 XTerm*scrollBar: False XTerm*foreground: white # XTerm*background: VioletRed4 # XTerm*background: DarkSlateGray # XTerm*background: Navy # XTerm*background: SlateBlue4 XTerm*background: gray20 # Font Stuff # Neep Alt: # XTerm*font: -jmk-neep-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 # XTerm.geometry: 80x24+304+237 # Fixed: # XTerm*font: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 # XTerm*geometry: 80x24+264+224 # Fixed UTF-8: XTerm*utf8: 1 XTerm*font: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*boldFont: -misc-fixed-bold-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*widefont: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*wideBoldFont: -misc-fixed-bold-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*geometry: 80x24+264+224 # Customizations # XTerm XTerm*title: XTerm: d'ni # rxvt Rxvt*title: rxvt: d'ni Rxvt*mfont: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 # aterm Aterm*title: aterm: d'ni # rxvt on Riven rivenrxvt*title: rxvt: riven rivenrxvt*background: DarkOrchid4 # Special Purpose # Links Windows (rxvt or xterm) linkswindow*background: black linkswindow*foreground: grey89 linkswindow*geometry: 80x24+0+80 # Log Windows (aterm) logwin*font: -jmk-neep-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 logwin*transparent: True # # Logwin Text Colors # logwin*foreground: DodgerBlue1 logwin*foreground: Red # logwin*foreground: SpringGreen # "sudovalid" popup xterm sudovalid*geometry: 20x5+441+349 # End of XTerm Section #bsod xscreensaver *doNT: true *doWindows: true *doAmiga: false *doMac: true *doMacsBug: false *doSCO: true *doAtari: false *doBlitDamage: false *doSparcLinux: true *doSolaris: false *doBSD: true #sonar xscreensaver *ping: /home/jrhunter/.sonar-hosts #*ping: simulation #*ttl: 100 #*teamAName: S #*teamACount: 7 #*teamBCount: 0
Bug#179390: Keyboard input with a type5 keyboard is b0rked.
package: xfree86 version: 4.2.1-5 severity: grave X is now unusable on my Ultra 5 running unstable. It seems that the keymap is messed up. I can use the console as normal. However, when I try to use X my keys are shifted to the right by a key for the first two letter rows and I don't know what happened to the rest. I didn't notice before because I hadn't restarted X in a while. My XF86Config-4 hasn't changed since october. -rw-r--r--1 root root 3049 2002-02-10 11:04 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 And the following InputDevice section of XF86Config-4 was working fine until I logged out and X got restarted on me. Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "sun" Option "XkbModel" "type5" Option "XkbLayout" "us" EndSection James A. Morrison
Bug#179407: xterm: bold fonts do not work with widechars (and consequently utf-8 mode)
Package: xterm Version: 4.2.1-5 Severity: normal Whenever XTerm's wide character support is turned on (whether by command line or X resource, or as part of turning on UTF-8 support), boldfaced characters will never show up at all. As soon as it's turned off, boldface fonts show back up. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux d-ni 2.4.19 #1 Tue Sep 3 21:16:33 EDT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.3-7FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libncurses5 5.3.20021109-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libxaw7 4.2.1-5X Athena widget set library ii xlibs 4.2.1-5X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information -- ~/.Xresources # XTerm Geometry Equivalencies: # 80x24 Neep Alt: 404x268 # 80x24 fixed:484x292 # 20x5 Neep Alt: 104x59 # 20x5 fixed: 124x64 # The Universal Basics XTerm*saveLines: 500 XTerm*scrollBar: False XTerm*foreground: white # XTerm*background: VioletRed4 # XTerm*background: DarkSlateGray # XTerm*background: Navy # XTerm*background: SlateBlue4 XTerm*background: gray20 # Font Stuff # Neep Alt: # XTerm*font: -jmk-neep-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 # XTerm.geometry: 80x24+304+237 # Fixed: # XTerm*font: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 # XTerm*geometry: 80x24+264+224 # Fixed UTF-8: XTerm*utf8: 1 XTerm*font: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*boldFont: -misc-fixed-bold-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*widefont: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*wideBoldFont: -misc-fixed-bold-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 XTerm*geometry: 80x24+264+224 # Customizations # XTerm XTerm*title: XTerm: d'ni # rxvt Rxvt*title: rxvt: d'ni Rxvt*mfont: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso10646-1 # aterm Aterm*title: aterm: d'ni # rxvt on Riven rivenrxvt*title: rxvt: riven rivenrxvt*background: DarkOrchid4 # Special Purpose # Links Windows (rxvt or xterm) linkswindow*background: black linkswindow*foreground: grey89 linkswindow*geometry: 80x24+0+80 # Log Windows (aterm) logwin*font: -jmk-neep-medium-r-semicondensed-*-11-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1 logwin*transparent: True # # Logwin Text Colors # logwin*foreground: DodgerBlue1 logwin*foreground: Red # logwin*foreground: SpringGreen # "sudovalid" popup xterm sudovalid*geometry: 20x5+441+349 # End of XTerm Section #bsod xscreensaver *doNT: true *doWindows: true *doAmiga: false *doMac: true *doMacsBug: false *doSCO: true *doAtari: false *doBlitDamage: false *doSparcLinux: true *doSolaris: false *doBSD: true #sonar xscreensaver *ping: /home/jrhunter/.sonar-hosts #*ping: simulation #*ttl: 100 #*teamAName: S #*teamACount: 7 #*teamBCount: 0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#179390: Keyboard input with a type5 keyboard is b0rked.
package: xfree86 version: 4.2.1-5 severity: grave X is now unusable on my Ultra 5 running unstable. It seems that the keymap is messed up. I can use the console as normal. However, when I try to use X my keys are shifted to the right by a key for the first two letter rows and I don't know what happened to the rest. I didn't notice before because I hadn't restarted X in a while. My XF86Config-4 hasn't changed since october. -rw-r--r--1 root root 3049 2002-02-10 11:04 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 And the following InputDevice section of XF86Config-4 was working fine until I logged out and X got restarted on me. Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "sun" Option "XkbModel" "type5" Option "XkbLayout" "us" EndSection James A. Morrison -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#178496 acknowledged by developer (Bug#178358: fixed in gnomesu 0.2.99-3)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 178496 Bug#178496: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type Bug#178358: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#179352: xfree86: [wishlist] Updated brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation
Package: xfree86 Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-01 Severity: wishlist Hi Branden, After some time laging behind the others translators, here's me again with yet-another-xfree86's-pt_BR-translation. I think it's the very first one I did since the po-debconf transition. Also, I would like to note that this translation was completely done based on a previous translation I found at [1] (note that [1] is not available there anymore). Since then, you released -5 packages and I couldn't prepare my translation in time for -5 release. Anyway, I downloaded [2], which is suposed to be the latest translation shipped with -5 packages. A diff from the previous -4 and the actual -5 templates showed me only this unidiff'd output : == --- xfree86_4.2.1-4_pt_BR.po2003-01-17 23:03:20.0 -0200 +++ xfree86_4.2.1-5_pt_BR.po2003-01-23 10:21:37.0 -0200 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n" -"POT-Creation-Date: 2002-11-22 19:37-0500\n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-01-21 13:16-0500\n" "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n" "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" == So I only changed Project-Id-version and PO-Revision-Date headers, finished the remaining translation and I'm sending it to the BTS. Let me know if anything's wrong or if I should do anything else besides what I already did. Regards, [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/~barbier/l10n/material/po/unstable/main/x/xfree86/debian/po/xfree86_4.2.1-4_pt_BR.po.gz [2] http://ftp-master.debian.org/~barbier/l10n/material/po/unstable/main/x/xfree86/debian/po/xfree86_4.2.1-5_pt_BR.po.gz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux foobar 2.4.20 #1 Sáb Jan 4 21:21:16 BRST 2003 i586 Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (ignored: LC_ALL set) # SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE. # Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER # This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package. # FIRST AUTHOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, YEAR. # #Translators, please read /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # #, fuzzy msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: xfree86-4.2.1-5\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2002-11-22 19:37-0500\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2003-02-01 16:16-0200\n" "Last-Translator: André Luís Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: Debian-BR Project \n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:4 msgid "Select the desired default display manager." msgstr "Selecione o gerenciador de display padrão preferido." #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:4 msgid "" "A display manager is a program that provides graphical login capabilities " "for the X Window System." msgstr "" "Um gerenciador de display é um programa que provê capacidades de login " "gráfico para o Sistema de Janelas X." #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:4 msgid "" "Only one display manager can manage a given X server, but multiple display " "manager packages are installed. Please select which display manager should " "run by default." msgstr "" "Somente um gerenciador de display pode gerenciar um dado servidor X, mas " "diversos pacotes de gerenciadores de display estão instalados. Por favor " "selecione qual gerenciador de display deverá ser executado como padrão." #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:4 msgid "" "(Multiple display managers can run simultaneously if they are configured to " "manage different servers; to achieve this, configure the display managers " "accordingly, edit each of their init scripts in /etc/init.d, and disable the " "check for a default display manager.)" msgstr "" "(Múltiplos gerenciadores de display podem rodar simultaneamente se eles " "estão configurados para gerenciar servidores diferentes; para conseguir " "isso, configure o gerenciador de display apropriadamente, edite cada um de " "seus scripts de inicialização em /etc/init.d, e desabilite a checagem por um " "gerenciador de display padrão.)" #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:26 msgid "Do you wish to stop the xdm daemon?" msgstr "Deseja parar o daemon xdm ?" #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:26 msgid "" "The X display manager (xdm) daemon is typically stopped on package upgrade " "and removal, but it appears to be managing at least one running X session. " "If xdm is stopped now, any X sessions it manages will be terminated. " "Otherwise you may leave xdm running, and the new version will take effect " "the next time the daemon is restarted." msgstr "" "O daemon do gerenciador de display do X (xdm) é tipicamente parado em " "atualizações e remoções de pacotes, mas parece que o mesmo está " "atualmente gerenciando pelo menos uma sessão X em execuçã
Bug#178358: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2003 13:17:12 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#178358: fixed in gnomesu 0.2.99-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2003 15:02:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 25 09:02:43 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (mf2.bredband.net) [195.54.106.37] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18cRpS-0004yu-00; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 09:02:42 -0600 Received: from laga ([213.113.204.118]) by mf2.bredband.net with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:01:40 +0100 Received: from lpha ([192.168.21.23] helo=lpha.ch.lugn.nu) by laga with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18cRoR-00034B-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:01:39 +0100 Received: by lpha.ch.lugn.nu (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:01:39 +0100 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:01:39 +0100 From: Martin Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xserver-xfree86: new xserver doesn't start (alpha specific bug?) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1497 20D0 96A3 B9FF 26BD FD2B 814A 6221 6F80 43E2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-5 Severity: normal It seems like the xserver in this new version is impossible to start. My guess is that this is a platform specific bug to the alpha port. An identical configuration file and a few other tried worked with 4.2.1-3 (4.2.1-4 failed compilation according to http://buildd.debian.org/). To my eyes the error seems to be with loadable modules. The following two lines are repeated several thousand times in XFree86.0.log. Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 18 Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 17 I'm attaching a stripped down version. Since the file has 15752 lines. Please let me know if I can provide any additional information. -- Package-specific info: 01:0a.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage Pro 215GP (= rev 5c) 01:0a.0 Class 0300: 1002:4750 (rev 5c) ### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the # Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config-4" at the shell prompt.) # # If you want your changes to this file preserved by dexconf, only make cha= nges # before the "### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION" line above, and/or after the # "### END DEBCONF SECTION" line below. # # To change things within the debconf section, run the command: # dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 # as root. Also see "How do I add custom sections to a dexconf-generated # XF86Config or XF86Config-4 file?" in /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz. Section "Files" FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" EndSection Section "Module" Load"GLcore" Load"bitmap" Load"dbe" Load"ddc" Load"dri" Load"extmod" Load"freetype" Load"glx" Load"int10" Load"record" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier
Bug#178496: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2003 13:17:12 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#178358: fixed in gnomesu 0.2.99-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2003 17:08:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 26 11:08:40 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18cqGs-0003pz-00; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 11:08:39 -0600 Received: from fwd02.sul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 18cqGn-0003T0-0B; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:08:33 +0100 Received: from juist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fmrl02.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 18cqGa-0WoruiC; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:08:20 +0100 Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18cqGZ-0002k9-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:08:19 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: X server module loading broken on Alpha due to gcc 3.2's new relocation type X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:08:19 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-5 Severity: important [...] (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 18 Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 17 Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 18 [...] gcc 3.2 supports a new kind of relocation, which facilitates instruction scheduling. The X ELF module loader doesn't know about it, and therefore fails to load any module. There's a patch mentioned at http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists/axp-list/msg19583.html but it has at least one obvious bug. I will whether I find something upstream or at Ret Hat, or write something myself. Falk -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux juist 2.5.59 #4 Sat Jan 18 12:46:41 CET 2003 alpha Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages xserver-xfree86 depends on: ii debconf 1.2.21 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6.1 2.3.1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii xserver-common4.2.1-3files and utilities common to all ii zlib1g1:1.1.4-9 compression library - runtime -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 178358-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2003 18:23:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 01 12:23:07 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18f2IE-0004YT-00; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 12:23:07 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18f2CW-000553-00; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 13:17:12 -0500 From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $ Subject: Bug#178358: fixed in gnomesu 0.2.99-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 13:17:12 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnomesu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnomesu_0.2.99-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnomesu/gnomesu_0.2.99-3.diff.gz gnomesu_0.2.99-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gnomesu/gnomesu_0.2.99-3.dsc gnomesu_0.2.99-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnomesu/gnomesu_0.2.99-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnomesu package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the ar
Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnomesu 0.2.99-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 178358 + fixed Bug#178358: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type Tags were: fixed upstream pending patch Bug#178496: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type Tags added: fixed > tag 178406 + fixed Bug#178406: gnomesu: looks for .glade file in the wrong directory Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed > tag 178633 + fixed Bug#178633: gnomesu_0.2.5+20030121-1(unstable/sparc): missing build-depends Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed > tag 179221 + fixed Bug#179221: RFA: gnomesu -- Allow users to run commands as root, after prompting for password Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: XF86 4.2.1 and Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 with Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card
> Sorry for asking, but _where_ and how should I change my BusID? In the > XF86Config-4 file, or is there a way to give a PCI-Bus another ID? > If I need to change it in the XF86Config-4, what excactly do I have to > insert? I > > alread tried several formats (like PCI 0:3:0 ; PCI:00:03:0...) > > Output of lspci is: > > 00:00.0 Host bridge: Acer Laboratories Inc. [ALi] M1445 > 00:03.0 Multimedia video controller: 3Dfx Interactive, Inc. Voodoo 2 (rev 02) > 00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C > (rev > > 10) > 00:05.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. 86c325 [ViRGE] (rev 02) > > lspci -n: > > 00:00.0 Class 0600: 10b9:1445 > 00:03.0 Class 0400: 121a:0002 (rev 02) > 00:04.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10) > 00:05.0 Class 0300: 5333:5631 (rev 02) > > Thank you in advance > > Lucia > > Jsen wrote: > > > Try changing your BusID, I had that problem once. To confirm just do a > > "lspci -n" > > > > Good Luck. > > > > * Lucia Cosima Eiselstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > Do you have the libglide2 package installed? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I have. Do I have to do something else after installing the > > > deb-package? Following "man glide", I figured out that > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so is a link to /usr/lib/libglide.so.2, > not > > > to /usr/lib/libglide2x.so how it should be. Changed that, changed the > > > device > > > > section to: > > > > > > Section "Device" > > > Identifier "Diamond MonsterII" > > > Driver "glide" > > > Option "dpms" "on" > > > # BusID "PCI:00:03:02" > > > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > > > EndSection > > > > > > Still the same result and log, here the last lines: > > > > > > (II) LoadModule: "glide" > > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glide_drv.o > > > (II) Module glide: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > > > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > > > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > > > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 > > > (II) Loading sub module "glide2x" > > > (II) LoadModule: "glide2x" > > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so > > > (II) LoadModule: "mouse" > > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/mouse_drv.o > > > (II) Module mouse: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > > > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > > > Module class: XFree86 XInput Driver > > > ABI class: XFree86 XInput driver, version 0.3 > > > (II) GLIDE: driver for Glide devices (Voodoo cards): Voodoo > > > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > > > (EE) No devices detected. > > > > > > Fatal server error: > > > no screens found > > > > > > > > > It_s interesting that I wrote in the XF86Config-4 in the device section: > > > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > > > but in the logfile, X recognizes: > > > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > > > Is this right? > > > PCI 00:05:0 is the Diamond Stealth 3d 2000 card, not the expansion card. > > > > > > If needed, I'll send the whole logs and XF86Config again. > > > >
Processed: Re: Bug#178496 acknowledged by developer (Bug#178358: fixed in gnomesu 0.2.99-3)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 178496 Bug#178496: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type Bug#178358: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#179352: xfree86: [wishlist] Updated brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation
Package: xfree86 Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-01 Severity: wishlist Hi Branden, After some time laging behind the others translators, here's me again with yet-another-xfree86's-pt_BR-translation. I think it's the very first one I did since the po-debconf transition. Also, I would like to note that this translation was completely done based on a previous translation I found at [1] (note that [1] is not available there anymore). Since then, you released -5 packages and I couldn't prepare my translation in time for -5 release. Anyway, I downloaded [2], which is suposed to be the latest translation shipped with -5 packages. A diff from the previous -4 and the actual -5 templates showed me only this unidiff'd output : == --- xfree86_4.2.1-4_pt_BR.po2003-01-17 23:03:20.0 -0200 +++ xfree86_4.2.1-5_pt_BR.po2003-01-23 10:21:37.0 -0200 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n" -"POT-Creation-Date: 2002-11-22 19:37-0500\n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-01-21 13:16-0500\n" "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n" "Last-Translator: FULL NAME \n" "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" == So I only changed Project-Id-version and PO-Revision-Date headers, finished the remaining translation and I'm sending it to the BTS. Let me know if anything's wrong or if I should do anything else besides what I already did. Regards, [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/~barbier/l10n/material/po/unstable/main/x/xfree86/debian/po/xfree86_4.2.1-4_pt_BR.po.gz [2] http://ftp-master.debian.org/~barbier/l10n/material/po/unstable/main/x/xfree86/debian/po/xfree86_4.2.1-5_pt_BR.po.gz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux foobar 2.4.20 #1 Sáb Jan 4 21:21:16 BRST 2003 i586 Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (ignored: LC_ALL set) # SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE. # Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER # This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package. # FIRST AUTHOR , YEAR. # #Translators, please read /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # #, fuzzy msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: xfree86-4.2.1-5\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2002-11-22 19:37-0500\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2003-02-01 16:16-0200\n" "Last-Translator: André Luís Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: Debian-BR Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:4 msgid "Select the desired default display manager." msgstr "Selecione o gerenciador de display padrão preferido." #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:4 msgid "" "A display manager is a program that provides graphical login capabilities " "for the X Window System." msgstr "" "Um gerenciador de display é um programa que provê capacidades de login " "gráfico para o Sistema de Janelas X." #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:4 msgid "" "Only one display manager can manage a given X server, but multiple display " "manager packages are installed. Please select which display manager should " "run by default." msgstr "" "Somente um gerenciador de display pode gerenciar um dado servidor X, mas " "diversos pacotes de gerenciadores de display estão instalados. Por favor " "selecione qual gerenciador de display deverá ser executado como padrão." #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:4 msgid "" "(Multiple display managers can run simultaneously if they are configured to " "manage different servers; to achieve this, configure the display managers " "accordingly, edit each of their init scripts in /etc/init.d, and disable the " "check for a default display manager.)" msgstr "" "(Múltiplos gerenciadores de display podem rodar simultaneamente se eles " "estão configurados para gerenciar servidores diferentes; para conseguir " "isso, configure o gerenciador de display apropriadamente, edite cada um de " "seus scripts de inicialização em /etc/init.d, e desabilite a checagem por um " "gerenciador de display padrão.)" #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:26 msgid "Do you wish to stop the xdm daemon?" msgstr "Deseja parar o daemon xdm ?" #. Description #: ../xdm.templates:26 msgid "" "The X display manager (xdm) daemon is typically stopped on package upgrade " "and removal, but it appears to be managing at least one running X session. " "If xdm is stopped now, any X sessions it manages will be terminated. " "Otherwise you may leave xdm running, and the new version will take effect " "the next time the daemon is restarted." msgstr "" "O daemon do gerenciador de display do X (xdm) é tipicamente parado em " "atualizações e remoções de pacotes, mas parece que o mesmo está " "atualmente gerenciando pelo menos uma sessão X em execução. Caso o xdm " "s
Bug#178358: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2003 13:17:12 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#178358: fixed in gnomesu 0.2.99-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2003 15:02:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 25 09:02:43 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (mf2.bredband.net) [195.54.106.37] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18cRpS-0004yu-00; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 09:02:42 -0600 Received: from laga ([213.113.204.118]) by mf2.bredband.net with ESMTP id <20030125150140.DVWR273.mf2@laga> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:01:40 +0100 Received: from lpha ([192.168.21.23] helo=lpha.ch.lugn.nu) by laga with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18cRoR-00034B-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:01:39 +0100 Received: by lpha.ch.lugn.nu (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:01:39 +0100 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 16:01:39 +0100 From: Martin Samuelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xserver-xfree86: new xserver doesn't start (alpha specific bug?) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1497 20D0 96A3 B9FF 26BD FD2B 814A 6221 6F80 43E2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-5 Severity: normal It seems like the xserver in this new version is impossible to start. My guess is that this is a platform specific bug to the alpha port. An identical configuration file and a few other tried worked with 4.2.1-3 (4.2.1-4 failed compilation according to http://buildd.debian.org/). To my eyes the error seems to be with loadable modules. The following two lines are repeated several thousand times in XFree86.0.log. Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 18 Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 17 I'm attaching a stripped down version. Since the file has 15752 lines. Please let me know if I can provide any additional information. -- Package-specific info: 01:0a.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage Pro 215GP (= rev 5c) 01:0a.0 Class 0300: 1002:4750 (rev 5c) ### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the # Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config-4" at the shell prompt.) # # If you want your changes to this file preserved by dexconf, only make cha= nges # before the "### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION" line above, and/or after the # "### END DEBCONF SECTION" line below. # # To change things within the debconf section, run the command: # dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 # as root. Also see "How do I add custom sections to a dexconf-generated # XF86Config or XF86Config-4 file?" in /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz. Section "Files" FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" EndSection Section "Module" Load"GLcore" Load"bitmap" Load"dbe" Load"ddc" Load"dri" Load"extmod" Load"freetype" Load"glx" Load"int10" Load"record" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" EndSection Section "InputDevice"
Bug#178496: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2003 13:17:12 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#178358: fixed in gnomesu 0.2.99-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2003 17:08:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 26 11:08:40 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18cqGs-0003pz-00; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 11:08:39 -0600 Received: from fwd02.sul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 18cqGn-0003T0-0B; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:08:33 +0100 Received: from juist (520046482682-0001@[80.131.85.76]) by fmrl02.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 18cqGa-0WoruiC; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:08:20 +0100 Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18cqGZ-0002k9-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:08:19 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: X server module loading broken on Alpha due to gcc 3.2's new relocation type X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:08:19 +0100 Message-Id:X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-5 Severity: important [...] (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 18 Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 17 Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 18 [...] gcc 3.2 supports a new kind of relocation, which facilitates instruction scheduling. The X ELF module loader doesn't know about it, and therefore fails to load any module. There's a patch mentioned at http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists/axp-list/msg19583.html but it has at least one obvious bug. I will whether I find something upstream or at Ret Hat, or write something myself. Falk -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux juist 2.5.59 #4 Sat Jan 18 12:46:41 CET 2003 alpha Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro Versions of packages xserver-xfree86 depends on: ii debconf 1.2.21 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6.1 2.3.1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii xserver-common4.2.1-3files and utilities common to all ii zlib1g1:1.1.4-9 compression library - runtime -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 178358-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2003 18:23:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 01 12:23:07 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18f2IE-0004YT-00; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 12:23:07 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18f2CW-000553-00; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 13:17:12 -0500 From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $ Subject: Bug#178358: fixed in gnomesu 0.2.99-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 13:17:12 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnomesu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnomesu_0.2.99-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnomesu/gnomesu_0.2.99-3.diff.gz gnomesu_0.2.99-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gnomesu/gnomesu_0.2.99-3.dsc gnomesu_0.2.99-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnomesu/gnomesu_0.2.99-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnomesu package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with i
Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnomesu 0.2.99-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 178358 + fixed Bug#178358: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type Tags were: fixed upstream pending patch Bug#178496: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type Tags added: fixed > tag 178406 + fixed Bug#178406: gnomesu: looks for .glade file in the wrong directory Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed > tag 178633 + fixed Bug#178633: gnomesu_0.2.5+20030121-1(unstable/sparc): missing build-depends Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed > tag 179221 + fixed Bug#179221: RFA: gnomesu -- Allow users to run commands as root, after prompting for password Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XF86 4.2.1 and Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 with Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card
> Sorry for asking, but _where_ and how should I change my BusID? In the > XF86Config-4 file, or is there a way to give a PCI-Bus another ID? > If I need to change it in the XF86Config-4, what excactly do I have to insert? I > > alread tried several formats (like PCI 0:3:0 ; PCI:00:03:0...) > > Output of lspci is: > > 00:00.0 Host bridge: Acer Laboratories Inc. [ALi] M1445 > 00:03.0 Multimedia video controller: 3Dfx Interactive, Inc. Voodoo 2 (rev 02) > 00:04.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C (rev > > 10) > 00:05.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. 86c325 [ViRGE] (rev 02) > > lspci -n: > > 00:00.0 Class 0600: 10b9:1445 > 00:03.0 Class 0400: 121a:0002 (rev 02) > 00:04.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10) > 00:05.0 Class 0300: 5333:5631 (rev 02) > > Thank you in advance > > Lucia > > Jsen wrote: > > > Try changing your BusID, I had that problem once. To confirm just do a > > "lspci -n" > > > > Good Luck. > > > > * Lucia Cosima Eiselstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > Do you have the libglide2 package installed? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I have. Do I have to do something else after installing the > > > deb-package? Following "man glide", I figured out that > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so is a link to /usr/lib/libglide.so.2, > not > > > to /usr/lib/libglide2x.so how it should be. Changed that, changed the device > > > > section to: > > > > > > Section "Device" > > > Identifier "Diamond MonsterII" > > > Driver "glide" > > > Option "dpms" "on" > > > # BusID "PCI:00:03:02" > > > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > > > EndSection > > > > > > Still the same result and log, here the last lines: > > > > > > (II) LoadModule: "glide" > > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glide_drv.o > > > (II) Module glide: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > > > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > > > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > > > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 > > > (II) Loading sub module "glide2x" > > > (II) LoadModule: "glide2x" > > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so > > > (II) LoadModule: "mouse" > > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/mouse_drv.o > > > (II) Module mouse: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > > > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > > > Module class: XFree86 XInput Driver > > > ABI class: XFree86 XInput driver, version 0.3 > > > (II) GLIDE: driver for Glide devices (Voodoo cards): Voodoo > > > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > > > (EE) No devices detected. > > > > > > Fatal server error: > > > no screens found > > > > > > > > > It_s interesting that I wrote in the XF86Config-4 in the device section: > > > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > > > but in the logfile, X recognizes: > > > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > > > Is this right? > > > PCI 00:05:0 is the Diamond Stealth 3d 2000 card, not the expansion card. > > > > > > If needed, I'll send the whole logs and XF86Config again. > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XF86 4.2.1 and Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 with Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card
ignore the -n, ;) * Jsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Try changing your BusID, I had that problem once. To confirm just do a > "lspci -n" > > Good Luck. > > * Lucia Cosima Eiselstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:18:12PM +0100, Lucia Cosima Eiselstein wrote: > > > > I just tried to set up XFree86 4.2.1-3 with a Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 > > > > card and a Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card. > > > > At the moment I'm struggling with the problems described in the logfile, > > > > attached to this e-mail. X doesn't want to start up, only gives the > > > > error messages > > > > > > > > "(EE) No devices detected. > > > > > > > > Fatal server error: > > > > no screens found" > > > > > > > > Hope that someone can help me and my somehow old hardware. > > > > > > Do you have the libglide2 package installed? > > > > > > > Yes, I have. Do I have to do something else after installing the > > deb-package? Following "man glide", I figured out that > > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so is a link to /usr/lib/libglide.so.2, > > not > > to /usr/lib/libglide2x.so how it should be. Changed that, changed the device > > section to: > > > > Section "Device" > > Identifier "Diamond MonsterII" > > Driver "glide" > > Option "dpms" "on" > > # BusID "PCI:00:03:02" > > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > > EndSection > > > > Still the same result and log, here the last lines: > > > > (II) LoadModule: "glide" > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glide_drv.o > > (II) Module glide: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 > > (II) Loading sub module "glide2x" > > (II) LoadModule: "glide2x" > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so > > (II) LoadModule: "mouse" > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/mouse_drv.o > > (II) Module mouse: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > > Module class: XFree86 XInput Driver > > ABI class: XFree86 XInput driver, version 0.3 > > (II) GLIDE: driver for Glide devices (Voodoo cards): Voodoo > > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > > (EE) No devices detected. > > > > Fatal server error: > > no screens found > > > > > > It_s interesting that I wrote in the XF86Config-4 in the device section: > > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > > but in the logfile, X recognizes: > > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > > Is this right? > > PCI 00:05:0 is the Diamond Stealth 3d 2000 card, not the expansion card. > > > > If needed, I'll send the whole logs and XF86Config again. > > > > Best regards > > > > Lucia Cosima Eiselstein > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Regards, > Jsen > > --- > .--. > | Jsen | > | http://arsha.ne1.net | > | http://www.m0sh.net | > | Wanting To Die Is Your Reason To Live| > "--' > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Jsen --- .--. | Jsen | | http://arsha.ne1.net | | http://www.m0sh.net | | Wanting To Die Is Your Reason To Live| "--'
Re: XF86 4.2.1 and Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 with Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card
Try changing your BusID, I had that problem once. To confirm just do a "lspci -n" Good Luck. * Lucia Cosima Eiselstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:18:12PM +0100, Lucia Cosima Eiselstein wrote: > > > I just tried to set up XFree86 4.2.1-3 with a Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 > > > card and a Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card. > > > At the moment I'm struggling with the problems described in the logfile, > > > attached to this e-mail. X doesn't want to start up, only gives the > > > error messages > > > > > > "(EE) No devices detected. > > > > > > Fatal server error: > > > no screens found" > > > > > > Hope that someone can help me and my somehow old hardware. > > > > Do you have the libglide2 package installed? > > > > Yes, I have. Do I have to do something else after installing the > deb-package? Following "man glide", I figured out that > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so is a link to /usr/lib/libglide.so.2, not > to /usr/lib/libglide2x.so how it should be. Changed that, changed the device > section to: > > Section "Device" > Identifier "Diamond MonsterII" > Driver "glide" > Option "dpms" "on" > # BusID "PCI:00:03:02" > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > EndSection > > Still the same result and log, here the last lines: > > (II) LoadModule: "glide" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glide_drv.o > (II) Module glide: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 > (II) Loading sub module "glide2x" > (II) LoadModule: "glide2x" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so > (II) LoadModule: "mouse" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/mouse_drv.o > (II) Module mouse: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 XInput Driver > ABI class: XFree86 XInput driver, version 0.3 > (II) GLIDE: driver for Glide devices (Voodoo cards): Voodoo > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > (EE) No devices detected. > > Fatal server error: > no screens found > > > It_s interesting that I wrote in the XF86Config-4 in the device section: > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > but in the logfile, X recognizes: > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > Is this right? > PCI 00:05:0 is the Diamond Stealth 3d 2000 card, not the expansion card. > > If needed, I'll send the whole logs and XF86Config again. > > Best regards > > Lucia Cosima Eiselstein > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Jsen --- .--. | Jsen | | http://arsha.ne1.net | | http://www.m0sh.net | | Wanting To Die Is Your Reason To Live| "--'
Re: XF86 4.2.1 and Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 with Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card
Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:18:12PM +0100, Lucia Cosima Eiselstein wrote: > > I just tried to set up XFree86 4.2.1-3 with a Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 > > card and a Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card. > > At the moment I'm struggling with the problems described in the logfile, > > attached to this e-mail. X doesn't want to start up, only gives the > > error messages > > > > "(EE) No devices detected. > > > > Fatal server error: > > no screens found" > > > > Hope that someone can help me and my somehow old hardware. > > Do you have the libglide2 package installed? > Yes, I have. Do I have to do something else after installing the deb-package? Following "man glide", I figured out that /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so is a link to /usr/lib/libglide.so.2, not to /usr/lib/libglide2x.so how it should be. Changed that, changed the device section to: Section "Device" Identifier "Diamond MonsterII" Driver "glide" Option "dpms" "on" # BusID "PCI:00:03:02" BusID "PCI:0:3:0" EndSection Still the same result and log, here the last lines: (II) LoadModule: "glide" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glide_drv.o (II) Module glide: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 (II) Loading sub module "glide2x" (II) LoadModule: "glide2x" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so (II) LoadModule: "mouse" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/mouse_drv.o (II) Module mouse: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 XInput Driver ABI class: XFree86 XInput driver, version 0.3 (II) GLIDE: driver for Glide devices (Voodoo cards): Voodoo (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 (EE) No devices detected. Fatal server error: no screens found It_s interesting that I wrote in the XF86Config-4 in the device section: BusID "PCI:0:3:0" but in the logfile, X recognizes: (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 Is this right? PCI 00:05:0 is the Diamond Stealth 3d 2000 card, not the expansion card. If needed, I'll send the whole logs and XF86Config again. Best regards Lucia Cosima Eiselstein
Re: XF86 4.2.1 and Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 with Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card
ignore the -n, ;) * Jsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Try changing your BusID, I had that problem once. To confirm just do a > "lspci -n" > > Good Luck. > > * Lucia Cosima Eiselstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:18:12PM +0100, Lucia Cosima Eiselstein wrote: > > > > I just tried to set up XFree86 4.2.1-3 with a Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 > > > > card and a Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card. > > > > At the moment I'm struggling with the problems described in the logfile, > > > > attached to this e-mail. X doesn't want to start up, only gives the > > > > error messages > > > > > > > > "(EE) No devices detected. > > > > > > > > Fatal server error: > > > > no screens found" > > > > > > > > Hope that someone can help me and my somehow old hardware. > > > > > > Do you have the libglide2 package installed? > > > > > > > Yes, I have. Do I have to do something else after installing the > > deb-package? Following "man glide", I figured out that > > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so is a link to /usr/lib/libglide.so.2, not > > to /usr/lib/libglide2x.so how it should be. Changed that, changed the device > > section to: > > > > Section "Device" > > Identifier "Diamond MonsterII" > > Driver "glide" > > Option "dpms" "on" > > # BusID "PCI:00:03:02" > > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > > EndSection > > > > Still the same result and log, here the last lines: > > > > (II) LoadModule: "glide" > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glide_drv.o > > (II) Module glide: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 > > (II) Loading sub module "glide2x" > > (II) LoadModule: "glide2x" > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so > > (II) LoadModule: "mouse" > > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/mouse_drv.o > > (II) Module mouse: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > > Module class: XFree86 XInput Driver > > ABI class: XFree86 XInput driver, version 0.3 > > (II) GLIDE: driver for Glide devices (Voodoo cards): Voodoo > > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > > (EE) No devices detected. > > > > Fatal server error: > > no screens found > > > > > > It_s interesting that I wrote in the XF86Config-4 in the device section: > > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > > but in the logfile, X recognizes: > > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > > Is this right? > > PCI 00:05:0 is the Diamond Stealth 3d 2000 card, not the expansion card. > > > > If needed, I'll send the whole logs and XF86Config again. > > > > Best regards > > > > Lucia Cosima Eiselstein > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Regards, > Jsen > > --- > .--. > | Jsen | > | http://arsha.ne1.net | > | http://www.m0sh.net | > | Wanting To Die Is Your Reason To Live| > "--' > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Jsen --- .--. | Jsen | | http://arsha.ne1.net | | http://www.m0sh.net | | Wanting To Die Is Your Reason To Live| "--' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XF86 4.2.1 and Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 with Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card
Try changing your BusID, I had that problem once. To confirm just do a "lspci -n" Good Luck. * Lucia Cosima Eiselstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:18:12PM +0100, Lucia Cosima Eiselstein wrote: > > > I just tried to set up XFree86 4.2.1-3 with a Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 > > > card and a Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card. > > > At the moment I'm struggling with the problems described in the logfile, > > > attached to this e-mail. X doesn't want to start up, only gives the > > > error messages > > > > > > "(EE) No devices detected. > > > > > > Fatal server error: > > > no screens found" > > > > > > Hope that someone can help me and my somehow old hardware. > > > > Do you have the libglide2 package installed? > > > > Yes, I have. Do I have to do something else after installing the > deb-package? Following "man glide", I figured out that > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so is a link to /usr/lib/libglide.so.2, not > to /usr/lib/libglide2x.so how it should be. Changed that, changed the device > section to: > > Section "Device" > Identifier "Diamond MonsterII" > Driver "glide" > Option "dpms" "on" > # BusID "PCI:00:03:02" > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > EndSection > > Still the same result and log, here the last lines: > > (II) LoadModule: "glide" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glide_drv.o > (II) Module glide: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Video Driver > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 > (II) Loading sub module "glide2x" > (II) LoadModule: "glide2x" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so > (II) LoadModule: "mouse" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/mouse_drv.o > (II) Module mouse: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 XInput Driver > ABI class: XFree86 XInput driver, version 0.3 > (II) GLIDE: driver for Glide devices (Voodoo cards): Voodoo > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > (EE) No devices detected. > > Fatal server error: > no screens found > > > It_s interesting that I wrote in the XF86Config-4 in the device section: > BusID "PCI:0:3:0" > but in the logfile, X recognizes: > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 > Is this right? > PCI 00:05:0 is the Diamond Stealth 3d 2000 card, not the expansion card. > > If needed, I'll send the whole logs and XF86Config again. > > Best regards > > Lucia Cosima Eiselstein > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Jsen --- .--. | Jsen | | http://arsha.ne1.net | | http://www.m0sh.net | | Wanting To Die Is Your Reason To Live| "--' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XF86 4.2.1 and Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 with Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card
Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:18:12PM +0100, Lucia Cosima Eiselstein wrote: > > I just tried to set up XFree86 4.2.1-3 with a Diamond Stealth 3D 2000 > > card and a Diamond Monster II 3D expansion card. > > At the moment I'm struggling with the problems described in the logfile, > > attached to this e-mail. X doesn't want to start up, only gives the > > error messages > > > > "(EE) No devices detected. > > > > Fatal server error: > > no screens found" > > > > Hope that someone can help me and my somehow old hardware. > > Do you have the libglide2 package installed? > Yes, I have. Do I have to do something else after installing the deb-package? Following "man glide", I figured out that /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so is a link to /usr/lib/libglide.so.2, not to /usr/lib/libglide2x.so how it should be. Changed that, changed the device section to: Section "Device" Identifier "Diamond MonsterII" Driver "glide" Option "dpms" "on" # BusID "PCI:00:03:02" BusID "PCI:0:3:0" EndSection Still the same result and log, here the last lines: (II) LoadModule: "glide" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/glide_drv.o (II) Module glide: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5 (II) Loading sub module "glide2x" (II) LoadModule: "glide2x" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libglide2x.so (II) LoadModule: "mouse" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/mouse_drv.o (II) Module mouse: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 XInput Driver ABI class: XFree86 XInput driver, version 0.3 (II) GLIDE: driver for Glide devices (Voodoo cards): Voodoo (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 (EE) No devices detected. Fatal server error: no screens found It_s interesting that I wrote in the XF86Config-4 in the device section: BusID "PCI:0:3:0" but in the logfile, X recognizes: (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:05:0 Is this right? PCI 00:05:0 is the Diamond Stealth 3d 2000 card, not the expansion card. If needed, I'll send the whole logs and XF86Config again. Best regards Lucia Cosima Eiselstein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]